Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:14:48.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - EU labour law and the UK

from Section I - Labour law and Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Brian Bercusson
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction: the ‘British problem’

The United Kingdom occupies a singular position in EU labour law: over the last twenty-eight of its thirty-five years (80 per cent) as a Member State of the EU, British governments have provided the most consistent and effective opposition to the extension of rights for workers and trade unions in EU law. The Conservative government elected in May 1979, first under the leadership of Margaret Thatcher and then John Major, pursued a specific social and labour policy with remarkable consistency and determination throughout that period. The New Labour government elected in May 1997 was committed to a vision of labour law which, in the words of its leader, Tony Blair, ‘would leave British law the most restrictive on trade unions in the western world’.

The consequences of this continuous opposition to labour regulation for the UK's relationship to European labour law – both the impact of EC law on domestic labour law, and also the impact of the social and labour policies of UK governments on the development of EC labour law – have been unmistakable. The mutual impact can be described in terms of a reversal of policy flow: up to 1979, UK domestic labour law policy was influenced in important ways by EC labour law; since 1979, it is EU labour and social policy which has been heavily influenced by domestic UK social and labour policies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kilpatrick, C., ‘Has New Labour Reconfigured Employment Legislation?’, (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal 135 at p. 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Evelyn concluded: ‘The directive will require little or no change to the law in any Member State apart from the UK’ ‘Protection of Pregnancy and Maternity’, (1993) 22 Industrial Law Journal 63 at p. 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, M. and Kerr, A., ‘Acquiring Rights – Losing Power: A Case Study of Ministerial Resistance to the Impact of European Community Law’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepple, B. A. and Byre, A., ‘EEC Law in the UK: A New Approach’, (1989) 18 Industrial Law Journal129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColgan, A., ‘The Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002: Fiddling While Rome Burns?’ (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal 194, at pp. 198–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M., ‘The Social Charter Action Programme: Progress and Prospects’, (1991) 20 Industrial Law Journal 147, at pp. 148–9Google Scholar
Barnard, C., Deakin, S. and Hobbs, R., ‘Opting Out of the 48-hour Week: Employer Necessity or Individual Choice? An Empirical Study of the Operation of Article 18(1)(b) of the Working Time Directive in the UK’, (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal223–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gall, G., ‘The First Five Years of Britain's Third Statutory Union Recognition Procedure’, (2005) 34 Industrial Law Journal, 345–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. and Moore, S., ‘Union Recognition Agreements in the Shadow of the Law’,(2004) 34 Industrial Law Journal, 374–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercusson, B., ‘A European Agenda?’ in Ewing, K. (ed.), Employment Rights at Work: Reviewing the Employment Relations Act 1999, Institute of Employment Rights, 2001, 159 at pp. 172–85Google Scholar
Davies, Paul and Kilpatrick, Claire, ‘UK Worker Representation After Single Channel’ (2004) 33 Industrial Law Journal 121–51, at p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, Keith, ‘The Council of Europe's Social Charter of 18 October 1961: Britain and the 15th Cycle of Supervision’, (2001) 30 Industrial Law Journal409–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. and Ross, G., ‘Introduction: EMU and the European Social Model’, in Ross, A. and Martin, G. (eds.), Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 1–19 at p. 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×