Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:05:09.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AA. VV., (1983) ∑YZHTH∑I∑ – Studi sull'epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante, 2 vols. (Naples).Google Scholar
Aalders, G. J. D. (1968) Die Theorie der gemischten Verfassung im Altertum (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Aalders, G. J. D. (1975) Political Thought in Hellenistic Times (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. (1963) Aristotle's ‘Categories’ and ‘De Interpretatione’, Aristotle, Clarendon Series (Oxford; repr. w. corr. 1966).Google Scholar
Ackroyd, P. R. (1970) ‘The Old Testament in the making’, in Ackroyd, & Evans, (1970) 67–113.Google Scholar
Ackroyd, P. R. & Evans, C. F., edd. (1970) The Cambridge History of the Bible, vol. I: From the Beginnings to Jerome (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, A., ed. (1990) Logica, mente e persona: Studi sulla filosofia antica (Florence).Google Scholar
Alberti, A. (1995) ‘The Epicurean theory of law and justice’, in Laks, & Schofield, (1995) 161–90.Google Scholar
Alfieri, V. E. (1936) Gli Atomisti — Frammenti e testimonianze (Bari).Google Scholar
Algra, K. A. (1988) ‘The early Stoics on the immobility and coherence of the cosmos’, Phronesis 33, 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. A. (1992) ‘“Place”, in context: on Theophrastus fr. 21 and 22 Wimmer’, in Fortenbaugh, et al. (1992) 141–65.Google Scholar
Algra, K. A. (1993) ‘Posidonius' conception of the extra-cosmic void: the evidence and the arguments’, Mnemosyne 46, 473–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. A. (1995) Concepts of Space in Greek Thought, PhA 65 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Algra, K. A. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: The ethical divisiones in Cicero's Lucullus’, in Inwood, & Mansfeld, (1997) 107–40.Google Scholar
Algra, K. A., Horst, P. W. & Runia, D. T., edd. (1996) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Greek Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his 60th Birthday, PhA 72 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H. & Schrijvers, P. H., edd. (1997) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1993) ‘Pyrrhonism and medical empiricism: Sextus Empiricus on evidence and inference’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 37.1, 646–90.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic probabilism and Stoic epistemology’, CQ 44, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpers, K. (1968) ‘Epikurs Geburtstag’, MH 25, 48–51.Google Scholar
Amsler, M. (1989) Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Amsterdam).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeli, A. (1981) ‘I frammenti di Idomeneo di Lampsaco’, CErc II, 41–101.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1986) ‘Compendi, eklogai, tetrapharmakos: due capitoli di dissenso nell'Epicureismo’, CErc 16, 53–66.Google Scholar
Angeli, A., ed. (1988a) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola (PHerc. 1005), La scuola di Epicuro 7 (Naples).Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1988b) ‘La scuola epicurea di Lampsaco nel PHerc. 176 (Fr. 5 Coll. I, IV, VIII–XXIII)’, CErc 18, 27–51.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1993) ‘Frammenti di lettere di Epicuro nei papiri d'Ercolano’, CErc 23, 11–27.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. & Colaizzo, M. (1979) ‘I frammenti di Zenone Sidonio’, CErc, 9, 47–133.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. & Dorandi, T. (1987) ‘Il pensiero matematico di Demetrio Lacone’, CErc 17, 89–103.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1977) ‘Plato and Aristotle on friendship and altruism’, Mind 86, 532–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1980a) ‘Aristotle on pleasure and goodness’, in Rorty, A. O., ed., Essays on Aristotle's Ethics (Berkeley) 285–99.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1980b) ‘Truth and knowledge’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 84–104.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1986) ‘Doing without objective values: ancient and modern strategies’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a) 3–29.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1987) ‘Epicurus on pleasure and happiness’, Philosophical Topics 15, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1988a) ‘Naturalism in Greek ethics: Aristotle and after’, in Cleary, & Shartin, (1988) 149–71.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1988b) ‘The heirs of Socrates’, Phronesis 33, 100–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1989a) ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989) 151–73.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1989b) ‘Epicurean emotions’, GRBS 30, 145–64.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1990a) ‘Platon le sceptique’, RMM 95, 267–91.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1990b) ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Everson, (1990a) 184–203.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1991) ‘Epicurus' philosophy of mind’, in Everson, (1991a) 84–101.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1992a) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Hellenistic culture and society 8 (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1992b) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the Peripatetics’, Elenchos 13, 201–32.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1992c) ‘Plato the Sceptic’, OSAP suppl. vol., 43–72.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1993a) The Morality of Happiness (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1993b) ‘Epicurus on agency’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) 53–71.Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. & Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. E. & Barnes, J., trans. (1994) Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1956) ‘Aristotle and the sea battle’, Mind 65.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. repr. in The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, vol. I: From Parmenides to Wittgenstein (Oxford 1981) 44–55.Google Scholar
Anton, J. P. & Preuss, A., edd. (1983) Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, vol. II (Albany).Google Scholar
Antoniadis, E. (1916) Aristipp und die Kyrenaiker (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Apelt, O. (1891) Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Appuhn, Ch., ed. (1952) Cicéron: De la divination – Du destin – Académiques (Paris).Google Scholar
Arnim, J. von, ed. (1903–24) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, Bd. I–III; Bd. IV, indices by Adler, M. (Leipzig, later repr.).Google Scholar
Arnim, J. von (1926) ‘Arius Didymus' Abriß der peripatetischen Ethik’, SAWW, phil.-hist. Kl. 204.3.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G., ed. (1973) Epicuro: Opere, 2nd edn, Biblioteca di cultura filosofica 41 (Turin).Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1978) ‘Philia e physiologia: i fondamenti dell'amicizia epicurea’, MD, 1, 49–63.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1980) ‘Aporie aristoteliche ed etica epicurea’, MD 5, 9–26.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1984) ‘Devoir et plaisir chez Epicure’, in Harmatta, J., ed. Proceedings of the VIIth Congress of the International Federation of the Societies of Classical Studies (Budapest) 385–91.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1987) Poeti, eruditi e biografi, Momenti della riflessione dei Greci sulla letteratura, Biblioteca di studi antichi 52 (Pisa).Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1994) ‘Riflessione sulla letteratura e biografia presso i Greci’, in Montanari, (1994).Google Scholar
Arthur, E. P. (1983) ‘Stoic analysis of the mind's reactions to presentations’, Hermes III 1983, 69–78.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Cornell studies in classical philology 42 (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990a) ‘Free action and the swerve’, OSAP 8, 275–91.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990b) ‘Philodemus' Epicureanism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2369–406.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990c) ‘The poetic theory of the Stoic “Aristo”’, Apeiron 23, 147–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1992) ‘An Epicurean survey of poetic theories (Philodemus On Poems 5, cols. 26–36)’, CQ 42, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1995) ‘Epicurean Semiotics’, in: Manetti, (1995) 155–85.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1967) Scipio Aemilianus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) ‘Hand over fist: the failure of Stoic rhetoric’, CQ 38, 392–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, C. (1993) The Stoics on Ambiguity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (1990) ‘“Domina et regina virtutum”: justice and societas in the De Officiis’, Phronesis 35, 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1980) Concepts et Catégories dans la Pensée Antique (Paris).Google Scholar
Aune, D. E (1987) The New Testament in its Literary Environment, Library of Early Christianity 8 (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Ausland, H. W. (1989) ‘On the moral origin of the Pyrrhonian philosophy’, Elenchos 10, 359–434.Google Scholar
Avotins, I. (1983) ‘On some Epicurean and Lucretian arguments for the infinity of the universe’, CQ 33, 421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ax, W. (1986) Laut, Stimme und Sprache: Studien zu drei Grundbegriffen der antiken Sprachtheorie, Hypomnemata 84 (Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ax, W. (1987) ‘Quadripertita ratio: Bemerkungen zur Geschichte eines aktuellen Kategoriensystem’, in Taylor, (1987a) 17–40.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (1991) ‘Sprache als Gegenstand der alexandrinischen und pergamenischen Philologie’, in Schmitter, (1991) 275–301.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le Stoïcisme, Publications de l'Université de Lyon (Paris).Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1974) La Religion des Philosophes Grecs, de Thales aux Stoiciens (Paris).Google Scholar
Badawi, A. (1971) Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en grec et autres épîtres (Beirut).Google Scholar
Badawi, A. (1987 (1968)) La Transmission de la Philosophie Grecque au Monde Arabe, Etudes de philosophie medievale 56 (Paris).Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1958) ‘Alexander the Great and the unity of mankind’, Historia 7, 425–44.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus. The Extant Remains (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1928) The Greek Atomists and Epicurus (Oxford, various repr.).Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984) Introduzione alla Logica Stoica, La logica stoica: testimonianze e frammenti (Como).Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C. (1959) ‘Zeno's ideal state’, JHS, 79, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldry, H. C. (1965) The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baratin, M. (1989) La Naissance de la Syntaxe à Rome (Paris).Google Scholar
Baratin, M. (1991) ‘Aperçu de la linguistique stoïcienne’, in Schmitter, (1991) 193–216.Google Scholar
Baratin, M. & Desbordes, F. (1987) ‘La “troisième partie” de l'ars grammatica’, in Taylor, (1987a) 41–66.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (1969) ‘Epicure et le scepticisme’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (Paris) 286–93.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. (1983) ‘Sul concetto epicureo della sicurezza esterna’, in AA. VV., (1983) 73–92.Google Scholar
Barker, A. (1989) Greek Musical Writings, vol. II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Barker, E. (1956) From Alexander to Constantine. Passages and Documents Illustrating the History of Social and Political Ideas, 336 bc–ad 337 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1978) ‘La doctrine du retour éternel’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 3–20.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1979) The Presocratic Philosophers, 2 vols. (London/New York; repr. 1982 in one vol.).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Proof destroyed’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 161–81.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982b) ‘Medicine, experience and logic’, in Barnes, J. et al. (1982a) 24–68.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982c) ‘The beliefs of a Pyrrhonist’, PCPS 28, 1–28, also in Elenchos 4 (1983) 5–43.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983a) ‘Ancient skepticism and causation’, in Burnyeat, (1983) 149–203.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983b) ‘Terms and sentences’, PBA 69, 279–326.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985) ‘Theophrastus and hypothetical syllogistic’, in Wiesner, (1985–87) I, 557–76, also in Fortenbaugh, et al. (1985) 125–41.
Barnes, J. (1986a) ‘Peripatetic negations’, OSAP 4, 201–14.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1986b) ‘The Logical Investigations of Chrysippus’, Wissenschaftskolleg Jahrbuch 1984/5 (Berlin) 19–29.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1986c) ‘Diogene Laerzio e il Pirronismo’, in Giannantoni, (1986a) 383–427.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1986d) ‘Is rhetoric an art?’, Darg Newsletter II.2, 2–22.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1987) ‘An Aristotelian way with Scepticism’, in Matthen, (1987) 51–76.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988b) ‘Bits and pieces’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 223–94.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988c) ‘Epicurean signs’, OSAP suppl. vol., 91–134.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989a) ‘The size of the sun in antiquity’, ACD 25, 29–41.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989b) (rev. Hülser 1987, vols. II–IV) CR 39, 263–4.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989c) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989) 51–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990a) ‘Logical form and logical matter’, in Alberti, (1990) 7–119.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990b) The Toils of Scepticism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990c) ‘Pyrrhonism, belief and causation. Observations on the Scepticism of Sextus Empiricus’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2608–95.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1991) ‘Enseigner la Vertu?’, RPh 116, 571–89.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The philosophy of Pyrrhonism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.6 (Berlin/New York) 4241–301.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993a) ‘“A third kind of syllogism”: Galen and the logic of relations’, in Sharples, (1993) 172–94.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993b) ‘Meaning, saying and thinking’, in Döring, & Ebert, (1993) 47–61.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993c) (rev. Ebert 1991) CR 43, 304–6.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993d) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Kollesch, & Nickel, (1993) 33–52.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996a) ‘Epicurus: meaning and thinking’, in Giannantoni, & Gigante, (1996), vol. I, 197–220.
Barnes, J. (1996b) ‘The catalogue of Chrysippus' logical works’, in Algra, et al. (1996) 169–84.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996c) ‘Grammar on Aristotle's terms’, in Frede, & Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) ‘Logic in Academica I and the Lucullus’, in Inwood, & Mansfeld, (1997) 140–60.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. & Schofield, M., edd. (1982a) Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice (Cambridge/Paris).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. & Mignucci, M., edd. (1988a) Matter and Metaphysics. Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, Elenchos 14 (Naples).Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. & Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7 (London).Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1922) Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica, Philologus Suppl. 15, H. 2 (Leipzig; repr. Hildesheim 1967).Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1957) Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik, Abh. Sächsischen Akad. der Wiss. zu Leipzig, Philol.-hist. Kl. Bd. 49.3 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. & Long, A. A., edd. (1992a) Hierocles, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, vol. I, 1 (Florence) 268–451.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. & Long, A. A., edd. (1992b) ‘Dopo la nuova edizione degli Elementi di etica di Ierocle Stoico (PBerol 978ov)’, in Studi su Codici e Papiri Filosofici. Platone, Aristotele, Ierocle (Florence) 221–47.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. & Sedley, D. N. (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, vol. III (Florence) 227–562.Google Scholar
Becker, L. C., ed. (1992a) Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2 vols. (New York).Google Scholar
Becker, L. C., ed. (1992b) A History of Western Ethics (New York).Google Scholar
Becker, O., ed. (1957a) Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik, Klassisch-philologische Studien 17 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1957b) ‘Über die vier “Themata” der stoischen Logik’, in Becker, (1957a) 27–49.Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1960) ‘Zur Rekonstruktion des “kyrieuon logos” des Diodoros Kronos’, in Derbolav, J. & Nicolin, F., edd., Erkenntnis und Verantwortung, FS Theodor Litt (Dusseldorf) 250–63.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1977) ‘Les “veteres” et la nouvelle jurisprudence à la fin de la République’, RD 55, 7–33.Google Scholar
Benedetto, V. di (1958/9) ‘Dionisio Trace e la Techne a lui attribuita’, ASNP II 27, 169–210; 28, 87–118.Google Scholar
Benedetto, V. di (1990) ‘At the origins of Greek grammar’, Glotta 68, 19–39.Google Scholar
Berger, K. (1984) ‘Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 25.2 (Berlin/New York) 1031–432.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. (1984) ‘Le philosophe Anaxarque et le roi Nicocréon de Salamine’, JS3–49.Google Scholar
Bernheim, E. (1908) Lehrbuch der historischen Methode und der Geschichtsphilosophie, mit Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hilfsmittel zum Studium der Geschichte, 5th and 6th edn, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Berrettoni, P. (1989) ‘An idol of the school: the aspectual theory of the Stoics’, Rivista di linguistica 1, 33–68.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. (1998) ‘Euclid and the Sceptic: a paper on vision, doubt, geometry, light and drunkenness’, Phronesis 43, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, E. (1981) ‘La critica allo scetticismo nel IV libro della Metafisica’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) I, 61–79.
Bett, R. (1989) ‘Carneades' pithanon: a reappraisal of its role and status’, OSAP 7, 59–94.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1990) ‘Carneades' distinction between assent and approval’, The Monist 73, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (1994a) ‘What did Pyrrho think about “the nature of the divine and the good”?’, Phronesis 39, 303–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (1994b) ‘Aristocles on Timon on Pyrrho: The text, its logic, and its credibility’, OSAP 12, 137–81.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. (1983) ‘Hellenismus’, Geschichte und Problematik eines Epochenbegriffs (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Bicknell, P. (1982) ‘Melissus' way of seeming?’, Phronesis 27, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignone, E. (1936) L'Aristotele Perduto e la Formazione Filosofica di Epicuro, 2 vols. (Florence, 2nd enlarged edn by Alfieri, V. E. 1972).Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1982) Ancient Philosophy and Grammar: The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (Chico. Cal.).Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1994) ‘Diogenes of Babylon and the κριτικōί in Philodemus: a preliminary suggestion’, CErc 24 (1994) 55–62.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1995) ‘Philodemus on the technicity of rhetoric’, in Obbink, (1995) 178–88.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, J. (1974) ‘Die skeptika des Sextus Empiricus’, GB 2, 7–14.Google Scholar
Blum, L. A. (1980) Friendship, Altruism and Morality (London).Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1990) ‘Parental nature and Stoic ōίκ∊ίωσις’, AncPhil 10, 221–42.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1986) Die stoische Modallogik, Epistemata, Reihe Philosophie 32 (Würzburg).Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1993) ‘Chrysippus' modal logic and its relation to Philo and Diodorus’, in Döring & Ebert (1993) 63–84.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic syllogistic’, OSAP 14, 133–92.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1997a) ‘Stoic conceptions of freedom and their relation to ethics’, in Sorabji, R., ed., Aristotle and After, BICS Suppl., 71–89.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1997b) ‘The Stoics on hypothesis and hypothetical arguments’, Phronesis 42, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999) ‘Chrysippus' Theory of causes’, in Ierodiakonou, (1999) 196–242.Google Scholar
Bochenski, I. (1947) La logique de Théophraste, Collectanea Friburgensia, N.S. 32 (Fribourg).Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. (1992) ‘Anaximander on the stability of the earth’, Phronesis 37, 336–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollack, J., (1969) ‘Les maximes de l'amitié’, in Actes du VIIIe Congrès Guillaume Budé (Paris) 221–36.Google Scholar
Bollack, J., ed. (1975) La pensée du plaisir – Epicure: textes moraux, commentaires (Paris).Google Scholar
Bollack, J. & Laks, A., edd. (1976) Etudes sur l'épicurisme antique, Cahiers de Philologie I (Lille).Google Scholar
Bouché-Leclercq, A. (1899) L'astrologie grecque (Paris).Google Scholar
Boulluec, A. Le (1982) ‘Exégèse et polémique antignostique chez Irénée et Clément d'Alexandrie: l'exemple du centon’, in Livingstone, E. A., ed., Studia Patristica vol. XVII.2 (Oxford/New York) 707–13.Google Scholar
Boulluec, A. Le (1994) ‘Clément d'Alexandrie’, in Goulet, (1989–94) II, 426–31.
Boyancé, P. (1936) ‘Les méthodes de l'histoire littéraire. Cicéron et son œuvre philosophique’, REL 14, 288–309.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. repr. in id. (1970) Etudes sur l'humanisme cicéronien, Collection Latomus 21 (Brussels) 199–221.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1962) ‘Les preuves stoïciennes de l'existence des dieux d'après Cicéron’, Hermes 90, 46–71.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. (1967) (rev. Giusta 1964) Latomus 26, 246–9.
Boys-Stones, G. (1996) ‘The έπ∊λ∊νστική δϋναμιζ in Aristo's psychology of action’, Phronesis 41, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancacci, A. (1981) ‘La filosofia di Pirrone e le sue relazioni con il cinismo’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) I, 211–42.
Bréhier, E. (1910) La Théorie des Incorporels dans l'Ancien Stoicisme (Paris; repr. 1962).Google Scholar
Bréhier, E. (1914) ‘Posidonius d'Apamée théoricien de la géométrie’, REG 27, 44–58.Google Scholar
Bréhier, E. repr. in Bréhier, (1955) Etudes de philosophie antique (Paris) 117–30.Google Scholar
Brent, A. (1993) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the apostolic succession’, JEH 44, 367–89.Google Scholar
Brent, A. (1995) Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century: Communities in Tension before the Emergence of a Monarch-Bishop, VChr suppl. 31 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1940) ‘Peripatos’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie Suppl. 7, cols. 899–949.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1956) ‘Theophrastus and Zeno on nature in moral theory’, Phronesis 1, 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on Poetry, vol. I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge and later repr.).Google Scholar
Brochard, V. (1887) Les sceptiques grecs (Paris; 2nd edn 1923).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1977) ‘L'argument d'Epicure sur l'immutabilité du tout’, in Permanence de la philosophie: mélanges offerts à Joseph Moreau (Neuchâtel) 127–50; repr. in Brunschwig, (1995) 15–42.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J., ed. (1978a) Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Actes du colloque de Chantilly, 18–22 septembre 1976, Bibliothèque d'histoire de la philosophie (Paris).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1978b) ‘Le modèle conjonctif’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 58–86; repr. in Brunschwig, (1995) 161–87.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1980) ‘Proof defined’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 125–60.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1984) ‘Remarques sur la théorie stoïcienne du nom propre’, HEL 6, 3–19; repr. in Brunschwig, (1995) 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a) 113–44.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988a) ‘La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l'ontologie platonicienne’, in Barnes & Mignucci (1988a) 19–127.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988b) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the kritērion’, in Dillon, & Long, (1988) 145–75, repr. in Brunschwig, (1994a) 224–43.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1990a) ‘Le titre des Indalmoi de Timon: d'Ulysse à Pyrrhon’, Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage 12, 83–98; repr. in Brunschwig, (1995) 271–87.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1990b) ‘Sur une façon stoïcienne de ne pas être’, RThPh 122, 389–403; repr. in Brunschwig, (1995) 251–68.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1991) ‘On a book-title by Chrysippus: on the fact that the ancients admitted dialectic along with demonstrations’, OSAP suppl. vol., 81–95.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1992) ‘Pyrrhon et Philista’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Madec, G., O'Brien, D., edd., ΣOΠIHΣ MAIHTOPEΣ “Chercheurs de sagesse”, Hommage à Jean Pépin (Paris) 133–46.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J., ed. (1994a) Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994b) ‘Remarks on the classification of simple propositions in Hellenistic logics’, in Brunschwig, (1994a) 57–71.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994c) ‘The conjunctive model’, in Brunschwig, (1994a) 72–91.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994d) ‘Did Diogenes of Babylon invent the ontological argument?’, in Brunschwig, (1994a) 170–89.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994e) ‘Once again on Eusebius on Aristocles on Timon on Pyrrho’, in Brunschwig, (1994a) 190–211.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994f) ‘The Anaxarchus case: an essay on survival’, PBA 81, 59–88.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1995) Etudes sur les Philosophes Hellénistiques: epicurisme, stoïcisme, scepticisme (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1996) ‘Le fragment DK 70 B 1 de Métrodore de Chio’, in Algra, et al. (1996) 21–40.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. & Nussbaum, M. C., edd. (1993) Passions and Perceptions: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum, Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1980) ‘On historical fragments and epitomes’, Classical Quarterly 30, 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972) ‘Zur geistesgeschichtlichen Einordnung einiger Pseudopythagorica’, in Pseudepigrapha I, Fondation Hardt 18 (Vandœuvres/Geneva) 25–55.Google Scholar
Burkert, W., Gemelli Marciano, L., Matelli, E. & Orelli, L., edd. (1998) Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike – Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi, Aporemata 3 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1976) ‘Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy’, PhR 85, 44–69.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1978) ‘The upside-down back-to-front sceptic of Lucretius IV 472’, Philologus 122, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980a (1983)) ‘Can the sceptic live his scepticism?’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 20–53; repr. in Burnyeat, (1983) 117–48.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980b) ‘Tranquillity without a stop: Timon, frag. 68’, CQ 30, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1981) ‘Aristotle on understanding knowledge’, in Berti, E., ed., Aristotle on Science—The ‘Posterior Analytics’, Studia Aristotelica 9 (Padua) 97–139.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982a) ‘Idealism and Greek philosophy: what Descartes saw and Berkeley missed’, PhR 91, 3–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982b) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Schofield, & Nussbaum, (1982) 315–38.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982c) ‘The origins of non-deductive inference’, in Barnes, et al. (1982a) 193–238.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F., ed. (1983) The Skeptical Tradition, Major Thinkers Series 3 (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1984) ‘The sceptic in his place and time’, in Rorty, et al. (1984) 225–54.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato (Indianapolis/Cambridge).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘Antipater and self-refutation: elusive arguments in Cicero's Academica’, in Inwood, & Mansfeld, (1997) 277–311.Google Scholar
Burridge, R. A. (1992) What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Calboli Montefusco, L. (1991) ‘Die Topik in der Argumentation’, in Ueding, (1991) 21–34.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1962) Studi grammaticali, vol. I (Bologna).Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (1977) ‘Il problema dell'esistenza di una scuola Megarica’, in Giannantoni, G., ed., Scuole socratiche minori e filosofia ellenistica (Bologna) 25–53.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (1992) ‘Scoperta e dimostrazione in Archimede’, in Dollo, C., ed., Archimede, Mito Tradizione Scienza (Florence) 21–41.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1993) The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes (Oxford).Google Scholar
Cameron, H. D. (1987) ‘The upside-down cladogram: problems in manuscript affiliation’, in Hoenigswald, & Wiener, (1987) 227–42.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. (1984b) ‘Die Gattung Evangelium. Das Evangelium des Markus im Rahmen der antiken Historiographie’, in Cancik, H., d. (1984a) Markus-Philologie (Tübingen) 85–113.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. (1993) Vita di Lucrezio (Palermo).Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1980) ‘Note laerziane’, Elenchos 1, 161–3.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1981) ‘I Problemi di filologia filosofica di Mario Untersteiner’, Elenchos 2, 375–404.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1982) ‘Polistrato uditore di Epicuro?’, CErc 12, 5–12.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1987) Comunità senza rivolta, quattro saggi sull'epicureismo, Saggi Bibliopolis 26 (Naples).Google Scholar
Capasso, M., ed. (1988a) Carneisco: Il Secondo libro del Filista (PHerc. 1027) (Naples).Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1988b) ‘Gli epicurei e il potere della memoria (PHerc. 1041 e 1040)’, in Mandilaras, B. G. et al., edd., Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress of Papyrology I (Athens) 257–70.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1989) ‘Primo supplemento al Catalogo dei papiri Ercolanesi’, CErc 19, 193–264.Google Scholar
Casanova, A., ed. (1984) I frammenti di Diogene d'Enoanda, Studi e testi 6 (Florence).Google Scholar
Casertano, G. (1983) Il piacere, l'amore e la morte nelle dottrine dei presocratici I: Il piacere e il desiderio (Naples).Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1983) Libri scritture scribi a Ercolano, CErc, suppl. 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1984) ‘I rotoli di Ercolano come prodotti scritti. Quattro riflessioni’, Scrittura e Civiltà 8, 5–30.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1989) ‘Libro e cultura scritta’, in Momigliano, A. & Schiavone, A., edd., Storia di Roma, vol. 4, Caratteri e morfologia (Turin) 694–734.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (1994) ‘Discorsi sul libro’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L. & Lanza, D., Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica vol. I, La produzione e la circolazione del testo, T. 3, I Greci e Roma (Rome) 613–39.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. (1990) Pseudopythagorica Ethica, i trattati morali di Archita, Metopo, Teage, Eurifamo, Elenchos 17 (Naples).Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. (1959) The Sentences of Sextus. A Contribution to the History of Early Christian Ethics (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Charles, D. (1992) ‘Supervenience, composition and physicalism’, in Charles, D. & Lennon, K., edd., Reduction, Explanation and Realism (Oxford) 265–96.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. F. (1976) Plutarch's Moralia XIII, part II, LCL (Cambridge, Mass./London).Google Scholar
Chilton, C. W. (1960) ‘Did Epicurus approve of marriage? A study of Diogenes Laertius X, 119’, Phronesis 5, 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, C. W. (1971) Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Fragments. A Translation and Commentary (London/New York/Toronto).Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. (1908) ‘Panaitios und die attische Stoikerinschrift’, RhM 63, 197–223.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1958) ‘Aristippos’, Hermes 86, 182–92.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J., ed. (1983) Philippson, R., Studien zu Epikur und den Epikureern, Olms Studien 17 (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1992) ‘L'esposizione dei Sofisti e della Sofistica in Sesto Empirico’, Elenchos 13, 57–79.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1972) ‘Epicurus' Kuria doxa XVII’, GRBS 13, 59–66.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1973) ‘Epicurus' last will and testament’, AGPh 55, 252–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. (1983a) Lucretius and Epicurus (Ithaca, New York/London).Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1983b) ‘Individual and community in the first generation of the Epicurean school’, in AA. VV. (1983) 255–79.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16, 11–28.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1990) ‘The philosophical inscription of Diogenes of Oenoanda: New discoveries 1969–1983’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2445–559.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. J. & Shartin, D. C., edd. (1988) Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. IV (Lanham).Google Scholar
Cleary, J. J. & Wians, W. C., edd. (1992) Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. VII (Lanham).Google Scholar
Cohen, M. R. & Drabkin, I. E., edd. (1966) A Source Book in Greek Science (Cambridge, Mass.; 1st edn New York 1948).Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1964) ‘The sources and composition of Polybius vi’, Historia 13, 440–86.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1967) Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology (Cleveland).Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1990) The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages I: Stoicism in the Classical Latin Literature, Studies in the history of Christian thought 34, 2nd impr. (Leiden, first edn 1985).Google Scholar
Conche, M. (1973) Pyrrhon ou l'apparence (Villers-sur-Mer).Google Scholar
Conche, M. (1984) ‘Métrodore de Chio’, in Huisman, D., ed., Dictionnaire des philosophes (Paris) 1821.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1989) ‘Greek philosophers on euthanasia and suicide’, in Brody, B. A., ed. (1989) Suicide and Euthanasia: Historical and Contemporary Themes, Philosophy and Medicine 35 (Dordrecht) 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, J., ed. (1974a) Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation (Dordrecht/Boston).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1974b) ‘Remarks on Stoic deduction’, in Corcoran, (1974a) 169–81.Google Scholar
Corssen, P. (1878) De Posidonio Rhodio M. Tulli Ciceronis in libro I. Tusc. disp. et in Somnio Scipionis auctore (Bonn).Google Scholar
Cortassa, G. (1989) ‘Un'ipotesi sulla formazione del corpus di Sesto Empirico: La ricerca sulla tarda antichità’, in Garzya, A., ed., Metodologie della ricerca sulla tarda antichità, Atti del primo convegno dell' associazione di studi tardoantichi (Naples) 297–307.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1929) ‘Le stoïcisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d'Histoire de la Philosophie Générale de la Civilisation 3, 241–76.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. Cited in the English version (1983) ‘The Stoicism of the New Academy’, in Burnyeat, (1983) 31–63.
Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, REG 54, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, T. & Mellor, D. H. (1990) ‘There is no question of physicalism’, Mind 99, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. (1994) ‘Indefinite propositions and anaphora in Stoic logic’, Phronesis 39, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croissant, J. (1984) ‘Autour de la quatrième formule d'implication dans Sextus Empiricus’, RPhA 2.1, 73–120.Google Scholar
Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos, Studien zur Palaeographie und Papyruskunde 6 (Leipzig; repr. Amsterdam 1965).Google Scholar
Crouzel, H., ed. (1969) Grégoire le Thaumaturge: Remerciement à Origène, suivi de la lettre d'Origène à Grégoire, SC 148 (Paris).Google Scholar
Daiber, H., ed. (1980) Aetius Arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer Überlieferung, Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz 33 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Daiber, H. (1992) ‘The Meteorology of Theophrastus in Syriac and Arabic translation’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992) 166–293.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980) ‘Mental events’, in id., Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford; repr. 1985) 207–28.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1982) Actions and Events (Oxford).Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1992) Cities of the Gods: Communist Utopias in Greek Thought (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (1939) ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, AJPh 60, 85–92.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (1948) ‘Stoic views of poetry’, AJPh 69, 241–71.
De Lacy, Ph. (1958) ‘Oὐηλλoν and the antecedents of ancient Scepticism’, Phronesis 3, 59–71.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. repr. in Anton, J. P. & Kostas, G. L., edd. (1971) Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy (Albany) 593–606.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (1977) ‘The four Stoic personae’, ICS 2, 163–72.Google Scholar
De Lacy, Ph., ed. (1984) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, first part: books I–V, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4, 1, 2, ed. 3 (Berlin, first edn 1978).Google Scholar
De Lacy, H. Ph. & De Lacy, E. A. (1978) Philodemus: On Methods of Inference, Rev. ed., La Scuola di Epicuro 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
De Witt, N. W. (1936) ‘Organization and procedure in Epicurean groups’, CPh 31, 205–11.Google Scholar
De Witt, N. W. (1954) Epicurus and his Philosophy (Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1966) Antisthenis Fragmenta (Varese/Milan).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F., ed. (1981a) Pirrone: Testimonianze, Elenchos, 5 (Naples).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1981b) ‘Prolegomena ad una raccolta delle fonti relative a Pirrone di Elide’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) 1, 93–128.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1984) ‘Pirrone e Democrito: Gli atomi: un “mito” ?’, Elenchos 5, 5–23, also published as ‘Démocrite, l'école d'Abdère et le premier pyrrhonisme’, Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Democritus, vol. B, 139–56.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1986) ‘Pirroniani ed accademici nel III secolo a.C.’, in Flashar, & Gigon, (1986) 147–78.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1988) ‘La “materia scorrevole” — Sulle tracce di un dibattito perduto’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 425–70.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992a) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academy’, CQ 42, 176–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992b) ‘Sesto e gli Scettici’, Elenchos 13, 277–327.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. & Funghi, M. S. (1988) ‘Un testo sul concetto stoico di progresso morale (PMilVogliano inv. 1241)’, in Aristoxenica, Menandrea, Fragmenta philosophica. Studi e testi per il Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini 3 (Florence) 85–124.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1930 (repr. w. add. 1965)) Die Griechische Empirikerschule. Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre (Berlin/Zürich).Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1937) ‘Persaios (1)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 19.1, cols. 926–31.Google Scholar
Delamarre, A. J.-L. (1980) ‘La notion de ΠTΣ∑I∑ chez Aristote et les Stoïciens’, in Aubenque, (1980) 321–45.Google Scholar
Delatte, L., ed. (1942) Les Traités de la Royauté d'Ecphante, Diotogène et Sténidas (Liège/Paris).Google Scholar
Denniston, J. (1934) The Greek Particles (Oxford; 2nd edn 1950, various repr.).Google Scholar
Denyer, N. C. (1981a) ‘The atomism of Diodorus Cronus’, Prudentia 13, 33–45.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. C. (1981b) ‘Time and modality in Diodorus Cronus’, Theoria 47, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, N. C. (1983) ‘The origins of justice’, in AA. VV. (1983) 133–52.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. C. (1988) ‘Stoicism and token reflexivity’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 375–96.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. C. (1991) Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy (London/New York).Google Scholar
Desbordes, B. A. (1990) Introduction à Diogène Laërce, Exposition de l'Altertumswissenschaft servant de préliminaires critiques à une lecture de l'oeuvre, 2 vols. (Utrecht).Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. (1987) ‘Elementa. Remarques sur le rôle de l'écriture dans la linguistique antique’, Cahiers de philosophie ancienne 5, 339–55.Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. (1990) Idées Romaines sur l'Ecriture (Lille).Google Scholar
Deuse, W. (1993) ‘Celsus im Prooemium von “De medicina”: Römische Aneignung griechischer Wissenschaft’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 37.1 (Berlin/New York) 819–41.Google Scholar
Diano, C. (1935) ‘Note epicuree’, SIFC 12, 61–86, 237–89.Google Scholar
Diano, C. (1974) ‘La psicologia d'Epicuro e la teoria delle passioni’, in Diano, C., Scritti epicurei (Florence) 129–280.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci (Berlin, later repr.).Google Scholar
Diels, H., ed. (1893) Anonymi Londinensis Ex Aristotelis Iatricis Menoniis et aliis medicis Eclogae, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, suppl. Arist. 3.1 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1894) ‘Aus dem Leben des Cynikers Diogenes’, AGPh 7, 313–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, H., ed. (1901) Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta (Berlin).Google Scholar
Diels, H., ed. (1903) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Berlin, numerous rev. edns.).Google Scholar
Diels, H., ed. (1916/17) Philodemos über die Götter, Erstes und drittes Buch, Abh. der königlich Preussischen Akad. der Wiss. 1915.7/1916.4 and 6, philos.-hist. Klasse (Berlin).Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1970) Studien zur Griechischen Biographie, 2nd edn, NAWG 3. F. Nr. 37 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1986a) Die Entstehung der Historischen Biographie, SAHW, Philos.-hist. Kl. 1986.3 (Heidelberg [1987]).Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1986b) ‘Philosophie-Fachwissenschaft-Allgemeinbildung’, in Flashar, & Gigon, (1986) 185–223.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1987) Archimedes, 2nd edn (Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. (1983; 1990) ‘What happened to Plato's Garden?’, Hermathena 133, 51–9; repr. in Dillon (1990) study 1.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1990) The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity, CSS 333 (Aldershot).Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. & Long, A. A., edd. (1988) The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Hellenistic Culture and Society 3 (Berkeley/Los Angeles; repr. 1996).Google Scholar
Dionigi, I. (1976) ‘Lucr. 6, 1198–1203 e P. Oxy. 215 col. 17–24: L'epicureismo e la venerazione degli dei’, SIFC 48, 118–39.Google Scholar
Dirlmeier, F. (1937) Die Oikeiosis-Lehre Theophrasts, Philologus, Suppl. 30, H. 1 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Dobbs, B. J. T. (1985) ‘Newton and Stoicism’, in Epp (1985) 109–23.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1974–5) ‘Fato e volontà umana in Crisippo’, AAT 109, 187–230.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1995a) ‘Pathos nello stoicismo romano’, Elenchos 16, 193–216.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1995b) ‘Struttura delle passioni e del vizio e loro cura in Crisippo’, Elenchos 16, 305–29.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., ed. (1982a) Filodemo: Il buon re secondo Omero, La scuola di Epicuro 3 (Naples).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1982b) ‘Filodemo, Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339)’, CErc 12, 91–133.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., ed. (1990a) ‘Filodemo: gli orientamenti della ricerca attuale’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2328–68.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1990b) ‘Filodemo storico del pensiero antico’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2407–23.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1990c) ‘Gli arconti nei papiri ercolanesi’, ZPE 84, 121–38.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1991a) ‘Figure femminili della filosofia antica’, in De Martino, F., ed., Rose della Pieria (Bari) 261–78.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., ed. (1991b) Filodemo: Storia dei Filosofi [.]: Platone e l'Academia (PHerc. 1021 e 164), La Scuola di Epicuro 12 (Naples).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1991c) Ricerche sulla Cronologia dei Filosofi Ellenistici, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 19 (Stuttgart).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1991d) ‘Den Autoren über die Schulter geschaut: Arbeitsweise und Autographie bei den antiken Schriftstellern’, ZPE 87, 11–33.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1992a) ‘Considerazioni sull' index locupletior di Diogene Laerzio’, Prometheus 18, 121–6.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1992b) ‘Il quarto libro delle “Vite” di Diogene Laerzio’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3761–92.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1993) ‘Estratti dal III libro di Diogene Laerzio in un codice di Vienna (cod. phil. gr. 314)’, SCO 43, 63–70.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994a) Filodemo: Storia dei filosofi: La Stoà da Zenone a Panezio (PHerc. 1018), PhA 60 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994b) ‘Bryson d'Achaïe’, in Goulet, (1989–94) II, 142.
Dorandi, T. (1994c) ‘I frammenti di Anassarco di Abdera’, Atti e Memorie dell' Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere La Colombaria 69 N.S. 45, 11–59.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994d) ‘De Zénon d'Elée à Anaxarque’, in Jerphagnon, et al. (1994) 27–37.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1995a) ‘Prolegomena per una edizione dei frammenti di Antigono di Caristo. III’, ZPE 106, 61–90.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1995b) ‘La “Villa dei Papiri” a Ercolano e la sua biblioteca’, CPh168–82.Google Scholar
Döring, K., ed. (1972) Die Megariker – Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1978) ‘Antike Theorien über die staatspolitische Notwendigkeit der Götterfurcht’, A & A 24, 43–56.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1987) Historia Philosopha, Grundzüge der antiken Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung (Freiburg i.Br./Würzburg).Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1988) Der Sokratesschüler Aristipp und die Kyrenaiker, AAWM, Geistes- und Sozialwiss. Klasse, 1988.1 (Mainz).Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1989) ‘Gab es eine Dialektische Schule ?’, Phronesis 34, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1992) ‘Die sog. kleinen Sokratiker und ihre Schulen bei Sextus Empiricus’, Elenchos 13, 81–118.Google Scholar
Döring, K. & Ebert, T., edd. (1993) Dialektiker und Stoiker. Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer, Philosophie der Antike 1 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Dorival, G. (1992) ‘L'apport d'Origène pour la connaissance de la philosophie grecque’, in Daly, R. J., ed. (1992) Origeniana quinta, BETL 105 (Leuven) 189–216.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1970) ‘Chrysippos (14)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie Suppl. 12, cols. 148–55.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. & Baltes, M. (1993) Der Platonismus in der Antike: Grundlagen – System – Entwicklung III: Der Platonismus im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert nach Christus (Stuttgart/Bad Canstatt).Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. & Baltes, M. (1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike IV (Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt).Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) ‘Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell, (1995a) 197–218.Google Scholar
Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and the Providence of the Gods (Athens).Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R. (1937) A History of Cynicism from Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. (London; repr. 1976).Google Scholar
Duhot, J.-J. (1989) La conception stoïcienne de la causalité (Paris).Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (1969) ‘Pyrrhon et le scepticisme ancien’, in Parain, B., ed., Histoire de la philosophie (Paris) vol. I: Orient, Antiquité, Moyen Age, 717–23.Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (1972) Le Scepticisme et le Phénomène — Essai sur la signification et les origines du pyrrhonisme (2nd edn Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (1982) ‘Diogène de Babylone et la preuve ontologique’, RPh 107, 389–95.Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (1983) ‘Diogène de Babylone et la déesse Raison. La Métis des stoïciens’, BAGB260–78.Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P., ed. (1988) Les Présocratiques, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade 345 (Paris).Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1986) ‘Sic erimus cuncti… The Skeleton in Graeco-Roman Art’, JDAI 101, 185–255.Google Scholar
Düring, I., ed. (1932) Porphyrios Kommentar zur Harmonielehre des Ptolemaios (Göteborg).Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi, A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies, 3 vols. (Leiden).Google Scholar
Ebert, T. (1987) ‘The origin of the Stoic theory of signs in Sextus Empiricus’, OSAP 5, 83–126.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus, Hypomnemata 95 (Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, L. (1932) ‘Die Geschichte der Sektion in der Antike’, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Medizin 3, 50–106 (100–56); Engl. transl. in Temkin, & Temkin, (1967) 247–301.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. (1933) ‘Empirie und Skepsis in der Lehre der griechischen Empirikerschule’, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Medizin 3, 45–53 (253–61); Engl. transl. in Temkin, & Temkin, (1967) 195–203.Google Scholar
Edelstein, L. (1952) ‘The relation of ancient philosophy to medicine’, BHM 26, 299–316; repr. in Temkin, & Temkin, (1967) 349–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Edelstein, L. & Kidd, I. G., edd. (1972) Posidonius, I: The Fragments, Classical Texts and Commentaries 13 (Cambridge; 2nd ed. 1989).Google Scholar
Edlow, , Blair, R., 1975, ‘The Stoics on ambiguity’, JHPh 13, 423–36.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1970) Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der aristotelischen Schrift “Über die Philosophie”, Zetemata 50 (Munich).Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1967) Zur stoischen Dialektik (Basle).Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1981) Das Dioklesfragment bei Diogenes Laertios, Sonderforschungsbereich 99 Linguistik 55 (Konstanz).Google Scholar
Einarson, B. & De Lacy, P. H., edd. (1967) Plutarch's Moralia, vol. XIV, LCL (London/Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1983) Sour Grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1984) Ulysses and the Sirens: studies in rationality and irrationality (rev. edn, Cambridge; Paris).Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis, moral development and social interaction in early Stoic philosophy, Studies in Hellenistic civilization 2 (Aarhus).Google Scholar
Englert, W. G. (1987) Epicurus on the Swerve and Voluntary Action, American Classical Studies 16 (Atlanta).Google Scholar
Epp, R. E., ed. (1985) Spindel Conference 1984: Recovering the Stoics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23, Suppl. (Memphis).Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1991) ‘EΠITHΔEYEIN A∑AφEIAN. Zu Philodem Πρòς τoὐς [ἑταíρouς] (PHerc. 1005) col. XVI Angeli’, CErc 21, 83–8.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1992a) ‘Orthodoxie und Anpassung. Philodem, ein Panaitis des Kepos?’, MH 49, 171–200.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1992b) ‘Cicero und “unorthodoxer” Epikureismus’, Anregung 38, 307–22.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen) 281–303.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1994) ‘1. Epikur; 2. Die Schule Epikurs; 3. Lukrez’, in Flashar (1994) 29–490.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (1997a) ‘Römische Philosophie’, in Graf, F., ed., Einleitung in die lateinische Philologie (Stuttgart/Leipzig) 537–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, M. (1997b) ‘Physics as therapy. Meditative elements in Lucretius' De rerum natura’, in Algra et al. (1997) 79–92.Google Scholar
Erler, M. & Ungern-Sternberg, J. v. (1987) ‘κακòν γμναĩκ∊ς. Griechisches zu der Rede des Metellus Macedonius De prole augenda’, MH 44, 254–6.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. & Robin, L. (1925–8) Lucrèce: De Rerum Natura. Commentaire exégétique et critique, 3 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1990) The Hellenistic Stoa, Political Thought and Action (London).Google Scholar
Evans, C. F. (1970) ‘The New Testament in the making’, in Ackroyd & Evans (1970a) 232–84.Google Scholar
Evans, J. D. G. (1974) ‘The Old Stoa on the truth-value of oaths’, PCPhS 20, 43–7.Google Scholar
Everson, S., ed. (1990a) Epistemology, Companions to Ancient Thought 1 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1990b) ‘Epicurus on the truth of the senses’, in Everson (1990a) 161–83.Google Scholar
Everson, S., ed. (1991a) Psychology, Companions to Ancient Thought 2 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1991b) ‘The objective appearance of Pyrrhonism’, in Everson (1991a) 121–47.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1994a) Language, Companions to Ancient Thought 3 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1994b) ‘Epicurus on mind and language’, in Everson (1994a) 74–108.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1994c) ‘Aristotle's theory of the mind’, in Barnes, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Fahr, W. (1969) “θEOYσ NOMIZEIN”, Zum Problem der Anfänge des Atheismus bei den Griechen, Spudasmata 26 (Hildesheim/New York).Google Scholar
Farrington, B. (1939) Science and Politics in the Ancient World (London, 2nd edn 1965).Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1956/7; 1958) ‘Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion’, Glotta 35, 214–70; 36, 48–100.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1958) (rev. Barwick 1957) GGA 212, 161–73.
Fehling, D. (1965) ‘Zwei Untersuchungen zur griechischen Sprachphilosophie’, RhM 108, 212–29.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1979) (rev. Siebenborn 1976) Gnomon 51, 488–90.
Ferrari, G. A. (1981) ‘L'immagine dell'equilibrio’, in Giannantoni (1981a) I, 337–70.Google Scholar
Ferraria, L. & Santese, G. (1981) ‘Bibliografia sullo Scetticismo antico (1880–1978)’, in Giannantoni (1981a) II, 753–850.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J. L. (1988) Philhellénisme et Impérialisme, Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate (Rome).Google Scholar
Festa, N. (1935) I frammenti degli stoici antichi, vol. 2 (Bari; repr. Hildesheim/New York 1971).Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1949) La révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, II: Le Dieu cosmique (Paris, later repr.).Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1985) Epicure et ses dieux, 3rd edn (Paris, 1st edn, 1946).Google Scholar
Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le De ira de Sénèque et la philosophie stoïcienne des passions, Etudes et commentaires 94 (Paris).Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. (1968) ‘Diogenes the Cynic’, in id., ed., Aspects of Antiquity: Discoveries and Controversies (London).Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. (1983) Politics in the Ancient World (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flashar, H., ed. (1983) Grundrifs der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 3: Ältere Akademie-Aristoteles-Peripatos (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Flashar, H., ed. (1994) Grundrifs der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 4: Die hellenistische Philosophie (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Flashar, H. & Gigon, O., edd. (1986) Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique, Fondation Hardt 32 (Vandœuvres/Geneva).Google Scholar
Flintoff, E. (1980) ‘Pyrrho and India’, Phronesis 25, 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foraboschi, D. (1984) ‘Filodemo, Sull'economia’, in Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di papirologia (Naples) vol. 2, 537–42.Google Scholar
Forschner, M. (1981) Die Stoische Ethik: über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprachu. Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System (Stuttgart; repr. Darmstadt 1995).Google Scholar
Forschner, M. (1982) ‘Epikurs Theorie des Glücks’, ZPhF 36, 179–88.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., ed. (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus, RUSCH 1 (New Brunswick/London).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. & Long, A. A., edd. (1985) Theophrastus of Eresus: On his Life and Work, RUSCH 2 (New Brunswick/Oxford).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., & Sharples, R. W., edd. (1988) Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion, and Rhetoric, RUSCH 3 (New Brunswick/Oxford).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Steinmetz, P., edd. (1989) Cicero's Knowledge of the Peripatos, RUSCH 4 (New Brunswick/London).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Gutas, D., edd. (1992a) Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings, RUSCH 5 (New Brunswick/London).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., Sharples, R. W. & Gutas, D., edd. (1992b) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence, 2 vols., Philosophia Antiqua 54.1–2 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. & Mirhady, D. C., edd. (1994) Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, RUSCH 6 (New Brunswick/London).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Technologies of the self’, in Martin, L. H., Gutman, H. & Hutton, P. H., edd., Technologies of the Self: a Seminar with Michel Foucault (Amherst) 16–49.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1984) ‘Sceptics and Epicureans’, OSAP 2, 237–67.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1986) (rev. Asmis 1984) JHS 106, 227–31.CrossRef
Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘Lucretius and politics’, in Griffin & Barnes (1989) 120–50.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1925 (1968)) ‘Xenophanesstudien’, Hermes 60, 174–92, repr. in Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens (Munich) 335–49.Google Scholar
Fraisse, J.-C. (1974) Philia. La notion d'amitié dans la philosophie antique (Paris).Google Scholar
Franco Repellini, F. (1985) ‘Ipparco e la tradizione astronomica’, in Giannantoni & Vegetti (1985) 187–224.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1969) ‘The career of Erasistratus of Ceos’, RIL 103, 518–37.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1972) Ptolemaic Alexandria, 3 vols. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1973) (rev. Stough 1969) JPh 70, 805–10.
Frede, M. (1974a) Die stoische Logik, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Gottingen. Philol.-hist. Kl. Folge 3, Nr. 88 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974b) ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian syllogistic’, AGPh 56, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1977) ‘The origins of traditional grammar’, in Butts, R. E. & Hintikka, J., edd., Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht/Boston) 51–79.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1978) ‘Principles of Stoic grammar’, in Rist (1978b) 27–75; repr. in Frede (1987a) 301–37.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1979) ‘Des Skeptikers Meinungen’, Neue Hefte für Philosophie, Aktualität der Antike 15/16, 102–29.Google Scholar
Frede, M. repr. as ‘The skeptic's beliefs’, in Frede (1987a) 179–200.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1980) ‘The original notion of cause’, in Schofield et al. (1980a) 217–49; repr. in Frede (1987a) 125–50.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1982) ‘The method of the so-called methodical school of medicine’, in Barnes et al. (1982a) 1–23; repr. in Frede (1987a) 261–78.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1983) ‘Stoics and Skeptics on clear and distinct impressions’, in Burnyeat (1983) 65–93; repr. in Frede (1987a) 151–76.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1984) ‘The sceptic's two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge’, in Rorty et al. (1984) 255–78; repr. Frede (1987a) 201–22.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986a) ‘Philosophy and medicine in antiquity’, in Donagan, A., Perovich, A. N. & Wedin, M. V., edd., Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, Essays Presented to Marjorie Grene (Dordrecht) 211–32; repr. in Frede (1987a) 225–42.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986b) ‘The Stoic doctrine of the affections of the soul’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a) 93–110.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987a) Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987b) ‘The ancient empiricists’, in Frede (1987a) 243–60.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1988) ‘The empiricist attitude towards reason and theory’, in Hankinson (1988c) 79–97.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1990) ‘An empiricist view of knowledge: memorism’, in Everson (1990a) 225–50.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1992) ‘Plato's arguments and the dialogue form’, OSAP suppl. vol., 201–19.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994) ‘The Stoic notion of a lekton’, in Everson (1994a) 109–129.Google Scholar
Frede, M. & Striker, G., edd. (1996) Rationality in Greek Thought (Oxford).Google Scholar
Frenkian, A. M. (1958) ‘Der griechische Skeptizismus und die indische Philosophie’, Bibliotheca Classica Orientalis 3, 212–49.Google Scholar
Freytag, W. (1995) Mathematische Grundbegriffe bei Sextus Empiricus, Spudasmata 57 (Hildesheim).
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and philosophical recruitment in ancient Greece (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Fritz, K. (1926) Quellenuntersuchungen zu Leben und Philosophie des Diogenes von Sinope, Philologus. Supplementband 18, H. 2 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Fritz, K. (1963) ‘Pyrrhon aus Elis Skeptiker’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 24.1, cols. 89–106.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. (1971 (1955)) Grundprobleme der Geschichte der antiken Wissenschaft (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, K. (1972) ‘Zenon (4)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 10.A, col. 122.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1967) Two Studies in the Greek Atomists, 1. Indivisible Magnitudes. 2. Aristotle and Epicurus on Voluntary Action (Princeton).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1971) ‘Knowledge of atoms and void in Epicureanism’, in Anton, J. P. & Kustas, G. L., edd., Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy I (Albany) 607–19.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1978) ‘Lucretius the Epicurean. On the history of man’, in Lucrèce, Fondation Hardt 24 (Vandœuvres/Geneva) 1–37.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1985) ‘Strato's theory of the void’, in Wiesner (1985–7) I, 594–609.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1986) ‘Nothing to us?’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a) 75–91.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1988) (rev. Asmis 1984) AGPh 70, 108–11.
Furley, D. J. (1989a (1966)) ‘Lucretius and the Stoics’, in Furley (1989c) 183–205.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1989b (1985)) ‘Strato's theory of the void’, in Furley (1989c) 149–60.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1989c) Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. & Wilkie, J. S. (1984) Galen on Respiration and the Arteries (Princeton).Google Scholar
Gallo, I., ed. (1980) Frammenti biografici da papiri II: La biografia dei filosofi (Rome).Google Scholar
Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II sec. a.C., Studi e testi 6 (Turin).Google Scholar
Garofalo, I., ed. (1988), Erasistrati fragmenta, Biblioteca di studi antichi 62 (Pisa).Google Scholar
Gercke, A., ed. (1885) Chrysippea (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1958) I Cirenaici. Raccolta delle fonti antiche, traduzione e studio introduttivo (Florence).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G., ed. (1981a) Lo scetticismo antico, 2 vols., Elenchos6.1–2 (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1981b) ‘Pirrone, la scuola scettica e il sistema delle “successioni”’, in Giannantoni (1981a) I, 11–34.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1981c) ‘Il KYPIEYΩN ∧OΓOσ di Diodoro Crono’, Elenchos 2, 239–72.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1984) ‘Il piacere cinetico nell'etica epicurea’, Elenchos 5, 25–44.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G., ed. (1986a) Diogene Laerzio storico del pensiero antico, Elenchos 7 (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1986b) ‘Socrate e i Socratici in Diogene Laerzio’, in Giannantoni (1986a) 183–216.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G., ed. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae, 4 vols., Elenchos 18 (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G., ed. (1992) Sesto Empirico e il pensiero antico, Elenchos 23 (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. & Gigante, M., edd. (1996) Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale Naples 19–26 Maggio (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. & Vegetti, M., edd. (1985) La scienza ellenistica (Naples).Google Scholar
Giannattasio Andria, R. (1989) I frammenti delle ‘Successioni dei filosofi’, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità, Università degli studi di Salerno 5 (Naples).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1960) ‘Il panlogismo stoico e il testo di Diogene Laerzio’, PP 15, 415–27.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1975) ‘“Philosophia medicans” in Filodemo’, CErc 5, 53–61.Google Scholar
Gigante, M., ed. (1979) Catalogo dei papiri Ercolanesi (Naples).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1981) Scetticismo e epicureismo. Per l'avviamento di un discorso storiografico, Elenchos 4 (Naples).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983a) Ricerche filodemee, 2nd edn (Naples).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983b) Diogene Laerzio: Vite dei filosofi, BUL, 3rd edn (Rome/Bari).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983c) ‘Frammenti di Ippoboto. Contributo alla storia della storiografia filosofica’, in Mastrocinque, A., ed., Studi P. Treves (Padua).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1986) ‘Biografia e dossografia in Diogene Laerzio’, in Giannantoni (1986a) 7–102.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1987a) La bibliothèque de Philodème et l'Epicuréisme Romain. Préface Grimal, P. (Paris).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1988) ‘Prefazione alla stampa della dissertazione di A. Schober sulla prima parte dell'opera “De pietate” di Filodemo’, CErc 18, 65–6.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1992) Cinismo e Epicurismo (Naples).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum (Ann Arbor) (originally published as Filodemo in Italia (Florence 1990)).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. & Dorandi, T. (1980) ‘Anassarco e Epicuro “Sul regno”’, in Romano, F., ed. (1980) 479–97.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1949) Epikur: Von der Überwindung der Furcht (Zürich).Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1983) ‘Did Chrysippus understand Medea?’, Phronesis 28, 136–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) ‘Personhood and personality: the four- personae theory in Cicero De Officiis I’, OSAP 6, 169–99.Google Scholar
Giusta, M. (1964–7) I dossografi di etica, 2 vols., Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia, Università di Torino vol. 15, fasc. 3–4 (Turin).Google Scholar
Glibert-Thirry, A., ed. (1977) Pseudo-Andronicus de Rhodes: ‘ΠEPI ΠAΘΩN’, Corpus latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem graecorum, suppl. 2 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1975) ‘Protagorean relativism and the Cyrenaics’, in Rescher, N., ed., Studies in Epistemology (Oxford) 113–40.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1980) ‘Epicurus and the pleasure principle’, in Depew, D. J., ed. (1980) The Greeks and the Good Life (Indianapolis) 177–97.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1983a) ‘Skeptic semiotics’, Phronesis 28, 213–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1983b) ‘Epicurean semantics’, in De anatomicis administrationibus. VV. (1983) 185–226.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. K. (1985) ‘Epicurean prolēpsis’, OSAP 3, 175–217.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy, Hypomnemata 56 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Πρòζτòν ∊ιπóντα – Sources and credibility of De Stoicorum repugnantiis 8’, ICS 13, 473–89.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1991) ‘Images of Plato in late antiquity’, in Unguru, S., ed., Physics, Cosmology and Astronomy, 1300–1700: Tension and Accommodation, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 126 (Dordrecht) 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedeckemeyer, A. (1905) Die Geschichte des Griechischen Skeptizismus (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Goetz, G. (1894) ‘Aelius (144)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 1, cols. 532–3.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. (1972) ‘πάρξ∊iν et ὑφ∊στἁνα dans la philosophie stoïcienne’, REG 85, 331–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. (1977) La doctrine d'Epicure et le droit (Paris).Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. (1979) Le système stoïcien et l'idée de temps, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1899) ‘Platonische Aufsätze, II’, SAWW, Philos.-hist. Kl. 144.7.Google Scholar
Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothobutgensia 61 (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (1983) ‘Oikeiôsis in Arius Didymus’, in Fortenbaugh (1983) 165–89.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1977) ‘Aσθ∊νς συγκατάθ∊σιζ, zur stoischen Erkenntinis theorie’, WJA NF 3, 83–92.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1985) (rev. Decleva Caizzi 1981a) AGPh 67, 320–35.
Görler, W. (1989) 'Cicero und die “Schule des Aristoteles”, in Fortenbaugh & Steinmetz (1989) 246–63.Google Scholar
Görler, W. & Gawlick, G. (1994) ‘6. Cicero’, in Flashar (1994) 991–1168.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1994b) ‘Älterer Pyrrhonismus, Jüngere Akademie, Antiochos aus Askalon’, Flashar (1994) 717–989.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. (1987) ‘The Stoics and ακρασια’, Apeiron 20, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, J. & Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B., ed. (1965) Strato of Lampsacus: Some Texts, Edited with a Commentary, Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Lit. and Hist. Sect. (11.6) 95–182.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1967) (rev. Steinmetz 1964) Gnomon 39, 17–26.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1972) ‘Notes on the wills of the peripatetic scholarchs’, Hermes 100, 314–342.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1980) Heraclides of Pontus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century ad’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11.36.2 (Berlin/New York) 1079–174.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1992) ‘An errant fragment of Theophrastus’, CQ 42, 529–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudriaan, K. (1988) ‘Van eerste naar tweede sofistiek’, in Slings, S. R. & Sluiter, I., edd., Ophelos (Amsterdam) 20–39.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, K. (1989) ‘Over Classicisme. Dionysius van Halicarnassus en zijn program van welsprekendheid, cultuur en politiek’, 2 vols. (dissertation Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1978) ‘La classification stoïcienne des propositions simples’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 171–98.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1989) ‘Aulu Gelle’, in Goulet, (1989–94) 1, 675–87.
Goulet, R., ed. (1989–94) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vols. 1–11 (Paris).Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1997) ‘Les références chez Diogène Laërce: sources ou autorités?’, in Fredouille, J.-C. et al., edd., Titres et articulations du textes dans les oeuvres antiques (Paris) 149–66.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1982) ‘Un syllogisme stoïcien sur la loi dans la doxographie de Diogène le Cynique. A propos de Diogène Laërce VI 72’, RhM 125, 214–40.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1986) L’ascèse cynique: un commentaire de Diogène Laerce VI 70–1 (Paris).Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1992) ‘Le livre VI de Diogène Laërce: analyse de sa structure et réflexions méthodologiques’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3880–4048.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1972) ‘Zirkel oder Deduktion? Zur Begründung der stoischen Ethik’, Kant-Studien 63, 213–24.Google Scholar
Graeser, A., ed. (1973) Die Logischen Fragmente des Theophrast (Berlin).Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1975) Zenon von Kition, Positionen und Probleme (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. W., ed. (1995) Gregory Vlastos, Studies in Greek Philosophy, vol. 11: Socrates, , Plato, , and their Tradition (Princeton 1995).Google Scholar
Gregorio, L. di, ed. (1975) Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Theogoniam, Scienze filologiche e letteratura 6 (Milan).Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca, a Philosopher in Politics (Oxford).Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1986) ‘Philosophy, Cato and Roman suicide’, G & R 33, 64–77, 192–202.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. & Barnes, J., edd. (1989) Philosophia togata. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society (Oxford).Google Scholar
Grilli, A. (1963) ‘Zenone e Antigono 11’, RFIC 91, 287–301.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. repr. in Stoicismo, Epicureismo, Letteratura (Brescia 1992) 405–18.Google Scholar
Groarke, L. (1990) Greek Scepticism – Anti-Realist Trends in Ancient Thought (Montreal).Google Scholar
Grube, G. A. (1965) The Greek and Roman Critics (London).Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1975) Greek Wisdom Literature in Arabic Translation: A Study of the Graeco-Arabic Gnomologia, American Oriental Series 60 (New Haven).Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962–1981) A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. (Cambridge, later repr.).Google Scholar
Guyau, M. (1910) La morale d'Epicure et ses rapports avec les doctrines contemporaines, 5th edn (Paris).Google Scholar
Habicht, Chr. (1989) ‘Athen und die Seleukiden’, Chiron 19, 7–26; repr. in id. (1994).Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969a) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleiting, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969b) ‘Epicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé, 347–53 (1968).Google Scholar
Hadot, I., ed. (1990) Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories, fasc. 1: Introduction, première partie (p. 1–9, 3 Kalbfleisch). Traduction de Ph. Hoffmann (avec la collaboration d' I. et P. Hadot), Commentaire et notes à la traduction par I. Hadot, PhA 50 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1991) ‘The role of the commentaries on Aristotle in the teaching of philosophy according to the prefaces of the Neoplatonic commentaries on the Categories’, in Blumenthal, H. & Robinson, H., edd., Aristotle and the Later Tradition, OSAP, suppl. vol. (Oxford) 175–89.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1957) ‘De lectis non lecta conponere (Marius Victorinus, adversus Arrium II 7): Raisonnement théologique et raisonnement juridique’, in Aland, K. & Cross, F. C., edd., Studia patristica 1, Texte und Untersuchungen 63 (Berlin) 209–20.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1969) ‘Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs “Existenz”, άπὑρξ∊ιν, bei den Stoikern’, AGP 13 (1969) 115–27.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1979) ‘Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l'antiquité’, Museum Helveticum 36, 201–23.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1980) ‘Sur divers sens du mot pragma dans la tradition philosophique grecque’, in Aubenque, (1980) 309–19.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1987) ‘Théologie, exégèse, révélation, écriture dans la philosophie grecque’, in Tardieu, (1987) 13–34.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1991) Philosophie als Lebensform, Geistige Übungen in der Antike (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1958) Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome and Other Christian Writers (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 20 (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Hager, P. (1982) ‘Chrysippus' theory of pneuma’, Prudentia 14, 97–108.Google Scholar
Hagius, H. (1979) ‘The Stoic theory of the parts of speech’ (dissertation Columbia).Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1972) ‘Chrysippus' solution to the Democritean dilemma of the cone’, Isis 63, 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1977) The Origins of Stoic Cosmology (Columbus Ohio).Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1985) ‘The Stoic theory of change’, in Epp (1985) 39–56.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1990) ‘The ethical doxography of Arius Didymus’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 2935–3055.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1991) ‘Aristotle and the Stoics: a methodological crux’, AGPh 73, 297–311.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius VII: On the Stoics’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.6 (Berlin/New York) 4076–182.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. E. (1995) ‘Polybius' applied political theory’, in Laks, & Schofield, (1995) 7–47.Google Scholar
Hammerstaedt, J. (1992) ‘Der Schlussteil von Philodems drittem Buch über Rhetorik’, CErc 22, 9–117.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1987a) ‘Evidence, externality and antecedence: inquiries into later Greek causal concepts’, Phronesis 32, 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1987b) ‘Causes and empiricism: a problem in the interpretation of later Greek medical method’, Phronesis 32, 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1988a) ‘Galen explains the elephant’, in Matthen, & Linsky, (1988b) 135–58.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1988b) ‘Stoicism, science, and divination’, in Hankinson, (1988c) 123–60.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J., ed. (1988c) Method, Medicine and Metaphysics, Studies in the Philosophy of Ancient Science, Apeiron suppl. vol. 21 (Edmonton).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1989) ‘Galen and the best of all possible worlds’, CQ 39, 206–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hankinson, R. J. (1990) ‘Saying the phenomena’, Phronesis 35, 194–215 (critical notice of von Staden 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991) Galen on the Therapeutic Method, Books 1 and 11 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1992) ‘Galen's philosophical eclecticism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3505–22.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1993) ‘Actions and passions: affection, emotion, and moral self-management in Galen's philosophical psychology’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) 184–222.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics (London).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Galen on Antecedent Causes (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Harder, R. (1960) ‘Quelle oder Tradition?’, in Les Sources de Plotin, Fondation Hardt 5 (Vandœuvres/Genève) 325–32.Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. (1965) ‘The final good in Aristotle's ethics’, Philosophy 40, 277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. (1968) Aristotle's Ethical Theory (Oxford).Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. S. (1973) The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine from Alcmaeon to Galen (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. (1983) Lectures on the History of Philosophy, transl. Haldane, E. S. & Simson, F. H. (repr. London/New Jersey 1983).Google Scholar
Heil, J. (1992) The Nature of True Minds (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, O. (1869) ‘Kritische Beiträge zum siebenten Buche des Laertios Diogenes’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie 99, 611–28.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1974) ‘Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie im PHerc. 1428’, CErc 4, 5–32.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1975) ‘Two doxographical notes: Democritus and Prodicus on religion’, HSPh 79, 93–123.Google Scholar
Herbermann, C.-P. (1991) ‘Antike Etymologie’, in Schmitter, (1991) 353–76.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. (1992a) ‘Plutarch and Stoicism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3336–52.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. (1992b) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3353–83.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D., ed. (1925) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, LCL, 2 vols. (London/Cambridge, Mass.; various repr.).Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. & Remes, U. (1974) The Method of Analysis, Its Geometrical Origin and its General Significance (Dordrecht/Boston).Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1877–83) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros philosophischen Schriften, 3 vols. in 4 (Leipzig; repr. Hildesheim 1964).Google Scholar
Hobein, H. (1929) ‘Sphairos (3)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 3.a, cols. 1683–93.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, H. M. & Wiener, L. F., edd. (1987) Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höistad, R. (1948) Cynic Hero and Cynic King: Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man (Uppsala).Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1985) Die Philosophie der Antike 3: Stoa, Epikureismus und Skepsis (Munich).Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1988) ‘Epicurus-hedonist malgré lui’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a) 245–63.Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1991a) Epikur (Munich).Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1991b) ‘Epikureer’, in Schmitter, (1991) 217–37.Google Scholar
Hoven, R. (1971) Stoïcisme et stoïciens face au problème de l'au-delà, Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l' Université de Liège, fasc. 197 (Paris).Google Scholar
Huby, P. M. (1967) ‘The first discovery of the freewill problem’, Philosophy 42, 353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. M. (1978) ‘Epicurus' attitude to Democritus’, Phronesis, 23, 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. M. & Neal, G. C., edd. (1989) The Criterion of Truth, Essays written in honour of George Kerferd (Liverpool).Google Scholar
Hülser, K.-H. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. (Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt).Google Scholar
Hülser, K.-H. (1992) ‘Sextus Empiricus und die Stoiker’, Elenchos 13, 233–76.Google Scholar
Humbert, J. (1967) Socrate et les Petits Socratiques (Paris).Google Scholar
Hunt, H. A. K. (1976) A Physical Interpretation of the Universe. The Doctrines of Zeno the Stoic (Melbourne).Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (1990) ‘The beginnings of epistemology: from Homer to Philolaus’, in Everson, (1990a) 11–38.Google Scholar
Ide, H. A. (1992) ‘Chrysippus's response to Diodorus's Master Argument’, History and Philosophy of Logic 13, 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1990) ‘Analysis in Stoic logic’ (dissertation London).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993a) ‘The Stoic indemonstrables in the later tradition’, in Döring, & Ebert, (1993) 187–200.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993b) ‘The Stoic division of philosophy’, Phronesis 38, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K., ed. (1999) Topics in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Immisch, O. (1928) ‘Wirklichkeit und Literaturform’, RhM 78, 113–23.Google Scholar
Indelli, G., ed. (1978) Polistrato: Sul disprezzo irrazionale delle opinioni popolari (Naples).Google Scholar
Indelli, G. & Tsouna-McKirahan, V. (1995) Philodemus: On Choices and Avoidances (Naples).Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1989) ‘Philodemus’, in Kennedy, (1989) 215–19.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1981) ‘The origin of Epicurus' concept of void’, CPh 76, 273–85.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984) ‘Hierocles. Theory and argument in the second century ad’, OSAP 2, 151–84.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Oxford).Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1986) (rev. Asmis 1984) CPh 81, 349–54.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1991) ‘Chrysippus on extension & the void’, RIPh 3, 245–66.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1993) ‘Seneca and psychological dualism’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) 150–83.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1995) (rev. Annas 1993a) AncPhil 15, 647–65.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. & Mansfeld, J., edd. (1997) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books, Proceedings of the 7th Symposium Hellenisticum (Utrecht, August 21–25, 1995), PhA 76 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1980a) Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico, Elenchos 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1980b) ‘Anassarco e il cinismo’, in Romano, (1980) 499–506.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1985a) ‘L'astrologia nello stoicismo antico’, in Giannantoni, & Vegetti, (1985) 73–92.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1985b) ‘Lo stoicismo di Erillo’, Phronesis 30, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienza: il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel III e nel II secolo a. C., Elenchos 12 (Naples).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1990) ‘Presentation and assent: a physical and cognitive problem in early Stoicism’, CQ 40, 433–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1992) ‘Sesto Empirico e l'Accademia scettica’, Elenchos 13, 169–200.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (1994) ‘Les éditions de textes’, in Montanari, (1994), 39–82.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1986) ‘Stoic and Aristotelian conceptions of happiness’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a) 205–44.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1974a (1983)) Opere di Epicuro, Classici UTET (Turin; repr. 1983).Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1974b) ‘Carattere e struttura dell'Accademia antica’, in Zeller, E. & Mondolfo, R.La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, a cura di M. Isnardi Parente (Florence) vol. 111.2, 861–77.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1980) ‘Stoici, Epicurei, e il “motus sine causa”’, RSF 35, 23–31.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1985–6) ‘Filosofia postaristotelica o filosofia ellenistica: storia di un concetto storiografico’, Annali dell'Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 9, 165–93.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1986) ‘L'Accademia antica: interpretazioni recenti e problemi di metodo’, RFIC 114, 350–78.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1987) ‘Una poetica di incerto autore in Filodemo’, in Filologia e forme letterarie, Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte (Urbino) v 81–98.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1992) ‘Sesto, Platone, l'Accademia antica e i Pitagorici’, Elenchos 13, 120–68.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. (1920) ‘Aristotle's lecture-room and lectures’, JPh 35, 191–200.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1902) Apollodors Chronik: eine Sammlung der Fragmente (Berlin; repr. New York 1973).Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1991) ‘Philodemus' On poems and Aristotle's On poets’, CErc 21, 5–64.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1995) ‘Reconstructing Philodemus' On poems’, in Obbink, (1995) 69–96.Google Scholar
Jerphagnon, L., Lagrée, J. & Delattre, D., edd. (1994) Ainsi parlaient les Anciens: In honorem Jean-Paul Dumont (Lille).Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1976/7) ‘The ruling class of the Roman republic and Greek philosophers’, BRL 59, 323–66.Google Scholar
Joly, R. (1956) Le Thème Philosophique des Genres de Vie dans l'Antiquité Classique (Brussels).Google Scholar
Jones, H. (1989) The Epicurean Tradition (London/New York).Google Scholar
Joosen, J. C. & Waszink, J. H. (1950) ‘Allegorese’, in RAC Bd. 1 (Stuttgart) 283–93.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (1990) ‘The abandonment of nomos in Greek linguistic thought’, HL 17, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Ch. (1983) ‘Arius as a doxographer’, in Fortenbaugh (1983) 3–14.Google Scholar
Kahn, Ch. (1985) ‘Democritus and the origins of moral psychology’, AJPh 106, 1–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Kahn, Ch. (1988) ‘Discovering the will: from Aristotle to Augustine’, in Dillon & Long (1988) 234–59.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1991) ‘Der Peripatetiker Prytanis’, in Nesselrath, H.-G., ed., Kleine Schriften (Berlin/New York) 351–2.Google Scholar
Kattenbusch, F. (1930) ‘Die Entstehung einer christlichen Theologie. Zur Geschichte der Ausdrücke θ∊oλoγια, θ∊oλoγ∊ĩν, θ∊oλóγoς’, Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche N. F. 11, 161–205.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. (1991) ‘The emergence of autonomous Greek grammar’, in Schmitter (1991) 302–33.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., ed. (1989a) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 1: Classical Criticism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1989b) ‘Hellenistic literary and philosophical scholarship’, in Kennedy, (1989a) 200–14.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1994a) ‘Peripatetic rhetoric as it appears (and disappears) in Quintilian’, in Fortenbaugh & Mirhady (1994) 174–82.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1994b) A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton N.J.).Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1972) ‘The historical imagination of Lucretius’, G&R 19, 12–24.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1992) Aristotle on the Perfect Life (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1971) ‘Epicurus’ doctrine of the soul’, Phronesis 16, 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1972) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, BRL 55, 177–96.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1978a) ‘What does the wise man know?’, in Rist (1978b) 125–36.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1978b) ‘The problem of synkatathesis and katalepsis’, in Brunschwig (1978a) 251–72.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1978c) ‘The origin of evil in Stoic thought’, BRL 60, 482–94.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1971) ‘Stoic intermediates and the end for man’, in Long (1971a) 150–72.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. repr. from CQ 5 (1955) 181–94.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1971a) ‘Posidonius on emotions’, in Long (1971a) 200–15.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1978a) ‘Philosophy and science in Posidonius’, A & A 24, 7–15.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1978b) ‘Posidonius and logic’, in Brunschwig (1978a) 273–83.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1978c) ‘Moral actions and rules in Stoic ethics’, in Rist (1978b) 247–58.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1983) ‘Euemptosia – proneness to disease’, in Fortenbaugh (1983) 107–13.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius, II: The Commentary, 2 vols., Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 14 A & B (Cambridge) (vol. I see Edelstein & Kidd 1972).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1989) ‘Orthos logos as a criterion of truth in the Stoa’, in Huby & Neal (1989) 137–50.Google Scholar
Kienle, W. von (1961) Die Berichte über die Sukzessionen der Philosophen in der hellenistischen und spätantiken Literatur (Berlin).Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1976) Bion of Borysthenes: A Collection of the Fragments with Introduction and Commentary, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Graeca Upsaliensia 11 (Uppsala).Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the chreia tradition’, in Giannantoni (1986) 217–44.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F., ed. (1991) Gnomica Basileensia, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Byzantina Upsaliensia 2 (Uppsala/Stockholm).Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1955) ‘Some problems in Anaximander’, CQ 5, 21–38.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. repr. in Furley, D. J. & Allen, R. E., edd. (1970) Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, vol. I (London) 323–49.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1963) Gnosis Theon. Die Lehre von der natürlichen Gotteserkenntnis in der epikureischen Theologie. Ausgangspunkt der Studie: Cicero, De natura deorum I, SO suppl. 19 (Oslo).Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1979) ‘The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation’, SO 54, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleve, K. (1980) ‘Id facit exiguum clinamen’, SO 55, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleve, K. (1983) ‘Scurra Atticus. The Epicurean view of Socrates’, in AA. VV. (1983) I 227–53.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. (1989) ‘Lucretius in Herculaneum’, CErc 19, 5–27.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. & Kneale, M. (1962) The Development of Logic (Oxford; repr. with corr. 1975, 1986).Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. (1991) La Vie de Ménédème d'Erétrie de Diogène Laërce. Contribution à l'histoire et à la critique du texte des Vies des philosophes, Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 21 (Basle).Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. (1995) ‘Les relations des cités Eubéennes avec Antigone Gonatas et la chronologie delphique au début de l'époque étolienne’, BCH 119, 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1976) The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: a Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and its Significance for Early Greek Geometry (Dordrecht).Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1982) ‘Infinity and continuity. The interaction of mathematics and philosophy in antiquity’, in Kretzmann, N., ed., Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought (Ithaca/London) 112–45.Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems (Boston/Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R. (1989) Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry (Boston/Basle/Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, K. (1987) ‘On Schleicher and trees’, in Hoenigswald & Wiener (1987) 109–13.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. (1966) ‘Zur Geschichte des medizinischen Lehrbuchs in der Antike’, in Blaser, R. & Buess, H., edd., Aktuelle Probleme aus der Geschichte der Medizin (Basle/New York).Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. (1973) Untersuchungen zu den pseudogalenischenDefinitiones medicae, Schriften zur Geschichte und Kultur der Antike 7 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. & Nickel, D., edd. (1993) Galen und das hellenistische Erbe, Sudhoffs Archiv Beih. 32 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1972) ‘Epicurus on “up” & “down” (Letter to Herodotus § 60)’, Phronesis 17, 269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1973) Some Aspects of Epicurean Psychology (Leiden).Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1979) ‘Problems in Epicurean physics’, Isis, 70, 394–418; repr. in Anton & Preuss (1983) 431–64.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1982) ‘Ancient atomism and its heritage: minimal parts’, AncPhil 2, 60–75.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1971) Platonismus und Hellenistische Philosophie (Berlin/New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1980) ‘Epikur und die hedonistische Tradition’, Gymnasium 87, 294–326.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1983) ‘Die ältere Akademie’, in Flashar (1983) 1–174.Google Scholar
Kraus, H.-J. (1982) Geschichte der historisch-kritischen Erforschung des Alten Testaments (Neukirschen-Vluyn, 3rd edn).Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (1987) Name und Sache: Ein Problem im frühgriechischen Denken, Studien zur antiken Philosophie 14 (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1993) Greek Philosophers of the Hellenistic Age (New York), transl. of Filosofi greci dell' età ellenistica (Pisa 1991).Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1940) ‘Rhetorik’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie Suppl. 7, cols. 1039–138.Google Scholar
Krumme, L. (1941) Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie in Ciceros Schrift De natura deorum (Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
Küchler, M. (1979) Frühjüdische Weisheitstraditionen, Orbis biblicus et orientalis 26 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1964) ‘Herophilos und der Beginn der medizinischen Skepsis’, Gesnerus 21, 1–13, repr. in Flashar, H., ed. (1971) Antike Medizin, Wege der Forschung221 (Darmstadt) 280–95.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1969) ‘Antike Anatomie und menschlicher Leichnam’, Hermes 97, 78–94.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1989) ‘Hippokrates-Rezeption im Hellenismus’, in Baader, G. & Winau, R., edd., Die Hippokratischen Epidemien. Theorie – Praxis – Tradition, Sudhoffs Archiv Beih. 27 (Stuttgart) 355–76.Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G. (1970) Das Neue Testament, Geschichte der Erforschung seiner Probleme (Freiburg/Munich, orig. edn 1958).Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G., ed. (1993) Plutarque: Œuvres morales, T. 12.2: Opinions des philosophes (Paris).Google Scholar
Laffranque, M. (1964) Poseidonios d'Apamée, Essai de mise au point (Paris).Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1976) ‘Edition critique commentée de la “Vie d'Epicure” dans Diogène Laërce (x, 1–34)’, in Bollack & Laks (1976) 1–118.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1983) Diogène d'Apollonie: La dernière cosmologie présocratique, Cahiers de Philologie 9 (Lille).Google Scholar
Laks, A. & Most, G. W., edd. (1993a) Théophraste: Métaphysique (Paris).Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1993b) ‘Annicéris et les plaisirs psychiques. Quelques préalables doxographiques’, in Brunschwig & Nussbaum (1993) 18–49.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1996) ‘Du témoignage comme fragment’, in Most (1996) 273–88.Google Scholar
Laks, A. & Schofield, M., edd. (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamberton, R. & Keaney, J. J., edd. (1992) Homer's Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic'sEarliest Exegetes (Princeton).Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. (1974) Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart, Bd. 1: Geschichte des Materialismus bis auf Kant (Iserlohn 1866, 11 1921; repr. Frankfurt A. M. 1974 with introd. by Schmidt, A.).Google Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1973) ‘Archai and stoicheia: a problem in Stoic cosmology’, Phronesis 18, 240–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidge, M. (1978) ‘Stoic cosmology’, in Rist (1978) 161–86.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. (1987) ‘Epicurus, On nature Book xxv’, CErc 17, 77–8.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. (1988) ‘Epicurus On nature xxv (Long-Sedley 20, B, C and J)’, CErc 18, 7–18.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. (1995) ‘The early parts of Epicurus, On nature, 25th book’, CErc 25, 5–109.Google Scholar
Lausberg, M. (1970) Untersuchungen zu Senecas Fragmenten, Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 7 (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebedev, A. (1984) ‘ΦÚσις ταλαντ∊Úoυσα. Neglected fragments of Democritus and Metrodorus of Chios’, Proceedings of the Ist International Congress on Democritus (Xanthi) vol. 2, 13–8.Google Scholar
Lee, Tae-Soo (1984) Die Griechische Tradition der Aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike: eine Untersuchung über die Kommentare zu den Analytica Prioravon Alexander Aphrodisiensis, Ammonius und Philoponus, Hypomnemata 79 (Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, A. D. & Pinkster, H. (1981) M. Tullius Cicero: De Oratore libri III. Kommentar, 1. Bd.: Buch I, 1–165 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Lefèvre, F. (1995) ‘La chronologie du IIIe siècle à Delphes, d'après les actes amphictioniques (280–200)’, 161–208.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1981) The Lives of the Greek Poets (London).Google Scholar
Lemke, D. (1973) Die Theologie Epikurs: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion, Zetemata 57 (Munich).Google Scholar
Lennox, J. (1985) ‘Theophrastus on the limits of teleology’, in Fortenbaugh et al. (1985) 143–63.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1901) Die Griechisch-Römische Biographie nach ihrer literarischen Form (Leipzig; repr. Darmstadt 1965).Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1978) ‘Xenophanes’ scepticism’, Phronesis 23, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (1978) ‘Scepticisme et dogmatisme dans l'Académie: “l'ésotéricisme de Arcésilas”’, REL 56, 335–48.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1990) ‘Platon, Arcésilas, Carnéade — Réponse à J. Annas’, RMM 95, 293–306.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus, Recherches sur les Académiqueset sur la philosophie cicéronienne (Rome).Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1993) ‘Le concept de doxa des Stoïciens à Philon d' Alexandrie: essai d' étude diachronique’, in Brunschwig & Nussbaum (1993) 250–84.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1996) ‘Doxographie et philosophie chez Cicéron’, in id., ed., Le concept de nature à Rome. La physique (Paris) 109–23.Google Scholar
Lilla, S. R. C. (1970) Clement of Alexandria: A Study in Christian Platonism and Gnosticism (Oxford).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1971) ‘Grammar and metaphysics in the Stoa’, in Long (1971a) 58–74.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1978a) ‘Emotion and decision in Stoic psychology’, in Rist (1978) pp. 233–46.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1978b) ‘Definite propositions and the concept of reference’, in Brunschwig (1978a) 285–96.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1964) ‘Experiment in early Greek philosophy and medicine’, PCPhS n.s. 10, 50–72; repr. in Lloyd, (1991a) 70–99.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1975) ‘A note on Erasistratus of Ceos’, JHS 95, 172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1983) Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991a) Methods and Problems in Greek Science (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991b) ‘Galen on Hellenistics and Hippocrateans: contemporary battles and past authorities’, in Lloyd, (1991a) 398–416; also pr. in Kollesch & Nickel (1993) 157–64 (125–43).Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. & Parsons, P., edd. (1981) Supplementum Hellenisticum (Berlin).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1967) ‘Carneades and the Stoic telos’, Phronesis 12, 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1968) ‘Aristotle's legacy to Stoic ethics’, BICS 15, 72–85.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1970–1) ‘The logical basis of Stoic ethics’, PAS 71, 85–104; repr. in Long, (1996) 134–55.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., ed. (1971a) Problems in Stoicism (London; repr. 1996).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971b) ‘Freedom and determinism in the Stoic theory of human action’, in Long, (1971a) 173–99.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971c) ‘Language and thought in Stoicism’, in Long, (1971a) 75–113.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971d) ‘Aisthesis, prolepsis and linguistic theory in Epicurus’, BICS 18, 114–33.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1974) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (London; 2nd edn, Berkeley 1986).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1975–6) ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, Philosophia 5/6, 133–56; repr. in Long, (1996) 35–57.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1976) ‘The early Stoic concept of moral choice’, in Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Studies Presented to G. Verbeke (Leuven) 77–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1977) ‘Chance and natural law in Epicureanism’, Phronesis 22, 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978a) ‘Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and satirist’, PCPhS 204 (n.s. 24) 68–91.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978b) ‘The Stoic distinction between truth and the true’, in Brunschwig (1978a) 297–316.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978c) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in Rist (1978b) 101–24; repr. in Long, (1996) 85–106.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1981) ‘Aristotle and the history of Greek scepticism’, in O'Meara (1981) 79–106.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1982a) ‘Astrology: arguments pro and contra’, in Barnes et al. (1982a) 165–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1982b) ‘Soul and body in Stoicism’, Phronesis 27 (1982) 34–57; repr. in Long, (1996) 224–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1983a) ‘Arius Didymus and the exposition of Stoic ethics’, in Fortenbaugh (1983) 41–66; repr. in Long (1996) 107–33.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1983b) ‘Greek ethics after MacIntyre and the Stoic community of reason’, AncPhil 3, 184–99; repr. in Long, (1996) 156–78.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1985) ‘The Stoics on world-conflagration and everlasting recurrence’, in Epp (1985) 13–37.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986a) ‘Diogenes Laertius, life of Arcesilaus’, in Giannantoni (1986a) 429–49.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986b) ‘Pleasure and social utility – the virtues of being Epicurean’, in Flashar & Gigon (1986) 283–316.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988a) ‘Stoic eudaimonism’, in Cleary & Shartin (1988) 77–101; repr. in Long, (1996) 179–201.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988b) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, CQ 38, 150–71; repr. in Long, (1996) 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988c) ‘Reply to Jonathan Barnes, “Epicurean Signs”’, OSAP, suppl. vol., 135–44.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988d) (rev. Asmis 1984) PhR 97, 249–51.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1990) ‘Scepticism about Gods in Hellenistic philosophy’, in Griffith, M. & Mastronarde, D. J., edd., Cabinet of the Muses, Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer (Atlanta) 279–91.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1991a) ‘Representation and the self in Stoicism’, in Everson (1991a) 102–20; repr. in Long, (1996) 264–85.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1991b) ‘The harmonics of Stoic virtue’, OSAP, suppl. vol. 1991, 97–116; repr. in Long, (1996) 202–23.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1992) ‘Stoic readings of Homer’, in Lamberton, & Keaney, (1992) 41–66; repr. in Long, (1996) 58–84.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1993a) ‘Hellenistic ethics and philosophical power’, in Green, P., ed., Hellenistic History and Culture (Berkeley/Los Angeles) 138–56.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1993b) ‘Hierocles on oikeiosis and self-perception’, in Boudouris, K., ed., Hellenistic Philosophy (Athens) 93–102; repr. in Long, (1996) 250–63.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) Stoic Studies (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1997) ‘Theophrastus and the Stoa’, in Ophuijsen, & Raalte, (1997) 357–85.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (1978) ‘La scuola di Epicuro’, CErc 8, 21–37.Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F., ed. (1988) Ermarco: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 6 (Naples).Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. & Tepedino Guerra, A. (1981) ‘Aspetti e problemi della dissidenza epicurea’, CErc 11, 25–40.Google Scholar
Lonie, I. M. (1964) ‘Erasistratus, the Erasistrateans, and Aristotle’, BHM 38, 426–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Luria, S. (1932) ‘Die Infinitesimaltheorie des antiken Atomisten’, QGM, B 2, 106–85.Google Scholar
Luschnat, O. (1958) ‘Das Problem des ethischen Fortschritts in der alten Stoa’, Philologus 102, 178–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. P. (1972) Aristotle’s School. A History of a Greek Educational Institution (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Maccoll, N. (1869) The Greek Sceptics from Pyrrho to Sextus (London).Google Scholar
MacKendrick, P. (1989) The Philosophical Books of Cicero (London; repr. 1995).Google Scholar
MacKim, R. (1984) ‘Democritus against Scepticism: all sense-impressions are true’, in Proceedings of the Ist International Congress on Democritus (Xanthi) vol. 1, 281–90.Google Scholar
Maconi, H. (1988) ‘Nova non philosophandi philosophia’, OSAP 6, 231–53.Google Scholar
Malaparte, C. (1929) ‘Ritratto di Pirrone’, Pegaso 1, 44–7.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. (1986) ‘Note di lettura dell’Anonimo Londinese – Prolegomena ad una nuova edizione’, ZPE 63, 57–74.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. (1994) ‘Autografi e incompiuti: il caso dell'Anonimo Londinese P. Lit. Lond. 165’, ZPE 100, 47–58.Google Scholar
Manetti, G., ed. (1995) Knowledge through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices (Turnhout).Google Scholar
Mangoni, C., ed. (1993) Filodemo, Il quinto libro della Poetica (PHerc. 1425 e 1538), La scuola di Epicuro 14 (Naples).Google Scholar
Mannebach, E., ed. (1961) Aristippi et Cyrenaicorum Fragmenta (Leiden/Cologne).Google Scholar
Manolidis, G. (1987) Die Rolle der Physiologie in der Philosophie Epikurs, Monographien zur philosophischen Forschung 241 (Frankfurt a.M.).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1978) ‘Zeno of Citium’, Mnemosyne 31, 134–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the destruction of the universe in early Stoic thought’, in Vermaseren, M. J., ed., Studies in Hellenistic Religions, EPRO 78 (Leiden) 129–88; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1981) ‘Protagoras on epistemological obstacles and persons’, in Kerferd, G. B., ed., The Sophists and their Legacy, Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy, Hermes Einzelschr. 44 (Wiesbaden) 38–53.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983a) ‘Intuitionism and formalism: Zeno's definition of geometry in a fragment of L. Calvenus Taurus’, Phronesis 28, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983b) ‘Techne: a new fragment of Chrysippus’, GRBS 24, 57–65; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study III.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius on Stoic philosophy’, in Giannantoni, (1986a) 295–382; repr. in Mansfeld, (1990b) 343–428.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1988a) ‘Philosophy in the service of Scripture: Philo's exegetical strategies’, in Dillon, & Long, (1988) 70–102; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989b) study x.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1988b) (rev. Goulet-Cazé 1986) CR 38, 162–3.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1989a) ‘Gibt es Spuren von Theophrasts Physica op. bei Cicero?’, in Fortenbaugh, & Steinmetz, (1989) 133–58; repr. in Mansfeld, (1990b) 238–63.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1989b) Studies in Later Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism, Variorum Collected Studies Series 292 (London).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1989c) ‘Chrysippus and the Placita’, Phronesis 34, 311–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990a) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the “Placita”’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.4 (Berlin/New York) 3056–229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990b) Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy (Assen/Maastricht).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992a) Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus' Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy, PhA 56 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992b) ‘A Theophrastean excursus on God and nature and its aftermath in Hellenistic thought’, Phronesis 37, 314–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992c) ‘Physikai doxai and problemata physika from Aristotle to Aëtius (and beyond)’, in Fortenbaugh, & Gutas, (1992) 63–111.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992d) ‘The idea of the will in Chrysippus, Posidonius, and Galen’, in Cleary, & Wians, (1992) 107–45.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1993) ‘Aspects of Epicurean theology’, Mnemosyne 46, 172–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994a) ‘Epicurus peripateticus’, in Alberti, A., ed., Realtà e ragione, Studi di filosofia antica (Florence) 29–47.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994b) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text, PhA 61 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1995) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academics’ in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Festschrift I. G. Kidd, RUSCH vol. vii (New Brunswick/London) 235–47.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1998) ‘Doxographical studies, Quellenforschung, tabular presentation, and other varieties of comparativism’, in Burkert, et al. (1998) 16–40.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. & Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. I: The Sources, PhA 73 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs, Habelts Dissertationsdrucke, Reihe klassische Philologie 15 (Bonn).Google Scholar
Manuwald, B. (1980) Der Aufbau der Lukrezischen Kulturentstehungslehre, AAWM, Geistes- und sozialwiss. Klasse 1980.3 (Mainz/Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Marco, M. di, ed. (1989) Timone di Fliunte: Silli, Testi e commenti 10 (Rome).Google Scholar
Marelli, C. (1981) ‘La medicina empirica ed il suo sistema epistemologico’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) II, 657–76.
Maróth, M. (1989) Ibn Sina und die Peripatetische ‘Aussagenlogik’, Islamic Philosophy and Theology 6 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1980) ‘Il mentitore nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni logiche di Crisippo)’, in Proceed. XVIII Intern. Congr. Papyrology (Athens) 1, 271–6.Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1982) ‘Nuove letture nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni Logiche di Crisippo)’, CErc 12, 13–18.Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1984) ‘Proposizione e predicato in Crisippo’, CErc 14, 135–46.Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1992) ‘L'ambiguità verbale nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni logiche di Crisippo)’, in Proceed. XIX Intern. Congr. Papyrology (Cairo) 1, 261–7.Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1993) ‘Gnoseologia stoica nel PHerc. 307’, in Franchi dell’Orto, L., ed., Ercolano 1738–1988. 250 anni di ricerca archeologica (Rome) 339–41.Google Scholar
Marrone, L. (1997) ‘Le questioni logichi di Crisippo (PHerc 307)’, Cronache Ercolanesi 27, 83–100.Google Scholar
Martini, E. (1899) ‘Analecta laertiana’, pt. 1, Leipziger Studien zur classischen Philologie 19, 73–177.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1961) Stoic Logic, University of California Publications in Philosophy 26 2nd edn (Berkeley; microfilm repr. Ann Arbor 1992).Google Scholar
Matthen, M., ed. (1987) Aristotle Today — Essays on Aristotle's Ideal of Science (Edmonton).Google Scholar
Matthen, M. (1988a) ‘Empiricism and ontology in ancient medicine’, in Hankinson, (1988c) 98–121.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. & Linsky, B., edd. (1988b) Philosophy and Biology. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 14 (Alberta).Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. (1986) ‘Scipio Aemilianus' eastern embassy’, CQ NS 36, 491–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, J. (1954a) Zum Problem des Infinitesimalen bei den Antiken Atomisten (Berlin).Google Scholar
Mau, J. (1954b) ‘Raum und Bewegung: zu Epikurs Brief an Herodot § 60’, Hermes 82, 13–24.Google Scholar
Mau, J., ed. (1971) Plutarchi Moralia, vol. v 2.1: x oratorum vitae; Placita philosophorum, Bibl. teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Mau, J. (1973) ‘Was there a special Epicurean mathematics?’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D. & Rorty, R. M., edd., Exegesis and Argument. Studies presented to Gregory Vlastos (Assen) 421–30.Google Scholar
Mauro, T. De & Formigaro, L., edd. (1990) Leibniz, Humboldt and the Origins of Comparativism (Amsterdam/Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J., ed. (1973) Plato: Theaetetus (Oxford).Google Scholar
McDowell, J. H. (1980) ‘Physicalism and primitive denotation: Field on Tarski’, in Platts, M., ed., Reference, Truth and Reality (London) 111–30; first published in Erkenntnis 13 (1978) 131–52.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1985) ‘Functionalism and anomalous monism’, in LePore, E. & McLaughlin, B. P., edd., Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Oxford/New York) 387–98.Google Scholar
Méhat, A. (1966) Etudes sur les ‘Stromates’ de Clément d’Alexandrie, Patristica Sorbonensia 7 (Paris).Google Scholar
Meijering, R. (1987) ‘Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia’ (dissertation Groningen).Google Scholar
Mejer, J. (1978) Diogenes Laertius and his Hellenistic Background, Hermes Einzelschr. 40 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Mejer, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the transmission of Greek philosophy’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW 11 36.5 (Berlin/New York) 3556–602.Google Scholar
Merlan, Ph. (1960) Studies in Epicurus and Aristotle (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor und Arkesilaos’, Lustrum 26, 7–94.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1985) ‘Weitere Akademiker heute: von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27, 39–148.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1978) ‘Sur la logique modale des stoiciens’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 317–46.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1988) ‘The Stoic notion of relatives’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 129–221.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1993) ‘The Stoic themata’, in Döring, & Ebert, (1993) 217–38.Google Scholar
Mills Patrick, M. (1899) Sextus Empiricus and Greek Scepticism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mills Patrick, M. (1929) The Greek Sceptics (New York).Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988a) Epicurus’ Ethical Theory, Cornell studies in classical philology 48 (Ithaca/London).Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1988b) ‘Epicurus on death and the duration of life’, in Cleary, & Shartin, (1988) 303–22.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1995) ‘The Cynics and politics’, in Laks, & Schofield, (1995) 129–58.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) (rev. Farrington 1939) JRS 31, 149–57, repr. in id. (1960) Secondo contributo alla storia degli studi classici, Storia e letteratura 77 (Rome) 375–88.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1993) The Development of Greek Biography, expanded edn (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Mondolfo, R. (1934) L’infinito nel pensiero dei Greci (Florence).Google Scholar
Monet, A. (1996) ‘[Philodème, Sur les sensations] PHerc. 19/698’, CErc. 26, 27–127.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., ed. (1994) La philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine (Vandœuvres/Geneva).Google Scholar
Montoneri, L., ed. (1984) I Megarici: studio storico-critico e traduzione delle testimonianze antiche (Catania).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1973) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos von Rhodos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias Bd. 1, Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. v. Chr., Peripatoi 5 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1986) ‘Diogène Laërce et le Peripatos’, in Giannantoni, (1986a) 245–94.Google Scholar
Moretti, L. (1967) Iscrizioni storiche ellenistiche, 1: Attica, Peloponneso, Beozia (Florence).Google Scholar
Moretti, L. (1976) ‘Epigrafica. 16. Un successore di Posidonio d' Apamea’, RFIC 104, 191–4.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. (1987) ‘On Professor Vlastos' Xenophon’, AncPhil 7, 9–22.Google Scholar
Morrow, G., ed. (1970) Proclus: A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid's Elements (Princeton).Google Scholar
Most, G. W., ed. (1996) Collecting Fragments — Fragmente Sammeln (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Mudry, Ph. (1982) La préface du De Medicina de Celse, Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana 19 (Rome).Google Scholar
Mudry, Ph. (1990) ‘Le scepticisme des médecins empiriques dans le traité De la médecine de Celse: modèles et modalités’, in Le scepticisme antique: perspectives historiques et systématiques, Cahiers de la Revue de théologie et de philosophie 15, 85–96.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1974) ‘Greek mathematics and Greek logic’, in Corcoran, J., ed., Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation (Dordrecht/Boston) 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, I. (1979) ‘The completeness of Stoic propositional logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, I. (1981) Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements (Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Geometry and Scepticism’, in Barnes, et al. (1982a) 69–95.Google Scholar
Mühll, P. Von, ed. (1922) Epicuri epistulae tres et ratae sententiae a Laertio Diogene servatae (Leipzig, various repr.).Google Scholar
Müller, H.-E. (1943) Die Prinzipien der stoischen Grammatik, 2 vols. (Rostock).Google Scholar
Muller, R., ed. (1985) Les Mégariques: Fragments et témoignages (Paris).Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1994) ‘Bryson d'Héraclée’, in Goulet, (1989–94) 11, 142–3.
Müller, R. (1972) Die epikureische Gesellschaftstheorie (Berlin).Google Scholar
Müller, R. (1991) Die Epikureische Ethik, Schriften zur Geschichte und Kultur der Antike 32 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, JRS 55, 161–82.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1967) ‘Aristeas and Ptolemaic kingship’, JThS 18, 337–71.Google Scholar
Murray, O. (1970) ‘Hecataeus of Abdera and Pharaonic kingship’, JEA 56, 141–71.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1911a) ‘Inhaltsangabe und Kapitelüberschrift im antiken Buch’, Hermes 46, 93–107.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1911b) ‘Die Stufen der Wahrscheinlichkeit bei Karneades’, RhM 66, 190–8.Google Scholar
Nachmanson, E. (1941) Der griechische Buchtitel. Einige Beobachtungen, Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 47.19 (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Nassen Poulos, P. (1981) ‘Form and function of the pronouncement story in DiogenesLives', in Tannehill, R. C., ed., Pronouncement Studies (Missoula) 53–64.Google Scholar
Natali, C. (1991) Bios theoretikos. La vita di Aristotele e l'organizzazione della sua scuola (Bologna).Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (1884) Forschungen zur Geschichte des Erkenntnisproblems im Alterthum (Berlin; repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Nautin, P. (1976) ‘La fin des Stromates et les hypotyposes de Clément d’Alexandrie’, VChr 30, 268–302.Google Scholar
Nebel, G. (1935) ‘Der Begriff des Kathēkon in der alten Stoa’, Hermes 70, 439–60.Google Scholar
Nestle, W. (1932) ‘Metrodoros (14)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 15, cols. 1475–6.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. (1975) A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy, 3 vols. (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehues Pröbsting, H. (1979) Der Kynismus des Diogenes und der Begriff des Zynismus, Humanistische Bibliothek, Reihe 1 Bd. 40 (Munich).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1870) ‘Analecta Laertiana’, RhM 25, 217–31.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1973) Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity (Amsterdam/London).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) ‘Therapeutic arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a) 31–74.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1987) ‘The Stoics on the extirpation of the passions’, Apeiron 20, 129–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton).Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1984) ‘P.Oxy. 215 and Epicurean religious θ∊ωρια’, in Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia, vol. II (Naples) 607–19.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1988) ‘Hermarchus, Against Empedocles’, CQ 38, 428–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, GRBS 30, 187–223.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1992) ‘Epicurus 11 (?): Sulla religiosità e il culto popolare’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini I, 1 (Florence) 167–91.Google Scholar
Obbink, D., ed. (1995) Philodemus and Poetry. Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus and Horace (Oxford).Google Scholar
Obbink, D., ed. (1996) Philodemus On Piety, Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. (1981) Theories of Weight in the Ancient World, vol. I: Democritus, Weight and Size, PhA 37 (Leiden/Paris).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1978) The Library of Lactantius (Oxford).Google Scholar
O'Meara, D. J., ed. (1981) Studies in Aristotle, Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 9 (Washington).Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1962) ‘Epitome’, in RAC Bd. 5 (Stuttgart) 944–73.Google Scholar
Ophuijsen, J. M. (1994) ‘Where have the topics gone?’, in Fortenbaugh & Mirhady (1994) 131–73.Google Scholar
Ophuijsen, J. & Raalte, M., edd. (1998) Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources, RUSCH 8 (New Brunswick).Google Scholar
Pachet, P. (1978) ‘L'imperatif stoïcien’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 361–74.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1910) ‘Doxographica aus Basiliusscholien’, NAWG, Philol.-hist. Klasse 194–228.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. repr. in LaPenna, A. et al., edd., G. Pasquali: Scritti filologici, vol. I (Florence 1986) 539–74.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G., (1952) Storia della tradizione e critica del testo (Florence, 2nd edn 1971).Google Scholar
Pearson, A. C., ed. (1891) The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. (1971) ‘Oikeiōsis’, in Long, (1971a) 114–49.Google Scholar
Pépin, J. (1976) Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar
Pesce, D. (1980) Introduzione a Epicuro (Rome/Bari).Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford).Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1910) ‘Die Rechtsphilosophie der Epikureer’, AGPh 23, 289–337, 433–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippson, R. (1911) ‘Zu Ciceros erstem Buch De finibus’, RhM 66, 231–6.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1932) ‘Das “erste Naturgemäβe”’, Philologus 87, 445–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippson, R. (1935) ‘Neokles (4)’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 16.2, cols. 2414–16.Google Scholar
Piantelli, M. (1978) ‘Possibili elementi indiani nella formazione del pensiero di Pirrone d'Elide’, Filosofia 29, 135–64.Google Scholar
Pinborg, J. (1961) ‘Interjektionen und Naturlaute. Petrus Heliae und ein Problem der antiken und mittelalterlichen Sprachphilosophie’, C&M 22, 117–38.Google Scholar
Pinborg, J. (1975) ‘Classical Antiquity: Greece’, in Sebeok, T. A., ed., Current Trends in Linguistics 13.1: Historiography of Linguistics (Den Haag/Paris) 69–126.Google Scholar
Places, E. des, ed. (1987) Eusèbe de Césarée: La préparation évangélique, Livres XIV–XV, SC 338 (Paris).Google Scholar
Plasberg, O. (1922) M. Tulli Ciceronis Academicorum Reliquiae cum Lucullo, BibliothecaTeubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1934) ‘Cicero de officiis III’, NGG, Philos.-hist.Kl. 1, 1–40; repr. in Pohlenz, (1965) I, 243–91.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1939) ‘Die Begründung der abendländischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa’, NGG, Phil.-hist. Kl. III, 6, 151–98; repr. in Pohlenz, (1965) I, 39–86.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1940) Grundfragen der stoischen Philosophie, Abh. der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl. 3e Folge, 26.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. repr. in Tarán, L., ed. (1987) Greek & Roman Philosophy (New York/London) 1–122.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1959) Die Stoa, 2nd edn (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1965) Kleine Schriften, 2 vols. (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1967) La Stoa [trad. it.] (Florence).Google Scholar
Pope, M. (1986) ‘Epicureanism and the atomic swerve’, SO 61, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1992) ‘Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer’, in Lamberton & Keaney (1992) 67–114.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1994) ‘Stoic morals and poetics in Philodemus’, CErc 24, 63–88.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1995) ‘Oι κριτικoι: a reassessment’, in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. & Sluiter, I., edd. (1995) Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: a Collections of Papers in Honour of Schenkeveld, D. M. (Amsterdam) 83–109.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F., ed. (1995a) Cicero the Philosopher, Twelve Papers (Oxford).Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1995b) ‘Introduction: Cicero's philosophical works and their background’, in Powell, (1995a) 1–35.Google Scholar
Pra, M. dal (1950) Lo Scetticismo Greco (Milano; repr. in 2 vols. Rome/Bari 1975–2).Google Scholar
Prantl, C. von (1855) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, Bd. 1 (Leipzig; repr. Graz 1955).Google Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1955) ‘Diodoran modalities’, PhilosQ 5, 205–13.Google Scholar
Puglia, E. (1980) ‘Nuove letture nei PHerc. 1012 e 1786 (Demetrii Laconis opera incerta)’, CErc 10, 25–53.Google Scholar
Puglia, E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).Google Scholar
Puliga, D. (1983) ‘XPONOΣ e ΘANATOΣ in Epicuro’, Elenchos 4, 235–60.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1993) ‘Epicurus on the telos’, Phronesis 38, 281–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1994) ‘Magnifying Epicurean minima’, AncPhil 14, 115–46.Google Scholar
Raalte, M. (1988) ‘The idea of the cosmos as an organic whole in TheophrastusMetaphysics', in Fortenbaugh & Sharples (1988) 189–215.Google Scholar
Rabbow, P. (1954) Seelenführung, Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike (Munich).Google Scholar
Rabe, H. (1931) Prolegomenon Sylloge, Bibliotheca Teubneriana, Rhetores graeci, vol. XIV (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Raphael, M. (1931) ‘Die pyrrhoneische Skepsis’, Philosophische Hefte 3, 47–70.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A. E. (1991 (1949)) ‘Phaidros and his Roman pupils’, in Obbink, D. & Vander Waerdt, P. A., edd. (1991) Raubitschek, A. E.: The School of Hellas: Essays on Greek History, Archaeology and Literature (New York/Oxford) 337–44, orig. ed. Hesperia, 18 (1949) 96–103.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1969) The Spartan Tradition in European Thought (Oxford; repr. 1991).Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1975) Cicero: A Portrait (London).Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (London).Google Scholar
Reale, G. (1981) ‘Ipotesi per una rilettura della filosofia di Pirrone di Elide’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) I, 243–336.
Reesor, M. E. (1989) The Nature of Man in Early Stoic Philosophy (London).Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. (1940) ‘Theophrastos’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie Suppl. 7, cols. 1354–562.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (1885) Ciceronis, M. TulliAcademica (London; repr. Hildesheim 1966).Google Scholar
Repici, L. (1977) La Logica di Teofrasto: studio critico e raccolta dei frammenti e delle testimonianze (Bologna).Google Scholar
Repici, L. (1990) ‘L' epiglottide nell’ antichità tra medicina e filosofia’, HPLS 12, 67–104.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. & Wilson, N. G. (1978) Scribes & Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek & Latin Literature, 2nd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar
Richard, M. (1964) ‘Florilèges grecs’, in Dictionnaire de spiritualité ascétique et mystique, doctrine et histoire 5, 475–512 (Paris).Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1994) ‘Aristotle and Hellenistic scholarship’, in Montanari, (1994) 7–28.Google Scholar
Ridings, D. (1995) The Attic Moses: The Dependency Theme in Some Early Christian Writers (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
Rieth, O. (1933) Grundbegriffe der stoischen Ethik: Eine traditionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung, Problemata 9 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Rieth, O. (1934) ‘Über das Telos der Stoiker’, Hermes 69, 13–45.Google Scholar
Rijk, L. M. (1966) ‘Some notes on the Medieval tract De insolubilibus, with the edition of a tract dating from the end of the twelfth century’, Vivarium 4, 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1969a) Stoic Philosophy (Cambridge; later repr.).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1969b) ‘Categories and their uses’, in Rist, (1969a) 152–72; repr. in Long, (1971a) 38–57.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An introduction (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1974) ‘Pleasure: 360–300 bc’, Phoenix 28, 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1977) ‘Zeno and Stoic consistency’, Phronesis 22, 161–74; repr. in Anton & Preuss (1983) 465–77.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1978a) ‘Zeno and the origins of Stoic logic’, in Brunschwig, (1978a) 387–400.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M., ed. (1978b) The Stoics (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1978c) ‘The Stoic concept of detachment’ in Rist, (1978b) 259–73.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1980) ‘Epicurus on friendship’, CPh 75, 121–9.Google Scholar
Riverso, E. (1960) ‘Il paradosso del mentitore’, RScF 12, 296–325.Google Scholar
Robin, L. (1944) Pyrrhon et le Scepticisme Grec (Paris).Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1979) A Short History of Linguistics, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1969) Essays in Greek Philosophy (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rohde, E. (1881) ‘Ueber Leukipp und Demokrit’, Verhandlungen der 34. Philologenvers. zu Trier 1880 (Leipzig) 64–90.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. repr. in Kleine Schriften (Tübingen/Leipzig 1901) vol. I, 205–45.Google Scholar
Romano, F., ed. (1980) Democrito e l'atomismo antico (Catania).Google Scholar
Romeo, C. (1979) ‘Demetrio Lacone sulla grandezza del sole (PHerc. 1013)’, CErc 9, 11–35.Google Scholar
Romeo, C., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: La poesia (PHerc. 188 e 1014), La scuola di Epicuro 9 (Naples).Google Scholar
Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. & Skinner, Q., edd. (1984) Philosophy in History, Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roselli, A. (1990) ‘Appunti per una storia dell'uso apologetico della filologia: la nuova edizione di Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012)’, SCO 40, 117–38.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. E. (1986) ‘How to be dead and not care: a defense of Epicurus’, APhQ 23, 217–25.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. E. (1990) ‘Epicurus on pleasure and the complete life’, in Cooper, J., ed. The Monist 73, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin Pinault, J. (1992) Hippocratic Lives and Legends, Studies in Ancient Medicine 4 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Ruland, H.-J. (1976) Die arabische Fassung zweier Schriften des Alexander von Aphrodisias: Über die Vorsehung und Über das liberum arbitrium (Saarbrücken).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1981) ‘Philo's De aeternitate mundi: the problem of its interpretation’, VChr 35, 105–51.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1989) ‘Xenophanes on the moon: a doxographicum in Aëtius’, Phronesis 34, 245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1990) Exegesis and Philosophy: Studies in Philo of Alexandria, Variorum CSS 332 (Aldershot).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1992) ‘The language of excellence in Plato's Timaeus and later Platonism’, in Gersh, S. & Kannengiesser, C., eds., Platonism in Late Antiquity (Notre Dame) 11–37.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1993) Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey, Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum III.3 (Assen/Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996a) ‘Additional fragments of Arius Didymus on physics’, in Algra, et al. (1996) 363–81.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996b) ‘Atheists in Aëtius. Text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10’, Mnemosyne IV.59, 542–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, A. (1978) Scettici antichi, Classici della filosofia 22 (Turin).Google Scholar
Rüstow, A. (1910) Der Lügner: Theorie/Geschichte und Auflösung (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Ryffel, H. (1949) Der Wandel der Staatsverfassungen (Bern).Google Scholar
Saffrey, H. D. & Westerink, L. G., eds. (1968) Proclus: Théologie Platonicienne, t. I, Coll. Budé (Paris).Google Scholar
Salvadori Baldascino, L. (1990) ‘Masilaos oppure Mnasilas?’, CErc 20, 65–6.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1959) Physics of the Stoics (London).Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and prolepsis’, CQ 24, 45–51.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H., ed. (1969) Plutarch'sMoralia, vol. 15: Fragments, LCL (Cambridge, Mass./London).Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1971) ‘Phantasia kataleptike’, in Long (1971a) 9–21.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1989 (1975)) The Stoics, 2nd edn (Bristol (London)).Google Scholar
Saunders, T. J. (1984) ‘Free will and atomic swerve in Lucretius’, SO 59, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbordone, F. (1968) ‘Primi lineamenti d'un ritratto di Fedro epicureo’, P & I 10, 21–30.Google Scholar
Scarborough, J. (1985) ‘Erasistratus, student of Theophrastus?’, BHM 59, 515–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Schäfer, K. Th. (1959) ‘Eisagoge’, RAC Bd. 4 (Stuttgart) 862–904.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1977) ‘Homerum ex Homero’, MH 34, 221–7.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1990) ‘Philosophie und Rhetorik in der Auseinandersetzung um die Religion. Zu Cicero, De natura deorum I’, MH 47, 87–101.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1993) ‘Kritisches und Exegetisches zu Ciceros “Lucullus” II’, MH 50, 158–69.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1964) ‘Studies in Demetrius “On Style”’ (dissertation Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1968) ‘Oι κριτικoι in Philodemus’, Mnemosyne 21, 176–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1970) ‘Aristarchus and OMHPOΣ ΦIΛOTEXNOΣ. Some fundamental ideas of Aristarchus on Homer as a poet’, Mnemosyne 23, 162–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1983) ‘Linguistic theories in the rhetorical works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, Glotta 61, 67–94.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1984) ‘Studies in the history of ancient linguistics II: Stoic and Peripatetic kinds of speech act and the distinction of grammatical moods’, Mnemosyne 37, 291–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1990a) ‘Studies in the history of ancient linguistics III: The Stoic TEXNH ΠEPI ΦωNHΣ’, Mnemosyne 43, 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1990b) ‘Studies in the history of ancient linguistics IV: Developments in the study of ancient linguistics’, Mnemosyne 43, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1991) ‘Figures and tropes. A border-case between grammar and rhetoric’, in Ueding (1991) 149–60.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1993) ‘Pap. Hamb. 128. A Hellenistic ars poetica’, ZPE 97, 67–80.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1994) ‘Scholarship and grammar’, in Montanari (1994) 263–301.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1995) ‘The linguistic contents of Dionysius’ Παραγγέλματα’, in Law, V. & Sluiter, I., edd., Dionysius Thrax and the Technē Grammatikē (Müster) 41–52.Google Scholar
Schian, R. (1973) Untersuchungen über das ‘argumentum e consensu omnium’, Spudasmata 28 (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1990) Simulacrum et Imago: gli argomenti analogici nel De rerum natura (Pisa).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1936) Epikurs Kritik der platonischen Elementenlehre, Klassisch-philologische Studien 9 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1939) Ethica Epicurea, Pap. Herc. 1251, Studia Herculanensia 1 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1951) ‘Götter und Menschen in der Theologie Epikurs’, RhM 94, 97–156.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1957) ‘Contritio und ultima linea rerum in neuen epikureischen Texten’, RhM 100, 301–27.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1962) ‘Epikur’, in RAC Bd. 5 (Stuttgart) 681–819.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. repr. in Erbse, H. & Küppers, J., edd. (1984) W. Schmid: Ausgewählte philologische Schriften (Berlin/New York) 151–266.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1978) ‘Lucretius ethicus’, in Gigon, O., ed. Lucrèce, Fondation Hardt 24 (Vandœuvres/Geneva) 123–57.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1975) ‘Lukrez und die Stoiker, Quellenuntersuchungen zu De rerum natura’ (dissertation Marburg).Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1990) Lukrez, der Kepos und die Stoiker, Untersuchungen zur Schule Epikurs und zu den Quellen von De rerum natura (Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. L. (1978) ‘Cicero's place in Roman philosophy: a study of his prefaces’, CJ 74, 115–27.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. T. (1967 (1839)) Stoicorum Grammatica (Halle, repr. Amsterdam 1967).Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. T. transl. by Hülser, K. (1979) ‘Die Grammatik der Stoiker’, with an introduction by Egli, U., Schriften zur Linguistik 12 (Braunschweig/Wiesbaden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P., ed. (1991) Sprachtheorien der Abendländischen Antike, Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2 (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Schober, A., ed. (1988) ‘Philodemi De pietate pars prior’, CErc 18, 67–125.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1980b) ‘Preconception, argument and god’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 283–308.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1984) ‘Ariston of Chios and the unity of virtue’, AncPhil 4, 83–96.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1986b) ‘Cicero for and against divination’, JRS 76, 47–65.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1988) ‘The retrenchable present’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 329–74.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991) The Stoic Idea of the City (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) ‘Two Stoic approaches to justice’, in Laks, & Schofield, (1995) 191–212.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. F. & Barnes, J., edd. (1980a) Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology (Oxford).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. & Nussbaum, M. C., edd. (1982) Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to Owen, G. E. L. (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. & Striker, G., edd. (1986a) The Norms of Nature, Studies in Hellenistic Ethics (Cambridge/Paris).Google Scholar
Schubert, A. (1994) Untersuchungen zur stoischen Bedeutungslehre (Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, E. (1905) ‘Diogenes (40) Laertios’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie 5, cols. 738–63.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind (Boston).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1973) ‘Epicurus, On Nature book XXVIII’, CErc 3, 5–83.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1974) ‘The structure of Epicurus' On Nature’, CErc 4, 89–92.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1976a) ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack, & Laks, (1976) 119–59.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1976b) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, CErc 6, 23–54.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy’, PCPhS 23, 74–120.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1981) ‘The end of the Academy’, Phronesis 26, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1982a) ‘Two conceptions of vacuum’, Phronesis 27, 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1982b) ‘The Stoic criterion of identity’, Phronesis 27, 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1982c) ‘On Signs’, in Barnes, et al. (1982a) 239–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1983a) ‘The motivation of Greek skepticism’, in Burnyeat, (1983) 9–29.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1983b) ‘Epicurus’ refutation of determinism’, in AA. VV. (1983) 11–51.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1984) ‘The negated conjunction in Stoicism’, Elenchos 5, 311–16.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1985) ‘The Stoic theory of universals’, in Epp (1985) 87–92.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1988) ‘Epicurean anti-reductionism’, in Barnes, & Mignucci, (1988a) 295–327.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989) 97–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989b) ‘Epicurus on the common sensibles’, in Huby, & Neal, (1989) 123–36.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1992a) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’, Elenchos 13, 19–56.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1992b) ‘Commentary on Mansfeld’, in Cleary, & Wians, (1992) 146–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Giannantoni, & Gigante, (1996) 313–39.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1997) ‘Theophrastus and Epicurean physics’, in Ophuijsen, & Raalte, (1998) 331–54.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transmission of Greek Wisdom (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seel, G. (1993) ‘Zur Geschichte und Logik des θ∊ριζων λoγo’, in Döring & Ebert (1993) 291–318.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Fate, Text, Translation, Commentary (London; repr. 1987).Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1984) ‘On fire in Heraclitus and in Zeno of Citium’, CQ 34, 231–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: scholasticism and innovation’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.2 (Berlin/New York) 1176–243.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W., ed. (1993) Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers (London).Google Scholar
Shields, C. J. (1994) ‘Socrates among the Skeptics’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A., ed., The Socratic Movement (Ithaca, NY) 341–66.Google Scholar
Siebenborn, E. (1976) Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien: Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik, Studien zur antiken Philosophie 5 (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. A. (1951) A History of Greek Political Thought, 2nd edn 1968 (London).Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (1988) ‘On ἤη διασαφητικU+1F40ς and propositions containing μαλλoν/ἧηττoν’, Mnemosyne 41, 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluiter, I. (1990) Ancient Grammar in Context: contributions to the study of ancient linguistic thought (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Smend, R. (1984) Die Entstehung des Alten Testaments 3rd edn (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Smith, M. F., ed. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La scuola di Epicuro, suppl. 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
Smith, W. D. (1979) The Hippocratic Tradition, Cornell Publications in the History of Science (Ithaca, N.Y./London).Google Scholar
Smith, W. D. (1989) ‘Notes on ancient medical historiography’, BHM 63, 73–109.Google ScholarPubMed
Sollenberger, M. G. (1992) ‘The lives of the Peripatetics: an analysis of the contents and structure of Diogenes Laertius' “Vitae philosophorum” book 5’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.6 (Berlin/New York) 3793–879.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1929) ‘Ancora il frammento logico fiorentino’, RFIC 7, 507–10; repr. in Solmsen, (1968–82) II, 44–7.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941) ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, AJPh 62, 35–50, 169–90.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1942) ‘Eratosthenes as Platonist and poet’, TAPhA 73, 192–213.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1951) ‘Epicurus and cosmological heresies’, AJPh 72, 1–23; repr. in Solmsen, (1968–82) 1, 461–83.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1953) ‘Epicurus on the growth and decline of the cosmos’, AJPh 74, 34–51; repr. in Solmsen, (1968–82) 1, 484–501.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1961) ‘Greek philosophy and the discovery of the nerves’, MH 18, 150–97; repr. in Solmsen, (1968–82) 1, 536–82.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1968–82) Kleine Schriften, 3 vols. (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1977) ‘Epicurus on void, matter and genesis’, Phronesis 22, 263–81; repr. in Solmsen, (1968–82) III, 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980a) Necessity, Cause, and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory (Ithaca, N.Y. and London).Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980b) ‘Causation, laws, and necessity’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 250–82.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1983) Time, Creation and the Continuum (London).Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel (London).Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., ed. (1990) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (London).Google Scholar
Soreth, M. (1968) ‘Die zweite Telosformel des Antipater von Tarsos’, AGPh 50, 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E., ed. (1975) Causation and Conditionals (Oxford).Google Scholar
Spanneut, M. (1957) Le Stoïcisme des Pères de l'Eglise de Clément de Rome à Clément d'Alexandrie (Paris).Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (1986) ‘Metrodoro contro i dialettici?’, CErc 16, 29–43.Google Scholar
Squilloni, A. (1991) Il concetto di ‘regno’ nel pensiero dello ps.Ecfanto: le fonti e i trattati ΠΠ∊ριβασιλ∊ιας (Florence).Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1975) ‘Experiment and experience in Hellenistic medicine’, BICS 22, 178–99.Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1978) ‘The Stoic theory of perception and its “Platonic” critics’, in Machamer, P. K. & Turnbull, R. G., edd., Studies in Perception (Columbus) 96–136.Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1982) ‘Hairesis and heresy: the case of the haireseis iatrikai’, in Meyer, B. F. & Sanders, E. P., edd., Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, 3: Self-Definition in the Graeco-Roman World (London) 76–100, 199–206.Google Scholar
Staden, H. von, ed. (1989) Herophilus, The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1991) ‘Galen as historian: his use of sources on the Herophileans’, in López Férez, J. A., ed., Galeno: Obra, pensamiento e influencia (Madrid) 205–22.Google Scholar
Staden, H. von (1997) ‘Teleology and mechanism: Aristotelian biology and early hellenistic medicine’, in Kullman, W., & Föllinger, S., edd., Aristotelische Biologie (Stuttgart) 183–208.Google Scholar
Steckel, H. (1960) ‘Epikurs Prinzip der Einheit von Schmerzlosigkeit und Lust’ (dissertation Göttingen).Google Scholar
Steckel, H. (1968) ‘Epikuros’, in Pauly Wissowa, Realencyclopädie Suppl. 11, cols. 579–652.Google Scholar
Steckerl, F. (1958) The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and His School, PhA 8 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1964) Die Physik des Theophrastos von Eresos, Palingenesia 1 (Bad Homburg).Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1990) ‘Planung und Planänderung der philosophischen Schriften Ciceros’, in Steinmetz, P., ed., Beiträge zur hellenistischen Literatur und ihrer Rezeption in Rom (Stuttgart) 141–53.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1994) ‘Die Stoa’, in Flashar, (1994) 491–716.Google Scholar
Steinthal, H. (1890–91) Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht der Logik, 2nd edn, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar
Sternbach, L., ed. (1963) Gnomologium Vaticanum e codice vaticano graeco 743; repr. from WS9–11 (1887–9) (Berlin).Google Scholar
Stopper, M. R. (1983) ‘Schizzi Pirroniani’, Phronesis 28, 265–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stough, Ch.L. (1969) Greek Scepticism (Berkeley/Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1965) ‘Posidonius on problems of the Roman empire’, JRS 55, 40–53.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1966) ‘Der “Scipionenkreis”’, Hermes 94, 60–72.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1974) Kριτ̮ριoν τἀς ἀαληθ∊ια, NGG, Philol.-hist. Klasse, 2, 47–110; repr. in Striker, (1996) 22–77.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1977) ‘Epicurus on the truth of sense impressions’, AGPh 59, 125–42; repr. in Striker, (1996) 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical strategies’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 54–83; repr. in Striker, (1996) 92–116.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1981) ‘Über den Unterschied zwischen den Pyrrhoneern und den Akademikern’, Phronesis 26, 153–71; English version in Striker, (1996) 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. (1983) ‘The role of oikeiōsis in Stoic ethics’, OSAP 1, 145–67; repr. in Striker, (1996) 281–98.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1986) ‘Antipater, or the art of living’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a) 185–204; repr. in Striker, (1996) 298–316.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1987) ‘Origins of the concept of natural law’, in Cleary, J. J., ed., Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2 (Lanham, MD) 79–101; repr. in Striker, (1996) 209–21.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1988) ‘Commentary on Mitsis (1988b)’, in Cleary, & Shartin, (1988) 323–8.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1990) ‘The problem of the criterion’, in Everson, (1990a) 143–60; repr. in Striker, (1996) 150–69.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1991) ‘Following nature. A study in Stoic ethics’, OSAP 10, 1–73; repr. in Striker, (1996) 221–81.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1993) ‘Epicurean hedonism’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) 3–17; repr. in Striker, (1996) 196–209.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996) Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroux, J. (1912) De Theophrasti Virtutibus Dicendi (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Sudhaus, E. S. (1911) ‘Epikur als Beichtvater’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 14, 647–8.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. W. (1967) Apuleian logic: The Nature, Sources, and Influence of Apuleius's Peri Hermeneias (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Szabó, A. (1960) ‘Anfänge des euklidischen Axiomensystems’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1, 38–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, A. (1969) Anfänge der griechischen Mathematik (Munich).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardieu, M., ed. (1987) Les Règles de l'Interprétation (Paris).Google Scholar
Tarn, W. W. (1933) ‘Alexander and the unity of mankind’, PBA 19, 123–66.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1984) ‘Zeno on knowledge or on geometry? The evidence of Anon. In Theaetetum’, Phronesis 29, 96–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (1980) ‘All perceptions are true’, in Schofield, et al. (1980a) 105–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (1990) ‘Aristotle's epistemology’, in Everson, (1990a) 116–42.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. J., ed. (1987a) The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period (Amsterdam).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. J. (1987b) ‘Rethinking the history of language science in classical antiquity’, in Taylor, (1987a) 1–16.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1975) ‘The metaphysics of causation’, in Sosa, (1975) 39–43.Google Scholar
Temkin, O. & Temkin, C. L., edd. (1967) Ancient Medicine, Selected Papers of Edelstein, L. (Baltimore; repr. Baltimore/London 1987).Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1978) ‘Il primo libro “Sulla ricchezza” di Filodemo’, CErc 8, 52–95.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1987) ‘Una testimonianza del libro “Sul fine” di Epicuro?’, CErc 17, 85–8.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1990) ‘Il contributo di Metrodoro di Lampsaco alla formazione della teoria Epicurea del linguaggio’, CErc 20, 17–25.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A., ed. (1991) Polieno: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 11 (Naples).Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1992) ‘Metrodoro “Contro i dialettici”?’, CErc 22, 119–22.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1994) ‘L'opera filodemea Su Epicuro (PHerc. 1232, 1289b)’, CErc 24, 5–53.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1961) An Introduction to the Pythagorean Writings of the Hellenistic Period (Åbo).Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1965) The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period (Åbo).Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1972) ‘The problem of the Doric pseudo-Pythagorica’, in Pseudepigrapha I, Fondation Hardt 18 (Vandœuvres/Geneva) 59–87.Google Scholar
Throm, H. (1932) Die Thesis (Paderborn).Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1991) ‘Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic embryology. Ps.Plutarch, Plac. V 15.4 reconsidered’, Mnemosyne 44, 106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1996) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul, Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III, PhA 68 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1974) The Legend of Sparta in Classical Antiquity, vol. II (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1972) ‘Friedrich Schlegel e gli inizi della linguistica indoeuropea in Germania’, Critica Storica N.S. 10, 72–105, rev. transl. in Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Ser. 1, Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, vol. I (Amsterdam) xi–lvii.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1981 (1963)) La genesi del metodo del Lachmann, Saggi 5 (Padua (Florence 1963)).Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1973) ‘The Stoic common notions’, SO 48, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation and Commentary (Leiden).Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1978) ‘Monism and immanence: foundations of Stoic physics’, in Rist, (1978b) 137–60.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1985) ‘The title of Cleomedes' treatise’, Philologus 129, 250–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1989) ‘The Stoics and their cosmology in the first and second centuries AD’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.3 (Berlin/New York) 1365–78.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B., ed. (1990) Cleomedis Caelestia (METEΩPA) (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Tracy, S. (1994) Boeotia Antiqua (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Trillitzsch, W. (1971) Seneca im literarischen Urteil der Antike. Darstellung und Sammlung der Zeugnisse, 2 vols. (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Trompf, G. W. (1979) The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought: From Antiquity to the Reformation (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Tsekourakis, D. (1974) Studies in the Terminology of Early Stoic Ethics, Hermes Einzelschr. 32 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Tsouna McKirahan, V. (1992) ‘The Cyrenaic theory of knowledge’, OSAP 10, 161–92.Google Scholar
TsounaMcKirahan, V. McKirahan, V. (1998) The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueding, G., ed. (1991) Rhetorik zwischen den Wissenschaften: Geschichte, System, Praxis als Probleme des ‘Historischen Wörterbuchs der Rhetorik’ (Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usener, H., ed. (1887) Epicurea (Leipzig; repr. Stuttgart 1966).Google Scholar
Vallance, J. T. (1990) The Lost Theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1987) ‘The justice of the Epicurean wise man’, CQ 37, 402–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1988) ‘Hermarchus and the Epicurean genealogy of morals’, TAPA 118, 87–106.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1989) ‘Colotes and the Epicurean refutation of Skepticism’, GRBS 30, 225–67.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1986) ‘Tradizione e verità. Forme della storiografia filosofico-scientifica nel De placitis di Galeno’, in Cambiano, G., ed., Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica (Turin) 227–44.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1989) L'etica degli antichi, Manuali Laterza 4 (Rome/Bari).Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1993) ‘I nervi dell' anima’, in ,Kollesch & Nickel (1993) 63–77.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1945) L'évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du Stoicisme à S. Augustin (Paris/Louvain).Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1949) Kleanthes van Assos (Brussels).Google Scholar
Versteegh, C. H. M. (1980) ‘The Stoic verbal system’, Hermes 108, 338–57.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1976) Le pain et le cirque: sociologie historique d'un pluralisme politique (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viano, C. A. (1981) ‘Lo scetticismo antico e la medicina’, in Giannantoni, (1981a) II, 563–656.
Vitelli, G. (1902) ‘Due frammenti di Alessandro di Afrodisia’, in Festschrift Theodor Gomperz (Wien) 90–3.Google Scholar
Vitelli, G. Engl. transl. in Sharples, R. W., ed. (1994) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16–3.15 (London) 90–4.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1965) ‘Minimal parts in Epicurean atomism’, Isis 56, 121–47; repr. in Graham, (1995) 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1966) ‘Zeno of Sidon as a critic of Euclid’, in Wallach, L., ed., The Classical Tradition, Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan (Ithaca) 148–59; repr. in Graham, (1995) 315–24.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelke, A.-J. (1973) L'idée de volonté dans le Stoïcisme (Paris).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., ed. (1885) Corpusculum poesis epicae ludibundae, vol. II: De Timone Phliasio ceterisque sillographis commentatio (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1957) A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. I (Oxford).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1972) Polybius (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1984) ‘Monarchies and monarchical ideas’, in The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd edn, vol. VII.1 (Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, R. & Frede, M., edd. (1985) Galen. Three Treatises On the Nature of Science, 3 vols. (Indianapolis).Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1988) ‘Lucretius on what atoms are not’, CPh 83, 112–28.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, A. (1978) ‘Epicurean science’, Hermes, 106, 484–94.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1966) The Stoic Theory of Knowledge (Belfast).Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1971) ‘The natural law and Stoicism’, in Long, (1971a) 216–38.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F., ed. (1969a) Straton von Lampsakos, Die Schule des Aristoteles: H. 5, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F., ed. (1969b) Eudemos von Rhodos, Die Schule des Aristoteles, H. 8, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F., ed. (1969c) Phainias von Eresos, Chamaileon, Praxiphanes, Die Schule des Aristoteles, H. 9, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F., ed. (1969d) Hieronymos von Rhodos, Kritolaos und seine Schüler, Die Schule des Aristoteles, H. 10, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1976) (rev. Lynch 1972) Gnomon 48, 128–34.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F., ed. (1978) Sotion, Die Schule des Aristoteles, Suppl. Bd. 2 (Basle/Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1983) ‘Der Peripatos bis zum Beginn der römischen Kaiserzeit’, in Flashar, (1983) 459–599.Google Scholar
Weische, A. (1961) Cicero und die Neue Akademie: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Geschichte der antiken Skeptizismus, Orbis antiquus 18 (Münster i. Westf., 2nd edn 1975).Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. (1895) ‘Die pneumatische Schule bis auf Archigenes in ihrer Entwicklung dargestellt’, Philosophische Untersuchungen 14 (1895).Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. (1901) Fragmentensammlung der griechischen Ärzte, vol. I: Die Fragmente der sikelischen Ärzte Akron, Philistion und des Diokles von Karystos (Berlin).Google Scholar
Wendland, P. (1897) ‘Eine doxographische Quelle Philos’, Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1074–9.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G., ed. (1990) Prolégomènes à la philosophie de Platon, Coll. Budé (Paris).Google Scholar
White, M. J. (1992) The Continuous and the Discrete, Ancient Physical Theories from a Contemporary Perspective (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, N. P. (1978) ‘Two notes on Stoic terminology’, AJPh 99, 111–19.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1979) ‘The basis of Stoic ethics’, HSPh 83, 143–78.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1985) ‘The role of physics in Stoic ethics’, in Epp, (1985) 57–74.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1990) ‘Stoic values’, The Monist 73, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (1991) (rev. Englert 1987) AncPhil 11, 455–9.Google Scholar
Wiesner, J., ed. (1985–87) Aristoteles, Werk und Wirkung, Paul Moraux gewidmet, 2 vols. (Berlin).Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-MoellendorffU., von U., von (1881) Antigonos von Karystos (Berlin; repr. 1965).Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994) Vagueness (London).Google Scholar
Wilson, N. G. (1983) Scholars of Byzantium (London).Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M., ed. (1981) Diagorae Melii et Theodori Cyrenaei reliquiae, Bibl. Teubneriana (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1984) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist?’, Philologus 128, 157–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1989) ‘Bibliographie zum antiken Atheismus’, Elenchos 10, 103–92.Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1990) ‘Methodisches zum antiken Atheismus’, RhM 133, 1–15.Google Scholar
Winiarczyk, M. (1992) ‘Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist? 2. Teil’, Philologus 136, 306–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, M. (1988) ‘Hipparchus and the Stoic theory of motion’, in Barnes & Mignucci (1988a) 471–545.Google Scholar
Woltjer, J. (1877) ‘Lucretii philosophia cum fontibus comparata’ (dissertation Groningen; repr. in Greek and Roman Philosophy 45, New York/London 1987).Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1986) ‘The skeptical side of Plato's method’, RIPh 90, 22–37.Google Scholar
Woodward, P. G. (1989) ‘Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157’, CErc 19, 29–47.Google Scholar
Wotke, K., ed. (1888) ‘Epikurische Spruchsammlung’, WS 10 (1888) 175–201.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. (1991) Cicero: On Stoic Good and Evil. De Finibus bonorum et malorum 3 and Paradoxa Stoicorum (Warminster).Google Scholar
Zacher, K. D. (1982) Plutarchs Kritik an der Lustlehre Epikurs. Ein Kommentar zu ‘Non posse suaviter vivi secund um Epicurum, Kap. 1–8’, Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 124 (Königstein).Google Scholar
Zacher, K. D. (1985) ‘Zur Lustlehre Epikurs’, WJA N.F. 11, 63–72.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1981) ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, RhM 124, 297–311.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) Die Maske des Sokrates. Das Bild des Intellektuellen in der antiken Kunst (Munich).Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (& Wellmann, E., ed.) (1909) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, III.1: Die nacharistotelische Philosophie, erste Hälfte (Leipzig; 5 1923 = Darmstadt 6 1963).Google Scholar
Zeller, E. & Mondolfo, R. (1969) La Filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, parte I: I Presocratici, vol. v: Empedocle, Atomisti, Anassagora, a cura di Capizzi, A. (Florence).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Jonathan Barnes, Université de Genève, Jaap Mansfeld, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Jonathan Barnes, Université de Genève, Jaap Mansfeld, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Jonathan Barnes, Université de Genève, Jaap Mansfeld, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Malcolm Schofield, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.028
Available formats
×