References
Abney, Drew H., Dale, Rick, Yoshimi, Jeff, Kello, Chris T., Tylén, Kristian, and Fusaroli, Ricardo (2014): “Joint Perceptual Decision-Making: A Case Study in Explanatory Pluralism”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 1–12.
Achinstein, Peter (1983): The Nature of Explanation, New York: Oxford University Press.
Acierno, Louis (1994): The History of Cardiology, London and New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.
Adams, Marcus (2009): “Empirical Evidence and the Knowledge-that/Knowledge-how Distinction”, Synthese, vol. 170, pp. 97–114.
Aird, W.C. (2011): “Discovery of the Cardiovascular System: From Galen to William Harvey”, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9 (Suppl. 1), pp. 118–129.
Albert, Hans (1968/1985): Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Albert, Hans (1978): Traktat über Rationale Praxis, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Albert, Hans (1982): Die Wissenschaft und die Fehlbarkeit der Vernunft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Albert, Hans (1987): Kritik der Reinen Erkenntnislehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Alt, James (2009): “Comment: Conditional Knowledge: An Oxymoron?” in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–153.
Anderson, John R. (2010): Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 7th edition, New York: Worth Publishers.
Arabatzis, Theodore (2006): “On the Inextricability of the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 215–230.
Axelrod, Robert (1986): “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms”, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, pp. 1095–1111.
Celsius, Aulus Cornelius (1935): De Medicina (On Medicine), vol. 1, Loeb Classical Library edition, translated by Spencer, W.G., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Baker, Alan (2012): “Science-Driven Mathematical Explanations”, Mind, vol. 121, pp. 243–267.
Bandura, Albert (1986): Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bargh, John A. and Chartrand, Tanya L. (1999): “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being”, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 462–479.
Barnes, Barry, Bloor, David, and Henry, John (1996): Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bartelborth, Thomas (2002): “Explanatory Unification”, Synthese, vol. 130, pp. 91–107.
Bartelborth, Thomas (2007): Erklären, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
Bartlett, Frederic (1932): Remembering, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batterman, Robert W. (2010): “On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 61, pp. 1–25.
Bechtel, William (2006): Discovering Cell Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bechtel, William (2008): Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience, London: Routledge.
Bechtel, William (2011): “Mechanism and Biological Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 533–557.
Bechtel, William and Abrahamsen, Adele (2005): “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 421–441.
Becker, Gary (1976): The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Becker, Gary and Posner, Richard (2009): Uncommon Sense: Economic Insights from Marriage to Terrorism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Bernholz, Peter, Streit, Manfred E. and Vaubel, Roland (1998): Political Competition, Innovation and Growth, Berlin: Springer.
Bible, Old Testament.
Binmore, Ken and Samuelson, Larry (1994): “An Economist’s Perspective on the Evolution of Norms”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 150, pp. 45–63.
Bird, Alexander (2005): “Explanation and Metaphysics”, Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 89–107.
Blaug, Marc (1997): Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bogen, Jim and Machamer, Peter (2011): “Mechanistic Information and Causal Continuity”, in Illari, Phyllis McKay, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon (eds.): Causality in the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 845–864.
Boudon, Raymond (1974): Education, Opportunity and Social Inequlity, New York: Wiley.
Boyer, Pascal (2000): “Evolution of the Modern Mind and the Origins of Culture: Religious Concepts as a Limiting-Case”, in Carruthers, Peter and Chamberlain, Andrew (eds.): Evolution and the Human Mind. Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–112.
Boyle, Robert (1688): A Disquisition About the Final Causes of Natural Things: Wherein It is Inquired, Whether, and, (if at all) with What Cautions a Naturalist Should Admit Them? London: John Caplot.
Brain, Peter (1986): Galen on Bloodletting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braine, David (1972): “Varieties of Necessity”, Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 46, pp. 139–170.
Braithwaite, Richard B. (1953): Scientific Explanation. A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandt, Karl (1993): Geschichte der Deutschen Volkswirtschaftslehre, vol. 2, Freiburg i. Br.: Rudolf Haufe Verlag.
Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James (1985): The Reason of Rules – Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, William F., Chinn, Clark A., and Samarapungavan, Ala (2000): “Explanation in Scientists and Children”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 279–298.
Bromberger, Sylvain (1966): “Why-Questions”, in Colodny, Robert (ed.): Mind and Cosmos, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 86–111.
Brown, Matthew J. (2013): “Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 80, pp. 829–839.
Buchanan, James (1975): The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon (1962): The Calculus of Consent – Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bueno, Otávio and French, Steven (2012): “Can Mathematics Explain Physical Phenomena?” British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 85–113.
Bueter, Anke (2015): “The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment”, Studies in History and philosophy of Science, Vol. 49, pp. 18–26.
Burkert, Walter (1999): “The Logic of Cosmogony”, in Buxton, Richard (ed.): From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–106.
Butterfield, Herbert (1957): The Origins of Modern Science 1300–1800, rev. edition, New York: Free Press.
Campbell, Donald T. (1965): “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution”, in Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W. (eds.): Social Change in Developing Areas, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, pp. 19–49.
Campbell, Donald T. (1974/1987): “Evolutionary Epistemology”, originally published in Schlipp, Paul A. (ed.): The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 413–463, and reprinted in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bartley, W.W. III (eds.) (1987): Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality and the Sociology of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 48–114.
Carey, Susan (1985): Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Carnap, Rudolf (1932): “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”, Erkenntnis, vol. 2, pp. 219–241.
Carrier, Martin (2013): “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladeness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude”, Science & Education, vol. 22, pp. 2547–2568.
Carruthers, Peter (2002): “The Roots of Scientific Reasoning: Infancy, Modularity and the Art of Trucking”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stich, Stephen, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–95.
Cartwright, Nancy (1999): The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cartwright, Nancy (2007): Hunting Causes and Using Them, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celsus, , On Medicine, Prooemium, Loeb Classical Library edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cesalpino, Andrea (1571): Peripateticarum Questionum, Libri Quinque, Venice: Apud Iuntas.
Cesalpino, Andrea (1593): Quaestionum Medicarum, Libri II, Venice: Apud Iuntas.
Cesalpino, Andrea (1606): Praxis Universae Artis Medicae, Treviso: Sumptibus Robert Meietti.
Chang, Hasok (2012): Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Berlin and New York: Springer.
Clark, Matthew (2012): Exploring Greek Myth, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cohen, Neal J. and Squire, Larry R. (1980): “Preserved Learning and Retention of Pattern-Analyzing Skill in Amnesia: Dissociation of Knowing How and Knowing That”, Science, vol. 210, pp. 207–210.
Coleman, James S. (1990a): Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, James S. (1990b): “The Emergence of Norms”, in Hechter, Michael, Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wippler, Reinhard (eds.): Social Institutions, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 35–59.
Colombo, Matteo and Hartmann, Stephan (2015): “Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advanced Access) published September 30, 2015.
Colombo, Matteo, Hartmann, Stephan, and van Iersel, Robert (2015): “Models, Mechanisms, and Coherence”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 181–212.
Colombo, Realdo (1559): De Re Anatomica, Libri XV, Venice: Nicolai Beuilacquae.
Coppola, Edward D. (1957): “The Discovery of the Pulmonary Circulation: A New Approach”, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 21, pp. 44–77.
Cosmides, Leda and John, Tooby (eds.) (1992): The Adapted Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cournot, Augustin (1838): Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris: Chez L. Hachette.
Craver, Carl (2007): Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crupi, Vincenzo and Tentori, Katya (2012): “A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems)”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 365–385.
Currie, Adrian Mitchell (2014): “Narratives, Mechanisms and Progress in Historical Science”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 1163–1183.
D’Andrade, Roy (1995): The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darden, Lindley (2006): Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Essays in Mechanisms, Interfield Relations and Anomaly Resolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2010): Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
Davidson, Janet E. and Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.) (2003): The Psychology of Problem Solving, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, Martin (2015): “Knowledge (Explicit, Implicit and Tacit): Philosophical Aspects”, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, vol. 13, London: Elsevier, pp. 74–90.
de Regt, Henk W. (2006): “Wesley Salmon’ s Complementarity Thesis: Causalism and Unificationism Reconciled?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, pp. 129–147.
Debru, Armelle (2008): “Anatomy”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–282.
Demeulenaere, Pierre (ed.) (2011): Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denzau, Arthur and North, Douglass C. (1994): “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions”, Kyklos, vol. 47, pp. 3–31.
Devitt, Michael (2011): “Methodology and the Nature of Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 108, pp. 205–218.
Díez, José, Kareem, Khalifa, and Bert, Leuridan (2013): “General Theories of Explanation: Buyer Beware”, Synthese, vol. 190, pp. 379–396.
Donald, Merlin (1991): The Origins of the Modern Mind. Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Douglas, Heather (2013): “The Value of Cognitive Values”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 796–806.
Dowe, Philip (2000): Physical Causation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downes, Anthony (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
Dupré, John (1993): The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eknoyan, Garabed and De Santo, Natale G. (1997): “Realdo Colombo (1516–1559). A Reappraisal”, American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 17, pp. 261–268.
Elster, Jon (1989a): The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon (1989b): “Social Norms and Economic Theory”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, pp. 99–107.
Elster, Jon (2007): Explaining Social Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epictetus, (1916): Epicteti Dissertationes ab Arriano digestae, ed. Schenkl, Heinrich, Leipzig: B.G.Teubner.
Fogan, Melinda Bonnie (2015): “Collaborative Explanation and Biological Mechanism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 67–78.
Fancy, Nahyan (2013): Science and Religion in Mamluk Egypt: Ibn al-Nafis, Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection, London and New York: Routledge.
Faucher, Luc, Mallon, Ron, Nazer, Daniel, Nichols, Shaun, Ruby, Aaron, Stich, Stephen, and Weinberg, Jonathan (2002): “The Baby in the Lab-Coat: Why Child Development Is Not an Adequate Model for Understanding the Development of Science”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stich, Stephen, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 335–362.
Faye, Jan (2012): After Postmodernism. A Naturalistic Reconstruction of the Humanities, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Faye, Jan (2014): The Nature of Scientific Thinking. On Interpretation, Explanation and Understanding, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ferguson, Adam (1792): Principles of Moral and Political Science, Edinburgh: W. Creech.
Feyerabend, Paul (1975/2010): Against Method, 4th edition, London and New York: Verso.
Files, Craig (1996): “Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance”, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36, pp. 398–412.
Fisher, George Jackson (1880): “Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendente”, Annals of Anatomy and Surgery, pp. 373–379.
Fodor, Jerry (1983): The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Franklin-Hall, Laura R. (2014): “High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published December 18, 2014.
Frede, Michael (ed.) (1985): Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Frede, Michael (1987): “On the Method of the So-Called Methodical School of Medicine”, in Frede, Michael (ed.): Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–278 [originally published in Barnes, Jonathan, Brunschwig, Jacques, Burnyeat, Myles, and Schofield, Malcolm (eds.) (1982): Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23].
Frege, Gottlob (1893/1998): Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
Friedman, Michael (1974): “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, pp. 5–19.
Friedman, Michael (2001): Dynamics of Reason, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Friedman, Michael (2002): “Kant, Kuhn and the Rationality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 171–190.
Friedman, Michael (2011): “Extending the Dynamics of Reason”, Erkenntnis, vol. 75, pp. 431–444.
Friedman, Michael (2012): “Reconsidering the Dynamics of Reason: Response to Ferrari Mormann, Nordmann, and Uebel”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 43, pp. 47–53.
Fries, Jakob Friedrich (1828–1831): Neue oder anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft, vols. 1–3, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Christian Friedrich Winter.
Frigg, Roman and Hunter, Matthew (eds.) (2010): Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Representation in Art and Science, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer.
Fullbrook, Edward (ed.) (2008): Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critiques, London: Routledge.
Furley, David. J. and Wilkie, J.S. (1984): Galen on Respiration and the Arteries, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gentner, Dedre and Gentner, Donald R. (1983): “Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity”, in Gentner, Dedre and Stevens, Albert (eds.): Mental Models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 99–129.
Gervais, Raoul (2014): “A Framework for Inter-Level Explanations: Outlines for a New Explanatory Pluralism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 1–9.
Giere, Ronald (1996): “The Scientist as Adult”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 538–541.
Giere, Ronald (2004): “How Models are Used to Represent Reality”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 742–752.
Giere, Ronald (2006): Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2008): “Why Heuristics Work”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 3, pp. 20–29.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter, and the ABC Research Group (1999): Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hertwig, Ralph, and Pachur, Thorsten (eds.) (2011): Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gijsbers, Victor (2007): “Why Unification is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 74: pp. 481–500.
Glennan, Stuart (2002): “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 342–353.
Glennan, Stuart (2010): “Ephemeral Mechanisms and Historical Explanation”, Erkenntnis, vol. 72, pp. 251–266.
Glymour, Clark (2015): “Probability and the Explanatory Virtues”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 591–604.
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2003): Theory and Reality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goodman, Nelson (1976): Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
Gopnik, Alison (1996a): “The Scientist as Child”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 485–514.
Gopnik, Alison (1996b): “Reply to Commentators”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 552–561.
Gopnik, Alison (2000): “Explanation as Orgasm and the Drive for Causal Knowledge: The Function, Evolution, and Phenomenology of the Theory Formation System”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 299–323.
Gopnik, Alison (2012): “Scientific Thinking in Young Children: Theoretical Advances, Empirical Research, and Policy Implications”, Science, vol. 337 (no. 6102), pp. 1623–1627.
Gopnik, Alison and Meltzhoff, Andrew (1998): Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gossen, Hermann Heinrich (1854): Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln, Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.
Grantham, Todd A. (1999): “Explanatory Pluralism in Paleobiology”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. S223–S236.
Grantham, Todd A. (2004): “Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Sciences”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 133–155.
Greenberg, Gabriel (2013): “Beyond Resemblance”, Philosophical Review, vol. 122, pp. 215–287.
Grimm, Stephen R. (2008): “Explanatory Inquiry and the Need for Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 59, pp. 481–497.
Hacking, Ian (2002): Historical Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Halonen, Ilpo and Hintikka, Jaako (2005): “Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 5–61.
Hankinson, Robert J. (2008): “The Man and His Work”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.
Harbecke, Jens (2010): “Mechanistic Constitution in Neurobiological Explanations”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 24 (3), pp. 267–285.
Harman, Gilbert (1965): “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, Philosophical Review, pp. 88–95.
Harvey, William (1628/1989): Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, English translation by Willis, Robert in The Works of Harvey, William, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1955): “Degrees of Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 6, pp. 209–225.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1967): “The Theory of Complex Phenomena”, in von Hayek, Friedrich A.: Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 22–42.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1982): Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 volumes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.) (1996): Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helmreich, G. (1907–1909): Galeni. De Usu Partium Libri XVII, Leipzig: Teubner.
Hempel, Carl G. (1965): Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: The Free Press.
Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul (1948): “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, 135–175 [Reprinted in Hempel (1965)].
Herfeld, Catherine (2012): The Many Faces of Rational Choice Theory, Ph.D. Dissertation, Witten/Herdecke University.
Herrick, James Bryan (1942): A Short History of Cardiology, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Hesiod, : Theogony, Penguin Classics, London.
Hey, Spencer Phillips (2014): “Heuristics and Meta-Heuristics in Scientific Judgment”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published December 24, 2014.
Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendendte (1603): De Venarum Ostiolis, facsimile edition, English translation by Franklin, K.J., , D.M., 1933, Springfeld, IL, and Baltimore, MD: Charles C. Thomas.
Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard, and Thagard, Paul (1986): Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hull, David (1988): Science as a Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Humphreys, Paul. (1981): “Aleatory Explanation”, Synthese, 48, pp. 225–232.
Humphreys, Paul (1989): The Chances of Explanation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hutchins, Edwin and Brian, Hazlehurst (1992): “Learning in the Culture Process”, in Langdon, Christopher G., Taylor, Charles, Doyne Farmer, J., and Steen, Rasmussen (eds.): Artificial Life II, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 689–706.
Iskandar, A.Z. (ed.) (1988): Galeni De Optimo Medico Cognoscendo, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, Suppl. Or. IV [Arabic], Berlin: Berlin-Bradenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip (1992): “In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 8, pp. 1–21.
Jaffé, William (ed.) (1965): Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, vol. II, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Jansson, Lina (2014): “Causal Theories of Explanation and the Challenge of Explanatory Disagreement”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 332–348.
Jevons, William Stanley (1871): The Theory of Political Economy, London and New York: MacMillan & Co.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (1983): Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (2006): How We Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, Eric L. (2003): The European Miracle, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (2000): “Explaining Explanation”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–18.
Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (2006): “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”, in Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (eds.): Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxix.
Keuth, Herbert (1993): Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung. Zur Kritik der kritischen Theorie, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Key, Jack D., Keys, Thomas E., and Callahan, John A. (1979): “Historical Development of Concept of Blood Circulation”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 43, pp. 1026–1032.
Khalifa, Kareem (2012): “Inaugurating Understanding or Repackaging Explanation?” Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 15–37.
Khan, Ijaz A., Daya, Samantapudi K., and Gowda, Ramesh M. (2005): “Evolution of the Theory of Circulation”, International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, pp. 519–521.
Kitcher, Philip (1981): “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 251–281.
Kitcher, Philip (1985): “Two Approaches to Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, pp. 632–639.
Kitcher, Philip (1989): “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.): Scientific Explanation, volume 13 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.
Kitcher, Philip (1993): The Advancement of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, Philip (2001): Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, Philip (2011a): The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kitcher, Philip (2011b): Science in a Democratic Society, New York: Prometheus Books.
Kitcher, Philip and Varzi, Achille (2000): “Some Pictures Are Worth 2N0 Sentences”, Philosophy, vol. 75, pp. 377–381.
Knight, Jack (2009): “Causal Mechanisms and Generalizations”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–184.
Koertge, Noretta (1992): “Explanation and Its Problems”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 43, pp. 85–98.
Koethe, John (2002): “Stanley and Williamson on Knowing How”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 325–328.
Kühn, Carl Gottlob (ed.) (1821–1833): Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, Leipzig: C. Cnobloch, rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964–1965.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962/1970): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second enlarged edition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas (1977): “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in Kuhn, Thomas: The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–339.
Kybourg, Henry E. (1965): “Comment”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 32, 147–151.
Lange, Marc (2013): “What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. 485–511.
Lange, Marc (2014): “Aspects of Mathematical Explanation: Symmetry, Unity, and Salience”, Philosophical Review, vol. 123, pp. 485–531.
Larkin, Jill H. and Simon, Herbert (1987): “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words”, Cognitive Science, vol. 11, pp. 65–99.
Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems. Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Laudan, Larry (1984): Science and Values, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Laudan, Larry (2004): “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social”, in: Peter, Machamer and Gereon, Wolters (eds.): Science, Values, and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 14–23.
Lawson, Tony (1997): Economics and Reality, London: Routledge.
Lawson, Tony (2003): Reorienting Economics, London: Routledge.
Lewis, David (1986): “Causal Explanation”, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–240.
Lipton, Peter (2004): Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition, London and New York: Routledge.
Little, Daniel (2009): “The Heterogeneous Social: New Thinking About the Foundations of the Social Sciences”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–178.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (2008): “Galen and His Contemporaries”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–48.
Longino, Helen (1990): Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, Helen (2002): The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Longino, Helen (2013): Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lorenz, Konrad (1941): “Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie”, Blätter für deutsche Philosophie, vol. 15 (1), pp. 95–124.
Lorenz, Konrad (1943): “Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung”, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 5, pp. 235–409.
Lorenz, Konrad (1965): Evolution and Modification of Behavior, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lorenz, Konrad (1973): Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlicher Erkennens, München and Zürich: Pieper.
Love, Alan C. (2015): “Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles, and Scientific Explaining in Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 88–94.
Lütge, Christoph (2001): Ökonomische Wissenschaftstheorie, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Lütge, Christoph (2004): “Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?” Synthese, vol. 140 (3), pp. 279–305.
Machamer, Peter (2009): “Explaining Mechanisms”, unpublished paper.
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000): “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 1–25.
Mäki, Uskali (2001): “Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 31, pp. 488–506.
Mäki, Uskali (2002): “Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 2: Explanatory Ecumenism and Economics Imperialism”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 235–257.
Mäki, Uskali and Marchionni, Caterina (2009): “On the Structure of Explanatory Unification: The Case of Geographical Economics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 40, pp. 185–195.
Malpighi, Marcello (1661/1929): De Pulmonibus epistolae II ad Borellium, translated into English by Young, James: Malpighi’s “De Pulmonibus”, in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 1–11.
Malthus, Thomas Robert (1814): Observations on the Effects of Corn Laws on the Agriculture and General Wealth of the Country, London: J. Johnson & Co.
Mantzavinos, C. (1994): Wettbewerbstheorie. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Mantzavinos, C. (1999): “Carl Menger und die Wettbewerbstheorie”, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, vol. 219, pp. 685–691.
Mantzavinos, C. (2001): Individuals, Institutions and Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mantzavinos, C. (2005): Naturalistic Hermeneutics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mantzavinos, C. (2007): “Interpreting the Rules of the Game”, in Engel, Christoph and Strack, Fritz (eds.): The Impact of Court Procedure on the Psychology of Judicial Decision Making, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 13–30.
Mantzavinos, C. (ed.) (2009): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mantzavinos, C., Douglass, North, and Shariq, Syed (2004): “Learning, Institutions and Economic Performance”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, pp. 75–84.
Marchionni, Caterina (2008): “Explanatory Pluralism and Complementarity. From Autonomy to Integration”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 38, pp. 314–333.
Marshall, Alfred (1890/1920): Principles of Economics, 8th edition, London: MacMillan.
Mattern, Susan P. (2008): Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Mayer, Richard E. (1992): Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition, 2nd edition, New York: W.H. Freeman.
McAdams, Richard (1997): “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms”, Michigan Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 338–433.
McCauley, Robert (2000): “The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of Science”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 61–85.
McCauley, Robert (2009): “Time is of the Essence: Explanatory Pluralism and Accommodating Theories About Long Term Processes”, Philosophical Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 611–635.
McCauley, Robert (2013): “Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Or Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying About Reductive Elimination of the Religious and Why Cognitive Science Poses No Threat to Religious Studies”, Working Paper.
McCauley, Robert and Bechtel, William (2001): “Explanatory Pluralism and Heuristic Identity Theory”, Theory and Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 736–760.
McMullen, Emerson Thomas (1995): “Anatomy of a Physiological Discovery: William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood”, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 88, pp. 491–498.
McMullin, Ernan (1983/2012): “Values in Science”, in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 182, vol. Two: Symposia and Invited Papers, and reprinted in Zygon, vol. 47, pp. 686–709.
McMullin, Ernan (2008): “The Virtues of a Good Theory”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 498–508.
Menger, Carl (1871/1968): Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller, and 2nd edition 1968 by von Hayek, Friedrich A.: Carl Menger: Gesammelte Werke, Band I, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Menger, Carl (1976): Principles of Economics, translated by Dingwall, James and Hoselitz, Bert F., Arlington, VA: The Institue for Humane Studies.
Meyerhof, Max (1935): “Ibn An-Nafis (XIIIth cent.) and His Theory of the Lesser Circulation”, Isis, vol. 23, pp. 100–120.
Mill, John Stuart (1843/1974): A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive, vol. VII of the Collected Works of Mill, John Stuart, ed., Robson, J.M. and McRae, R.F., Toronto: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mill, John Stuart (1848/1909): Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, 7th edition, London: Longmans Green and Co.
Mitchell, Sandra (2003): Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, Sandra (2009a): Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, Sandra (2009b): “Complexity and Explanation in the Social Sciences”, in: Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–145.
Mithen, Steven (1996): The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science, New York: Thames and Hudson.
Mithen, Steven (2002): “Human Evolution and the Cognitive Basis of Sciences”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stephen, Stich, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–40.
Morrison, Margaret (2000): Unifying Scientific Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, Dennis (2003): Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, Ernst (1961): The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nathan, Marco J. (2015): “Unificatory Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published July 8, 2015.
Nee, Victor (1998): “Norms and Networks in Economic and Organizational Performance”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 88, pp. 85–89.
Nee, Victor and Ingram, Paul (1998): “Embeddedness and Beyond: Institutions, Exchange and Social Structure”, in Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary C. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 19–45.
Nee, Victor and Strang, David (1998): “The Emergence and Diffusion of Institutional Forms”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 154, pp. 706–715.
Nelson, Richard and Winter, Sidney (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nersessian, Nancy (1992): “How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science”, in Giere, Ronald (ed.): Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XV, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–44.
Nersessian, Nancy (2008a): Creating Scientific Concepts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nersessian, Nancy (2008b): “Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 391–416.
Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert (1972): Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Nickel, Bernhard (2010): “How General Do Theories of Explanation Need to Be?” Noûs, vol. 42, pp. 305–328.
Nickles, Thomas (2006): “Heuristic Appraisal: Context of Discovery or Justification?”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–182.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1887): Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift, Leigzig: Verlag C.G. Naumann.
Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980): Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
North, Douglass C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, Robert (1994): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 84, pp. 314–318.
Nutton, Vivian (2004): Ancient Medicine, London: Routledge.
Nutton, Vivian (2008): “The Fortunes of Galen”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 355–390.
Olson, Mancur (1965): The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Malley, Charles Donald (1970): “The Lure of Padua”, Medical History, vol. 14, pp.1–9.
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1979): “The Emergence and Effects of Social Norms. A Confrontation of Some Hypotheses of Sociology and Economics”, Kyklos, vol. 32, pp. 775–801.
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1982): “The Evolutionary Emergence of Norms”, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 139–149.
Ott, Alfred E. and Winkel, Harald (1985): Geschichte der theoretischen Volkswirtschaftslehre, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Overton, James A. (2013): “‘Explain’ in Scientific Discourse”, Synthese, vol. 190, pp. 1383–1405.
Palmieri, Paolo (2012): “Signals, Cochlear Mechanics and Pragmatism: A New Vista on Human Hearing?”, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 527–548.
Papineau, David (2009): “Physicalism and the Human Sciences”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–123.
Perini, Laura (2005a): “The Truth in Pictures”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 262–285.
Perini, Laura (2005b): “Visual Representations and Confirmation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 913–926.
Perini, Laura (2005c): “Explanation in Two Dimensions: Diagrams and Biological Explanation”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 20, pp. 257–269.
Perini, Laura (2013): “Diagrams in Biology”, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 28, pp. 273–286.
Petkov, Stefan (2015): “Explanatory Unification and Conceptualization”, Synthese, vol. 192, pp. 3695–3717.
Piaget, Jean (1936): La Naissance de l’ Intelligence chez l’Enfant, Neuchatel and Paris: Delachau et Niestle.
Pincock, Christopher (2012): Mathematics and Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pincock, Christopher (2015): “Abstract Explanations in Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 857–882.
Plutynski, Anya (2004): “Explanation in Classical Population Genetics”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 1201–1214.
Polanyi, Michael (1958): Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R. (1934): Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Springer, Imprint 1935, actually published 1934.
Popper, Karl R. (1949): “Naturgesetze und theoretische Systeme,” in Moser, Simon (ed.): Gesetze und Wirklichkeit, Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag, pp. 43–60.
Popper, Karl R. (1957): “The Aim of Science”, Ratio, I, pp. 24–35 [and reprinted in Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, rev. edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979, pp. 191–205].
Popper, Karl R. (1958/1989): “Back to the Presocratics”, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N.S. vol. 59, and reprinted in: Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5th revised edition, London: Routledge, pp. 136–165.
Popper, Karl R. (1959/2002): The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R. (1963/1989): Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5th revised edition, London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R. (1970): “Normal Science and Its Dangers”, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–58.
Popper, Karl R. (1972/1992): Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, Karl R. (1987): “Die erkenntnistheoretische Position der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie”, in Riedl, Rupert and Wuketits, Franz (eds.): Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Bedingungen. Lösungen. Kontroversen, Berlin: Parcy.
Popper, Karl R. and Eccles, John C. (1977/1983): The Self and Its Brain. An Argument for Interactionism, London: Routledge.
Posner, Richard (2010): Economic Analysis of Law, 8th edition, New York: Aspen Publishers.
Potochnik, Angela (2010): “Levels of Explanation Reconceived”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 59–72.
Prioreschi, Plinio (2004): “Andrea Cesalpino and Systemic Circulation”, Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises, vol. 62, pp. 382–400.
Psillos, Stathis (2002): Causation and Explanation, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Psillos, Stathis (2007): “Past and Contemporary Perspectives on Explanation”, in Kuipers, Theo (ed.): Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Focal Issues, Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 97–174.
Railton, Peter (1978): “A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 206–226.
Railton, Peter (1981): “Probability, Explanation and Information”, Synthese, vol. 48, pp. 233–256.
Reutlinger, Alexander (2014): “Why Is There Universal Macrobehavior? Renormalization Group Explanation as Noncausal Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 1157–1170.
Ricardo, David (1817/1951): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, ed. Sraffa, Pierro, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, Collin (2015): “Moving Beyond Causes: Optimality Models and Scientific Explanation”, Noûs, vol. 49, pp. 589–615.
Richardson, Alan W. (2006): “The Many Unities of Science: Politics, Semantics, and Ontology”, in Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (eds.): Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–25.
Rocca, Julius (2008): “Anatomy”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–262.
Rogers, Brian and Cassandra, Rogers (2009): “Visual Globes, Celestial Spheres, and the Perception of Straight and Parallel Lines”, Perception, vol. 38, pp. 1295–1312.
Rosefeld, Tobias (2004): “Is Knowing-how Simply a Case of Knowing-that?” Philosophical Investigations, vol. 27, pp. 370–379.
Roth, Moritz (1892): Andreas Vesalius Bruxellensis, Berlin: George Reimer.
Ruben, David-Hillel (2012): Explaining Explanation, 2nd edition, Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.
Ruphy, Stéphanie (2011): “From Hacking’s Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to ‘Foliated Pluralism’: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 1212–1222.
Russell, Bertrand (1912): “On the Notion of Cause”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, vol. 13, pp. 1–26.
Ryle, Gilbert (1949): The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin Books.
Saatsi, Juha and Pexton, Mark (2013): “Reassessing Woodward’s Account of Explanation: Regularities, Counterfactuals, and Noncausal Explanations”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 613–624.
Salmon, Wesley (1970): “Statistical Explanation”, in Colodny, Robert G. (ed.): The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 173–231. [Reprinted in Salmon, Wesley (1971): Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 29–87.]
Salmon, Wesley (1984): Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Salmon, Wesley (1990): Four Decades of Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Salmon, Wesley (1998): Causality and Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Samarapungavan, Ala (1992): “Children’s Judgments in Theory Choice Tasks: Scientific Rationality in Childhood”, Cognition, vol. 45, pp. 1–32.
Schank, Roger and Abelson, Robert (1977): Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schiffer, Stephen (2002): “Amazing Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 200–202.
Schmid, Michael (2006): Die Logik mechanismischer Erklärungen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schrödinger, Erwin (1958): Mind and Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schupbach, Jonah N. and Sprenger, Jan (2011): “The Logic of Explanatory Power”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 105–127.
Schurz, Gerhard (1999): “Explanation as Unification”, Synthese, vol. 120, pp. 95–114.
Schurz, Gerhard and Lambert, Karel (1994): “Outline of a Theory of Scientific Understanding”, Synthese, vol. 101, pp. 65–120.
Servetus, Miguel (1553): Christianismi Restitutio, Vienne, English translation: The Restoration of Christianity, by Hoffmann, Christopher A. and Hiller, Marian, Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.
Sextus, Empiricus (1933): Outlines of Pyrrhonism, translated by Bury, R.G., Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sheredos, Benjamin, Daniel, Burnston, Adele, Abrahamsen and William, Bechtel (2013): “Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 931–944.
Shulman, Robert G. and Shapiro, Ian (2009): “Reductionism in the Human Sciences: A Philosopher’s Game”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–129.
Simon, Herbert (1992): “Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving”, in Egidi, Massimo and Marris, Robin (eds.): Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, Hants: Edward Elgar, pp. 102–119.
Simon, Herbert (2000): “Discovering Explanations”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–59.
Siraisi, Nancy (1981): Tadeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Skow, Bradford (2014): “Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events?)” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 65, pp. 445–467.
Skow, Bradford (2015): “Are There Genuine Physical Explanations of Mathematical Phenomena?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 69–93.
Smith, Adam (1759/1976): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Adam (1776/1976): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, Edwin, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Ryan (2014): “Explanation, Understanding, and Control”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 4169–4200.
Snellen, H.A. (1984): History of Cardiology, Rotterdam: Donker Academic Publications.
Sober, Elliott (1983): “Equilibrium Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 43, pp. 201–210.
Sober, Elliott (2002): “What is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner, Arnold, Keuzenbach, Hugo and McAleer, Michael (eds.): Simplicity, Inference and Econometric Modelling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–31.
Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean (1997): Les Impostures Intellectuelles, Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
Staden, Heinrich von (1995): “Anatomy as Rhetoric: Galen on Dissection and Persuasion”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 47–66.
Stanley, Jason (2011): Know How, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy (2001): “Knowing How”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, pp. 411–444.
Steel, Daniel (2004): “Can a Reductionist Be a Pluralist?”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 19, pp. 55–73.
Steiner, Mark (1978a): “Mathematical Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 34, pp. 135–151.
Steiner, Mark (1978b): “Mathematics, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge”, Noûs, vol. 12, pp. 17–28.
Sterelny, Kim (1996): “Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 11, pp. 193–214.
Sterelny, Kim (2014): The Evolved Apprentice. How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press.
Streissler, Erich (1989): “Carl Menger”, in Starbatty, Joachim (ed.): Klassiker des ökonomischen Denkens, vol. II, München: Beck, pp. 118–127.
Strevens, Michael (2008): Depth. An Account of Scientific Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stump, David (1992): “Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 59, pp. 456–460.
Suárez, Mauricio (2004): “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 767–779.
Suárez, Mauricio (2015): “Deflationary Representation, Inference, and Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, pp. 36–47.
Sugden, Robert (1998): “Normative Expectations: The Simultaneous Evolution of Institutions and Norms”, in Ben-Ner, Avner and Putterman, Louis (eds.): Economics, Values, and Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–100.
Sun, Ron, Merrill, Edward, and Peterson, Todd (2001): “From Implicit Skills to Explicit Knowledge: A Bottom-Up Model of Skill Learning”, Cognitive Science, vol. 25, pp. 203–244.
Suppes, Patrick (1978): “The Plurality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers, pp. 3–16.
Teller, Paul (2008): “Representation in Science”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York, pp. 435–441.
Thagard, Paul (1988): Computational Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thagard, Paul (1996): Mind. An Introduction into Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thagard, Paul (2012): The Cognitive Science of Science. Explanation, Discovery and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thalos, Mariam (2002): “Explanation is a Genus: An Essay on the Varieties of Scientific Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 130, pp. 317–354.
Thiene, Gaetano (1997): “The Discovery of Circulation and the Origin of Modern Medicine during the Italian Renaissance”, Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 6 (2), March/April, pp. 79–88.
Thünen, Johann Heinrich (1842): Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, zweite erweiterte Ausgabe, Rostock: Leopold.
Topitsch, Ernst (1958): Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik. Eine Studie zur Weltanschauungskritik, Wien: Springer Verlag.
Trivers, Robert (1971): “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 46, pp. 45–57.
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1978): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, Synthese, vol. 39, pp. 263–291.
van Bouwel, Jeroen (2004): “Explanatory Pluralism in Economics: Against the Mainstream?” Philosophical Explorations, vol. 7, pp. 299–315.
van Bouwel, Jeroen and Weber, Erik (2008): “A Pragmatist Defense of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism in History and Social Science”, History and Theory, vol. 47, pp. 168–182.
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980): The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van Fraassen, Bas C. (2008): Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vesalius, Andreas (1538): Tabulae Anatomicae Sex, Venice.
Vesalius, Andreas (1543): De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, Basel: Johannes Oporinus, English Translation: On the Fabric of the Human Body, by William Frank Richardson and John Burd Carman, volume 5 containing Books VI: The Heart and Associated Organs and Book VI: The Brain, Novato CA: Norman Anatomy Series, No 5.
Vollmer, Gerhard (1975/2002): Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, 8th edition, Stuttgart: Hirzel.
Vosniadou, Stella and Brewer, William F. (1992): “Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood”, Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 535–585.
Vosniadou, Stella and Brewer, William F. (1994): “Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle”, Cognitive Science, vol. 18, pp. 123–183.
Vosniadou, Stella, Vamvakoussi, Xenia, and Skopeliti, Irini (2008): “The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 3–34.
Wallis, Charles (2008): “Consciousness, Context, and Know-How”, Synthese, vol. 160, pp. 123–153.
Walras, Leon (1874): Éléments d’Économie Politique Pure, ou Théorie de la Richesse Sociale, Lausanne: L. Corbaz & Cie.
Weatherall, James Owen (2011): “On (Some) Explanations in Physics”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 421–447.
Weber, Erik and van Bouwel, Jeroen (2002): “Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense with Structural Explanations of Social Facts?”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 259–275.
Weber, Erik, van Bouwel, Jeroen, and de Vreese, Leen (2013): Scientific Explanation, Heidelberg, New York and London: Springer.
Weber, Max (1985): Gesammelte Aufsätze für Wissenschaftslehre, 6th revised edition, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Weslake, Brad (2010): “Explanatory Depth”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 273–294.
Whitehead, Alfred N. (1911): An Introduction to Mathematics, London: Williams and Norgate.
Wiberg, Julius (1937): “The Medical Science of Ancient Greece: The Doctrine of the Heart”, Janus, vol. 41, pp. 225–254.
Wilkenfeld, Daniel A. (2014): “Functional Explaining. A New Approach to the Philosophy of Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 3367–3391.
Willius, Fredrick A. and Dry, Thomas J. (1948): A History of the Heart and the Circulation, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.
Wimsatt, William C. (1976): “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in Globus, G., Maxwell, G. and Savodnik, I. (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, New York: Plenum, pp. 202–267.
Wimsatt, William C. (2007): Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winter, Susan (2013): The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953): Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations, translated by Anscombe, G.E.M., Oxford: Blackwell.
Wong, Wai-hung and Zanja, Yudell (2015): “A Normative Account of the Need for Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 192, pp. 2863–2885.
Woodward, James (2000): “Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, pp. 197–254.
Woodward, James (2003): Making Things Happen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, James (2014): “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, DOI:10.1111/phpr.12095.
Woody, Andrea I. (2004): “More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals About Scientific Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 780–793.
Woody, Andrea I. (2015): “Re-orienting Discussions of Scentific Explanation: A Functional Perspective”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 79–87.
Wright, Cory (2015): “The Ontic Conception of Scientific Explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 54, pp. 20–30.
Ylikoski, Petri and Kuorikoski, Jaako (2010): “Dissecting Explanatory Power”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 148, pp. 201–219.
