Akerlof, G., ‘The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty
and the market mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of
Economics 84, 3 (1970): 488–500.
ALI, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations
(Proposed Final Draft), Philadelphia:
ALI (1992).
ALI, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and
Recommendations, 2 vols.,
Philadelphia: ALI
(1994).
Allen, W., Kraakman, R., and Subramaniam, G., Cases and Commentaries on the Law of Business Organization,
3rd edn., New York: Aspen
Publishers (2009).
Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, B., and Nolan, R., ‘Private enforcement of corporate law: an empirical comparison
of the UK and US’, Journal of Empirical Legal
Studies 6, 4 (2009): 687–722.
Armour, J., Hansmann, H., and Kraakman, R., ‘Agency problems and legal strategies’,
in Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., and Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional
Approach, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press
(2009): 35–54.
Armour, J., and Lele, P., ‘Law, finance, and politics: the case of
India’, Law and Society Review 43, 3 (2009): 491–526.
Aronson, B., ‘Reconsidering the importance of law in Japanese corporate
governance: evidence from the Daiwa Bank shareholder derivative case’,
Cornell International Law Journal 36, 1 (2003): 11–58.
Bainbridge, S., Corporation Law and Economics, New
York: Foundation Press
(2002).
Bainbridge, S., Corporate Law, 2nd edn., New
York: Foundation Press
(2009).
Bartholomew, G., ‘The Singapore legal system’, in
Hassan, R. (ed.), Singapore: Society in Transition,
Oxford University Press (1976):
84–112.
Bartley, R., ‘The case for optimism: the West should believe in
itself’, Foreign Affairs 72, 4 (1993): 15–18.
Baums, T., ‘Empfiehlt sich eine Neuregelung des aktienrechtlichen
Anfechtungs- und Organhaftungsrechts, insbesondere der Klagemöglichkeiten der
Aktionäre? Gutachten F zum 63. DJT’ [‘Is a reform of the rules on
director liability and litigation rights of shareholders advisable? Expert opinion F for the
63rd German conference of jurists’], in Kleinhenz, G., and Hanau, P. (eds.), Verhandlung des 63. Deutschen Juristentages [Proceedings of the
63rd German Conference of Jurists], Munich:
C. H. Beck (2000): F22–F30.
Baxter, C., ‘The true spirit of Foss v.
Harbottle’, Northern
Ireland Legal Quarterly 38, 1 (1987): 6–45.
Bebchuk, L., Kraakman, R., and Triantis, G., ‘Stock pyramids, cross-ownership and dual class equity: the
creation and agency costs of separating control from cash flow rights’,
in Morck, R. (ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership,
University of Chicago Press (2000):
295–315.
Becker, M., Verwaltungskontrolle durch Gesellschafterrechte [Control of Management
by Shareholder Rights], Tübingen:
Mohr Siebeck (1997).
Beijing yule xinbao [Beijing Recreation News], ‘
Gao fayuan fuyuanzhang Li
Guoguang biaoshi: xiao gudong gao da gudong fayuan ying shouli’
[‘Supreme People’s Court vice-president Li Guoguang indicates that courts should
accept suits by small shareholders against large shareholders’],
Beijing yule xinbao, 12 December (
2002) [available at
http://news.sohu.com/58/64/news204906458.shtml].
Bell, G., ‘Harmonisation of contract law in Asia: harmonising regionally
or adopting global harmonisations – the example of the CISG’,
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies December
(2005): 362–72.
Berglof, E., and
von Thadden, E.-L., ‘The changing corporate governance paradigm: implications for transition and
developing countries’, paper presented at annual World Bank conference on development
economics, Washington, DC, 30 April (
1999) [available at
http://ssrn.com/abstract=183708].
Berkhan, M., ‘The derivative action in Australia and New Zealand: will the
statutory provisions improve shareholders’ enforcement rights?’,
Bond Law Review 10, 1 (1998): 74–100.
Bertrand, A., and Coibon, A., ‘Shareholder suits against the directors of a company, against
other shareholders and against the company itself under Belgian law’,
European Company and Financial Law Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 270–306.
Bezzenberger, G., ‘§ 147’, in Hopt, K., and Wiedemann, H. (eds.), Großkommentar AktG [Comprehensive Commentary to the
AktG], 4th edn., Berlin: De
Gruyter (2008): 140–4.
Bezzenberger, G., and Bezzenberger, T., ‘§ 148’, in Hopt, K., and Wiedemann, H. (eds.), Großkommentar AktG [Comprehensive Commentary to the
AktG], 4th edn., Berlin: De
Gruyter (2008): 145–8.
Bezzenberger, G., and Bezzenberger, T., ‘§ 149’, in Hopt, K., and Wiedemann, H. (eds.), Großkommentar AktG [Comprehensive Commentary to the
AktG], 4th edn., Berlin: De
Gruyter (2008): 149–52.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., and Welch, I., ‘Theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as
informational cascades’, Journal of Political
Economy 100, 5 (1992): 992–1026.
Black, B., Cheffins, B., and Klausner, M., ‘Shareholder suits and outside director liability: the case of Korea’,
Law Working Paper no. 47/2005, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels
(2005).
Black, B., and Kraakman, R., ‘A self-enforcing model of corporate
law’, Harvard Law Review 109, 8 (1996): 1911–82.
Boyle, A., ‘The minority shareholder in the nineteenth century: a study
in Anglo-American legal history’, Modern Law
Review 28, 3 (1965): 317–29.
Boyle, A., ‘The derivative action in company law’,
Journal of Business Law 2 (1969): 120–34.
Boyle, A., Minority Shareholders’ Remedies,
Cambridge University Press (2002).
Braun, H., and Strothotte, C., ‘Neue Entwicklungen zur “derivative action” nach
dem Companies Act 2006’ [‘New developments regarding “derivative
actions” under the Companies Act 2006’], Recht
der Internationalen Wirtschaft 56, 7 (2010): 424–36.
Cao, K., ‘Guanyu zhonghua renmin gongheguo
gongsifa (‘xiugai caoan’) de shuoming’ [‘Explanation
regarding ‘Company Law of the PRC (amended draft)’], in Gui, M. (ed.), Zhonghua renmin gongheguo zhengquanfa, zhonghua renmin gongheguo
gongsifa xin jiu tiaowen duizhao jianming jiedu [Straightforward Reading and New–Old
Comparison of the Securities Law and Company Law of the People’s Republic of
China], Beijing: Zhongguo minzhu
fazhi chubanshe [China Democracy and Legal System Press] (2005):
525–45.
Chakrabarti, R., ‘Corporate governance in India: evolution and challenges’, working
paper, Indian School of Business, Hyderabad (
2005) [available at
http://ssrn.com/abstract=649857].
Chandrachud, Y., and Dugar, S., Ramaiya’s Guide to the Companies Act, 14th edn.,
Nagpur: Wadhwa & Co.
(1998).
Chang, J., and Shin, H.-H.., ‘Family ownership and performance in Korean
conglomerates’, Pacific-Basin Finance
Journal, 15, 4 (2007):
329–52.
Cheffins, B., Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation,
Oxford: Clarendon Press
(1997).
Cheffins, B., and Black, B., ‘Outside director liability across
countries’, Texas Law Review 84, 6 (2005): 1385–480.
Chen, I. (trans.), The Book of Filial Duty, Whitefish,
MT: Kessinger Publishing
(2010).
Chew, E., and Lee, E. (eds.), A History of Singapore,
Singapore: Oxford University
Press (1991).
Chew, M., Minority Shareholders’ Rights and Remedies, 2nd
edn., Singapore: LexisNexis
(2007).
Choi, S., and Pritchard, A., Securities Regulation: Cases and Analysis, 2nd edn.,
Eagan, MN: Foundation Press
(2008).
Choo, K., ‘The statutory derivative action in Singapore: a critical and
comparative examination’, Bond Law
Review 13, 1 (2001): 64–94.
Choper, J., Coffee, J., and Gilson, R., Cases and Materials on Corporations, 7th edn.,
New York: Aspen Publishing
(2008).
Claessens, S., ‘The separation of ownership and control in east Asian
corporations’, Journal of Financial
Economics 58, 1/2 (2000): 81–112.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L., ‘The separation of ownership and control in east Asian
corporations’, Journal of Financial
Economics 58, 1/2 (2000): 81–112.
Clark, R., Corporate Law, Boston:
Little Brown (1986).
Clarke, D., ‘The private attorney-general in China: potential and
pitfalls’, Washington University Global Studies Law
Review 8, 2 (2009): 241–55.
CLRFC, Report of the Company Legislation and Regulatory Framework
Committee, Singapore National Printers
(2002).
Coffee, J., ‘Understanding the plaintiff’s attorney: the
implications of economic theory for private enforcement of law through class and derivative
actions’, Columbia Law Review 86, 4 (1986): 669–727.
Coffee, J., ‘The mandatory/enabling balance in corporate law: an essay on
the judicial role’, Columbia Law Review 89, 6 (1989): 1618–91.
Coffee, J., ‘New myths and old realities: the American Law Institute faces
the derivative action’, The Business
Lawyer 48, 4 (1993): 1407–41.
Coffee, J., ‘The rise of dispersed ownership: the roles of law and the
state in the separation of ownership and control’, Yale
Law Journal 111, 1 (2001): 1–82.
Company Law Board, ‘Consolidated statement of petitions/applications received, disposed of and
pending for the period w.e.f. 01–04–2010 to 31–03–2011’,
Government of India, New Delhi (
2011) [available at
http://clb.nic.in/2k10-2k11.htm].
Company Law Committee, Report of the Company Law Committee, Cmnd 1749,
London: Her Majesty’s Stationery
Office (1962).
Conyon, M., ‘Corporate governance in Singapore: a case study in
international corporate governance’, in Mallin, C. (ed.), International Corporate Governance: A Case Study
Approach, Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar (2006): 187–217.
Cox, J., ‘The social meaning of shareholder
suits’, Brooklyn Law Review 65, 1 (1999): 3–45.
Cox, J., and Hazen, T., Corporation, 2nd edn., New
York: Aspen Publishing
(2003).
Cox, J., and Thomas, R., ‘Mapping the American shareholder litigation experience: a
survey of empirical studies of the enforcement of US securities law’,
European Company and Financial Law Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 146–203.
Cox, J., and Thomas, R., ‘Common challenges facing shareholder suits in Europe and the
United States’, European Company and Financial Law
Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 348–57.
Daines, R., and
Jones, C., ‘Mandatory disclosure, information asymmetry and liquidity: the effect of the
1934 act’, working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT (
2007) [available
at
www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/CBL/34_Yale.pdf].
Davies, P., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law,
7th edn., London: Sweet &
Maxwell (2003).
Davies, P., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law,
8th edn., London: Sweet &
Maxwell (2008).
Davis, K., ‘The forgotten derivative suit’,
Vanderbilt Law Review 61, 2 (2008): 387–451.
De Wulf, H., ‘Direct shareholder suits for damages based on reflective
losses’, in Grundmann, S., Haar, B., Merkt, H., Mülbert, P., and Wellenhofer, M. (eds.), Festschrift für Klaus J. Hopt zum 70. Geburtstag am 24.
August 2010: Unternehmen, Markt und Verantwortung [Festschrift for Klaus J. Hopt on his 70th
Birthday on 24th August 2010: Firms, Markets and Responsibility],
Berlin: De Gruyter
(2010): 1537–64.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Levine, R., ‘Stock market development and financial intermediaries’, Policy
Research Working Paper no. 1462, World Bank, Washington, DC (1995).
DeMott, D., Shareholder Derivative Actions: Law and Practice,
Deerfield, IL: Clark, Boardman,
Callaghan (1990).
Deng, J., ‘Building an investor-friendly shareholder derivative lawsuit
system in China’, Harvard International Law
Journal 46, 2 (2005): 347–85.
Dickerson, R., Howard, J., and Getz, L., Proposals for a New Business Corporations Law for Canada,
2 vols., Ottawa: Information
Canada (1971).
Dine, J., and Cheffins, B., ‘Shareholder remedies: lessons from
Canada’, Company Lawyer 13, 5 (1992): 89–95.
Doe, J., ‘Corporate governance in Hong Kong’,
International Corporate and Commercial Law Review 9, 10 (1998): 281–90.
Doralt, W., Managerpflichten in der englischen Limited [Duties of Managers in the
English Limited], Vienna:
Linde (2011).
Dowling, J., and Yap, C.-F., Modern Developments in Behavioral Economics,
London: World Scientific
(2007).
Drury, P., ‘The relative nature of a shareholder’s right to
enforce the company contract’, Cambridge Law
Journal 45, 2 (1986): 219–46.
Du Plessis, J., ‘Reverberations after the HIH and other recent Australian
corporate collapses: the role of ASIC’, Australian
Journal of Corporate Law 15, 8 (2003): 225–45.
Du Plessis, J., Hargovan, A., and Bagaric, M., Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance, 2nd edn.,
Cambridge University Press (2011).
Eckert, G., Grechenig, K., and Stremitzer, A., ‘Ökonomische Analyse der Organhaftung’
[‘Economic analysis of director liability’], in Kalss, S. (ed.), Vorstandshaftung in 15 europäischen Ländern
[Director Liability in 15 European Countries],
Vienna: Linde
(2005): 95–163.
Eng, L., and Mak, Y., ‘Corporate governance and voluntary
disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public
Policy 22, 4 (2003): 325–45.
Enriques, L., ‘Book review: Reinier Kraakman et al., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional
Approach’, American Journal of Comparative
Law 52, 4 (2004): 1011–36.
Enriques, L., Hertig, G., and Kanda, H., ‘Related-party transactions’, in
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., and Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional
Approach, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press
(2009): 153–82.
Ferrarini, G., and Giudici, P., ‘Financial scandals and the role of private enforcement: the
Parmalat case’, in Armour, J., and McCahery, J. (eds.), After Enron: Improving Corporate Law and Modernising Securities
Regulation in Europe and the US, Portland, OR:
Hart Publishing (2006):
159–214.
Fischel, D., and Bradley, M., ‘The role of liability rules and the derivative suit in
corporate law: a theoretical and empirical analysis’,
Cornell Law Review 71, 2 (1986): 261–97.
Fleischer, H., ‘Das Gesetz zur Unternehmensintegrität und
Modernisierung des Anfechtungsrechts’ [‘The act regarding the integrity of
companies and modernization of shareholder rights to bring actions’],
Neue Juristische Wochenzeitschrift 58, 49 (2005): 3525–30.
Fraser, A., ‘The Companies Act 1993: shareholders’
remedies’, Auckland University Law
Review 7, 3 (1994): 739–45.
French, D., Mayson, S., and Ryan, C., Mayson, French and Ryan on Company Law, 27th edn.,
Oxford University Press (2010).
Fujita, T., ‘Transformation of the management liability regime in Japan in
the wake of the 1993 revision’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 15–35.
Fukuda, A., ‘Kabunushi daihyou soshou wa ko-pore-to gabanansu no shudan to
shite yuko ka’ [‘Are derivative suits an efficient corporate governance
tool?’], in Kosano, H., and Honda, Y. (eds.), Gendai no Kin’yuu to Seisaku [Modern Finance and
Policy], Tokyo: Nippon
Hyouron-sha (2000):
347–89.
Geis, G., ‘Can independent blockholding play much of a role in Indian
corporate governance?’, Corporate Governance Law
Review 3, 3 (2007): 283–312.
Gilson, R., and Kraakman, R., ‘The mechanisms of market efficiency’,
Virginia Law Review 70, 4 (1984): 549–644.
Ginsburg, T., and Hoetker, G., ‘The unreluctant litigant? An empirical analysis of
Japan’s turn to litigation’, Journal of Legal
Studies 35, 1 (2006): 31–59.
Girvin, S., Frisby, S., and Hudson, A., Charlesworth’s Company Law, 18th edn.,
London: Sweet & Maxwell
(2010).
Giudici, P., ‘Representative legislation in Italian capital markets:
Italian derivative suits and (if ever) securities class actions’,
European Company and Financial Law Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 246–69.
Goldberg, G., ‘The controversy on the section 20 contract
revisited’, Modern Law Review 48, 2 (1985): 158–66.
Goo, S. H., Minority Shareholders’ Protection,
London: Cavendish Publishing
(1994).
Goo, S. H., ‘Multiple derivative action and common law derivative action
revisited: a tale of two jurisdictions’, Journal of
Corporate Law Studies 10, 1 (2010): 255–64.
Goo, S. H., and Carver, A., Corporate Governance: The Hong Kong Debate,
Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell
Asia (2003).
Government of Singapore, Singapore: The Next Lap,
Singapore: Times Editions
(1991).
Government of Singapore, Report of the Select Committee on the Companies (Amendment) Bill (Bill
no. 33/92), Singapore National Printers
(1993).
Green, S., China’s Stockmarket: A Guide to Its Progress, Players, and
Prospects, London: Profile
Books (2003).
Gregory, R., ‘The section 20 contract’,
Modern Law Review 44, 5 (1981): 526–40.
Grelon, B., ‘Shareholders’ lawsuits against the management of a
company and its shareholders under French law’, European
Company and Financial Law Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 205–18.
Großfeld, B., Aktiengesellschaft, Unternehmenskonzentration und Kleinaktionär
[Stock Corporation, Concentrated Ownership and Minority Shareholders],
Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr
(1968).
Guo, D., ‘Shixing sifa duli yu ezhi sifa
fubai’ [‘Implementing judicial independence and preventing judicial
corruption’], Falü Kexue [Law Science] 1999, 1 (1999): 5–15.
Haley, J., ‘The myth of the reluctant litigant’,
Journal of Japanese Studies 4, 2 (1978): 359–90.
Hammett, C., ‘Attorneys’ fees in shareholder derivative suits: the
substantial benefit rule reexamined’, California Law
Review 60, 1 (1972): 164–79.
Hannigan, B., Company Law, 2nd edn., Oxford University
Press (2009).
Hay, J., and Shleifer, A., ‘Private enforcement of public laws: a theory of legal
reform’, American Economic Review 88, 2 (1998): 398–403.
Hirt, H., The Enforcement of Directors’ Duties in Britain and
Germany, Oxford: Peter
Lang (2004).
Hong, X., and Goo, S., ‘Derivative actions in China: problems and
prospects’, Journal of Business Law
2009, 4 (2009):
376–95.
Hong Kong Consumer Council, ‘Consultation paper on statutory derivative action in the Companies
(Amendment) Bill 2003’, Hong Kong Consumer Council, Hong Kong
(2004).
Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Roe, M., Wymeersch, E., and Prigge, S. (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and
Emerging Research, Oxford:
Clarendon Press (1998).
Howson, N., ‘The doctrine that dared not speak its name: Anglo-American
fiduciary duties in China’s 2005 Company Law and case law intimations of prior
convergence’ [translation of Beijing no. 1 Intermediate People’s Court (no. 4
Civil Division) (ed.), Gongsifa shenpan shiwu dianxing anli pingxi
[Company Law Hearing Guide: Critique and Analysis of Representative Cases],
Beijing: Zhongguo jianchayuan chubanshe [China
Procuratorate Press] (2005):
359–70], in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.),
Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia, London:
Routledge (2008): 193–254.
Howson, N., ‘China’s restructured commercial banks: the old
nomenklatura system serving new corporate governance structures?’, in
Avery, M., Cai, J., and Zhu, M. (eds.), China’s Emerging Financial Markets: Challenges and Global
Impact, Singapore: John Wiley
& Sons (Asia) (2009):
123–63.
Howson, N., ‘Corporate law in the Shanghai People’s Courts,
1992–2008: judicial autonomy in the contemporary authoritarian
state’, East Asia Law Review 5, 2 (2010): 303–440.
Huat, C., ‘Culturalisation of economy and politics in
Singapore’, in Robison, R. (ed.), Pathways to Asia: The Politics of Engagement,
St Leonard’s: Allen & Unwin
(1996): 87–107.
Huat, C., ‘“Asian-values” discourse and the resurrection
of the social’, Positions: East Asia Cultures
Critique 7, 2 (1999): 573–92.
Hüfer, U., Aktiengesetz [Stock Corporation Act], 8th edn.,
Munich: C. H. Beck
(2008).
IMF, ‘World economic outlook database, April 2011: nominal GDP list of countries
– data for the year 2011’, IMF, Washington, DC (
2011) [available at
www.imf.org/external/index.htm].
Jackson, H., and Roe, M., ‘Public enforcement of securities laws: preliminary
evidence’, Journal of Financial
Economics 93, 2 (2009): 207–38.
Jiancha ribao [Procuratorial Daily], ‘
Dou shi danbao re de huo;
dongshizhang bei gudong gaodao’ [‘A disaster all caused by a
guarantee; chairman of the board brought down by shareholder suit’],
Jiancha ribao,
27 July (
2001)
(available at
http://chinalawlib.com/358543998.html].
Jin, J., ‘Gudong paisheng susong zhidu
yanjiu’ [‘A study of the shareholders’ derivative lawsuit
system’], in Wang, B., Zhu, C., Shi, T., and Tang, X. (eds.), Shijianzhong de gongsifa [Company Law in Practice],
Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian
chubanshe [Social Sciences Academic Press] (2008):
412–28.
Jolls, C., ‘Behavioral economics analysis of redistributive legal
rules’, Vanderbilt Law Review 51, 6 (1998): 1653–77.
Jolly, J., ‘Das Recht der Actiengesellschaften’ [‘The law
of stock corporations’], Zeitschrift für
deutsches Recht und deutsche Rechtswissenschaft 11 (1847): 317–449.
Jones, T., ‘An empirical examination of the incidence of shareholder
derivative and class action lawsuits, 1971–1978’,
Boston University Law Review 60, 2 (1980): 306–30.
Jones, T., ‘An empirical examination of the resolution of shareholder
derivative and class action lawsuits’, Boston University
Law Review 60, 3 (1980): 542–73.
Kalss, S. (ed.), Vorstandshaftung in 15 europäischen Ländern
[Director Liability in 15 European Countries],
Vienna: Linde
(2005).
Kalss, S., ‘Shareholder suits: common problems, different solutions and
first steps towards a possible harmonisation by means of a European model
code’, European Company and Financial Law
Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 324–47.
Kalss, S., and Eckert, G., ‘Generalbericht’ [‘General
report’], in Kalss, S. (ed.), Vorstandshaftung in 15 europäischen Ländern
[Director Liability in 15 European Countries],
Vienna: Linde
(2005): 25–94.
Kanda, H., ‘What shapes corporate law in Japan?’,
in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 60–7.
Kaplan, W., and Elwood, B., ‘The derivative action: a shareholder’s “bleak
house”?’, University of British Columbia Law
Review 36, 3 (2003): 443–83.
Kaplow, L., and Shavell, S., ‘Optimal law enforcement with self-reporting of
behavior’, Journal of Political Economy 102, 3 (1994): 583–606.
Katz, A., ‘Measuring the demand for litigation: is the English rule
really cheaper?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and
Organization 3, 2 (1987): 143–76.
Kawashima, S., and Sakurai, S., ‘Shareholder derivative litigation in Japan: law, practice,
and suggested reforms’, Stanford Journal of
International Law 33, 1 (1997): 9–60.
Kawashima, T., ‘Dispute resolution in contemporary
Japan’, in von Mehren, A. (ed.), Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press (1963): 41–72.
Ke, F.-C., The Company Law, 5th edn., 2 vols.,
Taipei: Sanmin Publishers
(2003).
Keller, P., ‘Sources of order in Chinese law’,
American Journal of Comparative Law 42, 4 (1994): 711–59.
Khanna, V., ‘Enforcement of corporate governance in India: steps
forward?’, draft, University of Michigan Law
School, Ann Arbor
(2010).
Khanna, V., ‘Law enforcement and stock market development: evidence from
India’, draft, University of Michigan Law
School, Ann Arbor
(2010).
Khanna, V., ‘Judicial reform in India’, draft,
University of Michigan Law School, Ann
Arbor (2010).
Kim, E., ‘The impact of family ownership and capital structures on productivity
performance of Korean manufacturing firms: corporate governance and the “chaebol
problem”’, Working Paper no. 05–02, Hill Governance Center, Yonsei
University, Seoul (2005).
Kim, J., ‘Recent amendments to the Korean Commercial Code and their
effects on international competition’, University of
Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 21, 2 (2000): 273–330.
Kim, J., ‘Survey on derivative actions and analysis on court
decisions’ [in Korean], Corporate Governance
Review 34 (2007): 8–14.
Kim, K.-S., ‘Activation of shareholders’ derivative suits’
[in Korean], Seoul Law Journal 37, 2 (1996): 164–94.
Kim, K.-S., ‘The role of judges in corporate governance: the Korean
experience’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 116–38.
Kim, K.-S., ‘Corporate legal personality and corporate loss in Korean
law’, in Grundmann, S., Haar, B., Merkt, H., Mülbert, P., and Wellenhofer, M. (eds.), Festschrift für Klaus J. Hopt zum 70. Geburtstag am 24.
August 2010: Unternehmen, Markt und Verantwortung [Festschrift for Klaus J. Hopt on his 70th
Birthday on 24th August 2010: Firms, Markets and Responsibility],
Berlin: De Gruyter
(2010): 3115–34.
Kim, K.-S., and Kim, J., ‘Revamping fiduciary duties in Korea: does law matter in
corporate governance?’, in Milhaupt, C. (ed.), Global Markets, Domestic Institutions: Corporate Law and
Governance in a New Era of Cross-Border Deals, New
York: Columbia University Press
(2003): 372–99.
Klein, W., and Coffee, J., Business Organization and Finance, 10th edn.,
New York: Foundation Press
(2007).
Kliesow, O., Aktionärsrechte und Aktionärsklage in Japan [Shareholder
Rights and Derivative Action in Japan],
Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
(2001).
Kobayashi, H., and Hara, T., Kabunushi Daihyou Soshou: Zen Hanrei To Riron Wo Shiru [Shareholder
Derivative Action: Know All Cases and Theories],
Tokyo: Nippon Hyouron-sha
(1996).
Kobayashi, H., and Kondō, M., Atarashii kabunushi daihyō soshō [The New
Shareholders’ Derivative Action], Tokyo:
Kōbundō (2003).
Koh, P., ‘For better or worse: the statutory derivative action in
Singapore’, Singapore Academy of Law
Journal 7, 1 (1995): 74–102.
Koh, P., Company Law, 2nd edn.,
Singapore: LexisNexis
(2009).
Korobkin, R., and Ulen, T., ‘Law and behavioral science: removing the rationality
assumption from law and economics’, California Law
Review 88, 4 (2000): 1051–144.
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., and Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional
Approach, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press
(2009).
Kraakman, R., Park, H., and Shavell, S., ‘When are shareholder suits in shareholder
interests?’, Georgetown Law Journal 82, 5 (1994): 1733–75.
Krishnan, J., ‘Globetrotting law firms’,
Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 23, 1 (2010): 57–102.
Kritzer, H., Risk, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee Legal Practice in the
United States, Stanford University Press
(2004).
La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., ‘Corporate ownership around the world’,
Journal of Finance 54, 2 (1999): 471–517.
La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., ‘What works in securities laws?’,
Journal of Finance 61, 1 (2006): 1–32.
La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R., ‘Law and finance’,
Journal of Political Economy 106, 6 (1998): 1113–55.
Landes, W., and Posner, R., ‘The private enforcement of law’,
Journal of Legal Studies 4, 1 (1975): 1–46.
Latella, D., L’azione sociale di responsabilità esercitata dalla
minoranza [Derivative Action and Minority Protection],
Turin: Giappichelli
(2007).
Law Commission, ‘Shareholder remedies’, Consultation Paper no. 142, Law Commission,
London (1996).
Law Commission, ‘Shareholder remedies’, Report no. 246, Law Commission, London
(1997).
Lawson, S., ‘Cultural relativism and democracy: political myths about
“Asia” and the “West”’, in Robison, R. (ed.), Pathways to Asia: The Politics of Engagement,
St Leonard’s: Allen &
Unwin (1996): 108–28.
Lee, G., ‘Singapore Chinese society in transition: reflections on the
cultural implications of modern education’, in Charney, M., Yeoh, B., and Tong, C. K. (eds.), Chinese Migrants Abroad: Cultural, Educational and Social
Dimensions of the Chinese Diaspora, Singapore University
Press (2003): 229–52.
Lee, J., ‘Companies Act primed for a major
facelift’, Straits Times,
25 May (2011).
Li, S., ‘
Da gudong qianyi zhankuan qiaoxiang jingzhong,
tunshi ju’e lirun ling ren you’ [‘Big shareholders
misappropriate 100 billion, sounding the tocsin; gobble up huge profits, making people
concerned’],
Shanghai Zhengquan Bao [
Shanghai Securities News], 2 April (
2004) [available at
http://finance.sina.com.cn/t/20040402/0615698518.shtml].
Li, X., A Comparative Study of Shareholders’ Derivative Actions: England,
the United States, Germany and China, Deventer:
Kluwer (2007).
Licht, A., Goldschmidt, C., and Schwartz, S., ‘Culture, law, and corporate
governance’, International Review of Law and
Economics 25, 2 (2005): 229–55.
Liu, L., Gufen youxian gongsi gudongquan de baohu [Protection of
Shareholders’ Rights in Companies Limited by Shares], rev. edn.,
Beijing: Falü chubanshe [Law
Press] (2004).
Liu, L. S., ‘The politics of corporate governance in
Taiwan’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 255–77.
Liu, L.-Y., ‘The derivative action’,
Taiwan Law Journal 64, 1 (2004): 156–61.
Liu, Z., ‘Zhongguo sifa difang baohu zhuyi zhi
pipan – jianlun “sifaquan guojiahua” de sifa gaige
silu’ [‘Critique of judicial local protectionism in China:
reflections on “nationalization of judicial power” as the guideline for judicial
reform’], Faxue Yanjiu [Legal Studies]
2003, 1 (2003):
83–98.
Lu, X., ‘
Dongshizhang zi tao yaobao pei 250
wan; zhiyi wu fang zhai shijian’ [‘Chairman of the board compensates
2.5 million from his own wallet; questions about the Wu Fang Zhai
case’],
Caijing Shibao [Finance and Economic
Times],
27 July (
2001) [available at
http://finance.sina.com.cn/g20010727/88091.html].
Lu, X., ‘Mantan woguo xin “Gongfsi Fa” gudong
daibiao susong qianzhi chengxu’ [‘Discussion of the precondition
procedure for the shareholders’ representative lawsuit in China’s new
“Company Law”’], Caijingjie [Financial World] July (2007): 231–2.
Luo, P., Gongsifa de hetong jieshi [A Contractual Interpretation of Company
Law], Beijing: Beijing daxue
chubanshe [Beijing University Press] (2004).
Luo, P., ‘
Qianzhi chengxu quliu
kunjing’ [‘Difficulties over whether to eliminate or keep the
precondition procedure’],
Caijing [Finance]
2007,
19 (
2007):
28
[available at
www.p5w.net/news/xwpl/200709/t1222550.htm].
Mak, Y., and
Chng, C., ‘Corporate governance practices and disclosures in Singapore: an
update’, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore (
2000)
[available at
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/17/1931014.pdf].
Manne, H., ‘Mergers and the market for corporate
control’, Journal of Political Economy 73, 2 (1965): 110–20.
Mathew, S., ‘Hostile takeovers in India: new prospects, challenges, and
regulatory opportunities’, Columbia Business Law Review
2007, 3 (2007):
800–43.
McAlinn, G., Japanese Business Law, The
Hague: Kluwer (2007).
McCahery, J., and Vermeulen, E., ‘Role of corporate governance reform and enforcement in the
Netherlands’, in Tison, M., de Wulf, H., van der Elst, C., and Steennot, R. (eds.), Perspectives in Company Law and Financial Regulation: Essays in
Honour of Eddy Wymeersch, Cambridge University
Press (2000): 322–42.
McConvill, J., and Smith, D., ‘Can minority shareholders “free ride” on
ASIC’s civil penalty litigation?’, Company and
Securities Law Journal 20, 5 (2002): 302–6.
McGregor, R., The Party: The Secret World of China’s Communist
Rulers, New York:
HarperCollins (2010).
Merkt, H., and Göthel, S., US-amerikanisches Gesellschaftsrecht [US Company Law],
Frankfurt: Verlag Recht und
Wirtschaft (2006).
Milhaupt, C., ‘Creative norm destruction: the evolution of nonlegal rules in
Japanese corporate governance’, University of
Pennsylvania Law Review 149, 6 (2001): 2083–129.
Milhaupt, C., ‘Nonprofit organizations as investor protection: economic
theory and evidence from east Asia’, Yale Journal of
International Law 29, 1 (2004): 169–207.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Annual Report 2010–2011, New
Delhi: Government of India
(2011).
National Bureau of Statistics, Zhongguo gongye jingji tongji nianjian 2007 [Statistical Yearbook of
China’s Industrial Economy 2007], Beijing:
Zhongguo tongji chubanshe [China Statistics Press]
(2007).
Nihon Keizai Shimbun (ed.), Kabunushi no Hanran [Shareholder Rebellion],
Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun
(1993).
Noda, Y., An Introduction to Japanese Law, trans. Angelo, A., University of Tokyo Press
(1976).
Oda, H., Japanese Law, 3rd edn., Oxford University
Press (2009).
Osunbor, O., ‘A critical appraisal of “the interests of
justice” as an exception to the rule in Foss v.
Harbottle’,
International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37, 1 (1987): 1–13.
Pagnucco, J.-C., L’action sociale jut singuli et ut universi en droit des
groupements [The Derivative Action and the Regulation of Groups of Companies],
Paris: L.G.D.J.
(2006).
Pascutto, E., and Jordan, C., Review of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance: Consultancy
Report, Ottawa: Government
Printer (1997).
Paul, C., ‘Derivative actions under English and German corporate law:
shareholder participation between the tension filled areas of corporate
governance and malicious shareholder interference’,
European Company and Financial Law Review 7, 1 (2010): 82–115.
Payne, J., ‘“Clean hands” in derivative
actions’, Cambridge Law Journal 61, 1 (2002): 76–86.
Pekmezovic, A., ‘Determinants of corporate ownership: the question of legal
origin (part 1)’, International Company and Commercial
Law Review 18, 3 (2007): 97–106.
Pekmezovic, A., ‘Determinants of corporate ownership: the question of legal
origin (part 2)’, International Company and Commercial
Law Review 18, 4 (2007): 147–53.
Peng, H., ‘
Konggu gudong sunhai gongsi ji gudong liyi de
falü jiuji yu sikao: cong yi gudong daibiao susong kan gongsi ji xiao gudong de
falü baohu [‘Legal analysis and remedies regarding controlling
shareholder injury to the company and minority shareholders: looking at legal protections for
company and minority shareholder rights from a shareholder representative suit’], China
Court, 9 March (
2009),
www.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=347591.
Pennington, P., Company Law, 8th edn.,
London: Butterworths
(2001).
Pettet, B., Lowry, J., and Reisberg, A., Pettet’s Company Law: Company and Capital Markets
Law, 3rd edn., Harlow:
Longman (2009).
Phang, A., B. L., ‘Of generality and specificity: a suggested
approach toward the development of an autochthonous Singapore legal
system’, Singapore Academy of Law Journal 1, 1 (1989): 68–80.
Phang, A., B. L., The Development of Singapore Law: Historical and
Socio-Legal Perspectives, London:
Butterworths (1990).
Phang, A., B. L., ‘Cementing the foundations: the Singapore
application of the English Law Act 1993’, University of
British Columbia Law Review 28, 1 (1994): 205–45.
Pistor, K., Keinan, Y., Kleinheisterkamp, J., and West, M., ‘The evolution of corporate law: a cross-country
comparison’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of
International Economic Law 23, 4 (2002): 791–871.
Planck, M., Aktionärsklagen im französischen und deutschen Recht unter
Einbeziehung der neueren Rechtsentwicklung in Belgien [Derivative Actions in French and German
Law including Recent Developments in Belgian Law],
Frankfurt: Peter Lang
(1995).
Polinsky, M., ‘Private versus public enforcement of
fines’, Journal of Legal Studies 9, 1 (1980): 105–27.
Polinsky, M., and Rubinfeld, D., ‘Does the English rule discourage
low-probability-of-prevailing plaintiffs?’, Journal of
Legal Studies 27, 2 (1998): 519–35.
Polinsky, M., and Shavell, S., ‘The economic theory of public enforcement of
law’, Journal of Economic Literature 38, 1 (2000): 45–76.
Prentice, D., ‘Shareholder actions: the rule in Foss v. Harbottle’,
Law Quarterly Review 104, 3 (1988): 341–6.
Prowse, S., ‘The structure of corporate ownership in
Japan’, Journal of Finance 47, 3 (1992): 1121–40.
Prunty, B., ‘The shareholders’ derivative suit: notes on its
deviation’, New York University Law
Review 32, 5 (1957): 980–94.
Puchniak, D., ‘The Japanization of American corporate governance? Evidence
of the never-ending history for corporate law’,
Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 9, 1 (2007): 8–71.
Qi, P., ‘Guojia jing mao wei fuzhuren Jiang
Qiangui: zuo shangshi gongsi chengxin fuze de konggu gudong’ [‘SETC
vice chairman Jiang Qiangui: be a sincere and responsible listed company controlling
shareholder’], Jingji Ribao [Economic
Daily], 29 January (2003).
Quah, J., ‘Government policies and
nation-building’, in Quah, J. (ed.), In Search of Singapore’s National Values,
Singapore: Times Academic
Press (1990): 45–65.
Ramsay, I., ‘Corporate governance, shareholder litigation and the
prospects for a statutory derivative action’, University
of New South Wales Law Review 15, 1 (1992): 149–76.
Ramsay, I., and Saunders, B., ‘Litigation by shareholders and directors: an empirical study
of the statutory derivative action’, Journal of
Corporate Law Studies 6, 2 (2006): 397–446.
Ramseyer, M., ‘The costs of the consensual myth: antitrust enforcement and
institutional barriers to litigation in Japan’, Yale Law
Journal 94, 3 (1985): 604–45.
Ramseyer, M., ‘Takeovers in Japan: opportunism, ideology and corporate
control’, UCLA Law Review 35, 1 (1987): 1–64.
Ramseyer, M., ‘Reluctant litigant revisited: rationality and disputes in
Japan’, Journal of Japanese Studies 14, 1 (1988): 111–23.
Ramseyer, M., and Nakazato, M., Japanese Law: An Economic Approach,
University of Chicago Press (1989).
Ramseyer, M., and Nakazato, M., ‘The rational litigant: settlement amounts and verdict rates
in Japan’, Journal of Legal Studies 18, 2 (1989): 263–90.
Reisberg, A., Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance,
Oxford University Press (2007).
Reisberg, A., ‘Shadows of the past and back to the future: part 11 of the UK
Companies Act 2006 (in)action’, European Company and
Financial Law Review 6, 2/3 (2009): 219–43.
Reserve Bank of India, Report of the Committee on Financial Sector
Assessment, vol. IV, Advisory Panel on Financial
Regulation and Supervision: India’s Financial Sector: An
Assessment, New Delhi:
Government of India (2009).
Rollin, F., Die Aktionärsklage in England und Deutschland [Derivative Actions
in the United Kingdom and Germany], Baden-Baden:
Nomos (2001).
Romano, R., ‘The shareholder suit: litigation without
foundation?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and
Organization 7, 1 (1991): 55–87.
Rotterdam School of Management, India, Culture and Management: The Art of Doing Business,
Rotterdam: Eburon
(1989).
Salwin, L., ‘The new Commercial Code of Japan: symbol of gradual progress
toward democratic goals’, Georgetown Law
Journal 50, 3 (1962): 478–512.
SCCLR, Report on the Recommendations of a Consultancy Report of the Review of
the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance, Hong Kong:
SCCLR (2000).
SCCLR, ‘Consultation paper for the Corporate Governance Review, phase
1’, SCCLR, Hong
Kong (2001).
Schmolke, U., ‘Die Aktionärsklage nach § 148 AktG:
Anreizwirkungen de lege lata und Reformanregungen de lege ferenda’ [‘The derivative action according to
§ 148 (German) Stock Corporation Act: incentives de lege
lata and suggestions for reform de lege
ferenda’], Zeitschrift für
Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 40, 4 (2011): 398–442.
Schmolke, U., ‘Beschlussmängelrecht und Gesellschafterklage in der US amerikanische
corporation’ [‘Regulation of void/voidable acts and shareholder suits regarding
the US corporation’], in Fleischer, H. (ed.), Beschlussmängelrecht in Kapitalgesellschaften [Regulation of Faulty Resolutions Passed by the Shareholders’ Meeting]
(forthcoming).
Sealy, L., ‘Foss v. Harbottle: a marathon where nobody wins’,
Cambridge Law Journal 40, 1 (1981): 29–33.
Sealy, L., ‘Problems of standing, pleading and proof in corporate
litigation’, in Pettet, B. (ed.), Company Law in Change: Current Legal Problems,
London: Stevens
(1987): 1–21.
Sealy, L., ‘No relief for the minority
shareholder’, The Company Lawyer 16, 6 (1995): 178–80.
Shanghai Stock Exchange Research Center (ed.), Zhonguo gongsi zhili baogao (2003 nian) [China Corporate
Governance Report (2003)], Shanghai:
Fudan daxue chubanshe [Fudan University Press]
(2003).
Shanghai zhengquan bao [Shanghai Securities News], ‘
Shouli gudong daibiao susong wei bei
shouli’ [‘First shareholder representative suit is not
accepted’],
Shanghai zhengquan bao, 22 April
(
2003) [available at
http://101.stock888.net/030422/100,101,78015,00.shtml].
Shiller, R., Irrational Exuberance, New
York: Broadway Books
(2000).
Siems, M., ‘Welche Auswirkungen hat das neue Verfolgungsrecht der
Aktionärsminderheit?’ [‘What are the consequences of the new right for
bringing actions granted to minority shareholders?’],
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 104, 3 (2005): 376–94.
Siems, M., Convergence in Shareholder Law, Cambridge
University Press (2008).
Siems, M., ‘Private enforcement of directors’ duties: derivative actions as a
global phenomenon’, Working Paper no. 2010-MS-1, University of East Anglia Law School,
Norwich (
2010) [available at
www.uea.ac.uk/law/Research/Papers].
Simon, H., Models of Man: Social and Rational, New
York: John Wiley
(1957).
Sockol, A., ‘A natural evolution: compulsory arbitration of shareholder
derivative suits in publicly traded corporations’,
Tulane Law Review 77, 4 (2003): 1095–117.
Song, O.-R., ‘Improving corporate governance through litigation: derivative
suits and class actions in Korea’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 91–115.
Spamann, H., ‘The “antidirector rights index”
revisited’, Review of Financial Studies 23, 2 (2010): 467–86.
Statistics Bureau,
Shiho-tokei-nenpo 1 minji-gyosei-hen heisei 20 nendo [Judicial
Statistics Yearbook, vol. I,
Civil and Administrative
Cases],
Tokyo:
Statistics
Bureau (
2008) [available at
www.courts.go.jp; last accessed 31 May
2010].
Sundaresan, S., ‘SEBI has greater powers than US SEC’,
Business Standard, 26 October
(2009).
Tan, C. H. (ed.), Walter Woon on Company Law, rev. 3rd edn.,
Singapore: Sweet & Maxwell
Asia (2009).
Tan, K., ‘A short legal and constitutional history of
Singapore’, in Tan, K. (ed.), The Singapore Legal System, 2nd edn.,
Singapore University Press (1999):
26–66.
Tanase, T., ‘The management of disputes: automobile accident compensation
in Japan’, Law and Society Review 24, 3 (1990): 651–91.
Tang, X., ‘Protecting minority shareholders in China: a task for both
legislation and enforcement’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 141–67.
Thai, L., ‘How popular are statutory derivative actions in Australia?
Comparisons with United States, Canada and New Zealand’,
Australian Business Law Review 30, 1 (2002): 118–37.
Thomas, R., ‘The evolving role of institutional investors in corporate
governance and corporate litigation’, Vanderbilt Law
Review 61, 2 (2008): 299–314.
Thompson, R., and Thomas, R., ‘The public and private faces of derivative
lawsuits’, Vanderbilt Law Review 57, 5 (2004): 1747–93.
Tjio, H., and Wee, M. S., ‘Foss v. Harbottle in the Singapore Court of Appeal’,
Company and Securities Law Journal 26, 5 (2008): 333–43.
Tseng, W. R., ‘The reform of the UK Companies Act 2006 and the derivative
action’, in A New Era of the Financial and Economic Legal
Regime: In Honor of Prof. Yuan-Ho Lai’s Seventieth Birthday,
Taipei: Angle Publishers
(2008): 295–318.
Tu, J., ‘
Lüshifei you baisufang chengdan, you li yu
minzhong xuanze falü shouduan baohu hefa quanyi’ [‘For the
loser to pay attorneys’ fees is advantageous to the people’s choosing legal
methods to protect their lawful rights and interests’], 5 January (
2009),
www.lawyn.com [available at
http://tinyurl.com/r5mxdt].
Turnbull, C., A History of Modern Singapore, 1819–2005,
Singapore University Press (2010).
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., ‘Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and
probability’, in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,
Cambridge University Press (1982):
163–78.
United Nations, Trends in International Migrant Stock: The 2008 Revision
(CD-ROM documentation: POP/DB/MIG/Stock/Rev 2008), New York:
United Nations (2009).
Utsumi, K., ‘The business judgment rule and shareholder derivative suits
in Japan: a comparison with those in the United States’,
New York International Law Review 14, 1 (2001): 129–65.
Van Aaken, A., ‘Shareholder suits as a technique of internationalization and
control of management’, Rabels Zeitschrift für
ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 68, 2 (2004): 288–327.
Velayutham, S., Responding to Globalization: Nation, Culture and Identity in
Singapore, Singapore: Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies (2007).
Vermeulen, E., and Zetzsche, D., ‘The use and abuse of investor suits: an inquiry into the dark
side of shareholder activism’, European Company and
Financial Law Review 7, 1 (2010): 1–62.
Von Nessen, P., Goo, S. H., and Low, C., ‘The statutory derivative action: now showing near
you’, Journal of Business Law 7 (2007): 627–61.
Wang, W. Y., and Chen, J.-L., ‘Reforming China’s securities class actions: lessons
from USA PSLRA reform and Taiwan’s government-sanctioned
non-profit’, Columbia Journal of Asia Law 21, 2 (2008): 115–60.
Wang, W. Y., and Pang, Y.-C., ‘An analytical framework for controlling minority shareholders
and its application to Taiwan’, in Kanda, H., Kim, K.-S., and Milhaupt, C. (eds.), Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia,
London: Routledge
(2008): 278–97.
Wedderburn, K., ‘Shareholders’ rights and the rule in Foss v. Harbottle’, Cambridge Law
Journal 15, 2 (1957): 194–215.
Wedderburn, K., ‘Shareholders’ rights and the rule in Foss v. Harbottle
(continued)’, Cambridge Law Journal 16, 1 (1958): 93–106.
Weinstein, N., ‘Unrealistic optimism about future life
events’, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 39, 5 (1980): 806–20.
Weiss, E., and White, L., ‘File early, then free ride: how Delaware law (mis)shapes
shareholder class actions’, Vanderbilt Law
Review 57, 5 (2004): 1797–881.
Wesley-Smith, P., An Introduction to the Hong Kong Legal System, 3rd edn.,
Beijing: Oxford University
Press (1999).
West, M., ‘The pricing of shareholder derivative actions in Japan and
the United States’, Northwestern University Law
Review 88, 4 (1994): 1436–507.
West, M., ‘Information, institutions, and extortion in Japan and the
United States: making sense of Sokaiya racketeers’,
Northwestern Law Review 93, 3 (1999): 767–817.
West, M., ‘Why shareholders sue: the evidence from
Japan’, Journal of Legal Studies 30, 2 (2001): 351–82.
Winnen, A., Die Innenhaftung des Vorstandes nach dem UMAG [Director’s
Liability with respect to the Company under the UMAG],
Baden-Baden: Nomos
(2009).
Wood, F.,
Survey and Report regarding Stockholders’ Derivative
Suits,
New York:
New York Chamber
of Commerce (
1944) [available at
http://openlibrary.org].
Woon, W., ‘The continuing reception of English commercial
law’, in Woon, W. (ed.), The Singapore Legal System,
Singapore: Longman
(1989): 121–41.
Woon, W., Company Law, 2nd edn.,
Singapore: Longman
(1997).
Woon, W., and Hicks, A., The Companies Act of Singapore: An Annotation,
Singapore: Lexis Law
Publishing (1990).
Wu, X., ‘
Neimu jiaoyi, caozong shichang minshi peichang
anjian hu zhi yu chu’ [‘Civil compensation cases for insider trading
and market manipulation about to appear’], National People’s Congress, 18
November (
2007) [available at
http://npc.people.com.cn/GB/6543957.html].
Wu, Y., ‘Sifa duli yu difang baohu
zhuyi’ [‘Judicial independence and local
protectionism’], Hunan Gongan Gaodeng Zhuanke Xuexiao
Xuebao [Journal of the Hunan Higher and Specialized Institutes of Public
Security], 16, 2 (2004):
18–22.
Xie, Z., and Chen, M., ‘Gudong paisheng susong zai
sikao’ [‘Rethinking shareholder derivative
suits’], Fujian zhengfa guanli ganbu xueyuan xuebao
[Journal of the Fujian Political-Legal Administrative Cadre Institute] 2001,
4 (2001): 24–7.
Yeo, V., Lee, J., Hanrahan, P., and Ramsay, I., Commercial Applications of Company Law in Singapore, 4th
edn., Singapore: CCH Asia
(2011).
Yoon, Y.-S., ‘Attorney’s fees in the shareholder’s derivative
suit’ [in Korean], Commercial Law Review 20, 1 (2001): 195–232.
Zhang, R., and
Wang, L., ‘
Ben an gudong shifou you quan chongdang yuangao
daibiao gongsi tiqi susong’ [‘Does the shareholder in this case have
the right to take the role of plaintiff and bring suit on behalf of the company?’],
Renmin fayuan wang [People’s Court Net], 31 May
(
2004),
www.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=117915.
Zhang, Y., ‘
Da gudong zhanyong shangshi gongsi
zijin xu biaoben jianzhi’ [‘Both the root cause and symptoms of
misappropriation of listed company assets by big shareholders must be
cured’],
Zhengquan shibao [Securities
Times],
7 December (
2004) [available at
http://business.sohu.com/20041207/n223371872.shtml].
Zhang, Z., ‘Making shareholder derivative actions happen in China: how
should lawsuits be funded?’, Hong Kong Law
Journal 38, 2 (2008): 523–62.
Zhao, J., and Wu, G. (eds.), Ban an quancheng shilu – gudong daibiao susong [True
Records of Complete Course of Case Handling: The Shareholders’ Representative
Lawsuit], Beijing: Falü
chubanshe [Law Press] (2007).
Zhao, J., and Wu, G., Zhongguo lüshi ban’an quancheng shilu: gudong daibiao
susong [Complete Record of Case Handling for Chinese Lawyers: Shareholder Representative
Suits], Beijing: Falü
chubanshe [Law Press] (2007).
