Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:58:13.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Democracy’s opponents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

John Keane
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

The closed-system consociations among politicians, journalists, public relations specialists and lobbyists, the hidden power zones that this book has called mediacracy, sometimes assume scandalous proportions. The development of a bizarre ‘toxic shadow state’ anchored in webs of exchanges among News International executives and journalists, police, snooping private detectives, celebrities, innocent citizens and politicians within the Westminster parliament is an example of what can happen in practice when the trend is left unchecked by toothy public scrutiny mechanisms. Other examples include the tendency of governing parties in the new democracies of central-eastern Europe to colonise state institutions with the help of ‘friends’ in the fields of journalism, business, lobbying and public relations; and the deep involvement of prominent journalists and political lobbyists in scandal-ridden efforts to broker deals between politicians and business leaders during the allocation of valuable parts of the second-generation (2G) mobile phone spectrum in India. These episodes in the drift towards mediacracy bode ill for monitory democracy; for many observers, they reinforce its decadent ‘feel’. Their sense of decay amid profusion is amplified by other trends. Communicative abundance (as we have seen) is deeply implicated in such phenomena as flat earth news and no earth news. It is bound up with cyberattacks; moves to restrict freedom of information through digital gatekeeping; and the proliferation of manipulative consumer marketing algorithms. Communicative abundance is linked to mushrooming media oligopolies and to claims (arguably exaggerated) that the growth of media-saturated societies damages everyday life, for instance, by amplifying the loneliness of citizens.

Looking back, looking forward

The various trends are, for the moment, not convergent, but their seriousness reminds us that monitory democracy has no historical guarantees – and that, in principle, this new historical form of handling power can suffer loss of traction and atrophy, perhaps even be snuffed out, as easily as a candle by puffs of wind.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Thakurta, Paranjoy Guha and Reddy, Kalimekolan Sreenivas, Paid News: How Corruption in the Indian Media is Undermining Democracy (Delhi, 2011)Google Scholar
Marche, Stephen, ‘Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?’, The Atlantic Magazine, May 2012
Gowing, Nik, ‘Skyful of Lies’ and Black Swans: The New Tyranny of Shifting Information Power in Crises (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar
Flinders, Matthew V., ‘The Demonisation of Politicians: Moral Panics, Folk Devils and MPs Expenses’, Contemporary Politics 18 (March 2012): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L., New York Times, 15 November 2011
Vibert, Frank, The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers (Cambridge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew V., Defending Politics (Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nossel, Suzanne, ‘Smart Power’, Foreign Policy (March/April 2004), available at:
Carpenter, Ted Galen, Smart Power: Toward a Prudent Foreign Policy for America (Washington, DC, 2008)Google Scholar
State Council Information Office, Building Political Democracy in China (Beijing, 19 October 2005)Google Scholar
Keping, Yu, Democracy is a Good Thing: Essays on Politics, Society, and Culture in Contemporary China (Washington, DC, 2009), p. 3Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, Ancient Chinese Philosophy, Modern Chinese Power (Princeton, 2010)Google Scholar
Li, Eric X., ‘The Life of the Party: The Post-Democratic Future Begins in China’, Foreign Affairs 92(1) (January/February 2013): 34–46Google Scholar
Berggruen, Nicholas and Gardels, Nathan, Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way Between West and East (Cambridge, 2012)Google Scholar
Padover, Saul K. (ed.), The Forging of American Federalism: Selected Writings of James Madison (New York, 1953), p. 337
Stockmann, Daniela, Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China (Cambridge and New York, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandurski, David and Hala, Martin, Investigative Journalism in China (Hong Kong, 2010)Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory, Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology (London, 1972), p. 381Google Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth and Jisi, Wang, Addressing US–China Strategic Distrust, 4 (Washington, DC, March 2012)Google Scholar
Duzhe, Mei, ‘How China’s Government is Attempting to Control Chinese Media in America’, China Brief 1(10) (November 2001)Google Scholar
Fang, Irving, A History of Mass Communication: Six Information Revolutions (Boston and Oxford, 1997), p. 30Google Scholar
Li-Fung, Cho, ‘The Emergence, Influence and Limitations of Watchdog Journalism in Post-1992 China: A Case Study of Southern Weekend’, PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong, 2007
Dikötter, Frank, Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–62 (London, 2010)Google Scholar
Zhang, Guo-qing et al., ‘Evolution of the Internet and its Cores’, New Journal of Physics (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing), 10 (2008): 1–11Google Scholar
Gomez, James et al. (eds), Asian Cyberactivism: Freedom of Expression and Media Censorship (Hong Kong, 2008)
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey, ‘NIMBY comes to China’, The Nation, 4 February 2008
Cai, Yongshun, Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail (Stanford, 2010)Google Scholar
Weiwei, Ai in ‘Spiegel-Gespräch: Ich sollte mich schämen’, Der Spiegel, 21 November 2011
Yiyi, Lu, ‘Chinese Protest in the Age of the Internet’, Wall Street Journal, 14 December 2010
Yeo, George and Li, Eric X., ‘China’s Parallel Universe’, New Perspectives Quarterly 29(2) (Spring 2012), available at: Google Scholar
New York Times, 14 February 2012
‘Public Opinion via Internet’, China Daily (Hong Kong), 16 December 2010, p. 8
Chin, Josh, ‘Censorship 3.0? Sina Weibo’s New ‘User Credit’ Points System’, Wall Street Journal, 29 May 2012, available at:
Hille, Kathrin, ‘How China Polices the internet’, Financial Times, 18 July 2009

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Democracy’s opponents
  • John Keane, University of Sydney
  • Book: Democracy and Media Decadence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300767.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Democracy’s opponents
  • John Keane, University of Sydney
  • Book: Democracy and Media Decadence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300767.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Democracy’s opponents
  • John Keane, University of Sydney
  • Book: Democracy and Media Decadence
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300767.004
Available formats
×