Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). What is privacy worth? The Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aiello, J. R. (1993). Computer based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 499–507. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1993.tb01100.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aiello, J. R. & Douthitt, E. A. (2001). Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(3), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aiello, J. R. & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(3), 339–353. doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.80.3.339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aiello, J. R. & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 537–548. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1993.tb01102.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajunwa, I. (Jan 19, 2017). Workplace wellness programs could be putting your health data at risk. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/01/workplace-wellness-programs-could-be-putting-your-health-data-at-risk.Google Scholar

Ajunwa, I., Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2017). Limitless worker surveillance. California Law Review, 105, 735–776.Google Scholar

Alder, G. S. (2007). Examining the relationship between feedback and performance in a monitored environment: A clarification and extension of feedback intervention theory. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(2), 157–174. doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2006.11.004.Google Scholar

Alder, G. S., Noel, T. W., & Ambrose, M. L. (2006). Clarifying the effects of Internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust. Information & Management, 43(7), 894–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alge, B. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., & Green, S. G. (2004). Remote control: Predictors of electronic monitoring intensity and secrecy. Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrose, M. L. & Kulik, C. T. (1994). The effect of information format and performance pattern on performance appraisal judgments in a computerized performance monitoring context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 801–823. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1994.tb00613.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Management Association. (2007). Electronic monitoring and surveillance survey. AMA/ePolicy Institute Research. Retrieved from www.amanet.org/training/articles/the-latest-on-workplace-monitoring-and-surveillance.aspx.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. (Writer) & Welsh, B. (Director). (Dec 18, 2011). The entire history of you [Television series episode]. In C. Brooker & A. Jones (Producer), Black mirror. London: Endemol UK.Google Scholar

Astor, M. (July 25, 2017). Microchip implants for employees? One company says yes. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/07/25/technology/microchips-wisconsin-company-employees.html?mcubz=3.Google Scholar

Athey, S., Catalini, C., & Tucker, C. (2017). The digital privacy paradox: Small money, small costs, small talk (No. w23488). National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History, 51(1), 87–106. doi.org/10.1080/00236561003654776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). doi:dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.Google Scholar

Bartels, L. K. & Nordstrom, C. R. (2012). Examining big brother’s purpose for using electronic performance monitoring. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 25(2), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BBC (July 14, 2015). The very French history of the word “surveillance”. BBC News. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-33464368.Google Scholar

Becker, T. E. & Marique, G. (2014). Observer effects without demand characteristics: An inductive investigation of video monitoring and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrend, T. S., Yost, A. B., Howardson, G. N., Badger Darrow, J., & Jenson, J. (2018). Reactance to organizational surveillance: A test of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology.Google Scholar

Bhave, D. P. (2014). The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 605–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, R. (Feb 11, 2014). Is new truck-monitoring technology for safety – or spying on drivers? Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/robertbowman/2014/02/11/is-new-truck-monitoring-technology-for-safety-or-spying-on-drivers.Google Scholar

Boyd, K. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, N. (1995). The effects of monitoring individual and group performance on the distribution of effort across tasks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 760–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. R., Badger, J. M., Behrend, T. S., & Jensen, J. M. (April, 2012). Personality predicts acceptance of performance monitoring at work. Paper presented to the 27^th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Cascio, W. F. & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015–062352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalykoff, J. & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 807–834. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744–6570.1989.tb00676.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, S. (Sept 5, 2017). European court limits employers’ right to monitor workers’ email. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2017/09/05/business/european-court-employers-workers-email.html.Google Scholar

Chorley, M. J., Whitaker, R. M., & Allen, S. M. (2015). Personality and location-based social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, A. H. & Oliver, D. H. (2006). The importance of taking action, not just sharing survey feedback. In Kraut, A. I. (Eds.), Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications (pp. 102–130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Davidson, R. & Henderson, R. (2000). Electronic performance monitoring: A laboratory investigation of the influence of monitoring and difficulty on task performance, mood state, and self-reported stress levels. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(5), 906–920. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.2000.tb02502.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Montjoye, Y. A., Quoidbach, J., Robic, F., & Pentland, A. S. (April, 2013). Predicting personality using novel mobile phone-based metrics. In Greenberg, A.M., Kennedy, W.G., & Bos, N.D. (Eds.), International conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling, and prediction (pp. 48–55). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Determann, L., & Sprague, R. (2011). Intrusive monitoring: Employee privacy expectations are reasonable in Europe, destroyed in the United States. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 26(2), 979–1036.Google Scholar

Drexel University (2016). Just give me some privacy – Anonymous Wikipedia editors and Tor users explain why they don’t want you to know who they are. DrexelNow. Retrieved from http://drexel.edu/now/archive/2016/October/Tor-Wikipedia-privacy/.Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(1), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied psychology, 66(2), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fessler, L. (Sept 7, 2017). At the world’s largest hedge fund, 24-year-olds use “dots” to critique their CEO. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1071749/bridgewater-associates-ceo-ray-dalio-explains-the-dot-collector-feedback-tool-his-company-uses-to-rate-employees/.Google Scholar

Gardella, A. (June 5, 2015). Employer sued for GPS-tracking salesperson 24/7. Forbes. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/adrianagardella/2015/06/05/employer-sued-for-gps-tracking-salesperson-247/#55fe267823e3.Google Scholar

Grant, R. A. & Higgins, C. A. (1991). The impact of computerized performance monitoring on service work: Testing a causal model. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 116–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, R. A., Higgins, C. A., & Irving, R. H. (1988). Computerized performance monitors: Are they costing you customers? Sloan Management Review, 29(3), 39–45.Google Scholar

Griffith, T. L. (1993). Monitoring and performance: A comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 549–572. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1993.tb01103.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, R. & Acquisti, A. (2005, November). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, 71–80. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstede, G., 1997. Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Holley, P. (Jan 15, 2018). Big Brother on wheels: Why your car company may know more about you than your spouse. The Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2018/01/15/big-brother-on-wheels-why-your-car-company-may-know-more-about-you-than-your-spouse/?utm_term=.b584b0e4638f.Google Scholar

Hovorka-Mead, , Ross, A. Whipple, D., Brenchin, W. H., T., & Michella, B. (2002). Watching the detectives: Seasonal student employee reactions to electronic monitoring with and without advance notification. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 329–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, J. M. & Raver, J. L. (2012). When self-management and surveillance collide: Consequences for employees’ organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 37(3), 308–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeske, D. & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Monitoring what and how: Psychological implications of electronic performance monitoring. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanfer, R. & Chen, G. (2016). Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karim, M. N. (2015). Electronic monitoring and self-regulation: Effects of monitoring purpose on goal state, feedback perceptions, and learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (3687652)Google Scholar

Kidwell, R. E. & Bennett, N. (1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness. Group & Organization Management, 19(2), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, K. J., & Aiello, J. R. (1996). The effects of electronic performance monitoring on stress: Locus of control as a moderator variable. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(3), 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulik, C. T. & Ambrose, M. L. (1993). Category-based and feature-based processes in performance appraisal: Integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 821–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landy, F. J. & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 72–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lankshear, G. & Mason, D. (2001). Technology and ethical dilemmas in a medical setting: Privacy, professional autonomy, life and death. Ethics and Information Technology, 3(3), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, J. R. & Callahan, C. (1990). Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 530–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lohr, S. (April 20, 2013). Big data, trying to build better workers. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/technology/big-data-tryingto-build-better-workers.html.Google Scholar

Lohr, S. (June 21, 2014). Unblinking eyes track employees. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/06/22/technology/workplace-surveillance-sees-good-and-bad.html?mcubz=3.Google Scholar

McNall, L. A. & Roch, S. G. (2007). Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 658–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNall, L. A. & Roch, S. G. (2009). A social exchange model of employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring. Human Performance, 22(3), 204–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minton-Eversole, T. (July 19, 2012). Virtual teams used most by global organizations, survey says. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/organizational-and-employee-development/pages/virtualteamsusedmostbyglobalorganizations,surveysays.aspx.Google Scholar

Moorman, R. H. & Wells, D. L. (2003). Can electronic performance monitoring be fair? Exploring relationships among monitoring characteristics, perceived fairness, and job performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(2), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, S., Griffin, D., & Gower, P. (Aug 18, 2017). Barclays puts in sensors to see which bankers are at their desks. Bloomberg. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017–08-18/barclays-puts-in-sensors-to-see-which-bankers-are-at-their-desks.Google Scholar

Motowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4), 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nebeker, D. M. & Tatum, B. C. (1993). The effects of computer monitoring, standards, and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction, and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 508–536. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.1993.tb01101.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (1994). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panina, D. & Aiello, J. R. (2005). Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: A conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 11, 269–292. doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2005.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posey, C., Bennett, B., Roberts, T., & Lowry, P. B. (2011). When computer monitoring backfires: Invasion of privacy and organizational injustice as precursors to computer abuse. Journal of Information System Security, 7(1), 24–47.Google Scholar

Ribitzky, R. (2007). Active monitoring of employees rises to 78%. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=88319&page=1.Google Scholar

Roberts, D. (Aug 3, 2016). 1.8 million American truck drivers could lose their jobs to robots. What then? Vox. Retrieved from www.vox.com/2016/8/3/12342764/autonomous-trucks-employment.Google Scholar

Schleifer, L. M., Galinsky, T. L., & Pan, C. S. (1996). Mood disturbances and musculoskeletal discomfort: Effects of electronic performance monitoring under different levels of VDT data entry performance. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 8(4), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schoeman, F. (1984). Privacy: Philosophical dimensions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(3), 199–213.Google Scholar

Sewell, G. & Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shockley, K. (2014). Telecommuting. Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology White Paper Series. Bowling Green, OH: Scientific Affairs Committee of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology.Google Scholar

Smith, M. J., Conway, F. T., & Karsh, B. T. (1999). Occupational stress in human computer interaction. Industrial Health, 37(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stanton, J. M. (2000a). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance, 13(1), 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanton, J. M. (2000b). Traditional and electronic monitoring from an organizational justice perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanton, J. M. & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanton, J. M. & Julian, A. L. (2002). The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanton, J. M. & Stam, K. R. (2006). The visible employee: Using workplace monitoring and surveillance to protect information assets–without compromising employee privacy or trust. Medford, NJ: Information Today.Google Scholar

Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., & McClure, S. (1983). A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Surveillance. (n.d). In Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from www.etymonline.com/word/surveillance.Google Scholar

Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, L. F., Meriac, J. P., & Cope, J. G. (2002). Motivating online performance: The influences of goal setting and Internet self-efficacy. Social Science Computer Review, 20(2), 149–160. doi.org/10.1177/089443930202000205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, L. F., Sebastianelli, J. D., & Murray, N. P. (2009). Monitoring online training behaviors: Awareness of electronic surveillance hinders e-learners. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(9), 2191–2212. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559–1816.2009.00521.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M. K., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R. W., & Fromkin, H. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 308–313. doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.66.3.308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomczak, D. L., Lanzo, L. A., & Aguinis, H. (2018). Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring. Business Horizons, 61(2), 251–259. doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vorvoreanu, M. & Botan, C. H. (June, 2000). Examining electronic surveillance in the workplace: A review of theoretical perspectives and research findings. In the Conference of the International Communication Association.Google Scholar

Watson, A. M., Thompson, L. F., Rudolph, J. V., Whelan, T. J., Behrend, T. S., & Gissel, A. L. (2013). When big brother is watching: Goal orientation shapes reactions to electronic monitoring during online training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 642–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wells, D. L., Moorman, R. H., & Werner, J. M. (2007). The impact of the perceived purpose of electronic performance monitoring on an array of attitudinal variables. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, J. P. & Bowman, J. S. (2016). Electronic surveillance at work: An ethical analysis. Administration & Society, 48(5), 628–651. doi.org/10.1177/0095399714556502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westin, A. F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431–453. doi.org/10.1111/1540–4560.00072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willford, J. C., Cox, M. J., Howard, R., & Behrend, T. S. (May, 2015a). Workplace monitoring and surveillance: A mixed-methods examination of invasiveness perceptions. Poster presented at the 27th Annual Convention for the Association for Psychological Science, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Willford, J. C., Cox, M. J., Howard, R., Badger, J. M., & Behrend, T. S. (April, 2015b). A latent class analysis of electronic monitoring practices. Poster presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Willford, J. C., Tomczak, D. L., Jimenez, W. P., Ravid, D., & Behrend, T. S. (April, 2017). Electronic performance monitoring type predicts monitoring perceptions and contextual performance. Poster presented at the 32^nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar

Yost, A. B., Behrend, T. S., Howardson, G. N., Badger Darrow, J., & Jenson, J. (2018). Reactance to organizational surveillance: A test of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology. doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9532-2.Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zakrzewski, C. (March 13, 2016). The key to getting workers to stop wasting time online. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/the-key-to-getting-workers-to-stop-wasting-time-online-1457921545.Google Scholar

Zarya, V. (Feb 17, 2016). Employers are quietly using big data to track employee pregnancies. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/02/17/castlight-pregnancy-data/.Google Scholar

Zweig, D. & Scott, K. (2007). When unfairness matters most: Supervisory violations of electronic monitoring practices. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(3), 227–247. doi.org/10.1111/j.1748–8583.2007.00040.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zweig, D. & Webster, J. (2002). Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 605–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar