Book contents
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Climate Ethics, Affirmative Action, and Unjust Enrichment
- 2 Historical Responsibility and Climate Change
- 3 Historical Emissions
- 4 How Legal Systems Deal with Issues of Responsibility for Past Harmful Behavior
- 5 Asking Beneficiaries to Pay for Past Pollution
- 6 Benefiting from Unjust Acts and Benefiting from Injustice
- 7 A Luck-Based Moral Defense of Grandfathering
- 8 In Defense of Emissions Egalitarianism?
- 9 In the Name of Political Possibility
- 10 Right to Development and Historical Emissions
- Index
- References
Introduction
On the Significance of Historical Emissions for Climate Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Climate Ethics, Affirmative Action, and Unjust Enrichment
- 2 Historical Responsibility and Climate Change
- 3 Historical Emissions
- 4 How Legal Systems Deal with Issues of Responsibility for Past Harmful Behavior
- 5 Asking Beneficiaries to Pay for Past Pollution
- 6 Benefiting from Unjust Acts and Benefiting from Injustice
- 7 A Luck-Based Moral Defense of Grandfathering
- 8 In Defense of Emissions Egalitarianism?
- 9 In the Name of Political Possibility
- 10 Right to Development and Historical Emissions
- Index
- References
Summary
We discuss the main underlying issues of the significance of historical emissions and their consequences: according to which principle current agents are responsible for them and whether past emitters' supposed ignorance of the long-term global consequences matters for the attribution of such responsibilities. We also discuss how taking into account historical emissions should inform policy choices.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Justice and Historical Emissions , pp. 1 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Baumert, K., Herzog, T., and Pershing, J. (2005). Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2008). Carbon Justice? The Case against a Universal Right to Equal Carbon Emissions. In Seeking Environmental Justice, ed. Wilks, S.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 239–57.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2011). Global Climate Justice, Historic Emissions, and Excusable Ignorance. Monist, 94(3), 391–411.Google Scholar
Bovens, L. (2011). A Lockean Defense of Grandfathering Emission Rights. In The Ethics of Global Climate Change, ed. Arnold, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–44.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2010). Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2009). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Farrelly, C. (2007). Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation. Political Studies, 55(4), 844–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2013). The Feasibility Constraint on the Concept of Justice. Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, P. (2012). Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical Emissions and Free-Riding. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 11(1), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, A. A. (2007). Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies, 136(1), 59–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C. (2013). What Is Grandfathering? Environmental Politics, 22, 410–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C. (2014). Moderate Emissions Grandfathering. Environmental Values, 23, 571–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolstad, C., Urama, K., Broome, J., Bruvoll, A., Fullerton, D., Gollier, C., Hahnemann, W. M., Hassan, R., Jotzo, F., Khan, M. R., Meyer, L., Mundaca, L., Olvera, C. (2015). Social, Economic, and Ethical Concepts and Methods. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Edenhofer, O. et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, 207–282.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (2003). Who Can Be Wronged? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R., and Silver, D. (2004). The Legacy of Injustice: Wronging the Future, Responsibility for the Past. In Justice in Time: Responding to Historical Injustice, ed. Meyer, L. H.. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 145–58.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (1997). More than They Have a Right to: Future People and Our Future Oriented Projects. In Contingent Future Persons: On the Ethics of Deciding Who Will Live, or Not, in the Future, ed. Fotion, N. and Heller, J. C.. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic, pp. 137–56.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2004). Compensating Wrongless Historical Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 11(1), 22–37.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (ed.) (2004). Justice in Time: Responding to Historical Injustice. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Meyer, L., (2006). Reparations and Symbolic Restitution. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(3), 406–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. (2013). Why Historical Emissions Should Count. Chicago Journal of International Law, 13(2), 598–614.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. (2015). Intergenerational Justice. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/justice-intergenerational/.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. and Roser, D. (2006). Distributive Justice and Climate Change: The Allocation of Emission Rights. Analyse & Kritik 28(2), 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Roser, D. (2010). Climate Justice and Historical Emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 229–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2009). Introduction: Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law: Three Perspectives on the Debate. In Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law, ed. Meyer, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2011). Individual Expectations and Climate Change. Analyse & Kritik, 32(2), 449–71.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. and Sanklecha, P. (2014). How Legitimate Expectations Matter in Climate Justice, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13(3), 369–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2008). Political Philosophy for Earthlings. In Political Theory: Methods and Approaches, ed. Leopold, D. and Stears, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1987). Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, 22, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E. (2006). Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1951). Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics. Philosophical Review, 60, 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G. (2004). Skepticism about Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, R. (2011). Climate Justice: A Question of Historic Responsibility? Journal of Global Ethics, 7, 261–78.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2006). What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? Journal of Philosophy, 103, 215–38.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory? Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, A. (2008). The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances. Social Theory and Practice, 34, 363–87.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654–64.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (2012). Identity and Obligation in a Transgenerational Polity. In Intergenerational Justice, ed. Gosseries, A. and Meyer, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by