Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:02:57.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Unresolved issues in atmospheric solar absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

William D. Collins
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
J. T. Kiehl
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
V. Ramanathan
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The importance of accurate estimates of solar absorption

The absorption of solar radiation by Earth's atmosphere and surface is the fundamental forcing of the climate system (Chapter 1). The net solar energy absorbed by the Earth–atmosphere system can be accurately quantified with satellite measurements of top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) insolation and planetary albedo. These observations have determined that the net global annually-average solar radiation absorbed by the Earth is 239 W m−2 (Harrison et al., 1990; Collins et al., 1994) with an uncertainty of approximately 2 W m−2. This absorbed solar radiation can be written as the sum of the solar radiation absorbed in the atmosphere and by the planetary surface. Despite numerous investigations over the last 40 years, the partitioning of the absorption between the surface and atmosphere is still very uncertain (for reviews, see Stephens and Tsay, 1991 and Ramanathan and Vogelmann, 1997). The discrepancy between estimates from models and observational studies is known as anomalous or enhanced shortwave absorption. The enhanced absorption is usually associated with clouds, although some investigators find evidence for “anomalous” absorption in clear-sky regions (Li et al., 1995; Li and Moreau, 1996; Arking, 1996; Kato et al., 1997).

The issues of the existence and magnitude of enhanced solar absorption has been examined intensively since Ramanathan et al. (1995), Cess et al. (1995), and Pilewskie and Valero (1995) found evidence for the anomaly in the tropical Pacific. Cess et al. (1995) also found evidence for enhanced absorption at Barrow, Alaska; Boulder, Colorado; Cape Grim, Tasmania; and Wisconsin.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×