Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2019
  • Online publication date: March 2019

7 - The General Claims Commission (Mexico/US) and the Invention of International Responsibility

from Part III - Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms
Barker, C. (ed.), The Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal (Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2007), 8086.
Borchard, E., ‘Recent Opinions of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico’ (1931) 25(4) American Journal of International Law 735740.
Bordin, F. L., ‘Reflections on Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 535567.
Crawford, J. R., and Grant, T., ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to Foreigners’ in Grant, J. P. and Barker, J. Craig (eds.), The Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal (Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2007).
Corten, O., and Klein, P., ‘La Commission du droit international comme agent de la formalisation du droit de la responsabilité’ in Alland, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O. and Vinuales, J. (eds.), Unity and Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014), 415.
De Beus, J. G., The Jurisprudence of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico, under the Convention of September 8, 1923 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1938).
Fehr, J. C., ‘International Law as Applied by U.S.-Mexico Claims Commission’ (1928) 14 American Bar Association Journal 312.
Hunt, B. L., ‘Work of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico’ (1937) 3 Federal Bar Association Journal 83.
Juliard, P., ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Jansen, N., The Making of Legal Authority. Non-legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Nissel, A., ‘The Duality of State Responsibility’ (2013) 44 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 793.
Nolte, G., ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1083, esp. 1084–1086.
Scott, J. B., ‘The Settlement of Outstanding Claims between Mexico and the United States’ (1924) 18 American Journal of International Law 315.
Shabtai, R. (ed.), The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility, Part 1, Articles 1–35 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).
Spiermann, O., International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice, The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 41ff.
Spiermann, O., ‘“Who Attempts too Much Does Nothing Well”: The 1920 Advisory Committee of Jurists and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (2002) 73 British Yearbook of International Law 187260.
Stuyt, A. M., The General Principles of Law as Applied by International Tribunals to Disputes on Attribution and Exercise of State Jurisdiction (Berlin: Springer, 1946).
Van Vollenhoven, C., et al.General Claims Commission – United States and Mexico: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. United Mexican States’ (1926) 20(4) American Journal of International Law 794799.
Woolsey, L. H., ‘Settlement of Claims between the United States and Mexico’ (1936) 30 American Journal of International Law 99.