Association for Talent Development. 2014 state of the industry report. https://www.td.org/Professional-Resources/State-Of-The-Industry-Report (accessed March 1, 2015).Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. T., and Magjuka, R. J. 1991. Organizational training and signals of importance: Linking pretraining perceptions to intentions to transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2: 25–36.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bates, R. A. 2003. Managers as Transfer Agents: Improving Learning Transfer in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., and Huang, J. L. 2010. Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management 39: 1065–1105.Google Scholar

Brinkerhoff, R. O., and Montesino, M. U. 1995. Partnerships for training transfer: Lessons from a corporate study. Human Resource Development Quarterly 6: 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, M. L. 2005. Beyond Transfer of Training: Engaging Systems to Improve Performance. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Broad, M. L., and Newstrom, J. W. 1992. Transfer of Training: Action-Packed Strategies to Ensure High Payoff from Training Investments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Brown, T. C. 2005. Effectiveness of distal and proximal goals as a transfer-of-training intervention: A field experiment. Human Resource Development 16: 369–387.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A. 1997. Improving positive transfer: A test of relapse prevention training on transfer outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly 8: 115–128.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A. 2001. High-Impact Training Solutions: Top Issues Troubling Trainers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A., and Baldwin, T. 1999. Workforce training transfer: A study of the effect of relapse prevention training and transfer climate. Human Resource Management 38: 227–242.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A., and Hutchins, H. 2007. Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review 6: 263–296.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A., and Saks, A. M. 2009. Accountability in training transfer: Adapting Schlenker’s model of responsibility to a persistent but solvable problem. Human Resource Development Review 8: 382–402.Google Scholar

Burke, L. A., Hutchins, H., and Saks, A. 2013. Best practices in training transfer. In Paludi, M., ed., The Psychology for Business Success, 3, 115–132. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing.Google Scholar

Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., and Zajac, D. M. 1996. Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 26–48.Google Scholar

Chen, G., Gully, S.M., and Eden, D. 2001. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods 4: 62–83.Google Scholar

Cheramie, R., and Simmering, M. 2010. Improving individual learning for trainees with low conscientiousness. Journal of Managerial Psychology 25: 44–57.Google Scholar

Colquitt, J., LePine, J. A., and Noe, R. 2000. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of twenty years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 678–707.Google Scholar

CostaJr., P. T., McCrae, R. R., and Dye, D. A. 1991. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 12: 887–898.Google Scholar

Cromwell, S. E., and Kolb, J. A. 2004. An examination of work-environment support factors affecting transfer of supervisory skills training to the workplace. Human Resource Development Quarterly 15: 449–471.Google Scholar

Deci, E., and Ryan, R. 2002. Handbook of Self-determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

DeHart-Davis, L. 2009. Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 361–384.Google Scholar

DeMatteo, J., Lundby, K., and Dobbins, G. 1997. The effects of accountability on performance in training. Training Research Journal 3: 39–57.Google Scholar

Dose, J., and Klimoski, R. 1995. Doing the right thing in the workplace: Responsibility in the face of accountability. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 8: 35–56.Google Scholar

Frink, D., and Klimoski, R. 1998. Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 16: 1–51.Google Scholar

Gaudine, A. P., and Saks, A. M. 2004. A longitudinal quasi-experiment on the effects of posttraining transfer interventions. Human Resource Development Quarterly 15: 57–76.Google Scholar

Gist, M. E., and Mitchell, T. R. 1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review 17: 183–211.Google Scholar

Grossman, R., and Salas, E., 2011. The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development 15: 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilbert, J., Preskill, H., and Russ-Eft, D., eds., 1997. Evaluating Training. Alexandria, VA: ASTD.Google Scholar

Holton, E. F., Bates, R., and Ruona, W. E. A. 2000. Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly 11: 333–360.Google Scholar

Hutchins, H., Burke, L. A., and Berthelsen, A. M. 2010. A missing link in the transfer problem? Understanding how trainers learn about training transfer. Human Resource Management 49: 599–618.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., and Bono, J. E. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits–self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 80–92.Google Scholar

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., and Bono, J. E. 1998. The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance 11: 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., and Durham, C. C 1997. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior 19: 151–188.Google Scholar

Kopp, D. M. 2006. Trainer self-loathing. Human Resource Development Quarterly 17: 351–357.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., and Nason, E. R. 2001. Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85: 1–31.Google Scholar

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., and Salas, E. 1993. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 311–328.Google Scholar

Lim, D. H., and Johnson, S. D. 2002. Trainee perceptions of factors that influence learning transfer. International Journal of Training and Development 6: 36–48.Google Scholar

Longenecker, C. O. 2004. Maximizing transfer of learning from management education programs: Best practices for retention and application. Development and Learning in Organizations 18: 4–6.Google Scholar

Marx, R. D. 1982. Relapse prevention for managerial training: A model for maintenance of behavioral change. Academy of Management Review 7: 433–441.Google Scholar

Mathieu, J., and Martineau, J. 1997. Individual and situational influence on training motivation. In Ford, J. K., ed., Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations, 193–222. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Noe, R. A., Sears, J. A., and Fullenkamp, A. M. 1990. Relapse training: Does it influence trainees’ post-training behavior and cognitive strategies? Journal of Business and Psychology 4: 317–328.Google Scholar

Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., and Marand, A. D. 2013. Individual differences and informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 83: 327–335.Google Scholar

Parker, S. K., and Sprigg, C. A. 1999. Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 925–939.Google Scholar

Peterson, C., and Seligman, M. E. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Richman-Hirsch, W. L. 2001. Post-training interventions to enhance transfer: The moderating effects of work environments. Human Resource Development Quarterly 12: 105–120.Google Scholar

Rouiller, J. Z., and Goldstein, I. L. 1993. The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly 4: 377–390.Google Scholar

Saks, A. M. 2002. So what is a good transfer of training estimate? A reply to Fitzpatrick. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 39: 29–30.Google Scholar

Saks, A. M. and Belcourt, M. 2006. An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations. Human Resource Management 45: 629–648.Google Scholar

Saks, A. M., and Burke, L. A. 2012. An investigation into the relationship between training evaluation and the transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development 16: 118–127.Google Scholar

Santos, A., and Stuart, M. 2003. Employee perceptions and their influence on training effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal 13: 27–45.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. 1997. Personal responsibility: Applications of the triangle model. Research in Organizational Behavior 19: 241–301.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J. W., Murphy, R., and Doherty, K. J. 1994. The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review 101: 632–652.Google Scholar

Stajkovic, A. D., and Luthans, F. 1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124: 240–261.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., and Yukl, G. 1992. Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 399–441.Google Scholar

Taylor, P. J., Russ-Eft, D. F., and Chan, D. W. L. 2005. A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology 90: 692–709.Google Scholar

Tews, M. J., and Tracey, J. B. 2008. An empirical examination of posttraining on-the-job supplements for enhancing the effectiveness of interpersonal skills training. Personnel Psychology 61: 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., and Noe, R. A. 2011. Beyond objectivity: The performance impact of the perceived ability to learn and solve problems. Journal of Vocational Behavior 79: 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tracey, J. B., and Tews, M. J. 2005. Construct validity of a general training climate scale. Organizational Research Methods 8: 353–374.Google Scholar

Tracey, J. B, Tannenbaum, S., and Kavanagh, M. 1995. Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 239–252.Google Scholar

Tziner, A., Haccoun, R., and Kadish, A. 1991. Personal and situational characteristics influencing the effectiveness of transfer of training improvement strategies. Journal of Occupational Psychology 64: 167–177.Google Scholar

van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., and Lyles, M. A. 2008. Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies 45: 830–853.Google Scholar

Wexley, K. N., and Baldwin, T. T. 1986. Post-training strategies for facilitating positive transfer: An empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal 29: 508–520.Google Scholar

Wexley, K. N., and Nemeroff, W. 1975. Effectiveness of positive reinforcement and goal-setting as methods of management development. Journal of Applied Psychology 60: 446–450.Google Scholar

Wood, R., and Bandura, A. 1989. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review 14: 361–384.Google Scholar

Yelon, S., and Ford, K. 1999. Pursuing a multi-dimensional view of transfer. Performance Improvement Quarterly 12: 58–77.Google Scholar

Alexander, P. A. 2003. Development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher 32: 10–14.Google Scholar

Ansburg, P. I., and Dominowski, R. L. 2000. Promoting insightful problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior 34: 30–60.Google Scholar

Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., and Seibert, D. 2004. Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 344–370.Google Scholar

Barneff, S., and Koslowski, B. 2002. Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 237–267.Google Scholar

Barzilai, S., and Blau, I. 2014. Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers and Education 70: 65–79.Google Scholar

Bell, B. S., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2002. A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management 27(1): 14–49.Google Scholar

Bersin, J. 2009. Deep specialization for competitive advantage. http://www.astd.org/Publications/Newsletters/LX-Briefing/LXB-Archives/2009/11/Deep-Specialization-for-Competetive-Advantage (accessed November 27, 2009).Google Scholar

Bongers, P. J., Diederick van Hove, P., Stasssen, P. S., Dankelman, J., and Schreuder, H. 2015. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: Can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Surgical Education 72: 184–191.Google Scholar

Borton, G. 2007. Measuring the business impact of employee proficiency and employee job life cycle. Management Services (Autumn): 28–33.Google Scholar

Bowling, S. R., Khasawneh, M. T., Kaewkuekool, S., Jiang, X. C., and Gramopadhye, A. K. 2008. Evaluating the effects of virtual training in an aircraft maintenance task. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 18: 104–116.Google Scholar

Brooks, F. P. 1999. What’s real about virtual reality? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19(6): 16–27.Google Scholar

Burton, A. M., Shadbolt, N. R., Rugg, G., and Hedgecock, A. P. 1990. The efficacy of knowledge elicitation techniques: A comparison across domains and levels of expertise. Knowledge Acquisition 22: 167–178.Google Scholar

Byham, W. C. 2008. Strong Start to Job Success. White paper. Development Dimensions International, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Caligiuri, P., and Tarique, I. 2014. Individual-level accelerators of global leadership development. In Osland, J. S., Li, M, and Wang, Y, eds., Advances in Global Leadership, 8: 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., and van Merriënboer, J. J. 2014. How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review 12: 14–29.Google Scholar

Cerasoli, C. P., Alliger, G. M., Donsbach, J. S., Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S., and Orvis, K. A. 2014. What is informal learning and what are its antecedents? An integrative and meta-analytic review. Research Note 2014-03. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fort Belvoir, VA.Google Scholar

Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction 8: 293–332.Google Scholar

Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E., and Vasyukova, E. 2005. The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19: 151–165.Google Scholar

Chatham, R. E. (2009). The 20th century revolution in military training. Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments. In K. A. Ericsson, ed., Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments, 27–60. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cockayne, W., and Darken, R. 2004. The application of human ability requirements to virtual environment interface design and evaluation. In D. Diaper and N. Stanton, eds., The Handbook of Task Analysis of Human Computer Interaction, 401–421. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Dall’Alba, G., and Sandberg, J. 2006. Unveiling professional development: A critical view of stage models. Review of Educational Research 76: 383–412.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Flanders, J. L., and Peterson, J. B. 2008. Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20: 278–290.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. 2006. Intuitive, deliberative, and calculative models of expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., and Hoffman, R. R., eds., Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 17–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L., and Dreyfus, S. E. 1986. Mind over Machine. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L., and Dreyfus, S. E. 2005. Peripheral vision expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies 26: 779–792.Google Scholar

Ellis, S., and Davidi, I. 2005. After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(5): 857–871.Google Scholar

Ely, K., Zaccaro, S. J., and Conjar, E. A. 2009. Leadership development: Training design strategies for growing adaptability in leaders. In C. Cooper and R. Burke, eds., The Peak Performing Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ericsson, E. 1996. The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. 2004. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine 79: S70–S81.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. 2006. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., and Hoffman, R. R., eds., Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 683–706. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., and Charness, N. 1994. Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist 49: 725.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., and Tesch-Römer, C. 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100: 363–406.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., and Roring, R. W. 2009. Toward a science of exceptional achievement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1172: 199–217.Google Scholar

Fadde, P. J., and Klein, G. A. 2010. Deliberate performance: Accelerating expertise in natural settings. Performance Improvement 49: 5–14.Google Scholar

Farrington-Darby, T., and Wilson, J. R. 2006. The nature of expertise: A review. Applied Ergonomics 37: 17–32.Google Scholar

Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., and Fiore, S. 2012. Differential impact of two types of metacognitive prompting provided during simulation-based training. Computers in Human Behavior 28: 696–702.Google Scholar

Ford, J. K., and Kraiger, K. 1995. The application of cognitive constructs to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T., eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1–48. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ford, J. K., and Meyer, T. 2014. Advances in training technology: Meeting the workplace challenges of talent development, deep specialization and collaborative learning. In M. D. Coovert and L. F. Thompson, eds., The Psychology of Workplace Technology, 43–76. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ford, J. K., and Schmidt, A. M. 2000. Emergency response training: Strategies for enhancing real-world performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials 75: 195–215.Google Scholar

Ford, J. K., Quiñones, M. A., Sego, D. J. and Sorra, J. S. 1992. Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology 45: 511–527.Google Scholar

Germain, M. L., and Tejeda, M. J. 2012. A preliminary exploration on the measurement of expertise: An initial development of a psychometric scale. Human Resource Development Quarterly 23: 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gladwell, M. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Glaser, R., and Chi, M. T. H. 1988. Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R., Glaser, and M. J. Farr, eds., The Nature of Expertise, XV–XXVIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K., Anand, D. K., Brough, J. E., Schwartz, M., and Kavetsky, R. A. 2008. Training in Virtual Environments. College Park, MD: Calce Press.Google Scholar

Hague, S., and Srinivasan, S. 2006. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 10: 51–58.Google Scholar

Hatano, G., and Inagaki, K. 1986. Two courses of expertise. In Stevenson, H., Azuma, J., and Hakuta, K., eds., Child Development and Education in Japan, 262–272. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R. 1996. How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., and Fleck, J., eds., Exploring Expertise, 81–100. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., ed., 2007. Expertise Out of Context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., and Hanes, L. F. 2003. The boiled frog problem. IEEE: Intelligent Systems (July–August): 68–71.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., Ford, K. M., and Novak, J. D. 2006. A method for eliciting, preserving, and sharing the knowledge of forecasters. Weather and Forecasting 21: 416–428.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., and Klein, G. 1995. Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62: 129–158.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Ward, P., Feltovich, P. J., DiBello, L., Fiore, S. M., and Andrews, D. H. 2014. Accelerated Expertise. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Holyoak, K. J. 1991. Symbolic connectionism: Toward third generation theories of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. and Smith, J., eds., Towards a General Theory of Expertise, 301–335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, S. D., Wickens, C. D., Carolan, T. F., and Cumming, J. M. 2013. The influence of cognitive load on transfer with error prevention training methods: A meta-analysis. Human Factors 55: 864–874.Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Risk Management of Knowledge Loss in Nuclear Industry Organizations. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar

Jacobs, R., Kafry, D., and Zedeck, S. 1980. Expectations of behaviorally anchored rating scales. Personnel Psychology 33: 595–640.Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S. 2007. Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review 19: 509–539.Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 2003. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38: 23–31.Google Scholar

Kanar, A. M., and Bell, B. S. 2013. Guiding learners through technology-based instruction: The effects of adaptive guidance design and individual differences on learning over time. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4): 1067–1081.Google Scholar

Kim, Y., and Ployhart, R. E. 2014. The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during, and after the Great Recession. Journal of Applied Psychology 99: 361–389.Google Scholar

Kinchin, I. M., and Cabot, L. B. 2010. Reconsidering the dimensions of expertise: From linear stages towards dual processing. London Review of Education 8: 153–166.Google Scholar

Kinicki, A. J., Bannister, B. D., Hom, P. W., and DeNisi, A. S. 1985. Behaviorally anchored rating scales vs. summated rating scales: Psychometric properties and susceptibility to rating bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement 45: 535–549.Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., and van Merriёnboer, J. J. G. 2008. Ten steps to complex learning: A new approach to instruction and instructional design. In Good, T. L., ed., 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, 244–253. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41: 75–86.Google Scholar

Klein, G. 1997. Developing expertise in decision making. Thinking and Reasoning 3: 337–352.Google Scholar

Klein, G. 2004. The Power of Intuition. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Klein, G. A., and Hoffman, R. R. 1993. Seeing the invisible: The perceptual cognitive aspect of expertise. In Rabinowitz, M., ed., Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction, 203–226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., and Klahr, D. 2008. Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science 342: 935–937.Google Scholar

Kraiger, K., and Ford, J. K. 2007. The expanding role of workplace training: Themes and trends influencing training research and practice. In Koppes, L. L, ed., Historical Perspectives in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 281–309. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Lajoie, S. P. 2003. Transitions and trajectories for studies of expertise. Educational Researcher 32: 21–25.Google Scholar

Larsen, C. R., Oestergaard, J., Ottesen, B. S., and Soerensen, J. L. 2012. The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: A systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 91: 1015–1028.Google Scholar

Larsen, C. R., Soerensen, J. L., Grantcharov, T. P., Dalsgaard, T., Schouenborg, L., Ottosen, C., Schroeder, T. V., and Ottesen, B. S. 2009. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: Randomized controlled trial. BMJ 338: b1802.Google Scholar

Lord, R.G. and Hall, R.J. 2005. Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skills. The Leadership Quarterly 16: 591–615.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist 59(1): 14–19.Google Scholar

McCall, M. W. 2004. Leadership development through experience. The Academy of Management Executive 18: 127–130.Google Scholar

McCauley, C. D., and Brutus, S. 1998. Management Development Through Job Experiences. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar

McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., and Morrow, J. E. 1994. Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 544–560.Google Scholar

McGaghie, W. D., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E., Barsuk, J. H., and Wayne, D. B. 2012. Does simulation based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academy Medical 86: 706–711.Google Scholar

McKenzie, J., Woolf, N., van Winkelen, C., and Morgan, C. 2009. Cognition in strategic decision making. A model of non-conventional thinking capacities for complex situations. Cognition in Strategic Decision Making 27: 209–232.Google Scholar

Moon, B., Hoffman, R., and Ziebell, D. 2009. How did you do that? Utilities develop strategies for preserving and sharing expertise. Electric Perspectives 34 (January–February): 20–29.Google Scholar

Najjar, M. 2008. On scaffolding adaptive teaching prompts within virtual labs. International Journals of Distance Education Technologies 6(2): 35–54.Google Scholar

Nelson, J. K., Zaccaro, S. J., and Herman, J. L. 2010. Strategic information provision and experiential variety as tools for developing adaptive leadership skills. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 62: 131–142.Google Scholar

Ohlsson, S. 1992. Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane and K. J. Gilhooly, eds., Advances in the Psychology of Thinking, 1–44. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Oransanu, J., and Connolly, T. 1993. The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Oransanu, R. Calderwood, and C. E. Zsambok, eds., Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, 3–20. Norwood, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Prietula, M. J., and Simon, H. A. 1989. The experts in your midst. Harvard Business Review 67: 120–124.Google Scholar

Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., and Baxter, G. P. 2000. Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In Schraw, G. and Impara, J. C., eds., Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, 43–97. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., and Plamondon, K. E. 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 612–624.Google Scholar

Quinn, R. E., and Cameron, K. S. 1988. Paradox and transformation: A framework for viewing organization and management. In R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron, eds., Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., and Teachout, M. S. 1995. The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology 48: 887–910.Google Scholar

Salas, E., and Rosen, M. A. 2009. Experts at work: Principles for developing expertise in organizations. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 99–134. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Schaefer, P. S., Shadrick, S. B., Beaubien, J., and Crabb, B. T. 2008. Training effectiveness assessment of Red Cape: Crisis action planning of execution (Research Report 1885). Arlington, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. 1993. Career Anchors, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Shadrick, S. B., and Lussier, J. W. 2004. Assessment of the “think like a commander” training program. Research Report 1824. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

Shadrick, S. B., and Lussier, J. W. 2009. Training complex cognitive skills: A theme-based approach to the development of battlefield skills. In Ericson, K. A., ed., Development of Professional Expertise, 286–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shadrick, S. B., Lussier, J. W., and Fultz, C. 2007. Accelerating the development of adaptive performance: Validating the Think Like a Commander training (ARI Research Report 1868). Arlington, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Shea, J. B., and Morgan, R. L. 1979. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 179–187.Google Scholar

Smith, E., Ford, J. K., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 1997. Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In Quiñones, M. and Ehrenstein, A., eds., Training for the 21st Century: Applications of Psychological Research, 89–118. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S. 1995. Excellent software professionals: Experience, work activities, and perceptions by peers. Behaviour and Information Technology 14: 289–299.Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S. 1998. Expertise in professional software design: A process study. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 703–715.Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S. 2000. Expertise at work: Experience and excellent performance. In Cooper, C. and Robertson, I., eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 15: 223–264. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Sonnentag, S., and Kleine, B. 2000. Deliberate performance at work: A study with insurance agents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73: 87–102.Google Scholar

Sung, S. Y., and Choi, J. N. 2014. Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35: 393–412.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., and Cerasoli, C. P. 2013. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors 55: 231–245.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, M., and Salas, 2010. Informal learning and development in organizations. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E., eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 303–332. New York: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar

Taylor, P. J., Russ-Eft, D. F., and Chan, D. W. 2005. A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 692–709.Google Scholar

Tesluk, P. E., and Jacobs, R. R. 1998. Toward an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology 51: 321–355.Google Scholar

Van den Bosch, K., and de Beer, M. M. 2007. Playing a winning game: An implementation of critical thinking training. In R. R. Hoffman, ed., Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalist Decision Making, 177–198. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. 2000. The development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. High Ability Studies 11: 9–39.Google Scholar

Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. and Verhelst, N. D. 2002. The psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional measurement instrument of professional expertise. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 18: 165–178.Google Scholar

Van der Maas, H. L. J., and Wagenmakers, E. 2005. A psychometric analysis of chess expertise. American Journal of Psychology 118: 29–60.Google Scholar

van Merriёnboer, J. J., and Kirshchner, P. A. 2007. Ten Steps to Complex Learning. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., and Kester, L. 2003. Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38: 5–13.Google Scholar

Weiss, D. J., and Shanteau, J. 2003. Empirical assessment of expertise. Human Factors 45: 104–116.Google Scholar

Wulf, G., and Shea, C. H. 2002. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 185–211.Google Scholar

Young, J. Q., van Merriёnboer, J., Durning, S., and Cate, O. T. 2014. Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE guide no. 86. Medical Teacher 36: 371–384.Google Scholar

Zaccaro, S. J., Banks, D., Kiechel-Koles, L., Kemp, C., and Bader, P. 2009. Leader and team adaptation: The influences and development of key attributes and processes. Tech. Rep. No. #1256. U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Ziebell, D. 2008. Program on Technology Innovation: Accelerating the Achievement of Mission-Critical Expertise: A Research Roadmap. Report 1016710. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J., Sestokas, J. M., Burns, C. A., Bell, J., and Manning, D. 2012. Methods and tools for training crisis response. Research Note 2012-07. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar

Zwick, T. 2006. The impact of training intensity on establishment productivity. Industrial Relations 45: 26–46.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, R., Ward, J., Balasundaram, I., Sains, P., Athanasiou, T., and Darzi, A. 2007. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Annals of Surgery 246(5): 771–779.Google Scholar

Aguinis, H., and Kraiger, K. 2009. Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 451–474.Google Scholar

Alessi, S. 2000. Designing educational support in system-dynamics-based interactive learning environments. Simulation and Gaming 31(2): 178–196.Google Scholar

Andreatta, P., Chen, Y., Marsh, M., and Cho, K. 2011. Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs. Supportive Care in Cancer 19(4): 539–543.Google Scholar

Annett, J. 1969. Feedback and Human Behaviour: The Effect of Knowledge of Results, Incentives and Reinforcement on Learning and Performance. Oxford: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Arafeh, J. M. R., Hansen, S. S., and Nichols, A. 2010. Debriefing in simulated-based learning: Facilitating a reflective discussion. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 24(4): 302–311.Google Scholar

ArthurJr., W., Bennett Jr., W., Edens, P. S., and Bell, S. T. 2003. Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 234–245.Google Scholar

Association for Talent Development. 2014. 2014 State of the Industry Report. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar

Baker, D., Prince, C., Shrestha, L., Oser, R., and Salas, E. 1993. Aviation computer games for crew resource management training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(2): 143–156.Google Scholar

Beaubien, J. M., and Baker, D. 2004. The use of simulation for training skills in health care: How low can they go? Quality and Safety in Health Care 13: 151–156.Google Scholar

Bell, B. S., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2007. Advances in technology-based training. In Werner, S., ed., Managing Human Resources in North America, 27–42. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 2008. Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. International Journal of Human Resource Management 19(8): 1416–1436.Google Scholar

Bernardin, H. J., and Beatty, R. W. 1984. Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work. Boston: Kent Pub Co.Google Scholar

Blackmur, J. P., Clement, R. G. E., Brady, R. R. W., and Oliver, C. W. 2013. Surgical training 2.0: How contemporary developments in information technology can augment surgical training. The Surgeon, Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburge and Ireland 11(2): 105–112.Google Scholar

Bogdanowicz, M. S., and Bailey, E. K. 2002. The value of knowledge and the values of the new knowledge worker: Generation X in the new economy. Journal of European Industrial Training 26(2/3/4): 125–129.Google Scholar

Bowers, C. A., and Jentsch, F. 2001. Use of commercial, off-the-shelf, simulations for team research. In Salas, E, ed., Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, 1, 293–317. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.Google Scholar

Bowers, C. A., Salas, E., Prince, C., and Brannick, M. 1992. Games teams play: A method for investigating team coordination and performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 24: 503–506.Google Scholar

Breaugh, J. A., and Starke, M. 2005. Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management 26(3): 405–434.Google Scholar

Brown, K. G. 2001. Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology 54: 271–296.Google Scholar

Burke, R. J., and Ng, E. 2006. The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review 16(2): 86–94.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Bowers, C. 2009. Synthetic learning environments: On developing a science of simulation, games, and virtual worlds for training. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Salas, E, eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 229–261. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Cohen, I., Iluz, M., and Shtub, A. 2014. A simulation-based approach in support of project management training for systems engineers. Systems Engineering 17(1): 26–36.Google Scholar

Cook, D. A., Dupras, D. M., Beckman, T. J., Thomas, K. G., and Pankratz, V. P. 2009. Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(1): 74–79.Google Scholar

Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32(5): 554–571.Google Scholar

Day, R. D. 2014. Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Deering, S., Brown, J., Hodor, J., and Satin, A. J. 2007. Simulation training and resident performance of singleton vaginal breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 107(1): 86–89.Google Scholar

Devine, D. J., Habig, J. K., Martin, K. E., Bott, J. P., and Grayson, A. L. 2004. Tinsel town: A top management simulation involving distributed expertise. Simulation and Gaming 35(1): 94–134.Google Scholar

Fanning, R. M., and Gaba, D. M. 2007. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare 2(2): 115–125.Google Scholar

Faria, A. J., and Dickinson, J. R. 1994. Simulation gaming for sales management training. Journal of Management Development 13(1): 47–59.Google Scholar

Fowlkes, J., Dwyer, D. J., Oser, R. L., and Salas, E. 1998. Event-based approach to training (EBAT). The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 8(3): 209–221.Google Scholar

Fripp, J. 1997. A future for business simulations? Journal of European Industrial Training 21(4): 138–142.Google Scholar

Funke, J. 1998. Computer-based testing and training with scenarios from complex problem-solving research: Advantages and disadvantages. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 6(2): 90–96.Google Scholar

Gaba, D. M., Howard, S. K., Fish, K. J., Smith, B. E., and Sowb, Y. A. 2001. Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation and Gaming 32(2): 175–193.Google Scholar

Goldstein, I. L. 1991. Training in work organizations. In Dunnette, M. D. and Hough, L. M., eds., Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., 2: 507–620. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. A., Wilkerson, W. M., Shaffer, D. W., and Armstrong, E. G. 2001. “Practicing” medicine without risk: Students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine 76(5): 469–472.Google Scholar

Hasenbosch, S., and Ross, P. 2013. Communication analysis for virtual mission preparation: Moving beyond simple replay. Proceeding of SimTecT, 62–68. Adelaide: Simulation Australia.Google Scholar

Hatala, R., Cook, D. A., Zandejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., and Rydges, R. 2014. Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Advances in Health Sciences Education 19(2): 251–272.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. L., Youngblood, P., Harter, P. M., and Dev, P. 2008. Simulation for team training and assessment: Case studies of online training with virtual worlds. World Journal of Surgery 32: 161–170.Google Scholar

Helmreich, R. L. 1997. Managing human error in aviation. Scientific American 276(5): 62–67.Google Scholar

Holt, R. W., Hansberger, J. T., and Boehm-Davis, D. A. 2002. Improving rater calibration in aviation: A case study. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 12(3): 305–330.Google Scholar

Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., and Palmer, A. 2014. Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 99(1): 162–179.Google Scholar

Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., and Taylor, M. S. 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 64: 349–371.Google Scholar

Jacobs, R. L., and Baum, M. 1987. Simulation and games in training and development: Status and concerns about their use. Simulation and Games 18(3): 385–94.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. E., Lombardo, M. M., and Mazique, M. S. 1985. A mirror for managers: Using simulation to develop management teams. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 21(3): 241–253.Google Scholar

Karim, M. N., and Behrend, T S. 2014. Reexamining the nature of learner control: Dimensionality and effects on learning and training reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology 29: 87–99.Google Scholar

Keith, N., and Frese, M. 2008. Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 59–69.Google Scholar

Keys, B., and Wolfe, J. 1990. The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management 16: 307–336.Google Scholar

Klein, K. J., and Kozlowski, S. W. J., eds., 2000. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119(2): 254–284.Google Scholar

Komaki, J., Heinzmann, A. T., and Lawson, L. 1980. Effect of training and feedback: Component analysis of a behavioral safety program. Journal of Applied Psychology 65(3): 261–270.Google Scholar

Kopelman, R. E. 1986. Managing Productivity in Organizations: A Practical, People-Oriented Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Koppenhaver, G. D. 1993. An evaluation of three bank management simulations: Preliminary results. Financial Practice and Education 3(2): 89–96.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., and Bell, B. S. 2007. A theory-based approach for designing distributed learning systems. In Fiore, S. M. and Salas, E, eds., Toward a Science of Distributed Learning, 15–39. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., and DeShon, R. P. 2004. a psychological fidelity approach to simulation-based training: Theory, research and principles. In Schiflett, S. G., Elliott, L. R., Salas, E, and Coovert, M. D., eds., Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Applications, 75–99. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kraiger, K., and Jerden, E. 2007. A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. In Fiore, S. M. and Salas, E, eds., Toward a Science of Distributed Learning, 65–90. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Lane, D. C. 1995. On a resurgence of management simulations and games. The Journal of Operational Research Society 46(5): 604–625.Google Scholar

Lederman, L. C. 1983. Differential learning outcomes in an instructional simulation: Exploring the relationship between designated role and perceived learning outcome. Communications Quarterly 32: 198–204.Google Scholar

Lepper, M. R., and Malone, T. W. 1987. Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In Snow, R. E. and Farr, M. J., eds., Aptitude, Learning, and Instructions: Cognitive and Affective Process Analysis, 255–286. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lievens, F. 2001. Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(2): 255–264.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. 1990. Work motivation and satisfaction: The light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science 1(4): 240–246.Google Scholar

McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., and Scalese, R. J. 2006. Effect of practice on standardized learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education 40(8): 792–797.Google Scholar

McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., and Scalese, R. J. 2010. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Medical Education 44(1): 50–63.Google Scholar

McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., and Wayne, D. B. 2011. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine 86(6): 706–711.Google Scholar

McKinney, J., Cook, D. A., Wood, D., and Hatala, R. 2013. Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(2): 283–291.Google Scholar

Meyer, G. F., Wong, L. T., Timson, E., Perfect, P., and White, M. D. 2012. Objective fidelity evaluation in multisensory environments: Auditory cue fidelity in flight simulation. PloS ONE 7(9): 1–14.Google Scholar

Moore, M. L., and Dutton, P. 1978. Training needs analysis: Review and critique. Academy of Management Review 3(3): 532–545.Google Scholar

Moorthy, K., Vincent, C., and Darzi, A. 2005. Simulation-based training is being extended from training individuals to teams. BMJ: British Medical Journal 330(7490): 493–494.Google Scholar

Motola, I., Devine, L. A., Chung, H. S., Sullivan, J. E., and Issenberg, S. B. 2013. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher 35(10): e1511–e1530.Google Scholar

Norman, G., Dore, K., and Grierson, L. 2012. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical Education 46(7): 636–647.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. M. 1998. Effects of realistic job previews on multiple organizational outcomes: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Journal 41(6): 673–690.Google Scholar

Preisler, L., Svendsen, M. B. S., Nerup, N., Svendsen, L. B., and Konge, L. 2015. Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: Establishing criteria for competency. Medicine 94(4): e440.Google Scholar

Premack, S. L., and Wanous, J. P. 1985. A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology 70(4): 706–719.Google Scholar

Rehmann, A. J., Mitman, R. D., and Reynolds, M. C. 1995. A Handbook of Flight Simulation Fidelity Requirements for Human Factors Research. Technical Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN95/46. Wright-Patterson, AFB, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomics Information Analysis Center.Google Scholar

Reichard, R. J., Serrano, S. A., and Wefald, A. J. 2013. Engaging followers at a distance: Leadership approaches that work. In Bligh, M. C. and Riggio, R. E., eds., Exploring Distance in Leader-Follow Relationships: When Near Is Far and Far Is Near, 107–135. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., King, H. B., Salisbury, M., Augenstein, J., Robinson, D. W., and Birnbach, D. J. 2008. Measuring team performance in simulation-based training: Adopting best practices for healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare 3(1): 33–41.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Weaver, S. J., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Wu, T., Silvestri, S., Schiebel, N., Almedia, S., and King, H. B. 2010. Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation-based performance. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock 3(4): 353–359.Google Scholar

Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Rivard, P., Dufresne, R. L., and Raemer, D. B. 2007. Debriefing with good judgment: Combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics 25(2): 361–376.Google Scholar

Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J. A. 2001. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 471–499.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., and Rhodenizer, L. 1998. It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 8(3): 197–208.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., and Piccolo, R. F. 2009. Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 8(4): 559–573.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Held, J. D., and Weissmuller, J. J. 2009. Performance measurement in simulation-based training: A review and best practices. Simulation and Gaming 40(3): 328–376.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Burke, C. S., and Priest, H. A. 2005. Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: What does it take? Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 31(7): 363–371.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. A., and Bjork, R. A. 1992. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 3(4): 207–217.Google Scholar

Schreiber, B. T., Watz, B. A., and Winston, B. 2003. Objective human performance measurement in distributed environment: Tomorrow’s needs. Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference. Orlando, FL: National Security Industrial Association. http://www.iitsecdocs.com/volumes/2003 (accessed April 18, 2017).Google Scholar

Shapiro, M. J., Morey, J. C., Small, S. D., Langford, V., Kaylor, C. J., Suner, S., Salisbury, M. L., Simon, R., and Jay, G. D. 2004. Simulation-based teamwork training for emergency department staff: Does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? Quality and Safety in Health Care 13(6): 417–421.Google Scholar

Shetty, S., Zevin, B., Grantcharov, T. P., Roberts, K. E., and Duffy, A. J. 2014. Perceptions, training experiences, and preferences of surgical residents toward laparoscopic simulation training: A resident survey. Journal of Surgical Education 71(5): 727–733.Google Scholar

Singer, B. D., Corbridge, T. C., Schroedl, C. J., Wilcox, J. E., Cohen, E. R., McGaghie, W. C., and Wayne, D. B. 2013. First-year residents outperform third-year residents after simulation-based education in critical care medicine. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 8(2): 67.Google Scholar

Steadman, R. H., Coates, W. C., Huang, Y. M., Matevosian, R., Larmon, B. R., McCullough, L., and Ariel, D. 2006. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Critical Care Medicine 34(1): 151–157.Google Scholar

Summers, G. J. 2004. Today’s business simulation industry. Simulation and Gaming 35(2): 208–241.Google Scholar

Sweeney, L. A., Warren, O., Gardner, L., Rojek, A., and Lindquist, D G. 2014. A simulation-based training program improves emergency department staff communication. American Journal of Medical Quality 29(2): 115–123.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., and Yukl, G. 1992. Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology 43(1): 399–441.Google Scholar

Thornton, G. C., and Cleveland, J N. 1990. Developing managerial talent through simulation. American Psychologist 45(2) :190–199.Google Scholar

Tokaji, M., Ninomiya, S., Kurosaki, T., Orihasi, K., and Sueda, T. 2012. An educational training simulator for advanced perfusion techniques using a high-fidelity virtual patient model. Artificial Organs 36(12): 1026–1035.Google Scholar

TRADOC. 2011. The U.S. Army learning concept for 2015. TRADOC PAM 525-8-2. http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/pams/tp525-8-2_CH1.pdf (accessed April 18, 2017).Google Scholar

Wahr, J. E., Prager, R. L., AbernathyIII, J. H., Martinez, E. A., Salas, E., Seifert, P. C., Groom, R. C., Spiess, B. D., Searles, B. E., SundtIII, T. M., Sanchez, J. A., Shappell, S. A., Culig, M. H., Lazzara, E. H., Fitzgerald, D. C., Thourani, B. H., Eghtesady, P., Ikonomidis, J. S., England, M. R., Sellke, F. W., and Nussmeier, N. A. 2013. Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: Human factors and teamwork a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128(10): 1139–1169.Google Scholar

Washbush, J., and Gosen, J. 2001. An exploration of game-derived learning in total enterprise simulations. Simulation and Gaming 32(3): 281–296.Google Scholar

Watling, C., Driessen, E., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., and Lingard, L. 2012. Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgments. Medical Education 46(2): 192–200.Google Scholar

Weaver, S. J., Salas, E., Lyons, R., Lazzara, E. H., Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Grim, J. G., Augenstein, J. S., Birnbach, D. J., and King, H. 2010. Simulation-based team training at the sharp end: A qualitative study of simulation-based team training design, implementation, and evaluation in healthcare. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock 3(4): 369–377.Google Scholar

Wideman, H. H., Owston, R. D., Brown, C., Kushniruk, A., Ho, F., and Pitts, K. C. 2007. Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research. Simulation and Gaming 38(1): 10–30.Google Scholar

Woehr, D. J., and Huffcutt, A. I. 1994. Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 67(3): 189–205.Google Scholar

Wulf, G., and Shea, C. H. 2004. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Williams, A. M and Hodges, N. J., eds., Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Feedback, and Practice, 121–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wynder, M. 2004. Facilitating creativity in management accounting: A computerized business simulation. Accounting Education 13(2): 231–250.Google Scholar

Zantow, K., Knowlton, D. S., and Sharp, D. C. 2005. More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(4): 451–458.Google Scholar

Zendejas, B., Brydges, R., Hamstra, S., and Cook, D. A. 2013. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review. Annals of Surgery 257(4): 586–593.Google Scholar

Zevin, B., Aggarwal, R., and Grantcharov, T. P. 2012. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. British Journal of Surgery 99(7): 887–895.Google Scholar

Zwikael, O., and Sadeh, A. 2007. Planning effort as an effective risk management tool. Journal of Operations Management 25(4): 755–767.Google Scholar

Alaraj, A., Charbel, F. T., Birk, D., Tobin, M., Luciano, C., Banerjee, P. P., ..., Roitberg, B. 2013. Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery 72(1): 115–123.Google Scholar

Albrecht, U.-V., Folta-Schoofs, K., Behrends, M., and von Jan, U. 2013. Effect of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: Randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(8): e182.Google Scholar

Azuma, R. 1993. Tracking requirements for augmented reality. Real World: Communications of the ACM 36(7): 50–51.Google Scholar

Azuma, R. T. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4): 355–385.Google Scholar

Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Reynard, G., Brown, C., and Koleva, B. 1998. Understanding and constructing shared spaces with mixed-reality boundaries. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 5(3):185–223.Google Scholar

Blum, T., Kleeberger, V., Bichlmeier, C., and Navab, N. 2012. Miracle: An augmented reality magic mirror system for anatomy education. IEEE Virtual Reality: 115–116.Google Scholar

Boud, A. C., Haniff, D. J, Baber, C. and Steiner, S. J. 1999. Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization: 32–36.Google Scholar

Bruellmann, D. D., Tjaden, H., Schwanecke, U., and Barth, P. 2013. An optimized video system for augmented reality in endodontics: A feasibility study. Clinical Oral Investigations 17: 441–448.Google Scholar

Caudell, T. P. and Mizell, D. W. 1992. Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In Proc. Hawaii Int’l Conf. on Systems Sciences: 659–669. Kauai, Hawaii: IEEE CS Press.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. J., Kang, Y. S., and Huang, P. C. 2013. An augmented reality (AR)-based vocational task prompting system for people with cognitive impairments. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34(10): 3049–3056.Google Scholar

Chang, G., Morreale, P., and Medicherla, P. 2010. Applications of augmented reality systems in education. In Gibson, D. and Dodge, B., eds., Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 1380–1385. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar

Chien, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., and Jeng, T.-S. 2010. An interactive augmented reality system for learning anatomy structure. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 1: 1–6.Google Scholar

Dieterle, E. 2009. Neomillennial learning styles and River City. Children Youth and Environments 19(1): 245–278.Google Scholar

Dixon, B. J., Daly, M. J., Chan, H., Vescan, A. D., Witterick, I. J., and Irish, J. C. 2013. Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: The effect of augmented reality on attention. Surgical Endoscopy 27: 454–461.Google Scholar

Fiore, S., and Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. 2010. Making metacognition explicit: Developing a theoretical foundation for metacognitive prompting during scenario-based training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 54(27): 2233–2237.Google Scholar

Goldstein, I. L., and Ford, J. K. 2002. The needs assessment phase. Training in Organizations, 34–84. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, P. J., Fiore, S. M., Klein, G., and Ziebell, D. 2009. Accelerated learning. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 24(2): 18–22.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. R., Ward, P., Feltovich, P. J., DiBello, L., Fiore, S. M., and Andrews, D. H. 2013. Accelerated Learning: Training for High Proficiency in a Complex World. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hou, L., and Wang, X. 2010. Using augmented reality to cognitively facilitate product assembly process. In S. Maad, ed., Augmented Reality, 99–112. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/6761/InTech-Using_augmented_reality_to_cognitively_facilitate_product_assembly_process.pdf.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. 1995. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science 19(3): 265–288.Google Scholar

Janssen, J. H., Tacken, P., de Vries, J. J. G., van den Broek, E. L., Westerink, J. H., Haselager, P., and Ijsselsteijn, W. A. 2013. Machines outperform laypersons in recognizing emotions elicited by autobiographical recollection. Human–Computer Interaction 28(6): 479–517.Google Scholar

Kang, X., Azizian, M., Wilson, E., Wu, K., Martin, A. D., Kane, T. D., ..., Shekhar, R. 2014. Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 28: 2227–2235.Google Scholar

Keebler, J. R., Wiltshire, T. J., Smith, D., Fiore, S. M., and Bedwell, J. S. 2014. Shifting the paradigm of music instruction: Implications of embodiment stemming from an augmented reality guitar learning system. Frontiers in Psychology. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 5: 471.Google Scholar

Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., and Sebanz, N. 2011. Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In Ross, Brian H., ed., Advances in Research and Theory, 59–101. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Van Krevelen, D. W. F., and Poleman, R. 2010. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications, and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 9(2): 1–20.Google Scholar

Liarokapis, F., Mourkoussis, N., White, M., Darcy, J., Sifniotis, M., Petridis, P., ... Lister, P. 2004. Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 3(1). Melbourne, Australia: UICEE.Google Scholar

Lopez-Mir, F., Naranko, V., Fuertes, J. J., Alcaniz, M., Bueno, J., and Pareja, E. 2013. Design and validation of an augmented reality system for laparoscopic surgery in a real environment. BioMed Research International 2013: 1–12.Google Scholar

Lydens, L., Saito, Y., and Inoue, T. 2007. Digital technology at the National Science Museum of Japan. Journal of Museum Education 32(1): 7–16.Google Scholar

Malone, T. W., and Crowston, K. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 26(1): 87–119.Google Scholar

Marzano, E., Piardi, T., Soler, L., Diana, M., Mutter, D., Marescaux, J., and Pessaux, P. 2013. Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreatico-duodenectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 17: 1980–1983.Google Scholar

Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., and Kishino, F. 1994. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies 2351: 282–292.Google Scholar

Mistry, P., Maes, P, and Chang, L. 2009. WUW – wear Ur World: A wearable gestural interface. Proceedings CHI EA: 4111–4116.Google Scholar

Newman, L. H. 2014. Dubai police will wear Google Glass with facial recognition software to ID crooks. Slate. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/10/03/dubai_police_will_use_facial_recognition_and_google_glass_to_look_for_wanted.html (accessed September 17, 2016).Google Scholar

Radu, I. 2014. Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal Ubiquitous Computing: 1–11.Google Scholar

Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., and Gibson, C. 2008. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review 33(1): 163–184.Google Scholar

Samosky, J. T., Nelson, D. A., Wang, B., Bregman, R., Hosmer, A., Mikulis, B., and Weaver, R. 2012. BodyExplorerAR: Enhancing a mannequin medical simulator with sensing and projective augmented reality for exploring dynamic anatomy and physiology. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction: 263–270.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. E. 1995. The growing reality of virtual reality. BioScience, 45(7): 435–439.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. G., John, N. W., and Delieu, J. M. 2010. Augmented reality for anatomical education. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 33(1): 6–15.Google Scholar

Ungi, T., Yeo, C. T., U-Thainual, P., McGraw, R. C., and Fichtinger, G. 2011. Augmented reality needle guidance improves facet joint injection training. Proceedings of SPIE 7964, Medical Imaging 2011: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling: 79642E.Google Scholar

Vera, A. M., Russo, M., Mohsin, A., and Tsuda, S. 2014. Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology. Surgical Endoscopy 28: 3467–3472.Google Scholar

Volonte, F., Pugin, F., Bucher, P., Sugimoto, M., Ratib, O., and Morel, P. 2011. Augmented reality and image overlay navigation with OsiriX in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: Not only a matter of fashion. Journal of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Science 18: 506–509.Google Scholar

von Jan, U., Noll, C., Behrends, M., and Albrecht, U.-V. 2012. mARble: Augmented reality in medical education. Biomedical Technology 57: 67–70.Google Scholar

Wilson, K. M., Helton, W. S., and Wiggins, M. W. 2013. Cognitive engineering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4(1): 17–31.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, T. J., Rosch, K., Fiorella, L., and Fiore, S. M. (2014). Training for collaborative problem solving improving team process and performance through metacognitive prompting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58(1): 1154–1158.Google Scholar

Yudkowsky, R., Luciano, C., Banerjee, P., Schwartz, A., Alaraj, A., Lemole, G. M., ... Frim, D. 2013. Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improved residents’ ability to perform a ventriculostomy. Simulation in healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 8(1): 25–31.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, S. H., Marchionni, A., and Fernandez, A. 2008. The multi-tasking paradox: Perceptions, problems, and strategies. Management Decision 46(9):1313–1325.Google Scholar

Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., and Huang, J. L. 2010. Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management 36(4): 1065–1105.Google Scholar

Brown, K. G., Charlier, S., and Pierotti, A. 2012. E-Learning at work: Contributions of past research and suggestions for the future. In Hodgkinson, G. P. and Ford, J. K., eds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 27: 89–114.Google Scholar

Brown, K. G., Howardson, G., and Fisher, S. L. 2016. learner control and e-learning: Taking stock and moving forward. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3: 267–291.Google Scholar

Chang, L. W., Njie-Carr, V., Kalenge, S., Kelly, J. F., Bollinger, R. C., and Alamo-Talisuna, S. 2013. Perceptions and acceptability of mHealth interventions for improving patient care at a community-based HIV/AIDS clinic in Uganda: A mixed methods study. AIDS Care 25(7): 874–880.Google Scholar

Cook, J., Pachler, N., and Bachmair, B. 2011. Ubiquitous mobility with mobile phones: A cultural ecology for mobile learning. E-Learning and Digital Media 8(3): 181–195.Google Scholar

Crompton, H. 2014. A diachronic overview of technology contributing to mobile learning: A shift towards student-centred pedagogies. In Ally, M. and Tsinakos, A., eds. Increasing Access through Mobile Learning: 7–15. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning.Google Scholar

Denk, M., Weber, M., and Belfin, R. 2007. Mobile learning – challenges and potentials. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 1(2): 122–139.Google Scholar

Deriquito, M., and Domingo, Z. 2012. Mobile learning for teachers in Asia. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. http://unesdoc.unesco.org (accessed August 28, 2016).Google Scholar

DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., and Salas, E. 2004. Optimizing e-learning: Research-based guidelines for learner controlled training. Human Resource Management 43(2/3): 147–162.Google Scholar

Eaton, S. C. 2003. If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations. A Journal of Economy and Society 42(2): 145–167.Google Scholar

The Economist. 2015. Planet of the phones. February 28. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21645180-smartphone-ubiquitous-addictive-and-transformative-planet-phones (accessed August 29, 2016).Google Scholar

Fang, B. 2009. From distraction to engagement: Wireless devices in the classroom. Educause Quarterly 32(4): 4–9.Google Scholar

Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., and Smrikarov, A. 2004. M-Learning – a new stage of e-learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech, 1–5.Google Scholar

Ghodsian, D., Bjork, R. A., and Benjamin, A. S. 1997. Evaluating training during training: Obstacles and opportunities. In Quiñones, M. A. and Ehrenstein, A., eds. Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace, 63–88. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Goldstein, I. L., and Ford, J. K. 2002. Training in Organizations, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar

Grawitch, M. J., and Barber, L. K. 2013. In search of the relationship between polychronicity and multitasking performance: The importance of trait self-control. Journal of Individual Differences 34(4): 222–229.Google Scholar

Hall, B. 1997. Web-based Training. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Koole, M. L. 2009. A model for framing mobile learning. In Ally, M., ed., Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, 25–47. Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar

Korucu, T., and Alkan, A. 2011. Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Social and Behavioral Science 15: 1925–1930.Google Scholar

Kotze, T. G., and Du Plessis, P. J. 2003. Students as “co-producers” of education: A proposed model of student socialisation and participation at tertiary institutions. Quality Assurance in Education 11(4): 186–201.Google Scholar

Kraiger, K. 2008. Transforming our models of learning and development: Web-based instruction as enabler of third generation instruction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice 1: 454–467.Google Scholar

Kraiger, K., and Jerden, E. 2007. A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. In Fiore, S. M. and Salas, E., eds., Toward a Science of Distributed Learning, 65–90. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. 2010. Learning cultures on the move: Where are we heading? Educational Technology and Society 13(4): 4–14.Google Scholar

Laouris, Y., and Eteokleous, N., 2005. We need an educationally relevant definition of mobile learning. www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Laouris%20&%20Eteokleous.pdf (accessed April 24, 2017).Google Scholar

Lavoie, J. A. A., and Pychyl, T. A. 2001. Cyberslacking and the procrastination superhighway: A web-based survey of online procrastination, attitudes, and emotion. Social Science Computer Review 19(4): 431–444.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Han, S., and Li, H. 2010. Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems 27(4): 210–226.Google Scholar

Lleras, A., Buetti, S., and Mordkoff, J. T. 2013. When do the effects of distractors provide a measure of distractibility? In Ross, B. H., ed., Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 261–315. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Maddox, T. 2016. BYOD, IoT and wearables thriving in the enterprise. TechProResearch. http://www.techproresearch.com/article/byod-iot-and-wearables-thriving-in-the-enterprise (accessed April 17, 2017).Google Scholar

McCole, D., Culbertson, M. J., Suvedi, M., and McNamara, P. 2014. Addressing the challenges of extension and advisory services in Uganda: The Grameen Foundation’s Community Knowledge Worker Program. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 21(1): 6–18.Google Scholar

Mercado, J. E., and Murphy, J. 2012. Evaluating Mobile Device Usage in the Army. Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Education and Training Modeling and Simulation (ETMS’12). San Diego, CA: The Society for Modeling and Simulation International.Google Scholar

Messier, S., and Schroeder, S. 2014. 6 elements of a successful iPad implementation. https://www.iste.org/explore/articledetail?articleid=219 (accessed August 15, 2016).Google Scholar

mobl21. 2015. Mobile learning basics. http://www.mobl21.com/Basics_Of_Mobile_Learning.pdf (accessed August 20, 2016).Google Scholar

Mostakhdemin-Hosseini, A., and Tuimala, J. 2005. Mobile learning framework. IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2005. Qawra, Malta.Google Scholar

Motiwalla, L. F. 2007. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers and Education 49: 581–596.Google Scholar

Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., and Klein, H. J. 2014. Learning in the twenty-first century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1: 245–275.Google Scholar

Orvis, K. A., Brusso, R. C., Wasserman, M. E., and Fisher, S. L. 2011. E-nabled for e-learning? The moderating role of personality in determining the optimal degree of learner control in an e-learning environment. Human Performance 24: 60–78.Google Scholar

Pandey, A. 2016. 5 killer examples: How to use microlearning-based training effectively. eLearning Industry. April 11. https://elearningindustry.com/5-killer-examples-use-microlearning-based-training-effectively (accessed August 25, 2016).Google Scholar

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., and Bjork, R. 2008. Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9(3): 105–119.Google Scholar

Paul, T. V. 2014. An evaluation of the effectiveness of e-learning, mobile learning, and instructor-led training in organizational training and development. Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning 10(2): 1–13.Google Scholar

Pimmer, C., and Gröhbiel, U. 2008. Mobile learning in corporate settings: Results from an expert survey. Paper presented at the MLearn08 conference.Google Scholar