Book contents
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Cambridge Studies on Governing Knowledge Commons
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution
- 2 On the Social Evolution of Knowledge
- 3 Individual Sovereignty and Coproduction of Knowledge Governance
- 4 Common Sense Commons
- 5 Conventions as Shared Cognitive Infrastructures
- 6 Property Rights, Knowledge Commons, and Blockchain Governance
- 7 Knowledge Commons, Social Infrastructures, and Informal Markets
- 8 Entrepreneurship and Governance in the Scotch Whisky Knowledge Commons
- 9 Trolling in the Deep
- 10 Crowdfunding the Queer Museum
- 11 Understanding Different Qualities of the Knowledge Commons in Contemporary Cities
- References
9 - Trolling in the Deep
Managing Transgressive Content on Online Platforms as a Commons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2021
Book contents
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Cambridge Studies on Governing Knowledge Commons
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution
- 2 On the Social Evolution of Knowledge
- 3 Individual Sovereignty and Coproduction of Knowledge Governance
- 4 Common Sense Commons
- 5 Conventions as Shared Cognitive Infrastructures
- 6 Property Rights, Knowledge Commons, and Blockchain Governance
- 7 Knowledge Commons, Social Infrastructures, and Informal Markets
- 8 Entrepreneurship and Governance in the Scotch Whisky Knowledge Commons
- 9 Trolling in the Deep
- 10 Crowdfunding the Queer Museum
- 11 Understanding Different Qualities of the Knowledge Commons in Contemporary Cities
- References
Summary
In this chapter, we introduce the notion of “transgression space” to describe the structure of governance of websites on which the community is characterized by the strong presence of trolls. Trolls are defined as users who constantly challenge the rules of websites they browse through, namely by posting transgressive content. The transgression space corresponds in this perspective to the arena of interactions in such communities. We demonstrate through a case study on the ``BlaBla 18-25’’ forum of jeuxvideo.com that the governance of these transgression spaces can be analysed through the Governing Knowledge Commons framework, allowing us to generalize this notion for other case studies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons , pp. 217 - 237Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Bateman, Patrick J., Gray, Peter H., and Butler, Brian S.. 2011. “Research Note – The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities.” Information Systems Research 22: 841–854.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Michael S., Monroy-Hernández, Andrés, Harry, Drew, André, Paul, Panovich, Katrina, and Vargas, Gregory G.. 2011. “4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 50–57. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Jonathan. 2014. “Representations of ‘Trolls’ in Mass Media Communication: A Review of Media-Texts and Moral Panics Relating to ‘Internet Trolling.’” International Journal of Web Based Communities 10: 7–24.Google Scholar
Coles, Bryn Alexander, and West, Melanie. 2016. “Trolling the Trolls: Online Forum Users Constructions of the Nature and Properties of Trolling.” Computers in Human Behavior 60: 233–244.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. 2003 [1511]. The Praise of Folly, edited by Miller, Clarence H.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Wendy J. 2009. “Discipline and Nourish: On Constructing Commons.” Cornell Law Review 95: 733–756.Google Scholar
Hess, Charlotte. 2012. “The Unfolding of the Knowledge Commons.” St Antony’s International Review 8: 13–24.Google Scholar
Hess, Charlotte, and Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, Christopher. 2013. “Trolling in Online Discussions: From Provocation to Community-Building.” Brno Studies in English 39: 5–25.Google Scholar
Ip, John. 2011. “The Dark Knight’s War on Terrorism.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 9: 209–230.Google Scholar
Larson, Maja, and Chon, Margaret. 2017. “The Greatest Generational Impact: Open Neuroscience as an Emerging Knowledge Commons.” In Governing Medical Knowledge Commons, edited by Strandburg, Katherine, Frischmann, Brett M., and Madison, Michael J., 166–192. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, Michael J., Frischmann, Brett M., and Strandburg, Katherine J. 2009a. “Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment.” Cornell Law Review 95: 657–710.Google Scholar
Madison, Michael J., Frischmann, Brett M., and Strandburg, Katherine J. 2009b. “Reply: The Complexity of Commons.” Cornell Law Review 95: 839–850.Google Scholar
Manivannan, Vyshali. 2012. “Attaining the Ninth Square: Cybertextuality, Gamification, and Institutional Memory on 4chan.” Enculturation 15 : 1–21. www.enculturation.net/attaining-the-ninth-squareGoogle Scholar
Marignier, Noémie. 2017. “‘Gay ou pas gay?’ Panique énonciative sur le forum jeuxvideo.com.” Genre, sexualité & société, 17. https://journals.openedition.org/gss/3964#entriesGoogle Scholar
Melzer, Arthur M. 2014. Philosophy between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pissavy, Sébastien. 2013. Jeuxvideo.com – Une Odyssée Interactive. Houdan: Pix’n Love.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by