Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Toom, Victor
2010.
Producing Suspects. The Politics of the National DNA Database of England and Wales.
Science as Culture,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
387.
Brettell, T. A.
Butler, J. M.
and
Almirall, J. R.
2011.
Forensic Science.
Analytical Chemistry,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 12,
p.
4539.
Kruse, Corinna
2012.
Legal storytelling in pre-trial investigations: arguing for a wider perspective on forensic evidence.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
299.
Kruger, Erin
2012.
Visualizing Uncertainty: Anomalous Images in Science and Law.
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
19.
2012.
Law and the Technologies of the Twenty-First Century.
p.
72.
Heinemann, Torsten
Lemke, Thomas
and
Prainsack, Barbara
2012.
Risky profiles: societal dimensions of forensic uses of DNA profiling technologies.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
249.
Machado, Helena
and
Costa, Susana
2012.
Biolegalidade, imaginário forense e investigação criminal*.
Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais,
p.
61.
Amorim, Antonio
2012.
Opening the DNA black box: demythologizing forensic genetics.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
Toom, Victor
2012.
Forensic DNA databases in England and the Netherlands: governance, structure and performance compared.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Wilson-Kovacs, Dana
Wyatt, David
and
Hauskeller, Christine
2012.
“A Faustian bargain?” Public voices on forensic DNA technologies and the National DNA Database.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
285.
Sager, Morten
Bragesjö, Fredrik
and
Elzinga, Aant
2013.
Emerging Health Technology.
p.
101.
M’charek, Amade
Hagendijk, Rob
and
Vries, Wiebe de
2013.
Equal before the Law.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
542.
Kruse, Corinna
2013.
The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility.
Social Studies of Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 5,
p.
657.
Machado, Helena
and
Costa, Susana
2013.
Biolegality, the Forensic Imaginary and Criminal Investigation*.
RCCS Annual Review,
Skinner, David
2013.
‘The NDNAD Has No Ability in Itself to be Discriminatory’: Ethnicity and the Governance of the UK National DNA Database.
Sociology,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 5,
p.
976.
Fonseca, Claudia
2013.
Mediações, tipos e figurações: reflexões em torno do uso da tecnologia DNA para identificação criminal.
Anuário Antropológico,
Vol. v.38 n.1,
Issue. ,
p.
09.
Lawless, Christopher J
2013.
The low template DNA profiling controversy: Biolegality and boundary work among forensic scientists.
Social Studies of Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Flear, Mark L
2014.
Clinical Trials Abroad: The Marketable Ethics, Weak Protections and Vulnerable Subjects of EU Law.
Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies,
Vol. 16,
Issue. ,
p.
75.
Williams, Robin
and
Wienroth, Matthias
2014.
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
p.
1128.
Toom, Victor
2014.
Trumping Communitarianism: Crime Control and Forensic DNA Typing and Databasing in Singapore.
East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
273.