Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:54:27.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Regulation or coordination: European climate policy between Scylla and Charybdis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Bernd Hansjürgens
Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One might have expected deliberations toward a European climate policy to have passed the stage of infancy long ago. It was in 1986 that the European Parliament passed its first resolution calling for measures to counteract the rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (European Parliament, 1986). With the recent signing of the Kyoto Protocol, European climate policy deliberations have become encapsulated in a global framework, but despite widely celebrated European leadership in this process, “internal” EU climate policy has scarcely matured to the level one would expect from an eighteen-year-long policy process. The stabilization target agreed in 1990 for CO2 emissions has been exchanged for a more complex and demanding 8 percent reduction target for six greenhouse gases, but the policies and measures required to accomplish the desired reductions remain fragmented and incoherent. That the European Union succeeded in achieving a stabilization of greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2000 was largely due to the combination of industrial restructuring in the former GDR and a phase-out of coal in the UK. Both the European Environment Agency and the International Energy Agency now warn that the temporary relief provided by these gratis effects is likely to be swallowed by substantial emission increases in most member states in the coming decade. The foreseen increases seem to reflect a lack of ability on the part of the European Union to develop a viable and effective climate policy on an internal basis.

This chapter addresses “domestic” European climate policy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Emissions Trading for Climate Policy
US and European Perspectives
, pp. 135 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, M. S. 1996. “The domestic politics of carbon-energy taxation,” in M. S. Andersen and D. Liefferink, The New Member States and the Impact on Environmental Policy. Final report to the Commission (DG-XII), part I. Aarhus: Dept. of Political Science, Aarhus University (http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/).
Andersen, M. S. 1998. “Environmental Policies in Europe,” in The European Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, vol. III, pp. 205–26.
Andersen, M. S., and Liefferink, D. 1997 (eds.). European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, M. S., and Massa, I. 2000. “Ecological modernization: origins, dilemmas and future directions,” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2: 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, P., and Barnes, I. 1999. Environmental Policy in the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
CEC 2001. “Economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction objectives for climate change.” Brussels (http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/climate_change/sectoral_objectives.htm).
Enevoldsen, M., and Brendstrup, S. 1998. “Considering feasibility and efficiency: the Danish mix of CO2 taxes and agreements,” in Andersen, M. S. and Sprenger, R.-U. (eds.). Market-Based Instruments for Environmental Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 148–75.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency 2002a. “Energy and environment in the European Union.” Environmental Issue Report no. 31, Copenhagen.
European Environment Agency2002b. “EU makes insufficient progress in reducing its environmental impact,” press release, Copenhagen (May 30).
European Parliament 1986. “Resolution on measures to counteract the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (the ‘greenhouse’ effect).” Official Journal C 255 (October 13), p. 0272.
Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and Brack, D. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Heritier, A. 1992. “Policy Netzwerkanalyse als Untersuchungsinstrument im europäischen Kontext,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 24: 432–47.Google Scholar
Heritier, A., Mingers, S., Knill, C., and Becka, M. 1994. Die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M. 1988. “Ökologische Modernisierung. Optionen und Restriktionen präventiver Umweltpolitik,” in Simonis, U. E. (ed.). Präventive Umweltpolitik. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Jepma, C. 2002. “Editor's note,” Magazine on the Kyoto Mechanisms 8: 2.Google Scholar
Leveque, F. 1996 (ed.). Environmental Policy in Europe: Industry, Competition and the Policy Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Liefferink, D., and Andersen, M. S. 1997 (eds.). The Innovation of EU Environmental Policy. Copenhagen and Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Mol, A. 1995. The Refinement of Production. Utrecht: Van Arkel.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 1995 (ed.). European Union: Power and Policy-Making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ringius, L. 1999. “Differentiation, leaders and fairness: negotiating climate commitments in the European Community,” International Negotiation 4: 133–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sors, A. 1996. “Foreword,” in Leveque (ed.), pp. xi–xii.
Weale, A., Pridham, G., Cini, M., Konstadakopulos, D., Porto, M., and Flinn, B. 2000. Environmental Governance in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallström, M. 2001. “Combating climate change: the EU strategy.” World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Speech 01/496 (October 26) (http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=SPEECH/01/496|0|RAPID&lg=EN).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×