Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:01:46.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research and Statistics

from Part II - Teaching across the Psychology Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2018

Edited by
Kenneth D. Keith
Kenneth D. Keith
Affiliation:
University of San Diego
Get access

Summary

The role of culture in shaping our biology and physiology could be an organizing theme for a biological psychology class. One of the most important developments in our modern conception of brain function is an appreciation of the plasticity of the nervous system and its sensitivity to experience. There are compelling reasons for integration of culture in the biological psychology course, and research has illuminated numerous cases of cultural influence on evolution and selection for alleles of genes that confer an advantage to individuals in particular cultures. The author presents a variety of topics illustrating the gene-culture intersection, and suggests a number of class projects and activities to aid in teaching.
Type
Chapter
Information
Culture across the Curriculum
A Psychology Teacher's Handbook
 , pp. 113 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ambrose, S. A., & Lovett, M. C. (2014). Prior knowledge is more than content: Skills and beliefs also impact learning. In Benassi, V. A., Overson, C. E., & Hakala, C. M. (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology website, http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/asle2014/index.phpGoogle Scholar
Association for Psychological Science. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3–6. doi:10.1177/0956797613512465Google Scholar
Ball, L. C., Cribbie, R. A., & Steele, J. R. (2016). Beyond gender differences: Using tests of equivalence to evaluate gender similarities. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 2, 147–154. doi:10.1177/0361684313480483Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2015, September 1). Psychology is not in crisis. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., … & Ekehammar, B. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.Google Scholar
Cable, D. A. (2013). The racial dot map. University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://demographics.coopercenter.org/racial-dot-map/Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coulson, M., Healey, M., Fidler, F., & Cumming, G. (2010). Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing. Frontiers in Psychology: Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 1, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00026Google Scholar
Crocetti, E., Hale, W. W., Dimitrova, R., Abubakar, A., Gao, C-H., & Pesigan, I. J. A. (2015). Generalized anxiety symptoms and identity processes in cross-cultural samples of adolescents from the general population. Child Youth Care Forum, 44, 159–174. doi:10.1007/s10566-014-9275-9Google Scholar
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Diener-Biswas, R. (n.d.). The replication crisis in psychology. Noba Project. Retrieved from http://nobaproject.com/modules/the-replication-crisis-in-psychologyGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., Cook, O., & Yung, Y. (2001). Loneliness and life satisfaction among three cultural groups. Personal Relationships, 8, 225–230. doi:10.1111/j.1475–6811.2001.tb00037.xGoogle Scholar
Grimes, W. (2005, November 18). Winnowing the field of America to one representative. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
Issa, M.-A., Falkenbach, D. M., Trupp, G. F., Campregher, J. G., & Lap, J. (2017). Psychopathy in Lebanese college students: The PPI-R considered in the context of borderline features and aggressive attitudes across sex and culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 64–69. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.035Google Scholar
Kemmelmeier, M., & Malanchuk, O. (2016). Greater self-enhancement in Western than Eastern Ukraine, but failure to replicate the Muhammad Ali effect. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 78–82. doi:10.1002/ijop.12151Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1, 93–124. doi:10.1080/026999300379003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalonde, R. N., Cila, J., Lou, E., & Cribbie, R. A. (2015). Are we really that different from each other? The difficulties of focusing on similarities in cross-cultural research. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21 (4), 525–534. doi:10.1037/pac0000134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H.C. (2015). Emotional reactions to crime across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 50 (5), 327–335. doi:10.1002/ijop.12103Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Kim, J. J., Grissom, R. J., & Dinnel, D. L. (2011). Effect sizes in cross-cultural research. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.), Cross-Cultural research methods in psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Fontaine, J., Anguas-Wong, A. M., Arriola, M., Ataca, B., … & Zengeya, A. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 55–74. doi:10.1177/0022022107311854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2012). The omnicultural imperative. Culture and Psychology, 18 (3), 304–330. doi:10.1177/1354067X12446230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, K. (2005). The average American: The extraordinary search for the nation’s most ordinary citizen. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, K. (2006). An average surprise. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/opinion/12CT-OKeefe.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. E., Tong, E. M. W., Pang, J. S., & Chowdhury, A. (2016). A puzzle unsolved: Failure to observe different effects of God and religion primes on intergroup attitudes. Public Library of Science, 11 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147178Google Scholar
Tafreshi, D., Slaney, K. L., & Neufeld, S. D. (2016). Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36, 233–249. doi:10.1037/teo0000048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). [Editorial]. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1–2., doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991Google Scholar
UNdata. (2017, March 29). Retrieved from http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=GenderStat&f=inID:19Google Scholar
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2017, March 29). Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/literacy/Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2016). Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 583–596. doi:10.1177/1745691616645552Google Scholar
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose, The American Statistician. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2017, March 29). Retrieved from www.who.int/gho/countries/en/Google Scholar

References

Allwood, C. M. (1998). The creation and nature(s) of indigenized psychologies from the perspective of the anthropology of knowledge. In Gorenstein, S. (Ed.), Knowledge and society (Vol. 11, pp. 153–172). Greenwich, CT: Jai.Google Scholar
Allwood, C .M. (2011). On the foundation of the indigenous psychologies. Social Epistemology, 25, 3–14. doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.534564Google Scholar
Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1417–1429. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9455-8Google Scholar
Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 243–268. doi:10.1080/00207590544000013Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature, 12, 351–381. doi:10.1007/s12110-001-1003-0Google Scholar
Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. (2005). The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112, 744–776. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.744Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721–735. doi:10.1080/00207598908247841Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., & Triandis, H. C. (2006). Culture. In Pawlik, K. & d’Ydewalle, G. (Eds.), Psychological concepts: An international historical perspective (pp. 47–62). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, E. E. (1996). The seven flaws of cross-cultural psychology: The story of a conversion. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(1), 2–10. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0301_2Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T. L., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., & Bartram, D. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 94–105. doi:10.1037/a0014516Google Scholar
Church, A. T., & Katigbak, M. S. (2002). Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 129–148. doi:10.1080/00207590143000315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cox, M. V., & Bayraktar, R. (1989). A cross-cultural study of children’s human figure drawings. Presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crises of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(621), 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621Google Scholar
Fowler, D. D., & Hardesty, D. L. (Eds.). (1994). Others knowing others: Perspective on ethnographic careers. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 1115–1124. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Idhe, D. (1977). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 19–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00154.xGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 27–48). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-28662-4_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. In Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_1Google Scholar
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC). (1982). Culture and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 642–719). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 34, 740–754. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.9.740Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291Google Scholar
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313–338. doi:10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00020Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). A situated cognition perspective on culture: Effects of priming cultural syndromes on cognition and motivation. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 237–265). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373694-9.00011-8Google Scholar
Savani, K., Cho, J., Baik, S., & Morris, M. W. (2015). Culture and judgment and decision making. In Wu, G. & Keren, G. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 456–477). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch16Google Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433014Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shebani, M. F. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2008). Memory development in Libyan and Dutch school children. European Journal of Development Psychology, 5, 419–438. doi:10.1080/17405620701343204Google Scholar
Shostak, M. (1983). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology – What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173728.002Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446212028Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P., & McCurdy, D. W. (1980). Anthropology: The cultural perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Preface. In Triandis, H. C. & Lonner, W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 3. Basic processes (pp. viii–xix). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. doi:10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00060Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004Google Scholar
van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412984935Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410–419. doi:10.1177/1745691610375556Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

References

Behr, D., & Shishido, K. (2016). The translation of measurement instruments for cross-cultural surveys. In Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T. W., & Fu, Y. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 269–287). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721–735. doi:10.1080/00207598908246808Google Scholar
Boer, D. (2009). Music makes the people come together: Social functions of music listening for young people across cultures. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/1155/Google Scholar
Boer, D., & Fischer, R. (2012). Towards a holistic picture of functions of music: A culturally decentred qualitative approach. Psychology of Music, 40, 179–200. doi:10.1177/0305735610381885Google Scholar
Boer, D., Fischer, R., de Garay Hernández, J., González Atilo, M. L., Moreno, L., Roth, M., & Zenger, M. (2011). The functions of music-listening across cultures: The development of a scale measuring personal, social and cultural functions of music. In Deutsch, F., Boehnke, M., Kühnen, U., & Boehnke, K. (Eds.), Rendering borders obsolete: Cross-cultural and cultural psychology as an interdisciplinary, multi-method endeavor. Bremen: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.Google Scholar
Boer, D., Fischer, R., Tekman, H. G., Abubakar, A. A., Njenga, J., & Zenger, M. (2012). Young people’s topography of musical functions: Personal, social and cultural experiences with music across genders and six cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 355–369. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.656128Google Scholar
Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (in press). On handling systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593. doi:10.1037/a0022389Google Scholar
Dove, A. (1971). The “Chitling” test. In Aiken, L. R. Jr., Psychological and educational testings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Harkness, J. A. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In Harkness, J. A., van de Vijver, F., & Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Harkness, J. A., Edwards, B., Hansen, S. E., Miller, D. R., & Villar, A. (2010). Designing questionnaires for multipopulation research. In Harkness, J. A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Lyberg, L. E., Mohler, P. Ph., Pennell, B-E., & Smith, T. W. (Eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multicultural, and multiregional contexts (pp. 33–58). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies in educational psychology. In Liem, G. A. D. & Bernardo, A. B. I. (Eds.), Advancing cross-cultural perspectives on educational psychology: A festschrift for Dennis McInerney (pp. 39–56). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2008). Cultural psychology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 111–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar
Hui, C., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309. doi:10.1177/0022022189203004Google Scholar
Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 264–277. doi:10.1177/0022022104272905Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & van de Vijver, F. (Eds.). (2011). Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohler, P., Dorer, B., de Jong, J., & Hu, M. (2016). Translation: Overview. guidelines for best practice in cross-cultural surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pe-Pua, R. (2006). From decolonising psychology to the development of a cross-indigenous perspective. In Kim, U., Yang, K. S., & Hwang, K. K. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 109–137). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Redden, P. M., & Simons, J. A. (1986). Manual for the Redden Simons “Rap” Test. Ankeny, IA: Des Moines Area Community College.Google Scholar
Sakai, M., Ishikawa, S., Takizawa, M., Sato, H., & Sakano, Y. (2004). The state of hikikomori from a family’s point of view: Statistical survey and the role of psychological intervention. Japanese Journal of Counseling Science, 37, 168–179.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61. doi:10.1177/0022022103260380Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Fischer, R., Vignoles, V. L., & Bond, M. H. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding social psychology across cultures: Engaging with others in a changing world (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van de Gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W., & Gebhardt, E. (2012). The reference group effect: An explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1205–1228. doi:10.1177/0022022111428083Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013a). Construct bias. In Keith, K. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 233–235). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118339893Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013b). Method bias. In Keith, K. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 878–880). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013c). Item bias. In Keith, K. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 772–774). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29Google Scholar
Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J., Billiet, J., & Cambré, B. (2003). Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-type score items. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 702–722. doi:10.1177/0022022103257070Google Scholar
Woolf, L. M. & Hulsizer, M. R. (2011). Why diversity matters: The power of inclusion in research methods. In Keith, K. D. (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 56–72). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241–264. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00067Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Research and Statistics
  • Edited by Kenneth D. Keith, University of San Diego
  • Book: Culture across the Curriculum
  • Online publication: 30 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316996706.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Research and Statistics
  • Edited by Kenneth D. Keith, University of San Diego
  • Book: Culture across the Curriculum
  • Online publication: 30 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316996706.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Research and Statistics
  • Edited by Kenneth D. Keith, University of San Diego
  • Book: Culture across the Curriculum
  • Online publication: 30 March 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316996706.011
Available formats
×