Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T07:56:53.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Predicables and categories

from III - The old logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

Aristotle, Porphyry, and the old logic

Prominent among the antecedents of medieval philosophy, particularly of logic and philosophy of language, are two logical works of Aristotle's. His De interpretatione and Categories, as transmitted by Boethius and coloured by Porphyry's introduction (Isagoge) to the Categories, endowed the logica vetus with a substantial inheritance of technical terms and the metaphysical puzzles that go with them. An explanation of this inheritance requires a brief excursion into the history of the terminology central to the Isagoge and the Categories.

The terminology of the Isagoge and the Categories

Aristotle developed two loosely linked doctrines regarding the structure of propositions; one is that of the predicables, the other that of the categories (or predicaments). Chapters 4, 5, and 8 of Book I of Aristotle's Topics contain an account of the predicables definition, property, genus, differentia, and accident. A definition is a phrase signifying a thing's essence. A property is a predicate not indicating a thing's essence but predicable convertibly of it since it belongs to that thing alone; e.g., the capacity for literacy belongs exclusively to man, so that anything that has that capacity is a man, and only a man has that capacity. A genus is predicated essentially of diverse sorts of things; e.g., animal of man, ox, horse, and so forth. A differentia in combination with the genus produces the definition, as when mortal rational is added to animal to produce the definition of man.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy
From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600
, pp. 128 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. (1963). Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretation. Translated, with notes. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
,Anonymous (1962–7b). Ars Meliduna in Rijk, 1962–7, II (1) (excerpts)Google Scholar
Anselm, Canterbury (1946a). De libertate arbitrii in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) Opera omnia, vol. 1, NelsonGoogle Scholar
Anselm, Canterbury (1946c). De casu diaboli in Schmitt, F. S. (ed.) Opera omnia, vol. I, NelsonGoogle Scholar
Bocheński, I. M. (1961). History of Formal Logic, tr. and ed. Thomas, Ivo, University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1968). The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1973). Analytical Philosophy of Action, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. R. (1977). ‘inopes verborum sunt latini: technical language and technical terms in the writings of st anselm and some commentaries of the mid-twelfth century’, archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 54:.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R. (1978). anselm and talking about god, clarendon pressGoogle Scholar
Fredborg, K. M. (1973). ‘the dependence of petrus helias' summa super priscianum on william of conches' glose super priscianum’, cimagl 11:.Google Scholar
Fredborg, K. M., Green-Pedersen, N.J., Nielsen, L., and Pinborg, Jan (1975). ‘the commentary on “priscianus maior” ascribed to robert kilwardby’, cimagl 15:.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Poitiers (1966). The Commentaries on Boethius by Gilbert of Poitiers, ed. HÄRing, Nikolaus M., Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, N.J. (1973). ‘On the Interpretation of Aristotle's Topics in the 13th Century’, CIMACL 9:.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, N.J. (1977a). ‘Discussions about the Status of the Loci Dialectici in Works from the Middle of the 13th Century,’ CIMACL 20:Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond Paul (1958). ‘Why “Grammaticus”?’, Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi, 28:Google Scholar
Henry, Desmond Paul (1964). The De grammatico of St Anselm: Theory of Paronymy (Publications in Mediaeval Studies, 18), University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Henry, Desmond Paul (1967). The Logic of Saint Anselm, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Henry, Desmond Paul (1972). Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, HutchinsonGoogle Scholar
Henry, Desmond Paul (1974). Commentary on De grammatico: The Historical-Logical Dimension of a Dialogue of St Anselm's (Synthese Historical Library, 8), ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Ghent (1974). ‘The absolute and the ordained powers of the pope’, ed. Marrone, John, Mediaeval Studies 36:Google Scholar
Hopkins, Jasper (1972). A Companion to the Study of St Anselm, University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Jasper (1976). Hermeneutical and textual problems in the complete treatises of St Anselm (vol. 4 in his St Anselm), Edwin MellinGoogle Scholar
Jolivet, Jean (1975) ‘Vues médiévales sur les paronymes’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 113:.Google Scholar
Kneale, William and Martha, (1962). The Development of Logic, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman (1967). ‘History of Semantics’ in Edwards, P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Philosophy, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Liebeschütz, Hans (1967). ‘Western Christian Thought from Boethius to Anselm’ in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1967). ‘Porphyry and lamblichus’ in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Later Creek and Early Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, L. (1976). ‘On the Doctrine of Logic and Language of Gilbert Porreta and his Followers’, CIMAGL 17:.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan (1972). Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter — Ein Überblick (Problemata, 10), Frommann-HolzboogGoogle Scholar
Pinborg, Jan (1973a). ‘Petrus de Alvernia on Porphyry’, CIMAGL 9:.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan (1974). ‘Zum Begriff der Intentio Secunda - Radulphus Brito, Hervaeus Natalis und Petrus Aureoli in Diskussion’, CIMAGL 13:.Google Scholar
Rijk, L. M., ed. (1956). Petrus Abaelardus: Dialectica, Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
Rijk, L. M. ed. (1962–7). Logica modernorum: A contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic. I: On the Twelfth Century Theories of Fallacy (1962); II, 1: The Origin and Early Development of the Theory of Supposition; II, 2: Texts and Indices (1967), Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1951). Ancient and Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe, G. BellGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. S. (1936). Ein neues unvollendetes Werk des hl. Anselm von Canterbury (BGPM XXXIII, 3), AschendorffGoogle Scholar
Southern, R. W. and Schmitt, F. S. (1969). Memorials of St Anselm, British AcademyGoogle Scholar
Twcedale, M. M. (1976). Abailard on Universals, North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. (1976). ‘Logical Form and Agency’, Philosophical Studies 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×