Adam, D. (ed.) (2018). The genius within: Smart pills, brain hacks and adventures in intelligence. London: Picador.Google Scholar

Albensi, B.C., Oliver, D. R., Toupin, J., & Odero, G. (2007). Electrical stimulation protocols for hippocampal synaptic plasticity and neuronal hyper-excitability: Are they effective or relevant? Experimental Neurology, 204, 1–13.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1999). Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1120–1136.Google ScholarPubMed

Baniqued, P., Kranz, M. B., Voss, M. W., Lee, H., Casman, J. D., Severson, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2014). Cognitive training with casual video games: Points to consider. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1010.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K. (2018). Network neuroscience theory of human intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 8–20.Google Scholar

Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., Pouget, A., & Schrater, P. (2012). Brain plasticity through the life span: Learning to learn and action video games. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 35, 391–416.Google Scholar

Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.Google Scholar

Bourrier, S. C., Berman, M. G., & Enns, J. T. (2018). Cognitive strategies and natural environments interact in influencing executive function. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen-Kadosh, R. (ed.) (2014). The stimulated brain. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Daugherty, A. M., Zwillinga, C., Paula, E. J., Sherepaa, N., Allena, C., Kramer, A. F., … Barbey, A. K. (2018). Multi-modal fitness and cognitive training to enhance fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 66, 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.11.001.Google Scholar

Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4–12 years old. Science, 333(6054), 959–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I., & Posner, M. I. (2005). The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage, 26(2), 471–479.Google Scholar

Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, M. & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(14), 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farah, M. J. (2015). The unknowns of cognitive enhancement. Science, 379(3), 379–380.Google Scholar

Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Gallen, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2019). Brain modularity: A biomarker of intervention-related plasticity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 23(4), 293–304.Google Scholar

Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video games modify visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2008). Exercising your brain: A review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 692–701.Google Scholar

Green, C. S., Sugarman, M. A., Medford, K., Klobusicky, E., & Bavelier, D. (2012). The effect of action video game experience ontask-switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2409–2419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000) The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 185–207.Google Scholar

Hillman, C. H., Erickson, K. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), 58–65.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., & Carter, O. (2015). Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation, 8(3), 535–550.Google Scholar

Husain, M., & Mehta, M. A. (2011). Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(1), 28–36.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, A. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 196829–196833.Google Scholar

Klingberg, T., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2002). Training of working memory in children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(6), 781–791.Google Scholar

Lynch, G. (1998). Memory and the brain: Unexpected chemistries and a new pharmacology. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 70(1–2), 82–100.Google Scholar

Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Monturori, S., Foti, F., Giampaolo, F. Sorrentino, P., & Sorrentino, G. (2018). Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: Biological and psychological benefits. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 509.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervag, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other mMeasures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534.Google Scholar

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H. L., … Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108(7), 2693–2698.Google Scholar

Neville, H. J., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Bell, T. A., Fanning, J., Klein, S., & Isbell, E. (2013). Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110(29), 12138–12143.Google Scholar

Peng, P., & Miller, A. C. (2016). Does attention training work? A selective meta-analysis to explore the effects of attention training and moderators. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 77–87.Google Scholar

Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piscopo, D., Weible, A., Rothbart, M. K., Posner, M. I., & Niell, C. M. (2018). Changes in white matter in mice resulting from low frequency brain stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115(27), 6639–6646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802160115.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I., Tang, Y. Y., & Lynch, G. (2014) Mechanisms of white matter change induced by meditation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01220.Google Scholar

Redick, T. S. (2019) The hype cycle in working memory training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 1–7.Google Scholar

Reinhart, R. M. G. (2017). Disruption and rescue of interareal theta phase coupling and adaptive behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(43), 11542–11547.Google Scholar

Reinhart, R. M. G., & Woodman, G. F. (2015). Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(2), 625–630.Google Scholar

Reinhart, R. M. G., Zhu, J., Park, S., & Woodman, G. F. (2015). Synchronizing theta oscillations with direct-current stimulation strengthens adaptive control in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(30), 9448–9453.Google Scholar

Rinne, P., Hassan, M., Goniotakis, D., Chohan, K., Sharma, P., Langdon, D., … Bentley, P. (2013). Triple dissociation of attention networks in stroke according to lesion location. Neurology, 81(9), 812–820.Google Scholar

Roberts, B. M., Clarke, A., Addante, R. J., & Ranganath, C. (2018). Entrainment enhances theta oscillations and improves episodic memory. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(3–4), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rueda, M. R., Checa, P., & Combita, L. M. (2012). Enhanced efficiency of the executive attention network after training in preschool children: Immediate and after two month effects. Developemental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(Supp 1), S192–S204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B., Saccamanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102(41), 14931–14936.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Brem, A.-K., Levenbaum, E., Thompson, T., Kadosh, R. C., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2015). Enhancing cognition using transcranial electrical stimulation Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 4, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sasaki, S. R., Tsuiki, S., Miyaguchi, S., Kojima, S., Masaki, M., Otsuru, N., & Onishi, H. (2016). Comparison of three non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation methods for increasing cortical excitability. Fontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 668. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00668.Google Scholar

Simons, D. J. , Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Sohlberg, M. M., McLaughlin, K. A., Pavese, A., Heidrich, A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Evaluation of attention process therapy training in persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(5), 656–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tang, Y. Y., Holzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(5), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tang, Y., Lu, Q., Geng, X., Stein, E. A., Yang, Y., & Posner, M. I. (2010) Short term mental training induces white-matter changes in the anterior cingulate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(35), 15649–15652.Google Scholar

Tang, Y. Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., … Posner, M. I. (2007). Short term meditation training improves attention and self regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104(43), 17152–17156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tang, Y. Y., & Posner, M. I. (2009). Attention training and attention state training. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(5), 222–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tang, Y. Y., & Posner, M. I. (2014). Training brain networks and states. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18(7), 345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.002.Google Scholar

Tang, Y. Y., Tang, R., & Posner, M. I. (2013). Brief meditation training induces smoking reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110(34), 13971–13975.Google Scholar

Thimm, M., Fink, G. R., Kust, J., Karbe, H., Sturm, W. (2006). Impact of alertness training on spatial neglect: A behavioural and fMRI study. Neuropsychology, 44(7), 1230–1246.Google Scholar

Van Kessel, M. E., Geurts, A. C. H., Brouwer, W. H., & Fasotti, L. (2013). Visual scanning training for neglect after stroke with and without a computerized lane tracking dual task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 358.Google Scholar

Vinogradova, O. S., Kitchigina, V. F., Kudina, T. A., & Zenchenko, K. I. (1999). Spontaneous activity and sensory responses of hippocampal neurons during persistent theta-rhythm evoked by median raphe nucleus blockade in rabbit. Neuroscience, 94(3), 745–753. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00253-5.Google Scholar

Voelker, P., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2016) A polymorphism related to methylation influences attention during performance of speeded skills. AIMS Neuroscience, 3(1), 40–55.Google Scholar

Ward, N., Paul, E., Watson, P., Cook, G. E., Hillman, C. H., Cohen, N. J., … Barbey, A. K. (2017). Enhanced learning through multimodal training: Evidence from a comprehensive cognitive, physical fitness, and neuroscience intervention. Scientific Reports, 7, 5808 doi: 10.1038/s41598–017-06237-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Willis, S. L.., Tennstedt, S. L., Mariske, M., Ball, K., Elias, J., Koepke, K. M., … Wright, E. (2006). Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(23), 2805–2814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhang, Q., Wang, C. P., Zhao, Q. W., Yang, L., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2019). The malleability of executive function in early childhood: Effects of schooling and targeted training. Development Science, 22(2), e12748.Google Scholar

Zwilling, C. E., Daugherty, A. M., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J., & Barbey, A. K. (2018). Enhanced decision-making through multimodal training. NPJ Science of Learning, 4(1). doi: 10.1038/s41539–019-0049.Google Scholar

Arbula, S., Ambrosini, E., Della Puppa, A., De Pellegrin, S., Anglani, M., Denaro, L., … Vallesi, A. (2020). Focal left prefrontal lesions and cognitive impairment: A multivariate lesion-symptom mapping approach. Neuropsychologia, 136, 107253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107253.Google Scholar

Axelrod, B. N., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Schinka, J. A. (1999). Comparing methods for estimating premorbid intellectual functioning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(4), 341–346. doi: 10.1016/S0887–6177(98)00028-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aziz-Zadeh, L., Kaplan, J. T., & Iacoboni, M. (2009). “Aha!”: The neural correlates of verbal insight solutions. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 908–916. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20554.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Belli, A., Logan, A., Rubin, R., Zamroziewicz, M., & Operskalski, J. T. (2015). Network topology and dynamics in traumatic brain injury. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 4, 92–102.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., & Grafman, J. (2013). Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human intelligence. Neuropsychologia, 51(7), 1361–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., & Grafman, J. (2014). Distributed neural system for emotional intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 265–272. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss124.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Paul, E. J., Chau, A., Solomon, J., & Grafman, J. H. (2014). Lesion mapping of social problem solving. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 137(10), 2823–2833. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu207.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Paul, E., Forbes, C., Krueger, F., Goldman, D., & Grafman, J. (2014). Preservation of general intelligence following traumatic brain injury: Contributions of the Met66 brain-derived neurotrophic factor. PLoS One, 9(2), e838733.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Paul, E. J., & Grafman, J. (2014). Architecture of fluid intelligence and working memory revealed by lesion mapping. Brain Structure & Function, 219(2), 485–494. doi: 10.1007/s00429–013-0512-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Solomon, J., Krueger, F., Forbes, C., & Grafman, J. (2012). An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain, 135(4), 1154–1164. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barona, A., Reynolds, C. R., & Chastain, R. (1984). A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(5), 885.Google Scholar

Benedictus, M. R., Spikman, J. M., & van der Naalt, J. (2010). Cognitive and behavioral impairment in traumatic brain injury related to outcome and return to work. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9), 1436–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bianchi, L. (1922). The mechanism of the brain and the function of the frontal lobes. Edinburgh: Livingstone. doi: 10.1192/bjp.68.283.402.Google Scholar

Blair, J. R., & Spreen, O. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3(2), 129–136.Google Scholar

Boes, A. D., Prasad, S., Liu, H., Liu, Q., Pascual-Leone, A., Caviness, V. S. Jr, & Fox, M. D. (2015). Network localization of neurological symptoms from focal brain lesions. Brain, 138(10), 3061–3075.Google Scholar

Bright, P., & van der Linde, I. (2020). Comparison of methods for estimating premorbid intelligence. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1445650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen-Zimerman, S., Kachian, Z. R., Krueger, F., Gordon, B., & Grafman, J. (2019). Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 124, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001.Google Scholar

Cohen-Zimerman, S., Salvi, C., Krueger, F., Gordon, B., & Grafman, J. (2018). Intelligence across the seventh decade in patients with brain injuries acquired in young adulthood. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 13, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2018.08.001.Google Scholar

Colom, R., & Flores-Mendoza, C. E. (2007). Intelligence predicts scholastic achievement irrespective of SES factors: Evidence from Brazil. Intelligence, 35(3), 243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.008.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. R., Deary, I. J., Starr, J., & Whalley, L. J. (2001). The NART as an index of prior intellectual functioning: A retrospective validity study covering a 66-year interval. Psychological Medicine, 31(3), 451–458. doi: 10.1017/S0033291701003634.Google Scholar

Danek, A., & Salvi, C. (2018). Moment of truth: Why Aha! experiences are correct. Journal of Creative Behavior. doi: 10.1002/jocb.380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., … Emslie, H. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289(5478), 457–460. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5478.457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eimontaite, I., Goel, V., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., Schindler, I., & Grafman, J. (2018). Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content. Neuropsychologia, 119, 320–329.Google Scholar

Gläscher, J., Rudrauf, D., Colom, R., Paul, L. K., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(10), 4705–4709. Retrieved from www.pnas.org/content/107/10/4705.abstractGoogle Scholar

Goel, V., Grafman, J., Tajik, J., Gana, S., & Danto, D. (1997). A study of the performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions in a financial planning task. Brain, 120(10), 1805–1822. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goel, V., Lam, E., Smith, K. W., Goel, A., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2017). Lesions to polar/orbital prefrontal cortex selectively impair reasoning about emotional material. Neuropsychologia, 99, 236–245.Google Scholar

Goel, V., Makale, M., & Grafman, J. (2004). The hippocampal system mediates logical reasoning about familiar spatial environments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 654–664.Google Scholar

Goel, V., Marling, M., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2019). Patients with lesions to left prefrontal cortex (BA 9 and BA 10) have less entrenched beliefs and are more skeptical reasoners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(11), 1674–1688.Google Scholar

Goel, V., Stollstorff, M., Nakic, M., Knutson, K., & Grafman, J. (2009). A role for right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in reasoning about indeterminate relations. Neuropsychologia, 47(13), 2790–2797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottfredson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2009). Intelligence: Foundations and issues in assessment. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 183.Google Scholar

Grafman, J., Jonas, B. S., Martin, A., Salazar, A. M., Weingartner, H., Ludlow, C., … Vance, S. C. (1988). Intellectual function following penetrating head-injury in Vietnam veterans. Brain, 111(1), 169–184.Google Scholar

Hamburg, S., Lowe, B., Startin, C. M., Padilla, C., Coppus, A., Silverman, W., … Strydom, A. (2019). Assessing general cognitive and adaptive abilities in adults with Down syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 11(1), 20. doi: 10.1186/s11689–019-9279-8.Google Scholar

Harlow, J. M. (1868). Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society, 2, 327–347. doi: 10.1177/0957154X9300401407.Google Scholar

Hillary, F. G., & Grafman, J. H. (2017). Injured brains and adaptive networks: The benefits and costs of hyperconnectivity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(5), 385–401. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ip, R. Y., Dornan, J., & Schentag, C. (1995). Traumatic brain injury: Factors predicting return to work or school. Brain Injury, 9(5), 517–532. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008211.Google Scholar

Jouandet, M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1979). The frontal lobes. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), Neuropsychology. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, vol 2 (pp. 25–59). Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3944-1_2Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 135–154.Google Scholar

Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., … Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), 500–510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097.Google Scholar

Kesler, S. R., Adams, H. F., Blasey, C. M., & Bigler, E. D. (2003). Premorbid intellectual functioning, education, and brain size in traumatic brain injury: An investigation of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Applied Neuropsychology, 10(3), 153–162.Google Scholar

Königs, M., Engenhorst, P. J., & Oosterlaan, J. (2016). Intelligence after traumatic brain injury: Meta-analysis of outcomes and prognosis. European Journal of Neurology, 23(1), 21–29. doi: 10.1111/ene.12719.Google Scholar

Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 71–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154.Google Scholar

Krueger, F., Pardini, M., Huey, E. D., Raymont, V., Solomon, J., Lipsky, R. H., … Grafman, J. (2011). The role of the Met66 brain-derived neurotrophic factor allele in the recovery of executive functioning after combat-related traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(2), 598–606.Google Scholar

Laukkonen, R., Webb, M., Salvi, C., Tange, J., and Shooler, J. (2020). Eureka heuristics: How feelings of insight signal the quality of a new idea. PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/ez3tn.Google Scholar

Luria, A. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7741-2.Google Scholar

Mani, K., Cater, B., & Hudlikar, A. (2017). Cognition and return to work after mild/moderate traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Work, 58(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67(2), 130.Google Scholar

Nunnari, D., Bramanti, P., & Marino, S. (2014). Cognitive reserve in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. Neurological Sciences, 35(10), 1513–1518. doi: 10.1007/s10072–014-1897-z.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. J. (2000). Prediction of return to work following traumatic brain injury: Intellectual, memory, and demographic variables. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45(2), 212–217. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.45.2.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orme, D. R., Brehm, W., & Ree, M. J. (2001). Armed Forces Qualification Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence. Military Psychology, 13(4), 187–197. doi: 10.1207/S15327876MP1304_1.Google Scholar

Palmiero, C., Piccardi, M., Nori, L., Palermo, R., Salvi, L., & Guariglia, C. (2019). Creativity: Education and rehabilitation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01500.Google Scholar

Raymont, V., Greathouse, A., Reding, K., Lipsky, R., Salazar, A., & Grafman, J. (2008). Demographic, structural and genetic predictors of late cognitive decline after penetrating head injury. Brain, 131(2), 543–558. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm300.Google Scholar

Raymont, V., Salazar, A. M., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). Studying injured minds – the Vietnam head injury study and 40 years of brain injury research. Frontiers in Neurology, 2, 15. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00015Google Scholar

Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 86–89.Google Scholar

Reverberi, C., Toraldo, A., D’Agostini, S., & Skrap, M. (2005). Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. Brain, 128(12), 2882–2890. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh577.Google Scholar

Rostami, E., Krueger, F., Zoubak, S., Dal Monte, O., Raymont, V., Pardini, M., … Grafman, J. (2011). BDNF polymorphism predicts general intelligence after penetrating traumatic brain injury. PLoS One, 6(11), e27389. doi: org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027389.Google Scholar

Salvi, C., Beeman, M., Bikson, M., McKinley, R., & Grafman, J. (2020). TDCS to the right anterior temporal lobe facilitates insight problem-solving. Science Reports, 10, 946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57724-1.Google Scholar

Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). Sudden insight is associated with shutting down visual inputs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1814–1819. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0.Google Scholar

Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(4), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798.Google Scholar

Salvi, C., Simoncini, C., Grafman, J., & Beeman, M. (2020). Oculometric signature of switch into awareness? Pupil size predicts sudden insight whereas microsaccades predict problem-solving via analysis. Neuroimage, 217, 116933. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116933.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Sprugnoli, G., Bricolo, E., Constantini, G., Liew, S. L., Musaeus, C. S., … Rossi, S. (2019). Gamma tACS over the temporal lobe increases the occurrence of Eureka! moments. Scientific Reports, 9, 5778. doi: 10.1038/s41598–019-42192-z.Google Scholar

Schoenberg, M. R., Lange, R. T., Brickell, T. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2007). Estimating premorbid general cognitive functioning for children and adolescents using the American Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth edition: Demographic and current performance approaches. Journal of Child Neurology, 22(4), 379–388. doi: 10.1177/0883073807301925.Google Scholar

Schwab, K., Grafman, J., Salazar, A. M., & Kraft, J. (1993). Residual impairments and work status 15 years after penetrating head injury. Neurology, 43(1 Part 1), 95. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.1_Part_1.95.Google Scholar

Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511526817.Google Scholar

Shuren, J. E., & Grafman, J. (2002). The neurology of reasoning. Archives of Neurology, 59(6), 916–919.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8.Google Scholar

Spikman, J. M., Timmerman, M. E., Milders, M. V, Veenstra, W. S., & van der Naalt, J. (2011). Social cognition impairments in relation to general cognitive deficits, injury severity, and prefrontal lesions in traumatic brain injury patients. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29(1), 101–111. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2084.Google Scholar

Sprugnoli, G., Rossi, S., Emmerdorfer, A., Rossi, A., Liew, S., Tatti, E., … Santarnecchi, E. (2017). Neural correlates of Eureka moment. Intelligence, 62, 99–118. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.004.Google Scholar

Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2015–2028. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004.Google Scholar

Tik, M., Sladky, S., Luft, C., Willinger, D., Hoffmann, A., Banissy, M., … Windischberger, C. (2018). Ultra-high-field fMRI insights on insight: Neural correlates of the Aha!-moment. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 3241–3252.Google Scholar

Unterrainer, J. M., & Owen, A. M. (2006). Planning and problem solving: From neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4), 308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.014.Google Scholar

Vakhtin, A. A., Ryman, S. G., Flores, R. A., & Jung, R. E. (2014). Functional brain networks contributing to the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory of Intelligence. NeuroImage, 103, 349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waechter, R. L., Goel, V., Raymont, V., Kruger, F., & Grafman, J. (2013). Transitive inference reasoning is impaired by focal lesions in parietal cortex rather than rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 464–471.Google Scholar

Wardlaw, C., Hicks, A. J., Sherer, M., & Ponsford, J. L. (2018). Psychological resilience is associated with participation outcomes following mild to severe traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 563. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00563.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins Co. doi: 10.1037/11167-000.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler Test of Adult Reading: WTAR. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2008a). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Wechsler, D. (2008b). Wechsler adult intelligence scale – Fourth edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Allegrini, A. G., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., von Stumm, S., Pingault, J. B., & Plomin, R. (2019). Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(6), 819–827.Google Scholar

Ansari, D., Coch, D., & De Smedt, B. (2011). Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 37–42.Google Scholar

Asbury, K. (2015). Can genetics research benefit educational interventions for all? Hastings Center Report, 45(S1), S39–S42.Google Scholar

Asbury, K., & Plomin, R. (2013). G is for genes: The impact of genetics on education and achievement, Vol. 24. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Blakemore, S. J. (2018). Inventing ourselves: The secret life of the teenage brain. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Boliver, V., & Swift, A. (2011). Do comprehensive schools reduce social mobility? The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 89–110.Google Scholar

Bowers, J. S. (2016a). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(5), 600–612.Google Scholar

Bowers, J. S. (2016b). Psychology, not educational neuroscience, is the way forward for improving educational outcomes for all children: Reply to Gabrieli (2016) and Howard-Jones et al. (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 628–635.Google Scholar

Broer, T., Cunningham-Burley, S., Deary, I., & Pickersgill, M. (2016). Neuroscience, policy and family life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Bruer, J. T. (1999). The myth of the first three years: A new understanding of early brain development and lifelong learning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Calvin, C. M., Batty, G. D., Der, G., Brett, C. E., Taylor, A., Pattie, A., … & Deary, I. J. (2017). Childhood intelligence in relation to major causes of death in 68 year follow-up: Prospective population study. British Medical Journal, 357(8112), j2708.Google Scholar

Calvin, C. M., Deary, I. J., Fenton, C., Roberts, B. A., Der, G., Leckenby, N., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: Systematic review with meta-analysis. International journal of epidemiology, 40(3), 626–644.Google Scholar

Crosswaite, M., & Asbury, K. (2016). “Mr Cummings clearly does not understand the science of genetics and should maybe go back to school on the subject”: An exploratory content analysis of the online comments beneath a controversial news story. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 12(1), 11.Google Scholar

Crosswaite, M., & Asbury, K. (2019). Teacher beliefs about the aetiology of individual differences in cognitive ability, and the relevance of behavioural genetics to education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 95–110.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 487–506.Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (2016). Education and intelligence: Pity the poor teacher because student characteristics are more significant than teachers or schools. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19(e93), 1–11.Google Scholar

Eagleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The hidden life of the brain. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Erickson, K. I., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., Basak, C., Szabo, A., Chaddock, L., … Wojcicki, T. R. (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 3017–3022.Google Scholar

Francis, B., Connolly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D., … Travers, M. C. (2017). Attainment grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? A mixed methods exploration of self confidence and set level among year 7 students. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378.Google Scholar

Frith, U., Bishop, D., Blakemore, C., Blakemore, S. J., Butterworth, B., & Goswami, U. (2011). Neuroscience: Implications for education and lifelong learning. The Royal Society.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). The promise of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 613–619.Google Scholar

Gale, C. R., Batty, G. D., Tynelius, P., Deary, I. J., & Rasmussen, F. (2010). Intelligence in early adulthood and subsequent hospitalisation and admission rates for the whole range of mental disorders: Longitudinal study of 1,049,663 men. Epidemiology, 21(1), 70–77.Google Scholar

Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2018). Grammar schools in England: A new analysis of social segregation and academic outcomes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(7), 909–924.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132.Google Scholar

Grantham-McGregor, S. (2005). Can the provision of breakfast benefit school performance? Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 26(2 suppl 2), S144–S158.Google Scholar

Hagenauer, M. H., Perryman, J. I., Lee, T. M., & Carskadon, M. A. (2009). Adolescent changes in the homeostatic and circadian regulation of sleep. Developmental Neuroscience, 31(4), 276–284.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2016). The neuroscience of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haworth, C. M., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Martin, N. G., de Geus, E. J., van Beijsterveldt, C. E., … Kovas, Y. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15(11), 1112–1120.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., Bryant, A., Gathercole, S. E., & CALM Team. (2019). Protocol for a transdiagnostic study of children with problems of attention, learning and memory (CALM). BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), 10.Google Scholar

Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., … & Thomas, M. S. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016), Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Brett, C. E., & Deary, I. J. (2010). The pivotal role of education in the association between ability and social class attainment: A look across three generations. Intelligence, 38(1), 55–65.Google Scholar

Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J. B., … & Plomin, R. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 15273–15278.Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., … & Fontana, M. A. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50(8), 1112–1121.Google Scholar

Ludwig, J., & Phillips, D. A. (2007). The benefits and costs of Head Start (No. w12973). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malanchini, M., Engelhardt, L. E., Grotzinger, A. D., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2019). “Same but different”: Associations between multiple aspects of self-regulation, cognition, and academic abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1164–1188.Google Scholar

Nicholas, S., Andrieu, B., Croizet, J. C., Sanitioso, R. B., & Burman, J. T. (2013). Sick? Or slow? On the origins of intelligence as a psychological object. Intelligence, 41(5), 699–711.Google Scholar

Owens, J. A., Belon, K., & Moss, P. (2010). Impact of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep, mood, and behavior. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(7), 608–614.Google Scholar

Parker, P. D., Jerrim, J., Schoon, I., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A multination study of socioeconomic inequality in expectations for progression to higher education: The role of between-school tracking and ability stratification. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 6–32.Google Scholar

Pearson, K. (1914). On the handicapping of the first-born, Vol. 10. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Penke, L., Maniega, S. M., Bastin, M. E., Hernández, M. V., Murray, C., Royle, N. A., … Deary, I. J. (2012). Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(10), 1026–1030.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: Five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20(1), 98–108.Google Scholar

Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., … Gore, J. C. (1996). Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119(4), 1221–1238.Google Scholar

Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R., Heid, C., Broene, P., Jenkins, F., … Downer, J. (2012). Third grade follow-up to the Head Start impact study: Final report. OPRE Report 2012-45b. Administration for Children & Families (pp. 1–346) Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R., Heid, C., Shapiro, G., Broene, P., … Ciarico, J. (2010). Head Start impact study. Final report. Administration for Children & Families (611 pp).Google Scholar

Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 780–789.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369.Google Scholar

Rose, N. (2010). “Screen and intervene”: Governing risky brains. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 79–105.Google Scholar

Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & Kaufman, A. S. (2017). Let’s not do away with comprehensive cognitive assessments just yet. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(1), 8–20.Google Scholar

Schofield, J. W. (2010). International evidence on ability grouping with curriculum differentiation and the achievement gap in secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1492–1528.Google Scholar

Shager, H. M., Schindler, H. S., Magnuson, K. A., Duncan, G. J., Yoshikawa, H., & Hart, C. M. (2013). Can research design explain variation in Head Start research results? A meta-analysis of cognitive and achievement outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 76–95.Google Scholar

Sigman, M., Peña, M., Goldin, A. P., & Ribeiro, S. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Prime time to build the bridge. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 497–502.Google Scholar

Smith-Woolley, E., Ayorech, Z., Dale, P. S., von Stumm, S., & Plomin, R. (2018). The genetics of university success. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 14579.Google Scholar

Smith-Woolley, E., Pingault, J. B., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, E., von Stumm, S., … Kovas, Y. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. NPJ Science of Learning, 3(1), 3.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, H. M., & Ansari, D. (2018). Understanding the effects of education through the lens of biology. NPJ Science of Learning, 3(1), 17.Google Scholar

Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899.Google Scholar

Supekar, K., Swigart, A. G., Tenison, C., Jolles, D. D., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Fuchs, L., & Menon, V. (2013). Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), 8230–8235.Google Scholar

Taylor, B., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M. C. (2017). Factors deterring schools from mixed attainment teaching practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(3), 327–345.Google Scholar

Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P. (2017). A behavioral genetic perspective on noncognitive factors and academic achievement. Genetics, Ethics and Education, 134–158.Google Scholar

von Stumm, S., Smith-Woolley, E., Ayorech, Z., McMillan, A., Rimfeld, K., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2020). Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12925.Google Scholar

Wai, J., Brown, M., & Chabris, C. (2018). Using standardized test scores to include general cognitive ability in education research and policy. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 37.Google Scholar

Walker, S. O., & Plomin, R. (2005). The nature–nurture question: Teachers’ perceptions of how genes and the environment influence educationally relevant behaviour. Educational Psychology, 25(5), 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Blinded by neuroscience: Social policy, the family and the infant brain. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 397–414.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K. (2018). Network neuroscience theory of human intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 8–20.Google Scholar

Berry, J. W. (1974). Radical cultural relativism and the concept of intelligence. In Berry, J. W. & Dasen, P. R. (eds.), Culture and cognition: Readings in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 225–229). London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. (2009). On intelligence … A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., & Sharp, D. W. (1971). The cultural context of thinking and learning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., … Emslie, H. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289(5478), 457–460.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (2020). Secular changes in intelligence: The “Flynn effect.” In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.), pp. 940–963. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (2017). Taking a multiple intelligences (MI) perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16001631.Google Scholar

Glick, J. (1974). Cognitive development in cross-cultural perspective. In Hetherington, E. M. (ed.), Review of child development research, 4 (pp. 891–1008). Chicago: SRCD.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23.Google Scholar

Greenfield, P. M. (2020). Historical evolution of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 916–933). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Meier, E., Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., Yanez, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Academic and practical intelligence: A case study of the Yup’ik in Alaska. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(4), 183–207.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Analytical, creative, and practical intelligence as predictors of self–reported adaptive functioning: A case study in Russia. Intelligence, 29(1), 57–73.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89(1), 48–59.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2016). The neuroscience of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2020). The biological basis of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 451–468). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1962/2002). The organization of behavior. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hedlund, J. (2020). Practical intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 736–755). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s Structure-of-Intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 33–43.Google Scholar

Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium (1921). Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 123–147, 195–216, 271–275.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.) (2019). Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2020). Social intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 756–779). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krechevsky, M. (1998). Project Spectrum: Preschool assessment handbook. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Kunzmann, U. (2019). Performance-based measures of wisdom: State of the art and future directions. In Sternberg, R. J. & Glueck, J. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 277–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (1982). Culture and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 642–719). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1976a). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1976b). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). History of theories and measurement of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 1–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now! The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Rivers, S. E., Handley-Miner, I. J., Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. R. (2020). Emotional intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 709–735). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Shewach, O. R., & Dahlke, J A. (2020). The predictive value of general intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 381–414). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Serpell, R. (2000). Intelligence and culture. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 549–577). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Human intelligence: The model is the message. Science, 230(4730), 1111–1118.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2004a). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325–338.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) (2004b). International handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Foolishness. In Sternberg, R. J. & Jordan, J. (eds.), Handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 331–352). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2017). Measuring creativity: A 40+ year retrospective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 600–604. doi: 10.1002/jocb.218.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2018a). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50–67.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2018b). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in human development. Research in Human Development, 15(3–4), 200–210. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2018.1491216.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2019a). Intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Pickren, W. (eds.), Handbook of the intellectual history of psychology: How psychological ideas have evolved from past to present (pp. 267–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2019b). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity: How does one know which is which? In Mumford, M. & Higgs, C. A. (eds.), Leader thinking skills (pp. 362–381). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) (2020). Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. K. (eds.) (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J., Snook, S., Williams, W. M., … Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Glueck, J. (eds.) (2019). Cambridge handbook of wisdom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence and its development. In Bar-On, R. & Parker, J. D. A. (eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 215–243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (eds.) (2002). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Lipka, J., Newman, T., Wildfeuer, S., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Triarchically-based instruction and assessment of sixth-grade mathematics in a Yup’ik cultural setting in Alaska. International Journal of Giftedness and Creativity, 21(2), 6–19.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29(5), 401–418.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Smith, C. (1985). Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication. Social Cognition, 3(2), 168–192.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & The Rainbow Project Collaborators (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Walrath, R., Willis, J. O., Dumont, R., & Kaufman, A. S. (2020). Factor-analytic models of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.) (pp. 75–98). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Warne, R. T., & Burningham, C. (2019). Spearman’s g found in 21 non-Western nations: Strong evidence that g is a universal phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 237–272. doi: 10.1037/bul000184.Google Scholar

Yang, S., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Taiwanese Chinese people’s conceptions of intelligence. Intelligence, 25(1), 21–36.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2017). Adult intelligence: The construct and the criterion problem. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 987–998. doi: 10.1177/1745691617703437.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Cunha, F., Foorman, B. R., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Persistence and fade-out of educational-intervention effects: Mechanisms and potential solutions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 55–97.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Watts, T., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2018). Risky business: Correlation and causation in longitudinal studies of skill development. American Psychologist, 73(1), 81–94.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. H., Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., Geary, D. C., & Fuchs, D. (2020). Prevention: Necessary but insufficient? A two-year follow-up of effective first-grade mathematics intervention. Child Development, 91(2), 382–400.Google Scholar

Card, D., & Giuliano, L. (2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13678–13683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605043113.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 703–722. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.703.Google Scholar

Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2633.Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (2016). Pity the poor teacher because student characteristics are more significant than teachers or schools. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E93. doi: 10.1017/sip.2016.88.Google Scholar

Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.Google Scholar

Elango, S., García, J. L., Heckman, J. J., & Hojman, A. (2015). Early childhood education (No. w21766). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., & Imbens, G. (2013). Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions. NBER Working Paper 19614. www.nber.org/papers/w19614.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2004). Schools and the g factor. The Wilson Quarterly, 28(3), 35–45.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2014). Increased intelligence is a myth (so far). Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 34. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00034.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurwitz, M., Smith, J., Niu, S., & Howell, J. (2015). The Maine question: How is 4-year college enrollment affected by mandatory college entrance exams? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 138–159. doi: 10.3102/0162373714521866.Google Scholar

Hyman, J. (2017). ACT for all: The effect of mandatory college entrance exams on postsecondary attainment and choice. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 281–311. doi: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00206.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. C., & Jackson, C. K. (2019). Reducing inequality through dynamic complementarity: Evidence from Head Start and public school spending. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 310–349.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J., & Sundquist, K. (2015). Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: A Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(15), 4612–4617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417106112.Google Scholar

Kraft, M. A. (2019). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and social-emotional competencies. Journal of Human Resources, 54(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance. Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148–161. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148.Google Scholar

Lewis, N. A. Jr., & Wai, J. (in press). Communicating what we know, and what isn’t so: Science communication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://psyarxiv.com/cfmzkGoogle Scholar

Li, W., Leak, J., Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., Schindler, H., & Yoshikawa, H. (2017). Is timing everything? How early childhood education program impacts vary by starting age, program duration and time since the end of the program. Working Paper, National Forum on Early Childhood Policy and Programs, Meta-analytic Database Project. Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 137–150. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.137.Google Scholar

Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1608–1618. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535810.Google Scholar

Moreau, D., Macnamara, B. N., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2018). Overstating the role of environmental factors in success: A cautionary note. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 28–33. doi: 10.1177/0963721418797300.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. A. (2015). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Protzko, J. (2015). The environment in raising early intelligence: A meta-analysis of the fadeout effect. Intelligence, 53, 202–210.Google Scholar

Protzko, J. (2016). Does the raising IQ-raising g distinction explain the fadeout effect? Intelligence, 56, 65–71.Google Scholar

Protzko, J. (2017). Effects of cognitive training on the structure of intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1022–1031. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1196-1.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774253.Google Scholar

Sacerdote, B. (2007). How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 119–157. doi: 10.1162/qjec.122.1.119.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High-stakes testing in higher education and employment. American Psychologist, 63(4), 215–227. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.215.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Beatty, A. S., Rigdon, J. L., Shen, W., & Kiger, T. B. (2012). The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1000–1007. doi: 10.1177/0956797612438732.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. (2017). Beyond questionable research methods: The role of omitted relevant research in the credibility of research. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 5(1), 32–41. doi: 10.1037/arc0000033.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162–173. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162.Google Scholar

Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 628–654.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Volume 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2013). How many pathways underlie socioeconomic differences in the development of cognition and achievement? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.015.Google Scholar

Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Bates, T. C. (2016). Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychological Science, 27(2), 138–149. doi: 10.1177/0956797615612727.Google Scholar

Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Briley, D. A. (2014). Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 949. doi: 10.1037/a0035893.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E. (1991). Individual and group differences in adoption studies of IQ. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 392–405.Google Scholar

van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., & Poelhuis, C. W. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children’s IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 301–316. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.301.Google Scholar

Wai, , (2020). Communicating intelligence research. Journal of Intelligence, 8(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040040Google Scholar

Wai, J., Brown, M. I., & Chabris, C. F. (2018). Using standardized test scores to include general cognitive ability in education research and policy. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030037.Google Scholar

Wai, J., & Miller, D. I. (2015). Here’s why academics should write for the public. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/heres-why-academics-should-write-for-the-public-50874Google Scholar

Anderson, A. J., Kiela, D., Clark, S., & Poesio, M. (2017). Visually grounded and textual semantic models differentially decode brain activity associated with concrete and abstract nouns. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 17–30.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1319Google Scholar

Benn, Y., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2012). Language in calculation: A core mechanism? Neuropsychologia, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.045Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5Google Scholar

Chen, J. L., Zatorre, R. J., & Penhune, V. B. (2006). Interactions between auditory and dorsal premotor cortex during synchronization to musical rhythms. NeuroImage, 32(4), 1771–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.207Google Scholar

Clarke, A., Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2013). From perception to conception: How meaningful objects are processed over time. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs002Google Scholar

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407Google Scholar

Coutanche, M. N., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2015). Creating concepts from converging features in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2584–2593. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu057Google Scholar

Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh349Google Scholar

Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2010). The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.491359Google Scholar

Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41(6), 391–407.Google Scholar

Fugelsang, J. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.012Google Scholar

Fugelsang, J. A., Roser, M. E., Corballis, P. M., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2005). Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.001Google Scholar

Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 649–677. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144220Google Scholar

Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004) Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto‐central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21(3), 191–201. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10157Google Scholar

Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex, Science, 293(5539), 2425–2430. doi: 10.1126/science.1063736.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. C., & Kraemer, D. J. M. (2017). Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-zGoogle Scholar

Haynes, J. D., & Rees, G. (2006). Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(7), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1931Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of “life” and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12065Google Scholar

Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex plays an executive regulation role in comprehension of abstract words: Convergent neuropsychological and repetitive TMS evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(46), 15450–15456. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3783-10.2010Google Scholar