Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:31:27.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Navigating Methodological Trade-Offs in Close Relationships Research

from Part I - Foundations for Studying Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

By
Debra Mashek ,
Minda Oriña  and
William Ickes
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti  and
Daniel Perlman
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

This chapter highlights the richness and diversity of relational experiences in middle and old age. Contrary to traditional stereotypes emphasizing functional decline in the years beyond youth, most adults in the second half of life experience vibrant and meaningful relationships with kin and friends. We begin with a brief history of research on adult close relationships and proceed to a summary of key developmental milestones in middle and late adulthood that have implications for close relationships. Next, we address structural features of relationship networks as well as dynamic interaction processes. Influences on close relationships in adulthood and their effects on individuals are covered after that. The last section provides a summary of recent theoretical and methodological advances in the study of close relationships. This tour of the literature provides a compendium of recent research for reference by those interested in adult development and aging. In addition, it serves as a cue for those studying earlier life relationships whose theories, methods, and results might be enhanced by taking a long-range perspective on social and personal interactions over the entire life course.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 39 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, L. A., Pietromonaco, P. R., DeBuse, C. J., Powers, S. I., & Sayer, A. G. (2013). Spouses’ attachment pairings predict neuroendocrine, behavioral, and psychological responses to marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 388–424. doi: 10.1037/a0033056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Trueman, M., & Stiller, J. (2012). Examining the components of children’s peer liking as antecedents of school adjustment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 303–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borelli, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Randall, A. K., Snavely, J. E., St. John, H. K., & Ruiz, S. K. (2013). Linguistic indicators of wives’ attachment security and communal orientation during military deployment. Family Process, 52, 535–554. doi: 10.1111/famp.12031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borelli, J. L., West, J. L., Weekes, N. Y., & Crowley, M. J. (2014). Dismissing child attachment and discordance for subjective and neuroendocrine responses to vulnerability. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 584–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, V. R. A. (1990). Respondent cooperation and requests for contacts in longitudinal research: A national survey of families and households (NSF Working Paper No. 35). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology. Retrieved from www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/nsfhwp/nsfh35.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R., & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent–child, friendship, and romantic relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, A., & Bem, D. J. (1990). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In Pervin, L. A. (ed.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 549–575). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. (1985). Implications of relationship type for understanding compatibility. In Ickes, W. (ed.) Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 119–140). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. L., & Sheldon, M. S. (2002). Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: Substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality, 70, 783–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, T. B., Birch, P. J., Carroll, J. S., Doxey, C., Larson, J. H., & Linford, S. T. (2001). Premarital prediction of marital quality or breakup: Research, theory, and practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., & Larson, J. H. (1989). PREParation for marriage [questionnaire]. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (1983). A basic paradigm for the study of unstructured dyadic interaction. In Reis, H. T. (ed.) New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (pp. 5–21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (1994). Methods of studying close relationships. In Weber, A. L. & Harvey, J. H. (eds.) Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 18–44). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (2002). Subjective and intersubjective paradigms for the study of social cognition. The New Review of Social Psychology, 1, 112–121.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., & Stinson, L. (1990). Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. In Hendrick, C. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 16–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., & Tooke, W. (1988). The observational method: Studying the interaction of minds and bodies. In Duck, S. W., Hay, E. D., Hobfoll, S. E., Ickes, W., & Montgomery, B. M. (eds.) Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 79–97). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karraker, A., & Latham, K. (2015). In sickness and in health? Physical illness as a risk factor for marital dissolution later in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56, 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8788–8790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2014). Implicit interpersonal attraction in small groups automatically activated evaluations predict actual behavior toward social partners. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5, 671–679. doi: 10.1177/1948550613517723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 1171–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, M. R. (2004). Introduction to behavioral research methods (4th edn.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13, 254–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, M. R., & Robbins, M. L. (2012). Naturalistic observation sampling: The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR). In Mehl, M. R. & Conner, T. S. (eds.) Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 176–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., … & Contestabile, M. (2015). Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science (New York, NY), 348(6242), 1422–1425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oboler, A., Welsh, K., & Cruz, L. (2012). The danger of big data: Social media as computational social science. First Monday, 17(7). doi: 10.5210/fm.v17i7.3993Google Scholar
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. (eds.) Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Arriaga, X. B. (1997). Interdependence theory. In Duck, S. (ed.) Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd edn., pp. 221–250). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Russell, M. A. (2014). Mining the social web: Data mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, GitHub, and more (2nd edn.), Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2015). Research methods in psychology (10th edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×