Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:17:40.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Imaginative Play

from SECTION ONE - CREATIVITY AND REASON IN CHILDHOOD AND THE SCHOOLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Sandra W. Russ
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Olena Zyga
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Pretend play is a perfect vehicle for developing imagination in children. Pretend play involves self-generated manipulation of components of imagination. When playing, children manipulate mental representations, imagery, and memories and act them out. Many of these mental components are associated with emotion. Emotion-laden cognition, fantasies, and scripts are played out in a pretend world. The child creates new scripts, fuses images and memories, and generates new ideas. All of these mental events are important in creativity. Theoretically, these manipulations of components of imagination within pretend play should set the stage for creative thought. Pretend play helps children develop creative capacities. This chapter reviews theoretical approaches to imaginative play and creativity, research evidence, and neurological findings and theory that have implications for the development of imagination in play.

Pretend Play, Imagination, and Creativity

Pretend play is a symbolic behavior in which “one thing is playfully treated ‘as if’ it were something else” (Fein, 1987, p. 282). Fein (1987) also stressed the importance of affect expression in pretend play – cognitive and affective processes are intertwined in pretend play expressions. Singer and Singer (2013) have long proposed that pretend play serves as a “critical precursor” (p. 11) for the development of forming experiences into narratives, for guiding thought processes, and for noticing the content of one's stream of consciousness. Because so many of the cognitive and affective processes in pretend play are also involved in creative expression, pretend play is thought to be a precursor of creativity (Fein, 1987; Singer & Singer, 1990; Russ, 1993, 2014).

Russ (1993; 2014), based on both clinical and research literatures, articulated cognitive and affective processes that occur in imaginative pretend play. Cognitive processes involved in play include organization of narratives, symbolism, divergent thinking, fantasy/make-believe, and recombining and manipulating images and story events. A child demonstrates organization and imagination when he or she is able to tell a coherent story with fantasy sequences. Divergent thinking is a child's ability to create a multitude of different ideas that are not confined to conventional ways of thinking or problem solving and to use objects to represent different things, such as when a stick is used as a birthday candle. Fantasy/make-believe refers to a child's ability to pretend that he or she is in a different place or time and role play with various objects and other people.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, L. E., & Meyers, A. B. (2013). The role of make-believe play in the development of executive function: Status of research and future directions. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 98–110.Google Scholar
Bodrova, E., Germeroth, C., & Leong, D. J. (2013). Play and self-regulation: Lessons from Vygotsky. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 111–123.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (2005). The genesis of animal play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 72(4), 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11(2), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, S. M., White, R. E., & Davis-Unger, A. C. (2014). Evidence for a relation between executive function and pretense representation in preschool children. Cognitive Development, 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, P. (1994). Academic Play. In Hellendoorn, J., Kooij, R. Van der, & Sutton-Smith, B. (Eds.), Play and intervention (pp. 203–213). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dansky, J. (1980). Make-believe: A mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Development, 51, 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansky, J. (1999). Play. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 393–408). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dansky, J., & Silverman, F. (1973). Effects of play on associative fluency in preschool-aged children. Developmental Psychology, 9, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2014). Relations between false belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 85(5), 1777–1794.Google ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fein, G. G. (1987). Pretend play: Creativity and consciousness. In Gorlitz, P. & Wohlwill, J. (Eds.), Curiosity, imagination and play (pp. 281–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
German, T. P., Niehaus, J. L., Roarty, M. P., Giesbrecht, B., & Miller, M. B. (2004). Neural correlates of detecting pretense: Automatic engagement of the intentional stance under covert conditions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1805–1817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, J., & Russ, S. (2012). Pretend play, creativity, and emotion regulation in children. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J., (in press). Fostering pretend play skills in elementary school girls: A group play intervention. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts.
Holt, R. (1977). A method for assessing primary process manifestations and their control in Rorschach responses. In Rickers-Ovsiankina, M. (Ed.), Rorschach psychology (pp. 375–420). New York: Kreiger.Google Scholar
Hsu, N. S., Novick, J. M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2014). The development and malleability of executive control abilities. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasari, C., Freeman, S., & Paparella, T. (2006). Joint attention and symbolic play in young children with autism: A randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 611–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaugars, A. S., & Russ, S. W. (2009). Assessing preschool children's pretend play: Preliminary validation of the affect in play scale-preschool version. Early Education and Development, 20(5), 733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child's theory of mind. Child Development, 64(2), 348–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2014). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind. Child Development, 85(4), 1535–1551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, M., & Russ, S. W. (2008). Follow-up of a pretend play intervention: Effects on play, creativity, and emotional processes in children. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, L. D., Guhn, A., Zeller, J. B., Biehl, S. C., Dresler, T., Hahn, T., … Herrmann, M. J. (2014). Neural correlates of a standardized version of the trail making test in young and elderly adults: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuropsychologia, 56, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2000). A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition, 74(2), 115–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Russ, S. (2004). Play in child development and psychotherapy: Toward empirically supported practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, S. (in press). Play: A multipurpose vehicle (Commentary). In Kaufman, A. & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), Animal creativity and innovation. San Diego: Academic Press.
Russ, S. W., & Grossman-McKee, A. (1990). Affective expression in children's fantasy play, primary process thinking on the Rorschach, and divergent thinking. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54(3–4), 756–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russ, S. W., & Kaugars, A. (2000–2001). Emotion in children's play and creative problem solving. Creative Research Journal, 13, 211–219.Google Scholar
Russ, S. W., Moore, M., & Farber, B. (2004, July). Effects of play training on play, creativity and emotional processes. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
Russ, S. W., Robins, A. L., & Christiano, B. A. (1999). Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, S. W., & Schafer, E. D. (2006). Affect in fantasy play, emotion in memories, and divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, S. W., & Wallace, C. E. (2013). Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 136–148.Google Scholar
Singer, D. L., & Rummo, J. (1973). Ideational creativity and behavioral style in kindergarten-age children. Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (1990). The house of make-believe: Children's play and the developing imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, D. G. & Singer, J. L.(2013). Reflections on pretend play, imagination, and child development: An interview with Dorothy G. and Jerome Singer. American Journal of Play, 6, 1–14.
Smith, E. D., Englander, Z. A., Lillard, A. S., & Morris, J. P. (2013). Cortical mechanisms of pretense observation. Social Neuroscience, 8(4), 356–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P. K., & Whitney, S. (1987). Play and associative fluency: Experimenter effects may be responsible for previous positive findings. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waelder, R. (1933). The psychoanalytic theory of play. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 2, 208–224.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. E., & Russ, S. W. (2015). Pretend play, divergent thinking, and math achievement in girls: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, C., Marchant, J. L., Craik, D., & Frith, C. D. (2009). Neural correlates of observing pretend play in which one object is represented as another. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmsmeier, A., Ohrmann, P., Suslow, T., Siegmund, A., Koelkebeck, K., Rothermundt, M., … Pedersen, A. (2010). Neural correlates of set-shifting: decomposing executive functions in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience: JPN, 35(5), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Imaginative Play
  • Edited by James C. Kaufman, University of Connecticut, John Baer, Rider University, New Jersey
  • Book: Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Imaginative Play
  • Edited by James C. Kaufman, University of Connecticut, John Baer, Rider University, New Jersey
  • Book: Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Imaginative Play
  • Edited by James C. Kaufman, University of Connecticut, John Baer, Rider University, New Jersey
  • Book: Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.004
Available formats
×