Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:57:46.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Problem-Solving and Intelligence

from Part V - Intelligence and Information Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

By
David Z. Hambrick ,
Alexander P. Burgoyne  and
Erik M. Altmann
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we discuss the link between intelligence and problem-solving. To preview, we argue that the ability to solve problems is not just an aspect or feature of intelligence – it is the essence of intelligence. We briefly review evidence from psychometric research concerning the nature of individual differences in intelligence, and then review evidence for how intelligence relates to complex problem-solving. We also consider the question of what mechanisms might underlie both problem-solving and intelligence, focusing on fluid intelligence and some of our own research on placekeeping ability. We then discuss the predictive validity of intelligence as it relates to job performance, mortality, expertise, and academic achievement. We also discuss practical uses of intelligence tests. Finally, we consider the question of whether intelligence as problem-solving ability can be improved through training. We close with directions for future research.

Keywords

problem-solvingintelligenceindividual differencespredictive validityplacekeeping abilitytransfer of trainingjob performanceacademic achievementexpertise
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 553 - 579
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Arthur, W., Barret, G. V., & Alexander, R. A. (1991). Prediction of vehicular accident involvement: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 4, 89–105.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A. (1909/1975). Modern ideas about children (trans. S. Heisler). California: University of California.Google Scholar
Bingham, W. V. (1937). Aptitudes and aptitude testing. Oxford: Harpers.Google Scholar
Brown, R. E. (2016). Hebb and Cattell: The genesis of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(606). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00606Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., & Altmann, E. M. (in press). Placekeeping ability as a component of fluid intelligence: Not just working memory capacity. American Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Sala, G., Gobet, F., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2016). The relationship between cognitive ability and chess skill: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Intelligence, 59, 72–83.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chooi, W. T., & Thompson, L. A. (2012). Working memory training does not improve intelligence in healthy young adults. Intelligence, 40, 531–542.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cognitive Training Data (2014). Cognitive training data response letter. www.cognitivetrainingdata.org/the-controversy-does-brain-training-work/response-letterGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., & Kovacs, K. (2013). Individual differences in intelligence and working memory: A review of latent variable models. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 58, 233–270.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar
Danner, D., Hagemann, D., Holt, D. V., Hager, M., Schankin, A., Wüstenberg, S., et al. (2011). Measuring performance in dynamic decision making. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 225–233.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychometrics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13–21.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., & Whalley, L. J. (2001). Longitudinal cohort study of childhood IQ and survival up to age 76. British Medical Journal, 322, 819–822.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (trans. L. Lees). Psychological Monographs, 58, i–113.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2018). Working memory and executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 190–193.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2013). My exploration of Gagné’s “evidence” for innate talent. It is Gagné who is omitting troublesome information so as to present more convincing accusations. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 223–256). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2018a). Superior working memory in experts. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 696–713). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2018b). Intelligence as domain-specific reproducible performance: The role of acquired domain-specific mechanisms in expert performance. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 85–100). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Moxley, J. (2013). Working memory that mediates experts’ performance: Why it is qualitatively different from traditional working memory. In Alloway, T. P. & Alloway, R. (Eds.), Working memory: The connected intelligence (pp. 109–136). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. N., & McDaniel, M. A. (2001). The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman’s (1988) model and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 60–79.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (2016). Lumosity to pay $2 million to settle FTC deceptive advertising charges for its “brain training” program. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/01/lumosity-pay-2-million-settle-ftc-deceptive-advertising-chargesGoogle Scholar
Ferriman Robertson, K., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351.Google Scholar
Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In Frensch, P. A. & Funke, J. (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A. G., Cowie, R., Crothers, I., Jordan-Black, J. A., & Satava, R. M. (2003). PicSOr: an objective test of perceptual skill that predicts laparoscopic technical skill in three initial studies of laparoscopic performance. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 17, 1468–1471.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Who owns intelligence? The Atlantic Monthly, 283, 67–76.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 1–4.Google Scholar
Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Wüstenberg, S., Sonnleitner, P., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2013a). A multitrait-multimethod study of assessment instruments for complex problem solving. Intelligence, 41, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Dynamic problem solving: A new assessment perspective. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 189–213.Google Scholar
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Molnár, G., Fischer, A., Funke, J., & Csapó, B. (2013b). Complex problem solving in educational contexts – Something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 364–379.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., & Altmann, E. M. (2015). The role of placekeeping ability in fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1104–1110.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Altmann, E. M., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2018). A knowledge activation approach to testing the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 131, 307–321.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Altmann, E. M., Oswald, F. L., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Accounting for expert performance: The devil is in the details. Intelligence, 45, 112–114.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Burgoyne, A. P., & Oswald, F. L. (in press). Domain-general models of expertise: The role of cognitive ability. In Ward, P., Schraagen, J. M., Gore, J., & Roth, E. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of expertise: Research and application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2409–2419.Google Scholar
Hart, C. L., Taylor, M. D., Smith, G. D., Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., Hole, D. J., et al. (2003). Childhood IQ, social class, deprivation, and their relationships with mortality and morbidity risk in later life: Prospective observational study linking the Scottish Mental Survey 1932 and the Midspan studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 877–883.Google Scholar
Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1942). The effect of early and late brain injury upon test scores, and the nature of normal adult intelligence. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 85, 275–292.Google Scholar
Henry, R. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1987). Stability of skilled performance across time: Some generalizations and limitations on utilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6829–6833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. (1999). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.Google Scholar
Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopiez, R., & Lee, J. (2006). Towards a dynamic model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 8, 97–120.Google Scholar
Kopiez, R., & Lee, J. (2008). Towards a general model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 10, 41–62.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, A., Neubert, J. C., Wüstenberg, S., & Greiff, S. (2016). Construct validity of complex problem solving: A comprehensive view on different facets of intelligence and school grades. Intelligence, 54, 55–69.Google Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.Google Scholar
Kuncel, N., & Sackett, P. (2018). The truth about the SAT and ACT. Wall Street Journal, March 8. www.wsj.com/articles/the-truth-about-the-sat-and-act-1520521861Google Scholar
Kunda, M., Soulières, I., Rozga, A., & Goel, A. K. (2016). Error patterns on the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Intelligence, 59, 181–198.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C. (2002). g: Knowledge, speed, strategies, or working-memory capacity? A systems perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. & Gigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 415–445). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D. (2009). Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype. Behavioral Genetics, 39, 350–358.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Moreau, D. (2016). How important is deliberate practice? Reply to Ericsson (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 355–358.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (2013). Problem solving. In Reisberg, D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 769–778). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity, frontal lobe functioning, and general fluid intelligence: An adult lifespan study. Neuropsychology, 22, 638–644.Google Scholar
McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 512–534.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar
NBC Nightly News (2016). Lumosity to pay $2M over allegations that its ads deceived customers. January 5. www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw67Vf_EwAw&gl=UG&hl=en-GBGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19(10), 957–961.Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, B., Robbins, S., Rickerson, J., & McKinniss, T. (2009). The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 711–716.Google Scholar
Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 359–379.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. L., & Bonaccio, S. (2011). On the myth and the reality of the temporal validity degradation of general mental ability test scores. Intelligence, 39, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418–436.Google Scholar
Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D., Griscom, W. S., & Cirullo, B. A. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330–338.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Pressing issues in cognitive aging. In Park, D. & Swartz, N. (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 43–54). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A., & Pink, J. E. (2008). Why is working memory related to fluid intelligence? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 364–371.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. N., & Goff, S. (1988). Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 46–57.Google Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: Maintenance and disengagement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 771–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 103–186.Google Scholar
Sonnleitner, P., Keller, U., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2013). Students’ complex problem-solving abilities: Their structure and relations to reasoning ability and educational success. Intelligence, 41, 289–305.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.Google Scholar
Stadler, M., Becker, N., Gödker, M., Leutner, D., & Greiff, S. (2015). Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 92–101.Google Scholar
Stanford Center on Longevity (2014). A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community. http://longevity.stanford.edu/a-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2Google Scholar
Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985b). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6791–6792.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and Raven. Intelligence, 33, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1965). Ability factors and environmental influences. American Psychologist, 20, 723–733.Google Scholar
Walshe, E. A., McIntosh, C. W., Romer, R., & Winston, F. K. (2017). Executive function capacities, negative driving behavior and crashes in young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, E1314.Google Scholar
Wigdor, A., & Green, B. F. Jr. (1991). Performance assessment for the workplace, 2 vols. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving – More than reasoning? Intelligence, 40, 1–14.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×