Book contents
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I International Adjudication
- 1 Experiments in International Adjudication
- 2 The Turn to the History of International Adjudication
- Part II Experiments in Dispute-Specific Adjudication
- Part III Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms
- Part IV The Quest for a Permanent Court
- Part V Experiments in Specialised Courts
- Index
- References
1 - Experiments in International Adjudication
Past and Present
from Part I - International Adjudication
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2019
Book contents
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Experiments in International Adjudication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I International Adjudication
- 1 Experiments in International Adjudication
- 2 The Turn to the History of International Adjudication
- Part II Experiments in Dispute-Specific Adjudication
- Part III Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms
- Part IV The Quest for a Permanent Court
- Part V Experiments in Specialised Courts
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in International AdjudicationHistorical Accounts, pp. 11 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Select Bibliography
Auslin, M., Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Barnidge, R. P., ‘Palestinian Engagement with the International Criminal Court: From Preliminary Examination to Investigation?’ (2016) 7 The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basdevant, J., ‘L’action coercitive Anglo-Germano–Italienne’ (1904) 12 Revue générale de droit International Public 362.Google Scholar
Bass, G., Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crime Tribunals (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Beening, A., ‘A Riddle of the Sands: The German-Dutch Border Dispute Over the Boundary in the Ems-Dollart Estuary, 1909–1914’ (1996) 20 Dutch Crossing 61.Google Scholar
Bingham, T., ‘The Alabama Claims Arbitration’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
Drago, L. M., ‘State Loans in Their Relations to International Policy’ (1907) 1 American Journal of International Law 692.Google Scholar
Dulon, R., ‘The Venezuela Arbitration Once More: Facts and Law’ (1904) 38 American Law Review 648.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M., and Viñuales, J. E., ‘The Challenge of Proliferation: An Anatomy of the Debate’, in Romano, C., Alter, K. and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 135–157.Google Scholar
Fisler Damrosch, L., ‘The Impact of the Nicaragua Case on the Court and Its Role: Harmful, Helpful or In Between?’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 135.Google Scholar
Høgestøl, S. A. E., ‘Palestinian Membership of the ICC: A Preliminary Analysis’ (2015) 33 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 193.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, G., ‘Non-Disputing State Submissions in Investment Arbitration: Resurgence of Diplomatic Protection?’, in de Chazournes, L. Boisson, Kohen, M. and Viñuales, J. E. (eds.), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 307–326.Google Scholar
Maass, M., ‘Catalyst for the Roosevelt Corollary: Arbitrating the 1902–1903 Venezuela Crisis and Its Impact on the Development of the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine’ (2009) 20 Diplomacy & Statecraft 383.Google Scholar
Moon, D., ‘Equality and Inequality in the WTO Dispute Settlement (DS) System: Analysis of the GATT/WTO Dispute Data’ (2006) 32 International Interactions 201.Google Scholar
Moore, J. B., History and Digest of International Arbitrations (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1898), volumes 1 and 5.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., and VanderZee, L., ‘The History of International Adjudication’, in Romano, C., Alter, K. and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 42–62.Google Scholar
Pargeter, P., ‘The Libyan–Swiss Crisis: A Lesson in Libyan Foreign Policy’ (2010) 45 The International Spectator 101.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, C. G., ‘International Arbitration and Courts’, in Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 142–168.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., ‘The Role of Iraq in the UNCC Process with Special Emphasis on the Environmental Claims’, in Feighery, T. J., Gibson, C. S. and Rajah, T. M. (eds.), War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 135–184.Google Scholar
Schreuer, C., ‘Investment Protection and International Relations’, in Reinisch, A. and Kriebaum, U. (eds.), The Law of International Relations: Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold (The Hague: Eleven Publishing, 2007), pp. 345–358.Google Scholar
Sepúlveda Amor, B., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Latin American Experience’, in Jalloh, C. and Elias, O. (eds.), Shielding Humanity: Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Abdul G. Koroma (Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 2015), pp. 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, J. E., and Bentolila, D., ‘The Use of Alternative (Non-Judicial) Means to Enforce Investment Awards against States’, in de Chazournes, L. Boisson, Kohen, M. and Viñuales, J. E. (eds.), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013), pp. 247–278.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., ‘Palestine at the Gates of the Peace Palace: The Long and Windy Road towards Palestinian Membership in the Permanent Court of Arbitration’, EJIL Talk (5 April 2016).Google Scholar