Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 February 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science , pp. 331 - 349Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alesse, F. (2009). “Neurospastia: la problematica di anima e corpo in Marco Aurelio,” in Lapini, W, Malusa, L, and Mauro, L (Eds.), Gli Antichi e Noi. Studi in Onore di Antonio Mario Battegazzore. Genoa: Brigatti, 255–267.Google Scholar
Althoff, J. (1992a). “Das Konzept der generativen Wärme bei Aristoteles,” Hermes 120: 183–193.Google Scholar
Althoff, J. (1992b). Warm und kalt, flüssig und fest bei Aristoteles. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Angier, T. (2010). Technē in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. (1962) “Development of Biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: Theory of Spontaneous Generation,” Phronesis 7: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. M.(1987a). “Aristotle’s Biology Was Not Essentialist,” in Gotthelf, A and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 291–312. First published 1980 in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. M.(1987b). “Teleology and Necessity,” in Gotthelf, A and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–286.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M.(1992). Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I, with Passages from II. 1–3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (Ed.) (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995). The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 Vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2012). “History and Dialectics,” in Steel, C (Ed.), Aristotle, Metaphysics A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–104.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (2014). “The Concept of Mimēsis in the Hippocratic De Victu,” Classical Quarterly 64: 542–557.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (2015). Philosophy and Dietetics in the Hippocratic On Regimen: A Delicate Balance of Health. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (forthcoming a). “Aristotle and Hippocratic Writings,” in Connell, S (Ed.), Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (forthcoming b). “Aristotle and His Medical Precursors on Digestion and Nutrition,” in Lo Presti, R and Korobili, G (Eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bäumker, C. (1877). Des Aristoteles Lehre von den äussern und innern Sinnesvermögen. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Beere, J. (2009). Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. (2002). “Aristotle on Pneuma and Animal Self–Motion,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2006). “Eschatology and cosmology: models and problems,” in Sassi, M. M. (Ed.), The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 27–50.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2007). “On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology,” Phronesis 52: 3–32.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2012). “The Next Principle. Aristotle, Metaphysics A3–4,” in Steel, C (Ed.), Aristotle, Metaphysics A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 105–140.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2014). “Pythagoreans, Orphism and Greek Religion,” in Huffman, C. A. (Ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–166.Google Scholar
Betegh, G., Pedriali, F., and Pfeiffer, C. (2013). “The Perfection of Bodies: Aristotle’s De Caelo I.1,” Rhizomata 1, 30–62.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1936). L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. (2002). “Pneuma and Ether in Aristotle’s Philosophy of Living Nature,” The Modern Schoolman 79, 255–276.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P.(2003). The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Living Nature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P.(2007). “The ‘Vehicle of the Soul’ and the Debate over the Origin of this Concept,” Philologus 151: 31–50.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P.(2010). “The Soul’s Instrument for Touching in Aristotle, On the Soul II 11, 422b34–3a21,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92: 89–102.Google Scholar
Bos, A. P. and Ferwerda, R. (2008). Aristotle, On the Life–Bearing Spirit (De Spiritu): A Discussion with Plato and His Predecessors on Pneuma as the Instrumental Body of the Soul. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Boudouris, K. J. (Ed.) (1998). Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 2 (Studies in Greek Philosophy 29). Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Wildberg, C. (Eds.) (2009). New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowin, J. (2011). “Aristotle on Various Types of Alteration in De Anima II 5,” Phronesis 56: 138–161.Google Scholar
Bowin, J. (2012). “Aristotle on ‘First Transitions’ in De Anima II 5,” Apeiron 45: 262–282.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. (1953). “The Proem of Parmenides,” in Problems in Greek Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 38–53.Google Scholar
Boylan, M. (1982). “The Digestive and ‘Circulatory’ Systems in Aristotle’s Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology 15: 89–118.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. (2014). Initiations into the Mysteries of the Ancient World. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. (1990). “Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology,” in Devereux, D and Pellegrin, P (Eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote. Paris: Éditions du CNRS, 389–403.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. (2012). Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1969). “Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras,” Phronesis 14: 1–30.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Translated by E. L. Minar Jr. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1983). Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by P. Bing. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2004). Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis: Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2001a). “Aquinas on ‘Spiritual Change’ in Perception,” in Perler, D (Ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. (Ed.) (1954). Spirit and Nature: Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Carbone, A. (2002). Aristotele: L’anima e il corpo i: Parva Naturalia. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Carnot, N. L. S. (1824). Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres à développer cette puissance. Paris: Bachelier (English Translation (1890). Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat and on Machines Fitted to Develop That Power. Translated by Robert Henry Thurston. New York: J. Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
Casertano, G. (2011). “Parmenides: Scholar of Nature,” in Cordero, N. L. (Ed.), Parmenides Venerable and Awesome. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 21–58.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (1998). “Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–98.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2005). “The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception,” in Salles, R (Ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 245–320.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (2012). Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Soul. Part I: Soul as Form of the Body, Parts of the Soul, Nourishment, and Perception. Translation, Introduction, and Notes. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (2009). “Aristotle on Desire and Action,” in Frede, D and Reis, B (Eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 291–308.Google Scholar
Code, A. (1987). “Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Philosophical Topics 15: 51–59.Google Scholar
Coles, A. (1995). “Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the 5th Century bc and Aristotle Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 40: 48–88.Google Scholar
Coles, A. (1997). “Animal and Childhood Cognition in Aristotle’s Biology and the scala naturae,” in Kullmann, W and Föllinger, S (Eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Stuttgart: Vittorio Klostermann, 287–323.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2008a). “Praktische Syllogismen bei Aristoteles,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90: 247–297.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2008b). “Two Jobs for Aristotle’s Practical Syllogism?” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11: 163–184.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2008c). Streben und Bewegen: Aristoteles’ Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewegung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2011). “Aristotle’s Definition of Non–Rational Pleasure and Pain and Desire,” in Miller, J (Ed.), Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–143.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (2014). “Activity, Passivity and Perceptual Discrimination in Aristotle,” in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M (Eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 31–53.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. (forthcoming). “Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Chapter 6,” in Primavesi, O and Rapp, C (Eds.), Aristotle: De Motu Animalium (Proceedings of the XIXth Symposium Aristotelicum). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, P. (2010). “Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregorić, P. (2013). “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion,” Phronesis 58(1): 52–97.Google Scholar
Coughlin, S., Leith, D., and Lewis, O. (Eds.) (forthcoming). The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle. Berlin: Edition Topoi.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. (2009). The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation. The Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Revised and Expanded Ed. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Craik, E. (2015). The ‘Hippocratic’ Corpus: Content and Context. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (Eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dean–Jones, L. (2012). “Clinical Gynecology and Aristotle’s Biology: The Composition of HA X,” Apeiron 45: 180–200.Google Scholar
Debru, A. (1996). Le corps respirant: la pensee physiologique chez Galien: Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1959). “Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts. Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts,” Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz 1958(11): 629–724.Google Scholar
Demont, P. (2005). “About Philosophy and Humoural Medicine,” in van der Eijk, P. J. (Ed.), Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity: Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 271–286.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1898). “Über die Gedichte des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 63: 396–415, reprinted in W. Burkert (Ed.) (1969). Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der Antiken Philosophie. Hildesheim: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt, 127–46.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 1. Band (6th Ed.). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1952). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 2. Band (6th Ed.). Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Hershbell, J. P. (Eds.) (1991). Iamblichus: on the Pythagorean Way of Life. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Dockrill, D. W. and Tanner, R. G. (Eds.) (1984). The Concept of Spirit: Papers from The Concept of Spirit Conference Held at St Paul’s College, University of Sydney, 21–24 May 1984, Prudentia Supplementary Number. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1968). “Il De Anima di Alessandro d’Afrodisia e Michele Efesio,” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 96: 316–323.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. (1965). Aristotelis De Generatione Animalium. Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Düring, I. (1944) (Reprinted 1980). Aristotle’s Chemical Treatise, Meteorologica Book IV. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. (1983). “Aristotle on What Is Done in Perceiving,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 37: 181–198.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. (2013). Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, P. (2014). “Reasoning and the Unity of Aristotle’s Account of Animal Motion,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47:151–203.Google Scholar
Fernandez, P. and Mittelmann, J. (2017). “ἡ κίνησις τῆς τέχνης: Crafts and Souls as Principles of Change,” Phronesis 62: 136–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, B. (1984). “Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 127: 1–22.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2013). “Praktische Wahrnehmung,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61: 403–418.Google Scholar
Frampton, M. (2008). Embodiments of Will: Anatomical and Physiological Theories of Voluntary Animal Motion from Greek Antiquity to the Latin Middle Ages, 400 bc–ad 1300. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar
Fredrich, C. (1899). Hippokratische Untersuchungen. Berlin: Weidmännische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. (1994). “Aristotle on Perception, Appetition and Self-Motion,” in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.), Self–Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 35–63.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G. (1995). Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G. (2009). “The Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos: Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes,” in Bowen, A and Wildberg, C (Eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De caelo. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 239–281.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, J. (1863). Über den Begriff des Wortes Phantasia bei Aristoteles. Göttingen: Verlag von Adalbert Rente.Google Scholar
Frey, C. (2015a). “Two Conceptions of Soul in Aristotle,” in Ebrey, D (Ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–160.Google Scholar
Frey, C(2015b). “From Blood to Flesh: Homonymy, Unity, and Ways of Being in Aristotle,” Ancient Philosophy 35: 375–394.Google Scholar
Frixione, E. (2013). “Pneuma–Fire Interactions in Hippocratic Physiology,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 68: 505–528.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1989). Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. (2010). “Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Embryology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. (1989). Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L.(1994). “Aristotle on Self–Motion,” in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.), Self–Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 15–34.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L.(1997). “Material Necessity and Meteorology IV 12,” in Kullmann, W and Föllinger, S (Eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 145–161.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L.(2014). “The Limits of Teleology in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV.12,” History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 335–350.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (Eds.) (1994). Self–Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1906). Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 1. Translated by L. Magnus. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1989). “Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion,” in Penner, T and Kraut, R (Eds.), Nature, Knowledge and Virtue: Essays in Memory of Joan Kung (Apeiron 23.4). Edmonton: Academic Printing and Publishing, 181–93.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (2012a). “Understanding Aristotle’s Teleology,” in Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–89.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (2012b). Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.–B. (2013). “‘Origine du mouvement’ (ὅθεν ἡ ἀρχὴ τῆς κινήσεως) et ‘cause efficiente’ (ποιητικὸν αἴτιον) chez Aristote,” in Viano, C, Natali, C, and Zingano, M (Eds.), Aitia I. Les quatre causes d’Aristote: origines et interprétations. Leuven: Peeters, 91–121.Google Scholar
Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. (2013). Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2006). Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.(2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. (2005). “Plato’s and Aristotle’s Explanation of Human Posture;” Rhizai II(2): 183–196.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. (forthcoming a). “Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Chapters 9 and 10,” in Primavesi, O and Rapp, C (Eds.), Aristotle: De Motu Animalium (Proceedings of the XIXth Symposium Aristotelicum). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. (forthcoming b). “Soul in Pseudo-Aristotle’s De spiritu,” in Coughlin, S, Leith, D, and Lewis, O (Eds.), The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle. Berlin: Edition Topoi.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. and Kuhar, M. (2014) “Aristotle’s Physiology of Animal Motion: On Neura and Muscles,” Apeiron 47: 94–115.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P. and Lewis, O. (2015). “Pseudo–Aristotelian De spiritu: A New Case against Authenticity,” Classical Philology 110(2): 159–167.Google Scholar
Gregorić, P., Lewis, O., and Kuhar, M. (2015). “The Substance of De spiritu,” Early Science and Medicine 20: 101–124.Google Scholar
Grmek, M. (1989). Diseases of the Ancient World. Translated by M. Muellner and L. Muellner. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gundert, B. (2000). “Soma and Psyche in Hippocratic Medicine,” in Wright, J. P. and Potter, P (Eds.), Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind–Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 13–36.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 1: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C.(1965). A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2: From Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. (1995). “Science,” in Barnes, J (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–167.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. (1998). Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hannon, J. (2011). “Aristotle’s Conception of Science: The Case of On Youth and Old Age, and Life and Death, and Respiration.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Henry, D. (2003). “Themistius and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 183–207.Google Scholar
Hett, W. S. (1957). Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath, 2nd Rev. Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2011). “To What Extent Is the Concept of Spirit (Geist) in German Idealism a Legitimate Heir to the Concept of Spirit (Pneuma) in the New Testament?” Philotheos 11: 162–174.Google Scholar
Hoven, R. (1971). Stoïcisme et Stoïciens face au problème de l’au–delà. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2009). “The Pythagorean Conception of the Soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus,” in Frede, D and Reis, B (Eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, 21–43.Google Scholar
Hull, D. (1967–8). “The Conflict between Spontaneous Generation and Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Inter-American Congress of Philosophy 7: 245–250.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2005). “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1913b). Aristotelis De animalium motione et De animalium incessu/Ps–Aristotelis De spiritu libellus, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1938). Diokles von Karystos: Die griechische Medizin und die Schule des Aristoteles. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2004). “Empedocles, On Nature I 233–364: A New Reconstruction of P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666,” Zeitschrift für Payrologie und Epigraphik 150: 1–26.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. (1997). Aristotle on the Sense-Organs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K.(2002). “Imprinted on the Mind: Passive and Active in Aristotle’s Theory of Perception,” in Saunders, B and van Brakel, J (Eds.), Theories, Technologies, Instrumentalities of Colour. Lanham: University Press of America, 169–188.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K.(2004). Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus–Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. (2006). “What’s New in the De Sensu? The Place of the De Sensu in Aristotle’s Psychology,” in King, R. A. H. (Ed.), Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K.(2007). “The Soul as an Inner Principle of Change: The Basis of Aristotle’s Psychological Naturalism,” in Scott, D (Ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 276–300.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K.(2009). “From Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s De Caelo: The Case of the Missing World Soul,” in Bowen, A and Wildberg, C (Eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 9–28.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K.(2012). The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. (2013a). “The Eschatology behind the Tablets,” in Graf, F and Johnston, S. I. (Eds.), Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London: Routledge, 94–136.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I.(2013b). “The Myth of Dionysus,” in Graf, F and Johnston, S. I. (Eds.), Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. London: Routledge, 66–93.Google Scholar
Joly, R. (1960). Recherches sur le traité pseudo-hippocratique Du régime, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Joly, R. (2003). Hippocrate tome 13. Des lieux dans l’homme; Du système des glandes; Des fistules; Des hémorroïdes; De la vision; Des chairs; De la dentition. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Joly, R. and Byl, S. (1984). “Hippocratis De diaeta,” in Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, I 2,4, 1. Ed., Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Joly, R. and Byl, S. (2003). “Hippocratis De diaeta,” in Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, I 2,4, 2. Ed., Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S. (1923). Hippocrates, Vol. 1. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S.(1931). Hippocrates, Vol. 4. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. H. S.(1968). The Medical Writings of Anonymous Londiniensis. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1998). “L’interpretation des rêves et la théorie micro-macrocosmique dans le traité Hippocratique Du Régime: semiotique et mimesis,” in Fischer, K. D., Nickel, D, and Potter, P (Eds.), Text and Translation. Leiden: Brill, 161–174.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1999). Hippocrates. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (2012). “The Theory of Sensation, Thought and the Soul in the Hippocratic Treatise Regimen: Its Connections with Empedocles and Plato’s Timaeus,” in Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers, Leiden, Boston: Brill, 195–228.Google Scholar
Journée, G. (2012). “Lumière et nuit, féminin et masculin chez Parménide d’Elée: quelques remarques,” Phronesis 57: 289–318.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1960). Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.(1966). “Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s psychology,” Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie 48: 43–81.Google Scholar
Karsten, S. (1835). Parmenidis Eleatae Carminis Reliquiae, Philosophorum Graecorum Veterum, i/1. Amsterdam: Muller.Google Scholar
Kauder, E. (1960). “Physikalische Modellvorstellung und physiologische Lehre im Corpus Hippocraticum und bei Aristoteles.” Unpublished dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H.(2008). “Changing Things: Aristotle on Action and the Capacity for Action in Metaphysics Θ 5,” in Crubellier, M, Jaulin, A, Lefebvre, D, and Morel, P.–M. (Eds.), Dunamis. Autour de la puissance chez Aristote. Leuven: Peeters, 327–351.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995). Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M. (Eds.) (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. (2013). The Activity of Being. An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (2013). “Parmenides,” in Flashar, H, Bremer, D, and Rechenauer, G (Eds.), Die Philosophie der Antike Band 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie. Basel: Schwabe, 441–530.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1968). “Pneumatische Ärzte,” in Paulys Realexcyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaften, Supplementband XI. Munich: Alfred Drückenmüller, 1097–1108.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2003). “Phénomènes et références: éléments pour une réflexion sur la rationalisation de l’irrationnel,” Methodos 3: 9–33.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2008a). “Speculating about Diogenes of Apollonia,” in Curd, P and Graham, D. W. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 353–364.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2008b). Diogène d’Apollonie: Édition, traduction et commentaire des fragments et témoignages (2nd Ed.). Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (2018). “Articulating the De motu animalium: The Place of the Treatise within the Corpus Aristotelicum,” Kosmos VII, 19–37.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Rashed, M. (Eds.) (2004). Aristote et le mouvement des animaux, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Langholf, V. (1990). “L’air (pneuma) et les maladies,” in Potter, P, Maloney, G, and Desautels, J (Eds.), La Maladie et les Maladies dans la Collection Hippocratique. Quebec: Éditions du Sphinx, 339–359.Google Scholar
Le Blay, F. (2005). “Microcosm and Macrocosm: The Dual Direction of Analogy in Hippocratic Thought and the Meteorological Tradition,” in van der Eijk, P. J. (Ed.), Hippocrates in Context: Papers Read at the XIth International Hippocrates Colloquium, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 27–31 August 2002. Leiden: Brill, 251–269.Google Scholar
Lee, H. D. P. (1952). Aristotle: Meteorologica. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H. D. P.(2008). Plato. Timaeus and Critias. Revised by T. Johansen. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (1996). “Aristotle’s Biological Development: The Balme Hypothesis,” in Wians, W (Ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 229–248.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G.(2001a). Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G.(2001b). Aristotle: On Parts of Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G.(2014). “Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology,” History of Philosophy of Science 4(2): 272–305.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. and Gregorić, P. (2015). “The Context of De Spiritu,” Early Science and Medicine 20: 125–149.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1964). “The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 84: 92–106.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(1966). Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(1978). “The Empirical Basis of Physiology in the Parva Naturalia,” in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (Eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215–240.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(1992). “Aspects of the Relationship between Aristotle’s Psychology and His Zoology,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–167.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(1996a). Aristotelian Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(1996b). “Spontaneous Generation and Metamorphosis,” in Aristotelian Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 104–125.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(2006). “Diogenes of Apollonia: Master of Ducts,” in Sassi, M. M. (Ed.), La Construzione del discorso filosopfico nell’età dei Presocratici. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 237–257.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.(2007). “Pneuma between Body and Soul,” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13. Wind, Life, Health: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives: 135–146.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (Eds.) (1978). Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lommer, F. (1938). “Hippokrates: Die Siebenzahl,” in Kapferer, R (Ed.) Die Werke des Hippokrates in neuer deutscher Übersetzung, Bd. 20, Stuttgart: Hippokrates-Verlag Marquardt, 83–125.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1966). “Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?” Classical Quarterly 16: 256–276.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. (1985). “A Seminal Debate in the Fifth Century bc?” in Gotthelf, A (Ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. London: Bristol Classical Press, 277–287.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. (1993). Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. (1995). “Medicine and the Lyceum,” in Van der Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (Eds.) Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-Cultural Context, Vol. 2. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, 431–445.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. (1981). The Hippocratic Treatises “On Generation,” “On the Nature of the Child,” “Diseases IV.” Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R. and Korobili, G. (Eds.) (forthcoming). Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R. and van der Eijk, P. J. (2017). “Werner Jaeger und die antike Medizin,” in King, C. G. and Lo Presti, R (Eds.), Werner Jaeger. Wissenschaft, Bildung, Politik (Philologus Supplemente, Band 9). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 209–244.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2007). “The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 179–220.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, P. (2007). “A Philosophical Commentary on Aristotle’s De spiritu.” Unpublished dissertation, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. (1999). “‘Aristotle’ and the Role of Doxography in the Anonymous Londiniensis (PBRLIBR INV. 137),” in van der Eijk, P. J (Ed.), Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 95–141.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1964). Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die Menschliche Welt. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1971). The Pseudo-Hippocratic Tract Peri Hebdomadon Chapters 1–11 and Greek Philosophy. Van Gorcum & Prakke: Assen.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992). Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2015). “Parmenides from Right to Left,” Études platoniciennes 12, doi:10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.699.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Primavesi, O. (Eds.) (2012). Die Vorsokratiker. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2014). Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A. and Primavesi, O. (1999). L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. 1665–1666), Introduction, édition et commentaire. Berlin/New York/Strasbourg: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2011). Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary, 2nd Ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2002). “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.Google Scholar
Mihai, A. (2010). “Soul’s Aitherial Abode according to the Poteidaia Epitaph and the Presocratic Philosophers,” Numen 57: 553–582.Google Scholar
Mittelmann, J. (2013). “Neoplatonic Sailors and Peripatetic Ships: Aristotle, Alexander and Philoponus,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54: 545–566.Google Scholar
Modell, S. M. (2010). “Aristotelian Influence in the Formation of Medical Theory,” The European Legacy 15: 409–424.Google Scholar
Modrak, D. (1987). Aristotle: The Power of Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2006). “Common to Soul and Body in the Parva Naturalia,” in King, R. A. H. (Ed.), Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morisson, B. (2004). “Self–Motion in Physics VIII,” in Laks, A and Rashed, M (Eds.), Aristote et le mouvement des animaux, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 67–79.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2012). Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought and Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1984). “Aristotle’s Rationalist Account of Qualitative Interaction,” Phronesis, 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.(2005). “Intrinsic and Relational Properties of Atoms in the Democritean Ontology,” in Salles, R (Ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.(2008). The Route of Parmenides. Revised and Expanded Ed. Las Vegas: Parmenides.Google Scholar
Neuhäuser, J. (1878). Aristoteles’ Lehre von dem sinnlichen Erkenntnisvermögen und seinen Organen. Leipzig: Koschny.Google Scholar
Neustadt, E. (1909). “Ps.-Aristoteles, Peri pneumatos c. IX und Athenaios von Attalia,” Hermes 44: 60–69.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (2004). Philosophical Writings. Edited by A. Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C.(1985). Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (Eds.) (1992). Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2006). “Life beyond the Stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles (De Caelo I.9 279 a11–22),” in King, R. A. H. (Ed.), Common to Body and Soul. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 49–102.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (1997). “The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus,” Ancient Philosophy 17(1): 119–134.Google Scholar
Oser–Grote, C. M. (2004). Aristoteles und das Corpus Hippocraticum: Die Anatomie und Physiologie des Menschen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2007). “Democritus and Secondary Qualities,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2): 99–121.Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. (1937). Aristotle: Parts of Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. (Ed.) (1942). Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peck, A. L. and Forster, E. S. (1961). Aristotle: Parts of Animals, Movement of Animals, Progression of Animals. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pellikaan–Engel, M. E. (1978). Hesiod and Parmenides: A New View on Yheir Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Perler, D. (Ed.) (2001). Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2004). “Les cinq sources dont parle Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques 117: 393–446.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C.(2006). “Aristote, Poétique 1457 b 13–14: la métaphore d’espèce à espèce,” Revue des études grecques 119: 532–551.Google Scholar
Platt, A. (1912). De Generatione Animalium, in The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, Vol. 5. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Platt, A. (1910). Aristotle: De Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popa, T. (2010). “Aristotle on Pure and Simple Stuff,” Rhizai: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science VII: 29–61.Google Scholar
Popa, T. (2014a). “Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Meteorology IV,” History of Philosophy of Science 4: 306–334.Google Scholar
Popa, T. (2014b). “Observing the Invisible Regimen I on Elemental Powers and Higher Order Dispositions,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy: 1–20.Google Scholar
Potter, P., Maloney, G., and Desautels, J (Eds.) (1990). La Maladie et les maladies dans la Collection Hippocratique. Quebec: Éditions du Sphinx.Google Scholar
Preus, A. (1975). Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Biological Works. Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008). “Physical and Mythical Divinity,” in Curd, P and Graham, D. W. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 250–283.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2011). “Empedokles,” in Mansfeld, J and Primavesi, O (Eds.), Die Vorsokratiker. Stuttgart: Reclam Bibliothek, 464–466.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. and Corcilius, K. (2018). Aristoteles: Über die Bewegung der Lebewesen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Ranzato, S. (2015). Il Kouros e la Verità: Polivalenza delle immagini nel poema di Parmenide. Pisa: ETS Editrice.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2018). “A Latent Difficulty in Aristotle’s Theory of Semen: The Homogeneous Nature of Semen and the Role of the Frothy Bubble,” in A. Falcon and D. Lefebvre (Eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 108–129.Google Scholar
Reiche, H. T. A. (1960). Empedocles’ Mixture, Eudoxan Astronomy and Aristotle’s Connate Pneuma. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. (1992). “Desire and the Good in De Anima,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 381–399.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1984). “On Greek Biology, Greek Cosmology and Some Sources of Theological Pneuma,” in Dockrill, D. W. and Tanner, R. G. (Eds.), The Concept of Spirit: Papers from The Concept of Spirit Conference Held at St. Paul’s College, University of Sydney, 21–24 May 1984. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland, 27–47.Google Scholar
Robbiano, C. (2006). Becoming Being: On Parmenides’ Transformative Philosophy. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. (1998). “Galen and Greek Pneuma Theory: The Limits of Physiological Explanation,” in Boudouris, K. J. (Ed.), Philosophy and Medicine, Vol. 2 (Studies in Greek Philosophy 29). Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy, 171–197.Google Scholar
Rohde, R. (1925). Psyche: The Cult of Souls and Belief in Immortality among the Greeks. Translated by W. B. Hillis. London: W. B. Hillis.Google Scholar
Roreitner, R. (2014). “Perception and Hylomorphism: Receptive Activity of Senses in Aristotle’s De anima II 5,” Eirene 50: 176–207.Google Scholar
Roscher, W. (1913). Die hippokratische Schrift von der Siebenzahl: in ihrer vierfachen Überlieferung. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Ross, G. R. T. (1906). Aristotle: De sensu and De memoria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saake, H. (1974). “Pneuma,” in Paulys Realexcyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaften, Supplementband XIV. Munich: Alfred Drückenmüller, 387–412.Google Scholar
Sakezles, P. K. (2011). “Aristotle and Chrysippus on the Physiology of Human Action,” Apeiron 31: 127–166.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (Ed.) (2005). Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauve Meyer, S. (1992). “Aristotle, Teleology, and Reduction,” Philosophical Review 101: 791–825.Google Scholar
Schluderer, L. R. (2018). “Imitating the Cosmos: The Role of Microcosm–Macrocosm Relationships in the Hippocratic Treatise On Regimen,” Classical Quarterly 68: 31–52.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1997). “The Ionians,” in Taylor, C. C. W. (Ed.), Routledge History of Philosophy Vol. I: From the Beginning to Plato. London: Routledge, 47–87.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1985). “Theophrastus on the Heavens,” in Wiesner, J (Ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, Paul Moraux gewidmet, Vol. I. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 577–593.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2016). Aristotle: De Anima, Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1957). “The Vital Heat, the Inborn Pneuma and the Aether,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 119–123.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1960). Aristotle’s System of the Physical World: A Comparison with His Predecessors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1961). “Greek Philosophy and the Discovery of the Nerves,” Museum Helveticum 18: 150–97. Reprinted in (1968–82) Kleine Schriften, 3 Vols., Vol. 1. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 536–582.Google Scholar
Stavrianeas, S. (2008). “Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle’s Biology,” Rhizai V: 303–338.Google Scholar
Steinfartz, S., Vicario, S., Arntzen, J. W., and Caccone, A. (2006). “A Bayesian Approach on Molecules and Behavior: Reconsidering Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Patterns of the Salamandridae with Emphasis on Triturus Newts,” Journal of Experimental Zoology–B (Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 306(2): 139–162.Google Scholar
Steckerl, F. (1958). The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and His School. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Stratton, G. M. (1917). Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle. Amsterdam: Bonset & Schippers.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1965). Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Fragments: A Text and Translation with a Commentary (Phoenix Pre–Socratics 5. Phoenix Supplementary Vol. 36). Toronto/London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Thivel, A. (2005). “Air, Pneuma, and Breathing from Homer to Hippocrates,” in van der Eijk, P. J. (Ed.), Hippocrates in Context, Leiden: Brill, 239–249.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2015). “Parmenides’ Epistemology and the Two Parts of His Poem,” Phronesis 60: 3–39.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2017). Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torgerson, T. B. (2006). “The εἰδὼς φώς and the Traditional Dichotomy of Divine and Mortal Epistemology,” Revue de philosophie ancienne 24: 25–43.Google Scholar
Tracy, T. (1969). Physiological Theory and the Doctrine of the Mean in Plato and Aristotle. Chicago: Loyola University Press.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2014). “From Wandering Limbs to Limbless God: δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles,” Apeiron 47(2): 172–210.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2017). “From Hades to the Stars: Empedocles on the Cosmic Habitats of Soul,” Classical Antiquity 36(1): 130–182.Google Scholar
Tricot, J. (1951). Parva Naturalia suivis du Traité pseudo-aristotélicien De spiritu. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. M. (2014) “Aristotle and the Discovery of Efficient Causation,” in Schmaltz, T (Ed.), Efficient Causation: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–47.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (1994). Aristotle: De insomniis, De divinatione per somnum. Berlin: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J.(1995). “Aristotle on ‘Distinguished Physicians’ and on the Medical Significance of Dreams,” in van der Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H., Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-Cultural Context, Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 447–460.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J.(2005). Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J.(2012) “Hippocrate aristotélicien,” Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres 4: 1501–1522.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (Ed.) (1999). Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (Eds.) (1995). Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-Cultural Context, Vol. 2. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Van Kooten, G. H. (2008). Paul’s Anthropology in Context: the Image of God, Assimilation to God, and Tripartite Man in Ancient Judaism, Ancient Philosophy, and Early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2001). Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle’s Topics I. Translation, Introduction, and Notes. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1945). L’évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du stoicisme à S. Augustin. Leuven/Paris: Desclée De Brouwer and Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1978). “Doctrine du pneuma et entelechisme chez Aristote,” in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (Eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–214.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1947). “Notes on the Presocratics,” Mnemosyne Series. 3, 13: 271–289.Google Scholar
Vermeir, K. (2004). “The ‘Physical Prophet’ and the Powers of the Imagination. Part I: A Case-Study on Prophecy, Vapours, and the Imagination (1685–1710),” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35: 561–591.Google Scholar
Viano, C. (2006). La matière des choses: le livre IV des Météorologiques d’Aristote et son interprétation par Olympiodore. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1946). “Parmenides’ Theory of Knowledge,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 77: 66–77.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1970). “Theology and Philosophy in Early Greek Thought,” in Furley, D and Allen, R. E. (Eds.), Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 1: The Beginnings of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 92–129.Google Scholar
Von Staden, Heinreich (1992). “Jaeger’s ‘Skandalon der historischen Vernunft’: Diocles, Aristotle and Theophrastus,” in Calder, W. M. (Ed.), Werner Jaeger Reconsidered. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 227–265.Google Scholar
Waterlow, S. (1982). Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1971). “The Cosmology of Hippocrates’ De Hebdomadibus,” Classical Quarterly 21: 365–388.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (1992). “Living Bodies,” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (Eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–91.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (2002). “Locomotive Soul: The Parts of Soul in Aristotle’s Scientific Works,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 141–200.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz–Moellendorff, Ulrich von (1959). Der Glaube der Hellenen3, 2 Vols. Basel: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wili, W. (1954). “The History of Spirit in Antiquity,” in Campbell, J (Ed.), Spirit and Nature: Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks. New York: Pantheon, 75–106.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2013). Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, C. (1985). “Form, Reproduction, and Inherited Characteristics in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Phronesis 30: 46–57.Google Scholar
Witt, C. (2015) “In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology,” in Leunissen, M (Ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–120.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1919). Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, I. Teil, I. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1919–20). Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 6th Ed. 3 Vols. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Zingano, M. (2008). “O Tratado do Impulso e da Faculdade Impulsiva de Alexandre de Afrodísia e sua versão em Miguel de Éfeso,” Journal of Ancient Philosophy 2: 1–22.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1971). Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar