Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:19:59.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Scientific Understanding of Ecosystem Services

from Assessment of Major Ecosystem Services from the Marine Environment (Other than Provisioning Services)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

United Nations
Affiliation:
Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs
Get access

Summary

Introduction to the concept of ecosystem services from oceans

Humanity has always drawn sustenance from the ocean through fishing, harvesting and trade. Today 44 per cent of the world's population lives on or within 150 kilometres from the coast (United Nations Atlas of Oceans). However this fundamental connection between nature and people has only very recently been incorporated into trans-disciplinary thinking on how we manage and account for the human benefits we get from nature. Today, when a product taken from an ecosystem1, for example, fibres, timber or fish, enters the economic cycle (i.e., a part of the human system), it receives a monetary value that accounts at least for the costs associated with its extraction and mobilization. If that natural product is the result of cultivation, as in the case of agriculture, forestry and aquaculture, the monetary value also includes the production costs. However, the extraction of natural products and other human benefits from ecosystems has implicit costs of production and other ancillary costs associated with preserving the integrity of the natural production system itself. Traditionally these benefits and costs have been hidden within the “natural system,” and are not accounted for financially; such hidden costs and benefits are considered “externalities” by neoclassical economists. While the neoclassical economic toolbox includes non-market valuation approaches, an ecosystem services approach emphasizes that ‘price’ is not equal to “value” and highlights human well-being, as a normative goal. The emergence and evolution of the ecosystem services concept offers an explicit attempt to better capture and reflect these hidden or unaccounted benefits and associated costs when the natural “production” system is negatively affected by human activities. The ecosystem services approach has proven to be very useful in the management of multi-sector processes and already informs many management and regulatory processes around the world (e.g. United Kingdom National Ecosystem Assessment, 2011).

Ecosystems, including marine ecosystems, provide services to people, which are life-sustaining and contribute to human health and wellbeing (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; de Groot, 2011). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment defines an ecosystem as “a dynamic complex of plant, animal and micro-organism communities and their non-living environment interacting as a functional unit” and goes on to define ecosystem services as “the benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems” (p. 27).

Type
Chapter
Information
The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
World Ocean Assessment I
, pp. 67 - 90
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, I., Boumans, R., Roman, J., Gopal, S. and Kaufman, L. (2014). An Ecosystem Accounting Framework for Marine Ecosystem-Based Management. In: Fogarty, M. J. and McCarthy, J. J. (eds.) Marine Ecosystem-based Management. Harvard University Press.
Aronson, J., Milton, S.J., and Blignaut, J.N. (eds.). (2007). Restoring natural capital: science, business, and practice. Island Press, Washington, DC. DOI 10.3368/ er.24.1.22.
Barbier, E.B., Koch, E.W., Silliman, B.R., Hacker, S.D., Wolanski, E., Primavera, J., Granek, E.F., Polasky, S., Aswani, S., Cramer, L. A., Stoms, D.M., Kennedy, C. J., Bael, D., Kappel, C.V., Perillo, G.M.E. and Reed, D.J. (2008). Coastal ecosystembased management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science, 319, 321-323. DOI 10.1126/science.1150349.Google Scholar
Berry, M. and BenDor, T.K. 2015. Integrating sea level rise into development suitability analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 51, 13-24. Available: DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.12.004Google Scholar
Beymer-Farris, B.A. and Bassett, T.J. (2012). The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania's mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change, 22, 332-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.006.Google Scholar
Bigagli, E. (2015). The EU legal framework for the management of marine complex social-ecological systems. Marine Policy, 54, 44-51. Available: DOI 10.1016/j. marpol.2014.11.025.Google Scholar
Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Baulcomb, C., Koss, R., Hussain, S.S. and de Groot, R.S. (2013). Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 135-145. Available: DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.027.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616-626.Google Scholar
Braat, L.C. and de Groot, R. (2012). The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services, 1, 4-15.Google Scholar
Bscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., and Brockington, D. (2012). Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 23(2), 4-30.Google Scholar
Buck, B.H., Krause, G. and Rosenthal, H. (2004). Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Ocean & Coastal Management, 47, 95-122.Google Scholar
Burkhard, F., Kroll, Nedkov, S. and Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29.Google Scholar
Butler, J.R.A., Wong, G.Y., Metcalfe, D.J., Honzak, M., Pert, P.L., Rao, N., van Grieken, M.E., Lawson, T., Bruce, C., Kroon, F.J. and Brodie, J.E. (2013). An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 180, 176-191.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W. A. and Ludwig, D. (2007). Appropriate discounting leads to forward-looking ecosystem management. Ecological Research, 22, 10-11.Google Scholar
Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J. and Woodside, U. (2012). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bio- Science, 62, 744-756.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Andrade, F., Antunes, P., van den Belt, M., Boersma, D., Boesch, D.F., Catarino, F., Hanna, S., Limburg, K., Low, B., Molitor, M., Pereira, J. G., Rayner, S., Santos, R., Wilson, J. and Young, M. (1998). Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science, 281, 198-199.Google Scholar
Costanza, R. (2008). Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141, 350-352. DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Darge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Oneill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. DOI 10.1038/387253a0.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P.C., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S, Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. Turner, K. (2014). “Changes in the glogal value of ecosystem services.” Global Environmental Change, vol 26: 152-158.Google Scholar
Daily, G. (Ed.). (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
Daly, H. and Cobb, J. (1989). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Boston, Beacon Press.
Daly, H.E. and Farley, J. (2004). Ecological economics: principles and applications. Washington: Island Press. 454 pages.
de Groot, R. (2011). What are Ecosystem Services. In: Van den Belt, M. and Costanza, R. (eds.) Ecological Economics of Estuaries and Coasts. Elsevier Academic Press
Döring, R., and Egelkraut, T.M. (2008). Investing in natural capital as management strategy in fisheries: The case of the Baltic Sea cod fishery. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 634-642.Google Scholar
FAO. (2012). Payments for Ecosystem Services,(accessed 7 May 2015) http://www. fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/Factsheet_PES.pdf.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., and Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.09.014.Google Scholar
Farley, J. (2012). Ecosystem Services: The Economic Debate. Ecosystem Services, 1, 9.Google Scholar
Foley, M.M., Halpern, B.S., Micheli, F., Armsby, M.H., Caldwell, M.R., Crain, C.M., Prahler, E., Rohr, N., Sivas, D., Beck, M.W., Carr, M.H., Crowder, L.B., Emmett Duffy, J., Hacker, S.D., McLeod, K.L., Palumbi, S.R., Peterson, C.H., Regan, H.M., Ruckelshaus, M.H., Sandifer, P.A. and Steneck, R.S. (2010). Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 24, 11. DOI http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.001.Google Scholar
Ghermandi, A., Nunes, P., Portela, R., Rao, N. and Teelucksingh, S. (eds.) (2011). Recreational, Cultural, and Aesthetic Services from Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Granek, E.F., Polasky, S., Kappel, C.V., Stoms, D.M., Reed, D.J., Primavera, J., Koch, E.W., Kennedy, C., Cramer, L.A., Hacker, S.D., Perillo, G.M.E., Aswani, S., Silliman, B., Bael, D., Muthiga, N., Barbier, E.B., Wolanski, E. (2010). Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology 24, 207-216.Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2010). Proposal for a common international classification of ecosystem goods and services (CICES) for integrated environmental and economic accounting. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistical division, United Nations (ESA/STAT/AC.217-UNCEEA/5/7/Bk).
Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M., Steneck, R. and Watson, R. (2008). A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319, 948-952. DOI 10.1126/science.1149345.Google Scholar
Halpern, B.S., Longo, C., Hardy, D., McLeod, K.L., Samhouri, J.F., Katona, S.K., Kleisner, K., Lester, S.E., O'Leary, J., Ranelletti, M., Rosenberg, A.A., Scarborough, C., Selig, E.R., Best, B.D., Brumbaugh, D.R., Chapin, F.S., Crowder, L.B., Daly, K.L., Doney, S.C., Elfes, C., Fogarty, M.J., Gaines, S.D., Jacobsen, K.I., Karrer, L.B., Leslie, H.M., Neeley, E., Pauly, D., Polasky, S., Ris, B., St. Martin, K., Stone, G.S., Sumalia, U.R., Zeller, D., (2012). An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature, 488, 615. DOI 10.1038/nature11397.Google Scholar
Hendriks, K. Braat, L. Ruijs, A., van Egmond, P., Melman, D., van der Heide, M., Klok, C., Gaaff, Dietz, F. (2012). TEEB voor Fysiek Nederland, Alterra, Wageningen, ISSN 1566-7197 (page 32).
Kelble, C.R., Loomis, D.K., Lovelace, S., Nuttle, W.K., Ortner, P.B., Fletcher, P., Cook, G.S., Lorenz, J.J. and Boyer, J.N. (2013). The EBM-DPSER Conceptual Model: Integrating Ecosystem Services into the DPSIR Framework. PLoS ONE, 8(8): DOI:10.1371/ journal.pone.0070766.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-K., Toft, J.E., Papenfus, M., Verutes, G., Guerry, A.D., Ruckelshaus, M.H., Arekema, K.K., Guannel, G., Wood, S.A., Bernhardt, J.R., Tallis, H., Plummer, M.L., Halpern, B.S., Pinsky, M.L., Beck, M.W., Chan, F., Chan, K.M.A. and Polasky, S. (2012). Catching the right wave: evaluating wave energy resources and potental compatibility with existing marine and coastal uses. PLoS ONE, 7 (11). DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0047598.Google Scholar
Landers, D. H. and Nahlik, A.M. (2013). Final ecosystem goods and services classification system (FEGS-CS). Corvallis, Oregon: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Larigauderie, A., Mooney, H.A. (2010). The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 9-14. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006.Google Scholar
Lester, S.E., Costello, C., Halpern, B.S., Gaines, S.D., White, C. and Barth, J.A. (2012). Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 38, 80-89. DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022.Google Scholar
Liquete, C., Piroddi, C., Drakou, E. G., Gurney, L., Katsanevakis, S., Charef, A. and Egoh, B. (2013). Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 8(7). DOI 10.1371/ journal.pone.0067737.Google Scholar
Lui, S., Portela, R., Rao, N., Ghermandi, A., Wang, X. (2011). Environmental benefit transfers of ecosystem service valuation. In: Wolanski, E. and McClusky, D.S. (eds.) Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science. Burlington MA: Academic Press.
MacDiarmid, A.B., Law, C.S., Pinkerton, M., Zeldis, J. (2013). New Zealand marine ecosystem services. In Dymond, J.R. (ed.) Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand
Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J.P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E.G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., Luisa Paracchini, M., Braat, L. and Bidoglio, G. (2012a). Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31-39.Google Scholar
Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B. and Alkemade, R. (2012b). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155, 1-12. DOI http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.(2012).06.016.Google Scholar
Martinez-Harms, M.J. and Balvanera, P. (2012). Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services and Management, 8, 17-25.Google Scholar
McClintock, W., Paul, E., Burt, C. and Bryan, T. (2012). McClintock Lab: seasketch. UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150 Marine Science Institute. http:// mcclintock.msi.ucsb.edu/projects/seasketch [Accessed 13th September 2012].
McCauley, D.J. (2006). Nature: McCauley replies [4]. Nature, 443(7113), 750.Google Scholar
Menzel, S., Kappel, C.V., Broitman, B.R., Micheli, F. and Rosenberg, A.A. (2013). Linking human activity and ecosystem condition to inform marine ecosystem based management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 506.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington,D.C.
Pike, K., Wright, P., Wink, B., and Fletcher, S. (2014). The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology. Journal of Coastal Conservation.
Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V.J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. DOI Doi 10.1038/461472a.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J.P., Beard Jr, T.D., Bennett, E.M., Cumming, G.S., Cork, S.J., Agard, J., Dobson, A.P. and Peterson, G.D. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11.
Shaw, W. D. and Wlodarz, M. (2013). Ecosystems, ecological restoration, and economics: Does habitat or resource equivalency analysis mean other economic valuation methods are not needed? Ambio, 42, 628-643.Google Scholar
Tallis, H., Mooney, H., Andelman, S., Balvanera, P., Cramer, W., Karp, D., Polasky, S., Reyers, B., Ricketts, T., Running, S., Thonicke, K., Tietjen, B. and Walz, A. (2012). A Global System for Monitoring Ecosystem Service Change. BioScience, 62, 977-986. DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.7.Google Scholar
TEEB. (2009). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).
TEEB. (2010a). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations Earthscan, London and Washington.
TEEB. (2010b). Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity.
TEEB. (2010c). A quick guide to TEEB for Local and Regional Policy Makers. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).
Townsend, M. Thrush, S. (2010). Ecosystem functioning, goods and services in the coastal environment. Prepared by the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research for Auckland Regional Council. Auckland Regional Council Technical Report 2010/033.
Townsend, M., Thrush, S. F. and Carbines, M. J. (2011). Simplifying the complex: An ‘Ecosystem principles approach’ to goods and services management in marine coastal ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 434, 291-301.Google Scholar
United Nations Atlas of Oceans, www.oceansatlas.org, accessed on 16 April, 2015
United Nations Statistics Division. (2013). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. European Commission, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, World Bank.
UK National Ecosystem Assessment. (2011). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
van den Belt, M. (2011a). Ecological Economics of Estuaries and Coasts. In: Wolanski, E. and McClusky, D.S. (eds.) Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science. Burlington MA: Academic Press.
van den Belt, M., Forgie, V.E. and Farley, J. (2011b). Valuation of Coastal Ecosystem Services. In: Wolanski, E. and D.S., M. (eds.) Ecological Economics of Estuaries and Coasts. Burlington MA: Elsevier.
van den Belt, M., McCallion, A., Wairepo, S., Hardy, D., Hale, L. and Berry, M. (2012). Mediated Modelling of Coastal Ecosystem Services: A case study of Te Awanui Tauranga Harbour, Manaaki Taho Moana project.
van den Belt, M. (2013, August 26-30). Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation Case Studies, Valuation Databases and Ecosystem Services Modeling, Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Ecosystem Services Partnership Conference, Bali, Indonesia.
van den Belt, M. and Cole, A.O. (2014). Ecosystem Services of Marine Protected Areas. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation.
Wegner, G., and Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 492-504.Google Scholar
White, C., Halpern, B.S. and Kappel, C.V. (2012). Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4696-4701. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114215109.Google Scholar
Wolff, S., Schulp, C.J.E. and Verburg, P.H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159-171. Available: DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016.Google Scholar
Zurlini, G., Petrosillo, I., Aretano, R., Castorini, I., D'Arpa, S., De Marco, A., Pasimeni, M.R., Semeraro, T. and Zaccarelli, N. (2014). Key fundamental aspects for mapping and assessing ecosystem services: Predictability of ecosystem service providers at scales from local to global. Annali di Botanica, 4, 53-63. Available: DOI 10.4462/ annbotrm-11754.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×