2003). Just Sustainabilities: Development in An Unequal World. London: Earthscan/The MIT Press., , and (
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (1999). Waiting for a signal: Public attitudes toward global warming, the environment and geophysical research. Report available at: http://www.ago.org/sci_soc/attitude_study.pdf
1994). Media (mis)communication on the science of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 259–75. (
2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–18., , and (
1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 959–70., , , et al. (
2001). American attitudes to the environment and global warming: An overview of public opinion. Report prepared for the FrameWorks Institute, Washington, DC. (
2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 2, 125–36. and (
Boyle, R. H. (1999). “You're getting warmer …” Audobon Magazine (November/December). Available at: http://magazine.audobon.org/global.html; accessed June 15, 2005.
2003). Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the world? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 10, 106–34. (
Brewer, T. L. (2003). US public opinion on climate change issues: Evidence for 1989–2002. Available at: http://www.ceps.be; accessed January 5, 2006.
2004). Communicating Uncertainty in the Science of Climate Change: An Overview of Efforts to Reduce Miscommunication Between the Research Community and Policymakers and the Public. Washington, DC: International Center for Technology Assessment. (
2001). Influence: Science and Practice, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. (
Clark, W. C., et al. (2001). Acid rain, ozone depletion, and climate change: An historical overview. In Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 1, Social Learning Group, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–55.
1994). Informal Science Learning: What the Research Says About Television, Science Museums, and Community-Based Projects. Ephrata, PA: Science Press., , , et al. (
1995). Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 341–61. (
Department of Energy (DOE), Information Administration (2005). Monthly Energy Review, January, Table 1.3, p. 7.
2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–12., , and (
2002). The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. and (eds.) (
2003). Leading Change Toward Sustainability. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing. (
Eastland, T. (2005). The collapse of big media: Starting over. Wilson Quarterly, (Spring).
Environics International (1998). The International Environmental Monitor, Vol. 1: Citizens Worldwide Want Tough Environmental Action Now. Available at: http://www.mori.com/polls/1998/iem_02.shtml; accessed January 10, 2006.
Field, C. B., Raupach, M. R., and Victoria, R. (2004). The global carbon cycle: Integrating humans, climate and the natural world. In The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate and the Natural World, eds. and SCOPE Report #62, Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 1–13.
2004). Is there a market for nonpartisan news? Media Commentary. Business Week, November 29. (
Futerra (2005a). UK Communications Strategy on Climate Change. London: Futerra.
Futerra (2005b). The Rules of the Game: Principles of Climate Change Communication. London: Futerra.
2005). Pathways to environmental change. Ecological Economics, 52, 417–20. (
Hansen, J. E. (1988). Testimony before US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Greenhouse effect and climate change, 100th Congress, 1st Session, June 23.
1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–8. (
Harper, D. (2001). Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: http://www.etymonline.com/, accessed March 28, 2005.
2001). The Limits of Policy Change: Incrementalism, Worldview, and the Rule of Law. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. (
2004). Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 4, 409–22. and (
2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science, 298, 981–7., et al. (
2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., , et al. (eds.) (
forthcoming). Ignition: The Birth of the New Climate Movement Washington, DC: Island Press. and (
1996). Scientific uncertainty and the political process. Annals AAPSS, 545, May, 35–43. (
Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., and Dow, K. (2001). Vulnerability, equity, and global environmental change. In Global Environmental Risk, eds. and London: Earthscan, pp. 247–72.
1991). Developmental and geographical equity in global environmental change. Evaluation Review, 15, 149–71. and (
Kasperson, R. E. and Kasperson, J. X. (1991). Hidden hazards. In Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, eds. and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–28.
1991). Public understanding of global warming. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 4, 331–45. (
2004). Outcome-oriented leadership: How state and local climate change strategies can most effectively contribute to global warming mitigation. Widener Law Journal, 14, 173–204., et al. (
Kull, S., et al. (2004). Americans on climate change. Menlo Park, CA: Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), University of Maryland and Knowledge Networks.
Leaman, J. and Norton, A. (2004). The Day After Tomorrow – are the British too cool on climate change? London: MORI Social Research Unit, UK, Prime Minister's Strategy.
2004). Before and after The Day After Tomorrow: A US study of climate change risk perception. Environment, 46, 9, 22–37. (
Leiserowitz, A. (2003). American opinions on global warming. Project report. University of Oregon.
1959). The science of “muddling through.”Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88. (
Luers, A. L. and Moser, S. C. (2006). Preparing for the Impacts of Climate Change in California: Advancing the Debate on Adaptation. CEC-500-2005-198-SD, Report prepared for the California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program and the California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
1998). Coming Back to Life: Practices to Reconnect Our Lives, Our World. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers. and (
2004). Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 295–308. and (
2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., , , et al. (eds.) (
2001). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 4, 499–522. and (
2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348–73. and (
2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–7. (
2003). Laboratories for local solutions for global problems: State, local and private leadership in developing strategies to mitigate the causes and effects of climate change. Penn State Environmental Law Review, 12, 15–82. (
2004). Blinded by science: How “balanced” coverage lets the scientific fringe hijack reality (State of the Beat). Columbia Journalism Review, 6, November/December; available at: http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/6/mooney-science.asp, accessed June 15, 2005. (
2002). Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press., et al. (
2004). Making climate hot: Communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment, 46, 10, 32–46. and (
1998). Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (
Nabi, R. L. (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, eds. and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 289–308.
National Research Council (NRC) (2002). The Drama of the Commons. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) Geophysics Study Committee (1977). Energy and Climate. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2002). The Love of Nature and the End of the World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (
2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10, 221–32. and (
O'Keefe, D. J. (2002a). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, eds. and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 329–44.
O'Keefe, D. J. (2002b). Guilt and social influence. In Communication Yearbook23, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 67–101.
2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686. (
2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305, 968–72. and (
1997). Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 1, 49–68. (
1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn. New York: Macmillan and Co. (
1998). Human Choice & Climate Change. What Have We Learned? Vol. 4. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press. and (eds.) (
1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14, 6, 971–82., et al. (
1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. New York: Free Press. (
2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 385–403. (
2001). Issue attention, framing, and actors: An analysis of patterns across arenas. In Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 1, Social Learning Group, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 349–62., et al. (
2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for the self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–39. (
2000). Global climate change and public perception: The challenge of translation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 2, 253–63., , and (
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York: Doubleday.
1996). Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 275–302. and (
2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219–37., , and (
2002). Communicating climate change. Science, 297, 737. (
2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: Climate change versus ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297–312. (
1992). The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. The Sociological Quarterly, 33, 483–501. (
Union of Concerned Scientists (2005). Clean Energy. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/renewable_energy/index.cfm, accessed June 9, 2005.
Voice of America (2004). US Plans to Emphasize Climate Change Adaptation at Upcoming Conference. December 3; available at: http://www.voanews.com/english/2004-12-03-voa83, accessed June 9, 2005.
1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. The American Political Science Review, 63, 3, 880–99. (
2003). The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (
1993). Between facts and values: Print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987–1990. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 1, 71–84. (
2000). Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 1, 1–13. (