Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:33:15.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Future Directions in Language Learning and Teaching

from Part VII - Moving Forward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Susan M. Gass
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

Looking into a crystal ball is a difficult task, but one that gives me leeway to take a broad view of the field and “think aloud” about where the future might take us. It is a dangerous task because within a year of publication (or less), it is likely that I will already be proven wrong. Nonetheless, I will attempt to take the pulse of the field as it was in the past, as it is today, and as it might be in the future. This paper has three parts. In the first part, I will look at the field historically and consider: (1) the relationship between language teaching and learning; (2) the overall growth of the field of second language acquisition (SLA) and its increasing distance from language teaching and the resulting quest for disciplinary identity; and (3) changes in emphases that suggest a narrowing of the gap.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 777 - 798
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235–243.Google Scholar
Benati, A. (2013). Issues in second language teaching. Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher’s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 825–827.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189–200.Google Scholar
Derrick, D. (2016). Instrument reporting practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 132–153.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245–258.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington: Report to the Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, C. (1957). Preface to Lado, R., Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2001). Changing views of language learning. In Trappes-Lomax, H. (ed.), BAAL Proceedings. Multilingual Matters. Change and Continuity in Applied Linguistics (pp. 51–67). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Fleck, C., Leder, N., & Svetics, I. (1998). Ahistoricity revisited: Does SLA have a theory? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 407–421.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (eds.) (2014). Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Madden, C. (eds.) (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Polio, C. (2014). Methodological Influences of Interlanguage (1972): Data then and data now. In Han, Z.-H. & Tarone, E. (eds.), Interlanguage 40 Years Later (pp. 147–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (eds.) (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Sterling, S. (2017). Ethics in ISLA. In Sato, M. & Loewen, S. (eds.) Handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 577–595). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2016). Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 577–600.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. (1979). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 123–143.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005). Investigations in instructed second language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Howatt, A.P.R. (2014). The history of teaching English as a foreign language from a British and European perspective. Language and History, 57, 75–95.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1979). Transfer and non–transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. (eds.) (1986). Cross-linguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 centuries of language teaching: An inquiry into the science, art, and development of language teaching methodology, 500 bc–1969. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2004). Sociocultural theory and second and foreign language learning: An overview of sociocultural theory. In van Esch, K. & St. John, O. (eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 13–34). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Second language acquisition research: Staking out the territory. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 315–350.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385–408.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., Smith, B., Bunting, M., & Doughty, C. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Gass, S. (2009). Research timeline: Statistical rigor in SLA. Language Teaching, 42, 181–196.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2017). The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Marsden, E. (2016). Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R. (2017). Foreign language educators’ exposure to research: Reported experiences, exposure via citations, and a proposal for action. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 613–642.Google Scholar
Matsuda, K., Arnett, C., & Labarca, A. (2015). Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2018). Online and offline effects of L1 practice in L2 grammar learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 459–475.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F., & Weinberger, S. (1988). The ontogenesis of the field of second language research. In Flynn, S. & O’Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 34–45). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (eds.) (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (eds.) (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2014). Issues in teaching, learning and testing speaking in a second language. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (eds.), Routledge handbook of instructed second language learning (pp. 505–521). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325–366.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 579–590.Google Scholar
Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Poehner, M. (2013). Dynamic assessment in the classroom. In Kunnan, A. (ed.) The companion to language assessment (pp. 677–692). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Polio, C. (2012). Replication in published applied linguistics research: An historical perspective. In Porte, G. (ed.), Replication in applied linguistics: A practical guide (pp. 47–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 499–508.Google Scholar
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies. An advanced resource book for students. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1988). Grammatical theory and L2 acquisition: A brief overview. In Flynn, S. & O’Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 404–416). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1978). Strategies, language transfer and the simulation of the second language learner’s mental operations. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 50–62.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Exploratory research on second language practice distribution: An aptitude × treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 27–56.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives (2nd edn.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1998). Programmatic ahistoricity in second language acquisition theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 387–405.Google Scholar
van Compernolle, R., & Williams, L. (2013) (guest eds.). Sociocultural theory and second language pedagogy [Special edition]. Language Teaching Research, 17(3).Google Scholar
Wagner-Gough, K., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning, 25, 297–308.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×