Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 5
  • Print publication year: 2019
  • Online publication date: February 2019

13 - Multiple Points of Access for Supporting Interest in Science

from Part III - Interest and Internal Motivation

Summary

The pipeline metaphor used to characterize dwindling interest in science and STEM-related careers has gradually been replaced by alternative models that convey complex pathways into, through and out of science by young men and women. In this chapter, we review literatures from educational psychology, cognitive development, and science education and present our own mixed methods approach to developing a model of the roles that children, parents and teachers play in launching, supporting, and sustaining pathways to science interest from early childhood to the transition to college. We use our longitudinal data to describe cases that illustrate these critical developmental inflection points. These rich cases illustrate the advantages of using qualitative methods, when possible, to augment developmental models derived from more quantitative approaches depicted through path diagrams, phase models, or Sankey diagrams. The cases discussed highlight critical roles that parents and teachers might play in nurturing science interests among males and females. Implications for future research and suggestions for practice are considered.

Development, in fact, may be viewed best as a set of multiple developmental trajectories, and our task as developmentalists is to discover how the interplay between different trajectories of children and adults accounts for outcomes.

(Parke et al., 1994, p. 47)
Afterschool Alliance. (2017). STEM-ready America: Inspiring and preparing students for success with afterschool and summer learning. Washington, DC. Stemreadyamerica.org. Available at http://stemreadyamerica.org/read-the-compendium/.
Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96, 763–86. doi: 10.1002/sce.21018.
Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Leibham, M. E. (2015). Emerging individual interests related to science in young children. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 261–80). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Alexander, K. L., Entwiscle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72, 167–80. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200201.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children's engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 881908. doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). “Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous”: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 21, 171–94. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.748676.
Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 564–82. doi: 10.1002/tea.20353.
Azevedo, F. S. (2015). Sustaining interest-based participation in science. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 281–96). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Basu, S. J. & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 466–89. doi: 10.1002/tea.20143.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi: 10.17226/12190.
Bergstrom, Z., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2016). Evolution and persistence of students’ astronomy career interests: A gender study. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3, 7792. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v3i1.9690.
Bulunuz, M. & Jarrett, O. S. (2015). Play as an aspect of interest development in science. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 153–72). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98, 443–60. doi: 10.1002/sce.21108.
Chak, A. (2010). Adult response to children's exploratory behaviours: An exploratory study. Early Child Development and Care, 180, 633–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430802181965.
Chi, M. T. H. & Koeske, R. D. (1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 2939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.1.29.
Clausen, J. A. (1986). The life course: A sociological perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education. 27, 471–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323746.
Committee on Equal Opportunity in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) (2015). 2013–2014 Biennial report to congress: Broadening participation in today's STEM workforce. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/documents/2013-2014 CEOSE Biennial Report to Congress_Final Version_09-08-2015.pdf.
Correll, S. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.
Crowley, K., Barron, B., Knutson, K., & Martin, C. K. (2015). Interest and the development of pathways to science. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 297314). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97, 395409. doi: 10.1002/sce.21060.
DeLoache, J. S., Simcock, G., & Macari, S. (2007). Planes, trains, automobiles – and tea sets: Extremely intense interests in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1579–86. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1579.
Dickhauser, O. & Steinsmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Gender differences in the choice of computer science courses: Applying an expectancy-value model. Social Psychology of Education, 6, 173–89. doi: 10.1023%2FA%3A1024735227657.pdf.
Downey, D. B., Von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900501.
Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., & Epstein, A. (2015). Understanding well-developed interests and activity commitment. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 315–30). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–95). New York, NY; Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470147658.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (2001). The no child left behind act of 2001. Accessed from www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.
Engel, S. (2011). Children's need to know: Curiosity in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 625645. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.h054131316473115.
Engel, S. (2015). The hungry mind: The origins of curiosity in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Falk, J. H. & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 431–52. doi: 10.1002/tea.21080.
Falk, J. H., Staus, N., Dierking, L. D., Penuel, W., Wyld, J., & Bailey, D. (2016). Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 369–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080.21548455.2015.1093670.
Fredricks, J. A. & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Parental influences on youth involvement in sports. In Weiss, M. (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 145–64). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Gallagher, K. C. (2002). Does child temperament moderate the influence of parenting on adjustment? Developmental Review, 22, 623–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00503-8.
George, R. & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS:88. Science Education, 82, 93109. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<93:: AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-W.
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures, and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 535–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690116971.
Gobbo, C., & Chi, M. T. H. (1986). How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children. Cognitive Development, 1, 221–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80002-8.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3.
Gottfried, A. E., Preston, K. S., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P. H., Delany, D. E., & Ibhrahim, S. M. (2016). Pathways from parental stimulation of children's curiosity to high school science course accomplishments and science career interest and skill. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1972–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220690.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliott, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals in college: Predicting continued interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316.
Hidi, S. & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness – A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179–94. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1002_3.
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Nieswandt, M. (2015). Conclusions: Emerging issues and themes in addressing interest in learning mathematics and science. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 385–96). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Hoffman, L. L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X.
Holden, G. W. (2010). Childrearing and developmental trajectories: Positive pathways, off-ramps, and dynamic processes. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 197204. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00148.x.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2015). Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model Replication Institutions Program. Washington, DC. Available at www.ihep.org/sites/default/files/uploads/docs/pubs/report_diversifying_the_stem_pipeline_report.pdf.
Jodl, K. M., Michael, A., Malanchuk, O., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2001). Parents’ roles in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development, 72, 1247–65. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00345.
Johnson, K. E., Alexander, J. M., Spencer, S., Leibham, M. E., & Neitzel, C. (2004). Factors associated with the early emergence of intense interests within conceptual domains. Cognitive Development, 19, 325–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.03.001.
Kerckhoff, A. C. (1993). Diverging pathways: Social structure and career deflections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Klahr, D., Matlen, B., & Jirout, J. (2013). Children as scientific thinkers. In Feist, G. J. & Gorman, M. E. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science (pp. 243–7). New York, NY: Springer.
Knapp, D. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of an out of school science experience. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 4451. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17767.x.
Krapp, A. & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645.
Lee, J. D. (1998). Which kids can “become” scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 199219. www.jstor.org/stable/2787108.
Leibham, M. E., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations to later self-concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97, 574–93. doi: 10.1002/sce.21066.
Leibham, M. E., Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., Neitzel, C. L., & Reis-Henrie, F. P. (2005). Parenting behaviors associated with the maintenance of preschoolers’ interests: A prospective longitudinal study. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 397414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.05.001.
Lin, P.-Y. & Schunn, C. D. (2016). The dimension and impact of informal science learning experiences on middle schoolers’ attitudes and abilities in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 2551–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1251631.
Lipstein, R. L. & Renninger, K. (2007). Interest for writing: How teachers can make a difference. English Journal, 96(4), 7985. www.jstor.org/stable/30047170.
Lyon, G. H., Jafri, J., & St. Louis, K. (2012, Fall). Beyond the pipeline: STEM pathways for youth development. Afterschool Matters, 4857. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992152.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339621.
Maltese, A. V. & Harsh, J. A. (2015). Students’ pathways of entry into STEM. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 203–24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Maltese, A. V. & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 669–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385.
Maltese, A. & Tai, R. S. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877907. doi: 10.1002/sce.20441.
McAdams, D. P. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
McCreedy, D. & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Cascading influences: Long-term impacts of informal STEM experiences for girls. Philadelphia, PA. The Franklin Institute Science Museum. Available at www.fi.edu/sites/default/files/cascading-influences.pdf.
McDevitt, M. & Ostrowski, A. (2009). The adolescent unbound: Unintentional influence of curricula in ideological conflict seeking. Political Communication, 26, 1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600802622811.
Mervis, C. B., Pani, J. R., & Pani, A. M. (2003). Transaction of child cognitive-linguistic abilities and adult input in the acquisition of lexical categories at the basic and subordinate levels. In Rakison, D. H. & Oakes, L. M. (Eds.), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 242–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Metcalf, H. (2014). Disrupting the pipeline: Critical analyses of student pathways through postsecondary STEM education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 158, 7793. doi: 10.1002/ir.20047.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424.
National Science Foundation. (2011). Science and engineering degrees: 1966–2008 NSF 11–316. Arlington, VA: NSF. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf11316/pdf/nsf11316.pdf.
Neitzel, C., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2008). Children's early interest-based activities in the home and subsequent information contributions and pursuits in kindergarten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 782–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.782.
OECD (2007). Education at a glance 2007: OECD indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available at www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/40701218.pdf.
Osborne, J. F. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation. Available at www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199.
Parke, R. D., Ornstein, P. A., Rieser, J. J., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (1994). The past as prologue: An overview of a century of developmental psychology. In Parke, R. D., Ornstein, P. A., Reiser, J. J., & Waxler, C. Z. (Eds.), A century of developmental psychology (pp. 170). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment). (2006). Paris: OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).
Potvin, P. & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K–12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50, 85129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf.
Pressick-Kilborn, K. (2015). Canalization and connectedness in the development of science interest. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 353–68). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Renninger, K. A. (1989). Individual differences in children's play interest. In Winegar, L. T. (Ed.), Social interaction and the development of children's understanding (pp. 147–72). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A. (2009). Interest and identity development in instruction: An inductive model. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832392.
Renninger, K. A. & Riley, K. (2013). Interest, cognition, and the case of L- and science. In Kreitler, S. (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 352–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renninger, K. A. & Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 624–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.4.624.
Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2010). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–76. doi: 10.1002/sce.20431.
Rosser, S. V. & Lane, E. O. (2002). Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain female scientists and engineers: Family-unfriendly policies, low numbers, stereotypes, and harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 163–91. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v8.i2.40.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411–27. doi: 10.1002/sce.21007.
Said, Z., Summers, L. R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: Findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 621–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 7083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Rickoff, R. & Almarode, J. (2009). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32:1, 716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783190903386553.
Suter, L. E. (2017). Using international comparative data in achievement in educational research. In Wyse, D., Selwyn, N., Smith, E., & Suter, L. E. (Eds.), The BERA/Sage handbook of educational research (pp. 313335). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tenenbaum, H. R. & Callanan, M. A. (2008). Parent's science talk to their children in Mexican-descent families residing in the USA. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407084046.
Tenenbaum, H. R. & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39, 3447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34.
Turner, J. C., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., & Trucano, M. (2015). Teachers learning how to support student interest in mathematics and science. In Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M., & Hidi, S. (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 243–60). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi: 10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4.
Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity and aspirations toward science. In Lederman, N. G. & Abell, S. K. (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education (pp. 82103). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Clark, J. C. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Australian Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations. Available at https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/openpathinscitechmathenginprimsecschtrans.pdf.
Vedder-Wiess, D. & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 199216. doi: 10.1002/tea.20398.