Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:04:21.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Belief, Knowledge, and Certainty

from IV - Epistemology and Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

Steven Nadler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
T. M. Rudavsky
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

De’ot harbeh yesh le-qol eḥad ve-eḥad mi-bnei- ’adam, ve-zo me-shunah mi-zo u-reḥokah mi-mena be-yoter. Mishneh Torah, Sefer ha-Madda, Hilkhot De’ot, 1 Multiple ‘opinions’ are possessed by each and every human being, and each one is as different from another as it is distant from it.

’Ad ’ei-matai ḥayav lilmod torah? ’Ad yom moto. Mishneh Torah, Sefer ha-Maddah, Hilkhot Talmud Torah, 1, 10 Until when is one obligated to study the Torah? Until death.

Gnothi se auton. The Delphic Oracle Know thyself.

Pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei. Aristotle, Metaphysics, 980a22. By nature, all human beings desire to know.

PROLEGOMENON

The plurality of Hebrew terms denoting knowledge, as well as the lack of a clear distinction between knowledge and belief, is rarely, if ever, reflected in translation. In fact, the same Hebrew term is sometimes translated as “knowledge,” at others, as “belief,” and at yet others as terms that the modern reader would not recognize as a species of either knowledge or belief. I begin this chapter with two citations from Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah, and two from the Greek philosophical tradition to focus on the problematic nature of “knowledge,” as well as caution against attempts to neatly fit ancient and medieval philosophical terms and concepts into what initially may appear to be their modern and contemporary equivalents. The two terms used by Maimonides in the first two epigraphs, de’ot and limud Torah, respectively, exemplify this difficulty. In particular, the term de’ot, (sing. de’ah) can denote opinion, knowledge, and even character.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy
From Antiquity through the Seventeenth Century
, pp. 451 - 480
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, Alexander (1987). “Maimonides on the Intellect and the Scope of Metaphysics,” in Altmann, A., Von der mittelalterlichen zur modernen Aufklärung. Tübingen: J.C. Mohr.Google Scholar
Averroes, (2001). The Book of the Decisive Treatise. (Kitāb fasl al-maqāl). Butterworth, Charles (trans.). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, Idit (2002). “The Power of Prejudice and the Force of Law: Spinoza’s Critique of Religion and Its Heirs,” Epoché. 7:.Google Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, Idit (2003). “Whose History? Spinoza’s Critique of Religion as an Other Modernity,” Idealistic Studies. 33:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs-Weinstein, Idit (2006). “Tensions Within and Between Maimonides’ and Gersonides’ Account of Prophecy,” in Hamesse and Weijers 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersonides, (1984). The Wars of the Lord, volume 1: Book One. Feldman, Seymour (trans.). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Kellner, Menachem (1977). “Maimonides and Gersonides on Mosaic Prophecy,” Speculum. 52:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachterman, David R. (1989). The Ethics of Geometry: A Genealogy of Modernity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1962). The Book of Knowledge. Moses Hyamson (trans.). Jerusalem: Boys Town Publishers.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. 2 vols., Pines, Shlomo (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1964). Dalālat al-Ḥāirīn. Munk, S. (ed.). Osnabruck: Otto Zeller.Google Scholar
Maimonides, (1975). Ethical Writings of Maimonides. Weiss, R.L. and Butterworth, C.E. (eds. and trans.). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Munk, Salomon (1859). Mélanges de philosophie juive et arabe. Paris: A. Franck.Google Scholar
Gaon, Saadia (1969b). Sefer ha-Nibḥar be-Emunot u-be-Decot, le-Rabenu Sa⼸adiah ben Yosef Fayummi. Qāfih, Yosef D. (ed. and trans.). Jerusalem: Yeshiva University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza. volume 1. Curley, Edwin (trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×