Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:57:13.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice

Are We Putting the Cart before the Horse?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mark S. Schlager
Affiliation:
SRI International
Judith Fusco
Affiliation:
SRI International
Sasha Barab
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rob Kling
Affiliation:
Indiana University
James H. Gray
Affiliation:
SRI International, Stanford, California
Get access

Summary

Practice, then, both shapes and supports learning. We wouldn't need to labor this point so heavily were it not that unenlightened teaching and training often pulls in the opposite direction.

Brown & Duguid (2000, p. 129)

In their book The Social Life of Information, Brown and Duguid (2000) analyze examples of learning in the context of professional practice and the ways in which information technology supports or fails to support professional learning. Failure is related to neglect of ways in which people learn, their resourcefulness in solving problems, and the communities of practice in which they participate. As the opening quotation suggests, training (and technology that supports a training model of learning) tends to pull professionals away from their practice, focusing on information about a practice rather than on how to put that knowledge into practice. Only by engaging in work and talking about it from inside the practice can one learn to be a competent practitioner. They conclude that “practice is an effective teacher and the community of practice an ideal learning environment” (p. 127).

Over the past several years, we have been developing and refining the sociotechnical infrastructure of a virtual environment called Tapped In® (www.tappedin.org) that is intended to support the online activities of a large and diverse community of education professionals. We have described the design principles that underlie our efforts and documented how educators have used the environment for their own purposes and in the context of formal professional development (Schlager & Schank, 1997; Schank, Fenton, Schlager, & Fusco, 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (2000). Log on or lose out. Washington, DC: AACTE Publications
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (this volume). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community
Blanton, W. E., Mooreman, G., & Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education, 23 (pp. 235–275). Washington, DC: AERA
Blumenfeld, P. C., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., &. Marx, R. W. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (1998, August). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. Draft for presentation at the American Political Science Association, September 5, Atlanta, GA
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1) 40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education 24 (pp. 249–305). Washington, DC: AERA
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Solomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational consideration (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, T. B., Shields, P. M., & Zucker, A. A. (1998, March). The SSIs and professional development for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
Cothrel, J., & Williams, R. (1999). Online communities: Helping them form and grow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1997, June). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do. Available online at http://www.negp.gov/reports/highstds.htm
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (Eds.) (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Derry, S. J., Gance, S., Gance, L. L., & Schlager, M. S. (2000). Toward assessment of knowledge building practices in technology-mediated work group interactions. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II (pp. 29–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany, J., Adelman, N., & Zucker, A. (2000, January). Evaluation of key factors impacting the effective use of technology in schools. Subtask 5: Professional development study literature review. Draft report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
Dunlap, D. R., Neale, D. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2000). Teacher collaboration in a networked community. Educational Technology and Society 3(3) (pp. 442–454), Special Issue on On-Line Collaborative Learning EnvironmentsGoogle Scholar
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute
Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 265–291). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Evertson, C. M., Smithey, M. W., & Hough, B. W. (2000). Exploring the use of Web-based conferences for new teacher professional development. Final Report, NPEAT Project 2.4.3. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit
Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1–2), 63–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, A., Konold, C., & Coulter, B. (2000). Network science a decade later: The Internet and classroom learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Finholt, T. A., Lewis, S. A., & Mott, W. H. (1995). Distance learning in the Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory. Unpublished manuscript. Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Fusco, J., Gehlbach, H., & Schlager, M. (2000). Assessing the impact of a large-scale online teacher professional development community. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (pp. 2178–2183)
Gallego, M. A., Hollingsworth, S., & Whitenack, D. A. (2001). Relational knowing in the reform of educational cultures. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 240–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001, Winter).What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, L., Fishman, B., & Pea, R. (1998). The CoV is project: Building a large-scale science education testbed. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1–2), 59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. M. N. Lin (Ed.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105–130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Gray, J., & Tatar, D. (this volume). Sociocultural analysis of online professional development: A case study of personal, interpersonal, community, and technical aspects
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2000, April). In pursuit of teacher community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans
Hawkins, J. (1996). Dilemmas. In C. Fisher, D. C. Dwyer, & K. Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology (pp. 33–50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Hewitt, J. (this volume). An exploration of community in a Knowledge Forum classroom: An activity system analysis
Hoadley, C. M., & Pea, R. D. (2002). Finding the ties that bind: Tools in support of a knowledge-building community. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 321–354). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Honey, M., Carrigg, F., & Hawkins, J. (1998). Union City Online: An architecture for networking and reform. In C. Dede (Ed.), The 1998 ASCD yearbook: Learning with technology (pp. 121–139). Alexandria, VA: ASCD
Koku, E. F., & Wellman, B. (this volume). Scholarly networks as learning communities: The case of TechNet
Koppich, J., Asher, C., & Kerchner, C. (2002). Developing careers, building a profession: The Rochester Career in Teaching plan. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lieberman, A. (1996). Creating intentional learning communities. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 51–55Google Scholar
Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1999). Networks and reform in American education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 292–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-;Bass
Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536Google Scholar
Little, J. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151Google Scholar
Little, J. W. (2001, September). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Paper presented at the conference of International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching, Faro, Portugal
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1998). New technologies of teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 1–24Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Mwanza, D. (2001). Where theory meets practice: A case for an Activity Theory based methodology to guide computer system design. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Proceedings of INTERACT'2001: Eighth IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Oxford, UK: IOS Press
National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it's too late. U.S. Department of Education. Available online at www.ed.gov/americacounts/glenn
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author
Oldenburg, R. (1997). The great good place. New York: Marlowe
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), Panel on Educational Technology. (1997, March). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K–12 education in the United States. Available online at http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rényi, J. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. NEA Foundation for the Improvement of Education. Available online at http://nfie.org/publications/takecharge.htm
Riel, M., & Becker, H. (2000, April). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. AERA presentation, New Orleans. Available online at http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/aera
Riel, M., & Polin, L. (this volume). Online learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments
Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Schank, P., Fenton, J., Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (1999). From MOO to MEOW: Domesticating technology for online communities. In C. Hoadley (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 (pp. 518–526). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumCrossRef
Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (1998). Cornerstones for an online community of education professionals. IEEE Technology and Society, 17, 15–21, 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlager, M., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Schlager, M. S., & Schank, P. K. (1997). TAPPED IN: A new online teacher community concept for the next generation of Internet technology. In Proceedings of CSCL 97, The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 230–241). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumCrossRef
Schwen, T. M., & Hara, N. (this volume). Communities of practice: A metaphor for online design?
Scribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H., & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, P. M., Esch, C., Young, V. M., & Humphrey, D. C. (2000). White paper on teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
Smylie, M. A., Allensworth, E., Greenberg, R. C., Harris, R., & Luppescu, S. (2001). Teacher professional development in Chicago: Supporting effective practice. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (1999). Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University
Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 17–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Tatar, D. G., Gray, J., & Fusco, J. (2002). Rich social interaction in a synchronous online community for learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 633–634). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumCrossRef
Maanen, J., & Barley, S. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287–365Google Scholar
Web-based Education Commission. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Washington, DC: Author
Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 169–194). London: Routledge
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, 24 (pp. 173–209). Washington, DC: AERACrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×