Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:25:55.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 29 - The perinatal postmortem examination

from Section 9 - Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Bidyut Kumar
Affiliation:
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Zarko Alfirevic
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Medicine , pp. 356 - 366
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Report of Joint Working Group, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and Perinatal Pathology. London: RCOG, 2001.Google Scholar
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Perinatal Mortality 2007. Dorchester UK: Dorset Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Burton, JL, Underwood, J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 2007; 369: 1471–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shojania, KG, Burton, EC, McDonald, KM, et al. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roulson, J, Benbow, EW, Hasleton, PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of postmortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005; 47: 5519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordijn, SJ, Erwich, JJHM, Khong, TY. Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 480–8.Google Scholar
Griffiths, PD, Variend, D, Evans, M, et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24(1): 22–7.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, JS, Singer, DB. Textbook of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology, 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell Science, 1998.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Kady, SM, McGeown, P, et al. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331(7525): 1113–7.Google Scholar
Gordijn, SJ, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY. The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 37.Google Scholar
McHaffie, HE. Crucial Decisions at the Beginning of Life. Parents’ experiences of treatment withdrawals from infants. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd, 2001.Google Scholar
Rahman, HA, Khong, TY. Survey of women’s reactions to perinatal necropsy. BMJ 1995; 310: 870–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDermott, M. The continuing decline of autopsies in clinical trials: is there any way back? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F198F199.Google Scholar
Cox, P, Marton, T. Pathological assessment of intrauterine growth restriction. BestPract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23: 751–64.Google Scholar
Cohen, MC, Blakey, S, Donn, T, et al. An audit of parents’/guardians’ wishes recorded after coronial autopsies in cases of sudden unexpected death in infancy: issues raised and future directions. MedSci Law 2009; 49: 179–84.Google Scholar
Royal College of Pathologists (RCPATH). Service specification for paediatric and perinatal histopathology. London: RCPATH, 1995. http://www.rcpath.org/publications-media/publications/service-specification-for-paediatric-and-perinatal-histopathologyGoogle Scholar
Fox, H, Sebire, NJ. Pathology of the Placenta, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007.Google Scholar
Heazell, AE, Martindale, EA. Can post-mortem examination of the placenta help determine the cause of stillbirth? J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29(3): 225–8.Google Scholar
Thayyil, S, Sebire, NJ, Chitty, LS, et al; MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013; 382(9888): 223–33.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(5): 513–8.Google Scholar
Cannie, M, Votino, C, Moerman, P, et al. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39(6): 659–65.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×