Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:45:13.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The Constitution in War and Emergency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Richard H. Fallon, Jr
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

[While] the Constitution protects against invasions of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact.

– Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez (1963)

War is hell.

– General William Tecumseh Sherman

ON APRIL 12, 1861, CONFEDERATE MILITARY FORCES FIRED on Fort Sumter, in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, and within a few days forced the surrender of Union soldiers stationed there. Confronted with the gravest crisis in American history, President Abraham Lincoln knew that he must convene the Congress of the United States – which was then out of session and absent from Washington, not due to return until the fall. But Congress was large, even then, and opinionated and divided. Lincoln therefore thought that he could manage the crisis better alone. So he called Congress into a special session but postponed the meeting date until July 4.

In the period between April 12 and July 4, Lincoln ordered a blockade of Southern ports – a step almost universally regarded as an act of war. Article I of the Constitution assigns the power “[t]o declare War” to Congress, which had not yet convened. Also before July 4, Lincoln called for volunteers for the army and ordered fifteen ships added to the navy, even though the Constitution specifically gives Congress, not the President, the powers to “raise and support Armies” and to “provide and maintain a Navy.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Dynamic Constitution
An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice
, pp. 315 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Farber, Daniel, Lincoln's Constitution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), ch. 6
Lincoln, Abraham, Selected Speeches and Writings 1859–1865 (New York: Library of America, 1989), 325–26, 321Google Scholar
Randall, James G., Constitutional Problems under Lincoln, rev. ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1951; originally published in 1926)Google Scholar
The Prize Cases, 67 U.S. 635 (1863)
Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (C.C.D.Md. 1861)
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 407 (1819)
Nowak, John E. and Rotunda, Ronald D., Constitutional Law (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2000), 255Google Scholar
Yoo, John C., “The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers,” 84 California Law Review 167, 242 (1996)Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart, War and Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 3–10Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, The National Security Constitution: Sharing Power after the Iran-Contra Affair (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990), 74–77Google Scholar
Campbell v. Clinton, 203 F. 3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)
Fallon, Richard H.., “Individual Rights and the Powers of Government,” 27 Georgia Law Review 343 (1993)Google Scholar
Neely, Mark E.., The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Warren, Earl, “The Bill of Rights and the Military,” 37 New York University Law Review 181, 192–93 (1962)Google Scholar
Halberstam, David, The Fifties (New York: Villard Books, 1993), 417–18Google Scholar
Cole, David, “The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism,” 38 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 1 (2003)Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A, “The Truth about Our Liberties,” 13 Responsive Community 4, 5 (2002)Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William H., All The Laws But One: Civil Liberties in Wartime (New York: Knopf, 1998)Google Scholar
Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304 (1946)
Analysis, A Legal,” CRS Report for Congress, April 15, 2002
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990); Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)
Neuman, Gerald L., Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976)
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×