Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: November 2020

12 - The Politics of Wonder

from Part I - Historical Antecedents and Philosophical Debates

Summary

Nussbaum’s capabilities approach harks back to ancient Greek phūsis at the origin of the philosophical tradition, but it is a form of environmental humanism developing Enlightenment values. This complexity is not without its tensions. Using the contradictions I find contained in Nussbaum’s commitment to wonder as a universally important ethical experience, I push her extension of moral regard for other species farther than it can currently go. Nussbaum has transformed the Enlightenment concept of dignity to include other forms of life. Her considered position is a form of biocentric individualism. Biocentric individualism is the view that individual lives as such have dignity. However, I will show that her outlook, grounded in wonder, presents insurmountable obstacles to her biocentric individualism. I resolve these by suggesting that moral individualism ought to be jettisoned when species are not morally individualized in their form of life. I motivate this argument through the risk of a mass extinction cascade, which characterizes our planetary ecological situation and poses a threat both to human development and the moral and ethical commitments of the capabilities approach. I propose one general criterion for reasonable institutions regarding this risk, surrounding it with a call for environmental humanism in political culture.

Bendik-Keymer, J. 2006. The Ecological Life: Discovering Citizenship and a Sense of Humanity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bendik-Keymer, J. 2013. ‘The Moral and the Ethical: What Conscience Teaches Us about Morality’, in Gluchmann, V (ed.). Morality: Reasoning on Different Approaches. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 1123.
Bendik-Keymer, J. 2014a. ‘From Humans to All of Life: Nussbaum’s Transformation of Dignity’, in Comim, F and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.). Capabilities, Gender, Equality: Toward Fundamental Entitlements. New York: Cambridge University Press: 175192.
Bendik-Keymer, J. 2014b. ‘Living Up to Our Own Humanity: The Elevated Extinction Rate and What It Says about Us’. Ethics, Policy and Environment 17/3: 339354.
Bendik-Keymer, J. 2016. ‘“Goodness Itself Must Change” – Anthroponomy in an Age of Socially Caused, Planetary Environmental Change’. Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 6/3–4: 187202.
Bendik-Keymer, J. 2017. ‘The Reasonableness of Wonder’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18/3: 337355.
Bendik-Keymer, J. and Haufe, C. 2017. ‘Anthropogenic Mass Extinction: The Science, the Ethics, and the Civics’, in Gardiner, S and Thompson, A (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press: 427437.
Bostrom, N. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Darwall, S. 2006. The Second Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fineberg, J. 1997. The Innocent Eye. Princeton University Press.
Flanders, C. 2014. ‘Public Reason and Animal Rights’, in Wissenberg and Schlosberg 2014: 4457.
Foot, P. 2000. Natural Goodness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Geach, P. 1977. The Virtues: The Stanton Lectures, 1973–74. Cambridge University Press.
Görke, M. 2003. The Death of Our Planet’s Species: A Challenge to Ecology and Ethics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Grandin, T. and Johnson, C. 2009. Animals Make Us Human: Creating the Best Life for Animals. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Heidegger, M. 1975. Early Greek Thinking. Trans. D. F. Krell and F. A. Capuzzi. New York: Harper & Row.
Holland, B. 2012. ‘The Environment as Meta-Capability: Why a Dignified Human Life Requires a Stable Climate System’, in Thompson and Bendik-Keymer 2012: 145164.
Keulartz, J. 2017. ‘Toward an Animal Ethics for the Anthropocene’, in Bovenkerk, B and Keulartz, J (eds.). Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans. New York: Springer: 243264.
Keulartz, J. and Swart, J. A. A. 2012. ‘Animal Flourishing and Capabilities in an Era of Global Change’, in Thompson and Bendik-Keymer 2012: 123144.
Larmore, C. 1996. The Morals of Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Larmore, C. 2010. The Practices of the Self. University of Chicago Press.
Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Linch, A. 2015. ‘A Dignity of One’s Own: Nussbaum’s Biocentrism and the Politics of Wonder’. Human Development and Capability Association annual meeting. Georgetown University, 12 September.
McKean, E. (ed.). 2005. New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd ed., online version. Oxford University Press: ‘wonder’.
Nussbaum, M. C. 1978. Aristotle’s De Moto Animalium. Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2006a. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2006b. ‘Human Dignity and Political Entitlements’, in Schulman, A (ed.). Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics: ch. 14.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2017. ‘Human Capabilities and Animal Lives: Conflict, Wonder, Law’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18/3: 317321.
Nussbaum, M. C. and Wichert, R. 2019. ‘The Legal Status of Whales and Dolphins: From Bentham to the Capabilities Approach’, in Keleher, L and Kosko, S. J. (eds.). Agency and Democracy in Development Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press: 259288.
Palmer, C. 2010. Animal Ethics in Context. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rolston, H. 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schlosberg, D. 2012. ‘Justice, Ecological Integrity, and Climate Change’, in Thompson and Bendik-Keymer 2012: 165184.
Schlosberg, D. 2014. ‘Ecological Justice for the Anthropocene’, in Wissenberg and Schlosberg 2014: 7589.
Tarkovsky, A. 1975. Mirror. Moscow: Mosfilms.
Thompson, A. and Bendik-Keymer, J. (eds.). 2012. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thompson, M. 2004. ‘What Is it to Wrong Somebody? A Puzzle about Justice’, in Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P, Schleffler, S and Smith, M (eds.). Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. New York: Oxford University Press: 333384.
Wissenberg, M. 2014. ‘An Agenda for Animal Political Theory’, in Wissenberg and Schlosberg 2014: 3043.
Wissenberg, M. and Schlosberg, D. (eds.). 2014. Animal Politics and Political Animals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.