Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T10:39:35.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment

from Part V - European nitrogen policies and future challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

Corjan Brink
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Hans van Grinsven
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Brian H. Jacobsen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Ari Rabl
Affiliation:
ARMINES/Ecoles des Mines de Paris
Ing-Marie Gren
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mike Holland
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Zbigniew Klimont
Affiliation:
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Kevin Hicks
Affiliation:
University of York
Roy Brouwer
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
Roald Dickens
Affiliation:
Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs
Jaap Willems
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Mette Termansen
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus
Gerard Velthof
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Rob Alkemade
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Mark van Oorschot
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Jim Webb
Affiliation:
AEA Energy and Environment
Mark A. Sutton
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Clare M. Howard
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Jan Willem Erisman
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Gilles Billen
Affiliation:
CNRS and University of Paris VI
Albert Bleeker
Affiliation:
Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands
Peringe Grennfelt
Affiliation:
Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL)
Hans van Grinsven
Affiliation:
PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Bruna Grizzetti
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Get access

Summary

Executive summary

Nature of the problem

  • Single issue policies have been an effective means of reducing reactive nitrogen (Nr) emissions in the EU, but to make further reductions more-integrated approaches are required.

Approaches

  • This chapter shows how cost–benefit analysis (CBA) can provide guidance for the setting of new policy priorities for the abatement of the European Nr emissions from an integrated perspective.

  • Data on costs and benefits of Nr-abatement, including four national and regional case studies, are reviewed and made comparable by expression in euro per kg of added Nr (agriculture) or euro per kg of reduced Nr emission (unit cost approach).

  • Social cost estimates are based on Willingness to Pay (WTP) for human life or health, for ecosystem services and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction.

Key findings

  • The total annual Nr-related damage in EU27 ranges between 70 and 320 billion Euro, equivalent to 150–750 euro/capita, of which about 75% is related to health damage and air pollution. This damage cost constitutes 1%–4% of the average European income.

  • Inferred social costs of health impacts from NOx are highest (10–30 euro per kg of pollutant-Nr emission). Health costs from secondary ammonium particles (2–20 euro/kg N), from GHG balance effects of N2O (5–15 euro/kg N), from ecosystem impacts via N-runoff (5–20 euro/kg N) and by N-deposition (2–10 euro/kg N) are intermediate. Costs of health impacts from NO3 in drinking water (0–4 euro/kg N) and by N2O via stratospheric ozone depletion (1–3 euro/kg N) are estimated to be low.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The European Nitrogen Assessment
Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives
, pp. 513 - 540
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ademsam, H., Bruck, M., Geissler, S. and Fellner, M. (2002). Externe Kosten im Hochbau. Band 1. Studie im auftrag des: Bundesministerium für Wirstschaf und Arbeit.
,AQUAMONEY (2010). http://www.aquamoney.ecologic-events.de/sites/results.html
Barret, M. and Holland, M. (2008). The Costs and Health Benefits of Reducing Emissions from Power Stations in Europe. The Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain, Sweden and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), Brussels, Belgium.
Beek, K., Hesen, P., Kappelhof, J. and Vink, K. (2006). Consequenties huidige vermesting voor de waterleidingbedrijven (in Dutch). H2O, 39, 25–28.Google Scholar
Beier, C. and Rasmussen, L. (1994). Effects of whole-ecosystem manipulations on ecosystem internal processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bérubé, G. and Cusson, C. (2002). The environmental legal and regulatory frameworks: assessing fairness and efficiency. Energy Policy, 30, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, P. and Friedrich, R. (eds.) (2005). Externalities of Energy: Methodology 2005 Update. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. http://www.externe.info/.
Blottnitz, H., Rabl, A., Boiadjiev, D., Taylor, T. and Arnold, S., (2006). Damage costs of nitrogen fertilizer in Europe and their internalization. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49, 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, F., Boekel, E., Clevering, O.et al. (2008). Ex-ante evaluatie landbouw en KRW: effect van voorgenomen en potentieel aanvullende maatregelen op de oppervlaktewaterkwaliteit voor nutriënten (in Dutch). Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands. http://library.wur.nl/way/bestanden/clc/1877408.pdf.
Braat, L. and ten Brink, P. (2008). The Cost of Policy Inaction: The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target, Study for European Commission, DG Environment. Contract ENV.G.1/ETU/2007/0044. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/teeb_en.htm
Brandt, H. (2002). Kosten und Auswirkungen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP) in Deutschland. Oxfam Deutschland, Berlin.
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P. and Kuhlmann, H. (2004). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 20, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C., Ierland, E. C., Hordijk, L. and Kroeze, C. (2005). Cost-effective emission abatement in agriculture in the presence of interrelations: cases for the Netherlands and Europe. Ecological Economics, 53, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broek, J. A, Hofwegen, G., Beekman, W. and Wottiez, M. (2007). Options for Increasing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Dutch Dairy and Arable Farming towards 2030. Statutory Research Task Unit for Nature and Environment, Wageningen, The Netherlands. http://www.wotnatuurenmilieu.wur.nl
Brouwer, R. and Ek, R. (2004). Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 50, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, R. and Blois, C. (2008). Integrated modelling of risk and uncertainty underlying the selection of cost-effective water quality measures. Environmental Modelling and Software, 23, 922–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, R., Hofkes, M. and Linderhof, V. (2008). General equilibrium modelling of the direct and indirect economic impacts of water quality improvements in the Netherlands at national and river basin scale. Ecological Economics, 66, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brussaard, L., Ruiter, P. C. and Brown, G. G. (2007). Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 121, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Gundersen, P., Ambus, P.et al. (2011). Nitrogen processes in terrestrial ecosystems. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carraro, C. (ed.) (2000). Efficiency and Equity in Climate Change Policy. Kluwer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.CrossRef
Carraro, C. and Buchner, B. (2002). Equity, development and climate change policy. In: Climate Change Policy Regimes, International Trade and Growth, ed. Carraro, C. and Kemfert, C., Buchner, B., CEPS-ESRI Collaboration Studies, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
,CEC (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution, SEC(2005) 1132. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
,CEC (2007a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type approval of motor vehicles and engines with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, COM(2007) 851 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
,CEC (2007b). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control), COM(2007) 844 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
Clayton, H., McTaggart, I. P., Parker, J., Swan, L. and Smith, K. A. (1997). Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilised grassland: A 2-year study of the effects of N fertiliser form and environmental conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 25, 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cofala, J. and Syri, S. (1998). Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, Abatement Technologies and Related Costs for Europe in the RAINS Model Database. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
Costanza, R. (1980). Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science, 210, 1219–1224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, J. S., Fleming, E. L., Portmann, R. W.et al. (2010). Options to accelerate ozone recovery: ozone and climate benefits. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 10, 10839–10863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenberg, A. (2008). Do equity preferences matter in climate negotiations? An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the 13th EAERE conference, Gothenburg, June, 2008.
DeRoos, A. J., Ward, M. H., Lynch, C. F. and Cantor, K. P. (2003). Nitrate in public water supplies and the risk of colon and rectum cancers. Epidemiology, 14, 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeuw, A., ,Int Veld, R., Soest, D., Meuleman, L. and Hoogewoning, P. (2008). Social Cost Benefit Analysis for Environmental Policy-Making, Background Study. RMNO (Advisory Council for Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment), Den Haag, The Netherlands. http://www.rmno.nl/files_content/SCBA%20report%20webversie.pdf
Desaigues, B., Ami, D., Bartczak, A.et al. (2007). Final Report on the Monetary Valuation of Mortality and Morbidity Risks from Air Pollution. Deliverable for WP6 of RS1b of NEEDS project. July 2007.
Diemont, W. H. and Oude Voshaar, J. H. (1994). Effects of climate and management on the productivity of Dutch heathlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 709–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, W., Prins, H., Haan, M. H. A.et al. (2007). Economisch consequenties op bedrijfsniveau van het gebruiksnormenstelsel 2006–2009 voor de melkveehouderij en akker- en tuinbouw (in Dutch), Rapport PPO no. 365. Praktijkonderzoek Plant and Omgeving. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Dise, N. B., Ashmore, M., Belyazid, S.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial biodiversity. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbie, K. E. and Smith, K. A. (2003). Impact of different forms of N fertilizer on N2O emission from intensive grassland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 67, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,EC (1991). Council of the European Communities. Directive concerning urban wastewater treatment (91/271/EEC).
,EC (2008). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB). Interim report 2008. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
,Econcept (2006). NEEDS: Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability. Deliverable D.4.2.-RS 1b/WP4 – July06. Econcept AG.
,EFMA (2008). Forecast of Food, Farming and Fertilizer Use 2008 to 2018. Volume 1: Executive Summary and Regional Data. European Fertilizer Manufactures Association (EFMA), Zurich.
Authority, European Food Safety (2008). Nitrates in vegetables. Efsa Journal689.
,Eurostat (2010). www.epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
,ExternE (2005).
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W.et al. (2008). Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science, 320, 889–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandorfer, M. (2006). Bewertung von Precision Farming dargestellt am Beispiel der teilflächenspezifischen Stickstoffdüngung. Diss. Technischen Universität, München
Glendining, M. J. and Powlson, D. S. (1995). The effects of long continued applications of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on soil organic nitrogen: a review. In: Soil Management, Experimental Basis for Sustainability and Environmental Quality, ed. Lal, R. and Stewart, B. A., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 385–446.Google Scholar
Grasso, M. (2007). A normative ethical framework in climate change. Climatic Change, 81, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gren, I.-M. (2008). Costs and Benefits from Nutrient Reductions to the Baltic Sea. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/978–91–620–5877–7.pdf.
Gren, I.-M., Jonzon, Y. and Lindqvist, M. (2008). Costs of Nutrient Reductions to the Baltic Sea: Technical Report, Working paper 2008:1. Department of Economics, SLU, Uppsala.
Grinsven, H., Eerdt, M., Willems, J., Hubeek, F. and Mulleneers, E. (2005). Evaluation of the Dutch manure and fertilizer policy, 1998–2002. In: Evaluating Agri-Environmental Policies: Design, Practice and Results, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp. 398–410.Google Scholar
Grinsven, H. J. M.Rabl, A., Kok, T. M., Grizzetti, B. (2010). Estimation of incidence and social cost of colon cancer due to nitrate in drinking water in the EU: a tentative cost–benefit assessment. Environmental Health.CrossRef
Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Billen, G.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ham, A., Daatselaar, C. H. G., Doornewaard, G. J. and Hoop, D. W. (2007). De eerste ervaringen met het Gebruiksnormenstelsel. Studie in het kader van de Evaluatie Meststoffenwet 2007. Hoofdrapport, Rapport no. 3.07.04. Landbouw Economisch Instituut (LEI), Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Hannerz, F. and Destouni, G. (2006). Spatial characterization of the Baltic Sea drainage basin and its unmonitored catchments. Ambio, 35, 214–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Helcom (1993). The Baltic Sea Joint Comprehensive Environmental Action Programme, Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 48. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki, Finland.
,Helcom (2004). The Fourth Baltic Sea Pollution Load Compilation (PLC-4). Helsinki Commission. Helsinki, Finland.
,Helcom (2007). An Approach to Set Country-Wise Nutrient Reduction Allocations to Reach Good Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea, Helcom BSAP Eutro Expo/2007. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki, Finland.
Henke, J., Breusted, G., Sieling, K. and Kage, H. (2007). Impact of uncertainty on the optimum nitrogen fertilization rate and agronomic, ecological and economic factors in an oilseed rape based crop rotation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 145, 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, M, Hunt, A., Hurley, F., Navrud, S. and Watkiss, P. (2005a). Methodology for the Cost–Benefit Analysis for CAFE: Volume 1: Overview of Methodology, AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, UK, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/cafe/pdf/cba_methodology_vol1.pdf.
Holland, M., Watkiss, P., Pye, S., Oliveira, A. and Regemorter, D. (2005b). Cost–Benefit Analysis of Policy Option Scenarios for the Clean Air for Europe Programme for Service Contract for Carrying out Cost–Benefit Analysis of Air Quality Related Issues, in Particular in the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme. http://www.cafe-cba.org/assets/thematic_strategy_analysis_v3.pdf.
,IIASA (2008). National Emission Ceilings for 2020 based on the 2008 Climate and Energy Package IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/rains/reports/NEC6-final110708.pdf.
Jacobsen, B. H. (2004). Økonomisk slutevaluering af Vandmiljøplan II, Rapport no. 169. Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
Jacobsen, B. H. (2007). In Search of Cost-Effective Measures, Report No. 191. Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
Jacobsen, B. H., Abildtrup, J., Andersen, M.et al. (2004). Omkostninger ved reduktion af landbrugets næringsstoftab til vandmiljøet: Forarbejde til vandmiljøplan III [Cost of reducing nutrient losses from agriculture – Analyses prior to the Danish Aquatic Programme III]. Report no. 167. Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Copenhagen University, Denmark.
Jacobsen, T., Refsgaard, A., Jacobsen, B. H. and Ørum, J. E. (2007). Integrated modelling of nitrate loads to coastal waters and land rent applied to catchment scale water management. Water Science and Technology, 56, 39–47.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. S., Schjoerring, J. K., Hoek, K.et al. (2011) Benefits of nitrogen for food fibre and industrial production. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. K., Rees, R. M., Skiba, U. M. and Ball, B. C. (2005). Greenhouse gas emissions from a managed grassland. Global and Planetary Change, 47, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. K., Rees, R. M., Skiba, U. M. and Ball, B. C. (2007). Influence of organic and mineral fertilizer on N2O fluxes from a temperate grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 121, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, S. A., Mulvaney, R. L., Ellsworth, T. R. and Boast, C. W. (2007). The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 1821–1832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kibblewhite, M. G., Ritz, K. and Swift, M. J. (2008). Soil health in agricultural systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 685–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimont, Z. and Brink, C. (2004). Modelling of Emissions of Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases from Agricultural Sources in Europe. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
Lammens, E. H. R. R. (1999). The central role of fish in lake restoration and management. Hydrobiologia, 395–396, 1573–1617.Google Scholar
Lammens, E. H. R. R., Nes, E. H.Meijer, M.-L. and Berg, M. S. (2004). Effects of commercial fishery on the bream population and the expansion of Chara aspera in Lake Veluwe. Ecological Modelling, 177, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, A., Vogt, C. and Ziegler, A. (2007). On the importance of equity in international climate policy: empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 29, 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leip, A., Achermann, B., Billen, G.et al. (2011). Integrating nitrogen fluxes at the European scale. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-K. and Mjelde, W. J. (2007). Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: the case of the Korean DMZ. Ecological Economics, 63, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markandya, A., Halsnaes, K., Lanza, A.et al. (2001). Costing methodologies. In: Climate change 2001. Mitigation, ed. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R. J. and Pan, J., Cambridge University Press, pp. 451–98.Google Scholar
Markandya, A., Nunes, P. A. L. D., Bräuer, I.et al. (2008). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – Phase 1 (Scoping): Economic Analysis and Synthesis. European Commission, Venice, Italy.
,Methodex (2010). http://www.methodex.org/BeTa-Methodex%20v2.xls
Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
Meijer, M. L. (2000). Biomanipulation in the Netherlands: 15 years of experience. PhD thesis Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Moldanová, J., Grennfelt, P., Jonsson, Å. et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European air quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, M., Niemeyer, T., Fottner, S., Härdtle, W. and Mohamed, A. (2007). Impact of sod-cutting and choppering on nutrient budgets of dry heathlands. Biological Conservation, 134, 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, P. A. L. D., Bergh, J. C. J. M. and Nijkamp, P. (2003). The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity: Methods and Applications, E. Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
O'Neill, J. (1997). Managing without prices: the monetary valuation of biodiversity. Ambio, 26, 546–550.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. and Odum, E. P. (2000). The energetic basis for valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 3, 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Velthof, G. L. and Kuikman, P. J. (2001). Technical and policy aspects of strategies to decrease greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 60, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Oudendag, D. A., Witzke, H. P.et al. (2007). Integrated Measures in Agriculture to Reduce Ammonia Emissions, Final summary report. European Commission service contract 070501/2005/422822/MAR/C1. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Oenema, O., Witzke, H. P., Klimont, Z., Lesschen, J. P. and Velthof, G. L. (2009). Integrated assessment of promising measures to decrease nitrogen losses from agriculture in EU-27. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 133, 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Bleeker, A., Braathen, N. A.et al. (2011). Nitrogen in current European policies. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. M. A. Sutton, C. M. Howard, J. W. Erisman et al., Cambridge University Press.
Olson, R. A. and Kurtz, L. T. (1982). Crop nitrogen requirements, utilization and fertilization. In: Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils, ed. F. J. Stevenson, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 567–599.Google Scholar
Oosterhuis, F. (ed.) (2006). Ex-Post Estimates of Costs to Business of EU Environmental Legislation, IVM Report E-06/08. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oosterhuis, F. (2007). Cost Decreases in Environmental Technology: Evidence from Four Case Studies. IVM Report R-07/05, July 2007. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Ott, W., Baur, M., Kaufmann, Y., Frishknecht, R. and Steiner, R. (2006). Assessment of biodiversity losses. Deliverable D4.2.-RS 1b/WP4 – July 06. NEEDS (New Energy Externalities Developments and Sustainability). Project nr. 502678. Switzerland.
,PBL (2007). Werking van de Meststoffenwet 2006. (In Dutch. Translated title: Evaluation of the Fertiliser Act 2006. Transition from a system of loss standards to a system of use standards). Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Pedersen, S. M., Bizik, J., Costa, L. D.et al. (2005). Potato Production in Europe: A Gross Margin Analysis. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg.
Pretty, J. N., Mason, C. F., Nedwell, D. B.et al. (2003). Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pye, S., Holland, M., Regenmorter, D., Wagner, A. and Wattiss, P. (2008). Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Proposed Revisions to the National Emission Ceilings Directive. NEC CBA Report 3. National Emmision Ceilings for 2020 based on the 2008 Climate and Energy Package. http://www.cafe-cba.org/assets/necdcba3.pdf
Rabl, A. (2003). Interpretation of air pollution mortality: number of deaths or years of life lost?Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 53, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rafaelli, D., Termansen, M., Austen, M.et al. (2009). Valuation of Biodiversity, NERC, Peterborough, UK.
Ravishankara, A. R., Daniel, J. S. and Portmann, R. W. (2009). Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science, 326, 123–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Anchor Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, L., Romanenkov, V., Sirotenko, O.et al. (2003). Effect of natural and agricultural factors on long-term soil organic matter dynamics in arable soddy-podzolic soils: modeling and observation. Geoderma, 116, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K. and Kage, H. (2008). The potential of semi-dwarf oilseed rape genotypes to reduce the risk of N leaching. Journal of Agricultural Science, 146, 77–84.Google Scholar
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z.et al. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 789–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderqvist, T. and Hasselström, L. (2008). The Economic Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/978–91–620–5874–6.pdf
Sommer, S. G. (2001). Effect of composting on nutrient loss and nitrogen availability of cattle deep litter. European Journal of Agronomy, 14, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struijs, J., Dijk, A., Slaper, H.et al. (2010). Spatial- and time-explicit human damage modeling of ozone depleting substances in life cycle impact assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 204–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiedje, J. M. (1988). Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. In: Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, ed. A. J. B. Zehnder, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 179–243.Google Scholar
,Treasury (2010). http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/data_greenbook_index.htm
Townsend, A. R., Howarth, R. W., Bazzaz, F. A.et al. (2003). Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNECE (2007). Guidance Document on Control Techniques for Preventing and Abating Emissions of Ammonia, ECE/EB.AIR/WG.5/2007/13. UNECE, Geneva.
Velthof, G. L., Oenema, O., Postma, R. and Beusichem, M. L. (1997). Effects of type and amount of applied nitrogen fertilizer on nitrous oxide fluxes from intensively managed grassland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 46, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthof, G. L., Oudendag, D., Witzke, H. P.et al. (2009). Integrated assessment of nitrogen emissions from agriculture in EU-27 using MITERRA EUROPE. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 402–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velthof, G., Barot, S., Bloem, J.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European soil quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winiwarter, W., Höglund-Isakssen, L., Schöpp, W.et al. (2009). Emission abatement potentials and costs for non-CO2 greenhouse gases in Annex-I countries according to the GAINS model. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International NCGG Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 30 June – 3 July 2009.
Witzke, H. P. and Oenema, O. (2007). Assessment of Most Promising Measures: Task 3 Service Contract – Integrate Measures in Agriculture to Reduce Ammonia Emissions. http://www.scamonia.wur.nl.
Wolf, R. J. A. M., Dimmers, W. J., Hommel, P. W. F. M.et al. (2006). Bekalking en toevoegen van nutriënten Evaluatie van de effecten op het bosecosysteem: een veldonderzoek naar vegetatie, humus en bodemfauna. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wulff, F., Bonsdorff, E., Gren, I.-M., Stigebrandt, A. and Johansson, S. (2001). Integrated management of the Baltic Sea. AMBIO, 30, 254–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. X. and Folmer, H. (1998). Economic modelling approaches to cost estimates for the control of carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Economics, 20, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×