Abbott, Andrew. 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A.. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A.. 2012. Why Nations Fail: Origins of Power, Poverty and Prosperity. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A.. 2003. “An African success story: Botswana.” In Rodrik, Dani (ed.), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 80–122.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A.. 2005. “Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth.” In Aghion, Philippe, Durlauf, Steven N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1 A (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 385–472.Google Scholar

Adcock, Robert K. 2008. “The curious career of ‘the comparative method’: The case of Mill’s methods.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Agar, Michael. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Alesina, Alberto, Giuliano, Paola, Nunn, Nathan. 2013. “On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128, 2: 469–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. “Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare state?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 187–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Bernhard, Münch, Richard, Smelser, Neil J. (eds.) 1987. The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Alford, Robert R., Friedland, Roger. 1985. The Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Paul D., Stewart, John A.. 1974. “Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage.” American Sociological Review 39, 4: 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alperovitz, Gar. 1996. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Alston, Lee J., Libecap, Gary D., Schnieder, Robert. 1996. “The determinants and impact of property rights: Land titles on the Brazilian frontier.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 12: 25–61.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying political regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31, 2: 3–36.Google Scholar

Alvesson, Mats, Kärreman, Dan. 2011. Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery as Method. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvesson, Mats, Sandberg, Jörgen. 2013. Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, Teresa M. 1982. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin. 1991. “Making the most of a case study: Theories of the welfare state and the American experience.” In Ragin, Charles C. (ed.), Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research (Leiden: E. J. Brill), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D. 1990. “Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records.” American Economic Review 80, 3: 313–336.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D., Chen, Stacey H.. 2011. “Schooling and the Vietnam-era GI Bill: Evidence from the draft lottery.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3: 96–118.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D., Krueger, Alan B.. 2001. “Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 4: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D., Lavy, Victor. 1999. “Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 2: 533–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D., Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, Ben W., Samuels, David J.. 2014. Inequality and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., Stewart, Charles III. 2000. “Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 1: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arieti, Silvano. 1980. Creativity: The Magic Synthesis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Arquilla, John. 2012. “Cyberwar is already upon us.” Foreign Policy 192: 1–4.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1994. “Methodological individualism and social knowledge.” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 84, 2: 1–9.Google Scholar

Aymard, Maurice. 1982. “From feudalism to capitalism in Italy: The case that doesn’t fit.” Review 6: 131–208.Google Scholar

Azoulay, Pierre, Fons-Rosen, Christian, Joshua, S. Zivin, Graff. 2019. “Does science advance one funeral at a time?” American Economic Review 109, 8: 2889–2920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Backhouse, Roger E. 2007. “Lives in synopsis: The production and use of short biographies by historians of economics.” History of Political Economy 39, 1: 51–75.Google Scholar

Baer, Michael A., Jewell, Malcolm E., Sigelman, Lee (eds.) 2014. Political Science in America: Oral Histories of a Discipline. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Ball, Philip. 2012. Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ballard, Michael J., Mitchell, Neil J.. 1998. “The good, the better, and the best in political science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23: 826–828.Google Scholar

Ballas, Dimitris, Clarke, Graham, Franklin, Rachel S., Newing, Andy. 2017. GIS and the Social Sciences: Theory and Applications. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, Antoine J., Hicks, Heather M.. 2016. “Fear and implicit racism: Whites’ support for voter ID laws.” Political Psychology 37, 5: 641–658.Google Scholar

Banks, Marcus. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsky, Robert F. 1998. Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baumol, William J. 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayer, Alan E., Smart, John C.. 1991. “Career publication patterns and ‘styles’ in American academic science.” Journal of Higher Education 62: 613–636.Google Scholar

Beard, Charles. 1913. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1960. “An economic analysis of fertility.” In Dinkel, Robert M. (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 209–240.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S., Murphy, Kevin M.. 1988. “A theory of rational addiction.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 4: 675–700.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 1986. Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research while You’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Behrens, John T., Chong-ho, Yu. 2003. “Exploratory data analysis.” In Weiner, Irving B., Freedheim, Donald K., Schinka, John A., Velicer, Wayne F. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley), 33–64.Google Scholar

Benedict, Barbara. 2002. Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Enquiry. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Bergan, Daniel E. 2009. “The draft lottery and attitudes towards the Vietnam war.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73, 2: 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, De Meur, Gisele. 1994. “Conditions of democracy in interwar Europe: A Boolean test of major hypotheses.” Comparative Politics 26, 3: 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkun, Scott. 2010. The Myths of Innovation. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar

Bertamini, Marco, Munafo, Marcus R.. 2012. “Bite-size science and its undesired side effects.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 1: 67–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bien, Jacob, Taylor, Jonathan, Tibshirani, Robert. 2013. “A LASSO for hierarchical interactions.” Annals of Statistics 41, 3: 1111–1141.Google Scholar

Birks, Melanie, Mills, Jane. 2015. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Blattman, Christopher. 2009. “From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review 103, 2: 231–247.Google Scholar

Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Blaug, Mark. 1989. Great Economists before Keynes: An Introduction to the Lives and Works of One Hundred Great Economists of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bloxham, Donald, Moses, A. Dirk (eds.) 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blumstein, Alfred, Wallman, Joel (eds.) 2006. The Crime Drop in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boden, Margaret. 2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles, Stokes, Susan C.. 2003. “Endogenous democratization.” World Politics 55, 4: 517–549.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles, Miller, Michael, Rosato, Sebastian. 2013. “A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007.” Comparative Political Studies 46, 12: 1523–1554.Google Scholar

Bolles, Richard Nelson. 2009. The 2009 What Color Is Your Parachute? A Practical Manual for Job-Hunters and Career-Changers. Berkeley, CA: Random House.Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph, Fitzgerald, William T.. 2016. The Craft of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., Johnson, Jeffrey C.. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E. 2011. “The art of political science: Spatial diagrams as iconic and revelatory.” Perspectives on Politics 9: 311–331.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E., Collier, David (eds.) 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E., McNulty, John E.. 2011. “Turning out to vote: The costs of finding and getting to the polling place.” American Political Science Review 105, 1: 115–134.Google Scholar

Braumoeller, Bear F. 2019. Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo. 1996. “Out-of-bag estimation.” Manuscript. Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Breiman, Leo. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, Jason. 2020. Good Work If You Can Get It: How to Succeed in Academia. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Breuer, Peter T., Bowen, Jonathan P.. 2014. “Empirical patterns in Google Scholar citation counts.” ArXiv:1401.1861 [Cs], April, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2014.55.Google Scholar

Brickman, Philip, Coates, Dan, Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie. 1978. “Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 8: 917.Google Scholar

Briggs, John. 2000. Fire in the Crucible: Understanding the Process of Creative Genius. Grand Rapids: Phanes Press.Google Scholar

Brollo, Fernanda, Nannicini, Tommaso, Perotti, Roberto, Tabellini, Guido. 2013. “The political resource curse.” American Economic Review 103, 5: 1759–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, James Robert. 1991. Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Buchbinder, Susan, Vittinghoff, Eric. 1999. “HIV-infected long-term nonprogressors: Epidemiology, mechanisms of delayed progression, and clinical and research implications.” Microbes Infect 1, 13: 1113–1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buhaug, Halvard, Cederman, Lars-Erik, Gleditsch, Kristian S.. 2014. “Square pegs in round holes: Inequalities, grievances, and civil war.” International Studies Quarterly 58, 2: 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 1981. Do New Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bunge, Mario. 1997. “Mechanism and explanation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27: 410–465.Google Scholar

Bunzl, Martin. 2004. “Counterfactual history: A user’s guide.” American Historical Review 109, 3: 845–858.Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The extended case method.” Sociological Theory 16, 1: 4–33.Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael. 2009. The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael, Gamson, Joshua, Burton, Alice. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burt, Ronald S. 2004. “Structural holes and good ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110, 2: 349–399.Google Scholar

Busby, Ethan C., Gubler, Joshua R., Hawkins, Kirk A.. 2019. “Framing and blame attribution in populist rhetoric.” Journal of Politics 81, 2: 616–630.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. 1995. “The level of analysis problem in international relations reconsidered.” In Booth, Ken, Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theory Today (Philadelphia, PA: Penn State University Press), 198–216.Google Scholar

Caldwell, John C. 1986. “Routes to low mortality in poor countries.” Population and Development Review 12, 2: 171–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. 1960. “Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.” Psychological Review 67: 380–400.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. 1975. “III. Degrees of freedom and the case study.” Comparative Political Studies 8, 2: 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, John Paul, Daft, Richard L., Hulin, Charles L.. 1982. What to Study: Generating and Developing Research Questions. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Caplan, Bryan. 2018. The Case against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni, Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2007. “The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism.” World Politics 59, 3: 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 2007. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cascio, Elizabeth U., Lewis, Ethan G.. 2006. “Schooling and the armed forces qualifying test: Evidence from school-entry laws.” Journal of Human Resources 41, 2: 294–318.Google Scholar

Cattaneo, Matias D., Idrobo, Nicolás, Titiunik, Rocío. 2019. A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caughey, Devin, Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2011. “Elections and the regression discontinuity design: Lessons from close US House races, 1942–2008.” Political Analysis 19, 4: 385–408.Google Scholar

Chamon, Marcos, Firpo, Sergio, de Mello, João M. P., Pieri, Renan. 2018. “Electoral rules, political competition and fiscal expenditures: Regression discontinuity evidence from Brazilian municipalities.” Journal of Development Studies 55, 1: 1–20.Google Scholar

Chan, Winnie Wing-Yi. 2006. “A survey on multidimensional data visualization.” Manuscript. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India.” Econometrica 72, 5: 1409–1443.Google Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and dictatorship revisited.” Public choice 143, 1–2: 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chong, Alberto, De La O, Ana L., Karlan, Dean, Wantchekon, Leonard. 2015. “Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification.” Journal of Politics 77, 1: 55–71.Google Scholar

Chong, Dennis, Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christenson, Cornelia V. 1971. Kinsey: A Biography. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Cirillo, Pasquale, Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. 2016. “The decline of violent conflicts: What do the data really say?” The Nobel Foundation, Causes of Peace, NYU Tandon Research Paper 2876315.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kevin A., Primo, David M.. 2012. A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clement, John. 2008. Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Cohen, Martin. 2008. Wittgenstein’s Beetle and Other Classic Thought Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Cohen, Morris R., Nagel, Ernest. 1934. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S., Katz, Elihu, Menzel, Herbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Finifter, Ada W. (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II (Washington, DC: American Political Science Association), 105–119.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 1995. “Trajectory of a concept: ‘Corporatism’ in the study of Latin American politics.” In Smith, Peter (ed.), Latin America in Comparative Perspective. (Boulder, CO: Westview), 135–162.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 1999. “Data, fieldwork, and extracting new ideas at close range.” APSA-CP Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association 10, 1–2: 4–6.Google Scholar

Collier, David, Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research.” World Politics 49, 3: 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David, Mahoney, James. 1996. “Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research.” World Politics 49: 56–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David, Gerring, John (eds.) 2009. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collier, David, LaPorte, Jody, Seawright, Jason. 2012. “Putting typologies to work: Concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor.” Political Research Quarterly 65, 1: 217–232.Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins, Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conley, Dalton, Heerwig, Jennifer. 2012. “The long-term effects of military conscription on mortality: Estimates from the Vietnam-era draft lottery.” Demography 49: 841–855.Google Scholar

Converse, Jean M. 2009. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cook, Fay Lomax, Page, Benjamin I., Moskovitz, Rachel L.. 2014. “Political engagement by wealthy Americans.” Political Science Quarterly 129, 3: 381–398.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, Teorell, Jan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach.” Perspectives on Politics 9, 1: 247–267.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Glynn, Adam, Lindberg, Staffan I., Pemstein, Daniel, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Seim, Brigitte, Teorell, Jan. 2020. Varieties of Democracy: Measuring a Century of Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cordesman, Anthony H. 2017. Trends in European Terrorism: 1970–2016. Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar

Cornell, Svante E. 2002. “Autonomy as a source of conflict: Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspective.” World Politics 54: 245–276.Google Scholar

Cowley, Robert (ed.) 2000. What If? The World’s Foremost Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Cowley, Robert (ed.) 2003. More What If? Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar

Coyle, Diane. 2015. GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1997. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Cullen, Julie Berry, Jacob, Brian A., Levitt, Steven. 2006. “The effect of school choice on participants: Evidence from randomized lotteries.” Econometrica 74, 5: 1191–1230.Google Scholar

Curtiss, Susan. 1977. Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day “Wild Child.” Boston, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cyr, Jennifer. 2019. Focus Groups for the Social Science Researcher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daalder, Hans, Allardt, Erik (eds.) 1997. Comparative European Politics: The Story of a Profession. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Dacey, John S., Lennon, Kathleen, Fiore, Lisa B.. 1998. Understanding Creativity: The Interplay of Biological, Psychological, and Social Factors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., Lindblom, Charles E.. 1976. Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., Tufte, Edward. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Dal Bó, Ernesto, Rossi, Martín A. 2011. “Term length and the effort of politicians.” The Review of Economic Studies 78, 4: 1237–1263.Google Scholar

Daniels, Peter T., Bright, William (eds.) 1996. The World’s Writing Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1881. The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Action of Worms, with Observations on Their Habits. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1942. The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs. London: Smith, Elder.Google Scholar

Davis, Joe C., Patterson, Debra Morre. 2001. “Determinants of variations in journal publication rates of economists.” American Economist 45, 1: 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, Kami, Eodice, Michele. 2001. (First person) 2: A Study of Co-authoring in the Academy. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Deaton, Angus. 2014. “Puzzles and paradoxes: A life in applied economics.” In Szenberg, Michael, Ramrattan, Lall (eds.), Eminent Economists II: Their Life and Work Philosophies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 84–101.Google Scholar

Edward, De Bono. 1992. Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

De Chadarevian, Soraya, Hopwood, Nick (eds.) 2004. Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Deininger, Klaus, Squire, Lyn. 1998. “New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth.” Journal of Development Economics 57, 2: 259–287.Google Scholar

DeNicola, Daniel R. 2017. Understanding Ignorance: The Surprising Impact of What We Don’t Know. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Denscombe, Martyn. 2012. Research Proposals: A Practical Guide. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Derthick, Martha. 1979. Policymaking for Social Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, Ian, Newby, Margaret, Varle, Sarah. 1999. “Female education and fertility: Examining the links.” In Bledsoe, Caroline H., Casterline, John B., Johnson-Kuhn, Jennifer A., Haaga, John G. (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Schooling and Fertility in the Developing World (Washington, DC: National Academy Press), 23–48.Google Scholar

Diamond, Jared. 1992. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1998. “Evidence and inference in the comparative case study.” Comparative Politics 30, 2: 127–145.Google Scholar

Dixit, Avinash. 2014. “My philosophy of economics, life, and everything (not!).” In Szenberg, Michael, Ramrattan, Lall (eds.), Eminent Economists II: Their Life and Work Philosophies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 118–128.Google Scholar

Dixit, Avinash K., Skeath, Susan. 2015. Games of Strategy: Fourth International Student Edition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Dodge, Martin, McDerby, Mary, Turner, Martin (eds.) 2011. Geographic Visualization: Concepts, Tools and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Doherty, Daniel, Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P.. 2006. “Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: A study of lottery winners.” Political Psychology 27, 3: 441–458.Google Scholar

DonohueIII, John J., Levitt, Steven D.. 2001. “The impact of legalized abortion on crime.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 2: 379–420.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary, Wildavsky, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Douven, Igor. 2011. “Abduction” and “Supplement to abduction: Peirce on abduction.” In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.Google Scholar

Downing, Brian M. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dreze, Jean, Sen, Amartya. 1989. Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., Lupia, Arthur (eds.) 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dubin, Robert. 1969. Theory Building. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Ductor, Lorenzo. 2015. “Does co‐authorship lead to higher academic productivity?” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 77, 3: 385–407.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Kevin. 2001. “What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition.” In Crowley, Kevin, Schunn, Christian D., Ocada, Takeshi (eds.), Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 115–140.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick. 2003. Authoring a PhD: How to Plan, Draft, Write and Finish a Doctoral Thesis or Dissertation. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2010. “Design-based inference: Beyond the pitfalls of regression analysis?” In Brady, Henry, Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 273–311.Google Scholar

Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dyson, Tim. 2001. “A partial theory of world development: The neglected role of the demographic transition in the shaping of modern society.” International Journal of Population Geography 7: 67–90.Google Scholar

Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence.” In David, Paul A., Reder, Melvin W. (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth (New York: Academic Press), 89–125.Google Scholar

Easterly, William. 2006. The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Easterly, William, Levine, Ross. 2016. “The European origins of economic development.” Journal of Economic Growth 21, 3: 225–257.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case studies and theory in political science.” In Greenstein, Fred I., Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7 Political Science: Scope and Theory (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley), 79–138.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry, Gurr, Ted Robert. 1975. Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Eidlin, Fred. 2011. “The method of problems versus the method of topics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44, 4: 758–761.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert, L. Infeld. 1938. The Evolution of Physics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. 1951. Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist, Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), New York: Tudor.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. 1995. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin. 2005. “Explanatory typologies in qualitative studies of international politics.” International Organization 59, 2: 293–326.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin, Elman, Miriam. 2002. “How not to be Lakatos-intolerant: Appraising progress in IR research.” International Studies Quarterly 46: 231–262.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin, Gerring, John, Mahoney, James (eds.) 2020. The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1998. “A plea for mechanisms.” In Hedström, Peter, Swedberg, Richard (eds.), Social Mechanisms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 45–73.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 2015. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Emigh, Rebecca. 1997. “The power of negative thinking: The use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory.” Theory and Society 26: 649–684.Google Scholar

Epstein, David. 2019. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Epstein, Leon D. 1964. “A comparative study of Canadian parties.” American Political Science Review 58: 46–59.Google Scholar

Ericsson, Karl A., Krampe, Ralf T., Tesch-Römer, Clemens. 1993. “The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.” Psychological Review 100, 3: 363–406.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., Stoker, Laura. 2011. “Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes.” American Political Science Review 105, 2: 221–237.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fann, K. T. 1970. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Farr, James. 2004. “Social capital: A conceptual history.” Political Theory 32, 1: 6–33.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles, Turner, Mark. 2008. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D., Laitin, David D.. 2008. “Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., Collier, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 756–777.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D., Laitin, David D.. 2014. “Civil war non-onsets: The case of Japan.” Journal of Civilization Studies 1, 1: 67–90.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D., Laitin, David D.. 2015. “Random Narratives.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Stanford University. web.stanford.edu/group/ethnic/Random%20Narratives/random%20narratives.htm.Google Scholar

Fender, Blakely F., Taylor, Susan W., Burke, Kimberly G.. 2005. “Making the big leagues: Factors contributing to publication in elite economic journals.” Atlantic Economic Journal 33: 93–103.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1986. “Observation, context, and sequence in the study of politics.” American Political Science Review 80, 1: 3–15.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. 2008. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Ferguson, R. Brian. 2013. “The prehistory of war and peace in Europe and the Near East.” In Fry, Douglas P. (ed.), War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 191–240.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993 [1975]. Against Method, 3rd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fields, Gary. 2001. Distribution and Development, A New Look at the Developing World. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Findley, Michael G., Denly, Michael, Kikuta, Kyosuke. 2022. External Validity for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Finlay, Linda, Gough, Brendan (eds.) 2003. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Firebaugh, Glenn. 2008. Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Firestein, Stuart. 2012. Ignorance: How It Drives Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Firestein, Stuart. 2015. Failure: Why Science Is So Successful. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. 2009. The Crack-up. New York: New Directions Publishing.Google Scholar

Fleck, Ludwik. 1935/1979. The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fogel, Robert William. 1964. Railroads and American Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Fogel, Robert William. 1966. “The new economic history. Its findings and methods.” The Economic History Review 19, 3: 642–656.Google Scholar

Ford, Cameron M., Gioia, Dennis A. (eds.) 1995. Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory Tower Visions and Real World Voices. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Forrester, Andrew C., Powell, Benjamin, Nowrasteh, Alex, Rastgrave, Michaelangelo. 2019. “Do immigrants import terrorism?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 166: 529–543.Google Scholar

Forster, E. M. 1927. Aspects of the Novel. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Foster, Jacob G., Rzhetsky, Andrey, Evans, James A.. 2015. “Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies.” American Sociological Review 80, 5: 875–908.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1996. “The masked philosopher.” In Foucault Live: Interviews, 1966–1984, 2nd ed. Lotringer, Sylvere (ed.), Lysa Hochroth (trans.) (New York: Semiotext[e]), 302–307.Google Scholar

Fox, Mary Frank, Faver, Catherine A.. 1984. “Independence and cooperation in research: The motivations and costs of collaboration.” The Journal of Higher Education 55, 3: 347–359.Google Scholar

Franco, Annie, Malhotra, Neil, Simonovits, Gabor. 2014. “Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer.” Science 345, 6203: 1502–1505.Google Scholar

Frappier, Mélanie, Meynell, Letitia, Brown, James Robert (eds.) 2013. Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical models and shoe leather.” Sociological Methodology 21: 291–313.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J. 2001. “Corruption concepts in historical perspective.” In Heidenheimer, Arnold J, Johnston, Michael (eds.), Political Corruption: Concepts & Contexts (New York: Routledge), 15–23.Google Scholar

Fujii, Lee Ann. 2018. Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fulton, Sarah A. 2012. “Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success.” Political Research Quarterly 65, 2: 303–314.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. Garrett Barden and John Cumming (trans.). New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar

Galbraith, John Kenneth. 2009. The Great Crash 1929. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Galenson, David W. 2006. Old Masters and Young Geniuses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Galileo, . 1974. Two New Sciences, trans. from the Discorsi by S. Drake. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Gallego, Aina. 2010. “Understanding unequal turnout: Education and voting in comparative perspective.” Electoral Studies 29, 2: 239–248.Google Scholar

Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mazzuca, Sebastian, Nichter, Simeon. 2014. “Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections.” American Journal of Political Science 58, 2: 415–432.Google Scholar

Gardner, Howard. 2011. Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, Raymond Duncan. 1990. “The comparative survey of freedom: Experiences and suggestions.” Studies in Comparative International Development 25, 1: 25–50.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics.” Political Analysis 2: 131–150.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What do we know about democratization after twenty years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, Frantz, Erica. 2014. “Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set.” Perspectives on Politics 12, 2: 313–331.Google Scholar

Geer, John Gray. 1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Peddlers and Princes: Social Change and Economic Modernization in Two Indonesian Towns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Notes on the Balinese cockfight.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1974. “‘From the native’s point of view’: On the nature of anthropological understanding.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28, 1: 26–45.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew. 2003. “A Bayesian formulation of exploratory data analysis and goodness‐of‐fit testing.” International Statistical Review 71, 2: 369–382.Google Scholar

Génaux, Maryvonne. 2004. “Social sciences and the evolving concept of corruption.” Crime, Law and Social Change 42, 1: 13–24.Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabo. 2000. Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., Smoke, Richard. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Gerard, Philip. 2017. The Art of Creative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2008. “The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box.” British Journal of Political Science 38, 1: 161–179.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2010. “Causal mechanisms: Yes, but … ” Comparative Political Studies 43, 11: 1499–1526.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012a. “Mere description.” British Journal of Political Science 42, 4: 721–746.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2012b. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2017. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2020. “Coordinating reappraisals.” In Elman, Colin, Gerring, John, Mahoney, James (eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 334–353.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Christenson, Dino. 2017. Applied Social Science Methodology: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, McDermott, Rose. 2007. “An experimental template for case-study research.” American Journal of Political Science 51, 3: 688–701.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Veenendaal, Wouter. 2020. Population and Politics: The Impact of Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Yesnowitz, Joshua. 2006. “A normative turn in political science?” Polity 38, 1: 101–133.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Karcher, Sebastian, Apfeld, Brendan. 2020. “Impact Metrics.” In Elman, Colin, Gerring, John, Mahoney, James (eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 371–400.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Seawright, Jason, Shen, Kyle. 2020. “Where do research ideas come from? Finding topics in political science research.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Oncel, Erzen, Morrison, Kevin, Pemstein, Daniel. 2019. “Who rules the world? A portrait of the global leadership class.” Perspectives on Politics 17, 4: 1079–1097.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Wig, Tore, Tollefsen, Andreas, Apfeld, Brendan. 2018. “Harbors and Democracy.” Varieties of Democracy Working Paper.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Apfeld, Brendan, Wig, Tore, Tollefsen, Andreas. 2022. The Deep Roots of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John, Ziblatt, Daniel, Van Gorp, Johan, Arevalo, Julian. 2011. “An institutional theory of direct and indirect rule.” World Politics 63, 3: 377–433.Google Scholar

Gertner, Jon. 2012. The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, Brewster (ed.) 1985. The Creative Process: Reflections on the Invention in the Arts and Sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gholson, Barry, Shadish, William R., Neimeyer, Robert A., Houts, Arthur C. (eds.) 1989. Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald N. 1990. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gingras, Yves. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gisselquist, Rachel M. 2014. “Paired comparison and theory development: Considerations for case selection.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47, 2: 477–484.Google Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Hachette UK.Google Scholar

Gladwin, Christina H. 1989. Ethnographic Decision Tree Modeling. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney, Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, Vlad Petre (ed.) 2019. The Creativity Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Hegre, Håvard. 1997. “Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, 2: 283–310.Google Scholar

Glynn, Adam N., Ichino, Nahomi. 2015. “Using qualitative information to improve causal inference.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 1055–1071.Google Scholar

Goemans, Henk E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leaders.” Journal of Peace research 46, 2: 269–283.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2012. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia. 1998. “The economist as detective.” In Szenberg, Michael (ed.), Passion and Craft: Economists at Work (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), 98–112.Google Scholar

Goldstone, Jack A. 1991. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gooding, David C. 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Gordon, David M. 1998. “Politics and precision: Pursuing economics outside the mainstream.” In Szenberg, Michael (ed.), Passion and Craft: Economists at Work (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), 113–132.Google Scholar

Gray, Paul S., Williamson, John B., Karp, David A., Dalphin, John R.. 2007. The Research Imagination: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S.. 2002. “The downstream benefits of experimentation.” Political Analysis 10, 4: 394–402.Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., Ha, Shang E., Bullock, John G.. 2010. “Enough already about ‘black box’ experiments: Studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628: 200–208.Google Scholar

Griffin, Larry J. 1995. “How is sociology informed by history?” Social Forces 73, 4: 1245–1254.Google Scholar

Grønhaug, Kjell, Kaufmann, Geir (eds.) 1988. Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, Matthias, McGoey, Linsey (eds.) 2015. Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gross, Neil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grosul, Maya, Feist, Gregory J.. 2014. “The creative person in science.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8, 1: 30–43.Google Scholar

Gruber, Howard E. 1974. Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Gruber, Howard E. 1989. “The evolving systems approach to creative work.” In Wallace, Doris B. and Gruber, Howard E. (eds.), Creative People at Work: Twelve Cognitive Case Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–24.Google Scholar

Gruber, Howard E., Bödeker, Katja (eds.) 2005. Creativity, Psychology and the History of Science. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Gutzkow, Joshua, Lamont, Michèle, Mallard, Grégoire. 2004. “What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences?” American Sociological Review 69: 190–212.Google Scholar

Hadenius, Axel, Teorell, Jan. 2007. “Pathways from authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18, 1: 143–157.Google Scholar

Hage, Jerald. 1972. Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert. 2012. “Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule.” American Political Science Review 106: 1–22.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, Daniel S. 2018. “Citations in economics: measurement, uses and impacts.” Journal of Economic Literature 56, 1: 115–156.Google Scholar

Hammond, Phillip (ed.) 1967. Sociologists at Work. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar

Haney, C., Banks, C., Zimbardo, P.. 1973. “Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison.” International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1: 69–97.Google Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harcourt, Geoffrey Colin. 2016. Post-Keynesian Essays in Biography: Portraits of Twentieth-Century Political Economists. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Harding, David J., Fox, Cybelle, Mehta, Jal D.. 2002. “Studying rare events through qualitative case studies: Lessons from a study of rampage school shootings.” Sociological Methods and Research 11, 31: 174–217.Google Scholar

Harris, Marvin. 1974. Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches: The Riddles of Culture. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Hartwig, Frederick, Dearing, Brian E.. 1979. Exploratory Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Harzing, Anne-Wil. 2007. Publish or Perish. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research.Google Scholar

Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haynes, Barton F., Pantaleo, Giuseppe, Fauci, Anthony S.. 1996. “Toward an understanding of the correlates of protective immunity to HIV infection.” Science 271: 324–328.Google Scholar

Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Fuck nuance.” Sociological Theory 35, 2: 118–127.Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter, Swedberg, Richard (eds.) 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heemskerk, Marieke. 2002. “Livelihood decision making and environmental degradation: Small-scale gold mining in the Suriname Amazon.” Society and Natural Resources 15: 327–344.Google Scholar

Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael (eds.) 2001. Political Corruption: Concepts & Contexts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heilbroner, Robert L. 2011. The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., Oppenheim, Paul. 1948. “Studies in the logic of explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15, 2: 135–175.Google Scholar

Hempel, Sandra. 2007. The Strange Case of the Broad Street Pump: John Snow and the Mystery of Cholera. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hesli, Vicki L., Lee, Jae Mook. 2011. “Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others?” PS: Political Science & Politics 44: 393–408.Google Scholar

Hesli, Vicki L., DeLaat, Jacqueline, Youde, Jeremy, Mendez, Jeanette, Lee, Sang-shin. 2006. “Success in graduate school and after: Survey results from the Midwest region.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39, 2: 317–325.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Hidalgo, F. Daniel, Nichter, Simeon. 2016. “Voter buying: Shaping the electorate through clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 60, 2: 436–455.Google Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile. 2020. “Research creativity and productivity in political science: A research agenda for understanding alternative career paths and attitudes toward professional work in the profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53, 1: 79–83.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1967. Development Projects Observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2007. “Meanings of methodological individualism.” Journal of Economic Methodology 14, 2: 211–226.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Richard. 1963. Anti-intellectualism in American Life. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and causal inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 396: 945–960.Google Scholar

Holmes, Frederic Lawrence. 2004. Investigative Pathways. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Homans, George C. 1958. “Social behavior as exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 65: 597–606.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Tamara, Massey, Gerald (eds.) 1991. Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Howard, Christopher. 2017. Thinking Like a Political Scientist: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Howitt, Susan M., Wilson, Anna N.. 2014. “Revisiting ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud?”’ EMBO Reports 15, 5: 481–484.Google Scholar

Hoy, David Couzens. 1982. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Macartan. 2016. Political Games. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Hutchison, Andrew John, Johnston, Lynne Halley, Breckon, Jeff David. 2010. “Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13, 4: 283–302.Google Scholar

Hyde, Susan D. 2007. “The observer effect in international politics: Evidence from a natural experiment.” World Politics 60, 1: 37–63.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, Katerina, Roux, Sophie (eds.) 2011. Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. “Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies.” American Political Science Review 105, 4: 765–789.Google Scholar

Imbens, Guido W., Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. “Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142, 2: 615–635.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irvine, William Braxton. 2015. Aha! The Moments of Insight that Shape Our World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Isaksen, Scott G., Murdock, Mary C., Firestein, Roger L., Treffinger, D. J. (eds.) 1993. Understanding and Recognizing Creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Iyer, Lakshmi. 2010. “Direct versus indirect colonial rule in India: Long-term consequences.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 92, 4: 693–713.Google Scholar

Jackson, Michelle, Cox, David R.. 2013. “The principles of experimental design and their application in sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 27–49.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Alan. 2020. “Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research.” In Elman, Colin, Gerring, John, Mahoney, James (eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 221–264.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Struan. 2006. “Models of scientific community: Charles Sanders Peirce to Thomas Kuhn.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31, 2: 163–173.Google Scholar

James, Gareth, Witten, Daniela, Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. 1967. The Jefferson Cyclopedia. Vol. 1. Foley, John P. (ed.), New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar

Jenicek, Milos. 2001. Clinical Case Reporting in Evidence-Based Medicine, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jodha, N. S. 1995. “Studying common property resources: Biography of a research project.” Economic and Political Weekly 30, 11: 556–559.Google Scholar

Johnson, Chalmers. 1983. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jeremy B. 2018. “Protecting the community: Lessons from the Montana Flyer Project.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51, 3: 615–619.Google Scholar

Johnson, Steven. 2006. The Ghost Map: The Story of London’s Most Terrifying Epidemic and How It Changed Science, Cities, and the Modern World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Johnson, Steven. 2010. Where Good Ideas Come from: The Seven Patterns of Innovation. London: Penguin UK.Google Scholar

John-Steiner, Vera. 2000. Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joyner, Randy L., Rouse, William A., Glatthorn, Allan A.. 2018. Writing the Winning Thesis or Dissertation: A Step-by-Step Guide. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar

Kagel, John H., Roth, Alvin E. (eds.) 2016. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana, McLean, Lauren, Read, Benjamin. 2015. Field Research in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Geir. 1988. “Problem solving and creativity.” In Grønhaug, Kjell, Kaufmann, Geir (eds.), Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 87–137.Google Scholar

Kaufman, James C., Beghetto, Ronald A.. 2009. “Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13, 1: 1–12.Google Scholar

Kaufman, James C., Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.) 2010. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kauffman, Stuart A. 2000. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kazancigil, Ali. 1994. “The deviant case in comparative analysis: High stateness in comparative analysis.” In Dogan, Mattei, Kazancigil, Ali (eds.), Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance (Cambridge: Blackwell), 213–238.Google Scholar

Kellstedt, Paul M., Whitten, Guy D.. 2018. The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelman, Herbert C. 1982. “Ethical issues in different social science methods.” In Beauchamp, Tom L., Faden, Ruth R., Jay Wallace, R., Jr., Walters, LeRoy (eds.), Ethical Issues in Social Science Research (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 40–98.Google Scholar

Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A.. 1950. “The law of cubic proportion in election results.” British Journal of Sociology 1: 183–197.Google Scholar

Kendall, Patricia L., Wolf, Katherine M.. 1949/1955. “The analysis of deviant cases in communications research.” In Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Stanton, Frank N. (eds.), Communications Research, 1948–1949 (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1949). Reprinted in Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Rosenberg, Morris (eds.), The Language of Social Research (New York: Free Press, 1995), 167–170.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert. 2009. “Political science as a vocation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42, 2: 359–363.Google Scholar

Key, V. O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Kim, Hannah June, Grofman, Bernard. 2019. “The political science 400: With citation counts by cohort, gender, and subfield.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52, 2: 296–311.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 1996. World Economic Primacy 1500–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kirk, Dudley. 1996. “Demographic transition theory.” Population Studies 50, 3: 361–387.Google Scholar

Kirton, Michael J. (ed.) 1994. Adapters and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klein, Gary. 2013. Seeing What Others Don’t: The Remarkable Ways We Gain Insights. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Klein, Lawrence R., Ozmucur, Suleyman. 2003. “The estimation of China’s growth rate.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 28, 4: 187–202.Google Scholar

Knoke, David, Yang, Song. 2019. Social Network Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Møller, Jørgen, Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2016. “Going historical: Measuring democraticness before the age of mass democracy.” International Political Science Review 37, 5: 679–689.Google Scholar

Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kohn, Melvin L. 1993. “Doing social research under conditions of radical social change: The biography of an ongoing research project.” Social Psychology Quarterly 56, 1: 4–20.Google Scholar

Kollman, Ken, Hicken, Allen, Caramani, Daniele, Backer, David, Lublin, David. 2018. Constituency-Level Elections Archive. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Kregel, J. A. (ed.) 1988. Recollections of Eminent Economists, Vol I. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kregel, J. A. (ed.) 1989. Recollections of Eminent Economists, Vol II. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Krieger, Susan. 1991. Social Science and the Self: Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 1998. “How I work.” In Szenberg, Michael (ed.), Passion and Craft: Economists at Work (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), 143–154.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970[1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuznets, Simon. 1955. “Economic growth and income inequality.” American Economic Review 45: 1–28.Google Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lalonde, Robert J. 1986. “Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data.” American Economic Review 76, 4: 604–620.Google Scholar

Landes, William M. 1998. “The art of law and economics: An autobiographical essay.” In Szenberg, Michael (ed.), Passion and Craft: Economists at Work (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), 155–175.Google Scholar

Lange, Matthew. 2009. Lineages of Despotism and Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Langley, Pat, Simon, Herbert A., Bradshaw, Gary L., Mytkow, Jan M.. 1987. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Langton, Christopher G. 1992. “Life at the edge of chaos.” Proc. Workshop on Artificial Life 10: 41–91.Google Scholar

Larivière, Vincent, Chaoqun, Ni, Gingras, Yves, Cronin, Blaise, Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2013. “Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science.” Nature News 504, 7479: 211.Google Scholar

Larkin, Jill H., Simon, Herbert A.. 1987. “Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.” Cognitive Science 11, 1: 65–100.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1981. “Why was the logic of discovery abandoned?” In Science and Hypothesis. (Dordrecht: Springer), 181–191.Google Scholar

Lave, Charles, March, James. 1975. An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Barton, Allen H.. 1951. “Qualitative measurement in the social sciences: Classification, typologies, and indices.” In Lerner, Daniel, Lasswell, Harold D. (eds.), The Policy Sciences (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 155–192.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned, Schouten, Peer, Suganami, Hidemi (eds.) 2016. The Return of the Theorists: Dialogues with Great Thinkers in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lee, Sooho, Bozeman, Barry. 2005. “The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity.” Social Studies of Science 35, 5: 673–702.Google Scholar

LeGates, Richard T. 2005. Think Globally, Act Regionally: GIS and Data Visualization for Social Science and Public Policy Research. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Jonah. 2012. Imagine: How Creativity Works. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Lei, Simon A. 2009. “Strategies for finding and selecting an ideal thesis or dissertation topic: A review of literature.” College Student Journal 43, 4: 1324+.Google Scholar

Lemert, Charles (ed.) 2018. Social Theory: The Multicultural, Global, and Classic Readings. New York:RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Lemkin, Raphael. 1944. Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Washington, DC: Carnegie.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret. 1999. “Producing an analytic narrative.” In Bowen, John R., Petersen, Roger (eds.), Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 152–172.Google Scholar

Levin, Sharon G., Stephan, Paula E.. 1991. “Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists.” American Economic Review 82, 1: 114–131.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Levitt, Steven D., Dubner, Stephen J.. 2005. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Levitt, Steven D., Dubner, Stephen J.. 2009. Superfreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Levitt, Steven D., Dubner, Stephen J.. 2015. Think Like a Freak: The Authors of Freakonomics Offer to Retrain Your Brain. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael. 2016. The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed the World. London: Penguin UK.Google Scholar

Lichbach, Mark Irving, Zuckerman, Alan S. (eds.) 1997. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lieberman, Evan S. 2016. “Can the biomedical research cycle be a model for political science?” Perspectives on Politics 14, 4: 1054–1066.Google Scholar

Lightman, Alan, Gingerich, Owen. 1992. “When do anomalies begin?” Science 255, 5045: 690–695.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative politics and the comparative method.” American Political Science Review 65: 682–693.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1975. “The comparable cases strategy in comparative research.” Comparative Political Studies 8: 158–177.Google Scholar

Linsley, E. G., Usinger, R. L.. 1959. “Linnaeus and the development of the international code of zoological nomenclature.” Systematic Zoology 8: 39–47.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J., Stepan, Alfred (eds.) 1978a. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J., Stepan, Alfred (eds.) 1978b. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, 1: 69–105.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1964. The Biography of a Research Project: Union Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1967. “The biography of a research project: Union democracy.” In Hammond, Phillip (ed.), Sociologists at Work. (New York: Doubleday & Company), 111–139.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, Trow, Martin A., Coleman, James S.. 1956. Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Little, Daniel. 1991. Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Westview.Google Scholar

Little, Daniel. 1998. Microfoundations, Method, and Causation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.Google Scholar

Locke, Edwin A. 2007. “The case for inductive theory building.” Journal of Management 33, 6: 867–890.Google Scholar

Loehle, Craig. 1990. “A guide to increased creativity in research: inspiration or perspiration?” Bioscience 40, 2: 123–129.Google Scholar

Loehle, Craig. 2009. Becoming a Successful Scientist: Strategic Thinking for Scientific Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lozano, George A., Larivière, Vincent, Gingras, Yves. 2012. “The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the Digital Age.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 11: 2140–2145.Google Scholar

Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lynd, Robert Staughton. 1964[1939]. Knowledge For What?: The Place of Social Science in American Culture. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Susan Peck, . 1994. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

MacNell, Lillian, Adam Driscoll, Andrea N. Hunt, . 2015. “What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching.” Innovative Higher Education 40: 291–303.Google Scholar

Magnani, Lorenzo, Nersessian, Nancy, Thagard, Paul (eds.) 1999. Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar