References

Antony Jameson

doi:10.1017/9781108943345.024

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2022

Antony Jameson

Show author details

Antony Jameson: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Computational Aerodynamics , pp. 589 - 606

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943345.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abarbanel, S. & Gottlieb, D. (1981). “Optimal time splitting for two- and three-dimensional navier-stokes equations with mixed derivatives.” Journal of Computational Physics 41(1): 1–33.Google Scholar

Abbott, Ira H. & Von Doenhoff, A. E. (1959). Theory of Wing Sections, Including a Summary of Airfoil Data. Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Abgrall, R. (2006). “Residual distribution schemes: Current status and future trends.” Computers and Fluids 35: 641–669.Google Scholar

Aftosmis, M. J., Melton, J. E., & Berger, M. J. (1995). “Adaptation and surface modeling for Cartesian mesh methods.” AIAA paper 95-1725-CP, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conlerence, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Ahlstrom, E., Gregg, R., Vassberg, J., & Jameson, A. (2000). “G-Force: The design of an unlimited class Reno racer.” AIAA paper 4341, AIAA 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Denver, CO.Google Scholar

Ahrabi, B., Mavriplis, D. J., & Brazell, M. (2019). “Accelerating Newton method continuation for CFD problems.” AIAA paper 2019-0100, AIAA SciTech Meeting, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Allmaras, S. (1993). “Analysis of a local matrix preconditioner for the 2-D Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 93-3330, AIAA 11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Allmaras, S. (1995). “Analysis of semi-implicit preconditioners for multigrid solution of the 2-D Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 95-1651, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Allmaras, S. (1997). “Algebraic smoothing analysis of multigrid methods for the 2-D compressible Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 97-1954, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO.Google Scholar

Alonso, J. J. & Jameson, A. (1994). “Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions.” AIAA paper 94-0056, AIAA 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Alonso, J. J., Martinelli, L., & Jameson, A. (1995). “Multigrid unsteady Navier-Stokes calculations with aeroelastic applications.” AIAA paper 95-0048, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. K. & Venkatakrishnan, V. (1997). “Aerodynamic design and optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation.” AIAA paper 97-0643, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. K., Thomas, J. L., & Whitfield, D. L. (1986). “Multigrid acceleration of the flux split euler equations.” AIAA paper 86-0274, AIAA 24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Argyris, J. H. (1954a). “Energy theorems and structural analysis: A generalized discourse with applications on energy principles of structural analysis including the effects of temperature and non-Linear stress-strain relations.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 26(11):383–394.CrossRef Google Scholar

Argyris, J. H. (1954b). “Flexure-torsion failure of panels: A study of instability and failure of stiffened panels under compression when buckling in long wavelengths.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 26(6):174–184.Google Scholar

Argyris, J. H. (1954c). “The open tube: A study of thin-walled structures such as interspar wing cut-outs and open-section stringers.” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 26(4):102–112.CrossRef Google Scholar

Argyris, J. H. (1960). Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis: A Generalised Discourse with Applications on Energy Principles of Structural Analysis Including the Effects of Temperature and Nonlinear Stress-Strain Relations. Butterworth.Google Scholar

Arminjon, P. & Dervieux, A. (1989). “Construction of TVD-like artificial viscosities on 2-dimensional arbitrary FEM grids.” INRIA Report 1111.Google Scholar

Arnold, D. N. (1982). “An interior penalty finite element method with discontinuous elements.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 19(4):742–760.Google Scholar

Ashley, H. & Landahl, M. (1985). Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies. Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Baker, T. J. (1986). “Mesh generation by a sequence of transformations.” Applied Numerical Mathematics 2:515–528.Google Scholar

Bakhvalov, N. S. (1966). “On the convergence of a relaxation method with natural constraints on the elliptic operator.” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 6(5):101–135.Google Scholar

Balan, A., May, G., & Schöberl, J. (2012). “A stable high-order spectral difference method for hyperbolic conservation laws on triangular elements.” Journal of Computational Physics 231(5):2359–2375.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., & Reynolds, W. C. (1980). “Improved subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulation.” AIAA paper 80-1357, AlAA 13th Fluid & Plasma Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO.Google Scholar

Bardina, J. & Lombard, C. K. (1987). “Three dimensional hypersonic flow simulations with the CSCM implicit upwind Navier-Stokes method.” AIAA paper 87-1114, AIAA 8th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Barth, T. J. (1994). “Aspects of unstructured grids and finite volume solvers for the Euler and Navier Stokes equations.” In von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series Notes 1994-05, Brussels.Google Scholar

Barth, T. J. & Jespersen, D. C. (1989). “The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes.” AIAA paper 89-0366, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Bassi, F. & Rebay, S. (1997). “A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations.” Journal of Computational Physics 131(2):267–279.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassi, F. & Rebay, S. (2000). “A high order discontinuous Galerkin method for compressible turbulent flows.” In Cockburn, Bernardo, Karniadakis, George E., & Shu, Chi-Wang (eds.), Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, pp. 77–88. Springer.Google Scholar

Bauer, F., Garabedian, P., & Korn, D. (1972). “A theory of supercritical wing sections, with computer programs and examples.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 66 1:81–83.Google Scholar

Bayliss, A. & Turkel, E. (1982). “Far field boundary conditions for compressible flows.” Journal of Computational Physics 48(2):182–199.Google Scholar

Baysal, O. & Eleshaky, M. E. (1992). “Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics.” AIAA Journal 30(3):718–725.Google Scholar

Beam, R. W. & Warming, R. F. (1976). “An implicit finite difference algorithm for hyperbolic systems in conservation form.” Journal of Computational Physics 23:87–110.CrossRef Google Scholar

Belov, A., Martinelli, L., & Jameson, A. (1995). “A new implicit algorithm with multigrid for unsteady incompressible flow calculations.” AIAA paper 95-0049, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Benek, J. A., Buning, P. G., & Steger, J. L. (1985). “A 3-D chimera grid embedding technique.” AIAA paper 85-1523, AIAA 7th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar

Benek, J. A., Donegan, T. L., & Suhs, N. E. (1987). “Extended chimera grid embedding scheme with applications to viscous flows.” AIAA paper 87-1126, AIAA 8th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Berger, M. & LeVeque, R. J. (1989). “An adaptive Cartesian mesh algorithm for the Euler equations in arbitrary geometries.” AIAA paper 89-1930.Google Scholar

Bijl, H., Carpenter, M. H., Vatsa, V. N., & Kennedy, C. A. (2002). “Implicit time integration schemes for the unsteady compressible Navier-Stokes equations: laminar flow.” Journal of Computational Physics 179(1):313–329.Google Scholar

Bons, N. & Martins, J. (2020). Aerostructural Wing Design Exploration with Multidisciplinary Design Optimization. Aerospace 7(118).Google Scholar

Boom, P. D. & Zingg, D. W. (2013). “High-order implicit time integration for unsteady compressible fluid flow simulation.” AIAA paper 2013-2831, AIAA 21st Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Boris, J. P. & Book, D. L. (1973). “Flux-corrected transport. I. SHASTA, A fluid transport algorithm that works.” Journal of Computational Physics 11(1):38–69.Google Scholar

Boussinesq, J. (1877). Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des Sciences de l’Institut National de France, Tome XXIII. No. 1.Google Scholar

Brandt, A. (1977). “Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary value problems.” Mathematics of Computation 31:333–390.Google Scholar

Bristeau, M.O., Pironneau, O., Glowinski, R., Periaux, J., Perrier, P., & Poirier, G. (1980). “Application of optimal control and finite element methods to the calculation of transonic flows and incompressible viscous flows.” In Proceedings of the IMA Conference on Numerical Methods in Applied Fluid Dynamics, pp. 203–312. (A 82-15826 04-34) Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bristeau, M. O., Glowinski, R., Periaux, J., Perrier, P., Poirier, G., & Pironneau, O. (1981). “Transonic flow simulations by finite elements and least square methods.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Finite Elements in Flow Problems, Banff, Alberta, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar

Bristeau, M. O., Pironneau, O., Glowinski, R., Periaux, J., Perrier, P., & Poirier, G. (1985). “On the numerical solution of nonlinear problems in fluid dynamics by least squares and finite element methods (II). Application to transonic flow simulations.” In St. Doltsinis, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Finite Element Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics, FENOMECH 84, Stuttgart, 1984, pp. 363–394, North Holland.Google Scholar

Bryson, A. E. & Y-Ho, C. (1975). Applied optimal control: Optimization, estimation and control. Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. C. (1964a). “Integration processes based on Radau quadrature formulas.” Mathematics of Computation 18(86):233–244.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. C. (1964b). “Implicit Runge-Kutta processes.” Mathematics of Computation 18(85):50–64.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. C. (1987). The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations: Runge-Kutta and General Linear Methods. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. C. (2003). Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. J. Wiley Ltd.Google Scholar

Canuto, C., Hussaini, M.Y., Quarteroni, A. M., & Zang, T. A. Jr. (1988). Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. M., & Zang, T. A. Jr. (2007a). Spectral Methods, Evolution to Complex Geometries and Applications to Fluid Dynamic. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. M., & Zang, T. A. Jr. (2007b). Spectral Methods, Fundamentals in Single Domains. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Castonguay, P., Vincent, P. E., & Jameson, A. (2012). “A new class of high-order energy stable flux reconstruction schemes for triangular elements.” Journal of Scientific Computing 51(1):224–256.Google Scholar

Castonguay, P., Williams, D. M., Vincent, P. E., & Jameson, A. (2013). “Energy stable flux reconstruction schemes for advection-diffusion problems.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 267:400–417.Google Scholar

Castro, C., Lozano, C., Palacios, F., & Zuazua, E. (2007). “Systematic continuous adjoint approach to viscous aerodynamic design on unstructured grids.” AIAA Journal 45(9):2125–2139.Google Scholar

Caughey, D. A. (1987). “A diagonal implicit multigrid algorithm for the Euler equations.” AIAA paper 87-453, AIAA 25th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Chakravarthy, S. R. (1984). “Relaxation methods for unfactored implicit upwind schemes.” AIAA paper 84-0165, AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Chandrashekar, P. (2013). “Kinetic energy preserving and entropy stable finite volume schemes for compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.” Communications in Computational Physics 14(5):1252–1286.Google Scholar

Clough, R. W. (1960). “The finite element method in plane stress analysis.” In Proceedings of the Second ASCE Conference on Electronic Computation, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Clough, R. W. (2004). “Early history of the finite element method from the view point of a pioneer.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 60(1):283–287.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B., Hou, S., & Shu, C-W. (1990). “The Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. IV. The multidimensional case.” Mathematics of Computation 54(190):545–581.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B., Lin, S-Y., & Shu, C-W. (1989). “TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws III: one-dimensional systems.” Journal of Computational Physics 84(1):90–113.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B. & Shu, C-W. (1989). “TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. II. General framework.” Mathematics of Computation 52(186):411–435.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B. & Shu, C-W. (1998a). “The local discontinuous Galerkin method for timedependent convection-diffusion systems.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 35(6):2440–2463.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B. & Shu, C-W. (1998b). “The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for conservation laws V: multidimensional systems.” Journal of Computational Physics 141(2):199–224.Google Scholar

Cockburn, B. & Shu, C-W. (2001). “Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods for convection-dominated problems.” Journal of Scientific Computing 16(3):173–261.Google Scholar

Collatz, L. (1966). The Numerical Treatment of Differential Equations, Vol. 1. Springer, 3rd edn.Google Scholar

Cooper, G. J. & Sayfy, A. (1983). “Additive Runge-Kutta methods for stiff ordinary differential equations.” Mathematics of Computation 40(161):207–218.Google Scholar

Cooper, G. J. & Sayfy, A. (1980). “Additive methods for the numerical solution of ordinary differential equations.” Mathematics of Computation 35(152):1159–1172.Google Scholar

Courant, R. (1943). “Variational methods for the solution of problems of equilibrium and vibrations.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 49(1):1–23.Google Scholar

Crandall, M. G. & Majda, A. (1980). “Monotone difference approximations for scalar conservation laws.” Mathematics of Computation 34(149):1–21.Google Scholar

Crumpton, P. I. & Giles, M. B. (1995). “Implicit time accurate solutions on unstructured dynamic grids.” AIAA paper 95-1671, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Dahlquist, G. (1956). “Convergence and stability in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations.” Mathematica Scandinavia 4(1):33–53.Google Scholar

Dahlquist, G. (1963). “A special stability problem for linear multistep methods.” BIT 3:27–43.Google Scholar

Davis, P. J. (1975). Interpolation and Approximation. Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Davis, S. S. (1982). “NACA 64A010 (NASA Ames model) oscillatory pitching,” AGARD report 702, AGARD, January 1982.Google Scholar

Delaunay, B. (1934). “Sur la Sphere vide.” Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR VII: Class Scil, Mat. Nat. pp. 793–800.Google Scholar

Desai, M. & Ito, K. (1994). “Optimal controls of Navier-Stokes equations.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 32(5):1428–1446.Google Scholar

Deshpande, S. M., Balakrishnan, N., & Raghurama, S. V. Rao (1994). “PVU and wave-particle splitting schemes for Euler equations of gas dynamics.” Sadhana 19(6):1027–1054.Google Scholar

Dormand, J. R. & Prince, P. J. (1980). “A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 6(1):19–26.Google Scholar

Durbin, P. A. & Pettersson, B. A. Reif (2011). Statistical Theory and Modeling for Turbulent Flows. Wiley.Google Scholar

Economon, T. D., Palacios, F., Copeland, S. R., Lukaczyk, T. W., & Alonso, J. J. (2016). “SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design.” AIAA Journal 54(3):828–846.Google Scholar

Eiseman, P. R. (1979). “A multi-surface method of coordinate generation.” Journal of Computational Physics 33:118–150.Google Scholar

Elliot, J. & Peraire, J. (1996). “Practical 3D aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured meshes.” AIAA paper 96-4710, 6th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary and Optimization Symposium, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Engquist, B. & Majda, A. (1977). “Absorbing boundary conditions for numerical simulation of waves.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 74(5):1765–1766.Google Scholar

Engquist, B. & Osher, S. (1981). “One-sided difference approximations for nonlinear conservation laws.” Mathematics of Computation 36(154):321–351.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eriksson, L. E. (1982). “Generation of boundary-conforming grids around wing-body configurations using transfinite interpolation.” AIAA Journal 20:1313–1320.Google Scholar

Favre, A. J. (1965). “Review on space-time correlations in turbulent fluids.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 32(2):241–257.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fedorenko, R. P. (1964). “The speed of convergence of one iterative process.” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 4:227–235.Google Scholar

Fehlberg, E. (1969). “Low-order classical Runge-Kutta formulas with stepsize control and their application to some heat transfer problems.” Technical Report NASA-TR-R-315, NASA Technical Report, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center; Huntsville, AL.Google Scholar

Fisher, T. C. & Carpenter, M. H. (2013). “High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws: Finite domains.” Journal of Computational Physics 252: 518–557.Google Scholar

Gaitonde, D. V. & Visbal, M. R. (1998). “High-order schemes for Navier-Stokes equations: Algorithm and implementation into FDL3DI.” Technical Report AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3060, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB.Google Scholar

Garabedian, P. R. (1956). “Estimation of the relaxation factor for small mesh size.” Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation pp. 183–185.Google Scholar

Germano, M. (1986a). “Differential filters for the large eddy numerical simulation of turbulent flows.” Physics of Fluids 29(6):1755–1757.Google Scholar

Germano, M. (1986b). “Differential filters of elliptic type.” Physics of Fluids 29(6):1757–1758.Google Scholar

Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., & Cabot, W. H. (1991). “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model.” Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics (1989-1993) 3(7):1760–1765.Google Scholar

Giles, M., Drela, M., & Thompkins, W. T. (1985). “Newton solution of direct and inverse transonic Euler equations.” AIAA paper 85-1530, Cincinnati.Google Scholar

Glauert, H. (1926). The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Godunov, S. K. (1959). “A difference method for the numerical calculation of discontinuous solutions of hydrodynamic equations.” Matematicheskii Sbornik 47:271–306. Translated as JPRS 7225 by U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1960.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, D. & Orszag, S. A. (1977). Numerical Analysis of Spectral Methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, S., Ketcheson, D. I., & Shu, C-W. (2009). “High order strong stability preserving time discretizations.” Journal of Scientific Computing 38(3):251–289.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, S., Ketcheson, D. I., & Shu, C-W. (2011). Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations. World Scientific.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, S. & Shu, C-W. (1998). “Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes.” Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society 67(221):73–85.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, S., Shu, C-W., & Tadmor, E. (2001). “Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods.” SIAM Review 43(1):89–112.Google Scholar

Gourlay, A. R. & Mitchell, A. R. (1966). “A stable implicit difference scheme for hyperbolic systems in two space variables.” Numerische Mathematik 8:367–375.Google Scholar

Guermond, J-L., Pasquetti, R., & Popov, B. (2011). “Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws.” Journal of Computational Physics 230(11):4248–4267.Google Scholar

Gustaffson, B., Kreiss, H-O., & Oliger, J. (2013). Time-Dependent Problems and Difference Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, B. (1975). “The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems.” Mathematics of Computation 29(130):396–406.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, B., Kreiss, H-O., & Sundström, A. (1972). “Stability theory of difference approximations for mixed initial boundary value problems. II.” Mathematics of Computation 26(119):649–686.Google Scholar

Haase, W., Chaput, E., Elsholz, E., Leschziner, M. A., & Mueller, U. R. (1997). ECARP: European Computational Aerodynamics Research Project: Validation of CFD Codes and Assessment of Turbulence Models, Vol. 58. Friedr Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Hackbusch, W. (1978). “On the multi-grid method applied to difference equations.” Computing 20:291–306.Google Scholar

Hall, M. G. (1985). “Cell vertex multigrid schemes for solution of the Euler equations.” In Morton, K. W. & Baines, M. J. (eds.), IMA Conference on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, University Reading, pp. 303–345. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harten, A. (1983). “High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws.” Journal of Computational Physics 49:357–393.Google Scholar

Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., & Chakravarthy, S. R. (1987). “Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III.” Journal of Computational Physics 71(2):231–303.Google Scholar

Harten, A., Hyman, J. M., Lax, P. D., & Keyfitz, B. (1976). “On finite-difference approximations and entropy conditions for shocks.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 29(3):297–322.Google Scholar

Harten, A., Lax, P. D., & Van, B. Leer (1983). “On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws.” SIAM Review 25:35–61.Google Scholar

Hayes, W. D. (1947). Linearized supersonic flow. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Hemker, P. W. & Spekreijse, S. P. (1984). “Multigrid solution of the steady Euler equations.” In Proceedings of the Oberwolfach Meeting on Multigrid Methods.Google Scholar

Henrici, P. (1962). Discrete Variable Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations, Vol. 1. Wiley.Google Scholar

Hess, J. L. & Smith, A. M. O. (1962). “Calculation of the non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three dimensional bodies.” Douglas Aircraft Report, ES 40622.Google Scholar

Hesthaven, J. S., Gottlieb, S., & Gottlieb, D. (2007). Spectral Methods for Time-Dependent Problems, vol. 21. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hesthaven, J. S. & Warburton, T. (2008). Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications, Vol. 54. Springer.Google Scholar

Hicken, J. E. & Zingg, D. W. (2008). “Parallel Newton-Krylov solver for the Euler equations discretized using simultaneous approximation terms.” AIAA Journal 46(11):2773–2786.Google Scholar

Hicks, R. M. & Henne, P. A. (1979). “Wing design by numerical optimization.” AIAA paper 79-0080, AIAA 17th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Hicks, R. M., Murman, E. M., & Vanderplaats, G. N. (1974). “An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization.” NASA TM X-3092, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.Google Scholar

Huan, J. C. & Modi, V. (1994). “Optimum design for drag minimizing bodies in incompressible flow.” Inverse Problems in Engineering 1:1–25.Google Scholar

Hughes, T. J. R., Franca, L. P., & Mallet, M. (1986a). “A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 54(2):223–234.Google Scholar

Hughes, T. J. R., Mallet, M., & Akira, M. (1986b). “A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: II. Beyond SUPG.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 54(3):341–355.Google Scholar

Hunt, B. (1980). “The mathematical basis and numerical principles of the boundary integral method for incompressible potential flow over 3-D aerodynamic configurations.” Numerical Methods in Applied Fluid Dynamics pp. 39–135.Google Scholar

Huynh, H. T. (2007). “A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous Galerkin methods.” AIAA paper 2007-4079, AIAA 18th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Huynh, H. T. (2009). “A reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous Galerkin for diffusion.” AIAA paper 2009-403, AIAA 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Iserles, A. (1982). “Order stars and a saturation theorem for first-order hyperbolics.” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 2(1):49–61.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1974). “Iterative solution of transonic flows over airfoils and wings, including flows at mach 1.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 27:283–309.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1978). “Remarks on the calculation of transonic potential flow by a finite volume method.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Mathematics and Applications.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1979). “Acceleration of it’s transonic potential flow calculations on arbitrary meshes by the multiple grid method.” AIAA paper 79-1458, AIAA 4th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1983). “Solution of the Euler equations by a multigrid method.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 13:327–356.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1984). “A non-oscillatory shock capturing scheme using flux limited dissipation.” Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Engquist, B. E., Osher, S., and Sommerville, R. C. J., (eds.), A.M.S., Part 1, 22:345–370, 1985.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1986a). “Multigrid algorithms for compressible flow calculations.” In Hackbusch, W. & Trottenberg, U. (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1228, pp. 166–201. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1986b). “A vertex based multigrid algorithm for three-dimensional compressible flow calculations.” In Tezduar, T. E. & Hughes, T. J. R. (eds.), Numerical Methods for Compressible Flow - Finite Difference, Element And Volume Techniques. ASME Publication AMD 78.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1988). “Aerodynamic design via control theory.” Journal of Scientific Computing 3:233–260.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1989). “Computational aerodynamics for aircraft design.” Science 245(4916): 361–371.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1990). “Automatic design of transonic airfoils to reduce the shock induced pressure drag.” In Proceedings of the 31st Israel Annual Conference on Aviation and Aeronautics, Tel Aviv, pp. 5–17. Citeseer.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1991). “Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings.” AIAA paper 91-1596, AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1993). “Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence in transonic and hypersonic flows.” AIAA paper 93-3359, AIAA 11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1994). “Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control.” AGARD FDP/Von Karman Institute Lecture Notes on Optimum Design Methods in Aerodynamics. AGARD Report 803, pages 3-1 to 3-33, 1994.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1995a). “Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics 1, artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on multigrid convergence.” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 4:171–218.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1995b). “Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics 2, artificial diffusion and discrete shock structure.” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 5:1–38.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1995c). “Optimum aerodynamic design using the control theory.” Computational Fluid Dynamics Review pp. 495–528.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (1997). “Reengineering the design process through computation.” AIAA paper 97-0641, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exibit, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (2008). “The construction of discretely conservative finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy.” Journal of Scientific Computing 34(2):152–187.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (2010). “A proof of the stability of the spectral difference method for all orders of accuracy.” Journal of Scientific Computing 45(1-3):348–358.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (2017a). “Evaluation of fully implicit Runge-Kutta schemes for unsteady flow calculations.” Journal of Scientific Computing 73(2):819–852.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. (2017b). “Origins and further development of the Jameson-Schmidt-Turkel scheme.” AIAA Journal 55(5):1487–1510.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Alonso, J. J. (1996). “Automatic aerodynamic optimization on distributed memory architectures.” AIAA paper 96-0409, AIAA 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Baker, T. J. (1983). “Solution of the Euler equations for complex configurations.” Proceedings of the AIAA 6th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Denver, CO. pp. 293–302.Google Scholar

Jameson, A., Baker, T. J., & Weatherill, N. P. (1986). “Calculation of inviscid transonic flow over a complete aircraft.” AIAA paper 86-0103, AIAA 24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Caughey, D. A. (1977). “A finite volume method for transonic potential flow calculations.” In Proceedings of the AIAA 3rd Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, pp. 35–54, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Caughey, D. A. (2001). “How many steps are required to solve the Euler equations of steady, compressible flow: In search of a fast solution algorithm.” AIAA paper 2001-2673, AIAA 15th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Kim, S. (2003). “Reduction of the adjoint gradient formulas for aerodynamic shape optimization.” AIAA Journal 41(11):2114–2129.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Lax, P. D. (1986). “Conditions for the construction of multipoint total variation diminishing schemes.” Applied Numerical Mathematics 2:335–345.Google Scholar

Jameson, A., Martinelli, L., & Pierce, N. A. (1998). “Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations.” Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 10(1-4): 213–237.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Mavriplis, D. J. (1987). “Multigrid solution of the Euler equations on unstructured and adaptive grids.” In McCormick, S. (ed.), Multigrid Methods, Theory, Applications and Supercomputing. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 110, pp. 413–430.Google Scholar

Jameson, A., Pierce, N., & Martinelli, L. (1997). “Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 97-0101.Google Scholar

Jameson, A., Schmidt, W., & Turkel, E. (1981). “Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes.” AIAA paper 1981-1259, 14th AIAA Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Jameson, A. & Turkel, E. (1981). “Implicit schemes and LU decompositions.” Mathematics of Computation 37(156):385–397.Google Scholar

Jayaram, M. & Jameson, A. (1988). “Multigrid solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for flow over wings.” AIAA paper 88-0705, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Jiang, G-S. & Shu, C-W. (1996). “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes.” Journal of Computational Physics 126(1):202–228.Google Scholar

Jothiprasad, G., Mavriplis, D. J., & Caughey, D. A. (2003). “Higher-order time integration schemes for the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes.” Journal of Computational Physics 191(2):542–566.Google Scholar

Katz, A. & Jameson, A. (2009). “Multicloud: Multigrid convergence with a meshless operator.” Journal of Computational Physics 228(14):5237–5250.Google Scholar

Ketcheson, D. I., Macdonald, C. B., & Gottlieb, S. (2009). “Optimal implicit strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods.” Applied Numerical Mathematics 59(2):373–392.Google Scholar

Kinmark, I. P. E. (1984). “One step integration methods with large stability limits for hyperbolic partial differential equations.” In Vichnevetsky, R. & Stepleman, R. S. (eds.), Advances in Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. V, pp. 345–349, IMACS.Google Scholar

Knoll, D. A. & Keyes, D. E. (2004). “Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: A survey of approaches and applications.” Journal of Computational Physics 193(2):357–397.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. (1941a). “The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds’ numbers.” In Doklady Akademiia Nauk SSSR, vol. 30, pp. 301–305.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. (1941b). “The logarithmically normal law of distribution of dimensions of particles when broken into small parts.” In Doklady Akademiia Nauk SSSR, vol. 30, pp. 301–305.Google Scholar

Kopriva, D. A. & Kolias, J. H. (1996). “A conservative staggered-grid Chebyshev multidomain method for compressible flows.” Journal of Computational Physics 125(1):244–261.Google Scholar

Kreiss, H-O. (1968). “Stability theory of difference approximations for mixed initial boundary value problems. I.” Mathematics of Computation 22(119):703–714.Google Scholar

Kreiss, H-O. & Oliger, J. (1973). Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems. Global Atmospheric Research Programme (Publication Series No. 10).Google Scholar

Kroll, N. & Fassbender, J. K. (2006). MEGAFLOW - Numerical Flow Simulation for Aircraft Design: Results of the second phase of the German CFD initiative MEGAFLOW, presented during its closing symposium at DLR, Braunschweig, Germany, December 10 and 11, 2002. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. Springer.Google Scholar

Kuya, Y., Totani, K., & Kawai, S. (2018). “Kinetic energy and entropy preserving schemes for compressible flows by split convective forms.” Journal of Computational Physics 375: 823–853.Google Scholar

Lallemand, M. H. & Dervieux, A. (1987). “A multigrid finite-element method for solving the two-dimensional Euler equations.” In McCormick, S. F. (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Copper Mountain Conference on Multigrid Methods, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, pp. 337–363, Copper Mountain.Google Scholar

Lamb, H. & Caflisch, R. (1993). Hydrodynamics. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lambert, J. D. (1991). Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Landsberg, A. M., Boris, J. P., Sandberg, W., & Young, T. R. (1993). “Naval ship superstructure design: Complex three-dimensional flows using an efficient, parallel method.” High Performance Computing 1993: Grand Challenges in Computer Simulation.Google Scholar

Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J., & Rodi, W. (1975). “Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 68(03):537–566.Google Scholar

Lax, P. D. & Richtmyer, R. D. (1956). “Survey of the stability of linear finite difference equations.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 9(2):267–293.Google Scholar

Lax, P. D. & Wendroff, B. (1960). “Systems of conservation laws.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:217–237.Google Scholar

Lele, S. K. (1992). “Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution.” Journal of Computational Physics 103(1):16–42.Google Scholar

Leonard, A. (1974). “Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows.” In Turbulent Diffusion in Environmental Pollution, vol. 1, pp. 237–248.Google Scholar

Leschziner, M. A. (2003). Turbulence Modeling for Aeronautical Flows. VKI Lecture Series, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.Google Scholar

Liepmann, H. W. & Roshko, A. (1957). Elements of Gas Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Lighthill, M. J. (1945). “A new method of two dimensional aerodynamic design.” Rand M 1111, Aeronautical Research Council.Google Scholar

Lilly, D. K. (1968). “Models of cloud-topped mixed layers under a strong inversion.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 94(401):292–309.Google Scholar

Lions, J. L. (1971). Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag. Translated by Mitter, S. K..Google Scholar

Liou, M-S. (1996). “A Sequel to AUSM: AUSM+.” Journal of Computational Physics 129(2):364–382.Google Scholar

Liou, M-S. (2006). “A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM-up for all speeds.” Journal of Computational Physics 214(1):137–170.Google Scholar

Liou, M-S. (2011). “Open problems in numerical fluxes: Proposed resolutions.” AIAA paper 3055, AIAA 20th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Liou, M-S. (2012). “Unresolved problems by shock capturing: Taming the overheating problem.” 7th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics pp. 2012–2203.Google Scholar

Liou, M-S. & Steffen, C. J. (1993). “A New flux splitting scheme.” Journal of Computational Physics 107:23–39.Google Scholar

Liu, F. & Jameson, A. (1992). “Multigrid Navier-Stokes calculations for three-dimensional cascades.” AIAA paper 92-0190, AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Liu, X-D., Osher, S., & Chan, T. (1994). “Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes.” Journal of Computational Physics 115(1):200–212.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Vinokur, M., & Wang, Z. J. (2006). “Spectral difference method for unstructured grids I: basic formulation.” Journal of Computational Physics 216(2):780–801.Google Scholar

Löhner, R. (2008). Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques: An Introduction Based on Finite Element Methods. Wiley.Google Scholar

Löhner, R., Morgan, K., Peraire, J., & Vahdati, M. (1987). “Finite element flux-corrected transport (FEM-FCT) for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 7(10):1093–1109.Google Scholar

Löhner, R. & Parikh, P. (1988). “Generation of three-dimensional grids by the advancing front method.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 8(10):1135–1149.Google Scholar

Lozano, C. (2012). “Adjoint viscous sensitivity derivatives with a reduced gradient formulation.” AIAA Journal 50(1):203–214.Google Scholar

Lozano, C. (2019). “Watch your adjoints! Lack of mesh convergence in inviscid adjoint solutions.” AIAA Journal 57(9):3991–4006.Google Scholar

Lytton, C. C. (1987). “Solution of the Euler equations for transonic flow over a lifting aerofoil-the Bernoulli formulation (Roe/Lytton method).” Journal of Computational Physics 73(2):395–431.Google Scholar

MacCormack, R. W. (1969). “The effect of viscosity in hyper-velocity impact cratering.” AIAA paper 69-354.Google Scholar

MacCormack, R. W. (1985). “Current status of numerical solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations.” AIAA paper 85-0032, AIAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

MacCormack, R. W. (1997). “A new implicit algorithm for fluid flow.” AIAA paper 97-2100, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO.Google Scholar

MacCormack, R. W. & Paullay, A. J. (1972). “Computational efficiency achieved by time splitting of finite difference operators.” AIAA paper 72-154, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting.Google Scholar

Mader, C. A., Kenway, G. K. W., Yildirim, A., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2020). “ADflow: An open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for aerodynamic and multidisciplinary optimization.” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Martinelli, L. (1987). Calculations of Viscous Flows with a Multigrid Method. Ph.D. thesis. Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar

Martinelli, L. & Jameson, A. (1988). “Validation of a multigrid method for the Reynolds-averaged equations.” AIAA paper 88-0414, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Martinelli, L., Jameson, A., & Malfa, E. (1992). “Numerical simulation of three-dimensional vortex flows over delta wing configurations.” In Napolitano, M. & Solbetta, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Confrence on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, pp. 534–538, Rome. Springer Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Mattsson, K. (2003). “Boundary procedures for summation-by-parts operators.” Journal of Scientific Computing 18(1):133–153.Google Scholar

Mavriplis, D. J. (2019). Progress in CFD Discretizations, Algorithms and Solvers for Aerodynamic Flows. AIAA paper 2019-2944, AIAA Aviation Forum, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar

Mavriplis, D. J. & Jameson, A. (1990). “Multigrid solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on triangular meshes.” AIAA Journal 28(8):1415–1425.Google Scholar

Mavriplis, D. J. & Long, M. (2014). “NSU3D results for the Fourth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop.” Journal of Aircraft 51(4):1161–1171.Google Scholar

Mavriplis, D. J. & Martinelli, L. (1991). “Multigrid solution of compressible turbulent flow on unstructured meshes using a two-equation model.” AIAA paper 91-0237, AIAA 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Mavriplis, D. J. & Venkatakrishnan, V. (1996). “A 3D agglomeration multigrid solver for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes.” International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids 23:1–18.Google Scholar

May, G. & Jameson, A. (2005). “Unstructured algorithms for inviscid and viscous flows embedded in a unified solver architecture, Flo3xx.” AIAA paper 2005-0318, AIAA 43rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

McMullen, M. S. (2003). The application of non-linear frequency domain methods to the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

McMullen, M. S., Jameson, A., & Alonso, J. J. (2002). “Application of a non-linear frequency domain solver to the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 2002-0120, AIAA 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Meijerink, J. A. & van der Vorst, H. A. (1977). “An iterative solution method for linear systems of which the coefficient matrix is a symmetric M -matrix.” Mathematics of Computation 31(137):148–162.Google Scholar

Melson, N. D., Sanetrik, M. D., & Atkins, H. L. (1993). “Time-accurate Navier-Stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Copper Mountain Conference on Multigrid Methods, Copper Mountain.Google Scholar

Melton, J. E., Pandya, S. A., & Steger, J. L. (1993). “3D Euler flow solutions using unstructured cartesian and prismatic grids.” AIAA paper 93-0331, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Millikan, C. B. (1938). “A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes.” In Proc. 5th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, vol. 386.Google Scholar

Morawetz, C. S. (1956). “On the non-existence of continuous transonic flows past profiles I.” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 9(1):45–68.Google Scholar

Mulder, W. A. (1989). “A new multigrid approach to convection problems.” Journal of Computational Physics 83:303–323.Google Scholar

Mulder, W. A. (1992). “A high-resolution Euler solver based on multigrid, semi-coarsening, and defect correction.” Journal of Computational Physics 100:91–104.Google Scholar

Murman, E. M. (1974). “Analysis of embedded shock waves calculated by relaxation methods.” AIAA Journal 12:626–633.Google Scholar

Murman, E. M. & Cole, J. D. (1971). “Calculation of plane steady transonic flows.” AIAA Journal 9:114–121.Google Scholar

Ni, R. H. (1982). “A multiple grid scheme for solving the Euler equations.” AIAA Journal 20:1565–1571.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, R. A. (1975). “On multiple grid and related techniques for solving discrete elliptic systems.” Journal of Computational Physics 19(4):418–431.Google Scholar

Oliger, J. & Sundstrom, A. (1978). “Theoretical and practical aspects of some initial boundary value problems in fluid dynamics.” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 35(3):419–446.Google Scholar

Orszag, S. A. & Israeli, M. (1974). “Numerical simulation of viscous incompressible flows.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 6(1):281–318.Google Scholar

Osher, S. (1984). “Riemann solvers, the entropy condition, and difference approximations.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 121:217–235.Google Scholar

Ou, K., Liang, C., & Jameson, A. (2010). “A high-order spectral difference method for the Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured moving deformable grids.” AIAA paper 2010-541, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Ou, K., Liang, C., Premasuthan, S., & Jameson, A. (2009). “High-order spectral difference simulation of laminar compressible flow over two counter-rotating cylinders.” AIAA paper 2009-3956, AIAA 27th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Parthasarathy, V., Kallinderis, Y., & Nakajima, K. (1995). “A hybrid adaptation method and directional viscous multigrid with prismatic-tetrahedral meshes.” AIAA paper 95-0670, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Patankar, S. V. & Spalding, D. B. (1972). “A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 15(10):1787–1806.Google Scholar

Peraire, J., Peiro, J., Formaggia, L., Morgan, K., & Zienkiewicz, O. C. (1988). “Finite element Euler computations in three dimensions.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 26(10):2135–2159.Google Scholar

Peraire, J., Peirö, J., & Morgan, K. (1992). “A 3D finite-element multigrid solver for the Euler equations.” AIAA paper 92-0449, AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Conference, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Peraire, J. & Persson, P-O. (2008). “The Compact Discontinuous Galerkin (CDG) method for elliptic problems.” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 30(4):1806–1824.Google Scholar

Persson, P-O., Willis, D. J, & Peraire, J. (2010). “The numerical simulation of flapping wings at low Reynolds numbers.” AIAA paper 2010-724, AIAA 48th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Pierce, N. A. & Giles, M. B. (1997). “Preconditioning compressible flow calculations on stretched meshes.” Journal of Computational Physics 136:425–445.Google Scholar

Pierce, N. A., Giles, M. B., Jameson, A., & Martinelli, L. (1997). “Accelerating three-dimensional Navier-Stokes calculations.” AIAA paper 97-1953, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass, CO.Google Scholar

Pironneau, O. (1984). Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Pope, S. B. (2000). Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, M. J. D. (1981). Approximation Theory and Methods. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prandtl, L. (1904). “Über flüssigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner reibung (On fluid motion with very small friction).” In Proceedings of 3rd International Mathematics Congress, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Prandtl, L. (1925). “Bericht über untersuchungen zur ausgebildeten turbulenz.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 5(2):136–139.Google Scholar

Prandtl, L. & Tietjens, O. G. (1957). Applied Hydro and Aeromechanics, vol. 1. Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Premasuthan, S., Liang, C., Jameson, A., & Wang, Z. J. (2009). “p-multigrid spectral difference method for viscous compressible flow using 2D quadrilateral meshes.” AIAA paper 2009-950, AIAA 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Pueyo, A. & Zingg, D. W. (1998). “Efficient Newton-Krylov solver for aerodynamic computations.” AIAA Journal 36(11):1991–1997.Google Scholar

Pulliam, T. H. (2011). “High order accurate finite-difference methods: As seen in OVERFLOW.” AIAA paper 2011-3851, AIAA 20th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Pulliam, T. H. & Steger, J. L. (1985). “Recent improvements in efficiency, accuracy and convergence for implicit approximate factorization algorithms.” AIAA paper 85-0360, AIAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Quirk, J. J. (1994). “A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 18:555–574.Google Scholar

Radespiel, R., Rossow, C., & Swanson, R. C. (1989). “An efficient cell-vertex multigrid scheme for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations.” In Proceedings of the AIAA 9th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, pp. 249–260, Buffalo, NY. AIAA paper 89-1953-CP.Google Scholar

Ray, D. & Chandrashekar, P. (2013). “Entropy stable schems for compressible Euler equations.” International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, Series B 4(4):335–352.Google Scholar

Reed, W. H. & Hill, T. R. (1973). “Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation.” Los Alamos Report LA-UR-73-479.Google Scholar

Reuther, J., Alonso, J. J., Vassberg, J. C., Jameson, A., & Martinelli, L. (1997). “An efficient multiblock method for aerodynamic analysis and design on distributed memory systems.” AIAA paper 97-1893, AIAA 13th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference.Google Scholar

Reuther, J. J., Jameson, A., Alonso, J. J., Rimllnger, M. J., & Saunders, D. (1999). “Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using an adjoint formulation and parallel computers, part 2.” Journal ofAircraft 36(1):61–74.Google Scholar

Richardson, L. F. (1911). “The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 210:307–357.Google Scholar

Richardson, L. F. (1922). Weather Prediction by Numerical Process. Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Richtmyer, R. D. & Morton, K. W. (1994). Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems. Krieger Publishing Co., 2nd edn.Google Scholar

Rieger, H. & Jameson, A. (1988). “Solution of steady three-dimensional compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations by and implicit LU scheme.” AIAA paper 88-0619, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Rizzi, A. & Viviand, H. (1981). “Numerical methods for the computation of inviscid transonic flows with shock waves.” In Proceedings of the GAMM workshop, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Roberts, T. W. (1990). “The behavior of flux difference splitting schemes near slowly moving shock waves.” Journal of Computational Physics 90(1):141–160.Google Scholar

Roe, P. L. (1981). “Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes.” Journal of Computational Physics 43(2):357–372.Google Scholar

Rossow, C-C. (2007). “Efficient computation of compressible and incompressible flows.” Journal of Computational Physics 220(2):879–899.Google Scholar

Rubbert, P. E. (1998). “The Boeing airplanes that have benefited from Antony Jameson’s CFD technology.” In Caughey, D. A. & Hafez, M. M. (eds.), Frontiers of Computational Fluid Dynamics 1998. World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated.Google Scholar

Rubbert, P. E. & Saaris, G. R. (1968). “A general three-dimensional potential flow method applied to V/STOL aerodynamics.” SAE paper 680304.Google Scholar

Rusanov, V. Vasil’evich (1961). “Calculation of interaction of non-steady shock waves with obstacles.” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics pp. 267–279.Google Scholar

Ruuth, S. J. & Spiteri, R. J. (2002). “Two barriers on strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods.” Journal of Scientific Computing 17(1-4):211–220.Google Scholar

Saad, Y. & Schultz, M. H. (1986). “GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems.” SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 7(3):856–869.Google Scholar

Sagaut, P. (2002). Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer.Google Scholar

Samant, S. S., Bussoletti, J. E., Johnson, F. T., Burkhart, R. H., Everson, B. L., Melvin, R. G., Young, D. P., Erickson, L. L., & Madson, M. D. (1987). “TRANAIR: A computer code for transonic analyses of arbitrary configurations.” AIAA paper 87-0034.Google Scholar

Sawada, K. & Takanashi, S. (1987). “A numerical investigation on wing/nacelle interferences of USB configuration.” AIAA paper 87-0455, AIAA 25th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Schlichting, H. (1933). “Laminare strahlausbreitung.” ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 13(4):260–263.Google Scholar

Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. (1999). Boundary Layer Theory. Springer.Google Scholar

Sheshadri, A. & Jameson, A. (2016). “On the stability of the flux reconstruction schemes on quadrilateral elements for the linear advection equation.” Journal of Scientific Computing 67(2):769–790.Google Scholar

Shu, C-W. & Osher, S. (1988). “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shockcapturing schemes.” Journal of Computational Physics 77:439–471.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, J. (1963). “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment.” Monthly Weather Review 91(3):99–164.Google Scholar

Smith, R. E. (1983). “Three-dimensional algebraic mesh generation.” In Proceedings of the AIAA 6th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Danvers, MA. AIAA paper 83-1904.Google Scholar

Smith, W. A. & Weiss, J. M. (1995). “Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows.” AIAA Journal 33(11):2050–2057.Google Scholar

Sod, G. A. (1978). “A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws.” Journal of Computational Physics 27(1):1–31.Google Scholar

Sorenson, R. L. (1986). “Elliptic generation of compressible three-dimensional grids about realistic aircraft.” In Hauser, J. & Taylor, C. (eds.), International Conference on Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Landshut.Google Scholar

Sorenson, R. L. (1988). “Three-dimensional elliptic grid generation for an F-16.” In Steger, J. L. & Thompson, J. F. (eds.), Three-Dimensional Grid Generation for Complex Configurations: Recent Progress. AGARDograph.Google Scholar

South, J. C. & Brandt, A. (1976). “Application of a multi-level grid method to transonic flow calculations.” In Adamson, T. C. & Platzer, M. F. (eds.), Proc. of Workshop on Transonic Flow Problems in Turbomachinery, pp. 180–206. Hemisphere, 1977.Google Scholar

Southwell, R. V. (1946). Relaxation Methods in Theoretical Physics. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Spekreijse, S. P. (1987). “Multigrid solution of monotone second-order discretizations of hyperbolic conservation laws.” Mathematics of Computation 49:135–155.Google Scholar

Spiteri, R. J. & Ruuth, S. J. (2002). “A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 40(2):469–491.Google Scholar

Steger, J. L. & Chaussee, D. S. (1980). “Generation of body-fitted coordinates using hyperbolic partial differential equations.” SIAM Journal on Scientific & Statistical Computing 1: 431–437.Google Scholar

Steger, J. L. & Warming, R. F. (1981). “Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gas dynamic equations with applications to finite difference methods.” Journal of Computational Physics 40:263–293.Google Scholar

Subbareddy, P. K. & Candler, G. V. (2009). “A fully discrete, kinetic energy consistent finite-volume scheme for compressible flows.” Journal of Computational Physics 228(5): 1347–1364.Google Scholar

Swanson, R. C., Turkel, E., & Rossow, C-C. (2007). “Convergence acceleration of Runge-Kutta schemes for solving the Navier-Stokes equations.” Journal of Computational Physics 224(1):365–388.Google Scholar

Ta’asan, S., Kuruvila, G., & Salas, M. D. (1992). “Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot.” AIAA paper 92-005, AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Tatsumi, S., Martinelli, L., & Jameson, A. (1995). “A new high resolution scheme for compressible viscous flows with shocks.” AIAA paper 95-0466, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Theodorsen, T. (1931). “Theory of wing sections of arbitary shape.” NACA TR-411.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. F., Thames, F. C., & Mastin, C. W. (1974). “Automatic numerical generation of body-fitted curvilinear coordinate system for field containing any number of arbitrary twodimensional bodies.” Journal of Computational Physics 15:299–319.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. F., Warsi, Z. U. A., & Mastin, C. W. (1982). “Boundary-fitted coordinate systems for numerical solution of partial differential equations: A review.” Journal of Computational Physics 47:1–108.Google Scholar

Toro, E. F. (2009). Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. Springer.Google Scholar

Toro, E. F., Spruce, M., & Speares, W. (1994). “Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver.” Shock Waves 4(1):25–34.Google Scholar

Turkel, E. (1987). “Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed equations.” Journal of Computational Physics 72:277–298.Google Scholar

Turner, M. J., Clough, R. W., Martin, H. C., & Topp, L. J. (1956). “Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structures.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 23(6):805–823.Google Scholar

Van, E. R. Driest (2012). “On turbulent flow near a wall.” Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences (Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences) 23(11).Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1964). Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1973). “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme I. The quest of monotonicity.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, pp. 163–168. Springer.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1974). “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme.” Journal of Computational Physics 14:361–370.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1977a). “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme III. Upstreamcentered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow.” Journal of Computational Physics 23(3):263–275.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1977b). “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection.” Journal of Computational Physics 23(3):276–299.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M. (1979). “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method.” Journal of Computational Physics 32(1):101–136.Google Scholar

Van Dyke, M., Lee, W. T., & Roe, P. L. (1991). “Characteristic time stepping or local preconditioning of the Euler equations.” AIAA paper 91-1552, AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Varga, R. S. (2000). “Alternating-direction implicit iterative methods.” In Matrix Iterative Analysis, pp. 235–274. Springer.Google Scholar

Vassberg, J. C. (1997). “A fast surface-panel method capable of solving million-element problems.” AIAA paper 1997-0168, AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Vassberg, J. C. & Jameson, A. (2010). “In pursuit of grid convergence for two-dimensional Euler solutions.” Journal of Aircraft 47(4):1152–1166.Google Scholar

Venkatakrishnan, V. (1988). “Newton solution of inviscid and viscous problems.” AIAA paper 88-0413, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Venkatakrishnan, V. (1996). “A perspective on unstructured grid flow solvers.” AIAA Journal 34:533–547.Google Scholar

Venkatakrishnan, V. & Mavriplis, D. J. (1996). “Implicit method for the computation of unsteady flows on unstructured grids.” Journal of Computational Physics 127:380–397.Google Scholar

Veuillot, J. P. & Viviand, H. (1979). “Pseudo-unsteady method for the computation of transonic potential flows.” AIAA Journal 17:691–692.Google Scholar

Vijayasundaram, G (1986). “Transonic flow simulations using an upstream centered scheme of Godunov in finite elements.” Journal of Computational Physics 63(2):416–433.Google Scholar

Vincent, P. E., Castonguay, P., & Jameson, A. (2011). “A new class of high-order energy stable flux reconstruction schemes.” Journal of Scientific Computing 47(1):50–72.Google Scholar

Vincent, P. E. & Jameson, A. (2011). “Facilitating the adoption of unstructured high-order methods amongst a wider community of fluid dynamicists.” Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena 6(3):97–140.Google Scholar

Von Kármán, T. (1930). “Mechanische änlichkeit und turbulenz.” Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1930: 58–76.Google Scholar

Voronoi, G. (1908). “Nouvelles applications des parametres continus a la theorie des formes quadratiques. Deuxieme memoire: Recherches sur les parallelloedres primitifs.” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 134:198–287.Google Scholar

Wachspress, E. L. (1963). “Extended application of alternating direction implicit iteration model problem theory.” Journal of the Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics 11(4): 994–1016.Google Scholar

Wang, Z. J. (2002). “Spectral (finite) volume method for conservation laws on unstructured grids. basic formulation: Basic formulation.” Journal of Computational Physics 178(1):210–251.Google Scholar

Wang, Z. J. (2007). “High-order methods for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured grids.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43(1):1–41.Google Scholar

Wang, Z. J. & Gao, H. (2009). “A unifying lifting collocation penalty formulation including the discontinuous Galerkin, spectral volume/difference methods for conservation laws on mixed grids.” Journal of Computational Physics 228(21):8161–8186.Google Scholar

Warming, R. F., Beam, R. M., & Hyett, B. J. (1975). “Diagonalization and simultaneous symmetrization of the gas-dynamic matrices.” Mathematics of Computation 29(132):1037–1045.Google Scholar

Weatherill, N. P. & Forsey, C. A. (1985). “Grid generation and flow calculations for aircraft geometries.” Journal of Aircraft 22:855–860.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, R. T. (1956). “A study of the zero lift drag-rise characteristics of wing-body combinations near the speed of sound.” NACA Report TR 1273.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, R. T. (1974). “Review of NASA supercritical airfoils.” In 9th ICAS Congress, no. 74-10, Haifa.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, R. T. (1976). “A design approach and selected wind-tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets.” NASA Technical Note D-8260.Google Scholar

Wilcox, D. C. (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD, vol. 3. DCW industries La Cañada, CA.Google Scholar

Williams, D. M., Castonguay, P., Vincent, P. E., & Jameson, A. (2013). “Energy stable flux reconstruction schemes for advection-diffusion problems on triangles.” Journal of Computational Physics 250:53–76.Google Scholar

Williams, D. M. & Jameson, A. (2014). “Energy stable flux reconstruction schemes for advection-diffusion problems on tetrahedra.” Journal of Scientific Computing 59:721–759.Google Scholar

Witherden, F. D. & Jameson, A. (2018). “On the spectrum of the Steger-Warming flux-vector splitting scheme.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 87(12):601–606.Google Scholar

Witherden, F. D., Jameson, A., & Zingg, D. W. (2017). “Chapter 11 - The design of steady state schemes for computational aerodynamics.” In Abgrall, R. & Shu, C-W. (eds.), Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, vol. 18 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, pp. 303–349. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Yee, H. C. (1985). “On symmetric and upwind TVD schemes.” In Proceedings of the 6th GAMM Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Yoon, S. & Jameson, A. (1987). “Lower-upper symmetric-Gauss-Seidel method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.” AIAA paper 87-0600, AIAA 25th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.Google Scholar

Young, D. M. (2003). Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems. Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Zienkiewicz, O. C. (1995). “Origins, milestones and directions of the finite element method-A personal view.” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2(1):1–48.Google Scholar

Zienkiewicz, O. C. (2004). “The birth of the finite element method and of computational mechanics.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 60(1):3–10.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive