Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Experimenting with Crime and Criminal Justice
- Part I Experimenting with Crime
- 2 Experimental Tests of Criminological Theory
- 3 Experimental Neurocriminology
- 4 Computer Simulation Experiments and the
- 5 Experiments in Guardianship Research
- Part II Experimenting with Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
- Part III Assessing Research Evidence and Future Directions
- Index
- References
2 - Experimental Tests of Criminological Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Experimenting with Crime and Criminal Justice
- Part I Experimenting with Crime
- 2 Experimental Tests of Criminological Theory
- 3 Experimental Neurocriminology
- 4 Computer Simulation Experiments and the
- 5 Experiments in Guardianship Research
- Part II Experimenting with Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
- Part III Assessing Research Evidence and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
THE SCARCITY OF THEORY IN EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY
Though randomized, controlled, experimental trials hardly dominate the landscape of research in criminology, we nonetheless find ourselves in the midst of what many scholars are calling the era of experimental criminology (Clear 2010; Sampson 2010). As Angrist (2006: 23) observes, “criminologists do not appear to have… ‘sciencephobia’…Criminology is the only one [social science] to show a marked increase in the use of randomized trials since the mid-sixties.” Not only has the reliance on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine “what works” grown in previous years – though the number of such inquiries arguably remains tied to the productivity of a handful of scholars (Farrington 2003) – but the prominence and endorsement of this method has also grown markedly, both inside and outside of academic circles.
To be clear, the view that randomized, controlled experimental methods provide important and rigorous methodological insight into empirical questions of interest to social scientists is hardly new. However, undeniably, the relevance and importance of this method for criminology specifically has gained increased momentum in recent years. The past decade and a half has witnessed the establishment of the Academy of Experimental Criminology, the Jerry Lee Centre of Experimental Criminology, the American Society of Criminology’s Division of Experimental Criminology, the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group, the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, and the Journal of Experimental Criminology. These organizations (and the journal) have a clear agenda of focusing attention on the importance of experiments for social science generally and criminology in particular; they argue that successfully implemented RCTs are the “gold standard” by which we should assess the effectiveness of policy and interventions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experimental CriminologyProspects for Advancing Science and Public Policy, pp. 15 - 42Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
1998. Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
2006. “Instrumental Variables Methods in Experimental Criminological Research: What, Why, and How.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 2(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1951. “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment.” In Groups, Leadership, and Men, edited by , pp. 177–90. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1963. “Vicarious Reinforcement and Imitative Learning.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(6): 601–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2005. “Randomized Experiments as the Bronze Standard.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(4): 416–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Why Good People Sometimes Do Bad Things: Motivated Reasoning and Unethical Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(1): 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Fare Dodging and the Strong Arm of the Law: An Experimental Evaluation of Two Different Penalty Schemes for Fare Evasion.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 3(2): 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2007. “Situational Deterrence and Claim Padding: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 34: 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Blueprints for violence prevention selection criteria. Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado at Boulder.Google Scholar
, and . 2008. “Policing Crime and Disorder Hot Spots: A Randomized Control Trial. Criminology 46(3): 577–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and . 1999. “Problem-oriented Policing in Violent Crime Places: A Randomized Control Experiment. Criminology 37(3): 541–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The Rise and Fall of Social Psychology: The Use and Misuse of the Experimental Method. New York: Walter deGruyter.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Triangulation.” In Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, edited by , , and , pp. 1142–3. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
, and . 1983. “Evaluating with Sense: The Theory-Driven Approach.” Evaluation Review 7(3): 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. “Policy and Evidence: The Challenge of the American Society of Criminology: Presidential Address to the American Society of Criminology.” Criminology 48(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44(4): 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Resistance to Experiments: Why Have Educational Evaluators Chosen Not to Do Randomized Experiments? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 589(1): 114–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.Google Scholar
, , , and . 2003. “What Correctional Treatment Can Tell Us about Criminological Theory: Implications for Social Learning Theory.” In Social Learning Theory and the Explanation of Crime, edited by and , pp. 339–62. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
2010. “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 48(2): 424–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “Strategies of Multiple Triangulation.” In The Research Act: The Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, edited by , pp. 297–313. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
, and . 1999. “Model Building in Developmental Psychopathology: A Pragmatic Approach to Understanding and Intervention.” Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 28(4): 502–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , and . 2005. “Peer Effects in Drug Use and Sex among College Students.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 33(3): 375–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and . 1990. “The Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Police Experiment.” Criminology 28(2): 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “The Application and Robustness of the Rational Choice Perspective in the Study of Intoxicated and Angry Intentions to Aggress.” Criminology 40(4): 933–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326(5952): 535–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1983. “Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice.” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 4(1): 257–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “A Short History of Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology: A Meager Feast.” Evaluation Review 27(3): 218–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. “Key Longitudinal-Experimental Studies in Criminology.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 2(2):121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2005. “Randomized Experiments in Criminology: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(1): 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2000. “Ethnography and Experiment in Social Psychological Theory Building: Tactics for Integrating Qualitative Field Data with Quantitative Lab Data.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36(1): 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 22(2): 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2007. “Unintended Consequences: Experimental Evidence for the Criminogenic Effect of Prison Security Level on Post-Release Recidivism.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 5(2): 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2005. “Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, and Risky Decision Making in Adolescence and Adulthood: An Experimental Study.” Developmental Psychology 41(4): 625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
1985. “General Deterrence and Television Cable Crime: A Field Experiment in Social Control.” Criminology 23(4): 629–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2006. “Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-City Social Experiment.” The University of Chicago Law Review 73 (1): 271–320.Google Scholar
, and . 1978. “Justification for Laboratory Theft: Moral Behavior of the Victim and Financial Need.” Pacific Sociological Review 21(4): 487–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. “Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation.” In Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs, edited by and , pp. 201–30. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1995. “Assessing the Case for Social Experiments.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2): 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1997. “Making the Most Out of Programme Evaluations and Social Experiments: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Programme Impacts.” The Review of Economic Studies 64(4): 487–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1999. “The Gendering of Violent Delinquency.” Criminology 37(2): 277–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The Vera Institute of Justice’s Third Annual Justice Address. Presented at the Vera Institute of Justice, New York, 2009. Retrieved from: (Accessed April 2013).
1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.” American Society Quarterly 24(4): 602–11.Google Scholar
2009. “A Natural Experiment on Residential Change and Recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina.” American Sociological Review 74(3): 484–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2005. “Neighborhood Effects on Crime for Female and Male Youth: Evidence from a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(1): 87–130.Google Scholar
, and . 1968. “Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10(3): 215–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 2003. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1997. “The Effect of Sexual Arousal on Expectations of Sexual Forcefulness.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 34(4): 443–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2005. “Why Do Evaluation Researchers in Crime and Justice Choose Non-Experimental Methods?” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1(2): 191–213.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Mixed-Method Research in Criminology: Why Not Go Both Ways? In Handbook of Quantitative Criminology , edited by and , pp. 123–40. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
, , and . 1998. “Controlling Drug and Disorder Problems: The Role of Place Managers.” Criminology 36(2): 371–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. “A Thirty Year Follow-up of Treatment Effects.” American Psychologist 33(3): 284–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and . 2009. “‘I Wasn’t Alone’: Collective Behaviour and Violent Delinquency.” The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 42 (3): 336–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. “An Experimental Investigation of Deterrence: Cheating, Self-Serving Bias, and Impulsivity.” Criminology 41(1): 167–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , , , , and . 1998. “Long-Term Effects of Nurse Home Visitation on Children’s Criminal and Antisocial Behavior: 15 Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 280(14): 1238–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 2004. “Projected Offending and Contemporaneous Rule Violation: Implications for Heterotypic Continuity.” Criminology 42(1): 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , , and . 2010. “The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta-Analysis.” Justice Quarterly 27(6): 765–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2009. OJP Nominee Vows to Be a “Good Steward” of Public Funds. Retrieved from: (Accessed April 2013).Google Scholar
, , , and . 2009. “Do Frustrated Economic Expectations and Objective Economic Inequity Promote Crime?: A Randomized Experiment Testing Agnew’s General Strain Theory.” European Journal of Criminology 6(1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. “Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 114(1): 189–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. “Gold Standard Myths: Observations on the Experimental Turn in Quantitative Criminology.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26(4): 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2005. “Seductions of Method: Rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay’s Developmental Trajectory Groups: Fact or Fiction?” Criminology 43(4): 905–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1931. The Natural History of a Delinquent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. “Reducing Incarceration Rates: The Promise of Experimental Criminology.” Crime & Delinquency 46(3): 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and . 1991. “From Initial Deterrence to Longterm Escalation: Short-Custody Arrest for Poverty Ghetto Domestic Violence.” Criminology 29(4): 821–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. “ Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Quantitative and Qualitative Research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 595(1): 204–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1973. “Certainty of Arrests and Crime Rates: A Further Test of the Deterrence Hypothesis.” Social Forces 52(4): 455–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and . 1996. “From Childhood Physical Aggression to Adolescent Maladjustment: The Montreal Prevention Experiment.” In Preventing Childhood Disorders, Substance Use, and Delinquency, edited by and , pp. 268–98. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
, , , and . 1986. “Sanctions, Modeling, and Deviant Behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice 14(6): 501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2001. “Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice?” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578(1): 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2008. “How Well Do Criminologists Explain Crime? Statistical Modeling in Published Studies. Crime and Justice 37(1): 453–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. “Individuals, Settings, and Acts of Crime: Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime.” In The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development, edited by Per-Olof Wikström and Robert J. Sampson, pp. 61–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2003. “Social Mechanisms of Community Influence on Crime and Pathways in Criminality.” In Causes of Conduct Disorder and Serious Juvenile Delinquency, edited by , and , pp. 118–48. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
1986. Meta-analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “The Effects of Status and Peer support on the Justifications and Approval of Deviance.” In Experiments in Criminology and Law: A Research Revolution, edited by and , pp. 93–112. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
1971. “The Power and Pathology of Imprisonment.” Congressional Record (Serial No. 15, October 25, 1971). Hearings before Subcommittee No. 3, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-Second Congress, First Session on Corrections, , Prisons, Prison Reform and Prisoner’s Rights: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- 34
- Cited by