Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:20:07.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Vision/Critique/Avowal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2015

Claire Jean Kim
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

We may disagree with some aspect of their [minority cultures’] moral, ethical, or evaluative practices without dismissing or holding in disrespect their life-worlds altogether. Most human encounters ... occur in this in-between space of partial evaluations, translations, and contestations.

– Seyla Benhabib

In the Chinatown live animal market conflict, the optics of cruelty, racism, and ecological harm highlight and challenge (or purport to challenge) different dimensions of power – human domination over animals, white domination over the Chinese, and human domination over nature, respectively. Each optic directs our focus to a specific issue in a particular way, even as it necessarily diverts our attention away from other concerns. Single-optic vision of this kind tends to lead in the course of political struggle to a posture of mutual disavowal, where each group elevates its own suffering and justice claims over the suffering and justice claims of the other group, either partly or wholly invalidating the latter as a matter of political and moral concern. Disavowal, an act of dis-association and rejection, can range from failing to recognize that one is causing harm to the other group to refusing to acknowledge that the other group suffers or has valid justice claims to actively and knowingly reproducing patterns of social injury to the other group.

The posture of mutual disavowal is unsurprising in one sense: politics as a struggle over scarce resources (material, symbolic, and other) is by its very nature oppositional – one is always mobilizing for and therefore against something, so disavowing an opponent’s claims and perspective is par for the course. The rub arises when one is mobilizing not against an oppressive majority but rather against another subordinated group (or, in the case of animal advocates, those representing a subordinated group). If we believe that justice requires the mitigation or cessation of various forms of social domination, the possible implications of disavowal here should give us pause.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dangerous Crossings
Race, Species, and Nature in a Multicultural Age
, pp. 181 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Vision/Critique/Avowal
  • Claire Jean Kim, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Dangerous Crossings
  • Online publication: 05 April 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107045392.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Vision/Critique/Avowal
  • Claire Jean Kim, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Dangerous Crossings
  • Online publication: 05 April 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107045392.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Vision/Critique/Avowal
  • Claire Jean Kim, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Dangerous Crossings
  • Online publication: 05 April 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107045392.008
Available formats
×