Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Informants
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction: Persisting Pasts in the Margins of Europe
- Part 1 The Making of Estonian History
- Part 2 The Meaning of Closure
- Part 3 Closure and a Significant Other
- Conclusion: Guardians Of Living History
- List of Informants
- Full Reference List
- Index
Conclusion: Guardians Of Living History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2020
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Informants
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction: Persisting Pasts in the Margins of Europe
- Part 1 The Making of Estonian History
- Part 2 The Meaning of Closure
- Part 3 Closure and a Significant Other
- Conclusion: Guardians Of Living History
- List of Informants
- Full Reference List
- Index
Summary
Abstract
The conclusion summarizes what a living national history is in the case of Estonia. Then it discusses the guardians of the past introduced in this book, their anxieties and dreams, and places them in wider Estonian society. All informants act in their own ways, individually and collectively, to preserve their living ties with the past. By bringing all chapters together, the conclusion shows what all social groups introduced in the book have in common: they avoid full closure through mediation and representation. They fear that this will cut the emotional connection with the past, and that the horrors of the past might repeat themselves. Putting down the battle axes does not feel right in relation to their (grand) parents.
Keywords: Guardians of the past, acts of preservation, closure, repetition of the past, collective memory
‘The past is like an anchor. It helps us to survive in a storm, but it can also impede quick progress’. (Estonian National Museum, Tartu)
In this book I have questioned what personal and national stories of the past mean to people in Estonia, a society on the periphery of Europe, characterized by a short period of nationhood, historical ruptures, and a quick and desired integration into the European family.
The vulnerability of storytelling
In November 2013, two years after my fieldwork period, I found myself standing behind a desk in a big room in Estonia's National Museum [Eesti Rahva Muuseum] in Tartu. I was facing a group of about forty to fifty people, most of them my informants, some of them my informants’ friends. I had invited them to ‘give them back’ my research findings. I wanted to give them the opportunity to comment on my abstract interpretations of their personal stories, and of course to thank them for their emotional support, intimate memories, endless trust, and rhubarb cakes.
The audience consisted of a cross-section of my informants. I had met them at various stages of my fieldwork and through different social networks. The memory activists and deportees were definitely overrepresented. They are based in Tartu, dedicated to the topic, with lots of spare time, and I could easily inform them about my presentation through their organizational structure.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Guardians of Living HistoryAn Ethnography of Post-Soviet Memory Making in Estonia, pp. 323 - 338Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2020