Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:37:32.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Defining Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

Roy G. Farquharson
Affiliation:
Liverpool Women's Hospital
Mary D. Stephenson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Early Pregnancy , pp. 124 - 128
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christiansen, O. B., Steffensen, R., Nielsen, H. S. and Varming, K. (2008). “Multifactorial etiology of recurrent miscarriage and its scientific and clinical implications.” Gynecol Obstet Invest 66(4): 257–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malpas, P. (1938). “A study of abortion sequences.” J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 45(6): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirrat, G. M. (1990). “Recurrent miscarriage.” Lancet 336(8716): 673–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ASRM Practice Committee (2013). “Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.” Fertil Steril 99(1): 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, L. A. (2010). “Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules.” Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8: 102.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., O'Connor, J. F., et al. (1988). “Incidence of early loss of pregnancy.” N Engl J Med 319(4): 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macklon, N. S., Geraedts, J. P. and Fauser, B. C. (2002). “Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’ of early pregnancy loss.” Hum Reprod Update 8(4): 333–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolte, A. M., van Oppenraaij, R. H., Quenby, S., et al. and E. S. I. G. E. Pregnancy (2014). “Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.” Hum Reprod 29(5): 931–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nybo Andersen, A. M., Wohlfahrt, J., Christens, P., Olsen, J. and Melbye, M. (2000). “Maternal age and fetal loss: population-based register linkage study.” BMJ 320(7251): 1708–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Regan, L., Braude, P. R. and Trembath, P. L. (1989). “Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion.” BMJ 299(6698): 541–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifford, K., Rai, R. and Regan, L. (1997). “Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage.” Hum Reprod 12(2): 387–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, M., Kamper-Jorgensen, M., Nielsen, H. S., Lidegaard, O., Andersen, A. M. and Christiansen, O. B. (2012). “Prognosis for live birth in women with recurrent miscarriage: what is the best measure of success?” Obstet Gynecol 119(1): 3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolte, A. M., Nielsen, H. S., Moltke, I., et al. (2011). “A genome-wide scan in affected sibling pairs with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage suggests genetic linkage.” Mol Hum Reprod 17(6): 379–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, H. S., Steffensen, R., Varming, K., et al. (2009). “Association of HY-restricting HLA class II alleles with pregnancy outcome in patients with recurrent miscarriage subsequent to a firstborn boy.” Hum Mol Genet 18(9): 1684–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlaanderen, W. (2014). “Is recurrent miscarriage a useful clinical concept?” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(9): 848–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, O. B. (2014). “Recurrent miscarriage is a useful and valid clinical concept.” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(9): 852–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Boogaard, E., Cohn, D. M., Korevaar, J. C., et al. (2013). “Number and sequence of preceding miscarriages and maternal age for the prediction of antiphospholipid syndrome in women with recurrent miscarriage.” Fertil Steril 99(1): 188192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Boogaard, E., Kaandorp, S. P., Franssen, M. T., et al. (2010). “Consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status?” Hum Reprod 25(6): 1411–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaslow, C. R., Carney, J. L. and Kutteh, W. H. (2010). “Diagnostic factors identified in 1020 women with two versus three or more recurrent pregnancy losses.” Fertil Steril 93(4): 1234–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardi, L. A., Plunkett, B. A. and Stephenson, M. D. (2012). “Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation.” Fertil Steril 98(1):156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauniaux, E., Farquharson, R. G., Christiansen, O. B. and Exalto, N. (2006). “Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage.” Hum Reprod 21(9): 2216–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DSOG. (2009). “Abortus Habitualis, clinical guideline (Danish).” Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://gynobsguideline.dk/hindsgavl/Abortus%20habitualis%20Hindsgavl%20guideline%202007ret09.pdf.Google Scholar
RCOG. (2011). Recurrent Miscarriage, Investigation and Treatment of Couples (Green-top Guideline No. 17). London: RCOG.Google Scholar
CNGOF (2014). “Recommandations pour la pratique clinique “Les pertes de grossesse” (texte court) (French).” Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://www.cngof.asso.fr/data/RCP/CNGOF_2014_pertes_grossesse.pdf.Google Scholar
Minakami, H., Maeda, T., Fujii, T., et al. (2014). “Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition.” J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(6): 1469–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NVOG (2007). Guideline: Recurrent Miscarriage. Utrecht, The Netherlands: NVOG.Google Scholar
van den Boogaard, E., Hermens, R. P., Franssen, A. M., et al. (2013). “Recurrent miscarriage: do professionals adhere to their guidelines.” Hum Reprod 28(11): 2898–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiura-Ogasawara, M., Ozaki, Y. and Suzumori, N. (2014). “Management of recurrent miscarriage.” J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(5): 1174–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Boogaard, E., Hermens, R. P., Leschot, N. J., et al. (2011). “Identification of barriers for good adherence to a guideline on recurrent miscarriage.” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(2): 186–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, R. M., Branch, D. W., Goldenberg, R., Iams, J. D. and Klebanoff, M. A. (2011). “Nomenclature for pregnancy outcomes: time for a change.” Obstet Gynecol 118(6): 1402–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolte, A. M., Bernardi, L. A., Christiansen, O. B., et al. on behalf of the Eshre Special Interest Group, Early Pregnancy (2015). “Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group.” Hum Reprod 30(3): 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×