References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2011
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Floral DiagramsAn Aid to Understanding Flower Morphology and Evolution, pp. 365 - 402Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(1935). Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae I. Floral and inflorescence anatomy and morphology. Bot. Gaz. 95, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1938). Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae II. Extremes in the range of variation of floral and inflorescence morphology. Bot. Gaz. 99, 431–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). Flowers and inflorescences of the ‘Amentiferae’. Bot. Rev. 40, 159–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998). Ontogenetic systematics, molecular developmental genetics, and the Angiosperm petal. In Molecular Systematics of Plants Ii: DNA Sequencing, ed. , and , Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Gentianaceae in context. In Gentianaceae: Systematics and Natural History, ed. and , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (1998). Circumscription of the Malvales and relationships to other Rosidae, evidence from rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 85, 876–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1999). Phylogeny of the core Malvales, evidence from ndhF sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1474–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2006). Comparative developmental series of the Mexican Triurids support a euanthial interpretation for the unusual reproductive axes of Lacandonia schismatica (Triuridaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l., analysis of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Am. J. Bot. 89, 677–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1995). Phylogenetic interrelationships in the order Primulales, with special emphasis on the family circumscriptions. Can. J. Bot. 73, 1699–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85, 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants, APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Morphology and systematics of the Scytopetalaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1925). Monocotyledons: A Morphological Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1985). The delimitation of Bignoniaceae and Scrophulariaceae based on floral anatomy, and the placement of problem genera. Am. J. Bot. 72, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989). The ontogenetic basis for corolla aestivation in Scrophulariaceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 116, 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986). Floral development in Myristica (Myristicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73, 1131–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978). Floral morphology of Horsfieldia (Myristicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 65, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Development of inflorescences, cupules, and flowers in Amphipterygium and comparison with Pistacia (Anacardiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 1237–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1860). Observations organogéniques pour servir à l'histoire des Polygalées.Adansonia 1, 174–180.Google Scholar
(1868a). Monographie des Dilléniacées. Histoire des plantes I, 2, 133–192. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
(1868b). Monographie des Magnoliacées. Histoire des Plantes I, 3, 133–192. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
(1868c). Monographie des Annonacées. Histoire des Plantes I, 4. Paris: Hachette, pp. 193–288.Google Scholar
(1870). Monographie des Elaeagnacées. Histoire des Plantes II. Paris: Hachette, pp. 487–495.Google Scholar
(1876a). Traité du développement de la fleur et du fruit X. Castanéacées. Adansonia 12, 1–17Google Scholar
(1876b). Traité du développement de la fleur et du fruit XVI. Stylidiées. Adansonia 12, 354–361.Google Scholar
and (2000). Homeosis in Araceae flowers, the case of Philodendron melinonii. Ann. Bot. 86, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. J. Exper. Bot. 57, 3471–3503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982). Oligomery and vasculature in the androecium of Mollugo nudicaulis Lam. (Molluginaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 31, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1922). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Polygonaceenblüten. Flora 115, 273–292.Google Scholar
(1999). The bicolor unit – homology and transformation of an inflorescence structure unique to core Malvales. Plant Syst. Evol. 214, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , et al. (1999). Support for an expanded family concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales, a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 129, 267–303.Google Scholar
and (1990). Die Blütenentwicklung von Theobroma cacao L. (Sterculiaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 65, 301–312.Google Scholar
and (2003). Malvaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. V, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 225–311.Google Scholar
(1999). P-type sieve-element plastids present in members of the tribes Triplareae and Coccolobeae (Polygonaceae) renew the links between the Polygonales and the Caryophyllales. Plant Syst. Evol. 214: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Floral morphology and development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the species-poor relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae. Ann. Bot. 100, 1491–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004). Floral morphology and development in Aragoa (Plantaginaceae) and related members of the order Lamiales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 723–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Development of the hypanthium and androecium in Acmena smithii and Syzygium australe (Acmena alliance, Myrtaceae). Aust. Syst. Bot. 16, 621–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1958). Die morphologische Beurteilung der Staub- und Blumenblätter der Rhamnaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 77, 423–457.Google Scholar
and (1975a). Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato I. Introduction, Parnassioideae and Brexioideae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1975b). Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato II. Saxifragoideae and Iteoideae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 661–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1930). Crassulaceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 18a, ed. and . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 352–483.Google Scholar
(2007). A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In Nectaries and Nectar, ed. , and , Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, pp. 19–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Flower structure, development, and systematics in Passifloraceae and in Abatia (Flacourtiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Androecial development and systematics in Flacourtiaceae s.l. Plant Syst. Evol. 215, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Caryophyllaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 206–236.Google Scholar
and (1996). Flower morphology and pollination biology of Clusia species from the Gran Sabana (Venezuela). Kew Bull. 51, 681–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). The floral morphology, vascular anatomy, and ontogeny of the Rhodoleioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and their significance in relation to the ‘Lower’ hamamelids. In Evolution, Systematics and Fossil History of the Hamamelidae, Vol. I, Introduction and ‘Lower’ Hamamelidae, ed. and . Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
(1963). Anatomy and development of the flower and fruit of Pereskia pititache. Am. J. Bot. 50, 843–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966). Ontogeny and structure of the flower and fruit of Pereskia aculeata. Am. J. Bot. 53, 534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). Patterns of petal and stamen reduction in Australian species of Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Floral structure and ontogeny in Globba (Zingiberaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 258, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Polygonaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 531–544.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2001). A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Plant Syst. Evol. 229, 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982). Floral development of Caulophyllum thalictroides (Berberidaceae). Can. J. Bot. 60, 2133–2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2009). Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int. J. Plant Sci., 170, 627–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1981). Floral structure and mechanism in Loasaceae. Am. J. Bot. 68, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1975). The morphology and relationships of Seemannaralia (Araliaceae). Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 33, 449–466.Google Scholar
and (2007). Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 16 714–16 719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1961). Vorlaüfige Untersuchungen über Umfang, systematische Stellung und Gliederung der Caryophyllales (Centrospermae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 36, 1–56.Google Scholar
(2001). Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with Alismatids and Acoraceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2007). Floral developmental morphology of Persea Americana (avocado, Lauraceae), the oddities of staminate organ identity. Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Floral structure and development of Acoraceae and its systematic relationships with basal Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2006). Perianth development in the basal monocot Triglochin maritima (Juncaginaceae). Aliso 22, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). Floral developmental morphology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 925–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Floral morphology and development in Dioscoreales. Feddes Repert. 111, 189–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Labiatae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Bloemontogenie en fylogenie van de Myrsinaceae en aanverwante taxa. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium: unpubl. thesis.Google Scholar
, , and (2006a). Floral development in three species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000). Floral development of three Maesa species, with special emphasis on the position of the genus within Primulales. Ann. Bot. 86, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). A floral ontogenetic study on the sister group relationship between the genus Samolus (Primulaceae) and the Theophrastaceae. Am. J. Bot. 91, 627–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006b). Floral ontogeny of Cneorum tricoccon L. (Rutaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 257, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Wood anatomy of Aextoxicaceae and Berberidopsidaceae is compatible with their inclusion in Berberidopsidales. Syst. Bot. 28, 317–325.Google Scholar
(1960). Floral structure and anatomy in the family Stylidiaceae Swartz. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 85, 189–196.Google Scholar
(1993). Portulacaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 544–555.Google Scholar
and (2000). The ontogenetic basis for floral diversity in the Baeckea sub-group. Kew Bull. 55, 593–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1958). Morphology of the staminate flowers in the Cucurbitaceae with special reference to the evolution of the stamens. Lloydia 21, 49–87Google Scholar
and (2004). Evolution in Apiales: nuclear and chloroplast markers together in (almost) perfect harmony. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 144, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Studies in the Alismataceae IX. Development of the flower in Ranalisma humile. Can. J. Bot. 69, 2790–2796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999a). Studies in the Alismataceae X. Floral organogenesis in Luronium natans (L.) Raf. Can. J. Bot. 77, 1560–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999b). Studies in the Alismataceae XI. Development of the inflorescence and flowers of Wiesneria triandra (Dalzell) Micheli. Can. J. Bot. 77, 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Studies in the Alismataceae XII. Floral organogenesis in Damasonium alisma and Baldellia ranunculoides, and comparisons with Butomus umbellatus. Can. J. Bot. 82, 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2006). Multigene analyses of monocot relationships, a summary. Aliso 22, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2002). When in doubt, put it in Flacourtiaceae: a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on plastid rbcL DNA sequences. Kew Bull. 57, 141–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007). Floral organogenesis in Tetracentron sinense (Trochodendraceae) and its systematic significance. Plant Syst. Evol. 264, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1908). Types of Floral Mechanism: A Selection of Diagrams and Descriptions of Common Flowers, part I. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
, and (2000). Diversity of cycloidea-like genes in Gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann. Bot. 86, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103, 12 017–12 020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Floral synorganization and secondary pollen presentation in four Marantaceae from Costa Rica. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). The staminal lever mechanism in Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): a review. Plant Biol. 5, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1992). Floral similarities between Plumbaginaceae and Primulaceae, systematic significance. Belg. J. Bot. 125, 151–153.Google Scholar
and (1988). The grass flower, suggestions on its origin and evolution. Flora 181, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (1995). Evolution of floral symmetry. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 350, 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). The development of the superior ovary in Tetraplasandra (Araliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91, 644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Hydrocharitaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IV, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 234–248.Google Scholar
, and (1994). Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of magnoliid Angiosperms. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl. 8, 51–72.Google Scholar
(2008). The fossil record of Angiosperms, requiem or renaissance. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 95, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2002). Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 89, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1975). A system of classification of the Angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128, 119–147.Google Scholar
(1983). General aspects of Angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord. J. Bot. 3, 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1985). The Families of the Monocotyledons: Structure, Evolution and Taxonomy. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1984). The order Myrtales: circumscription, variation and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71, 633–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1995). Floral ontogeny in the Plumbaginaceae. J. Plant Res. 108, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986). Floral structure and organogenesis in Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73, 21–32.Google Scholar
(1980). Evolution in Velloziaceae, with special reference to androecial characters. In Petaloid Monocotyledons, ed. , and . Hortic. and Botan. Research. Linnean Soc. Symposium Series 8. London: Academic Press, pp. 117–138.Google Scholar
(1985). Contribution à la morphologie comparée du gynécée des Annonaceae – Monodoroideae. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) Sér. IV, 7, 167–176.Google Scholar
(1997). Confirmation and origin of the paracarpy in Annonaceae, with comments on some methodological aspects. Candollea 52, 45–58.Google Scholar
(2000). Floral anatomy of Toussaintia hallei Le Thomas, a case of convergence of Annonaceae with Magnoliaceae. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Family Magnoliaceae, ed. , , , and . Beijing: Science Press, pp. 168–176.Google Scholar
(2007). Floral vascular pattern of the endemic Malagasy genus Fenerivia Diels (Annonaceae). Adansonia Sér. 3, 29, 7–12.Google Scholar
and (1989). Sur la systématique et les potentialités évolutives des Annonacées: cas d'Ambavia gerrardii (Baill.) Le Thomas, espèce endémique de Madagascar. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 309, Sér. III, 647–652.Google Scholar
and (1991). Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers of Acacia baileyana. Am. J. Bot. 78, 816–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). The genera of tribe Passifloreae (Passifloraceae) with special reference to flower morphology. Blumea 22, 37–50.Google Scholar
(1970). Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae VI. Stamens and young stem. J. Arnold Arbor. 51, 403–418.Google Scholar
(1975). Studies on the floral anatomy of the Cunoniaceae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Floral anatomy of the Styracaceae, including observations on intra-ovarian trichomes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 112, 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Toward a new synthesis, major evolutionary trends in the Angiosperm fossil record. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 7030–7036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). The evolution of reproductive characters in Dipsacales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S453–S464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998). Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Tr. Plant Sci. 3, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996a). Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae including Bellendena (Proteaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83, 1528–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996b). Inflorescence ontogeny and floral organogenesis in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae), with emphasis on the nature of the flower pairs. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996c). The developmental basis of diverse carpel orientations in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). The developmental basis of morphological diversification and synorganization in flowers of Conospermeae (Stirlingia and Conosperminae, Proteaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 158, S13–S48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Integrating molecular phylogenetic and paleobotanical evidence on origin of the flower. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 816–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal Angiosperms, comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S121–S153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989). Corolla and androecium development in some Eudesmia eucalypts (Myrtaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 165, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1937). Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung des pseudomonomeren Gynoeciums. Nova Acta Leopold. N. F. 5, 1–112.Google Scholar
(2000). Lauraceous flowers from the Late Cretaceous of North Carolina, U.S.A. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132, 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Floral studies of Brexia madagascariensis Thouars (Celastraceae). Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: unpubl. MSc thesis.Google Scholar
1988. Floral morphology and taxonomic relations among the genera of Amaranthaceae in the New World and the Hawaiian Islands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96, 235–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993). Molluginaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 419–426.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (1996). A phylogenetic analysis of Apocynaceae s.str. and some related taxa in Gentianales, a multidisciplinary approach. Opera Bot. Belg. 7, 59–102.Google Scholar
(1967). Systematische Studien über die verwandschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87, 431–525.Google Scholar
(1976). Die Androeciumanlage bei polyandrischen Hamamelidaceen und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 97, 436–457.Google Scholar
(1977). Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales–Fagales-group. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1, 321–347.Google Scholar
(1978). Blütenontogenese, Blütenabgrenzung und Systematische Stellung der perianthlosen Hamamelidoideae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 100, 249–317.Google Scholar
(1980a). Floral structure and relationships of Hortonia (Monimiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 133, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980b). Ontogeny, function and evolution of extreme floral construction in Monimiaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 134, 79–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980c). The reproductive structures and systematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 101, 393–433.Google Scholar
(1984). The role of inner staminodes in the floral display of some relic Magnoliales. Plant Syst. Evol. 146, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986). Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in Trochodendrales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73, 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Chaotic floral phyllotaxis and reduced perianth in Achlys (Berberidaceae). Bot. Acta 102, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Evolution and floral diversity, the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153, S106–S122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Diversity and Evolutionary Biology of Tropical Flowers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995a). Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. In Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, ed. , and . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 43–79.Google Scholar
(1995b). Floral structure and evolution in Ranunculanae. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9, 47–61.Google Scholar
(1997). Relationships between floral organization, architecture, and pollination mode in Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 206, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Antirrhinum and Asteridae: evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Society for Experimental Biology Symposium Series 51, 133–140Google Scholar
(1999). Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160 (6 Suppl.), S3–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001). The flower in extant basal Angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci 162, 1111–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003a). Morphology and Angiosperm systematics in the molecular era. Bot. Rev. 68, 545–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003b). Early floral development and nature of the calyptra in Eupomatiaceae (Magnoliales). Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Angiosperm floral evolution, morphological developmental framework. Adv. Bot. Res. 44, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008a). My favourite flowering image. J. Exper. Bot. FNL 2008, 1–3.
(2008b). The whole and the parts, relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 95, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008c). Perianth biology in the basal grade of extant angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 844–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Floral phyllotaxis in basal Angiosperms, development and evolution. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2009). Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. Am. J. Bot. 96, 22–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1989). The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns among Magnoliidae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100, 45–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the Laurales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125, 93–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000a). Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S211–S223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000b). The reproductive structures of the basal Angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S237–S248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1983). Convergent elaboration of apocarpous gynoecia in higher advanced dicotyledons. Nord. J. Bot. 3, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Heterodichogamy of a novel type in Hernandia (Hernandiaceae) and its structural basis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006a). First steps towards a floral structural characterization of the major rosid subclades. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 223–251.Google Scholar
and (2006b). Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots, diversity, function, and evolution. Org. Div. Evol. 6, 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1935). Loranthaceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 16b, ed. , and , 2nd edn. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 98–203.Google Scholar
and , eds. (1887–1909). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien I–IV. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
(1986). Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der spiraligen Blüte von Stewartia pseudocamellia (Theaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106, 391–407.Google Scholar
(1992). Floral development of two species of Stylidium (Stylidiaceae) and some remarks on the systematic position of the family Stylidiaceae. Can. J. Bot. 70, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Studies on the floral development and pollen presentation in Acicarpha tribuloides with a discussion of the systematic position of the family Calyceraceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115, 325–350.Google Scholar
(1994). Contributions to the affinities of Adoxa from the viewpoint of floral development. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116, 259–282.Google Scholar
(1998). Coenokarpie ohne und mit Compitum, ein Vergleich der Gynoeceen von Nigella (Ranunculaceae) and Geranium (Geraniaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 71, 13–39.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Development and interpretation of nectary organs in Ranunculaceae. Flora 194, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983). Zur Sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103, 433–449.Google Scholar
and (1985). Studien zur Organsequenz in Apiaceen-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 105, 379–400.Google Scholar
and (1988a). Blütenentwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Aralia und Hedera (Araliaceae). Flora 180, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1988b). Studien zur Blütenentwicklung und Pollenpräsentation bei Brunonia australis Smith (Brunoniaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 110, 263–282Google Scholar
and (1989). On the early floral development and the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in Campanula, Jasione and Lobelia. Bot. Jarhb. Syst. 111, 29–55.Google Scholar
and (1994). Flowers in Magnoliidae and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of the Angiosperms I. The relationships between flowers of Magnoliidae and Alismatidae. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 8, 193–208.Google Scholar
and (1995a). An analysis of the early floral development of Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) Aiton and some remarks on the systematic position of the family Pittosporaceae. Feddes Repert. 106, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995b). Portioned pollen release and the syndromes of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales–Asterales complex. Flora 190, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). Different patterns of floral development in whorled flowers, exemplified by Apiaceae and Brassicaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158 (6 Suppl.), S49–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). Floral morphology and systematics of Platystemon and its allies Hesperomecon and Meconella (Papaveraceae, Platystemonoideae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 47, 25–70.Google Scholar
and (1996). North American black-fruited hawthorns II. Floral development of 10- and 20-stamen morphotypes in Crateaegus section douglasii (Rosaceae, Maloideae). Am. J. Bot. 83, 961–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Floral ontogeny and morphology in Gillenia (‘Spiraeoideae’) and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). Reproductive structures and evolution in Ludwigia (Onagraceae) I. androecium, placentation, merism. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64, 644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). Floral structure and evolution in Lopezieae (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 60, 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Floral biology of Commelinaceae. In Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, ed. and . Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 309–317.Google Scholar
, and (1997). Taxonomic affinities of Medusagyne oppositifolia (Medusagynaceae). Kew Bull. 52, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983). Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173, 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1908). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Portulacaceen und Basellaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 42, Beibl. 97, 1–28Google Scholar
, , and (2001). Nectaries and reproductive biology of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of wind pollination in the Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1956). Studien über die natürliche Verwandtschaft der Plumbaginales und Centrospermae. Phyton (Austria) 6, 220–263.Google Scholar
(1984). Preliminary Report of Upper Cretaceous Angiosperm reproductive organs from Sweden and their level of organisation. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Cretaceous Angiosperm flowers, innovation and evolution in plant reproduction. Paleogeogr. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol. 232, 251–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Normapolles plants, a prominent component of the Cretaceous rosid diversification. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 107–140.Google Scholar
and (1993). Pattern analysis in the inflorescence of Dalechampsia L. (Euphorbiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115, 27–44.Google Scholar
, and (1986). Floral anatomy of the mangrove genus Lumnizera (Combretaceae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 37, 69–81.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Floral development of dioecious staghorn sumac, Rhus hirta (Anacardiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). Untersuchungen zur Blütenentwicklung der Polygonaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 98, 449–489.Google Scholar
and (1983). A note on the androecium of the genus Croton and flowers in general of the family Euphorbiaceae. Phytologia 54, 6–8.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Tylerianthus crossmanensis gen. et sp. nov. (Aff. Hydrageaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous of New Jersey. Am. J. Bot. 85, 376–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1963). L'anatomie de la fleur staminée de l'Hillebrandia sandwicensis Oliver et la vascularisation de l'étamine. Phytomorphology 13, 115–127.Google Scholar
, and (2007). Ontogeny of the fertile flower in Platycrater arguta (Hydrangeaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 835–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1929). Zur Morphologie der Blüten von Polygonum. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 78, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte an Blüten der Saxifragales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Androeceum. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87, 253–303.Google Scholar
(1982). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Mimosaceen-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103, 185–210.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2006). Petaloidy and petal identity MADS-box genes in the balsaminoid genera Impatiens and Marcgravia. The Plant Journal 47, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2007). Understanding Flowers and Flowering: An Integrated Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Intraindividual variation of flowers in Gunnera subgenus Panke (Gunneraceae) and proposed apomorphies for Gunnerales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 160, 262–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000a). Perianth development and systematics of Aristolochia. Flora 195, 370–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000b). Gynostemium development in Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122, 249–291Google Scholar
(2004). Floral ontogeny in Bourreria (Ehretiaceae, Boraginales). Flora 199, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975). Tafelwerk zur Pflanzensystematik mit Euartiger Bildmethode. Munich: J. F. Lehmanns Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). Some observations on the floral vascular antomy of Impatiens (Studies in Balsaminaceae VI). Kew Bull. 35, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007). Floral ontogeny of the Afro-Madagascan genus Mitrasacmopsis with comments on the development of superior ovaries in Rubiaceae. Ann. Bot. 100, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1995). Petal venation in Asterales and related orders. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Floral morphology and relationships of Clusia gundlachii with a discussion of floral organ identity and diversity in the genus Clusia. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999). Inferior ovaries and Angiosperm diversification. In Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution, ed. , and . London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 403–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Evolution of morphological diversity and resin secretion in flowers of Clusia (Clusiaceae), insights from ITS sequence variation. Nord. J. Bot. 22, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Phylogeny of Clusiaceae based on rbcL sequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 1045–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). Morphologische, anatomische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Blüten und Früchten hochsukkulenter Mesembryanthemaceen-Gattungen – ein Beitrag zu ihrer Systematik. Diss. Bot. 33, 1–256.Google Scholar
(1966). The comparative anatomy and morphology of the flowers and inflorescences of the Proteaceae III. Some African taxa. Phytomorphology 16, 490–527.Google Scholar
, and (2002). Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1826–1842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2004). Floral organogenesis in Plowmanianthus (Commelinaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000a). Development of the gametophytes, flower, and floral vasculature in Cochliostema odoratissimum (Commelinaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134, 131–157.Google Scholar
and (2000b). Floral organogenesis in some species of Tradescantia and Callisia (Commelinaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Inflorescence and floral ontogeny in Asteraceae, a synthesis of historical and current concepts. Bot. Rev. 61, 94–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Floral development of Nelumbo nucifera Nelumbonaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S183–S191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1964). Das zentrifugale Androeceum der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 77, 427–435.Google Scholar
(1965). Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 84, 359–508Google Scholar
(1966). Zur Morphologie, Anatomie und Funktion des Diskus der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 79, 233–245.Google Scholar
, and (2003). Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100, 12 814–12 819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1984). Wachstum und Ausbildungsformen des Gynoeceums von Rochelia (Boraginaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 146, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1973). Centrospermen-Studien 6, Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Umgrenzung und Gliederung der Aizoaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93, 247–324.Google Scholar
(1993). Flower morphology and ontogeny. In Caryophyllales: Evolution and Systematics, ed. and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 123–166.Google Scholar
and (1990). Morina L. und Triplostegia Wall. ex DC. im Vergleich mit Valerianaceae und Dipsacaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 111, 499–553.Google Scholar
(2007). Dilleniaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IX, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 132–154.Google Scholar
and (2005). Duplications in cyc-like genes from Dipsacales correlate with floral form. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989a). Structure of the inflorescence and flower of Petalonix linearis (Loasaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 163, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989b). The structure and potential loasaceous affinities of Schismocarpus. Nord. J. Bot. 9, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Can. J. Bot. 68, 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992a). Rosidae and their relationships to other non-magnoliid Dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79, 218–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b). Floral structure of Besseya and Synthyris (Scrophulariaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 153, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Patterns of ontogenetic evolution in perianth diversification of Besseya (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82, 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Early development of androecia in polystemonous Hydrangeaceae. Am. J. Bot. 85, 1057–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001). Ontogeny and morphology of the fertile flowers of Hydrangea and allied genera of tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 137, 139–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Homology and developmental transformation, models for the origins of the staminodes of Loasaceae subfamily Loasoideae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S409–S439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1994). Gynoecial development of Gaertnera Lam. and of presumably allied taxa of the Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae), secondarily ‘superior’ vs. inferior ovaries. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116, 401–414.Google Scholar
(1960). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Mesembryanthemen. Feddes Repert. 63, 1–104.Google Scholar
, and (1989). An analysis of the development of single and double flowers in Potentilla fruticosa. Can. J. Bot. 67, 1071–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986a). Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales III. Floral anatomy of Brasenia schreberi Gmel. and Cabomba caroliniana A. Gray. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 99, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986b). Studies in the floral morphology and antomy of Nymphaeales IV. Floral anatomy of Nelumbo nucifera. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 37, 82–96.Google Scholar
, and (2008). Evolutionary trends in the flowers of Asteridae: is polyandry an alternative to zygomorphy?Ann. Bot. 102, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966). Infloreszenz- und blütenmorphologische, sowie embryologische Untersuchungen an Myothamnus Welw. Beitr. Biol. Plflanz. 42, 241–271.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2008). Structure, development and evolution of the androecium in Adansonieae (core Bombacoideae, Malvaceae s.l.). Plant Syst. Evol. 275, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2007). Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 19 369–19 374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004). APETALA3 and PISTILLATA homologs exhibit novel expression patterns in the unique perianth of Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Evol. Devel. 6, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Phylogeny and patterns of floral diversity in the genus Piper (Piperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88, 706–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). Phylogenetic relationships of the perianthless Piperales, reconstructing the evolution of floral development. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Different gynoecium types in Sterculiaceae: ontogeny and functional aspects. In Aspects of Floral Development, ed. , and . Berlin: J. Cramer, pp. 225–236.Google Scholar
, , , and (2002). Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
and (2004). A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1627–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1994). Angiosperm family pairs, preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap. Bot. 5, 1–51.Google Scholar
, and (2000). Generic realignment in primuloid families of the Ericales s.l.: a phylogenetic analysis based on DNA sequences from three chloroplast genes and morphology. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1325–1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1973). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Rosaceenblüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93, 175–246.Google Scholar
(1991). Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. University of Zürich, Switzerland: unpubl. thesis.Google Scholar
(1968). Floral morphology and phylogeny in the Hydrocharitaceae. Phytomorphology 18, 13–35.Google Scholar
(1993). Menispermaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 402–418.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2005). Expression of floral MADS-box genes in basal Angiosperms: implications for the evolution of floral regulators. The Plant Journal 43, 724–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1983). Floral organogenesis in five genera of the Marataceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Am. J. Bot. 70, 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Inflorescence and flower development in Costus scaber (Costaceae). Can. J. Bot. 62, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Ovary structure and anatomy in the Heliconiaceae and Musaceae (Zingiberales). Can. J. Bot. 70, 2490–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae), Hedychium. Can. J. Bot. 75, 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Hofmeister's rule and primordium shape, influences on organ position in Hedychium coronarium (Zingiberaceae). In Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, ed. and . Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
(1973). Florale Morphogenese und Taxonomie der Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Feddes Repert. 84, 475–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Floral diversity and evolution in the Solanaceae. In Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, ed. , and . London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 267–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001a). Floral structure and development and systematic aspects of some ‘lower’ Asparagales. Plant Syst. Evol. 229, 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001b). Floral structure and development of Apostasia and Neuwiedia (Apostasioideae) and their relationships to other Orchidaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Simmondsiaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, eds. and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 355–358.Google Scholar
, and (2003). Complex patterns of gene duplication in the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA lineages of the Ranunculaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). A simplified explanation for the frameshift mutation that created a novel C-terminal motif in the APETALA3 gene lineage. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990). Phylogeny and classification of Zingiberales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 77, 698–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2002). A phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Bot. Rev. 68, 335–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Patterns of anomalous floral development in the Asian Passiflora (subgenus Decaloba, supersection Disemma). Am. J. Bot. 93, 620–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1988). Floral ontogeny of Securidaca longepedunculata Fresen (Polygalaceae) including inflorescence morphology. In Aspects of Floral Development, ed. , and . Berlin: J. Cramer., pp. 159–167.Google Scholar
(1993). Hernandiaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 334–338.Google Scholar
(2004). Introduction. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
(2007a). Berberidopsidaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IX, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 33–35.Google Scholar
(2007b). Haloragaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IX, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 184–190.Google Scholar
, and (2001). Structural homology and developmental transformations associated with ovary diversification in Lithophragma (Saxifragaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (2003). Phylogeny and character evolution in Polygonaceae. Syst. Bot. 21, 17–29.Google Scholar
(1937). Studies in the anatomy and morphology of the Polygonaceous flower. Am. J. Bot. 24, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1992). Irregular floral development in Calla palustris (Araceae) and the concept of homeosis. Am. J. Bot. 79, 1145–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1993). Homeosis in floral development of Sanguinaria canadensis and S. canadensis ‘Multiplex’ (Papaveraceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 1323–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1994). Floral development and homeosis in Actaea rubra (Ranunculaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 155, 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1998. Floral development of dioecious species and trends of floral evolution in Piper sensu lato. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127, 225–237Google Scholar
(1964a). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Ericales-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 83, 57–88.Google Scholar
(1964b). Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Hypericum hookerianum Wight et Arn. und H. aegypticum L. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 77, 112–123.Google Scholar
(1965). Die Infloreszenz und Frühe Blütenentwicklung von Melaleuca nesophila F. Muell. (Myrtaceae). Planta 65, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). Die frühe Blütenentwicklung von Aegle marmelos (Rutaceae). Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 80, 320–325Google Scholar
and (1985). Ein Beitrag zur Blütenentwicklung der Aristolochiaceen, einer Vermittlergruppe zu den Monokotylen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107, 343–368.Google Scholar
and (1987). Studien zur Blütenentwicklung an Compositen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108, 381–401.Google Scholar
and (1988). Einige Bemerkungen zur Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Wasserpflanzen Callitriche, Hippuris und Hydrostachys. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 63, 157–178.Google Scholar
and (1989). Zur Blütenentwicklung und sekundären Pollenpräsentation bei Selliera radicans. Cav. (Goodeniaceae). Flora 182, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). Fascicled androecia in Dilleniidae and some remarks on the Garcinia androecium. Bot. Acta 104, 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Das frühe Differenzierungsmuster in den Blüten von Saruma henryi Oliv. (Aristolochiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117, 365–376.Google Scholar
and (1996). Early floral developmental studies in Annonaceae. In Reproductive Morphology in Annonaceae, ed. and . Vienna: Akademie der Wissenschaften, Biosystematics and Ecology Series 10, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
and (2000). Die frühesten Entwicklungsstadien der Blüten bei den Asteraceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122, 503–515.Google Scholar
and (2007). Blüte und Frucht, 2nd edn. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
, and (1988). Note on the floral development of Thottea (Aristolochiaceae). Blumea 33, 357–370.Google Scholar
and (1971). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Cucurbitaceen-Blüten. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 119, 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985). Studien an Cactaceen-Blüten I. Einige Bermerkungen zur Blütenentwicklung von Pereskia. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 60, 313–323.Google Scholar
and (1973). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen am Androecium der Alismatales. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 122, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceenblüten. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 122, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1955). Sur la position des étamines chez quelques Echium. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 90, 369–372.Google Scholar
. and (1999). Floral development and the formation of unisexual spikelets in the Andropogoneae (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86, 354–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1949). The floral morphology of some South African members of Polygalaceae. J. S. Afr. Bot. 15, 79–92.Google Scholar
and (2000). Heterochrony in plant evolutionary studies through the twentieth century. Bot. Rev. 66, 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999a). Polyandry in Rosaceae: evidence for a spiral origin of the androecium in Spiraeoideae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121, 553–582.Google Scholar
and (1999b). The spiraeoid androecium of Pyroideae and Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121, 583–605.Google Scholar
and (2000). Structural and developmental diversity of the androecium of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122, 63–91.Google Scholar
(1991). A review of the southern African Restionaceae. Contr. Bolus Herb. 13, 209–264.Google Scholar
(1992a). The gynoecia of Australian Restionaceae, morphology, anatomy and systematic implications. Aust. Syst. Bot. 5, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992b). The structure and evolution of the pistillate flower of the African Restionaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 109, 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. In Reproductive Biology in Systematics, Conservation and Economic Botany, ed. and . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
and (2005). Evolutionary history of Poales. Annu. Rev. Evol. Syst. 36, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003a). Floral development and morphology of Vochysiaceae I. The structure of the gynoecium. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1533–1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003b). Floral development and morphology of Vochysiaceae II. The position of the single fertile stamen. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1548–1559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1985). A monograph of the Monimiaceae (Laurales) in the Malagasy region (Southwest Indian Ocean). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 72, 1–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1907). Systematische Untersuchungen über die Caryophyllaceen mit einfachem Diagramm. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 40, Beibl. 91, 1–37.Google Scholar
, , , and (1996). Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383, 794–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2003). Comparative floral ontogeny of Maesa (Maesaceae), Aegiceras (Myrsinaceae) and Embelia (Myrsinaceae), taxonomic and phylogenetic implications. Plant Syst. Evol. 243, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Arthur Harry Church: The Anatomy of Flowers. London: The Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
(1908). Nepenthaceae. In Das Pflanzenreich IV, 3, ed. . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar
(2007). From fossils to molecules, phylogeny and the core eudicot floral groundplan in Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae, Saxifragales). Syst. Bot. 32, 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Olacaceae and related Santalales. Syst. Bot. 33, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Patterns and development of floral asymmetry in Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). Am. J. Bot. 95, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast DNA regions: patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectaries. Am. J. Bot. 93, 288–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Comparative floral structure and systematics in Oxalidales (Oxalidaceae, Connaraceae, Brunelliaceae, Cephalotaceae, Cunoniaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Tremandraceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 321–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Comparative floral structure and systematics in Cucurbitales (Corynocarpaceae, Coriariaceae, Tetramelaceae, Datiscaceae, Begoniaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Anisophylleaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145, 129–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 149, 129–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Comparative floral struture and systematics in Chrysobalanaceae s.l. (Chrysobalanaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Euphroniaceae, Trigoniaceae; Malpighiales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 157, 249–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Calceolariaceae: floral development and systematic implications. Am. J. Bot. 93, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and 1992. Comparative flower and fruit morphogenesis in Colubrina (Rhamnaceae) with special reference to C. asiatica. Am. J. Bot. 79, 809–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1925). Violaceae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien XXI, 2nd edn, ed. and . Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 329–377.Google Scholar
(1984). The affinity of Paeonia and a second genus of Paeoniaceae. Kew Bull. 38, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2006). Phylogeny and evolution of Burmanniaceae (Dioscoreales) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data. Am. J. Bot. 93, 1684–1698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). Female flowers and systematic position of Picodendraceae (Euphorbiaceae s.l., Malpighiales). Plant Syst. Evol. 261, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1924). Blütenmorphologische Untersuchungen an den Euphorbiaceen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenie der Angiospermenblüte. Goebel Bot. Abhandl. 3, 1–150.Google Scholar
(1980). Studies in the floral anatomy of Claytonia. Am. J. Bot. 67, 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990). Comparative ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower of Hamamelis virginiana and Loropetalum chinense (Hamamelidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 77, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). The evolution of unisexual flowers: morphological and functional convergence results from diverse developmental transitions. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1988). Floral Development of Tropical and Subtropical Fruit and Nut Species: An Atlas of Scanning Electron Micrographs. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
and (2008). MADS about the evolution of orchid flowers. Tr. Plant Sci. 13, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2000a). Floral development and structure of Davidsonia (Cunoniaceae). Can. J. Bot. 78, 1034–1043.Google Scholar
and (2000b). Floral ontogeny and morphology of Cevallia, Fuertesia, and Gronovia (Loasaceae subfamily Gronovioideae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 869–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1997). Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 19 363–19 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993). Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80, 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2001). Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Crassulaceae inferred from matK sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 88, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). Comparative floral anatomy of Strobilanthinae (Acanthaceae), with particular reference to internal partitioning of the flower. Plant Syst. Evol. 249, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1912). Üntersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Papaveraceen. Kungl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl. 50, 1–168.Google Scholar
and (1962). Floral morphology of a few species of Euphorbiaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B,56, 1–12.Google Scholar
(1998). Floral development and systematics of Cistaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 212, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1969). Contributions to the floral anatomy of Linaceae 1. J. Jap. Bot. 44, 289–294.Google Scholar
and (1973). Contributions to the floral anatomy of Linaceae 5. J. Jap. Bot. 48, 205–208.Google Scholar
and (1976). Contributions to the floral anatomy of Linaceae 6. J. Jap. Bot. 51, 92–96.Google Scholar
and (1978). Contributions to the floral anatomy of Linaceae 11. J. Jap. Bot. 53, 12–14.Google Scholar
(1958a). Morphological and embryological studies in the family Loranthaceae II. Lysiana exocarpi (Behr.) van Tieghem. Phytomorphology 8, 147–168.Google Scholar
(1958b). Morphological and embryological studies in the family Loranthaceae III. Nuytsia floribunda (Labill.) R. Br. Phytomorphology 8, 306–323.Google Scholar
and (2008). A comparative study of shoot and floral development in Paris tetraphylla and P. verticillata (Trilliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 272, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). The relationship of the Sapotaceae within the Ebenales. In The Genera of Sapotaceae, ed. . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Garden and Bronx, NY: New York Botanic Garden, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
and (1994). A consensus classification for the order Gentianales with additional details on the suborder Apocynineae. Bot. Rev. 60, 440–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). A molecular phylogeny of Santalales. In Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, ed. , , , , and . Nantes: Faculté des Sciences, Université de Nantes, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
(1897). Malpighiaceae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III, 4, 1st edn., ed. and . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
(1925). Frankeniaceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien II, 1, 2nd edn., ed. and . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 276–281.Google Scholar
(1983a). Corolla tube formation in the Tubiflorae and Gentianales. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 96: 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983b). Corolla tube formation in the Primulales and Ericales. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 96: 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Early floral organogenesis in Tripetaleia (Ericaceae). In Aspects of Floral Development, ed. , and . Berlin: J. Cramer, pp. 181–190.Google Scholar
(1993). Magnoliaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 391–401.Google Scholar
and (2008). Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon 57, 434–451.Google Scholar
(1983). Floral development of Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 34, 10–17.Google Scholar
, and (1992). Pistil development and parietal placentation in the pseudomomerous ovary of Zelkova serrata (Ulmaceae). Am. J. Bot. 79, 921–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2001). Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Am. J. Bot. 88, 348–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Ontogenetic origins of floral bilateral symmetry in Moringaceae (Brassicales). Am. J. Bot. 90, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996). Floral development in the Metrosideros group (Myrtaceae) with special emphasis on the androecium. Telopea 6, 689–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999). Floral development in Melaleuca and Callistemon (Myrtaceae). Aust. Syst. Bot. 11, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Floral ontogeny of Telipogon spp. (Orchidaceae) and insights on the perianth symmetry in the family. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 1159–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Plant Syst. Evol. 238, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Nzayilu N'ti: Guide des Arbres et Arbustes de la Région de Kinshasa-Brazzaville. Meise: Jardin Botanique National de Belgique.Google Scholar
and (1978). l'Androcée centripète d'Ochna atropurpurea. Can. J. Bot. 56, 2500–2511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Sapotaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 390–421.Google Scholar
(1970). Constant and variable features of the Araliaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63 (Suppl. 1), 87–100.Google Scholar
(1993). Monimiaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 426–437.Google Scholar
(1935). Santalaceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 16b, ed. . and . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 52–91.Google Scholar
(2002). Bloemontogenetische studie van de Rosaceae, Dipsacaceae en Malvaceae met bijzondere aandacht voor de bijkelk. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium: unpubl. thesis.Google Scholar
(2001). Relationship of the order Apiales to subclass Asteridae: a re-evaluation of morphological characters based on insights from molecular data. Edinburgh J. Bot. 58, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996). Higher level relationships of Apiales (Apiaceae and Araliaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences. Am. J. Bot. 83, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Lecythidaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 221–232.Google Scholar
(2004a). New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Ann. Bot. 93, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004b). Floral development in Polygala myrtifolia (Polygalaceae) and its similarities with Leguminosae. Plant Syst. Evol. 249, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004c). Floral ontogeny in Calliandra angustifolia (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae, Ingeae) and its systematic implications. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Towards unlocking the deep nodes of Leguminosae: floral development and morphology of the enigmatic Duparquetia orchidacea (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Am. J. Bot. 95: 1349–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies, exploring the organ-flower-inflorescence boundary. Am. J. Bot. 94, 1612–1629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2008). The branching stamens of Ricinus and the homologies of the Angiosperm stamen fascicle. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). The flowers of Paederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae). Opera Bot. Belg. 3, 55–75.Google Scholar
(2007). Multiplications of floral parts in the genus Conostegia (Melastomataceae). Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: unpubl. MSc thesis.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (1999). The earliest Angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1991a). Floral anatomy of Hypseocharis (Oxalidaceae) with a discussion on its systematic position. Plant Syst. Evol. 177, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991b). Floral anatomy of six species of Impatiens. Feddes Repert. 102, 395–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990). Comparative ontogeny of the perianth in Mimosoid legumes. Am. J. Bot. 77, 624–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1953). The floral anatomy of some bicarpellatae 1. Acanthaceae. J. Univ. Bombay 21, 1–34.Google Scholar
(1974). The nature of the perianth in Eleagnus on the basis of floral anatomy with some comments on the systematic position of Eleagnaceae. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 53, 156–161.Google Scholar
, and (1954). The floral anatomy of some Scitamineae I. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 33, 118–147.Google Scholar
, and (2009). One size fits all? Molecular evidence for a commonly inherited petal identity program in Ranunculales. Am. J. Bot. 96, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998). Evolution of novel morphological and reproductive traits in a clade containing Antirrhinum majus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85, 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Inflorescence, spikelet, and floral development in Panicum maximum and Urochloa plantaginea (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Inflorescence and floral morphology in Tofieldia (Tofieldiaceae) compared with Araceae, Acoraceae and Alismatales s.str. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 124, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). Floral evolution in the monocot family Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales), evidence from anatomy and development in Metanarthecium luteo-viride Maxim. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 158, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Evolution of the monocot gynoecium, evidence from comparative morphology and development in Tofieldia, Japanolirion, Petrosavia and Narthecium. Plant Syst. Evol. 258, 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales, evidence from molecular and morphological data. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1301–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1969). Morphological studies of the Nymphaceae IV. Structure and development of the flower of Brasenia schreberi Gmel. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 47, 1–101.Google Scholar
, , , and (2000). A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using RbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1309–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1998). Parallel evolution of glucosinolate biosynthesis inferred from congruent nuclear and plastid gene phylogenies. Am. J. Bot. 85, 997–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1997). A floral ontogenetic investigation of the Hydrangeaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 17, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994). A comparative floral ontogenetical study between Adoxa moschatellina and Sambucus ebulus. Belg. J. Bot. 127, 157–170.Google Scholar
and (1996). A floral ontogenetic study in the Dipsacales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994). Floral morphology of Maloideae (Rosaceae) and its systematic relevance. Am. J. Bot. 81, 574–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1965). Centrospermen-Studien 2. Entwicklung und morphologische Deutung des Gynöciums bei Phytolacca. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 84, 509–526.Google Scholar
and (1974). Centrospermen-Studien 7. Beobachtungen und Anmerkungen zur Morphologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger Nyctaginaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 94, 327–359.Google Scholar
(1993a). Lauraceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 366–391.Google Scholar
(1993b). Phytolaccaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 506–515.Google Scholar
(1988). Two types of ringwall formation in the development of complex polyandry. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg. 121, 122–124.Google Scholar
(1989a). The flower of Koenigia islandica L. (Polygonaceae), an interpretation. Watsonia 17, 419–423.Google Scholar
(1989b). The floral development of Cochlospermum tinctorium and Bixa orellana with special emphasis on the androecium. Am. J. Bot. 76, 1344–1359.Google Scholar
(1990). Morphological studies in Tamaricales I. Floral ontogeny and anatomy of Reaumuria vermiculata L. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 65, 181–203.Google Scholar
(2002). Floral development and anatomy of Pentadiplandra (Pentadiplandraceae): a key genus in the identification of floral morphological trends in the core Brassicales. Can. J. Bot. 80, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). The evolutionary significance of homeosis in flowers, a morphological perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S225–S235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Floral development of Berberidopsis corallina: a crucial link in the evolution of flowers in the core eudicots. Ann. Bot. 94, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2005). Floral developmental evidence for the systematic position of Batis (Bataceae). Am. J. Bot. 92, 752–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Are petals sterile stamens or bracts? The origin and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Ann. Bot. 100, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2008). Homology and evolution of petals in the core eudicots. Syst. Bot. 33, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1988). Generic limits in Polygonum and related genera (Polygonaceae) on the basis of floral characters. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 321–371.Google Scholar
, and (1993). Stamen-petal complexes in Magnoliatae. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 62, 97–112.Google Scholar
, and (1996). Morphological studies in Zygophyllaceae II. The floral development and vascular anatomy of Peganum harmala. Am. J. Bot. 83, 201–215.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Floral development and anatomy of Moringa oleifera (Moringaceae): what is the evidence for a capparalean or sapindalean affinity?Ann. Bot. 82, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). The systematic relationships of glucosinolate-producing plants and related families: a cladistic investigation based on morphological and molecular characters. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 151, 453–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004). What is the taxonomic status of Polygonella? Evidence from floral morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 91, 320–345.Google Scholar
, , and (2001). Evolution and development of floral diversity of Melianthaceae, an enigmatic Southern African family. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). The questionable relationship of Montinia (Montiniaceae): evidence from a floral ontogenetic and anatomical study. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1408–1424.Google Scholar
, and (2001). Floral ontogenetic evidence in support of the Willdenowia clade of South African Restionaceae. J. Plant Res. 114, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Ontogeny and evolution of the flower of South African Restionaceae with special emphasis on the gynoecium. Plant Syst. Evol. 231, 225–258.Google Scholar
and (2004). Floral development and anatomy of Dirachma socotrana (Dirachmaceae), a controversial member of the Rosales. Plant Syst. Evol. 249, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987). The distribution and the systematic relevance of the androecial characters Oligomery and Polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nord. J. Bot. 7, 239–253.Google Scholar
, and (1990a). The floral development of Popowia whitei (Annonaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 10, 411–420. [Correction in Nord. J. Bot. 11 (1991), 420.]Google Scholar
and (1990b). The systematic relationship between Begoniaceae and Papaveraceae, a comparative study of their floral development. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 60, 229–273.Google Scholar
and (1991a). The impact of receptacular growth on polyandry in the Myrtales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 257–269.Google Scholar
and (1991b). The floral nectaries of Polygonum s.l. and related genera (Persicarieae and Polygoneae), position, morphological nature and semophylesis. Flora 185, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991c). The floral ontogeny of some members of the Phytolaccaceae (subfamily Rivinoideae) with a discussion of the evolution of the androecium in the Rivinoideae. Biol. Jahrb. Dodonaea 59, 77–99.Google Scholar
and (1991d). Androecium and floral nectaries of Harungana madagascariensis (Clusiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 178, 179–194.Google Scholar
and (1991e). Morphological studies in Zygophyllaceae I. The floral development and vascular anatomy of Nitraria retusa. Am. J. Bot. 78, 1438–1448.Google Scholar
and (1992a). Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae, definition, distribution and systematic value. Nord. J. Bot. 12, 621–649.Google Scholar
and (1992b). An updated interpretation of the androecium of the Fumariaceae. Can. J. Bot. 70, 1765–1776.Google Scholar
and (1993). The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character polymery. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 285–350.Google Scholar
and (1994). Merosity, definition, origin and taxonomic significance. Plant Syst. Evol. 191, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995a). The androecium of monocotyledons. In Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, ed. , , , and . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
and (1995b). The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 193–247.Google Scholar
and (1995c). Evolution of the androecium in the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9, 63–70.Google Scholar
and (1996a). The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. Feddes Repert. 107, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996b). The floral development of Neurada procumbens L. (Neuradaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 45, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997a). A floral ontogenetic study of some species of Capparis and Boscia, with special emphasis on the androecium. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 119, 231–255.Google Scholar
and (1997b). Evidence for carpel multiplications in the Capparaceae. Belg. J. Bot. 130, 59–67.Google Scholar
and (1998a). Notes on the evolution of androecial organisation in the Magnoliophytina (Angiosperms). Bot. Acta 111, 77–86.Google Scholar
and (1998b). Meristic changes in gynoecium morphology, exemplified by floral ontogeny and anatomy. In Reproductive Biology in Systematics, Conservation and Economic Botany, ed. and . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
and (1999a). The floral development and anatomy of Carica papaya (Caricaceae). Can. J. Bot. 77, 582–598.Google Scholar
and (1999b). Similarities in floral ontogeny and anatomy between the genera Francoa (Francoaceae) and Greyia (Greyiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Floral development of Galopina tomentosa with a discussion of sympetaly and placentation in the Rubiaceae. Syst. Geogr. Plants 70, 155–170.Google Scholar
and (2001a). Staminodes: their morphological and evolutionary significance. Bot. Rev. 67, 351–402.Google Scholar
, and (2001b). Floral developmental evidence for the systematic relationships of Tropaeolum (Tropaeolaceae). Ann. Bot. 88, 879–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995). The floral development and floral anatomy of Coris monspeliensis. Can. J. Bot. 73, 1687–1698.Google Scholar
, and (2000). Floral ontogeny and anatomy in Koelreuteria with special emphasis on monosymmetry and septal cavities. Plant Syst. Evol. 223, 91–107.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Pseudodiplostemony, and its implications for the evolution of the androecium in the Caryophyllaceae. J. Plant Res. 111, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Evolution of floral structures in basal Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S329–S363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). A study of the floral morphological diversity in Phytolacca (Phytolaccaceae) based on early floral ontogeny. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158, 56–72.Google Scholar
and (1999). The floral development of Pleuropetalum darwinii, an anomalous member of the Amaranthaceae. Flora 194, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Floral anatomy and systematics of Bretschneidera (Bretschneideraceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 139, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Evolution of floral characters in Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Syst. Bot. 31, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Morphology and anatomy of the flower of Meliosma (Sabiaceae), implications for pollination biology. Plant Syst. Evol. 271, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Floral development and anatomy of Salvadoraceae. Ann. Bot. 104, 913–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1982). Initiation of stamens, carpels and receptacle in the Cactaceae. Am. J. Bot. 69, 369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectaries in monocotyledons. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Monocot pseudanthia revisited, floral structure of the mycoheterotrophic family Triuridaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S307–S320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Evolutionary change in flowers and inflorescences, evidence from naturally occurring terata. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004). Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers, iterative patterns and developmental constraints. New Phytol. 162, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Floral anatomy and systematics of Alliaceae with particular reference to Gilliesia, a presumed insect mimic with strongly zygomorphic flowers. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1867–1883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2007). Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent Angiosperm lineage. Am. J. Bot. 94, 1073–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (2005). Evolution of reproductive structures in grasses (Poaceae) inferred by sister-group comparison with their putative closest living relatives, Ecdeiocoleaceae. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1432–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1998). Theligonum cynocrambe, developmental morphology of a peculiar rubiaceous herb. Plant Syst. Evol. 210, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Floral development and embryology in the early-divergent grass Pharus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). Reproductive morphology of the early-divergent grass Streptochaeta and its bearing on the homologies of the grass spikelet. Plant Syst. Evol. 275, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). Studies on the Monimiaceae II. Floral morphology of Laurelia novae-zelandiae A.Cunn. (Subfamily Atherospermoideae). New Zeal. J. Bot. 7, 214–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Phylogenetics of Polygonaceae with an emphasis on the evolution of Eriogonoideae. Syst. Bot. 33, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962). Zur frühen Infloreszenz und Blütenentwicklung der Primulales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stamen-Petalum-Entwicklung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 81, 385–396Google Scholar
(1973). Organogenesis of Flowers: A Photographic Text-Atlas. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
(1977). Kronröhrenentstehung bei Solanum dulcamara L. und ‘kongenitale Verwachsung’. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 90, 29–38.Google Scholar
(1978). ‘Fusion’ and ‘Continuity’ in floral morphology. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 36, 397–405.Google Scholar
and (1982). Floral development of Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd., Boerhaavia diffusa L. and Mirabilis jalapa L. (Nyctaginaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). Floral development of Hydrocleis nymphoides. Can. J. Bot. 51, 2455–2458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977). Floral organogenesis of Limnocharis flava. Can. J. Bot. 55, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978). Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the Alismatales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1937, 1939). Floral Morphology. A New Outlook with Special Reference to the Interpretation of the Gynoecium, Vols I and II. Cambridge, UK: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar
(2003). Androecium diversity and evolution in Myristicaceae (Magnoliales), with a description of a new Malagasy genus, Doyleanthus gen. nov. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1293–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). Über die männlichen Blüten einiger Menispermaceen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 52, 207–215.Google Scholar
(1905). Halorrhagaceae. In Das Pflanzenreich IV, 225, ed. . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 1–133.Google Scholar
(1980). Comparative anatomy and morphology of Psiloxylon and Heteropyxis, and the subfamilial and tribal classification of Myrtaceae. Taxon 29, 559–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976). The floral anatomy of Victoria Schomb. (Nymphaeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 115–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Floral development in the Nymphaeales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S279–S292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1932). Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. Planta 17, 315–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Molecular phylogenetics and patterns of floral evolution in the Ericales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhychocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales). Am. J. Bot. 90, 293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). Structure and development of the flowers in Mendoncia, Pseudocalyx, and Thunbergia (Acanthaceae) and their systematic implications. Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 446–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Fossil flowers of ericalean s.l. affinity from the Late Cretaceous of southern Sweden. Am. J. Bot. 88, 467–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2001). Cunoniaceae in the Cretaceous of Europe: evidence from fossil flowers. Ann. Bot. 88, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Early floral development and androecium organization in Fouquieriaceae (Ericales). Plant Syst. Evol. 254, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Reproductive structures and phylogenetic framework of the rosids: progress and prospects. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 87–106.Google Scholar
, and (1994). Corolla ontogeny and aestivation in the Acanthaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 114, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985). Floral development of Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L. (Hydrocharitaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72, 1578–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). An unusual kind of nectary in the oil flowers of Monttea, its structure and function. Flora 194, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Celastraceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 29–64.Google Scholar
(1990). Phylogeny and classification of Haemodoraceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 77, 722–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a). Reversal in ovary position from inferior to superior in the Haemodoraceae: evidence from floral ontogeny. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 159, 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998b). Haemodoraceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IV, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 212–222.Google Scholar
and (1973). Nonspiral androecium and gynoecium of Sagittaria latifolia. Can. J. Bot. 51, 1093–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977a). Development of the inflorescence of Sagittaria cuneata. Can. J. Bot. 55, 1087–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977b). Floral development of Aponogeton natans and A. undulatus. Can. J. Bot. 55, 1106–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1935). Olacaceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 16b, ed. and . Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 5–32.Google Scholar
(1986). Localization and systematic importance of the floral nectaries in the Magnoliatae (Dicotyledons). Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 56, 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). La présence des ‘nectaria persistentia’ chez les Magnoliophytina (Angiospermes). Candollea 43, 709–716.Google Scholar
, , and (2000). Floral nectaries in monocotyledons, distribution and evolution. In Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, ed. and . Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 230–240.Google Scholar
, , and (2007). Flower structure and development in Tupidanthus calyptratus (Araliaceae), an extreme case of polymery among asterids. Plant Syst. Evol. 268, 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). Flower-like terminal structures in racemose inflorescences, a tool in morphogenetic and evolutionary research. J. Exper. Bot. 57, 3517–3530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al. (2003). Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery. Am. J. Bot. 90, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2004). The origin and diversification of Angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1614–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Botanique Systématique des Plantes à Fleurs, 2nd edn. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires Romandes.Google Scholar
(2007). Combretaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IX, ed. . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
and (2009). Diversity and lability of floral phyllotaxis in the pluricarpellate families of core Laurales (Gomortegaceae, Atherospermataceae, Siparunaceae, Monimiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 170, 522–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Floral phyllotaxis and floral architecture in Calycanthaceae (Laurales). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Comparative morphology of female flowers and systematics in Geonomeae (Arecaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 242, 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Morphology and development of the female flowers in Geonoma interrupta (Arecaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1991). Flower development in Amelanchier alnifolia (Maloideae). Can. J. Bot. 69, 844–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Embryologische, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen ausgewählter Annonaceae. Diss. Bot. 205, 1–237.Google Scholar
(2001 onwards). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008 [and more or less continuously updated since]. www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
, and (2004). Comparative floral anatomy of Pontederiaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 144, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2002). Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Gentianaceae, including a new tribal and subtribal classification. In Gentianaceae: Systematics and Natural History, ed. and . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–309.Google Scholar
(1938). Neue Ziele der Botanik: Über das Vorkommen getrennter Kronblätter bei den Sympetalen. München-Berlin, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
(1991). Scanning electron microscopy observation on early ontogeny of the flower of Camellia japonica L. J. Jap. Bot. 66, 295–299.Google Scholar
and (1995). Aspects of gynoecium structure and macrosystematics in Euphorbiaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116, 517–536.Google Scholar
(1991). The development of the bicarpellate gynoecium of Paederia L. species (Rubiaceae–Paederieae). Opera Bot. Belg. 3, 77–86.Google Scholar
(2008). Phylogeny and floral diversity in the genus Garcinia (Clusiaceae) and relatives. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 1288–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). A comparative study of floral development in Trillium apetalon and T. camtschaticum (Liliaceae). J. Plant Res. 107, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
(1983). Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae VI. Floral anatomy of Diphylleia Michx., Podophyllum L. and Dyosma Woodson. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 34, 27–47.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2002). How the land plants learned their floral ABCs, the role of MADS box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. In Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, ed. , and . London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar
(1992). An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13, 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). Vascular anatomy of the flower of certain species of the Combretaceae. Bot. Gaz. 130, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998). Floral morphology and evolution in Lythraceae sensu lato. In Reproductive Biology in Systematics, Conservation and Economic Botany, ed. and . Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 329–344.Google Scholar
(1993). Ulmaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. II, ed. , and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 603–611.Google Scholar
(2008). Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Violaceae (Malpighiales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. J. Plant Res. 121, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2006). Phylogenetic analyses of Malpighiales using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, with particular reference to the embryology of Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto. J. Plant Res. 119, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Der Aussenkelch der Rosaceen. In Symposium Morphologie, Anatomie und Systematik, Zusammenfassungen der Vorträge, Vol. 9, ed. , and . Vienna: Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, p. 66.Google Scholar
(1956). Die Urbildlichkeit der organischen Gestaltung und Goethes prinzip der ‘Variablen Proportionen’Neu Hefte zur Morphologie 2, 64–76.Google Scholar
(1998). Early floral development of Camellioideae (Theaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85, 1531–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Floral organogenesis and floral evolution of the Lecythidoideae. Am. J. Bot. 94, 716–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1984). Unidirectional organ initiation in leguminous flowers. Am. J. Bot. 71, 1139–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985). Initiation and development of inflorescence and flower in Anemopsis californica (Saururaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988a). Dioecy in Bauhinia resulting from organ suppression. Am. J. Bot. 75, 1584–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988b). Loss versus suppression of floral organs. In Aspects of Floral Development, ed. , , and . Berlin: J. Cramer, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
(1992). The developmental basis for sexual expression in Ceratonia siliqua (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Cassieae). Am. J. Bot. 79, 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Trends in evolution of floral ontogeny in Cassia sensu stricto, Senna, and Chamaecrista (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Cassieae, Cassiinae): a study in convergence. Am. J. Bot. 83, 687–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Floral evolution, development, and convergence, the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158 (6 Suppl.), S143–S161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Floral ontogeny in Legume genera Petalostylis, Labichea, and Dialium (Caesalpinioideae, Cassieae), a series in floral reduction. Am. J. Bot. 85, 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999b). Evolutionary lability of symmetry in early floral development. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160 (6 Suppl.), S25–S39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2000a). Evolutionary loss of sepals and/or petals in Detarioid legume taxa (Aphanocalyx, Brachystegia, and Monopetalanthus (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Am. J. Bot. 87, 608–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b). Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae), Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1385–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000c). Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a). The ontogenetic basis for missing petals in Crudia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001b). Floral development in Schotia and Cynometra (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). Am. J. Bot. 88, 1164–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002a). Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) III. Radial symmetry and random petal aestivation in Cadia purpurea. Am. J. Bot. 89, 748–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002b). Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) II. zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. Am. J. Bot. 89, 888–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003b). Floral ontogeny in Swartzia (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Swartzieae): distribution and role of the ring meristem. Am. J. Bot. 90, 1274–1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. and (2000). Floral ontogeny, pattern formation, and evolution in Hibbertia and Adrastea (Dilleniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87, 1915–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1996). Floral structure, development, and relationships of paleoherbs, Saruma, Cabomba, Lactoris and selected Piperales. In Flowering Plant Origin, Evolution and Phylogeny, ed. and . New York: Chapman and Hall, pp. 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993). Utility of ontogenetic and conventional characters in determining phylogenetic relationships of Saururaceae and Piperaceae (Piperales). Syst. Bot. 18, 614–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976a). Developmental studies in Ptychosperma (Palmae) I. The inflorescence and flower cluster. Am. J. Bot. 63, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976b). Developmental studies in Ptychosperma (Palmae) II. The staminate and pistillate flowers. Am. J. Bot. 63, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1980). Androecial development in six polyandrous genera representing five major groups of palms. Ann. Bot. 45, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Elaborate petals in Australian Spermacoce (Rubiaceae) species, morphology, ontogeny and function. Ann. Bot. 98, 1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1987). Androecium development in Actinidia chinensis and A. melanandra (Actinidiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109, 17–23Google Scholar
(1993). Floral ontogeny of Archidendron luceyi (Mimosaceae), with remarks on Amherstia nobilis (Caesalpiniaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 114, 551–560.Google Scholar
(1995). Morphology of the gynoecium of Kitaibelia vitifolia Willd. and Malope trifida L. (Malvaceae-Malopeae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117, 485–493.Google Scholar
, , and (1993). A comparative floral developmental study in Pisonia, Bougainvillea and Mirabilis (Nyctaginaceae) with special emphasis on the gynoecium and floral nectaries. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 62, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). The floral development of Monococcus echinophorus (Phytolaccaceae). Can. J. Bot. 75, 1941–1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996). Floral ontogeny of five species of Talinum and of related taxa (Portulacaceae). J. Plant Res. 109, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). floral ontogeny of Anacampseros subg. Anacampseros sect. Anacampseros (Portulacaceae). Syst. Geogr. Pl. 68, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1952). Floral anatomy of some Malvales and its bearing on the affinities of families included in the order. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 31, 171–203.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2003). Inside-out flowers characteristic of Lacandonia schismatica evolved at least before its divergence from a closely related taxon, Triuris brevistylis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Revision of Magodendron (Sapotaceae) with observations on floral development and morphology. Blumea 40, 91–107.Google Scholar
(1997). Remarkable nectaries, structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives I. Substitutive nectaries. Flora 192, 305–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a). Remarkable nectaries, structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives II. Nectarioles. Flora 193, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998b). Remarkable nectaries, structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives III. Nectar ducts. Flora 193, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998c). Remarkable nectaries, structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives IV. Miscellaneous cases. Flora 193, 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). The floral nectaries of Malvaceae sensu lato: a conspectus. Kurtziana 28, 155–171.Google Scholar
, , and (2004). Comparative floral development and androecium structure in Malvoideae (Malvaceae s.l.). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002a). Reproductive structures and systematics of Buxaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002b). Development of inflorescences and flowers in Buxaceae and the problem of perianth interpretation. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 847–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Floral structure and organization in Platanaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 170, 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (2006). Structure and evolution of the androecium in the Malvatheca clade (Malvaceae s.l.) and implications for Malvaceae and Malvales. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 171–197.Google Scholar
and (1984). The nectaries of the Dipsacales and their systematic significance. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 104, 483–507.Google Scholar
and (2000). The evolution of staminodes in Angiosperms: patterns of stamen reduction, loss, and functional re-invention. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Ebenaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI, ed. and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2006). Floral organogenesis of Cocculus orbiculatus and Stephania dielsiana (Menispermaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 167, 951–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2009). Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 3853–3858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1991). Floral structure and evolution in the Anacardiaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 107, 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). The Gunnera flower: key to eudicot diversification or response to pollination mode?Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 945–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Floral development of Meliosma (Sabiaceae): evidence for multiple origins of pentamery in the eudicots. Am. J. Bot. 94, 1828–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Perianth evolution in the Sandalwood order Santalales. Am. J. Bot. 96, 1361–1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1989). Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Grossulariaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. IX, ed. and . Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 168–176.Google Scholar
, and (1994). Relationships of Droseraceae: a cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence and morphological data. Am. J. Bot. 81, 1027–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989). Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae sensu lato XVII. Floral anatomy of Ondinea purpurea ssp. purpurea (Nymphaeaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76, 1779–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2008). The Huertales clade identified to contain Dipentodon, Perrottetia, Huertea, Tapiscia and Gerrardina, and to be sister to Brassicales plus Malvales. In Systematics 2008: Programme and Abstracts, Göttingen 7–11 April 2008, ed. et al. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag, p. 350.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2007). Phylogeny of basal eudicots: insights from non-coding and rapidly evolving DNA. Org. Div. Evol. 7, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). The identification of A-, B-, C-, and E-class Mads-Box genes and implications for perianth evolution in the basal eudicot Trochodendron aralioides (Trochodendraceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 775–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Floral ontogeny of two species of Magnolia L. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 48, 1197–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Comparative floral anatomy and ontogeny in Magnoliaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 258, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). Apports de l'étude comparée des nectaires floraux à la conception phylogénétique de l'ordre des Centrospermes. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 90, 105–125.Google Scholar
, , , and (2003). Phylogenetic analyses and perianth evolution in basal Angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 90, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Floral morphology and development in Sargentodoxa (Lardizabalaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 1148–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Ontogeny of floral organs and morphology of floral apex in Phellodendron amurense (Rutaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 50, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1965). On the androecium of Tamarix flower and its evolutionary trends. Israel J. Bot. 14, 101–111.Google Scholar