Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:35:06.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Castoroidea

from Part V - Glires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Christine M. Janis
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Gregg F. Gunnell
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mark D. Uhen
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, R. M., Walton, A. H., and Honeycutt, R. L. (2003). Higher level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 26, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alf, R. (1962). A new species of the rodent Pipestoneomys from the Oligocene of Nebraska. Breviora, Museum of Comparative Zoology, 172, 1–7.Google Scholar
Allen,, J. A. (1877). Castoroididae. In Monographs of North American Rodentia, ed. Coues, E. and Allen, J. A., pp. 415–42. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office for the US Geological Survey of the Territories.Google Scholar
Barbour, E. H. and Schultz, C. B. (1937). An early Pleistocene fauna from Nebraska. American Museum Novitates, 942, 1–10.Google Scholar
Black, C. C. (1965). Fossil mammals from Montana. Part 2: Rodents from the early Oligocene Pipestone Springs Local Fauna. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 38, 1–48.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. (1874). On a new mastodon and a rodent. Proceedings Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia, 1874, 221–3.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. (1878). On some characters of the Miocene fauna of Oregon. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 18, 63–78.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. (1881). Review of the Rodentia of the Miocene period of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographic Survey of the Territories, 6, 361–86.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. R. (1966). Additional Late Eocene rodents from the Uinta Basin, Utah. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 38, 97–114.Google Scholar
Donohoe, J. C. (1956). New aplodontid rodent from Montana Oligocene. Journal of Mammalogy, 37, 264–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglass, E. (1901). Fossil Mammalia of the White River beds of Montana. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 20, 243–9.Google Scholar
Emry, R. J. (1972). A new species of Agnotocastor (Rodentia, Castoridae). American Museum Novitates, 2485, 1–7.Google Scholar
Evander, R. L. (1999). Rodents and lagomorphs (Mammalia) from the Railway Quarries local fauna (Miocene, Barstovian) of Nebraska. Paludicola, 2, 240–57.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. V. and Rensberger, J. M. (1972). Physical stratigraphy of the John Day Formation, central Oregon. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 101, 1–45.Google Scholar
Flynn, L. J. (1997). Late Neogene mammalian events in North China. Actes du Congrès BioChrom '97. Mémoire Travaux E.P.H.E., Institut Montpellier, 21, 1183–92.Google Scholar
Foster, J. W. (1838). Organic remains. In Ohio Geological Survey Second Annual Report, pp. 79–83. Columbus, OH: Division of Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Fremd,, T., Bestland,, E. A., and Retallack,, G. J. 1997. John Day Basin Paleontology: Field Trip Guide and Road Log, for 1994 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA: Northwest Interpretive Association (in association with John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Kimberly, OR).Google Scholar
Galbreath, E. C. (1953). A contribution to the Tertiary geology and paleontology of northeastern Colorado. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. Vertebrata, 4, 1–120.Google Scholar
Gill, T. (1872). Arrangement of the families of mammals with analytical tables. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 11, 1–98.Google Scholar
Hay,, O. P. (1927). The Pleistocene of the Western Region of North America and its Vertebrated Animals. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute.Google Scholar
Hemprich, W. (1820). Grundriss der Naturgeschichte für höhere Lehranstalten Entworfen von Dr. W. Hemprich. Berlin: August Rucker; Vienna: Friedrich Volke.Google Scholar
Hibbard, C. W. (1938). An upper Pliocene fauna from Meade County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 40, 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbard, C. W. (1949). Pliocene Saw Rock Canyon fauna in Kansas. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 7, 91–105.Google Scholar
Hugueney,, M. (1999). Family Castoridae. In The Miocene Land Mammals of Europe, ed. Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K., pp. 281–300. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Kellogg, L. (1911). A fossil beaver from Kettleman Hills, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 6, 401–2.Google Scholar
Koenigswald, W. and Mörs, T. (2001). The enamel microstructure of Anchitheriomys (Rodentia, Mammalia) in comparison with that of other beavers and porcupines. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74, 601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. (1984). Earliest Tertiary evolution and radiation of rodents in North America. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 24, 1–71.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1988). A new species of beaver (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the middle Oligocene (Orellan). Journal of Paleontology, 62, 965–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1994). The Tertiary Record of Rodents in North America. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1996a). A new genus of beaver (Mammalia: Castoridae: Rodentia) from the Arikareean (Oligocene) of Montana and its bearing on castorid phylogeny. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 65, 167–79.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1996b). Additional specimens of Agnotocastor readingi (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Orellan (Oligocene) of Nebraska and a possible origin of the beavers. Paludicola, 1, 16–20.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1998a). A new beaver (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Orellan (Oligocene) of North Dakota. Paludicola, 1, 127–31.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1998b). Rodents and lagomorphs (Mammalia) from the late Clarendonian (Miocene) Ash Hollow Formation, Brown County, Nebraska. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 67, 299–348.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(1999). A new species of beaver (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the earliest Barstovian (Miocene) of Nebraska and the phylogeny of Monosaulax Stirton. Paludicola, 2, 258–64.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2000a). A new species of Eutypomys Matthew (Rodentia, Eutypomyidae) from the Orellan (Oligocene) and reevaluation of “Eutypomys” magnus Wood. Paludicola, 2, 273–8.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2000b). Rediscovery of lost holotype of Monosaulax pansus (Rodentia, Castoridae). Paludicola, 2, 279–81.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2001a). Comments on the systematics and classification of beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae). Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 8, 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2001b). A new species of Anchitheriomys (Rodentia: Castoridae) and a review of the anchitheriomyine beavers from North America. Paludicola, 3, 51–5.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2001c). Occurrence of the European genus of beaver Euroxenomys (Rodentia: Castoridae) in North America. Paludicola, 3, 73–9.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2002a). Topotypic cranial material of the beaver Monosaulax pansus Cope (Rodentia, Castoridae). Paludicola, 4, 1–5.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W.(2002b). Review of the castoroidine beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the Clarendonian (Miocene) of northcentral Nebraska. Paludicola, 4, 15–24.Google Scholar
(2004). Beavers (Rodentia, Castoridae) form the Runningwater Formation (Early Miocene, Early Hemingfordian) of western Nebraska. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 73, 2, 61–71.
Korth, W. W. and Emry, R. J. (1997). The skull of Anchitheriomys and a new subfamily of beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia). Journal of Paleontology, 71, 343–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. and Rybczynski, N. (2003). A new, unusual castorid (Rodentia) from the earliest Miocene of Nebraska. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23, 667–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. and Stout, T. M. (2002). A diminutive beaver (Rodentia, Castoridae) from the late Clarendonian (Miocene) of South Dakota. Paludicola, 3, 134–8.Google Scholar
Lambe, L. M. (1908). The Vertebrata of the Oligocene of the Cypress Hills, Saskatchewan. Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology, 3, 56–7.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1856). Notices of remains of extinct Mammalia discovered by Dr. F. V. Hayden in Nebraska Territory. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 8, 1–89.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1858). Notices of some remains of extinct Vertebrata from the valley of the Niobrara River, collected during the exploring expedition of 1857 in Nebraska (under the command of Lieut. G. K. Warren, U.S. Top. Eng.). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 10, 1–23.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1869). The extinct mammalian fauna of Dakota and Nebraska, including an account of some allied forms from other localities, together with a synopsis of the mammalian remains of North America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 2, 1–472.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Vol. 1: Regnuma Animale, 10th edn, revised. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvi.Google Scholar
Lundelius,, E. L., Downs,, T., Lindsay,, E. H., et al. (1987). The North American Quaternary sequence. In Cenozoic Mammals of North America, Geochronology and Biostratigraphy, ed. Woodburne, M. O., pp. 211–35. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lytschev, G. F. (1983). Osnovnyye napravleniya evolyutsii v semeystve Castoridae. [The basic directions in the evolution of the family Castoridae.] In Istoriya I Evolyutsiya Sovremennoy Fauny Gryzunov SSSR (Neogen-Sovreennost'), ed. Gromov, I. M., pp. 179–203. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. R. (1963). The Miocene Wounded Knee faunas of southwestern South Dakota. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 125, 141–238.Google Scholar
Macdonald, J. R. (1970). Review of the Miocene faunas from the Wounded Knee area of western South Dakota. Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Science, 8, 1–82.Google Scholar
Martin, L. D. (1973). The mammalian fauna of the Lower Miocene Gering Formation and the early evolution of the North American Cricetidae. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Martin, L. D. (1987). Beavers from the Harrison Formation (early Miocene) with a revision of Euhapsis. Dakoterra, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, 3, 73–91.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. (1905). Notice of two new genera of mammals from the Oligocene of South Dakota. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 21, 21–6.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. (1907). A lower Miocene fauna from South Dakota. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 23, 169–219.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. (1918). Contributions to the Snake Creek fauna, with notes upon the Pleistocene of western Nebraska. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 38, 197–9.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. and Cook, H. J. (1909). A Pliocene fauna from western Nebraska. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 26, 380–1.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, J. C. (1896). Sigmophius Le Contei, a new castoroid rodent from the Pliocene near Berkeley, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 1, 363–70.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. (1838). Letter on Swiss fossils. Magazine of Natural History New Series, 2, 583–8.Google Scholar
Miller, G. S. and Gidley, J. W. (1918). Synopsis of the supergeneric groups of rodents. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 8, 431–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, C., Opdyke, N. D. and Lindsay, E. H. (1979). Magnetic stratigraphy of Pliocene deposits of the Glenns Ferry Formation, Idaho, and its implications for North American mammalian biostratigraphy. American Journal of Science, 279, 503–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, R. (1979). Additional early Miocene mammals from the Lemhi Valley of Idaho. Tebiwa, Miscellaneous Papers, 17, 1–12.Google Scholar
Peterson, O. A. (1905). Description of new rodents and discussion of the origin of Daemonelix. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, 2, 139–200.Google Scholar
Repenning,, C. A. (1987). Biochronology of the microtine rodents of the United States. In Cenozoic Mammals of North America, Geochronology and Biostratigraphy, ed. Woodburne, M. O., pp. 236–68. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. S. (2002). How big is a giant? The importance of method in estimating body size of extinct mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 83, 321–32.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, C. and Cole, T. M. III (2004). Environmental seasonality and incremental growth rates of beaver (Castor canadensis) incisors: implications for paleobiology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 206, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinker, G. C. and Hibbard, C. W. (1952). A new beaver, and associated vertebrates, from the Pleistocene of Oklahoma. Journal of Mammalogy, 33, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, O. (1898). Wirbeltierreste aus dem Dinotheriensande der bayerisch-schwäbischen Hochebene. Bericht des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg, 33, 1–46.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. and McCormack, J. T. (1928). A large Palaeocastor from the lower Miocene. American Journal of Science, 15, 59–60.Google Scholar
Rybczynski, N. (2004). Effect of incisor shape on woodcutting performance in two beavers (Castoridae, Rodentia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24(suppl. to no. 3), p. 107A.Google Scholar
Samson,, P. and Radulesco,, C. (1973). Remarques sur l'evolution des Castorides (Rodentia, Mammalia). In Livre du Cinquantenaire de l'Institut de Spéléologie “Emile Racovitza”, ed. Orghidan, T., pp 437–49. Bucharest: Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania.Google Scholar
Schlosser, M. (1884). Die Nager des europäischen Tertiärs nebst Betrachtungen über die Organisation und die geschichtliche Entwicklung der Nager überhaupt. Palaeontographica, 31, 19–162.Google Scholar
Schlosser, M. (1902). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Säugetierreste aus den süddeutschen Bohnerzen. Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen Jena, 5, 21–3.Google Scholar
Scott,, W. B. (1893). The mammals of the Deep River beds. The American Naturalist, 27, 680.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. (1955). Review of the Pliocene beaver Dipoides. Journal of Paleontology, 29, 129–44.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. (1963). Mammalian fauna of the Drewsey Formation, Bartlett Mountrain, Drinkwater and Otis Basin local faunas. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 53, 70–7.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. (1968). Miocene mammals of southeast Oregon. Bulletin of the Museum of Natural History, University of Oregon, 14, 1–67.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. (1970). Pliocene mammals of southeast Oregon and adjacent Idaho. Bulletin of the Museum of Natural History, University of Oregon, 17, 1–103.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. A. and Russell, D. E. (1963). Juntura Basin: Studies in earth history and paleontology. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 53, 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirton,, R. A. (1934). A new species of Amblycastor from the Platybelodon beds, Tung Gur Formation, of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates, 694, 1–4.Google Scholar
(1935). A review of the Tertiary beavers. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 23, 391–458.
Stirton, R. A. (1936). A new beaver from the Pliocene of Arizona with notes on the species of Dipoides. Journal of Mammalogy, 17, 279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, J. E. (1975). Tertiary mammals of Saskatchewan. Part III: The Miocene fauna. Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum, 103, 1–134.Google Scholar
Storer, J. E. (1984). Mammals of the Swift Current Creek local fauna (Eocene: Uintan, Saskatchewan). Natural History Contributions, Museum of Natural History, Regina, 7, 1–158.Google Scholar
Storer, J. E. (1988). The rodents of the Lac Pelletier lower fauna, late Eocene (Duchesnean) of Saskatchewan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 8, 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, T. M. (1967). [Addendum in M. F. Skinner and B. E. Taylor] A revision of the geology and paleontology of the Bijou Hills, South Dakota. American Museum Novitates, 2300, 1–53.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. F. and Korth, W. W. (1995). Rodents (Mammalia) from the Barstovian (Miocene) Anceny local fauna, Montana. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 64, 267–314.Google Scholar
Tedford, R. H. and Harington, C. R. (2003). An Arctic mammal fauna from the Early Pliocene of North America. Nature, 425, 388–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teilhard, Chardin P. (1942). New rodents of the Pliocene and lower Pleistocene of North China. Publications de l'Institut Géo-Biologie, Pekin, 9, 1–101.Google Scholar
Wahlert, J. H. (1977). Cranial foramina and relationships of Eutypomys (Rodentia, Eutypomyidae). American Museum Novitates, 2626, 1–8.Google Scholar
Walton, A. H. (1993). A new genus of eutypomyid (Mammalia: Rodentia) from the middle Eocene of the Texas Gulf Coast. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 13, 262–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. L. (1968). Systematics and faunal analysis of a lower Pliocene vertebrate assemblage from Trego County, Kansas. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 22, 75–126.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W. (1934). A new species of Dipoides from the Pliocene of eastern Oregon. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 453, 19–28.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W. (1949). Early Tertiary rodents of North America. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 584, 67–164.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. W. (1960). Early Miocene rodents and insectivores from northeastern Colorado. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Vertebrata, 7, 1–92.Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. (1937). The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene. Part 2: Rodentia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 28, 155–269.Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. (1974). Early Tertiary vertebrate faunas, Vieja Group, Trans-Pecos Texas: Rodentia. Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum, 21, 1–112.Google Scholar
Wood, A. E. (1980). The Oligocene rodents of North America. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 70, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. E. and Konizeski, R. L. (1965). A new eutypomyid rodent from the Arikareean (Miocene) of Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 39, 492–6.Google Scholar
Wood, H. E. (1945). Late Miocene beaver from southeastern Montana. American Museum Novitates, 1299, 1–6.Google Scholar
Woodburne, M. O. (1961). Upper Pliocene geology and vertebrate paleontology of part of the Meade Basin, Kansas. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, Paleontology, 46, 61–95.Google Scholar
Xu, X. F. (1994). Evolution of Chinese Castoridae. In Rodent and Lagomorph Families of Asian Origins and Diversification, ed. Tomida, Y., Li, C. K., and Setoguchi, T.. National Science Museum of Tokyo Monograph, 8, 77–98.Google Scholar
Xu, X. F. (1995). Phylogeny of beavers (Family Castoridae): applications to faunal dynamics and biochronology since the Eocene. Ph.D. Thesis, Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
Xu,, X. F. (1996). Castoridae. In The Terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene Transition in North America, ed. Prothero, D. R. and Emry, R. J., pp. 417–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zakrzewski, R. J. (1969). The rodents from the Hagerman local fauna, upper Pliocene of Idaho. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 23, 1–36.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×