Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 1
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
October 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139519328

Book description

In recent years, the study of formal semantics and formal pragmatics has grown tremendously, showing that core aspects of language meaning can be explained by a few principles. These principles are grounded in the logic that is behind - and tightly intertwined with - the grammar of human language. In this book, some of the most prominent figures in linguistics, including Noam Chomsky and Barbara H. Partee, offer new insights into the nature of linguistic meaning and pave the way for the further development of formal semantics and formal pragmatics. Each chapter investigates various dimensions in which the logical nature of human language manifests itself within a language and/or across languages. Phenomena like bare plurals, free choice items, scalar implicatures, intervention effects, and logical operators are investigated in depth and at times cross-linguistically and/or experimentally. This volume will be of interest to scholars working within the fields of semantics, pragmatics, language acquisition and psycholinguistics.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Abrusán, Marta (in press). “Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers.” Linguistics and Philosophy.
Abrusán, Marta and Benjamin Spector (2011). “A semantics for degree questions based on intervals: negative islands and their obviation.” Journal of Semantics 28: 107–147.
Abusch, Dorit (2010). “Presupposition triggering from alternatives.” Journal of Semantics 27: 37–80.
Adams, Catherine (1990). “Syntactic comprehension in children with expressive language impairment.” British Journal of Disorders of Communication 25: 149–171.
Adani, Flavia, Heather van der Lely, Matteo Forgiarini, and Maria Teresa Guasti (2010). “Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: a comprehension study with Italian children.” Lingua 120: 2148–2166.
Aloni, Maria (2001). “Quantification under conceptual covers.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Aloni, Maria (2007a). “Expressing ignorance or indifference. Modal implicatures in BiOT.” In Balder David ten Cate and Henk Zeevat, eds., Proceedings of the Sixth International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation (TbiLLC), 1–20. Batumi, Georgia.
Aloni, Maria (2007b). “Free choice, modals and imperatives.” Natural Language Semantics 15: 65–94.
Aloni, Maria (2012). “On epistemic indefinites: a note on emphatic free choice uses.” In Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya, and Rick Nouwen, eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Aloni, Maria and Angelika Port (2010). “Epistemic indefinites crosslinguistically.” In Lena Fainleib, Nicholas LaCara, and Yangsook Park, eds., Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 41. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Aloni, Maria and Angelika Port (2011). “On epistemic indefinites.” Talk given at Sinn und Bedeutung 16, University of Utrecht, September 6.
Aloni, Maria and Floris Roelofsen (2011). “Indefinites in comparatives.” In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches, and David Lutz, eds., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 21, 19–38. Ithaca, NY: Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
Aloni, Maria and Robert van Rooij (2004). “Free choice items and alternatives.” In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer, and Joost Zwarts, eds., Proceedings of the KNAW Academy Colloquium: Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (KNAW), 5–26. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis (2009). “Even and biased questions: the case of Spanish siquiera.” In Ed Cormany, Satoshi Ito, and David Lutz, eds., Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 19, 1–18. eLanguage.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis and Paula Menéndez-Benito (2008). “Minimal domain widening.” In Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, eds., WCCFL 27: Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 36–44. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis and Paula Menéndez-Benito (2010). “Modal indefinites.” Natural Language Semantics 18: 1–31.
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis and Paula Menéndez-Benito (2011). “Expressing indifference: Spanish un NP cualquiera.” In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches, and David Lutz, eds., Proceedings of Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 21, 333–352. Ithaca, NY: Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Arosio, Fabrizio, Flavia Adani, and Maria Teresa Guasti (2009). “Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children.” In José Brucart, Anna Gavarrò, and Jaune Sola, eds., Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation and Acquisition, 138–158. Oxford University Press.
Bach, Emmon (1989). Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Bach, Emmon and Barbara H. Partee (1980). “Anaphora and semantic structure.” In Jody Kreiman and Alerindo Ojeda, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, 1–28. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. Reprinted in Barbara H. Partee (2004). Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee, 122–152. Oxford: Blackwell.
Baker, Carl L. (1970). “Double negatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 169–186.
Barker, Chris (2011). “Free choice permission as resource sensitive reasoning.” Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–38.
Barner, David and Asaf Bachrach (2009). “Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development.” Cognitive Psychology 60: 40–62.
Barrett, Robert B. and Roger Gibson, eds. (1990). Perspectives on Quine. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barwise, Jon (1981). “Scenes and other situations.” Journal of Philosophy 78: 369–397.
Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper (1981). “Generalized quantifiers and natural language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219.
Barwise, Jon and John Perry (1981). “Situations and attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 78: 668–691.
Barwise, Jon and John Perry (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beaver, David (1994). “When variables don’t vary enough.” In Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann, eds., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) IV, 35–60. Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University.
Beaver, David (1999). “Presupposition accommodation: a plea for common sense.” In Lawrence Moss, Jonathan Ginzburg, and Maarten de Rijke, eds., Logic, Language, and Computation, Volume 2, 21–44. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Beaver, David (2001). Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Beaver, David (2006). “The proviso problem: comments on von Fintel.” Paper presented at Workshop On Presupposition Accomodation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, October 14.
Beaver, David and Bart Geurts (2011). “Presupposition.” In Edward Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/presupposition/.
Beaver, David and Emiel Krahmer (2001). “A partial account of presupposition projection.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 147–182.
Beck, Sigrid. (2006). “Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56.
Belletti, Adriana (2008). “The CP of clefts.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 191–204.
Belletti, Adriana (2009). Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.
Belletti, Adriana and Carla Contemori (2010). “Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults.” In João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo, and Fernanda Pratas, eds., Language Acquisition and Development, 3. Proceedings of Gala 2009, 39–52. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (CSP).
Belletti, Adriana and Carla Contemori (to appear). “Subjects in children’s object relatives.” Revue Roumaine de Linguistique.
Belletti, Adriana, Naama Friedmann, Dominique Brunato, and Luigi Rizzi (2012). “Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian.” Lingua 122: 1053–1069.
Berwick, Robert C. (1985). The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bever, Thomas G. (1974). “The ascent of the specious, or there is a lot we don’t know about mirrors.” In David Cohen, ed., Explaining Linguistic Phenomena, 173–200. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Pancheva (2004). “Late merger of degree clauses.” Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–46.
Bierwisch, Manfred (1989). “The semantics of gradation.” In Manfred Bierwisch and Ewald Lang, eds., Dimensional Adjectives, 71–262. Berlin: Springer.
Bishop, Dorothy V. M. (1993). Test for Reception of Grammar. Test available from the author at the University of Manchester.
Bishop, Dorothy V. M. and Elizabeth Bourne (1985). “Do young children understand comparatives?British Journal of Developmental Psychology 3: 123–132.
Booth, Amy E. and Sandra Waxman (2003). “Mapping words to the world in infancy: infants’ expectations for count nouns and adjectives.” Journal of Cognition and Development 4: 357–381.
Boster, Carole and Stephen Crain (1993). “On children’s understanding of Every and Or.” Proceedings of Early Cognition and Transition to Language, University of Texas at Austin.
Braine, Martin D. S., and Barbara Rumain (1981). “Development of comprehension of ‘or’: evidence for a sequence of competencies.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 46–70.
Breheny, Richard (2008). “A new look at the semantics and pragmatics of numerically quantified noun phrases.” Journal of Semantics 25: 93–139.
Brisson, Christine (1998). “Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers.” Ph.D. thesis. Rutgers University.
Brown, H. Douglas (1971). “Children’s comprehension of relativized English sentences.” Child Development 42: 1923–1936.
Brown, Roger W. (1958). Words and Things: an Introduction to Language. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Brown, Roger W. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bultinck, Bert (2005). Numerous Meanings: The Meaning of English Cardinals and the Legacy of Paul Grice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Büring, Daniel (2007). “More or less.” In Malcolm Elliott, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki, and Suwon Yoon, eds., Papers from the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS). Volume 1: The Main Session. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Carlson, Gregory N. (1977). “Reference to kinds in English.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carlson, Gregory N. (1989). “The semantic contribution of English generic sentences.” In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner, eds., Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. II, 167–192. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Carlson, Gregory N. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, eds. (1995). The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press.
Carston, Robyn (1988). “Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics.” In Ruth Kempson, ed., Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, 155–181. Cambridge University Press.
Carston, Robyn (1998). “Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature.” In Robyn Carston and Seiji Uchida, eds., Relevance theory: Applications and Implications, 179–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Charlow, Simon (2009). “‘Strong’ predicative presuppositional objects.” In Nathan Klinedinst and Daniel Rothschild, (eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 European Summer School of Logic, Language, and Information Workshop: New Directions in the Theory of Presupposition.
Chemla, Emmanuel (2009a). “Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data.” Natural Language Semantics 17: 299–340.
Chemla, Emmanuel (2009b). “Universal implicatures and free choice effects: experimental data.” Semantics and Pragmatics 2: 1–33.
Chemla, Emmanuel and Philippe Schlenker (in press). “Incremental vs. symmetric accounts of presupposition projection: an experimental approach.” Natural Language Semantics.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1982a). “English bare plurals, mass nouns, and nominalization.” In Daniel Flickinger, Marlys Macken and Nancy Wiegand, eds., Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 1), 243–255. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1982b). “Nominalization and Montague Grammar. A semantics without types for natural languages.” Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 303–354.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1983a). “On plural and mass nominals and the structure of the world.” In Toni Borowski and Daniel Finer, eds., University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics VIII, 17–45. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachussetts (GLSA).
Chierchia, Gennaro (1983b). “Outline of a semantic theory of (obligatory) control.” In Michael Barlow, Daniel Flickinger, and Michael Wescoat, eds., Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 2), 19–31. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1984a). “Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachussetts, Amherst. [Also published by Garland Publishing Inc., New York and London, 1988]
Chierchia, Gennaro (1984b). “Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds.” In Mark Cobler, Susanna MacKaye, and Michael Wescoat, eds., Proceedings of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 3), 28–39. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistic Association.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1985). “Formal semantics and the grammar of predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 417–443.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1988a). “Aspects of a categorial theory of Binding.” In Richard Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Deirdre Wheeler, eds., Categorial Grammar and Natural Language Structures, 125–152. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Reidel.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1988b). “Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and donkey anaphora.” In Manfred Krifka, ed., Genericity in Natural Language, 53–84. University of Tübingen.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1989). “Anaphora and attitudes de se.” In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, and Peter van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression, 1–31. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1995). Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. University of Chicago Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1998). “Reference to kinds across languages.” Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405
Chierchia, Gennaro (2004). “Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface.” In Adriana Belletti, ed., Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, 39–103. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro (2006). “Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the ‘logicality’ of language.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590.
Chierchia, Gennaro (2010). “Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation.” Synthese 174: 99–149.
Chierchia, Gennaro (to appear a). “Logic in grammar: polarity, free choice, and intervention.” Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro (to appear b). “Free choice nominals and free choice disjunction: the identity thesis.” In Anamaria Fălăuş, ed., Alternatives in Semantics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, and Luisa Meroni (2001). “The acquisition of disjunction: evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures.” In Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez, and Aimee Johansen, eds., Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 157–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, and Rosalind Thornton (1998). “‘Some’ and ‘or’: a study on the emergence of logical form.” In Annabel Greenhill, Mary Hughes, Heather Littlefield, and Hugh Walsh, eds., Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 97–108. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox, and Benjamin Spector (2012). “The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics.” In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, eds., Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning Vol. III. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, Luisa Meroni, Stephen Crain, and Francesca Foppolo (2004). “Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of or.” In Ira Noveck and Dan Sperber, eds., Experimental Pragmatics, 283–300. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chierchia, Gennaro and Pauline Jacobson (1986). “Local and long distance control.” In Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe, and Joyce McDonough, eds., Proceedings of the XVIth Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS 16), 57–74. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts (GSLA).
Chierchia, Gennaro and Sally McConnell-Ginet (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [substantially revised second edition: 2000]
Chierchia, Gennaro, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner (1989a). “Introduction.” In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turer, eds., Properties, Types and Meaning. Volume I: Foundational Issues, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner eds. (1989b). Properties, Types and Meaning. Volume I: Foundational Issues. Volume II: Semantic Issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chierchia, Gennaro and Mats Rooth (1984). “Configurational notions in Discourse Representation Theory.” In Charles Jones and Peter Sells, eds., Proceedings of the XIVth Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS 14), 49–63. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts (GSLA).
Chierchia, Gennaro and Raymond Turner (1988). “Semantics and property theory.” Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 261–302.
Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (1966). Cartesian Linguistics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam (1975). Reflections on Language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (1996). Powers and Prospects: Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order. London: Pluto Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2000a). “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step – Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2000b). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2001). “Derivation by phase.” In Michael Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam (2008). “On phases.” In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, eds., Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo (1990). Types of A′ Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo ed. (2002). The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. I. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Eve V. (1971). “On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10: 266–275.
Clark, Eve V. (1972). “On the child’s acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fields.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11: 750–758.
Clark, Herbert H. (1970). “The primitive nature of children’s relational concepts.” In John Hayes, ed., Cognition and the Development of Language, 269–278. New York, NY: Wiley.
Clark, Herbert H. (1973). “Space, time, semantics, and the child.” In Timothy Moore, ed., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, 27–63. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Condoravdi, Cleo (1997). Descriptions in Context. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
Contemori, Carla and Adriana Belletti (2011). “Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian speaking children and adults: intervention in production and comprehension.” Manuscript, University of Siena.
Crain, Stephen (2008). “The interpretation of disjunction in universal grammar.” Language and Speech 51: 151–169.
Crain, Stephen (2012). The Emergence of Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro, and Utako Minai (2007). “Hidden units in child language.” In Andrea C. Schalley and Drew Khlentzos, eds., Mental States Evolution, Function and Nature, 275–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro, and Rosalind Thornton (2006). “Language acquisition is language change.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 31–49.
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro, Pheng Zhou, and Anna Notley (2012). “Polarity meets focus in child language.” Presented at the Linguistic Society of America’s Eighty-Sixth Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, USA, January 5–8.
Crain, Stephen, Andrea Gualmini, and Paul Pietroski (2005). “Brass tacks in linguistic theory: innate grammatical principles.” In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich, eds., The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents, 175–197. Oxford University Press.
Crain, Stephen and Drew Khlentzos (2008). “Is logic innate?Biolinguistics 2: 24–56.
Crain, Stephen and Drew Khlentzos (2010). “The Logic instinct.” Mind and Language 25: 30–65.
Crain, Stephen, Weija Ni, and Laura Conway (1994). “Learning, parsing and modularity.” In Chuck Clifton, Lyn Frazier and Keith Rayner, eds., Perspectives on Sentence Processing, 443–468. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crain, Stephen, and Rosalind Thornton (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crain, Stephen, and Rosalind Thornton (2006). “Acquisition of syntax and semantics.” In Matthew Traxler and Morton Gernsbacher, eds., Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edition, 1073–1110. London: Elsevier.
Cresswell, Maxwell J. (1973). Logics and Languages. London: Methuen.
Cresswell, Maxwell J. (1976). “The semantics of degree.” In Barbara H. Partee, ed., Montague Grammar, 261–292. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Crnič, Luka (2011a). “Getting even.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Crnič, Luka (2011b). “On the meaning and distribution of concessive scalar particles.” In Lena Fainleib, Nick LaCara, and Tangsook Park, eds., Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 41. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Cruse, David Alan (1980). “Antonyms and gradable complementaries.” Perspektiven der Lexikalischen Semantik: Beitrage zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2–3: 14–25.
Dalrymple, Mary Makoto, Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo, and Stanley Peters (1998). “Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–210.
Dayal, Veneeta (1992). “The singular-plural distinction in Hindi generics.” In Chris Barker, and David Dowty, eds., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 2), OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 40, 39–58. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Dayal, Veneeta (1996). Locality in Wh Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi. Dodrecht: Kluwer.
Dayal, Veneeta (1997). “Free relatives and ever: identity and free choice readings.” In Aaron Lawson, ed., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 7), 99–116. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Dayal, Veneeta (1999). “Bare NP’s, reference to kinds, and incorporation.” In Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, eds., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistics Theory (SALT 9), 34–51. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Dayal, Veneeta (2004). “Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393–450.
Dayal, Veneeta (2009). “Variation in English free choice items.” In Rajat Mohanty and Mythili Menon, eds., Universals and Variation: Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VII, 237–256.
Dayal, Veneeta (2011a). “Bare noun phrases.” In Claudia Maeinborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, eds., Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. II, 1087–1108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dayal, Veneeta (2011b). “Hindi pseudo incorporation.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 123–167.
Dayal, Veneeta (in prep). Bare Noun Phrases, Genericity and (In)definiteness: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dennett, Daniel (2012). “Sakes and dints, and other definitions that philosophers really need not seek.” Times Literary Supplement, March 2, 12–14.
De Villiers, Jilles, Peter De Villiers, and Esme Hoban (1994). “The central problem of functional categories in the English syntax of oral deaf children.” In Helen Tager-Flusberg, ed., Constraints on Language Acquisition: Studies of Atypical Children, 9–47. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
De Vincenzi, Marica (1991). Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian: The Minimal Chain Principle. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Diesing, Molly (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donaldson, Margaret and George Balfour (1968). “Less is more: a study of language comprehension in children.” British Journal of Psychology 59: 461–471.
Donaldson, Margaret and Roger Wales (1970). “On the acquisition of some relational terms.” In John Hayes, ed., Cognition and the Development of Language, 235–268. New York, NY: Wiley.
Donati, Caterina and Carlo Cecchetto (2011). “Relabeling heads: a unified account for relativization structures.” Linguistic Inquiry 42: 519–560.
Dowty, David (1987). “Collective predicates, distributive predicates and all.” In Fred Marshall, Ann Miller, and Zheng-sheng Zhang, eds., Proceedings of Third ESCOL Meeting, 97–125. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Dummett, Michael (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambdrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ebeling, Karen S. and Susan Gelman (1988). “Coordination of size standards by young children.” Child Development 59: 888–896.
Eckardt, Regine (2007). “Licensing or.” In Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, eds., Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, 34–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elbourne, Paul (2011). Meaning: A Slim Guide to Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Enç, Mürvet M. (1981). “Tense without scope: an analysis of nouns as indexicals.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Enç, Mürvet M. (1987). “Anchoring conditions for tense.” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–657.
Fălăuş, Anamaria (2009). “Polarity items and dependent indefinites in Romanian.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Nantes.
Fălăuş, Anamaria (2011). “Alternatives as sources of semantic dependency.” In Nan Li and David Lutz, eds., Proceedings from Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT 20), 406–427. eLanguage.
Fălăuş, Anamaria (2012). “(Partially) free choice of alternatives.” Manuscript, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
Farkas, Donka (2002). “Extreme non-specificity in Romanian.” In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, and Paola Monachesi, eds., Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000, 127–151. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Farkas, Donka (2006). “Free choice in Romanian.” In Betty Birner and Gregory Ward, eds., Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, 71–94. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fauconnier, Gilles (1975). “Pragmatic scales and logical structure.” Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–375.
Feferman, Solomon (1985). “Intensionality in mathematics.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 14: 41–55.
Fintel, Kai von (2000a). “Singleton indefinites (re. Schwarzschild 2000).” Handout from a talk to MIT Syntax-Semantics Reading Group. http://web.mit.edu/fintel/fintel-2000-singleton.pdf.
Fintel, Kai von (2000b). “What is presupposition accommodation?” Manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://mit.edu/fintel/fintel-2000-accomm.pdf.
Fintel, Kai von (2000c). “Whatever.” In Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, eds., Proceedings from Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT 10), 27–39. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Also on eLangauge: http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/10.27/1708
Fintel, Kai von (2008). “What is presupposition accommodation, again?Philosophical Perspectives 22: 137–170.
Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1990). “Indeterminacy and mental states.” In Robert Barrett and Roger Gibson, eds., Perspectives on Quine, 98–109. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Foppolo, Francesca, Maria Teresa Guasti, and Gennaro Chierchia (2012). “Scalar implicatures in child language: give children a chance.” Language Learning and Development 8: 365–395.
Foppolo, Francesca and Francesca Panzeri (in press). “Do children know when their room counts as clean?” In Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS 40). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts (GSLA).
Fox, Danny (2007a). “Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures.” In Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, eds., Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, 71–120. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fox, Danny (2007b). “Too many alternatives: density, symmetry and other predicaments.” In Masayuki Gibson and Tova Friedman, eds., Proceedings from Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT 17), 89–111. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Fox, Danny (2008). “Two short notes on Schlenker’s theory of presupposition projection.” Theoretical Linguistics 34: 237–252.
Fox, Danny (2011). “Presupposition projection, trivalence and relevance.” HUJI / TAU Syntax Semantics Reading Group, November/December 2011. http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~dfox/Talks_files/presup%20and%20rel-new.pdf.
Fox, Danny, and Martin Hackl (2006). “The universal density of measurement.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 537–586.
Fox, Danny, and Roni Katzir (2011). “On the characterization of alternatives.” Natural Language Semantics 19: 87–107.
Franke, Michael (2009). “Signal to act: game theory in pragmatics.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Franke, Michael (2011). “Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation.” Semantics and Pragmatics 4: 1–82.
Frauenfelder, Ulrich, Jacques Mehler, and Juan Segui (1980). “Monitoring around the relative clause.” Journal of Memory and Language: 19328–337.
Frege, Gottlob (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Translated into English as The Foundations of Arithmetic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1980.
Friedman, Joyce, Douglas Moran, and David Warren (1978a). “An interpretation system for Montague grammar.” American Journal of Computational Linguistics microfiche 74:23–96. acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J79/J79–1074.pdf.
Friedman, Joyce, Douglas Moran, and David Warren (1978b). “Explicit finite intensional models for PTQ.” American Journal of Computational Linguistics microfiche 74:3–22. acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J79/J79–1074.pdf.
Friedmann, Naama and Rama Novogrodsky (2004). “The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development.” Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681.
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti, and Luigi Rizzi (2009). “Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies.” Lingua 119: 67–88.
Gallistel, Charles R. (1990). “Representations in animal cognition: an introduction.” Cognition 37:1–22. Reprinted in Charles Gallistel, ed. (1991). Animal Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gajewski, Jon (2012). “L-Analyticity and natural language.” Manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gathercole, Virginia C. (1979). “The acquisition of more and less. A critical review.” In Geoffrey Garthercole and Kurt Godden, eds., Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 4 No. 2.
Gazdar, Gerald J. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Gazdar, Gerald J. (1982). “Phrase structure grammar.” In Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey Pullum, eds., The Nature of Syntactic Representation, 131–186. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
George, Benjamin R. (2008). “Predicting presupposition projection: some alternatives in the strong Kleene tradition.” University of California, Los Angeles. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DY0YTgxN/.
George, Benjamin R. (2010). “A new case for an old logic: reviving strong Kleene approaches to presupposition projection.” Manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
Gelman, Susan A., and Karen Ebeling (1989). “Children’s use of nonegocentric standards in judgments of functional size.” Child Development 60: 920–932.
Gentner, Dedre and Laura Namy (2006). “Analogical processes in language learning.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 15: 297–301.
Gerstner-Link, Claudia and Manfred Krifka (1993). “Genericity.” In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, eds., Handbuch der Syntax, 966–978. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Geurts, Bart (1996). “Local satisfaction guaranteed: a presupposition theory and its problems.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 259–294.
Geurts, Bart (2006). “Take ‘five’: the meaning and use of a number word.” In Svetlana Vogeleer and Liliane Tasmowski, eds., Non-definiteness and Plurality, 311–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Geurts, Bart (2011). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Geurts, Bart and Rick Nouwen (2007). “At Least et al.: the semantics of scalar modifiers.” Language 83: 533–559.
Geurts, Bart and Nausicaa Pouscoulous (2009). “Free choice for all: a response to Emmanuell Chemla.” Semantics and Pragmatics 2: 1–10.
Giannakidou, Anastasia (2007). “The landscape of even.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 39–81.
Giannakidou, Anastasia and Josep Quer (2011). “Against universal free choice: free choice and referentially vague indefinites in Greek, Catalan, and Spanish.” Manuscript, University of Chicago and Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Gibson, Edward (1998). “Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.” Cognition 68: 1–76.
Gillies, Anthony S. (2004). “Epistemic conditionals and conditional epistemics.” Noûs 38: 585–616.
Gleitman, Lila R., and Barbara Landau (2012). “Every child an isolate: nature’s experiments in language learning.” In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini and Robert Berwick, eds., Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford University Press.
Goetz, Stewart, and Charles Taliaferro (2011). A Brief History of the Soul. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goldberg, Adele (2003). “Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language.” Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 219–224.
Goldberg, Adele (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford University Press.
Goodluck, Helen (2010). “Object extraction is not subject to child relativized minimality.” Lingua 120: 1516–1521.
Gordon, Peter C., Randall Hendrick, and Marcus Johnson (2001). “Memory interference during language processing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27: 1411–1423.
Gordon, Peter C., Randall Hendrick, and Marcus Johnson (2004). “Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity.” Journal of Memory and Language 51: 97–114.
Goro, Takuya (2004). “The emergence of universal grammar in the emergence of language: the acquisition of Japanese logical connectives and positive polarity.” Manuscript, University of Maryland at College Park.
Goro, Takuya (2007). “Language-specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition.” Ph.D. Thesis. University of Maryland at College Park.
Goro, Takuya, and Sachie Akiba (2004a). “The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese.” In Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo Rodríguez, and Benjamin Schmeiser, eds., Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 23), 251–264. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Goro, Takuya and Sachie Akiba (2004b). “Japanese disjunction and the acquisition of positive polarity.” In Yukio Otsu, ed., Proceedings of the 5th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (TCP), 243–254. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Grice, H. Paul (1975). “Logic and conversation.” In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof (1984). “Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, and Luisa Meroni (2000). “Acquisition of disjunction in conditional sentences.” In S. Catherine Howell, Sarah Fish, and Thea Keith-Lucas, eds., Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 367–378. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Gualmini, Andrea, Luisa Meroni, and Stephen Crain (2003). “An asymmetric universal in child language.” In Matthias Weisgerber, ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 7, 136–148. Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft (Konstanz linguistics working papers), vol. 114. Universität Konstanz, Germany.
Gualmini, Andrea and Bernard Schwarz (2009). “Solving learnability problems in the acquisition of semantics.” Journal of Semantics 26: 185–215.
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Gennaro Cherchia, Stephen Crain, Francesca Foppolo, Andrea Gualmini, and Luisa Meroni (2005). “Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures.” Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 667–696.
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Stavroula Stavrakaki, and Fabrizio Arosio (2008). “Number and case in the comprehension of relative clauses: evidence from Italian and Greek.” In Anna Gavarró and M. João Freitas, eds., Language Acquisition and Development, 230–240. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (CSP).
Guerzoni, Elena (2008). “Even-NPIs in yes/no questions.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 319–343.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski (1993). “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.” Language 69: 274–307.
Hackl, Martin (2000). “Comparative quantifiers.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Håkansson, Gisela and Kristina Hansson (2000). “Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children.” Journal of Child Language 27: 313–333.
Hall, D. Geoffrey, Sandra Waxman, and Wendy Hurwitz (1993). “How two- and four-year-old children interpret adjectives and count nouns.” Child Development 64: 1651–1664.
Hamann, Cornelia, and Laurie Tuller (2010). “Relative clause production in French children and adolescents.” Manuscript, University of Oldenburg-Université de Tours.
Haspelmath, Martin (1997). Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford University Press.
Heim, Irene (1982). “The semantics of definite and indefinite NP’s.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, Irene (1983a). “File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness”. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, eds., Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, 164–189. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Heim, Irene (1983b). “On the projection problem for presuppositions.” In Michael Barlow, Daniel Flickinger, and Michael Wescoat, eds., Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 2), 114–125. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.
Heim, Irene (1992). “Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs.” Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221.
Heim, Irene (2000). “Degree operators and scope.” In Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, eds., Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Heim, Irene (2006). “A note on the proviso problem.” Handout from Milan Meeting, Gargnano.
Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Heller, Daphna and Linsey Wolter (2011). “On identification and transworld identity in natural language: the case of –ever free relatives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 169–199.
Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth Traugott (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. (1972). “On the semantic properties of logical operators in English.” Ph.D. thesis. University of California Los Angeles.
Huang, James (1982). “Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Huang, Yi Ting, and Jesse Snedeker (2009). “From meaning to inference: evidence for the distinction between lexical semantics and scalar implicature in online processing and development.” Manuscript, Harvard University.
Huang, Yi Ting, Jesse Snedeker, and Elizabeth Spelke (2009). “What exactly do numbers mean?” Manuscript, Harvard University.
Horn, Laurence (1989). A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.
Horn, Laurence (1992) “The said and the unsaid.” In Chris Barker and David Dowty, eds., Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 2, 163–192. Columbus, OH: OSU Working Papers in Linguistics.
Horn, Laurence (1996a). “Exclusive company: only and the dynamics of vertical inference.” Journal of Semantics 13: 1–40.
Horn, Laurence (1996b). “Presupposition and implicature.” In Shalom Lappin, ed., The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 299–319. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hurewitz, Felicia, Anna Papafragou, Lila Gleitman, and Rochel Gelman (2007). “Asymmetries in the acquisition of numbers and quantifiers.” Language Learning and Development 2: 77–96.
Ionin, Tania and Ora Matushansky (2006). “The composition of complex cardinals.” Journal of Semantics 23: 315–360.
Jayez, Jacques and Luciana Tovena (2006). “Epistemic determiners.” Journal of Semantics, 23: 217–250.
Jayez, Jacques and Luciana Tovena (2008). “Evidentiality and determination.” In Atle Grønn, ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 12, 271–286. Oslo: Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo.
Jing, Chunyuan, Stephen Crain, and Ching-Fen Hsu (2005). “Interpretation of focus in Chinese: child and adult language.” In Yukio Otsu, ed., Proceedings of the Sixth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 165–190. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Jubien, Michael (1989). “On properties and property theory.” In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee, and Raymond Turner, eds., Properties, Types and Meanings. Vol. I: Foundational Issues, 159–176. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman (1993). “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422.
Kamp, Hans (1973). “Free choice permission.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74: 57–74.
Kamp, Hans (1981). “A theory of truth and semantic representation.” In Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, eds., Formal Methods in the Study of Language; Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre. Reprinted in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, eds. (1984). Truth, Interpretation, Information GRASS 2, 1–41. Dordrecht: Foris. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds. (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 189–222. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kamp, Hans and Barbara Partee (1995). “Prototype theory and compositionality.” Cognition 57: 129–191.
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Karttunen, Lauri (1974). “Presupposition and linguistic context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–193.
Katsos, Napoleon and Dorothy Bishop (2011). “Pragmatic tolerance: implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature.” Cognition 120: 67–81.
Katzir, Roni., and Ray Singh (2010). “A note on presupposition accommodation.” Manuscript, Cornell University and Carleton University.
Kaufmann, Magdalena (2012). Interpreting Imperatives. Berlin: Springer.
Keenan, Edward L., and Jonathan Stavi (1986). “A semantic characterization of natural language determiners.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 253–326.
Kegley, Charles W., and Jacquelyn Kegley (1978). Introduction to Logic. Lanham, MD: University Press.
Kennedy, Christopher (1999). Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York, NY: Garland Press. [Also Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1997]
Kennedy, Christopher (2007). “Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45.
Kennedy, Christopher (2011). “A neo-Fregean semantics for number words.” Paper presented at Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 24), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, May 20–22.
Kennedy, Christopher and Louise McNally (2005). “Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates.” Language 81: 345–381.
Kennedy, Christopher and Jason Stanley (2009). “On average.” Mind 118: 583–646.
King, Jonathan and Marcel Adam Just (1991). “Individual differences in syntactic processing: the role of working memory.” Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580–602.
Klatzky, Roberta L., Eve Clark, and Marlys Macken (1973). “Asymmetries in the acquisition of polar adjectives: linguistic or conceptual?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16: 32–46.
Klein, Ewan (1980). “A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy41–45.
Klein, Ewan (1991). “Comparatives.” In Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, eds., Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 673–691. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Klibanoff, Raquel S. and Sandra Waxman (2000). “Basic level object categories support the acquisition of novel adjectives: evidence from preschool-aged children. Child Development 71: 649–659.
Klinedinst, Nathan (2006). “Plurality and possibility.” Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre (1991). “Scalar predicates and negation: punctual semantics and interval interpretations.” In Lise Dobrin, Lynn Nichols, and Rosa Rodriguez, eds., Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 27, 140–155. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Krahmer, Emiel (1998). Presupposition and Anaphora. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika (1979). “Conditional necessity and possibility.” In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli and Arnim von Stechow, eds., Semantics from Different Points of View, 117–147. Dodrecht: Springer.
Kratzer, Angelika (1986). “Conditionals.” In Anne M. Farley, Peter Farley and KarlEric McCollough, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 115–135. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Kratzer, Angelika (1995). “Stage-level and individual-level predicates.” In Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffrey Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book, 125–175. University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds. (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 289–323. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kratzer, Angelika (2005). “Indefinites and the operators they depend on: from Japanese to Salish.” In Greg Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, eds., Reference and Quantification. The Partee Effect, 113–142. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika (2011). “Situations in natural language semantics.” In Edward Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/situations-semantics/.
Kratzer, Angelika and Junko Shimoyama (2002). “Indeterminate pronouns: the view from Japanese.” In Yukio Otsu, ed., The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi.
Krifka, Manfred (1989). “Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics.” In Renate Bartsch, Johann van Benthem, and Peter van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression, 75–115. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Krifka, Manfred (1995). “The Semantics and pragmatics of polarity items.” Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257.
Krifka, Manfred (1999). “At least some determiners aren’t determiners.” In Ken Turner, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 257–291. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link (1995). “Genericity: an introduction.” In Gregory Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book, 1–124. University of Chicago Press.
Kripke, Saul (1979). “A puzzle about belief.” In Avishai Margalit, ed., Meaning and Use, 239–283. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Kroch, Anthony (1972). “Lexical and inferred meanings for some time adverbs.” Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 104, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Kroch, Anthony (1974). “The semantics of scope in English.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Ladusaw, William (1979). “Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Texas, Austin.
Lahiri, Uptal (1998). “Focus and negative polarity in Hindi.” Natural Language Semantics, 6: 57–123.
Lahiri, Uptal (2010). “Some evens are “even if. . . only”: The concessive even in Spanish.” Manuscript. Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Landau, Barbara and Lila Gleitman (1985). Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Landman, Fred (1986). “Pegs and alecs.” In Josepph Y. Halpern, ed., TARK ‘86 Proceedings of the 1986 Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, 45–61. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Longer version in Fred Landman (1986). Towards a Theory of Information. The Status of Partial Objects in Semantics, 97–155. Dordrecht: Foris.
Landman, Fred (2003). “Predicate argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites.” In Martine Coene and Yves d’Hulst, eds., From NP to DP Volume, 211–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landman, Fred (2004). Indefinites and the Type of Sets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lasersohn, Peter N. (1995). Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lasersohn, Peter N. (1999). “Pragmatic halos.” Language 75: 522–551.
Lassiter, Daniel (to appear). “Quantificational and modal interveners in degree constructions.” In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 24).
Lauer, Sven (2010). “Some news on irgendein and algún.” Talk given at the Workshop on Epistemic Indefinites, University of Göttingen, June 10–12.
Layton, Thomas L., and Sheldon Stick (1979). “Comprehension and production of comparatives and superlatives.” Journal of Child Language 6: 511–527.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, David (1970). “General semantics.” Synthese 22:18–67. Reprinted in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, eds. (1972). Semantics of Natural Language, 169–218. Dordrecht: D. Reidel and in Barbara Partee, ed., (1976) Montague Grammar, 1–50. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Lewis, David (1975). “Adverbs of quantification.” In Edward Keenan, ed., Formal Semantics of Natural Languages, 3–15. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, David (1979a). “Attitudes de dicto and de se.” The Philosophical Review 88: 513–543. Reprinted (with postscripts) in David Lewis (1983). Philosophical Papers. Volume I, 131–159. Oxford University Press.
Lewis, David (1979b). “Scorekeeping in a language game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds. (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 162–177. Oxford Blackwell.
Liao, Hsiu-Chen (2011). “Alternatives and exhaustification: non-interrogative uses of Chinese Wh-words.” Ph.D. thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Lieven, Elena V. M., Julian Pine, and Gillian Baldwin (1997). “Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development.” Journal of Child Language 24: 187–219.
Link, Godehard (1983). “The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach.” In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, eds., Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds., (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 127–146. Oxford: Blackwell.
Longobardi, Giuseppe (1994). “Reference and proper names.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.
Ludlow, Peter (2003). “Referential semantics for I-languages?” In Louise Antony and Norbert Hornstein, eds., Chomsky and His Critics, 140–162. Oxford: Blackwell.
MacWhinney, Brian (2002). “The gradual emergence of language.” In Talmi Givón and Betram Malle, eds., The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-language, 231–263. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Magri, Giorgio (2011). “Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments.” Semantics and Pragmatics 4: 1–51.
Malamud, Sophia Alexandra (forthcoming). “The meaning of plural definites: a decision-theoretic approach.” Semantics and Pragmatics.
Markman, Ellen M. (1990). “Constraints children place on word meanings.” Cognitive Science 14: 57–77.
Matsumoto, Yo (1995). “The conversational condition on horn scales.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 21–60.
Mayr, Clemens, and Benjamin Spector (2011). “Not too strong! Generalizing the scope economy condition.” In Martin Prinzhorn, Viola Schmitt, and Sarah Zobel, eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 14, 305–321. Vienna. www.univie.ac.at/sub14/proc/mayr-spector.pdf
McGilvray, James (2003). “Introduction.” In Noam Chomsky, Cartesian Linguistics, 3rd edition., 1–52. Cambridge University Press.
McKee, Cecile, Dana McDaniel, and Jesse Snedeker (1998). “Relatives children say.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 573–596.
McNally, Louise (2011). “The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the behavior of GAs.” In Rick Nouwen, Robert van Rooij, Uli Sauerland, and Hans-Christian Schmitz, eds., ViC 2009 (Papers from the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop on Vagueness in Communcation). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 6517, 151–168. Berlin: Springer.
Medina, Tamara N., Jesse Snedeker, John Trueswell, and Lila Gleitman (2011). “How words can and cannot be learned by observation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 9014–9019.
Meroni, Luisa, and Andrea Gualmini (2012). “Do you know all SI? I know some: give children a reason to compute SI.” Presented at the 13th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics.
Meroni, Luisa, Andrea Gualmini, and Stephen Crain (2006). “Everybody knows.” In Veerle van Geenhoven, ed., Semantics in Acquisition, 89–114. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mintz, Toben H., and Lila Gleitman (2002). “Adjectives really do modify nouns: the incremental and restricted nature of early adjective acquisition.” Cognition 84: 267–293.
Montague, Richard (1970). “Universal grammar.” Theoria 36: 373–398. Reprinted in Richmond Thomason, ed. (1974). Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, 222–246. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
Moravcsik, Julius (1975). “Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle’s philosophy of language.” Dialogue 14: 622–636.
Morris, Bradley J. (2008). “Logically speaking: evidence for item-based acquisition of the connectives AND & OR.” Journal of Cognition and Development 9: 67–88.
Munaro, Nicola (1999). Sintagmi Interrogativi nei Dialetti Italiani Settentrionali. Padua, Italy: Unipress.
Murphy, M. Lynne (1997). “Why adjectives occur (or don’t) in measure phrases.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Chicago, IL.
Muskens, Reinhard (1994). “A compositional discourse representation theory.” In Paul Dekker and Martin Stokhof, eds., Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, 467–486. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam (ILLC).
Musolino, Julien (2004). “The semantics and acquisition of number words: integrating linguistic and developmental perspectives.” Cognition 93: 1–41.
Musolino, Julien (2006). “On the semantics of the subset principle.” Language Learning and Development 2: 195–218.
Musolino, Julien, Stephen Crain, and Rosalind Thornton (2000). “Navigating negative quantificational space.” Linguistics 38: 1–32.
Notley, Anna, Rosalind Thornton, and Stephen Crain (2012). “English-speaking children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of 5 ‘not every’.” Biolinguistics 6: 32–69.
Notley, Anna, Pheng Zhou, Britta Jensen, and Stephen Crain (2011). “Children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of ‘before’: a comparison of English and Mandarin.” Journal of Child Language 39: 482–522.
Nouwen, Rick (2008). “Upper-bound no more: the exhaustive interpretation of non-strict comparison.” Natural Language Semantics 16: 271–295.
Nouwen, Rick (2010). “Two kinds of modified numerals.” Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–41.
Noveck, Ira A. (2001). “When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicatures.” Cognition 78: 165–188.
O’Leary, Carrie A. (1994). “Children’s awareness of polarity sensitivity.” M.A. Thesis. University of Connecticut, Storr, CO.
Palermo, David S. (1973). “More about less: a study of language comprehension.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 211–221.
Panizza, Daniele, Gennaro Chierchia, and Charles Clifton Jr. (2009). “On the role of entailment patterns and scalar implicatures in the processing of numerals.” Journal of Memory and Language, 61: 503–518.
Papafragou, Anna and Julien Musolino (2003). “Scalar implicatures at the semantic-pragmatics interface.” Cognition 80: 253–282.
Papafragou, Anna and Niki Tantalou (2004). “Children’s computation of implicatures.” Language Acquisition 12: 71–82.
Partee, Barbara H. (1973). “Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 509–534. Reprinted in Barbara Partee, ed., (1976) Montague Grammar, 51–76. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Partee, Barbara H. (1979). “Semantics – mathematics or psychology?” In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli, and Arnim von Stechow, eds., Semantics from Different Points of View, 1–14. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Partee, Barbara H. (1986a). “Ambiguous pseudoclefts with unambiguous be. In Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe, and Joyce McDonough, eds., Proceedings of NELS l6, 354–366. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Reprinted in Barabara Partee (2004). Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee, 190–202. Oxford: Blackwell.
Partee, Barbara H. (1986b). “Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles.” In Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, eds., Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, GRASS 8, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds. (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 357–381. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in Barbara Partee (2004). Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara Partee, 203–230. Oxford: Blackwell.
Partee, Barbara H. (1995). “Lexical semantics and compositionality.” In Lila Gleitman and Mark Liberman, eds., Invitation to Cognitive Science Vol. I, 311–360. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Partee, Barbara H. (2005). “Reflections of a formal semanticist as of Feb 2005.” Manuscript. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. http://people.umass.edu/partee/docs/BHP_Essay_Feb05.pdf. [A shorter version was published as: Partee, Barbara H. (2004). Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers of Barbara Partee, 1–15. Oxford Blackwell.]
Partee, Barbara H. (2011). “Formal semantics: Origins, issues, early impact.” In Barbara H. Partee, Michael Glanzberg, and Jurģis Šķilters, eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics. Discourse, Context, and Models. The Baltic Yearbook of Cogntion, Logic, and Communication. Vol. VI, 1–52. Lawrence, KS: New Prairie Press. [DOI: 10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1580]
Partee, Barbara H. and Mats Rooth (1983). “Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity.” In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, eds., Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, 361–383. Berlin: de Gruyter. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara Partee, eds. (2002). Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, 334–356. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pérez Carballo, Alejandro (2007). “A first shot at the proviso problem.” Manuscript. MIT.
Pérez Carballo, Alejandro (2009). “Toward a dissolution of the proviso problem.” In Paul Ègrè and Giorgio Magri, eds., Presuppositions and Implicatures: Proceedings of the MIT-Paris Workshop, volume 60. Cambridge, MA: MITPWL.
Peters, Stanley (1979). “A truth-conditional formulation of Karttunen’s account of presupposition.” Synthese 40: 301–316.
Pinker, Steven (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Porterfield, Leslie and Veneeta Srivastav (1988). “(In)definiteness in the absence of articles: evidence for Hindi and Indonesian.” In Hagit Borer, ed., Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 7, 265–276. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Associations, Stanford University.
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira Noveck, Guy Politzer, and Anne Bastide (2007). “A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production.” Language Acquisition 14: 347–375.
Quine, Willard V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, Willard V. O. (1992). Pursuit of Truth. Cambdrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawlins, Kyle (2008). “conditionals: an investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures.” Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Richards, Thomas J. (1978). The Language of Reason. Rushcutters Bay: Pergamon Press.
Rizzi, Luigi (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi (2004). “Locality and the left periphery.” In Adriana Belletti, ed., Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. III, 223–251. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi (2011). “Some locality principles in Italian syntax.” Manuscript, University of Siena.
Rizzi, Luigi, and Ur Shlonsky (2007). “Strategies of subject extraction.” In Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gärtner, eds., Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, 115–160. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Roberts, Ian (2001). “Head movement.” In Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, eds., The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 113–147. Oxford: Blackwell.
Romero, Maribel and Chung-hye Han (2004). “On negative yes/no questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658.
Romoli, Jacopo (2012). “Presupposition wipe-out can’t be all or nothing: a note on conflicting presuppositions.” Snippets 25. www.ledonline.it/snippets/allegati/snippets25004.pdf
Rooij, Robert van (2000). “Permission to change.” Journal of Semantics 17: 119–143.
Rooij, Robert van and Katrin Schulz (2004). “Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13: 491–519.
Rooth, Mats (1992). “A theory of focus interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Rothstein, Susan (2011). “Counting, measuring and the semantics of classifiers.” The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication. Vol. VI.Lawrence, KS: New Prairie Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4148/biyclc.v6i0.1582
Rotstein, Carmen and Yoad Winter (2004). “Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: scale structure and higher-order modifiers.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 259–288.
Sadock, Jerrold (1984). “Whither radical pragmatics.” In Deborah Schiffren, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 139–149. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Salmon, Nathan (1997). “Wholes, parts, and numbers.” Noûs Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Mind, Causation and World 31: 1–15.
Sandt, Rob van der (1989). “Presupposition and discourse structure.” In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, and Peter van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Con-textual Expression, 267–294. Dodrecht: Foris.
Sauerland, Uli (2004). “Scalar implicatures in complex sentences.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 367–391.
Sauerland, Uli (2012). “The computation of scalar implicatures: pragmatic, lexical or grammatical.” Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 36–49.
Săvescu-Ciucivara, Oana (2007). “Oarecare indefinites are not just any indefinites.” In Gabriela Alboiu, Larisa Avram, Andrei Avram, and Daniela Isac, eds., Pitar Moș: A Building with a View. Papers in Honor of Alexandra Cornilescu, 205–225. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.
Scharten, Rosemarijn (1997). “Exhaustive interpretation: a discourse-semantic account.” Ph.D. thesis. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Schlenker, Philippe (2008a). “Be articulate: a pragmatic theory of presupposition projection.” Theoretical Linguistics 34: 157–212.
Schlenker, Philippe (2008b). “Presupposition projection: the new debate.” In Tova Friedman and Satoshi Ito, eds., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 18), 655–693. eLanguage. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/18.655/1924
Schlenker, Philippe (2008c). “Local contexts” (pre-published version). http://files.nyu.edu/pds4/public/Local_Contexts_Old.pdf.
Schlenker, Philippe (2009). “Local contexts”. Semantics and Pragmatics 2: 1–74.
Schlenker, Philippe (2011). “The proviso problem: a note.” Natural Language Semantics 19: 395–422.
Schulz, Katrin (2005). “A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission.” Synthese 142: 343–377.
Schulz, Katrin and Robert van Rooij (2006). “Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: the case of exhaustive interpretation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 205–250.
Schwarzchild, Roger (2002). “Singleton indefinites.” Journal of Semantics 19: 289–314.
Sera, Maria and Linda Smith (1987). “Big and little: ‘Nominal’ and relative uses.” Cognitive Development 2: 89–111.
Seuren, Pieter A. M. (1973). “The comparative.” In Ferenç Kiefer and Nicolas Ruwet, eds., Generative Grammar in Europe, 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Sharvy, Richard (1980). “A more general theory of definite descriptions.” The Philosophical Review 89: 607–624.
Sheldon, Amy (1974). “The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 272–281.
Singh, Raj R. (2007). “Formal alternatives as a solution to the proviso problem.” In Tova Friedman and Masayuki Gibson, eds., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 17), 264–281. eLanguage. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/17.264/1854
Singh, Raj R. (2008). “Modularity and locality in interpretation.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Singh, Raj R. (2009). “Symmetric and interacting alternatives for implicature and accommodation.” In Nathan Klinedinst and Daniel Rothschild, eds., Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2009 Workshop: New Directions in the Theory of Presupposition.
Singh, Raj R. (2010). “On the structure sensitivity of the alternatives for accommodation.” Manuscript, Carlton University, Ottawa.
Smith, Carol L. (1980). “Quantifier and question answering in young children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30: 191–205.
Smith, Linda B., Nancy Cooney, and Carol McCord (1986). “What is ‘high?’ The development of reference points for ‘high’ and ‘low.’ Child Development 57: 583–602.
Smith, Linda B., Mary Jo Rattermann, and Maria Sera (1988). “Higher’ and ‘lower’: Comparative and categorical interpretations by children.” Cognitive Development 3: 341–357.
Spector, Benjamin (2005). “Aspects de la pragmatique des opérateurs logiques.” Ph.D. thesis. Université Paris 7.
Stalnaker, Robert C. (1975). “Indicative conditionals.” Philosophia 5: 269–286.
Stalnaker, Robert C. (1978). “Assertion.” In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics 9, 315–322. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Starke, Michal (2001). “Move dissolves into merge: a theory of locality.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Geneva.
Stechow, Arnim von (1984). “Comparing semantic theories of comparison.” Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.
Stoy, Joseph (1977). Denotational Semantics: The Scott-Strachey Approach to Programming Language Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Strawson, Peter F. (1950). “On referring.” Mind, New Series 59: 320–344.
Su, Esther (2011). “Disjunction and downward entailment in child Mandarin: an experimental investigation into the acquisition of semantic universals.” Ph.D. Thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney.
Sudo, Yasutada Y. (in progress). “On the semantics of phi features on pronouns.” Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Sudo, YasutadaY., Jacopo Romoli, Martin Hackl, and Danny Fox (2012). “Presupposition projection out of quantified sentences: strengthening, local accommodation and inter-speaker variation.” In Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit W. Sassoon, Katrin Schulz, and Matthijs Westera, eds., Logic, Language and Meaning. 18th Amsterdam Colloquium. Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 7218, 210–219. Springer
Syrett, Kristen (2007). “Learning about the structure of scales: adverbial modification and the acquisition of the semantics of gradable adjectives.” Ph.D. thesis. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Syrett, Kristen, Christopher Kennedy, and Jeffrey Lidz (2010). “Meaning and context in children’s understanding of GAs.” Journal of Semantics 27: 1–35.
Szabolcsi, Anna (2002). “Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity.” In István Kenesei and Peter Siptar, eds., Approaches to Hungarian, Volume 8, 217–241. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Szabolcsi, Anna (2004). “Positive polarity – negative polarity.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 409–452.
Takahashi, Shoichi (2006). “More than two quantifiers.” Natural Language Semantics 14: 57–101.
Tavakolian, Susan L. (1981). “The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses.” In Susan Tavakolian, ed., Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 167–187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taub, Alison (1989). “Collective predicates, Aktionsarten and all” in Emmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee, eds., Papers on Quantification. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts (GSLA).
Tiel, Bob van (2011). “Universal free choice?” Talk held at Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 16, University of Utrecht, September 6–8.
Tieu, Lyn (2010). “On the tri-ambiguous status of any: the view from child language.” Handout from talk at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) 4, University of Toronto, September 1.
Toledo, Assaf and Galit Sassoon (2011). “Absolute vs. relative adjectives – Variance within vs. between individuals.” In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches, and David Lutz, eds., Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 21), 135–154. eLanguage. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/21.135/2396
Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trinh, Tue (2011). “Nominal reference in two classifier languages.” Ingo Reich, Eva Horch, and Dennis Pauly, eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 15, 1–16. Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes. http://universaar.uni-saarland.de/monographien/volltexte/2011/30/pdf/SinnUndBedeutung15.pdf
Turner, Raymond (1989). “Two issues in the foundations of semantic theory.” In Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee, and Raymond Turner, eds., Properties, Types and Meaning. Vol. I: Foundational Issues, 63–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Turner, Raymond, and Kathleen Adamczyk (1984). Logic and Linguistics: A Marriage of Inconvenience. Manuscript. Amherst, MA.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle (1998). Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle (1999). “Pro properties, contra generalized kinds.” In Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, eds., Proceedings from Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 10, 221–238. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. Also available on eLanguage: http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/10.221/1730
Van Geenhoven, Veerle (2004). “For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 135–190.
Veltman, Frank (1996). “Defaults in update semantics.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 22–261.
Wal, Sjoukje van der (1996). Negative Polarity Items and Negation: Tandem Acquisition. Ph.D. thesis. University of Groningen. (Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 17)
Warren, Tessa and Edward Gibson (2002). “The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.” Cognition 85: 79–112.
Warren, Tessa and Edward Gibson (2005). “Effects of NP-type on reading English clefts.” Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 751–767.
Waters, Gloria S., David Caplan, and Nancy Hildebrandt (1987). “Working memory and written sentence comprehension.” In Max Coltheart, ed., Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, 531–555. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Waxman, Sandra R. and Amy Booth (2003). “The origins and evolution of links between word learning and conceptual organization: new evidence from 11-month-olds.” Developmental Science 6: 128–135.
Waxman, Sandra R., and Maria Teresa Guasti (2009). “Nouns, adjectives, and the acquisition of meaning: new evidence from Italian-acquiring children.” Language Learning and Development 5: 50–68.
Waxman, Sandra R., and Raquel Klibanoff (2000). “The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives.” Developmental Psychology 36: 571–581.
Wilkinson, Karina (1991). “Studies in the semantics of generic NP’s.” Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Williams, Edwin (1980). “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.
Yalcin, Seth (2007). “Epistemic modals.” Mind 116: 983–1026.
Yang, Rong (2001) “Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese.” Ph.D. thesis. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Yoon, Youngeun (1996). “Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations.” Natural Language Semantics 4: 217–236.
Zamparelli, Roberto (2007). “On singular existential quantifiers in Italian.” In Ileana Comorovski and Klaus von Heusinger, eds., Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 293–328. Springer Netherlands.
Zeevat, Henk (1989). “A compositional approach to discourse representation theory.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95–131.
Zeevat, Henk (1994). “Questions and exhaustivity in update semantics.” In Harry Bunt, Leen Kievit, Reinhard Muskens, and Margriet Verlinden, eds., Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-1). Tilburg: Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence.
Zhou, Pheng and Stepehen Crain (2011). “Children’s knowledge of the quantifier dou in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40: 155–176.
Zimmermann, Ede (2000). “Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility.” Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–290.
Zondervan, Arjen (2006). “The question under discussion focus condition for scalar implicatures.” M.A. Thesis. University of Utrecht.
Zucchi, Alessandro and Michael White (2001). “Twigs, sequences and temporal sequences of predicates.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 223–270.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.