Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T07:55:10.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Principles of sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Jeremy J. D. Greenwood
Affiliation:
British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK
Robert A. Robinson
Affiliation:
British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK
William J. Sutherland
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

Before one starts

Objectives

The definition of objectives is particularly important in studies of the abundance of animals or plants because it will determine whether one needs to make a full count of the individuals present in an area (or, at least, an estimate of that number) or whether an index of numbers is satisfactory. By an index, we mean a measurement that is related to the actual total number of animals or plants – such as the number of eggs of an insect species found on a sample of leaves of its host plant (as an index of numbers of adult insects) or the number of rabbit droppings in a sample area (as an index of the number of rabbits). Because accurate counts are extremely difficult to make, one may have to make do with an index even when a count would be preferable. Indeed, so long as an index is sufficient for one's purposes, a reliable index is preferable to an unreliable count.

The objectives will also determine the extent to which a population should be divided by sex, age or size in one's study: some work on the structure of communities may require only that total numbers of each species are known, whereas population dynamicists will often need to know the composition of the population by sex and age.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Census Techniques
A Handbook
, pp. 11 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, P. W., Austin, G. E., Rehfisch, M. M. et al. (in press). Identifying declines in waterbirds: the effects of missing data, population variability and count period on the interpretation of long-term survey data in the UK. Biological Conservation.
Austin, G. E., Jackson, S. F. & Mellan, H. J. (2004). WeBS Alerts 2000/2001: Changes in Numbers of Wintering Waterbirds in the United Kingdom, its Constituent Countries, Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). BTO Research Report No. 349. Thetford, British Trust for Ornithology.Google Scholar
Baillie, S. R., Marchant, J. H., Crick, H. Q. P.et al. (2005). Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: Their Conservation Status 2004. BTO Research Report No. 385. Thetford, British Trust for Ornithology (http://www.bto.org/birdtrends).Google Scholar
Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T. & Catchpole, E. A. (2002). Integrating mark–recapture–recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58, 540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besbeas, P., Freeman, S. N. & Morgan, B. J. T. (2005). The potential of integrated population modelling. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 47, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P.et al. (2001). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P.et al. (2004). Advanced Distance Sampling – Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. & Vickery, J. (2002). Declining farmland birds: evidence from large-scale monitoring studies in the UK. British Birds 95, 300–310.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Crawley, M. J. (1993). GLIM for Ecologists. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fewster, R. M., Buckland, S. T., Siriwardena, G. M., Baillie, S. R. & Wilson, J. D. (2000). Analysis of populations trends for farmland birds using generalised additive models. Ecology 81, 1970–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. J., Gregory, R. D., Gibbons, D. W.et al. (1995). Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology 9, 1425–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R. J., Noble, D. G., Smith, K. W. & Vanhinsbergh, D. (2005). Recent declines in populations of woodland birds in Britain: a review of possible causes. British Birds 98, 116–143.Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. J. (1978). Standing crop and pattern in pure stands of Mercurialis perennis and Rubus fruticosus in mixed deciduous woodland. Oikos 31, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, W. A. & Sauer, J. R. (1997). Estimation of the population trajectories from count data. Biometrics 53, 488–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, W. A. & Sauer, J. R. (1998). Estimating population change from count data: application to the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Ecological Applications 8, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. (1997.) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. 2nd edn. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Pannekoek, J. & Strien, A. (2001). TRIM 3.0 for Windows (Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data). Voorburg, Statistics Netherlands.Google Scholar
Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H. & Schenker, statistical N. (2003). Overlopping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance?Journal of Insect Science 3, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reason, P., Harris, S. & Cresswell, P. (1993). Estimating the impact of past persecution and habitat changes on the numbers of badgers Meles meles in Britain. Mammal Review 23, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royle, J. A., Dawson, D. K. & Bates, S. (2004). Modeling abundance effects in distance sampling. Ecology 85, 1591–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. K. (2002). Sampling, 2nd edn. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarPubMed
Urquhart, N. S. & Kincaid, T. M. (1999). Trend detection in repeated surveys of ecological responses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 4, 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×