Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T18:39:45.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The taxonomy of Cheirogaleidae: an ever-expanding species list

from Part I - Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Colin Groves
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Australia
Shawn M. Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Ute Radespiel
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Elke Zimmermann
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Get access

Summary

Introduction

So what is taxonomy?

Taxonomy is the way we order and classify the natural world. It is more of a specialised field than many people realise. Concepts like “how different does it have to be to be a distinct species/genus/family?” are not relevant; what we want to know is information about evolution and phylogeny.

The basic unit of taxonomy is the species. Species have a real existence: they are evolutionary lineages (de Queiroz, 2007). What we seek is evidence for these lineages, and the way to recognise them is what has been called the Phylogenetic Species Concept (Groves, 2001; Cotterill et al., 2014) which, following de Queiroz's (2007) analysis, would be better dubbed the Diagnosability Criterion. If one population (or group of populations) is consistently (diagnosably) different from others in heritable characters, this is absolute evidence that it forms a separate evolutionary lineage. The proposal that a given population, sample, cluster, or whatever, constitutes a species is therefore a testable hypothesis.

The so-called Higher Categories do not, on the other hand, have a real existence. Since Hennig (1950/1966) there has arisen a general consensus that a genus or a family must be monophyletic, but beyond that there is subjectivity. There has been a proposal to link these categories to time-depths (see, for example, Groves, 2001); thus, a genus should have been separated around the Miocene–Pliocene boundary, and a family should have been separated around the Oligocene–Miocene boundary. There has been surprisingly little discussion about this, which is distressing, because we are supposed to be doing science, and science is about testability.

The concept of Cheirogaleidae

Early zoologists took a while to recognise that dwarf and mouse lemurs are related to each other, rather than, for example, mouse lemurs being Madagascan galagos. More modern arrangements were beginning to be expressed by the mid-1800s. In Gray (1870), the genus Cheirogaleus was included in the Lemuridae, and two years later Gray (1872) recognised a tribe Cheirogaleina with more or less its present composition.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of Madagascar
Biology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae
, pp. 21 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andriantompohavana, R, Zaonarivelo, JR, Engberg, SE, et al. 2006. Mouse lemurs of north-western Madagascar with a description of a new species at Lokobe Special Reserve. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University, 259:1–24.Google Scholar
Blanco, MB, Godfrey, LR, Rakotondratsima, M, et al. 2009. Discovery of sympatric dwarf lemur species in the high altitude forest of Tsinjoarivo, Eastern Madagascar: implications for biogeography and conservation. Folia Primatologica 80:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1776. New Illustrations of Zoology, containing Fifty coloured Plates of new, curious and non-descript Birds, with a few Quadrupeds, Reptiles and Insects. Together with a short and Scientific Description of the same. B. White, London.
Buffon, GL LeClerc, Compte de. 1776. Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roy. 13. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.
Chatterjee, HJ, Ho, SYW, Barnes, I, Groves, C. 2009. Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9:259.Google Scholar
Cotterill, FPD, Taylor, PJ, Gippoliti, S, Bishop, JM, Groves, CP. 2014. Why one century of phenetics is enough: response to ‘are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?Systematic Biology63(5):819–832.Google Scholar
Cuozzo, FP, Rasoazanabary, E, Godfrey, LR, et al. 2013. Biological variation in a large sample of mouse lemurs from Amboasary, Madagascar: implications for interpreting variation in primate biology and paleobiology. Journal of Human Evolution 64:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainville, HMD de. 1841. Ostéographie des Primatès. Makis (Lemur). In Ostéographie des Mammifères. Baillière, Paris.
Queiroz, K de. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56:879–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, AR, Zijlstra, JS, Groves, C. 2012. Giant rabbits, marmosets, and British comedies: etymology of lemur names, part I. Lemur News 16:64–70.Google Scholar
Elliot, DG. 1912. Review of the Primates. 3 volumes. American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Forbes, HO. 1896. A Hand-book to the Primates. 2 volumes. Edward Lloyd Ltd, London.
Major, CI Forsyth. 1894. Über die Malagassischen Lemuriden-Gattungen Microcebus, Opolemur, und Chirogale. Novitates Zoologicae 1:2–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, E Geoffroy. 1796. Mémoire sur les rapports naturels des Makis Lemur, L. et description d'une espèce nouvelle de Mammifère. Magasin Encyclopétique 1:20–50.Google Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, E Geoffroy. 1812. Suite au Tableau des Quadrumanes. Second Famille. Lemuriens. Strepsirrhini. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 19:156–170.Google Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, E Geoffroy. 1828. Cours de l'Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Grandidier, A. 1867. Mammifères et oiseaux nouveaux découverts à Madagascar et décrits par M. Alfred Grandidier. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie 19:84–88.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1842. Descriptions of some new genera and fifty unrecorded species of Mammalia. Annals & Magazine of Natural History 10:255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, JE. 1870. Catalogue of Monkeys, Lemurs and Fruit-eating Bats in the Collection of the British Museum. British Museum Trustees, London.
Gray, JE. 1872. Notes on Propithecus, Indris, and other lemurs (Lemurina) in the British Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1872:846–859.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, LF, Weisrock, DW, Rasoloarison, RM, Yoder, AD, Kappeler, PM. 2009. Species delimitation in lemurs: multiple genetic loci reveal low levels of species diversity in the genus Cheirogaleus. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9:30.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, LF, Rasoloarison, RM, Kappeler, PM. 2010a. Morphometrics confirm taxonomic deflation in dwarf lemurs (Primates: Cheirogaleidae), as suggested by genetics. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 161:229–244.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, LF, Blanco, MB, Raharison, J-L, et al. 2010b. MtDNA and nDNA corroborate existence of sympatric dwarf lemur species at Tsinjoarivo, eastern Madagascar. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55:833–845.Google Scholar
Groves, CP. 1974. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Prosimians. In Martin, RD, Doyle, GA, Walker, AC (eds.), Prosimian Biology (pp 449–473). Duckworth, London.
Groves, CP. 1989. A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Groves, CP. 2000. The genus Cheirogaleus: unrecognised biodiversity in dwarf lemurs. International Journal of Primatology 21:943–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, CP. 2001. Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
Groves, CP, Tattersall, I. 1991. Geographical variation in the Fork-marked Lemur, Phaner furcifer (Primates, Cheirogaleidae). Folia Primatologica 56:39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, A. 1875. Notes on some mammals from Madagascar. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1875:78–80.Google Scholar
Hapke, A, Fietz, J, Nash, SD, et al. 2005. Biogeography of dwarf lemurs: genetic evidence for unexpected patterns in southeastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 26:873–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapke, A, Gligor, M, Rakotondranary, SJ, Rosencrantz, D, Zupke, O. 2011. Hybridisation of mouse lemurs: different patterns under different ecological conditions. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11:297.Google Scholar
Harper, F. 1940. The nomenclature and type localities of certain Old World mammals. Part 1. Journal of Mammalogy 41:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, KL, Rasoazanabary, E, Machlin, E, Godfrey, LR, Yoder, AD. 2006. Incongruence between genetic and morphological diversity in Microcebus griseorufus of Beza Mahafaly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6:98.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1950. Phylogenetic Systematics. (English translation 1966.)
Hill, WCO. 1953. Primates, Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy, I – Strepsirrhini, a Monograph. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Kappeler, PM, Rasoloarison, RM, Razafimanantsoa, L, Walter, L, Roos, C. 2005. Morphology, behaviour and molecular evolution of giant mouse lemurs (Mirza spp.) Gray, 1870, with description of a new species. Primate Report 71:3–26.Google Scholar
Kollmann, M. 1910. Note sur les genres Chirogale et Microcebus. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 16:301–304.Google Scholar
Lei, R, Frasier, CL, McLain, AT, et al. 2014. Revision of Madagascar's dwarf lemurs (Cheirogaleidae: Cheirogaleus): designation of species, candidate species status and geographic boundaries based on molecular and morphological data. Primate Conservation 28:1–8.Google Scholar
Lei, R, McLain, AT, Frasier, CL, et al. 2015. A new species in the genus Cheirogaleus (Cheirogaleidae). Primate Conservation 29:1–12.Google Scholar
Lesson, R-P. 1829. Observations sur quelques Mammifères conserves dans le Cabinet de la Société de Zoologie, par N.A.Vigors and Thomas Horsfield (Zoological Journal; no XIII, avril–juin 1828, p. 105). Bulletin des Sciences Naturelles et de Géologie 16:453–455.Google Scholar
Lesson, R-P. 1840. Species des Mammifères Bimanes et Quadrumanes; suivi d'un Mémoire sur les Oryctéropes. J.-B. Baillière, Paris.
Louis, EE, Coles, MS, Andriantompohavana, R, et al. 2006. Revision of the mouse lemurs (Microcebus) of eastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 27:347–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, EE, Engberg, SE, McGuire, SM, et al. 2008. Revision of the mouse lemurs, Microcebus (Primates, Lemuriformes), of northern and northwestern Madagascar with descriptions of two new species at Montagne d'Ambre National Park and Antafondro Classified Forest. Primate Conservation 23:19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, JC, Silvestro, D, Génin, F, DelPero, M. 2013. Seeing the wood through the trees: the current state of higher systematics in the Strepsirhini. Folia Primatologica 84:201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, JA. 2006. Systems or species? Approaches to conservation for the 21st century. Integrative Zoology 2:86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, B, Albignac, R. 1991. Rediscovery of Allocebus trichotis Günther 1875 (primates) in Northeast Madagascar. Folia Primatologica 56:57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, JF. 1777. Various Subjects of Natural History wherein are delineated Birds, Animals, and many curious Plants: with the Parts of Fructification of each plant, all of which are drawn and coloured from Nature. Letterpress, London.
Mittermeier, RA, Louis, EE, Richardson, M, et al. 2010. Lemurs of Madagascar. Third edition. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Mivart, StG. 1873. On Lepilemur and Cheirogaleus, and on the zoological rank of the Lemuroidea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1873:484–510.Google Scholar
Olivieri, G, Zimmermann, E, Randrianambinina, B, et al. 2007. The ever-increasing diversity in mouse lemurs: three new species in north and northwestern Madagascar. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43:309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorini, J, Martin, RD, Ehresmann, P, Zimmermann, E, Forstner, MRJ. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the lemur family (Primates) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19:45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, P, Johnson, WE, Roos, C, et al. 2011. A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genetics 7(3):e1001342.Google Scholar
Peters, WCH. 1852. Naturwissenschaftliche Reise nach Mozambique auf befehl Seiner Majestät des Königs Friedrich Wilhelm IV in den Jahren 1842 bis 1848 ausgeführt. Zoologie. I. Säugethiere. G. Reimer, Berlin.
Petter, J-J. 1962. Recherches sur l'écologie et l'éthologie des lémuriens malgaches. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle N.S., ser. A, Zoologie 27:1–146.Google Scholar
Petter, J-J. 1965. The lemurs of Madagascar. In DeVore, I (ed.), Primate Behaviour: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes (pp. 292–319). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Petter, J-J, Albignac, R, Rumpler, Y. 1977. Faune de Madagascar, 44: Mammifères Lémuriens (Primates Prosimiens). ORSTOM/CNRS, Paris.
Petter-Rousseaux, A, Petter, J-J. 1967. Contribution à la systematique des Cheirogaleinae (lemuriens malgaches), Allocebus, gen.nov., pour Cheirogaleus trichotis Günther 1875. Mammalia 31:574–582.Google Scholar
Radespiel, U, Olivieri, G, Rasolofoson, DW, et al. 2008. Exceptional diversity of mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) in the Makira region with the description of one new species. American Journal of Primatology 70:1033–1046.Google Scholar
Radespiel, U, Ratsimbazafy, JH, Rasoloharijaona, S, et al. 2012. First indications of a highland specialist among mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) and evidence for a new mouse lemur species from eastern Madagascar. Primates 53:157–170.Google Scholar
Rakotoarison, N, Zimmermann, H, Zimmermann, E. 1996. First discovery of the hairy-eared dwarf lemur (Allocebus trichotis) in a highland rain forest of eastern Madagascar. Folia Primatologica 68:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasoloarison, RM, Goodman, SM, Ganzhorn, JU. 2000. Taxonomic revision of mouse lemurs (Microcebus) in the western portions of Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 21:963–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasoloarison, RM, Weisrock, DW, Yoder, AD, Rakotondravony, D, Kappeler, PM. 2013. Two new species of mouse lemurs (Cheirogaleidae: Microcebus) from Eastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 34:455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpler, Y. 1974. Cytogenetic contributions to a new classification of lemurs. In Martin, RD, Doyle, GA, Walker, AC (eds.), Prosimian Biology (pp. 865–869). Duckworth, London.
Saban, R. 1963. Contribution à l'étude de l'os temporal des Primates. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle N.S., ser. A, Zoologie, 29:1–377.Google Scholar
Schmid, J, Kappeler, PM. 1994. Sympatric mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) in western Madagascar. Folia Primatologica 63:162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, JH, Tattersall, I. 1985. Evolutionary relationships of living lemurs and lorises (Mammalia, Primates) and their potential affinities with European Eocene Adapidae. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History New York, 60, part 1.Google Scholar
Schwarz, E. 1931. A revision of the genera and species of Madagascar Lemuridae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931:399–426.Google Scholar
Simpson, GG, Roe, A, Lewontin, RC. 1960. Quantitative Zoology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., Inc., New York.
Szalay, FS, Katz, CC. 1973. Phylogeny of lemurs, galagos and lorises. Folia Primatologica 19:88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1982. The Primates of Madagascar. Columbia University Press, New York.
Tattersall, I, Schwartz, JH. 1974. Craniodental morphology and the systematics of the Malagasy lemurs (Primates, Prosimii). Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History New York 52, part 3.Google Scholar
Thalmann, U. 2000. Greater dwarf lemurs from the Bongolava (central western Madagascar). Lemur News 5:33–35.Google Scholar
Thiele, D, Razafimahatratra, E, Hapke, A. 2013. Discrepant partitioning of genetic diversity in mouse lemurs and dwarf lemurs – biological reality or taxonomic bias?Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69:593–609.Google Scholar
Vigors, NA, Horsfield, T. 1828. Observations on some of the Mammalia contained in the Museum of the Zoological Society. Zoological Journal 4:105–113.Google Scholar
Vigors, NA, Horsfield, T. 1829. Notes respecting some species of Mammalia referred to by Mr. Vigors and Dr. Horsfield in the XIIIth No. of this Journal. Zoological Journal 5:134–141.Google Scholar
Wagner, JA. 1840. Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur, mit Beschreibungen von D. Johann Christian Daniel von Schreber, Fortgesetzt von Dr. Johann Andreas Wagner. Supplementband 1. Erlangen: Expedition des Schreber'schen Säugthier- und des Esper'schen Schmetterlingswerkes.
Yablokov, AV. 1966. Variability of Mammals. Amerind, New Delhi.
Yoder, AD. 1992. The applications and limitations of ontogenetic comparisons for phylogeny reconstruction: the case of the strepsirrhine internal carotid artery. Journal of Human Evolution 23:183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, AD. 1994. Relative position of the Cheirogaleidae in strepsirrhine phylogeny: a comparison of morphological and molecular methods and results. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94:25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, AD, Heckman, KL. 2006. Mouse lemur phylogeography revises a model of ecogeographic constraint in Madagascar. In Lehman, SM and Fleagle, JG (eds.), Primate Biogeography (pp. 255–268). Springer, New York.
Yoder, AD, Rasoloarison, RM, Goodman, SM, et al. 2000. Remarkable species diversity in Malagasy mouse lemurs (Primates, Microcebus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97:11325–11330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, AD, Burns, MM, Génin, F. 2002. Molecular evidence of reproductive isolation in sympatric sibling species of mouse lemurs. International Journal of Primatology 23:1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, E, Cepok, S, Rakotoarison, N, Zietemann, V, Radespiel, U. 1998. Sympatric mouse lemurs in north-west Madagascar: a new rufous mouse lemur species (Microcebus ravelobensis). Folia Primatologica 69:106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×