Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:50:55.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Organizations and Creativity

from Part IV - Environments and Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

By
Roni Reiter-Palmon  and
Chelsa Dredge
Edited by
Sandra W. Russ ,
Jessica D. Hoffmann  and
James C. Kaufman
Sandra W. Russ
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Jessica D. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Creativity and innovation are important for organizational survival and growth, as globalization and technological advances increase the need to address rapid changes and uncertainty in the marketplace. As such, organizations and researchers have produced a significant amount of work on creativity and innovation to help address organizations’ need to develop creative ideas and solutions. These studies have yielded a variety of findings, sometimes contradictory, since organizational creativity is a multi-level issue; factors of creativity and innovation at one level may be different, not predictive, or even contradictory at another level. This chapter overviews these findings to summarize the factors in organizations that facilitate or hinder creativity and innovation at each manifested level: the individual, team, and organization. At the individual level, work on creativity and innovation focuses on the creative problem-solving process, personality of creative individuals, and motivational variables. At the team level, creativity and innovation focus on factors within leadership, team processes, and climate. Finally, creativity and innovation at the organizational level are overviewed regarding organizational strategy, goals and rewards, top management teams, and availability of resources.

Keywords

creativityinnovationorganizationsworkplacecreative problem solvingleadershipteam creativityrewardsgoalsorganizational strategy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity , pp. 460 - 479
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362–368. doi:10.2307/255984Google Scholar
Aleksic, D., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A., & Skerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 363–383. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809Google Scholar
Allen, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., Prange, K., Shuffler, M., & Barber, E. (2019). Leading after-action reviews among emergency responder teams: How perceptions of leader behaviors relate to proximal and distal outcomes. Occupational Health Science, 3(1), 59–81. doi:10.1007/s41542-019-00032-6Google Scholar
Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393Google Scholar
Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995Google Scholar
Amabile, T., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14–23. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T., Schatzel, E., Moneta, G., & Kramer, S. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003Google Scholar
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173. doi:10.1002/job.236Google Scholar
Arad, S., Hanson, M. A., & Schnieder, R. J. (1997). A framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42–58. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00780.xGoogle Scholar
Arreola, N., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). The effect of problem construction creativity on solution creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287–295. doi:10.1037/a0040389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Nijstad, B., & De Dreu, C. (2013). Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(10), 732–748. doi:10.1111/spc3.12062Google Scholar
Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183–193. doi:10.1177/0272431688082006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 332–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.xGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77–100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.xGoogle Scholar
Berg, J. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. doi:10.1177/0001839216642211Google Scholar
Blair, C., & Mumford, M. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 197–222. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.xGoogle Scholar
Bradley, B., Postlethwaite, B., Klotz, A., Hamdani, M., & Brown, K. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158. doi:10.1037/a0024200Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.504654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115–135. doi:10.1002/jocb.43Google Scholar
Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 105–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00373.xGoogle Scholar
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 385–389. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675Google Scholar
Curseu, P., & Schruijer, S. (2010). Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, Practice, 14(1), 66–79. doi:10.1037/a0017104Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. doi:10.5465/256406Google Scholar
DeChurch, L., Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Doty, D. (2013). Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process–state perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 559–578. doi:10.1037/a0032896Google Scholar
Desivilya, H., Somech, A., & Lidgoster, H. (2010). Innovation and conflict management in work teams: The effects of team identification and task and relationship conflict. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(1), 28–48. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2009.00048.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107. doi:10.1177/0149206305277795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wit, F., Greer, L., & Jehn, K. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. doi:10.2307/256994Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? The American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153–1166. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.11.1153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 329–333.Google Scholar
Ettlie, J. (1983). Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 27–44. doi:10.2307/256133Google Scholar
Fairchild, J., & Hunter, S. (2014). “We’ve got creative differences”: The effects of task conflict and participative safety on team creative performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 64–87. doi:10.1002/jocb.41Google Scholar
Farh, J., Lee, C., & Farh, C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173–1180. doi:10.1037/a0020015Google Scholar
Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, R., & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 5–25. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(82)90033-XGoogle Scholar
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In Taylor, I. A. & Getzels, J. W. (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 96–120). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Wu, J., Song, L., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829–844. doi:10.1037/apl0000185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greve, H. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702. doi:10.5465/30040661Google Scholar
Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487Google Scholar
Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameed, M., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 358–390. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, B., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Google Scholar
Hornberg, J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). Creativity and the Big Five personality traits: Is the relationship dependent on the creativity measure? In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and creativity (pp. 275–293). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, J., & Shea, C. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 180–211. doi:10.1177/1059601104273067Google Scholar
Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978Google Scholar
Hunter, S., Bedell, K., & Mumford, M. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15(2), 97–116. doi:10.1037/e518572013-253Google Scholar
Hunter, S., Bedell, K., & Mumford, M. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/10400410709336883Google Scholar
Hunter, S., & Cushenbery, L. (2015). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 621–639. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9386-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM (2010). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.Google Scholar
Jaussi, K., & Dionne, S. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 475–498. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00048-1Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S. & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17 , 465–495. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0Google Scholar
Kahn, S. (1990). What occupational safety tells us about political power in union firms. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(3), 481–496. doi:10.2307/2555621Google Scholar
Kanter, R. (1985). Innovation – the only hope for times ahead? Nursing Economics, 3(3), 178–182.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., Baer, J., Cropley, D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 332–340. doi:10.1037/a0034809Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2013). Do people recognize the Four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236. doi:10.1037/a0033295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547–555. doi:10.2307/3069369Google Scholar
Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147–157. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.xGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.xGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.xGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, J., Leenders, O., & van Engelen, J. (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.xGoogle Scholar
Kurtzberg, T., & Amabile, T. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 285–294. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_06Google Scholar
Licuanan, B., Dailey, L., & Mumford, M. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 1–27. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01279.xGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D., & Weingart, L. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. doi:10.2307/3069415Google Scholar
Ma, H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42. doi:10.1080/10400410802633400Google Scholar
MacCurtain, S., Flood, P., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M., & Dawson, J. (2010). The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 219–232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00564.xGoogle Scholar
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.xGoogle Scholar
Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785Google Scholar
Meyer, A., & Goes, J. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923. doi:10.2307/256344Google Scholar
Mumford, M., & Hunter, S. (2005). Multi-level issues in strategy and methods. In Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity, 9–73. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04001-4Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Lonergan, D., & Scott, G. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(1), 21–30. doi:10.5840/inquiryctnews20022213Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Mobley, M., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C., & Doares, L. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. doi:10.1080/10400419109534380Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Scott, G., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3Google Scholar
Nicholson, N., & West, M. (1988). Managerial job change: Men and women in transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in the Assessment of Justice, 31(4), 543–565. doi:10.1002/job.633Google Scholar
Oldham, G., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. doi:10.5465/256657Google Scholar
Parnes, S., & Noller, R. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part 1 – The development*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(1), 11–22. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00903.xGoogle Scholar
Perry-Smith, J., & Mannucci, P. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puryear, J., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. (2017). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: A systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 59–68. doi:10.1037/aca0000079Google Scholar
Redmond, M., Mumford, M., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1027Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Herman, A., & Yammarino, F. (2008). Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation. In creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition, 203–267. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(07)00009-4Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55–77. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Leone, S. (2019). Group dynamics and team creativity: The contribution of Kurt Lewin to the study of teams, creativity, and innovation. In Glǎveanu, V. (Ed.), The creativity reader (pp. 447–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mitchell, K., & Royston, R. (2019). Improving creativity in organizational settings: Applying research on creativity to organizations. In Sternberg, R. J. and Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 515–545). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M., O’Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 9–23. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_2Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Paulus, P. (2020). Cognitive and social processes in team creativity. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Creativity and innovation in organizations (pp. 161–190). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43–47. doi:10.1037/a0014629Google Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & de Vreede, T. (2011). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of team composition, social processes and cognition. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295–326). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 521–547. doi:10.1177/1059601116636476Google Scholar
Rostan, S. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 97–110. doi:10.1080/10400419409534517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–265. doi:10.1007/bf02213373Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-XGoogle Scholar
Salas, E., Stagl, K., Burke, C., & Goodwin, G. (2007). Fostering team effectiveness in organizations: Toward an integrative theoretical framework. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 52, 185–243. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1djmh0r.9Google Scholar
Schraw, G., Dunkle, M., & Bendixen, L. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 523–538. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090605Google Scholar
Scott, G., Leritz, L., & Mumford, M. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701Google Scholar
Shalley, C. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179–185. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.2.179Google Scholar
Shalley, C. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483–503. doi:10.2307/256689Google Scholar
Shalley, C., & Gilson, L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004Google Scholar
Shalley, C., & Perry-Smith, J. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1–22. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2918Google Scholar
Shalley, C., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007Google Scholar
Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41, 65–85. doi:10.2307/41166001Google Scholar
Silvia, P., Kaufman, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: Honesty-humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 687–689. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2014). How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 814–848. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0048Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Kock, A. (2011). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 819–832. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00851.xGoogle Scholar
Thamhain, H. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 297–311.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., Farmer, S., & Graen, G. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.xGoogle Scholar
Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2016). Beyond belief: Structured techniques prove more effective than a placebo intervention in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 153–159. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.009Google Scholar
Vincent, A., Decker, B., & Mumford, M. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 163–178. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1402_4Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1928). The great society: A psychological analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wang, D., & Hong, Y. (2010, Oct.). Word support and team creativity: The mediating effect of team psychological safety. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 1873–1876. doi:10.1109/ICIEEM.2010.5645894Google Scholar
Watts, L., Steele, L., Medeiros, K., & Mumford, M. (2019). Minding the gap between generation and implementation: Effects of idea source, goals, and climate on selecting and refining creative ideas. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 2–14. doi:10.1037/aca0000157Google Scholar
West, M. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups: Creativity and innovation implementation. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00951Google Scholar
West, M., Hirst, G., Richter, A., & Shipton, H. (2004). Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 269–299. doi:10.1080/1359432044400009Google Scholar
West, M. A., & Richter, A. W. (2008). Climates and cultures for innovation and creativity at work. Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 211–236.Google Scholar
Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997517Google Scholar
Yoon, W., Kim, S., & Song, J. (2016). Top management team characteristics and organizational creativity. Review of Managerial Science, 10(4), 757–779. doi:10.1007/s11846-015-0175-7Google Scholar
Yong, K., Sauer, S., & Mannix, E. (2014). Conflict and creativity in interdisciplinary teams. Small Group Research, 45(3), 266–289. doi:10.1177/1046496414530789Google Scholar
Yoon, H., Sung, S., Choi, J., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2015). Tangible and intangible rewards and employee creativity: The mediating role of situational extrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 383–393. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1088283Google Scholar
Zhou, J., & George, J. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. doi:10.2307/3069410Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×