Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:57:44.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Risk factors in bereavement outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Margaret S. Stroebe
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Wolfgang Stroebe
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Robert O. Hansson
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

It has been estimated that a third of all major bereavements result in problems where professional help may be required (Raphael, 1983). For example, conjugal bereavement, when there is intense loneliness, appears to increase health risk, often resulting in the death of the surviving spouse (M. Stroebe & Stroebe, this volume; Maddison & Viola, 1968; Parkes & Brown, 1972). Similarly, the death of a child is associated with high morbidity in surviving parents (Fish, 1986; Rando, 1983; Sanders, 1986). Other factors, such as sudden death, lack of perceived support, or reduced material resources, have also been implicated as associated with high health risk. This chapter focuses on high-risk factors for poor outcome of bereavement, separating them into four general categories: biographical/demographic factors, individual factors, type and mode of death, and circumstances following the loss. It pays particular attention to the interaction and overlapping of these factors, which can cause greatly increased health risk.

It must be noted from the outset that a variety of methodological concerns cloud the interpretation of available data on bereavement research. For example, generalizability must be questioned when samples are composed of women primarily. Too, because of the private nature of grief in our culture and the inaccessibility of subjects, only those individuals who “volunteer” to participate can be included. This bias in subject selection introduces the possibility that a significant section of the population might evidence differing forms of grief than the ones described in the current literature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Bereavement
Theory, Research, and Intervention
, pp. 255 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×