Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:16:31.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Respectful involvement of children in medical decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Nuala Kenny
Affiliation:
Professor Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Jocelyn Downie
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Christine Harrison
Affiliation:
Professor University of Toronto, Canada
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

H is a bright, loving, 11-year-old child who has been treated for osteosarcoma. Her left arm has been amputated and she was given a course of chemotherapy. She has been cancer free for 18 months and is doing well in school. She is self-conscious about her prosthesis and sad because she had to give away her cat, Snowy, to decrease her risk of infection. Recent tests indicate that the cancer has recurred and metastasized to her lungs. Her family is devastated by this news but do not want to give up hope. However, even with aggressive treatment, H's chances for remission are less than 20%. H adamantly refuses further treatment. In the first round of treatment, she had initially acquiesced to the treatment but ultimately struggled violently when it was administered. She distrusts her healthcare providers and is angry with them and her parents. She protests, “You already made me give up Snowy and my arm. What more do you want?” Her parents insist that treatment must continue. At the request of her physician, a psychologist and psychiatrist conduct a capacity assessment. They agree that H is incapable of making treatment decisions; her understanding of death is immature and her anxiety level very high. Nursing staff are reluctant to impose treatment. In the past, H's struggling and the need to restrain her caused them serious concern.

What is respectful involvement of children in medical decisions?

Respectful involvement of children in medical decisions requires respect for parental authority and family context as well as careful attention to the communicative and developing decisional needs and abilities of the child.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitch, R., Freedman, J. L., Henry, K., and Brunschot, M. (1995). Children's capacity to agree to psychological research: knowledge of risks and benefits and voluntariness. Ethics and Behaviour 5: 25–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics (1995). Informed consent, parental permission and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 95: 314–17.Google Scholar
Baylis, F., Downie, J., and Kenny, N. P. (1999). Children and decisionmaking in health research. IRB: Rev Hum Subject Res 21: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulford, R. (1997). Children have rights too. BMJ 314: 1421–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Paediatric Society and Bioethics Committee (2004). Treatment decisions regarding infants, children and adolescents. Paediatr Child Health 9: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, AAP Policy, and American Academy of Pediatrics (2003). Consent for emergency medical services for children and adolescents. Pediatrics 111: 703–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, N. P. and Skinner, L. E. (2003). Skills for assessing the appropriate role for children in health decisions. In Pediatric Clinical Skills, 3rd edn, ed. Goldbloom, R.. New York: Saunders, pp. 349–59.Google Scholar
Miller, V. A., Drotor, D., and Kodish, E. (2004). Children's competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethics Behav 14: 255–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, H. L. and Nelson, J. L. (1995). The Patient in the Family: An Ethics of Medicine and Families. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rossi, W. C., Reynolds, W., and Nelson, R. M. (2003). Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research. Theor Med Bioethics 24: 131–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, C. (2003). Children and research participation: who makes what decisions. Health Law Rev 11: 20–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Various authors (2003). Am J Bioethics3: issue 4.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×