Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:44:39.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Reputation

A Fundamental Route to Human Cooperation

from Part I - Broad Insights from Political Science to Molecular Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Walter Wilczynski
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Sarah F. Brosnan
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access

Summary

Humans are a remarkably social species. They form and live in groups and recurrently have to decide whether to cooperate or compete with others within and among groups. Cooperation has been essential for group survival and prosperity across human history. In hunter-gatherer societies, people need to form alliances in hunting to alleviate the risks from predator attacks. Likewise, modern societies require groups of people to cooperate in large ventures. Yet, social situations often involve a conflict between one’s short-term personal interest and the long-term collective interest (i.e., social dilemmas; Dawes, 1980; Van Lange et al., 2013). In such mixed-motive situations, what is good for an individual may often harm the collective, and this makes people tempted to free ride and harvest the benefits from others’ cooperation. Indeed, many societal problems and global issues (e.g., traffic problems, environmental pollution, and resource depletion) involve such conflicts of interests. Solving these problems often requires individuals to cooperate by paying a personal cost to benefit another person or the group.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cooperation and Conflict
The Interaction of Opposites in Shaping Social Behavior
, pp. 45 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahao, B., Parigi, P., Gupta, A., and Cook, K. S. (2017) Reputation offsets trust judgments based on social biases among Airbnb users. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114: 98489853.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., and Shirako, A. (2008) Are individuals’ reputations related to their history of behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94: 320333.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., and Christakis, N. A. (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature, 481: 497501.Google Scholar
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., and Meier, S. (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99: 544555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2011) Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 594615.Google Scholar
Balliet, D., Wu, J., and De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140: 15561581.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2006) Reputational benefits for altruistic punishmentEvolution and Human Behavior27: 325344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, P. (2012) Harnessing the power of reputation: Strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 10: 868883.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. (2013) Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34: 164175.Google Scholar
Barclay, P., and Raihani, N. (2016) Partner choice versus punishment in human prisoner’s dilemmasEvolution and Human Behavior, 37: 263271.Google Scholar
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., and Roberts, G. (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2: 412414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromley, D. B. (1993) Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bshary, R., and Grutter, A. S. (2006) Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441: 975978.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Capraro, V., Giardini, F., Vilone, D., and Paolucci, M. (2016) Partner selection supported by opaque reputation promotes cooperative behavior. Judgment and Decision Making, 11: 589600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., and Pagliaro, S. (2015) Who cares for reputation? Individual differences and concern for reputation. Current Psychology, 34: 164176.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 169193.Google Scholar
dos Santos, M., Rankin, D. J., and Wedekind, C. (2013) Human cooperation based on punishment reputation. Evolution, 67: 24462450.Google Scholar
dos Santos, M., and Wedekind, C. (2015) Reputation based on punishment rather than generosity allows for evolution of cooperation in sizable groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36: 5964.Google Scholar
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., and Nowak, M. A. (2008) Winners don’t punish. Nature452: 348351.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004) Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8: 100110.Google Scholar
Durand, J. D. (1977) Historical estimates of world population: An evaluation. Population and Development Review, 3: 253296.Google Scholar
Egas, M., and Riedl, A. (2008) The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperationProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences275: 871878.Google Scholar
Emler, N. (1990) A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1: 171193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2012) Five-year olds, but not chimpanzees, attempt to manage their reputations. PLoS ONE, 7: e48433.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2016) Preschoolers affect others’ reputations through prosocial gossipBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology34: 447460.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2013) Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16: 952958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415: 137140.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Cheng, J. T., and Willer, R. (2012) Gossip as an effective and low-cost form of punishmentBehavioral and Brain Sciences35: 25.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., and Schultz, M. (2014) Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25: 656664.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., and Keltner, D. (2012) The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102: 10151030.Google Scholar
Gallo, E., and Yan, C. (2015) The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112: 36473652.Google Scholar
Grimalda, G., Pondorfer, A., and Tracer, D. P. (2016) Social image concerns promote cooperation more than altruistic punishment. Nature Communications, 7: 12288.Google Scholar
Gross, T., and Blasius, B. (2008) Adaptive coevolutionary networks: A review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5: 259271.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1752.Google Scholar
Haux, L., Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., and Tomasello, M. (2017) Do young children preferentially trust gossip or firsthand observation in choosing a collaborative partner? Social Development, 26: 466474.Google Scholar
Hess, N. H., and Hagen, E. H. (2006) Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17: 337354.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., and Rand, D. G. (2016) Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530: 473476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato-Shimizu, M., Onishi, K., Kanazawa, T., and Hinobayashi, T. (2013) Preschool children’s behavioral tendency toward social indirect reciprocity. PLoS ONE, 8: e70915.Google Scholar
Kenward, B., and Dahl, M. (2011) Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients’ previous actions. Developmental Psychology, 47: 10541064.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1989) Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 287313.Google Scholar
Khadjavi, M. (2016) Indirect reciprocity and charitable giving – Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 63: 37083717.Google Scholar
Kraft-Todd, G., Yoeli, E., Bhanot, S., and Rand, D. (2015) Promoting cooperation in the field. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3: 96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlman, D. M., and Marshello, A. F. (1975) Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 922931.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., and West, S. A. (2015) The evolution of altruism in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 66: 575599.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., and O’Brien, E. (2007) Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28: 7584.Google Scholar
Leimar, O., and Hammerstein, P. (2001) Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268: 745753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlan, S. J., Quinlan, R., and Remiker, M. (2013) Cooperative behaviour and prosocial reputation dynamics in a Dominican village. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280: 20130557.Google Scholar
Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P. A. M., and Pollet, T. V. (2016) Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14: 1474704916640780.Google Scholar
Meristo, M., and Surian, L. (2013) Do infants detect indirect reciprocity? Cognition, 129: 102113.Google Scholar
Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., and Yamagishi, T. (2010) Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31: 109117.Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., and Krambeck, H.-J. (2002) Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269: 881883.Google Scholar
Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., and Wilke, H. A. M. (2006) Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42: 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelissen, R. M. A. (2008) The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29: 242248.Google Scholar
Nettle, D., Nott, K., and Bateson, M. (2012) “Cycle thieves, we are watching you”: Impact of a simple signage intervention against bicycle theft. PLoS ONE, 7: 812.Google Scholar
Nikiforakis, N. (2008) Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92: 91112.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., and Miyamoto, Y. (2005) The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 467473.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314: 15601563.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393: 573577.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194: 561574.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., and Sigmund, K. (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 437: 129111298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtsuki, H., and Iwasa, Y. (2007) Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 244: 518531.Google Scholar
Olson, K. R., and Spelke, E. S. (2008) Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108: 222231.Google Scholar
Pacheco, J. M., Santos, F. C., and Chalub, F. A. C. (2006) Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity. PLoS Computational Biology, 2: e178.Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K., and Boyd, R. (2003) A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224: 115126.Google Scholar
Panchanathan, K., and Boyd, R. (2004) Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problemNature432: 499502.Google Scholar
Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M., and Rand, D. G. (2014) Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5: 4939.Google Scholar
Pfattheicher, S. (2015) A regulatory focus perspective on reputational concerns: The impact of prevention-focused self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 39: 932942.Google Scholar
Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., and Ingram, G. (2011) “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109: 311320.Google Scholar
Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., and Nettle, D. (2012) Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118: 10961101.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., Arbesman, S., and Christakis, N. A. (2011) Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108: 1919319198.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., and Nowak, M. A. (2013) Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17: 413425.Google Scholar
Romano, A., Balliet, D., and Wu, J. (2017a) Unbounded indirect reciprocity: Is reputation-based cooperation bounded by group membership?  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71: 5967.Google Scholar
Romano, A., Balliet, D., Yamagishi, T., and Liu, J. H. (2017b) Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114: 1270212707.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., and Royzman, E. B. (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5: 296320.Google Scholar
Russell, Y. I., Call, J., and Dunbar, R. I. (2008) Image scoring in great apes. Behavioural Processes, 78: 108111.Google Scholar
Semmann, D., Krambeck, H., and Milinski, M. (2005) Reputation is valuable within and outside one's own social group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57: 611616.Google Scholar
Simpson, B., and Willer, R. (2008) Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71: 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., and Conrey, F. R. (2007) Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11: 87104.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., and Milinski, M. (2007) Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104: 1743517440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparks, A., and Barclay, P. (2013) Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34: 317322.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., and Baumard, N. (2012) Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind and Language, 27: 495518.Google Scholar
Subiaul, F., Vonk, J., Okamoto-Barth, S., and Barth, J. (2008) Do chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers. Animal Cognition, 11: 611623.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., and Akiyama, E. (2005) Reputation and the evolution of cooperation in sizable groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272: 13731377.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., and Akiyama, E. (2007) Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245: 539552.Google Scholar
Swakman, V., Molleman, L., Ule, A., and Egas, M. (2016) Reputation-based cooperation: Empirical evidence for behavioral strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37: 230235.Google Scholar
Tazelaar, M. J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., and Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2004) How to cope with “noise” in social dilemmas: The benefits of communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 845859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruismQuarterly Review of Biology, 46: 3557.Google Scholar
van Apeldoorn, J., and Schram, A. (2016) Indirect reciprocity: A field experiment. PloS ONE, 11: e0152076.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., and Van Dijk, E. (2013) The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120: 125141.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., and Hardy, C. L. (2010) Cooperation for reputation: Wasteful contributions as costly signals in public goods. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13: 101111.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., and Hardy, C. (2007) Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In Dunbar, R., and Barrett, L., eds., Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 531540.Google Scholar
Vonasch, A. J., Reynolds, T., Winegard, B. M., and Baumeister, R. F. (2017) Death before dishonor: Incurring costs to protect moral reputation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9: 604613.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C., and Braithwaite, V. A. (2002) The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocityCurrent Biology12: 10121015.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C., and Milinski, M. (2000) Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288: 850852.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015) When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6: 923930.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016a) Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6: 23919.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016b) Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37: 193201.Google Scholar
Wu, J. J., Zhang, B. Y., Zhou, Z. X., He, Q. Q., Zheng, X. D., Cressman, R., and Tao, Y. (2009) Costly punishment does not always increase cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106: 1744817451.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., and Kiyonari, T. (1999) Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. In Lawler, E. J. (Series ed.) and Thye, S. R., Lawler, E. J., Macy, M. W., and Walker, H. A. (Vol. eds.), Advances in Group Processes. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 161197.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., and Kiyonari, T. (2000) The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63: 116132.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., and Mifune, N. (2008) Does shared group membership promote altruism? Fear, greed, and reputation. Rationality and Society, 20: 530.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y. et al. (2013) Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120: 260271.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, H., Okada, I., Uchida, S., and Sasaki, T. (2017) A norm knockout method on indirect reciprocity to reveal indispensable normsScientific Reports7: 44146.Google Scholar
Yaniv, I., and Kleinberger, E. (2000) Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83: 260281.Google Scholar
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., and Nowak, M. A. (2013) Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110: 1042410429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, M., Wu, J., and Kou, Y. (2018) Donors’ social class and their prosocial reputation: Perceived authentic motivation as an underlying mechanism. Social Psychology, 49: 205218.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A. (1997) The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×