Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:38:38.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I.3 - Dietary Reconstruction As Seen in Coprolites

from Part I - Determining What Our Ancestors Ate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Kenneth F. Kiple
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

The question of prehistoric dietary practices has become an important one. Coprolites (desiccated or mineralized feces) are a unique resource for analyzing prehistoric diet because their constituents are mainly the undigested or incompletely digested remains of food items that were actually eaten. Thus they contain direct evidence of dietary intake (Bryant 1974b, 1990; Spaulding 1974; Fry 1985; Scott 1987; Sobolik 1991a, 1994a, 1994b). In addition they can reveal important information on the health, nutrition, possible food preparation methods, and overall food economy and subsistence of a group of people (Sobolik 1991b; Reinhard and Bryant 1992).

Coprolites are mainly preserved in dry, arid environments or in the frozen arctic (Carbone and Keel 1985). Caves and enclosed areas are the best places for preserved samples and there are also samples associated with mummies. Unfortunately, conditions that help provide such samples are not observed in all archaeological sites.

Coprolite analysis is important in the determination of prehistoric diets for two significant reasons. First, the constituents of a coprolite are mainly the remains of intentionally eaten food items. This type of precise sample cannot be replicated as accurately from animal or plant debris recovered from archaeological sites. Second, coprolites tend to preserve small, fragile remains, mainly because of their compact nature, which tends to keep the constituents separated from the site matrix. These remains are typically recovered by normal coprolitic processing techniques, which involve screening with micron mesh screens rather than the larger screens used during archaeological excavations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, L. 1833–43. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles. 5 vols. Vol. 2. Soleure. Neuchatel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Alland, A. Jr. 1969. Ecology and adaptation to parasitic diseases. In Environmental and cultural behavior, ed. Vayada, A. P., Tucson.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1974a. Prehistoric diet in southwest Texas: The coprolite evidence. American Antiquity 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1974b. The role of coprolite analysis in archeology. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 45.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1975. Pollen as an indicator of prehistoric diets in Coahuila, Mexico. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 46.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1986. Prehistoric diet: A case for coprolite analysis. In Ancient Texans: Rock art and lifeways along the lower Pecos, ed. Shafer, Harry J.. Austin.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1987. Pollen grains: The tiniest clues in archaeology. Environment Southwest 519.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1990. Pollen: Nature’s fingerprints of plants. Yearbook of science and the future, Encyclopedia Britannica. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr., and Williams-Dean, Glenna. 1975. The coprolites of man. Scientific American 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, W. 1829. On the discovery of coprolites, or fossil faeces, in the Lias at Lyme Regis, and in other formations. Geological Society of London, Transactions 3.Google Scholar
Burlage, Henry M. 1968. Index of plants of Texas with reputed medicinal and poisonous properties. Austin, Tex.Google Scholar
Callen, Eric O., and Cameron, T. W. M.. 1960. A prehistoric diet revealed in coprolites. The New Scientist 8.Google Scholar
Carbone, Victor A., and Keel, B. C.. 1985. Preservation of plant and animal remains. In The analysis of prehistoric diets, ed. Gilbert, R. I. and Mielke, J. H.. New York.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Aidan. 1967. Infectious diseases: Their evolution and eradication. Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
Cordell, Linda S. 1977. Late Anasazi farming and hunting strategies: One example of a problem in congruence. American Antiquity 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Owen K., Agenbroad, Larry, Martin, Paul S., and Mead, J. I.. 1984. The Pleistocene dung blanket of Bechan Cave, Utah. In Contributions in quaternary vertebrate paleontology: A volume in memorial to John E. Guilday, ed. Genoways, H. H. and Dawson, M. R.. Pittsburgh, Pa.Google Scholar
DeKay, J. E. 1830. On the discovery of coprolites in North America. Philosophy Magazine 7.Google Scholar
Douglas, Charles L. 1969. Analysis of hairs in Lovelock Cave coprolites. In Archaeological and paleobiological investigations in Lovelock Cave, Nevada, ed. Napton, L. K.. Kroeber Anthropological Society Special Publication, 2.Google Scholar
Dunn, Frederick L. 1968. Epidemiological factors: Health and disease in hunter-gatherers. In Man the hunter, ed. Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I.. Chicago.Google Scholar
El-Najjar, M. 1976. Maize, malaria, and anemias in the New World. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 20.Google Scholar
Faegri, K., and Iversen, J.. 1964. Textbook of pollen analysis. New York.Google Scholar
Fenner, Frank. 1970. The effects of changing social organization on the infectious diseases of man. In The impact of civilization on the biology of man, ed. Boyden, S. V.. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1979. Paleoethnobotany in American archaeology. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, Vol. 2, ed. Schiffer, Michael B.. New York.Google Scholar
Fry, Gary F. 1985. Analysis of fecal material. In The analysis of prehistoric diets, ed. Gilbert, R. I. and Mielke, J. H.. New York.Google Scholar
Harshberger, J. W. 1896. The purpose of ethnobotany. American Antiquarian 17.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian. 1971. Subsistence and ecological adaptations of modern hunter/gatherers. In Omnivorous primates: Gathering and hunting in human evolution, ed. Harding, R. S. O. and Teleki, G.. New York.Google Scholar
Hevly, Richard H., Kelley, R. E., Anderson, G. A., and Olsen, S. J.. 1979. Comparative effects of climate change, cultural impact and volcanism in the paleoecology of Flagstaff, Arizona, A.D. 900–1300. In Volcanic activity and human history, ed. Sheets, Payson D. and Grayson, Donald K.. New York.Google Scholar
Hill, J., and Hevly, Richard H.. 1968. Pollen at Broken K Pueblo: Some new interpretations. American Antiquity 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, Richard G. 1983. Diet and medicinal plant usage of a late Archaic population from Culberson County, Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 54.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jesse D. 1957. Danger Cave. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 27. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Jones, Volney H. 1936. The vegetal remains of Newt Kash Hollow Shelter. University of Kentucky Reports in Archaeology and Ethnology 3.Google Scholar
Kirchoff, Paul. 1971. The hunting-gathering people of North Mexico. In The north Mexican frontier, ed. Hedrick, Basil C., Kelley, J. Charles, and Riley, Carroll L.. Carbondale, Ill.Google Scholar
Kliks, Michael. 1983. Paleoparasitology: On the origins and impact of human-helminth relationships. In Human ecology and infectious diseases, ed. Croll, N. A. and Cross, J. H.. New York.Google Scholar
Kooyman, B., Newman, M. E., and Ceri, H.. 1992. Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudermilk, J. D., and Munz, P. A.. 1934. Plants in the dung of Nothrotherium from Gypsum Cave, Nevada. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 453.Google Scholar
Laudermilk, J. D., and Munz, P. A.. 1938. Plants in the dung of Nothrotherium from Rampart and Muav Cave, Arizona. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 487.Google Scholar
Loud, L. L., and Harrington, M. R.. 1929. Lovelock Cave. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee. 1982. Archaeofaunas and Subsistence Studies. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, Vol. 5, ed. Schiffer, Michael B.. Tucson, Ariz.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., and Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1974. Modern pollen spectra from the Columbia Basin, Washington. Northwest Science 48.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S. 1958. Preliminary archeological investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. American Philosophical Society Transactions, Vol. 44.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1822. The fossils of the South Downs; or illustrations of the geology of Sussex. London.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S., Sables, B. E., and Shutler, D. Jr. 1961. Rampart Cave coprolite and ecology of the Shasta Ground Sloth. American Journal of Science 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Paul S., and Sharrock, F. W.. 1964. Pollen analysis of prehistoric human feces: A new approach to ethnobotany. American Antiquity 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, William H. 1979. The human condition: An ecological and historical view. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Minnis, Paul E. 1989. Prehistoric diet in the northern Southwest: Macroplant remains from Four Corners feces. American Antiquity 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Daniel E. 1986. Medicinal plants of native America. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology Technical Reports No. 19. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1979. Medicinal plants of the mountain west. Santa Fe, N. Mex.Google Scholar
Munson, Patrick J., Parmalee, Paul W., and Yarnell, Richard A.. 1971. Subsistence ecology at Scoville, a terminal Middle Woodland village. American Antiquity 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napton, Lewis K., and Brunetti, O. A.. 1969. Paleo-ornithology of Lovelock Cave coprolites. In Archaeological and paleobiological investigations in Lovelock Cave, Nevada, ed. Napton, Lewis K.. Kroeber Anthropological Society Special Publication, 2.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. S. 1967. Human behavior in the transmission of parasitic diseases. In Behavioural aspects of parasite transmission, ed. Canning, E. U. and Wright, C. A.. London.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E., Yohe, R. M. II, Ceri, H., and Sutton, M. Q.. 1993. Immunological protein residue analysis of nonlithic archaeological materials. Journal of Archaeological Science 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niethammer, Carolyn. 1974. American Indian food and lore. New York.Google Scholar
Palkovich, A. M. 1984. Agriculture, marginal environments, and nutritional stress in the prehistoric southwest. In Paleopathology at the origins of agriculture, ed. Cohen, M. N. and Armelagos, G. J.. New York.Google Scholar
Parmalee, Paul W., Paloumpis, Andreas, and Wilson, Nancy. 1972. Animals utilized by Woodland peoples occupying the Apple Creek Site, Illinois. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations. Springfield.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Karl J., Brooks, R. H., Brooks, S., and Largent, Floyd B. Jr. 1989. Diet and environment determined from analysis of prehistoric coprolites from an archaeological site near Zape Chico, Durango, Mexico. Journal of Paleopathology Monograph 1.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Karl J., and Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. 1992. Coprolite analysis: A biological perspective on archaeology. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, Vol. 4, ed. Schiffer, Michael B.. Tucson, Ariz.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Karl J., Hamilton, Donny L., and Hevly, Richard H.. 1991. Use of pollen concentration in paleopharmacology: Coprolite evidence of medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnobiology 11.Google Scholar
Robert, E. 1832–33. Sur des coprolithes trouvés à Passy. Society of Geology France Bulletin 3.Google Scholar
Rose, Jerry C., Burnett, B. A., Nassaney, M. S., and Blaeuer, M. W.. 1984. Paleopathology and the origins of maize agriculture in the lower Mississippi Valley and Caddoan culture areas. In Paleopathology at the origins of agriculture, ed. Cohen, M. N. and Armelagos, G. J.. New York.Google Scholar
Scott, Linda. 1987. Pollen analysis of hyena coprolites and sediments from Equus Cave, Taung, southern Kalahari (South Africa). Quaternary Research, New York 28.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1975. Middle Mississippi exploitation of animal populations. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers No. 57. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., and Jones, F. W.. 1910. Archeological survey of Nubia 1907–1908. Cairo.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1988. The importance of pollen concentration values from coprolites: An analysis of southwest Texas samples. Palynology 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1990. A nutritional analysis of diet as revealed in prehistoric human coprolites. Texas Journal of Science 42.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1991b. The prehistoric diet and subsistence of the Lower Pecos region, as reflected in coprolites from Baker Cave, Val Verde County, Texas. Studies in Archaeology Series No. 7, Texas Archaeological Research Lab, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1993. Direct evidence for the importance of small animals to prehistoric diets: A review of coprolite studies. North American Archaeologist 14.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1994a. Introduction. In Paleonutrition: The diet and health of prehistoric Americans, ed. Sobolik, K. D.. Carbondale, Ill.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D. 1994b. Paleonutrition of the Lower Pecos region of the Chihuahuan Desert. In Paleonutrition: The diet and health of prehistoric Americans, ed. Sobolik, K. D.. Carbondale, Ill.Google Scholar
Sobolik, Kristin D., and Gerick, Deborah J.. 1992. Prehistoric medicinal plant usage: A case study from coprolites. Journal of Ethnobiology 12.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. S., Devender, Thomas R., Martin, Paul S., et al. 1980. Shasta ground sloth Nothrotheriops shastense (Hoffsteter) at Shelter Cave, New Mexico; environment, diet, and extinction. Quaternary Research, New York 14.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. F., and Dellinger, S. C.. 1936. Diet of the Bluff Dwellers of the Ozark Mountains and its skeletal effects. Annals of Internal Medicine 9.Google Scholar
Wales, S., Evans, J., and Leeds, A. R.. 1991. The survival of waxes in coprolites: The archaeological potential. In Archaeological sciences 1989: Proceedings of a conference on the application of scientific techniques to archaeology, Bradford, September 1989, ed. Budd, P., Chapman, B., Jackson, C., et al. Oxbow Monograph 9. Bradford, England.Google Scholar
WalkerPhillip, . 1985. Anemia among prehistoric Indians of the southwest. In Health and disease of the prehistoric southwest. Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers No. 34, ed. Merbs, C. F. and Miller, R. J.. Tempe.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S., and Baby, R. S.. 1957. The Adena people, no. 2. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Young, B. H. 1910. The prehistoric men of Kentucky. Filson Club Publications No. 25. Louisville, Ky.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×