Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- 4 Schwartz Cultural Values: Implications for Global Work–Family Research
- 5 Relationships between Social Policy, Economic Characteristics, and the Work–Family Interface
- 6 The Impact of Leave Policies on Employment, Fertility, Gender Equality, and Health
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
4 - Schwartz Cultural Values: Implications for Global Work–Family Research
from Part II - Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- 4 Schwartz Cultural Values: Implications for Global Work–Family Research
- 5 Relationships between Social Policy, Economic Characteristics, and the Work–Family Interface
- 6 The Impact of Leave Policies on Employment, Fertility, Gender Equality, and Health
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
The present chapter presents Schwartz´s (2006) theory of cultural values, which identifies seven cultural value orientations (i.e. affective autonomy, intellectual autonomy, embeddedness, egalitarianism, hierarchy, mastery, and harmony) organized in three bipolar cultural dimensions and forming a coherent circular structure. The chapter then contrasts Schwartz´s (2006) cultural value orientations with other cultural dimensions used in the cross-cultural literature. Based on previous work-family research, the chapter encourages work-family scholars to explore the role of cultural value orientations on two important work-family related outcomes, namely work-family conflict and work-family enrichment. Specifically, based on this review, the chapter proposes research questions pertaining to the independent and interactive effects of cultural value orientations on work-family demands, work-family involvement, social support, and, ultimately, work-family enrichment and work-family conflict.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 89 - 102Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bilsky, W., Janik, M.J., & Schwartz, S.H., (2011). The structural organization of human values-evidence from three rounds of the European social survey (ESS). Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 42, (5), 759–776. doi:10.1177/0022022110362757Google Scholar
Butts, M.M. Casper, W.J., & Yang, T.S. (2013). How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, (1), 1–25. doi: 10.1037/a0030389Google Scholar
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, (2), 169–198.Google Scholar
Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work–life ‘balance’ in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49, (4), 379–393. doi: 10.1177/0001699306071680Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, (1) 51–100.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frone, M. R., Russell, M. D., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, (1), 65–78.Google Scholar
Glazer, S. (2006). Social support across cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, (5), 605–622.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, (1), 76–88.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1994). Work–family conflict, social support, and well-being. In Davidson, M. J. & Burke, R. J. (Eds.), Women in management: Current research issues (pp. 213–229). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J.H., & Powell, G.N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, (1), 72–92.Google Scholar
Haar, J.M., Russo, M. Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, (3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: SageGoogle Scholar
House, R. J., Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., & Dofman, P. W. (2004). Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study Of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Bakker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, (1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L.. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51, (2), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossek, E.E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. (2012). Workplace Social Support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289–313. 10.1111/j.1744–6570.2011.01211.xGoogle Scholar
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models (5th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., (2009). Work–family Balance, Gender and Policy (1st ed). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology, 63, 96–129.Google Scholar
Lyness, K.S., & Kropf, M.B. (2005). The relationships of national gender equality and organizational support with work–family balance: A study of European managers. Human Relations, 58, (1), 33–60. doi: 10.1177/0018726705050934.Google Scholar
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review. 41, 921–936.Google Scholar
Masuda, A.D., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., Brough, P., Ferrero, P., Fraile, G., Lu, L., Lu, C., Siu, O., O’Driscoll, M. P., Simoni, A., Shima, S., & Moreno-Velazquez, I. (2012). Flexible working arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison of three country clusters. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, (1), 1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.xGoogle Scholar
Michel, J.S., Kotrba, L.M., Mitchelson, J.K., Clark, M.A., & Baltes, B.B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, (5), 689–725. doi: 10.1002/job.695Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2016). Cross-national work–life research: A review at the individual level. In Allen, T.D. & Eby, L.T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work And Family, Oxford Library of Psychology.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Foucreault, A. (2016). Cross-National Work–life Research: Cultural and Structural Impacts for Individuals and Organizations. Journal of Management, 43, 1–26. doi: 10.1177/0149206316655873Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A., Valcour, M., Den Dulk, L., & Kossek, E.E. (2013). Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 31, (5), 433–447.Google Scholar
Ollo-Lópeza, A., & Goñi-Legaza, S. (2015). Differences in work–family conflict: which individual and national factors explain them? The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 1–26. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1118141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G.N., Francesco, A.M., & Ling, Y. (2009). Toward culture-sensitive theories of the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, (5), 597–616. doi: 10.1002/job.568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, (4), 19–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.xGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (2001). Egalitarianism. In: Lipset, S. (Ed.), Political Philosophy: Theories, Thinkers and Concepts (pp. 64–71). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S.H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, (2), 137–182. doi: 10.1163/156913306778667357Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, (5), 519–542. DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032005001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S.H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, (6), 1010–1028. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010Google Scholar
Siegel, J. I., Licht, A. N., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Egalitarianism and international investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(3), 621–642.Google Scholar
Smith, P.B., Peterson, M.F., & Schwartz, S.H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior: A 47-Nation Study. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 33, (2), 188–208.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E., Allen, T. D., Poelmans, S. A. Y., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., O’Driscoll, M., et al. (2007). Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work–family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 60, (4), 805–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00092.xGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S. A., Allen, T. D., O’Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J. I., et al. (2004). A cross-national comparative study of work–family stressors, working hours, and well-being: China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57, (1), 119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02486.xGoogle Scholar
Vauclair, C. M., & Fischer, R. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes? A cross‐cultural multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 645–657.Google Scholar