Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:07:35.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Worksite interventions

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Paul A. Estabrooks
Affiliation:
Kaiser Permanente-Colorado
Russell E. Glasgow
Affiliation:
Kaiser Permanente-Colorado
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Overview

There are numerous theoretical and practical reasons for delivering health promotion programmes in work places. First, the worksite is an environment in which many adults spend a large percentage of their waking hours. Secondly, interventions conducted in a person's relevant physical and social environment – rather than in clinical settings that are not frequented by most individuals – have fewer problems with generalization. Thirdly, worksites offer the opportunity to combine policy, organizational and individual behaviour change strategies: conceptually the combination of such strategies should be more powerful than any one in isolation (Glasgow et al., 1990; Sorensen et al., 2000). Fourthly, the common and consistent interactions among employees within worksites offers the potential for various social support intervention components such as group rewards, participatory employee steering committees, co-worker support and incentive programmes. Fifthly, worksite programmes can increase the reach of health promotion by getting many persons to take advantage of health promotion offerings who may not otherwise participate (Glasgow et al., 1993). Finally, there are also good reasons for employers to offer such programmes. Worksite interventions can potentially increase employee recruitment and retention, reduce health care costs and absenteeism and enhance employee morale and productivity (Pelletier, 2001; Riedel et al., 2001).

There are also complexities and potential downsides to worksite interventions. Some employees may feel that such programmes are coercive, especially in cases in which there are workplace exposures or safety hazards that are not concurrently addressed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baranowski, T., Anderson, C. & Carmack, C. (1998). Mediating variable framework in physical activity intervention: How are we doing? How might we do better?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 266–97.Google Scholar
Baranowski, T., Davis, M., Resnicow, K.et al. (2000). Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, S. S., Gillette, C., Glasgow, R. E. & Estabrooks, P. (2003). Worksite health promotion research: to what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?Health Education and Behavior, 30, 537–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. K., Tessaro, I., DeVellis, B.et al. (2002). Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: Health Works for Women. Preventive Medicine, 34, 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, S. A., Story, M. & Jeffery, R. W. (2001). Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annual Review of Public, 22, 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanz, K. (1997). Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: dietary change. Preventive Medicine, 26, S43–S55.Google Scholar
Glasgow, R. E., Hollis, J. F., Ary, D. V. & Lando, H. A. (1990). Employee and organizational factors associated with participation in an incentive-based worksite smoking cessation program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, R. E., McCaul, K. D. & Fisher, K. J. (1993). Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Health Education Quarterly, 20, 291–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M. & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B. & Wenstein, M. C. (2003). Cost effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harvey-Berino, J., Pintauro, S., Buzzell, P. & Gold, E. C. (2004). Effect of Internet support on the long-term maintenance of weight loss. Obesity Research, 12, 320–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennrikus, D. & Jeffery, R. W. (1996). Worksite intervention for weight control: a review of the literature. The Science of Health Promotion, 10, 471–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennrikus, D., Jeffery, R. W., Lando, H.et al. (2002). The SUCCESS Project: the effect of program format and incentives on participation and cessation in worksite smoking cessation programs. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 274–9.Google Scholar
Hunt, M. K., Lederman, R., Potter, S., Stoddard, A. & Sorensen, G. (2000). Results of employee involvement in planning and implementing the Treatwell 5-a-day work-site study. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 223–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, R. W., Thorson, C., Wing, R. R. & Burton, L. R. (1998). Use of personal trainers and financial incentives to increase exercise in a behavioral weight-loss program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 777–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, R. W. & Wing, R. R. (1995). Long-term effects of interventions for weight loss using food provision and monetary incentives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 793–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesges, R. C., Vasey, M. M. & Glasgow, R. E. (1986). A worksite smoking modification competition: potential for public health impact. American Journal of Public Health, 76, 198–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnik, A. & Rasmussen, N. K. (2002). Reducing social inequalities in health: evidence, policy, and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30(Suppl. 59), 1–5.Google Scholar
Kristal, A. R., Glanz, K., Tilley, B. C. & Li, S. (2000). Mediating factors in dietary change: understanding the impact of a worksite nutrition intervention. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 112–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnan, L. A., Emmons, K. & Abrams, D. B. (2002a). Beauty and the Beast: results of the Rhode Island Smokefree Shop Initiative. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 27–8.Google Scholar
Linnan, L. A., Emmons, K. M., Klar, N.et al. (2002b). Challenges to improving the impact of worksite cancer prevention programs: comparing reach, enrollment, and attrition using active versus passive recruitment strategies. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 157–66.Google Scholar
Linnan, L. A. & Marcus, B. (2001). Worksite-based physical activity programs and older adults: current status and priorities for the future. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 9, S59–S70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, B. H., Emmons, K. M., Simkin-Silverman, L. R.et al. (1998). Evaluation of a motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help physical activity interventions at the workplace. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 246–53.Google Scholar
McTigue, K. M., Harris, R., Hemphill, B., Lux, L. & Sutton, S. (2003). Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U. S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 933–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. F., Stroup, D. F. & Gerdes, D. A. (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Journal of American Medical Association, 291, 1238–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R. E., Kristal, A. R., Glanz, K.et al. (1997). Components of the Working Well trial intervention associated with adoption of healthful diets. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13, 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, K. R. (2001). A review and analysis of the clinical- and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: 1998–2000 update. The Science of Health Promotion, 16, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, J. E., Lynch, W., Baase, C., Hymel, P.&Peterson, K. W. (2001). The effect of disease prevention and health promotion on workplace productivity: a literature review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 15, 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, G., Barbeau, E., Hunt, M. K. & Emmons, K. (2004). Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a social–contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 230–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A., LaMontagne, A. D.et al. (2000). A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trial (United States). Journal of Public Health Policy, 24, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A., Ockene, J. K., Hunt, M. K. & Youngstrom, R. (1996a). Worker participation in an integrated health promotion/health protection program: results from the WellWorks project. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 191–203.Google Scholar
Sorensen, G., Thompson, B., Glanz, K.et al. (1996b). Work site-based cancer prevention: primary results from the Working Well Trial. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 939–47.Google Scholar
Tate, D. F., Wing, R. R. & Winett, R. A. (2001). Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 1172–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×