Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 8
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2022
Print publication year:
2022
Online ISBN:
9781009105828

Book description

What do frontline social service providers do during client interactions when they lack adequate formal organizational resources to respond to clients' needs? To answer this question, this Element presents two large-scale qualitative studies of Israeli frontline providers of social services. Drawing on interviews of public-sector workers (Study 1, N=214), it introduces a widespread phenomenon, where the vast majority of frontline workers regularly provide a large range of informal personal resources (IFRs) to clients. Study 2 (N=84) then compares IFR provision between workers from the public, nonprofit and private sectors. The comparative analysis demonstrates how workers' rationale for providing personal resources to clients is shaped by particular role perceptions embedded in values, norms and behavioral expectations that vary by employment sector. The Element concludes by presenting ramifications of the phenomenon of IFR provision in terms of citizens' wellbeing, social inequality, gender relations and the future of work in public administration.

References

Andersen, L. B. (2009). What determines the behaviour and performance of health professionals? Public service motivation, professional norms and/or economic incentives. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 7997. http://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099507.
Baarspul, H. C., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2011). Do employees behave differently in public- vs private-sector organizations? Public Management Review, 13(7), 9671002. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589614.
Baines, D., & Armstrong, P. (2019). Non-job work/unpaid caring: Gendered industrial relations in long-term care. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 934947. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12293.
Baines, D., Cunningham, I., & Shields, J. (2017). Filling the gaps: Unpaid (and precarious) work in the nonprofit social services. Critical Social Policy, 37(4), 625645. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317693128.
Becker, H. S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research. In R. Jessor, A. Colby & R. Sweder (eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry, 27 (53–71). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Benjamin, O. (2016). Gendering Israel’s outsourcing: The erasure of employees’ caring skills. New York: Springer.
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 10781095. http://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585791.
Bøgh Andersen, L., & Serritzlew, S. (2012). Does public service motivation affect the behavior of professionals? International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 1929. http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.635277.
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599670. http://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1847.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740748. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.740.
Boyte, H. C. (2005). Reframing democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 536546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x.
Bröckling, U. (2015). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. London: SAGE.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2006). Bureaucracy redux: Management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 117. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj019.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 2), i253i277. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093.
Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238.
Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2015). Public value and public administration. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1998). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: SAGE.
Christensen, R. K., Moon, K.-K., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Genetics and sector of employment. International Public Management Journal, 24(5), 585595. http://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1802631.
Christensen, R. K., Paarlberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12796.
Cohen, N. (2016). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175187. http://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016665919.
Cohen, N. (2021). Policy entrepreneurship at the street level: Understanding the effect of the individual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, N., Benish, A., & Shamriz-Ilouz, A. (2016). When the clients can choose: Dilemmas of street-level workers in choice-based social services. Social Service Review, 90(4), 620646. http://doi.org/10.1086/689621.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, not steering. New York: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: : SAGE.
Destler, K. N. (2016). A matter of trust: Street level bureaucrats, organizational climate and performance management reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 517534. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw055.
Dörrenbächer, N. (2017). Europe at the frontline: Analysing street-level motivations for the use of European Union migration law. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 13281347. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314535.
Dubois, V. (2016). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. New York: Routledge.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81100.
Eldor, L. (2017). Public service sector: The compassionate workplace – The effect of compassion and stress on employee engagement, burnout, and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 86103. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux028.
England, P. (2005). Gender inequality in labor markets: The role of motherhood and segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(2), 264288. http://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi014.
Evans, T. (2012). Organisational rules and discretion in adult social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 43(4), 739758. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs008.
Evans, T. (2016). Professional discretion in welfare services: Beyond street-level bureaucracy. London: Routledge.
Evans, T., & Hupe, P. (2020). Discretion and the quest for controlled freedom. New York: Springer.
Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01953.x.
Glinsner, B., Sauer, B., Gaitsch, M., Penz, O., & Hofbauer, J. (2019). Doing gender in public services: Affective labour of employment agents. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 983999. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12263.
Gofen, A. (2013). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473493. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037.
Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00373.x.
Hacker, J. S. (2019). The great risk shift: The new economic insecurity and the decline of the American dream: Oxford University Press.
Harrits, G. S. (2019). Stereotypes in context: How and when do street-level bureaucrats use class stereotypes? Public Administration Review, 79(1), 93103. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12952.
Hartmann, J., & Khademian, A. M. (2010). Culture change refined and revitalized: The road show and guides for pragmatic action. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 845856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02216.x.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
He, P., Zhou, Q., Zhao, H., Jiang, C., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Compulsory citizenship behavior and employee creativity: Creative self-efficacy as a mediator and negative affect as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1640–1640. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01640.
Hsieh, C.-W. (2014). Burnout among public service workers: The role of emotional labor requirements and job resources. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(4), 379402. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x12460554.
Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548569. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401.
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureacracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x.
Hupe, P., & Krogt, T. v. d. (2013). Professionals dealing with pressures. In Mirko, N. & Bram, S. (eds.), Professionals under pressure: The reconfiguration of professional work in changing public services (pp. 5572). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Jilke, S., & Tummers, L. (2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 226238. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002.
Koopman, J., Lanaj, K., & Scott, B. A. (2015). Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 414435. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0262.
Kosar, K. R., & Schachter, H. L. (2011). Street level-bureaucracy: The dilemmas endure. [Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services, Michael Lipsky]. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 299302. www.jstor.org/stable/41061191.
Krøtel, S. M. L., & Villadsen, A. R. (2016). Employee turnover in hybrid organizations: The role of public sector socialization and organizational privateness. Public Administration, 94(1), 167184. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12211.
Lam, C. F., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). When do employees speak up for their customers? A model of voice in a customer service context. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 637666. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12050.
Lavee, E. (2021). Who is in charge? The provision of informal personal resources at the street level. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 420.
Lavee, E., & Cohen, N. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475492. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12387.
Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2), 333348. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12402.
Lavee, E., & Itzchakov, G. (2021). Good listening: A key element in establishing quality in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 0(0), 14687941211039402. http://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211039402
Lavee, E., & Offer, S. (2012). “If you sit and cry no one will help you”: Understanding perceptions of worthiness and social support relations among low-income women under a neoliberal discourse. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(3), 374393. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01240.x.
Lavee, E., & Pindek, S. (2020). The costs of customer service citizenship behaviors: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(460). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00460.
Lavee, E., & Strier, R. (2018). Social workers’ emotional labour with families in poverty: Neoliberal fatigue? Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 504512. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12443.
Lavee, E., & Strier, R. (2019). Transferring emotional capital as coerced discretion: Street-level bureaucrats reconciling structural deficiencies. Public Administration, 97(4), 910925. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12598.
Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(4), 423446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00129-3.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief, vol. 2. Oxford: Rowman Altamira.
Lipsky, M. (2010 [1980]). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lyons, B. J., & Scott, B. A. (2012). Integrating social exchange and affective explanations for the receipt of help and harm: A social network approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 6679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.002.
Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2011). Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), 680688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.003.
Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2011). The Israeli central bank: Political economy, global logics and local actors. New York: Routledge.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329358. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Maynard‐Moody, S., & Portillo, S. (2010). Street‐level bureaucracy theory. In R. F. Durant (ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Munyon, T. P., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2009). Optimism and the nonlinear citizenship behavior: Job satisfaction relationship in three studies. Journal of Management, 36(6), 15051528. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350085.
Ng, E. S. W., Gossett, C. W., & Winter, R. (2016). Millennials and public service renewal: Introduction on millennials and public service motivation (PSM). Public Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 412428. www.jstor.org/stable/24772877.
Nielsen, T. M., Hrivnak, G. A., & Shaw, M. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance: A meta-analysis of group-level research. Small Group Research, 40(5), 555577. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409339630.
Nieuwenhuis, R., & Maldonado, L. (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment and policies to improve well-being. Bristol: Policy Press.
Nordhall, O., Knez, I., Saboonchi, F., & Willander, J. (2020). Teachers’ personal and collective work-identity predicts exhaustion and work motivation: Mediating roles of psychological job demands and resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1538). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01538.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 9721001. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367373.
Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms – Public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy, 32(1), 1731. http://doi.org/10.1556/socec.32.2010.1.3.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potipiroon, W., Srisuthisa-ard, A., & Faerman, S. (2019). Public service motivation and customer service behaviour: Testing the mediating role of emotional labour and the moderating role of gender. Public Management Review, 21(5), 650668. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1500629.
Riccucci, N. M. (2017). Antecedents of public service motivation: The role of gender. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(2), 115126. http://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx010.
Roulston, K. (2010). Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 199228. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356739.
Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform. American sociological review, 74(3), 398422. http://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400304.
Skelcher, C., & Ferlie, E. (2005). Public-private partnerships and hybridity. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr. & C. Pollitt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 347370). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. (2015). Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433448. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12105.
Small, M. L. (2006). Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor. Social Problems, 53(2), 274292. http://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.274.
Small, M. L. (2009a). “How many cases do I need?”: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 538. http://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586.
Small, M. L. (2009b). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Small, M. L., & Gose, L. (2020). How do low-income people form survival networks? Routine organizations as brokers. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 689(1), 89109. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220915431.
Smith, S. R. (2010). Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: The governance challenge. Policy and Society, 29(3), 219229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.003.
Soss, J., Fording, R., & Schram, S. F. (2011). The organization of discipline: From Performance management to perversity and punishment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 2), i203i232. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq095.
Statistics, I. C. B. o. (2019). Statistical abstract of Israel.
Statistics, U. S. B. o. L. (2021). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. www.bls.gov/cps/tables.htm.
Steijn, B., & van der Voet, J. (2019). Relational job characteristics and job satisfaction of public sector employees: When prosocial motivation and red tape collide. Public Administration, 97(1), 6480. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12352.
Thomann, E. (2015). Is output performance all about the resources? A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of street-level bureaucrats In Switzerland. Public Administration, 93(1), 177194. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12130.
Thomann, E., Hupe, P., & Sager, F. (2018). Serving many masters: Public accountability in private policy implementation. Governance, 31(2), 299319. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12297.
Thomann, E., van Engen, N., & Tummers, L. (2018). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583601. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024.
Tracy, S. J., & Hinrichs, M. M. (2017). Big tent criteria for qualitative quality. In J. Matthes, C. Davis & R. Potter (eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 110). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527547. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978.
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 10991126. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056.
Tummers, L., Steijn, B., & Bekkers, V. (2012). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies: Content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration, 90(3), 716736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02016.x.
van Oorschot, W. (2010). Public perceptions of the economic, moral, social and migration consequences of the welfare state: An empirical analysis of welfare state legitimacy. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 1931. http://doi.org/10.1177/0958928709352538.
Vigoda‐Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 7793.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of business and psychology, 21(3), 377405. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9034-5.
Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_2), i233i251. http://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096.
Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 125139. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.125.
Yang, S.-B., & Guy, M. E. (2014). Gender effects on emotional labor in Seoul Metropolitan Area. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 324. http://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014550491.
Yildiz, B., & Elibol, E. (2021). Turnover intention linking compulsory citizenship behaviours to social loafing in nurses: A mediation analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(4), 653663. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13200.
Zacka, B. (2018). When the state meets the street. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.